Allen, J. S., Joanne, L., Miller, J. L., & DeSteno, D. (2003). Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 544–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allen, J. S., & Miller, J. L. (2004). Listener sensitivity to individual differences in voice-onset-time: Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(6), 3171–3183.Google Scholar

Anderson, J., Morgan, J., & White, K. (2003). A statistical basis for speech sound discrimination. Language and Speech, 46, 155–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Antetomaso, S., Miyazawa, K., Feldman, N., Elsner, M., Hitczenko, K., & Mazuka, R. (2017). Modeling phonetic category learning from natural acoustic data. In Lamendola, M & Scott, J (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 32–45). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Aslin, R. (2014). Phonetic category learning and its influence on speech production. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 4–15.Google Scholar

Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P. (2006). Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 44, 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, W., Trofimovich, P., Flege, J. E., Mack, M., & Halter, R. (2008). Child-adult differences in second-language phonological learning: The role of cross-language similarity. Language and Speech, 51(4), 317–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benders, T., Escudero, P., & Sjerps, M. J. (2012). The interrelation between acoustic context effects and available response categories in speech sound categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(4), 3079–3097.Google Scholar

Bent, T. (2014). Children’s perception of foreign-accented words. Journal of Child Language, 41(6), 1334–1355.Google Scholar

Bent, T. (2018). Development of unfamiliar accent comprehension continues through adolescence. Journal of Child Language, 45, 1400–1411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bent, T., & Holt, R. F. (2018). Shhh … I need quiet! Children’s understanding of American, British, and Japanese-accented English speakers. Language and Speech, 61(4), 657–673.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 107–126). Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In Bohn, O. S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J E. (1993). Perceptual switching in Spanish/English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohn, O.-S.(2002). On phonetic similarity. In Burmeister, P, Piske, T, & Rohde, A (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 191–216). Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher.Google Scholar

Bohn, O.-S. (2020). Cross-language phonetic relationships account for most, but not all L2 speech learning problems: The role of universal phonetic biases and generalized sensitivities. In Wrembel, M, Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak, A, & Gąsiorowski, P (Eds.), Approaches to the study of sound structure and speech: Interdisciplinary work in honour of Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (pp. 171–184). Abingdon, England: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bohn, O.-S., & Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L. (2009). Second language speech learning with diverse inputs. In: Piske, T & Young-Scholten, M (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 207–218). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Bohn, O.-S., & Ellegaard, A. A. (2019). Perceptual assimilation and graded discrimination as predictors of identification accuracy for learners differing in L2 experience: The case of Danish learners’ perception of English initial fricatives. In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 2070–2074).Google Scholar

Bohn, O. S., & Steinlen, A. K. (2003). Consonantal context affects cross-language perception of vowels. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 2289–2292).Google Scholar

Bosch, L., & Ramon-Casas, M. (2011). Variability in vowel production by bilingual speakers: Can input properties hinder the early stabilization of contrastive categories? Journal of Phonetics, 39, 514–526.Google Scholar

Bradlow, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D., & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985.Google Scholar

Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brière, E. J. (1966). An investigation of phonological interferences. Language, 42(4), 768–796.Google Scholar

Broersma, M. (2005). Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(6), 3890–3901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buckler, H., Oczak-Arsic, S., Siddiqui, N., & Johnson, E. K. (2017). Input matters: Speed of word recognition in 2-year-olds exposed to multiple accents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 87–100.Google Scholar

Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2011). Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 433–461.Google Scholar

Callan, D. E., Jones, J. A., Callan, A. M., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2004). Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast. NeuroImage, 19, 113–124.Google Scholar

Callan, D. E., Tajima, K., Callan, A. M., Kubo, R., Masaki, S., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2003). Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models. NeuroImage, 22, 1182–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casillas, J. V., & Simonet, M. (2018). Perceptual categorization and bilingual language modes: Assessing the double phonemic boundary in early and late bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cebrian, J. (2006). Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 372–387.Google Scholar

Chandrasekaran, B., Sampath, P., & Wong, P. C. M. (2010). Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), 456–465.Google Scholar

Chládkova, K., & Podlipský, V. J. (2011). Native dialect matters: Perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Czech listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(4), EL186–EL192.Google Scholar

Chao, S-C., Ochoa, D., & Daliri, A. (2019). Production variability and categorical perception of vowels are strongly linked. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheung, B., Chudek, M., & Heine, S. (2011). Evidence for a sensitive period for acculturation: Younger immigrants report acculturating at a faster rate. Psychological Science, 22(2), 147–152.Google Scholar

Chodroff, E., & Wilson, C. (2017). Structure in talker-specific phonetic realization: Covariation of stop consonant VOT in American English. Journal of Phonetics, 61, 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, C., & Luce, P. (2005). Perceptual adaptation to speaker characteristics: VOT boundaries in stop voicing categorization. In Proceedings of the ISCA Workshop on Plasticity in Speech Perception (pp. 15–17).Google Scholar

Clayards, M. (2018). Differences in cue weights for speech perception are correlated for individuals within and across contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(3), EL172–EL177.Google Scholar

Darcy, I., & Krüger, F. (2012). Vowel perception and production in Turkish children acquiring L2 German. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 568–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean? In Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88–108). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

de Leeuw, E., & Celata, C. (2019). Plasticity of native phonetic and phonological domains in the context of bilingualism. Journal of Phonetics, 75, 88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Díaz, B., Mitterer, H., Broersma, M., Escera, C., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2015). Variability in L2 phonemic learning originates from speech-specific capabilities: An MMN study on late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(5), 955–970.Google Scholar

Díaz, B., Mitterer, H., Broersma, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2012). Individual differences in late bilinguals’ L2 phonological processes: From acoustic-phonetic to lexical access. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 680–689.Google Scholar

DiCanio, C., Nam, H., Amith, J. D., García, R. C., & Whalen, D. H. (2015). Vowel variability in elicited versus spontaneous speech: Evidence from Mixtec. Journal of Phonetics, 48, 45–59.Google Scholar

Docherty, G. J., Watt, D., Llamas, C., Hall, D., & Nycz, J. (2011). Variation in voice onset time along the Scottish border. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 591–594).Google Scholar

Dmitrieva, O. (2019). Transferring perceptual cue-weighting from second language into first language: Cues to voicing in Russian speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 83, 128–143.Google Scholar

Dmitrieva, O., Llanos, F., Shultz, A. A., & Francis, A. L. (2015). Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary voicing cue in Spanish and English. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dmitrieva, O., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2010). Phonological neutralization by native and non-native speakers: The case of Russian final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 483–492.Google Scholar

Earle, F. S., & Myers, E. B. (2015). Overnight consolidation promotes generalization across talkers in the identification of nonnative speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(1), EL91–EL97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eilers, R. E., & Oller, D. K. (1976). The role of speech discrimination in developmental sound substitutions. Journal of Child Language, 3(3), 319–329.Google Scholar

Elman, J. L., Diehl, R. L., & Buchwald, S. E. (1977). Perceptual switching in bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62(4), 971–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Escudero, P., Benders, T., & Lipski, S. (2009). Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: The case of Dutch, German, and Spanish listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 17(4), 452–465.Google Scholar

Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(4), 551–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Escudero, P., Sisinni, B., & Grimaldi, M. (2014). The effect of vowel inventory and acoustic properties in Salento Italian learners of Southern British English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(3), 1577–1584.Google Scholar

Escudero, P., & Williams, D. (2012). Native dialect influences second-language vowel perception: Peruvian versus Iberian Spanish learners of Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(5), EL406–EL412.Google Scholar

Evans, B. G., & Iverson, P. (2004). Vowel normalization for accent: An investigation of best exemplar locations in norther and southern British English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(1), 352–361.Google Scholar

Evans, S., & Davis, M. H. (2015). Hierarchical organization of auditory and motor representations in speech perception: Evidence from searchlight similarity analysis. Cerebral Cortex, 25(12), 4772–4788. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv136.Google Scholar

Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., Goldwater, S., & Morgan, J. L. (2013). A role for the developing lexicon in phonetic category acquisition. Psychological Review, 120(4), 751–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., & Morgan, J. L. (2009). The influence of categories on perception: Explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychological Review, 116(4), 752–782.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(3), 692–707.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1988). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(1), 70–79.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1992). The intelligibility of English vowels spoken by British and Dutch talkers. In Kent, R. D. (Ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders: Theory, measurement, and management (pp. 157–232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issue in cross-language research (pp. 229–273). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1998). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1999). Relation between L2 production and perception. In Ohala, J et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (pp. 1273–1276). Berkeley, CA: Department of Linguistics, University of California.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (2005a). Origins and development of the Speech Learning Model. Paper presented at the Acoustical Society of America Workshop in L2 speech learning, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.10181.19681.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (2005b). Evidence for plasticity in studies examining second language speech acquisition. Paper presented at the ISCA Workshop on Plasticity in Speech Perception, University College London. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.34539.80167.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (2007). Language contact in bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions. In Cole, J & Hualde, J (Eds.), Laboratory phonology (Vol. 9, pp. 353–380). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (2019). A non-critical period for second-language speech learning. In Nyvad, A. M., Hejná, M et al. (Eds.), A sound approach to language matters: In honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn (pp. 501–541). Aarhus: Department of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Yang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Davidian, R. (1984). Transfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1986). Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica, 43, 155–171.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stop consonants by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 67–83.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1988). Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of Spanish and English: Evidence for phonetic category formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 729–740.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., Walley, A. C., & Randazza, L. A. (1998). Lexical factors and segmental accuracy in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(2), 155–187.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Hammond, R. (1982). Mimicry of non-distinctive phonetic differences between language varieties. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(1), 1–16.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527–552.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Munro, M. (1994). The word unit in second language speech production and perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 381–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & Fox, R. A. (1994). Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(6), 3623–3641.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Munro, M., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995a). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3126–3134.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995b). Effects of age of second-language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication, 16, 1–26.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & Skelton, L. (1992). Production of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast by native speakers of English, Mandarin, and Spanish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92(1), 128–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Port, R. (1981). Cross-language phonetic interference: Arabic to English. Language and Speech, 24(2), 125–146.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Schirru, C., & MacKay, I. R. A. (2003). Interaction between the native and second language phonetic systems. Speech Communication, 40, 467–491.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1995). Japanese adults can learn to produce English /I/ and /l/ accurately. Language and Speech, 38, 25–55.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Wang, C. (1989). Native-language phonotactic constrains affect how well Chinese subjects perceive the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 299–315.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Wayland, R. (2019). The role of input in native Spanish late learners’ production and perception of English phonetic segments. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(1), 1–45.Google Scholar

Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2002). Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 349–366.Google Scholar

Francis, A. L., Kaganovich, N., & Driscoll-Huber, C. (2008). Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(2), 1234–1251.Google Scholar

Franken, M. K., Acheson, D. J., McQueen, J. M., Eisner, F., & Hagoort, P. (2017). Individual variability as a window on production-perception interactions in speech motor control. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(4), 2007–2018.Google Scholar

Frieda, E. M., Walley, A. C., Flege, J. E., & Sloane, M. E. (2000). Adults’ perception and production of the English vowel /i/. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garcia Lecumberri, M. L., Cooke, M., & Cutler, A. (2011). Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review. Speech Communication, 52, 864–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galbraith, G. C., Buranahirun, C. E., Kang, J., Ramos, O. V., & Lunde, S. E. (2000). Individual differences in autonomic activity affects brainstem auditory frequency-following response amplitude in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 283(3), 201–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garibaldi, C. L., & Bohn, O.-S. (2015). Phonetic similarity predicts ultimate attainment quite well: The case of Danish /i, y, u/ and /d, t/ for native speakers of English and of Spanish. Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow.Google Scholar

Giannakopoulou, A., Uther, M., & Ylinen, S. (2013). Enhanced plasticity in spoken language acquisition for child learners: Evidence from phonetic training studies in child and adult learners of English. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29(2), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golestani, N. (2016). Neuroimaging of phonetic perception in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(4), 674–682.Google Scholar

Golestani, N., Molko, N., Dehaene, S., LiBihan, D., & Pallier, C. (2007). Brain structure predicts the learning of foreign speech sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 575–582.Google Scholar

Gottfried, T. L. (1984). Effects of consonant context on the perception of French vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 91–114.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In J. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Guenther, F., Hampson, M., & Johnson, D. (1998). A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychological Review, 105(4), 611–633.Google Scholar

Gupta, P., & Dell, G. S. (1999). The emergence of language from serial order and procedural memory. In MacWhinney, B (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 447–481). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Han, Z., & Odlin, T. (Eds.). (2006). Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S., & Watson, C. (2000). Monophthongal vowel changes in received pronunciation: An acoustic analysis of the Queen’s Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 30(1–2), 63–78.Google Scholar

Hazan, V., & Barrett, S. (2000). The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6–12. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 377–396.Google Scholar

Hazan, V., & Kim, Y. H. (2010). Can we predict who will benefit from computer-based phonetic training? Paper presented at the Interspeech 2010, Satellite Workshop on “Second Language Studies: Acquisition, Learning, Education and Technology,” Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar

Hazan, V., & Rosen, S. (1991). Individual variability in the perception of cues to place variability in initial stops. Perception and Psychophysics, 49(2), 187–200.Google Scholar

Heald, S. L. M., & Nusbaum, H. (2015). Variability in vowel production within and between days. PLoS ONE, 10(9), e0136791. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136791.Google Scholar

Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099–3111.Google Scholar

Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93(4), 411–428.Google Scholar

Hockett, C. F. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Højen, A., & Flege, J. E. (2006). Early learners’ discrimination of second-language vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(5), 3072–3084.Google Scholar

Holt, L., & Lotto, A. J. (2006). Cue weighting in auditory categorization: Implications for first and second language acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(5), 3059–3071.Google Scholar

Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J. (2010). Speech perception as categorization. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72(5), 1218–1227.Google Scholar

Hopp, H., & Schmid, M. S. (2013). Perceived foreign accent in first language attrition and second language acquisition: The impact of age of acquisition and bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 361–394.Google Scholar

Hoormann, J., Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., & Blanke, L. (1992). The human frequency-following response (FFR): Normal variability and relation to the click-evoked brainstem response. Hearing Research, 59(2), 179–188.Google Scholar

Houde, J. F., & Jordan, M. I. (1998). Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science, 279(5354), 1213–1216.Google Scholar

Houde, J. F., & Jordan, M. I. (2002). Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 295–310.Google Scholar

Hu, W., Mi, L., Yang, Z., Tao, S., Li, M., Wang, W., Dong, Q., & Liu, C. (2016). Shifting perceptual weights in L2 vowel identification after training. Plos ONE, 11(9), e0162876. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162876.Google Scholar

Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. L. (2011). Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1939.Google Scholar

Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. (2013). The developmental trajectory of children’s perception and production of English /r/-/l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(6), 4232–4246.Google Scholar

Idemaru, K., Holt, L. L., & Seltman, H. (2012). Individual differences in cue weights are stable across time: The case of Japanese stop lengths. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(6), 3950–3964.Google Scholar

Imai, S., Walley, A. C., & Flege, J. E. (2005). Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native and Spanish listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(2), 896–907.Google Scholar

Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G. (2007). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: Perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(5), 2842–2854.Google Scholar

Iverson, P., & Evans, B. (2009). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(2), 866–877.Google Scholar

Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English/r/-/l/to Japanese adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(5), 3267–3278.Google Scholar

Iverson, P., Wagner, A., & Rosen, S. (2016). Effects of language experience on pre-categorical perception: Distinguishing general from specialized processes in speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139(4), 1799–1809.Google Scholar

Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 131–161.Google Scholar

Jia, G., Strange, W., Wu, Y., Collado, J., & Guan, Q. (2006). Perception and production of English vowels by Mandarin speakers: Age related differences vary with amount of exposure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(2), 1118–1130.Google Scholar

Johnson, K. (2000). Adaptive dispersion in vowel perception. Phonetica, 57, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson, K., Flemming, E., & Wright, R. (1993). The hyperspace effect: Phonetic targets are hyperarticulated. Language, 69, 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jongman, A., & Wade, T. (2007). Acoustic variability and perceptual learning: The case of non-native accented speech. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 135–150). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kachlika, M., Saito, K., & Tierney, A. (2019). Successful second language learning is tied to robust domain-general auditory processing and stable neural representation of sound. Brain and Language, 192, 15–24.Google Scholar

Kartushina, N., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2013). On the role of L1 speech production in L2 perception: Evidence from Spanish learners of French. Paper presented at Interspeech 2013, Lyon, France.Google Scholar

Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2016). Mutual influences between native and non-native vowels in production: Evidence from short-term visual articulatory feedback training. Journal of Phonetics, 57, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kharlamov, V. (2014). Incomplete neutralization of the voicing contrast in word-final obstruents in Russian: Phonological, lexical, and methodological in influences. Journal of Phonetics, 43(1), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kent, R. D., & Forner, L. L. (1980). Speech segment durations in sentence recitations by children and adults. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 157–168.Google Scholar

Kewley-Port, D. (2001). Vowel formant discrimination, II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(4), 2141–2155.Google Scholar

Kidd, G. R., Watson, C. S., & Gygi, B. (2007). Individual differences in auditory abilities. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(1), 418–435.Google Scholar

Kim, D., & Clayards, M. (2019). Individual differences in the link between perception and production and the mechanism of phonetic imitation. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 34(6), 769–786.Google Scholar

Kim, D., Clayards, M., & Goad, H. (2018). A longitudinal study of individual differences in the acquisition of new vowel contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 67, 1–20.Google Scholar

Kim, M. R. (2012). L1–L2 transfer in VOT and f0 production by Korean English learners: L1 sound change and L2 stop production. Phonetic and Speech Sciences, 4(3), 31–41.Google Scholar

Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015). Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. Psychological Review, 122(2), 148–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kluender, K. R., Lotto, A. J., Holt, L. L., & Bloedel, S. L. (1998). Role of experience for language-specific functional mappings of vowel sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104(6), 3568–3582.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. (1981). Contrastive phonology and the acquisition of phonetic skills. Phonetica, 38, 213–226.Google Scholar

Kong, E. J., & Edwards, J. (2015). Individual differences in L2 learner’s perceptual cue weighting patterns. Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow.Google Scholar

Kong, E. J., & Edwards, J. (2016). Individual differences in categorical perception of speech: Cue weighting and executive function. Journal of Phonetics, 59, 40–57.Google Scholar

Kong, E. J., & Yoon, I. H. (2013). L2 proficiency effect on the acoustic cue-weighting pattern by Korean L2 learners of English. Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences, 5(4), 81–90.Google Scholar

Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(2), 262–268.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. (1983). Perception of auditory equivalence classes for speech in early infancy. Infant Behavioral Development, 6, 263–285.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuhl, P. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(2), 11850–11857.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T., (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 979–1000.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P., Conboy, B. T., Padden, D., Nelson, T., & Pruitt, J. (2005). Early speech perception and later language development: Implications for the “critical period.” Language Learning and Development, 1, 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Vol. 1. Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Lee, H., & Jongman, A. (2018). Effects of sound change on the weighting of acoustic cues to the three-way laryngeal stop contrast in Korean: Diachronic and dialectal comparisons. Language and Speech, 63(3), 509–530.Google Scholar

Lee, S., Potamianos, A., & Narayanan, S. (1999). Acoustics of children’s speech: Developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(3), 1455–1468.Google Scholar

Lehet, M., & Holt, L. (2017). Dimension-based statistical learning affects both speech perception and production. Cognitive Science, 41, 885–912.Google Scholar

Lengeris, A. (2009). Individual differences in second-language vowel learning. Unpublished PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar

Lengeris, A., & Hazan, V. (2010). The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6), 3757–3768.Google Scholar

Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lev-Ari, S., & Peperkamp, S. (2013). Low inhibitory skill leads to non-native perception and production in bilinguals’ native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 320–331.Google Scholar

Levy, E. S. (2009a). Language experience and consonantal context effects on perceptual assimilation of French vowels by American-English learners of French. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(2), 1138–1152.Google Scholar

Levy, E. S. (2009b). On the assimilation-discrimination relationship in American English adults’ French vowel learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(5), 2670–2682.Google Scholar

Levy, E. S., & Law, F. F., II. (2009). Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationship. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(3), 1290–1305.Google Scholar

Levy, E. S., & Strange, W. (2008). Perception of French vowels by American English adults with and without French language experience. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 141–157.Google Scholar

Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Marchal, A (Eds.), Speech production and speech modeling (pp. 403–439). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

MacKay, I. R. A., Flege, J. E., & Imai, S. (2006). Evaluating the effects of chronological age and sentence duration on degree of perceived foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 157–183.Google Scholar

MacKay, I. R. A., Flege, J. E., Piske, T., & Schirru, C. (2001). Category restructuring during second-language acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 516–528.Google Scholar

MacKay, I. R. A., Meador, D., & Flege, J. E. (2001). The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica, 58, 103–125.Google Scholar

Magezi, D. (2015). Linear mixed-effects models for within-participant psychology experiments: an introductory tutorial and free graphical user interface (LMMgui). Frontiers in Psychology, 6(2). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00002.Google Scholar

Markham, D. (1999). Phonetic imitation, accent, and the learner. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.Google Scholar

Markham, D., & Hazan, V. (2004). Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 116(5), 3108–3118.Google Scholar

Maye, J., Werker, J., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101–B111.Google Scholar

Mayr, R., & Escudero, P. (2010). Explaining individual variation in L2 perception: Rounded vowels in English learners of German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 279–297.Google Scholar

McAllister, R., Flege, J. E., & Piske, T. (2003). The influence of the L1 on Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 229–258.Google Scholar

McQueen, J. M., Tyler, M. D., & Cutler, A. (2012). Lexical retuning of children’s speech perception: Evidence for knowledge about words’ component sounds. Language Learning and Development, 8, 317–339.Google Scholar

Miller, J. L. (1994). On the internal structure of phonetic categories. Cognition, 50, 271–285.Google Scholar

Mielke, J., Baker, A., & Archangeli, D. (2016). Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity: Evidence from bunched and retroflex /ɹ/. Language, 92(1), 101–140.Google Scholar

Mitterer, H., Reinisch, E., & McQueen, J. M. (2018). Allophones, not phonemes in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 98, 77–92.Google Scholar

Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., Liberman, A. M., Verbrugge, R., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception and Psychophysics, 18(5), 331–340.Google Scholar

Mochizuki, M. (1981). The identification of/r/and/l/in natural and synthesized speech. Journal of Phonetics, 9(3), 283–303.Google Scholar

Mora, J. C., & Mora-Plaza, I. (2019). Contributions of cognitive attention control to L2 speech learning. In Nyvad, A. M., Hejná, M et al. (Eds.), A sound approach to language matters – In honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn (pp. 477–499). Aarhus: Dept. of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University.Google Scholar

Mora, J. C., Keidel, J. L., & Flege, J. E. (2010). Why are the Catalan contrasts between /e/-/ε/ and /o/-/ɔ/ so difficult for even early Spanish-Catalan bilinguals to perceive? In Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, K, Wrembel, M, & Jul, M (Eds.), New sounds 2010: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech (pp. 325–330).Google Scholar

Mora, J. C., Keidel, J. L., & Flege, J. E. (2015). Effects of Spanish use on the production of Catalan vowels by early Spanish-Catalan bilinguals. In Romero, J & Riera, M (Eds.), The phonetics–phonology interface: Representations and methodologies (pp. 33–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Morrongiello, B., Robson, R. C., Best, C. T., & Clifton, R. K. (1984). Trading relations in the perception of speech by 5-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 231–250.Google Scholar

Moyer, A. (2009). Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality of experience in L2 phonological attainment. In Piske, T & Young-Scholten, M (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 159–174). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Nam, Y., & Polka, L. (2016). The phonetic landscape in infant consonant perception is an uneven terrain. Cognition, 155, 57–66.Google Scholar

Nasir, S. M., & Ostry, D. J. (2009). Auditory plasticity and speech motor learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(48), 20470–20475.Google Scholar

Nathan, L., Wells, B., & Donlan, C. (1998). Children’s comprehension of unfamiliar regional accents: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Child Language, 25, 343–365.Google Scholar

Neuman, A., & Hochberg, L. (1983). Children’s perception of speech in reverberation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 2145–2149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Newman, R. S. (2003). Using links between speech perception and speech production to evaluate different acoustic metrics: A preliminary report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(5), 2850–2860.Google Scholar

Newman, R. S., Clouse, S. A., & Burnham, J. L. (2001). The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1181–1196.Google Scholar

Newton, C., & Ridgway, S. (2015). Novel accent perception in typically-developing school-aged children. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 32(1) 111–123.Google Scholar

Nielsen, K. (2011). Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 132–142.Google Scholar

Nittrouer, S. (2004). The role of temporal and dynamic signal components in the perception of syllable-final stop voicing by children and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(4), 1777–1790.Google Scholar

Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57.Google Scholar

Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5, 42–46.Google Scholar

Peperkamp, S., & Bouchon, C. (2011). The relation between perception and production in L2 phonological processing. Paper presented at Interspeech 2011, 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar

Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., Lane, H., Matthies, M. L., Stockmann, E., Tiede, M., & Zandipour, M. (2004). The distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4), 2338–2344.Google Scholar

Perkell, J. S., Matthies, M. L., Tiede, M., Lane, H., Zandipour, M., Marrone, N., … Guenther, F. H. (2004). The distinctness of speakers’ /s/-/ʃ/ contrast is related to their auditory discrimination and use of an articulatory saturation effect. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1259–1269.Google Scholar

Pisoni, D. B., Aslin, R. N., Perey, A. J., & Hennessy, B. L. (1982). Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 297–314.Google Scholar

Pisoni, D., Lively, S., & Logan, J. (1994). Perceptual learning of nonnative speech contrasts: Implications for theories of speech perception. In Goodman, J & Nusbaum, H (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 121–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Polka, L., & Bohn, O. S. (2003). Asymmetries in vowel perception. Speech Communication, 41(1), 221–231.Google Scholar

Polka, L., & Bohn, O. S. (2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478.Google Scholar

Reiterer, S. M., Hu, X., Sumathi, T. A., & Singh, N. C. (2013). Are you a good mimic? Neuro-acoustic signatures for speech imitation ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(3). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00782.Google Scholar

Remez, R. E., Fellowes, J. M, & Rubin, P. E. (1997). Talker identification based on phonetic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 23, 651–666.Google Scholar

Rochet, B. L. (1995). Perception and production of second-language speech sounds by adults. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issue in cross-language research (pp. 229–273). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

Rogers, C. L., Lister, J. L., Febo, D. M., Besing, J. M., & Abrams, H. B. (2006). Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(3), 465–485.Google Scholar

Saito, K., Sun, H., & Tierney, A. (2019). Explicit and implicit aptitude effects on second language speech learning: Scrutinizing segmental and suprasegmental sensitivity and performance via behavioral and neurophysiological measures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(5), 1123–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuel, A. (1981). Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(4), 474–494.Google Scholar

Sancier, M., & Fowler, C. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schertz, J., Cho, T., Lotto, A., & Warner, N. (2015). Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 183–204.Google Scholar

Schertz, J., Cho, T., Lotto, A., & Warner, N. (2016). Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78, 355–367.Google Scholar

Schmidtke, J. (2016). The bilingual disadvantage in speech understanding in noise is likely a frequency effect related to reduced language exposure. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(7). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00678.Google Scholar

Schulze, K., Vargha-Khade, F., & Mishkin, M. (2012). Test of a motor theory of long-term auditory memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(18), 7121–7125.Google Scholar

Sheldon, A., & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of/r/and/l/by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3(3), 243–261.Google Scholar

Shultz, A. A., Francis, A. L., & Llanos, F. (2012). Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(2), EL95–EL101.Google Scholar

Slevc, L. R., & Miyake, A. (2006). Individual differences in second-language proficiency. Psychological Science, 17(8), 675–681.Google Scholar

Smit, A., Hand, L., Freilinger, J., Bernthal, J., & Bird, A. (1990). The Iowa articulation norms project and its Nebraska replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 779–798.Google Scholar

Smits, R., Sereno, J., & Jongman, A. (2006). Categorization of sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 733–754.Google Scholar

Smith, B. L. (1979). A phonetic analysis of consonantal devoicing in children’s speech. Journal of Child Language, 6(1), 19–28.Google Scholar

Snow, C., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. (1979). Individual differences in second-language ability: A factor-analytic study. Language and Speech, 22, 151–162.Google Scholar

Song, J., & Iverson, P. (2018). Listening effort during speech perception enhances auditory and lexical process for non-native listeners and accents. Cognition, 179, 163–170.Google Scholar

Song, J. Y., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Demuth, K. (2015). Development of phonetic variants (allophones) in 2-year-olds learning American English: a study of alveolar stops /t, d/ codas. Journal of Phonetics, 55, 152–169.Google Scholar

Strange, W. (1992). Learning non-native phoneme contrasts: Interactions among subject, stimulus, and task variables. In Tohkura, E, Vatikiotis-Bateson, E, & Sagisaka, Y (Eds.), Speech perception, production, and linguistic structure (pp. 197–219). Tokyo: Ohmsha.Google Scholar

Strange, W. (2007). Cross-language phonetic similarity of vowels: Language experience in second language speech learning. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 35–55). Berlin: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Strange, W. (2011). Automatic selective perception (ASP) of first and second language speech: A working model. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 456–466.Google Scholar

Strange, W., Bohn, O.-S., Nishi, K., & Trent, S. A. (2005). Contextual variation in the acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1751–1762.Google Scholar

Stevens, K. N., Liberman, A. M., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Öhman, S. (1969). Cross-language study of vowel perception. Language and Speech, 12, 1–23.Google Scholar

Takagi, N. (1993). Perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by adult Japanese learners of English: A unified view. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California at Irvine.Google Scholar

Theodore, R. M., Miller, J. L., & DeSteno, D. (2009). Individual talker differences in voice-onset time: Contextual influences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(6), 3974–3982.Google Scholar

Theodore, R. M., Monto, N. R., & Graham, S. (2020). Individual differences in distributional learning for speech: What’s ideal for ideal observers? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63, 1–13Google Scholar

Thorin, J., Sadakata, M., Desain, P., & McQueen, J. M. (2018). Perception and production in interaction during non-native speech category learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(1), 92–103.Google Scholar

Tourville, H. A., & Guenther, F. H. (2011). The DIVA model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production. Language and Cognitive Processing, 26(7), 952–981.Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, N. (1939). Principles of phonology. C. A. Baltaxe (Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Tulving, E. (1981). Similarity relations in recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 479–496.Google Scholar

Tyler, M. D. (2019). PAM-L2 and phonological category acquisition in the foreign language classroom. In Nyvad, A. M., Hejná, M et al. (Eds.), A sound approach to language matters – In honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn (pp. 607–630). Aarhus: Department of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University.Google Scholar

Walley, A. C., & Flege, J. E. (1999). Effect of lexical status on children’s and adults’ perception of native and non-native vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 27(3), 307–332.Google Scholar

Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Werker, J. F., & Byers-Heinlein, K. (2008). Bilingualism in infancy: First steps in perception and comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(4),144–150.Google Scholar

Werker, J. F., & Logan, J. (1985). Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 35–44.Google Scholar

Westbury, J. R., Hashi, M., & Lindstrom, M. J. (1998). Differences among speakers in lingual articulation for American English /r/. Speech Communication, 26(3) 203–226.Google Scholar

Whalen, D., Abramson, A. S., Lisker, L., & Mody, M. (1993). F0 gives voicing information even without unambiguous voice onset times. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(4), 2152–2159.Google Scholar

Williams, L. (1977). The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception and Psychophysics, 21(4), 289–297.Google Scholar

Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2000). Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(2), 131–149.Google Scholar

Ylinen, S., Uther, M., Latvala, A., Vepsäläinen, S. Iverson, P., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Näätänen, R. (2010). Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: A study of Finish second-language users of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1319–1332.Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Kuhl, P. K., Imada, T., Kotani, M., & Tohkura, Y. I. (2005). Effects of language experience: Neural commitment to language-specific auditory patterns. NeuroImage, 26(3), 703–720.Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2007). Neural plasticity in speech acquisition and learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(2), 147–160.Google Scholar

Akamatsu, T. (1971). The problem of the so-called “Japanese R.” Linguistische Berichte, 12, 31–39.Google Scholar

Aoyama, K., & Flege, J. E. (2011). Effects of L2 experienced on perception of English /r/ and /l/ by native Japanese speakers. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 15(3), 5–13.Google Scholar

Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2019). An acoustic analysis of American English liquids by adults and children: Native English speakers and naïve Japanese speakers of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(4), 2671–2681.Google Scholar

Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Effects of L2 experience on perception of English /r/ and /l/ by native Japanese speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 233–250.Google Scholar

Arai, T. (2013). On why Japanese /r/ sounds are difficult for children to acquire. In Bimbot, F et al. (Eds.), 14th annual conference of the International Speech Communication Association (pp. 2445–2449).Google Scholar

Arai, T., & Mugitani, R. (2016). The acoustic environment and spoken language development by children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 72(3), 129–136.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20(3), 305–330.Google Scholar

Bradlow, A. (2008). Training non-native language sound patterns: Lessons from training Japanese adults on the English /r/-/l/ contrast. In Hansen Edwards, J & Zampini, M (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 287–308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bradlow, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299–2310.Google Scholar

Bradlow, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D., & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985.Google Scholar

Callan, D. E., Jones, J. A., Callan, A. M., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2004). Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models. NeuroImage, 22, 1182–1194.Google Scholar

Callan, D. E., Tajima, K., Callan, A. M., Kubo, R., Masaki, S., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2003). Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast. NeuroImage, 19, 113–124.Google Scholar

Cochrane, R. M. (1980). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese children and adults learning English as a second language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1, 331–360.Google Scholar

Cutler, A., Weber, A., & Otake, T. (2006). Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 269–284.Google Scholar

Delattre, P., & Freeman, D. C. (1968). A dialect study of American English r’s by x-ray motion picture. Linguistics, 44, 28–69.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1995). Japanese adults can learn to produce English /r/ and /l/ accurately. Language and Speech, 38, 25–56.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1996). Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /r/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1161–1173.Google Scholar

Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6(1), 110–125.Google Scholar

Gordon, P., Keyes, L., & Yung, Y.-F. (2001). Ability in perceiving nonnative contrasts: Performance on natural and synthetic speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(4), 746–758.Google Scholar

Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R.” Neuropsychologia, 9, 317–323.Google Scholar

Guion, S., Flege, J. E., Yamada, R. A., & Pruitt, J. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5), 2711–2744.Google Scholar

Hattori, K. (2009). Perception and production of English /r/-/l/ by adult Japanese speakers. PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar

Hattori, K., & Iverson, P. (2009). English /r/-/l/ category assimilation by Japanese adults: Individual differences and the link to identification accuracy. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(1), 469–479.Google Scholar

Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. (2011). Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1939–1956.Google Scholar

Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. (2013). The developmental trajectory of children’s perception and production of English /r7-/l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(6), 4232–4246.Google Scholar

Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. (2014). Specificity of dimension-based statistical learning in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 1009–1021.Google Scholar

Idemaru, K., Holt, L. L., & Seltman, H. (2012). Individual differences in cue weights are stable across time: The case of Japanese stop lengths. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(6), 3950–3964.Google Scholar

Ingvalson, E., Holt, L., & McClelland, J. (2012). Can native Japanese listeners learn to differentiate /r–l/ on the basis of F3 onset frequency? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(2), 255–274.Google Scholar

Ingvalson, E., McClelland, J., & Holt, L. (2011). Predicting native English-like performance by native Japanese speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 571–584.Google Scholar

Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(5), 3267–3278.Google Scholar

Iverson, P., Kuhl, P., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87, B47–B57.Google Scholar

Iverson, P., Wagner, A., & Rosen, S. (2016). Effects of language experience on pre-categorical perception: Distinguishing general from specialized processes in speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139(4), 1799–1809.Google Scholar

Kachlika, M., Saito, K., & Tierney, A. (2019). Successful second language learning is tied to robust domain-general auditory processing and stable neural representations of sound. Brain and Language, 192, 15–24.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P. (2006). Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9(2), F13–F21.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Lambacher, S. (1999). A CALL tool for improving second language acquisition of English consonants by Japanese learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12, 137–156.Google Scholar

Lenneberg, E. (1967). The biological foundations of language. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Logan, J., Lively, S., & Pisoni, D. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–886.Google Scholar

Lotto, A., Sato, M., & Diehl, R. (2004). Mapping the task for the second language learner: The case of Japanese acquisition of /r/ and /l/. In Sliftka, J et al. (Eds.), From sound to sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech communication (pp. C181–C186). Cambridge, MA: Research Laboratory of Electronics at MIT.Google Scholar

MacKain, K., Best, C., & Strange, W. (1981). Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKay, I. R. A., Meador, D., & Flege, J. E. (2001). The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica, 58, 103–125.Google Scholar

McGowan, R. S., Nittrouer, S., & Manning, C. J. (2004). Development of [ɹ] in young, Midwestern, American children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(2), 871–884.Google Scholar

Mielke, J., Baker, A., & Archangeli, D. (2016). Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity: Evidence from bunched and retroflex /ɹ/. Language, 92(1), 101–140.Google Scholar

Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J., Strange, W., Liberman, A., Verbrugge, R., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of (r) and (l) by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(5), 331–340.Google Scholar

Riney, T., & Flege, J. E. (1998). Changes over time in global foreign accent and liquid identifiability and accuracy. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 213–243.Google Scholar

Riney, T., Takada, M., & Ota, M. (2000). Segmentals and global foreign accent: The Japanese flap in EFL. TESOL Quarterly, 34(4), 711–737.Google Scholar

Saito, K., & Munro, M. (2014). The early phase of /ɹ/ production development in adult Japanese learners of English. Language and Speech, 57(4), 451–469.Google Scholar

Shimizu, K., & Dantsuji, M. (1983). A study of the perception of /r/ and /l/ in natural and synthetic speech sounds. Studia Phonologica, 17, 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Shinohara, Y., & Iverson, P. (2018). High variability identification and discrimination training for Japanese speakers learning English /r/-/l/. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 242–251.Google Scholar

Smit, A., Hand, L., Freilinger, J., Bernthal, J., & Bird, A. (1990). The Iowa articulation norms project and its Nebraska replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 779–798.Google Scholar

Song, J. Y., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Demuth, K. (2015). Development of phonetic variants (allophones) in 2-year-olds learning American English: A study of alveolar stop /t, d/ codas. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 152–169.Google Scholar

Strange, W. (2011). Automatic selective perception (ASP) of first and second language speech: A working model. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 456–466.Google Scholar

Takagi, N. (1993). Perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by adult Japanese learners of English: A Unified View. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California at Irvine.Google Scholar

Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1995). The limits of extended naturalistic exposure on the perceptual mastery of English /r/ and /l/ by adult Japanese learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16(4), 380–406.Google Scholar

Vance, T. (2008). The sounds of Japanese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Westbury, J., Hashi, M., & Lindstrom, M. J. (1998). Differences among speakers in lingual articulation for American English /ɹ/. Speech Communication, 26(3), 203–226.Google Scholar

Yamada, J. (1991). The discrimination learning of the liquids/r/ and /l/ by Japanese speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(1), 31–46.Google Scholar

Yamada, R. A. (1995). Age and acquisition of second language speech sounds: Perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issue in cross-language research (pp. 305–320). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

Yamada, R. A., & Tohkura, Y. (1990). Perception and production of syllable-initial English /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese. In ICSLP-1990, First International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 757–760).Google Scholar

Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1992). The effects of experimental variables on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese listeners. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(4), 376–392.Google Scholar

Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y., & Kobayashi, N. (1997). Effect of word familiarity on non-native phoneme perception: identification of English /r/, /l/, and /w/ by native speakers of Japanese. In James, A & Leather, J (Eds.), Second-language speech, structure and process (pp. 103–118). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Yoshida, K., & Hirasaka, F. (1983). The lexicon in speech perception. Sophia Linguistica, 11, 105–116.Google Scholar

Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., & Kroos, C. (2010). Language context elicits native-like stop voicing in early bilinguals’ productions in both L1 and L2. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 640–653.Google Scholar

Birdsong, D. (2003). Authenticité de prononciation en français L2 chez des apprenants tardifs anglophones: Analyses segmentales e globales. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 18, 17–36.Google Scholar

Bohn, O. S., & Flege, J. E. (1993). Perceptual switching in Spanish/English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 21(3), 267–290.Google Scholar

Bos, M., Schoevers, R. A., & ann het Rot, M. (2015). Experience sampling and ecological momentary assessment studies in psychopharmacology: A systematic review. European Neuropharmacology. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.08.008.Google Scholar

Dmitrieva, O., Llanos, F., Shultz, A. A., & Francis, A. L. (2015). Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary voicing cue in Spanish and English. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 77–95.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1982). Laryngeal timing and phonation onset in utterance-initial English stops. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 177–192.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (2003). A method for assessing the perception of vowels in a second language. In Fava, E & Mioni, A (Eds.), Issues in clinical linguistics (pp. 19–44). Padvoa: Unipress.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (2005). Origins and development of the Speech Learning Model. Paper presented at the 1st Acoustical Society of America Workshop in L2 speech Learning, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.10181.19681.Google Scholar

Flege, J. (2009). Give input a chance! In Piske, T & Young-Scholten, M (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 175–190). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (2019). A non-critical period for second-language speech learning. In Nyvad, A. M., Hejná, M et al. (Eds.), A sound approach to language matters – In honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn (pp. 501–541). Aarhus: Department of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Aoyama, K., & Bohn, O.-S. (2020). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r) applied. In Wayland, R (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1988). Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of Spanish and English: Evidence for phonetic category formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 729–740.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. R. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 1–34.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Schmidt, A. M., & Wharton, G. (1996). Age of learning affects rate-dependent processing of stops in a second language. Phonetica, 53, 143–161.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Wayland, R. (2019). The role of input in native Spanish Late learners’ production and perception of English phonetic segments. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(1), 1–45.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In Nicol, J (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hartshorne, J., Tenenbaum, J., & Pinker, S. (2018). A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition, 177, 263–277.Google Scholar

Heron, K. E., Everhart, R. S., McHale, S. M., & Smyth, J. M. (2017). Using mobile-technology-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods with youth: A systematic review and recommendations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 42(10), 1087–1107.Google Scholar

Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3099–3111.Google Scholar

Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. In. Resi, H. T. (Ed.), Naturalistic approaches to studying social interactions: New directions for methodology of social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 15, pp. 41–56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

MacKay, I. A. R., Meador, D., & Flege, J. E. (2001). The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica, 58, 103–125.Google Scholar

Meador, D., Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. R. (2000). Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(1), 55–67.Google Scholar

Sancier, M. L., & Fowler, C. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 421–436.Google Scholar

Theodore, R., Miller, J., & DeSteno, D. (2009). Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time: Contextual influences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 3974–3982.Google Scholar

Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2013). Focusing the lens of language experience: Perception of Ma’di stops by Greek and English bilinguals and monolinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(4), 2397–2411.Google Scholar

Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 233–250.Google Scholar

Balas, A. (2018). English vowel perception by Polish advanced learners of English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 63(3), 309–338.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1994a). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In Goodman, J. C. & Nusbaum, H. C. (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167–244). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1994b). Learning to perceive the sound pattern of English. In Rovee-Collier, C & Lipsitt, L. P. (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 9, pp. 217–304). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (2015). Devil or angel in the details? Perceiving phonetic variation as information about phonological structure. In Romero, J & Riera, M (Eds.), Phonetics-phonology interface: Representations and methodologies (pp. 3–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (2019). The diversity of tone languages and the roles of pitch variation in non-tone languages: Considerations for tone perception research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 364.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., Goldstein, L. M., Nam, H., & Tyler, M. D. (2016). Articulating what infants attune to in native speech. Ecological Psychology, 28(4), 216–261.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., & McRoberts, G. W. (2003). Infant perception of non-native consonant contrasts that adults assimilate in different ways. Language and Speech, 46(2–3), 183–216.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(2), 775–794.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 345–360.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20(3), 305–330.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., Traill, A., Carter, A., Harrison, K. D., & Faber, A. (2003). !Xóõ click perception by English, Isizulu, and Sesotho listeners. In Solé, M. J., Recasens, D, & Romero, J (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 853–856). Barcelona: Causal Productions.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Munro, M. J. & Bohn, O.-S. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., Gooding, T. N., Orlando, C. B., & Quann, C. A. (2009). Development of phonological constancy: Toddlers’ perception of native-and Jamaican-accented words. Psychological Science, 20(5), 539–542.Google Scholar

Bohn, O.-S. (2017). Cross-language and second language speech perception. In Fernández, E. M. & Cairns, H. S. (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 213–239). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 977–985.Google Scholar

Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2011). Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 433–461.Google Scholar

Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 345–360.Google Scholar

Faris, M. M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2016). An examination of the different ways that non-native phones may be perceptually assimilated as uncategorized. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139(1), EL1–EL5.Google Scholar

Faris, M. M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2018). Discrimination of uncategorised non-native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 1–19.Google Scholar

Fenwick, S. E., Best, C. T., Davis, C., & Tyler, M. D. (2017). The influence of auditory-visual speech and clear speech on cross-language perceptual assimilation. Speech Communication, 92, 114–124.Google Scholar

Gerrits, E., & Schouten, M. (2004). Categorical perception depends on the discrimination task. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(3), 363–376.Google Scholar

Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds ‘l’ and ‘r’. Neuropsychologia, 9(3), 317–323.Google Scholar

Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2711–2724.Google Scholar

Harnsberger, J. D. (2001). On the relationship between identification and discrimination of non-native nasal consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(1), 489–503.Google Scholar

Hattori, K., & Iverson, P. (2009). English /r/-/l/ category assimilation by Japanese adults: Individual differences and the link to identification accuracy. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 469–479.Google Scholar

Iverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87, B47–B57.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., & Polka, L. (1995). Not everyone can tell a ‘rock’ from a ‘lock’: Assessing individual differences in speech perception. In Lubinski, D. J. & Dawis, R. V. (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 297–325). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.Google Scholar

Levy, E. S. (2009). On the assimilation-discrimination relationship in American English adults’ French vowel learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(5), 2670–2682.Google Scholar

MacKain, K. S., Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1981). Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 369–390.Google Scholar

Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., Liberman, A. M., Verbrugge, R., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(5), 331–340.Google Scholar

Polka, L. (1991). Cross-language speech perception in adults: Phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2961–2977.Google Scholar

Reid, A., Burnham, D., Kasisopa, B., Reilly, R., Attina, V., Rattanasone, N. X., & Best, C. T. (2015). Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone: The roles of language experience and visual information. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 77(2), 571–591.Google Scholar

So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293.Google Scholar

So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2014). Phonetic influences on English and French listeners’ assimilation of Mandarin tones to native prosodic categories. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 195–221.Google Scholar

Strange, W. (2011). Automatic selective perception (ASP) of first and second language speech: A working model. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 456–466.Google Scholar

Strange, W., & Shafer, V. L. (2008). Speech perception in second language learners: The re-education of selective perception. In Hansen Edwards, J. G. & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 159–198). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tyler, M. D. (2019). PAM-L2 and phonological category acquisition in the foreign language classroom. In Nyvad, A. M., Hejná, M, Højen, A, Jespersen, A. B., & Sørensen, M. H. (Eds.), A sound approach to language matters – In honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn (pp. 607–630). Aarhus, Denmark: Department of English, School of Communication and Culture, Aarhus University.Google Scholar