Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:55:33.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The comparative and developmental study of self-recognition and imitation: The importance of social factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

Sue Taylor Parker
Affiliation:
Sonoma State University, California
Robert W. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond
Maria L. Boccia
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
Get access

Summary

Both mirror self-recognition (MSR) and “true” or “representational” imitation are among a host of different abilities that emerge in human infants between 18 and 24 months of age, when mental representation develops (Piaget, 1952). Mental representation is the highest cognitive achievement of the sensorimotor period. We believe that this is the basis for the expression of both self-recognition and imitation; by considering comparative and developmental evidence we shall discuss some of the cognitive conditions for each. Several researchers have suggested that the ability to imitate is a necessary condition for the development of self-recognition in human infants (e.g., Baldwin, 1903; Kaye, 1982; Lewis & Brooks-Gunn, 1979; see also Gopnik & Meltzoff, SAAH10; Hart & Fegley, SAAH9). However, contrary to this position, one hypothesis of this chapter is that imitation is not necessary for the development of self-recognition.

We believe that the developmental and comparative approaches must be used together in order to specify cognitive conditions for self-recognition and imitation (Mitchell, 1987; Parker, 1990, 1991). It is particularly difficult to determine the cognitive prerequisites by studying children alone, because many complex behaviors appear concurrently within a very narrow time frame. Developmental study of closely related primate species may be required to isolate the factors that are important in the development of cognitively complex behaviors such as self-recognition and imitation (Antinucci, 1989; Parker, 1991). Therefore, we shall utilize developmental data collected from our closest genetic relatives, chimpanzees, to compare with developmental data from human primates.

Type
Chapter
Information
Self-Awareness in Animals and Humans
Developmental Perspectives
, pp. 207 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×