In this chapter, I seek to explain the trajectory outlined in Chapter 3. I first show that regime-related factors, namely the prevailing political configuration and the authority and influence of the military, did play a role in shaping the judiciary’s military-related jurisprudence, but they cannot alone explain the incremental shift in the approach of the judiciary over the course of this period, and the transformation of the role the judiciary sought to play in the political system. I then argue that the incremental shift in the judiciary towards increased independence from the military and expansion and promotion of its own jurisdiction was linked to a change in the audiences that shaped legal and policy preferences within the judiciary during this period. The military’s institutional interlinkages with the judiciary diminished, and the judiciary’s interlinkages with the politically active bar of professional lawyers grew, which reshaped the norms and preferences of the judiciary. It is important to point out that this shift took place gradually, and thus there was an institutional lag before the effects of this shift were fully realized, which will become apparent in Chapter 5. However, without understanding these shifts it would be difficult to explain the changing approach of the judiciary towards the military over the course of this twenty-year period. I use a combination of sociological data on judges, archival information on judicial appointments and bar association politics, and interviews with judges and lawyers to trace this gradual but impactful shift.