Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:34:23.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - EU–China Security Cooperation in Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Emil J. Kirchner
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Thomas Christiansen
Affiliation:
Maastricht University
Han Dorussen
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Emil J. Kirchner
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Thomas Christiansen
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Han Dorussen
Affiliation:
University of Essex
HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Summary

The purpose of this chapter, and of the book as a whole, is to explore EU–China security relations, which have hitherto received scant attention in the writings on EU–China relations. This involves an empirical exercise of studying a number of security dimensions, through a number of heuristic orientations, structural interests and normative considerations. The purpose of these framing devices is to provide common elements of analysis to inform the following empirical chapters, rather than constitute a tight framework leading to systematic application.

EU–China security cooperation may appear tenuous and of little significance when seen next to the substantial amount of trade and other forms of economic cooperation between the two sides. Nevertheless, it is a topic of steadily rising importance, not only because economic and security concerns are becoming increasingly intertwined, but also as nontraditional security threats become more pronounced in international relations. Indeed, aside from economic interdependence, other factors affect the incidence of security cooperation between China and the EU. On the one hand, neither the EU nor China considers the other side as a potential enemy or a military threat – though the nondemocratic nature of the Chinese regime and its maritime territorial disputes continue to be viewed with suspicion by EU policymakers and public opinion (Casarini 2012: 4; Keohane et al. 2014). Instead, both China and the EU support a multipolar international order, and both adopt multilateralism as a key element of their foreign policy, albeit with differences in its practical application.

On the other hand, the EU and China have very different attitudes to key principles of inter-state relations such as state sovereignty, nonintervention and the territorial integrity of states. Furthermore, democratic aspirations and other normative concerns such as the rule of law or good governance matter for the EU in a way that they do not for China. More fundamentally, the fact that the EU is not a state carries with it limitations regarding the cohesion of its security policy, with security and defense policy remaining largely the prerogative of member states. The absence of a distinct EU military presence in Asia and the NATO membership of most EU countries diminish EU attractiveness as a genuine (independent) security actor in its dealings with China.

Type
Chapter
Information
Security Relations between China and the European Union
From Convergence to Cooperation?
, pp. 1 - 18
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

References

Barroso, J. M. D. 2013. “The Best Is Yet to Come: Past, Present and Future of the EU–Hong Kong Relationship.” Document SPEECH/13/966. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-13-966_en.htm (accessed April 30, 2016).
Barysch, K., Grant, C. and Leonard, M. 2005. “Embracing the Dragon: The EU's Partnership with China.” Centre for European Reform. Available at: www.cer.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/attachments/pdf/2011/p_610_dragon_partnership-910.pdf (accessed April 30, 2016).
Buzan, B. and Wæver, O. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O. and de Wilde, J. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Caballero-Anthony, M. and Cook, A. (eds.). 2013. Non-Traditional Security in Asia: Issues, Challenges and Framework for Action. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Callahan, W. 2012. China: The Pessoptimist Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Casarini, N. 2012. “EU Foreign Policy in the Asia Pacific: Striking the Right Balance between the US, China and ASEAN.” European Union Institute for Security Studies. Available at: www.iss.europa.eu/publications/detail/article/eu-foreign-policy-in-the-asia-pacific-striking-the-right-balance-between-the-us-china-and-asean/ (accessed April 30, 2016).
CEU (Council of the European Union). 1985. “Council Regulation Concerning the Conclusion of a Trade and Economic Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the People's Republic Of China.” Document 2616/85. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:1985:250:FULL&from=EN (accessed May 9, 2016).
CEU. 2003. “A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy.” Document COM (2003), 533 final. Available at: www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf (accessed February 27, 2014).
CEU. 2008. Reporting on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy: Providing Security in a Changing World.” Available at: www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/EN/reports/104630.pdf (accessed January 24, 2015).
CMFA (Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs). 2003. “China's EU Policy Paper.” Available at: www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/topics/ceupp/t27708.htm (accessed January 28, 2013).
CMFA. 2014. China's Policy Paper on the EU: Deepen the China–EU Comprehensive Strategic Partnership for Mutual Benefit and Win-Win Cooperation.” Available at: www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/wjzcs/t1143406.shtml (accessed January 24, 2015).
Dorussen, H. and Kirchner, E. 2014. “Better a Good Neighbor than a Distant Friend: The Scope and Impact of Regional Security Organizations,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 14(1): 117–46.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2003. “A Maturing Partnership: Shared Interests and Challenges in EU–China Relations.” Document COM (2003) 533. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=URISERV:r14207&from=EN (accessed May 9, 2016).
Foot, R. 2012. “US–China Interactions in Global Governance and International Organizations,” in Shambaugh, D. (ed.), The Tangled Titans: The United States and China. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 315–46.
Hettne, B. 2003. “Security Regionalism in Europe and South Asia,” in Hentz, J. and Boas, M. (eds.), New and Critical Security and Regionalism: Beyond the Nation State. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 149–66.
Ikenberry, G. J. 2011. “America's Challenge: The Rise of China and the Future of Liberal International Order.” New American Foundation. Available at: http://newamerica.net/publications/policy/america_s_challenge (accessed November 4, 2014).
Johnston, A. I. 2013. “How New and Assertive Is China's New Assertiveness?” International Security 37(4): 7–48.Google Scholar
Kahler, M. 2013. “Rising Powers and Global Governance: Negotiating Change in a Resilient Status Quo,” International Affairs 89(3): 711–29.Google Scholar
Kaldor, M. 1999. New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Katzenstein, P. 2005. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Keohane, D., Lehne, S., Speck, U. and Techlau, J. 2014. “A New Ambition for Europe: A Memo to the European Union Foreign Policy Chief.” Carnegie Europe. Available at: http://ceip.org/1wDL5bw (accessed January 29, 2015).
Mearsheimer, J. J. 2014. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, updated edn. New York: Norton.
Münkler, H. 2005. The New Wars. Oxford: Polity Press.
Noble, J. 2014. “China's Foreign Exchange Reserves Near Record $4tn,” Financial Times, April 15. Available at: www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4768bd3c-c461-11e3-8dd4-00144feabdc0.html (accessed September 7, 2015).
Reiterer, M. 2013. “The View from the EU,” in N. Casarini (ed.), “Brussels–Beijing: Changing the Game?” Report No. 14, European Union Institute for Security Studies. Available at: www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/Report__14.pdf (accessed April 30, 2016).
Shambaugh, D. (ed.). 2012. The Tangled Titans: The United States and China. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Simmons, B., Dobbin, F. and Garrett, G. 2006. “Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism,” International Organization 60(4): 781–810.Google Scholar
Van der Putten, F.-P. and Chu, S. 2011. “Conclusion,” in Van der Putten, F.-P. and Chu, S. (eds.), China, Europe and International Security: Interests, Roles and Prospects. London: Routledge, 195–201.
White House. 2013. “Resourcing the Rebalance toward the Asia-Pacific Region.” Available at: www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/04/12/resourcing-rebalance-toward-asia-pacific-region (accessed October 27, 2014).
Williams, P. (ed.). 2013. Security Studies: An Introduction. London: Routledge.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×