Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword, by Louis J. Moses
- Acknowledgments
- Note added in proof
- Part I Comparative and Developmental Approaches to Self-awareness
- Part II The Development of Self in Human Infants and Children
- 8 Detection of self: The perfect algorithm
- 9 Social imitation and the emergence of a mental model of self
- 10 Minds, bodies and persons: Young children's understanding of the self and others as reflected in imitation and theory of mind research
- Part III Self-awareness in Great Apes
- Part IV Mirrors and Monkeys, Dolphins, and Pigeons
- Part V Epilogue
- Author index
- Subject index
8 - Detection of self: The perfect algorithm
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 November 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword, by Louis J. Moses
- Acknowledgments
- Note added in proof
- Part I Comparative and Developmental Approaches to Self-awareness
- Part II The Development of Self in Human Infants and Children
- 8 Detection of self: The perfect algorithm
- 9 Social imitation and the emergence of a mental model of self
- 10 Minds, bodies and persons: Young children's understanding of the self and others as reflected in imitation and theory of mind research
- Part III Self-awareness in Great Apes
- Part IV Mirrors and Monkeys, Dolphins, and Pigeons
- Part V Epilogue
- Author index
- Subject index
Summary
The comparative analysis of when and how animals become aware of themselves has at least two levels of focus. One has to do with a conceptual awareness. It implies some representational memory and is reflected in some self-referencing behavior that discriminates unique features of the individual (Gallup, 1970; Lewis & Brooks-Gunn, 1979). Lewis and Brooks-Gunn call this level the “categorical self”. The other level of focus has to do with a perceptual sensitivity. It implies some detection mechanism and is reflected in some self-referencing behavior that discriminates self from nonself at least momentarily. Lewis and Brooks-Gunn call this level the “existential self”. This paper will be limited to a consideration of how infants detect their existential selves. It is the simpler of selves, but it has been none the less elusive in the history of developmental psychology.
Theoretical concern for detection of self
Self-discovery in Freudian and Piagetian theories
The two major developmental theories of this century, Freud's and Piaget's, each assume that normal development in humans requires an initial investment in the task of differentiating the self from its external environment. The theories differ as to when and how the task is accomplished. As for timing, Freud proposed a relatively speedy accomplishment within the first few months, whereas Piaget proposed that the task would take two or three times as long (Wolff, 1960). As for how the distinction between self and nonself is accomplished, the two theorists differed fundamentally.
Freud (1911/1946) attended to why we would be motivated to do so.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Self-Awareness in Animals and HumansDevelopmental Perspectives, pp. 131 - 148Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1994
- 36
- Cited by