Altenberg, E. P., & Vago, R. M. (1983). Theoretical implications of an error analysis of second language phonology production. Language Learning, 33, 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

Best, C.T., and Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. and Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: Benjamin.Google Scholar

Blevins, J. (2006). A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics, 32, 117–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brannen, K. (2002). The role of perception in differential substitution. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 47, 1–46.Google Scholar

Broersma, M. (2005). Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 3890–3901.Google Scholar

Broselow, E., Chen, S. I., & Wang, C. (1998). The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 261–280.Google Scholar

Calabrese, A. (1995). A constraint-based theory of phonological markedness and simplification procedures. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 373–463.Google Scholar

Chao, K. Y., & Chen, L. M. (2008). A cross-linguistic study of voice onset time in stop consonant productions. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 13, 215–232.Google Scholar

Cho, T., & Keating, P. A. (2001). Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 155–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cho, T., Jun, S. A., & Ladefoged, P. (2002). Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 193–228.Google Scholar

Clark, E. V. (2009). First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dinnsen, D. A., & Elbert, M. (1984). On the relationship between phonology and learning. ASHA Monographs, 22, 59–68.Google Scholar

Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315–330.Google Scholar

Eckman, F. R. (1981). On the naturalness of interlanguage phonological rules. Language Learning, 31, 195–216.Google Scholar

Eckman, F. R. (1984). Universals, typologies, and interlanguages. In Rutherford, W. E. (Ed.), Language universals and second language acquisition (pp. 79–105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, H. T. (2003). Applied phonetics: The sounds of American English (3rd ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson-Delmar Learning.Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. A. (1978). Phonological processes. In Greenberg, J, Ferguson, C, & Moravcsik, E (Eds.), Universals of human language: Vol. 2. Phonology (pp. 403–442). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1989). Chinese subjects’ perception of the word-final English /t/–/d/contrast: Performance before and after training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1684–1697.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1993). Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 1589–1608.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & Skelton, L. (1992). Production of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast by native speakers of English, Mandarin, and Spanish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 128–143.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. H. (1978). Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In Greenberg, J, Ferguson, C, & Moravcsik, E (Eds.), Universals of human language: Vol. 2. Phonology (pp. 243–279). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hanulikova, A., & Weber, A. (2010). Production of English interdental fricatives by Dutch, German, and English speakers. In New Sounds 2010: Sixth International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech (pp. 173–178). Poznan, Poland: Adam Mickiewicz University.Google Scholar

Harnsberger, J. D. (2001). On the relationship between identification and discrimination of non-native nasal consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 489–503.Google Scholar

Hawkins, J. A. (1987). Implicational universals as predictors of language acquisition. Linguistics, 25, 453–473.Google Scholar

Hume, E. (2011). Markedness. In van Oostendorp, M, Ewen, C, Hume, E, & Rice, K (Eds.), Companion to phonology (Vol. 1, pp. 79–106). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ingram, D., Christensen, L., Veach, S., & Webster, B. (1980). The acquisition of wordinitial fricatives and affricates in English between 2 and 6 years. In Yeni-Komshian, G, Kavanagh, J, & Ferguson, C (Eds.), Child phonology (pp. 169–192). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingram, J. C., & Park, S. G. (1998). Language, context, and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 1161–1174.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language aphasia and phonological universals. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Jongman, A., Wayland, R., & Wong, S. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1252–1263.Google Scholar

Kang, K. H., & Guion, S. G. (2006). Phonological systems in bilinguals: Age of learning effects on the stop consonant systems of Korean-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1672–1683.Google Scholar

Keating, P. A. (1984). Physiological effects on stop consonant voicing. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 59, 29–34.Google Scholar

Kim, H., & Jongman, A. (1996). Acoustic and perceptual evidence for complete neutralization of manner of articulation in Korean. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 295–312.Google Scholar

Klatt, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208–1221.Google Scholar

Lombardi, L. (2003). Second language data and constraints on manner: Explaining substitutions for the English interdentals. Second Language Research, 19, 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lisker, L. (1986). “Voicing” in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech, 29, 3–11.Google Scholar

Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maddieson, I. (2005). Presence of uncommon consonants. In Haspelmath, M, Dryer, M. S., Gil, D, & Comrie, B (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures (pp. 82–83). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Major, R. C., & Faudree, M. C. (1996). Markedness universals and the acquisition of voicing contrasts by Korean speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 69–90.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338–352.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. (1983). The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In MacNeilage, P. F. (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 189–216). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Park, H., & de Jong, K. J. (2008). Perceptual category mapping between English and Korean prevocalic obstruents: Evidence from mapping effects in second language identification skills. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 704–723.Google Scholar

Polka, L. (1991). Cross-language speech perception in adults: Phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2961–2977.Google Scholar

Polka, L., Colantonio, C., & Sundara, M. (2001). A cross-language comparison of /d/-/ð/ perception: Evidence for a new developmental pattern. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2190–2201.Google Scholar

Raphael, L. J. (1972). Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 1296–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rau, D. V., Chang, H. H. A., & Tarone, E. E. (2009). Think or sink: Chinese learners’ acquisition of the English voiceless interdental fricative. Language Learning, 59, 581–621.Google Scholar

Rochet, B. L., & Fei, Y. (1991). Effect of consonant and vowel context on Mandarin Chinese VOT: Production and perception. Canadian Acoustics, 19, 105–106.Google Scholar

Schmidt, A. M. (1996). Cross-language identification of consonants. Part 1. Korean perception of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 3201–3211.Google Scholar

Simon, E. (2009). Acquiring a new second language contrast: An analysis of the English laryngeal system of native speakers of Dutch. Second Language Research, 25, 377–408.Google Scholar

Studebaker, G. A. (1985). A “rationalized” arcsine transform. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 28, 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wardrip-Fruin, C. (1982). On the status of temporal cues to phonetic categories: Preceding vowel duration as a cue to voicing in final stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 187–195.Google Scholar

Wester, F., Gilbers, D., & Lowie, W. (2007). Substitution of dental fricatives in English by Dutch L2 speakers. Language Sciences, 29, 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 233–250.Google Scholar

Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2019a). An acoustic analysis of American English liquids by adults and children: Native English speakers and native Japanese speakers of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(4), 2671–2681.Google Scholar

Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Yamada, T., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2019b). Acoustical analysis of English voiceless fricatives by native Japanese adults and children (/f θ s/). Paper presented at the 130th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Louisville, KY.Google Scholar

Aoyama, K., & Guion, S. G. (2007). Prosody in second language acquisition: An acoustic analysis on duration and F0 range. In Bohn, O & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 281–297). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Aoyama, K., Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Yamada, T., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2008). The first years in an L2-speaking environment: A comparison of Japanese children and adults learning American English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46, 61–90.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.0.52) [Computer program]. Retrieved from www.praat.org/Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

Guion, S. G. (2003). The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second languages. Phonetica, 60, 98–128.Google Scholar

Guion, S. G. (2005). Knowledge of English word stress patterns in early and late Korean-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 503–533.Google Scholar

Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C. (2000a). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2711–2724.Google Scholar

Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Liu, S. H., & Yeni-Komshian, G. H. (2000b). Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 205–228.Google Scholar

Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., & Loftin, J. D. (2000c). The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 27–42.Google Scholar

Guion, S. G., Harada, T., & Clark, J. J. (2004). Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 207–226.Google Scholar

Jongman, A., Wayland, R., & Wong, S. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1252–1263.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K. (2015). A course in phonetics (7th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Lee, B., Guion, S. G., & Harada, T. (2006). Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 487–513.Google Scholar

Li, F. (2012). Language-specific developmental differences in speech production: A cross-language acoustic study. Child Development, 83, 1303–1315.Google Scholar

Li, F., Edwards, J., & Beckman, M. E. (2009). Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 111–124.Google Scholar

Maniwa, K., Wade, T., & Jongman, A. (2009). Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 3962–3973.Google Scholar

Oh, G. E., Guion-Anderson, S., Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2011). A one-year longitudinal study of English and Japanese vowel production by Japanese adults and children in an English-speaking setting. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 156–167.Google Scholar

Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.Google Scholar

Vance, T. (1987). An introduction to Japanese phonology. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G. (2003). Perceptual discrimination of Thai tones by naïve and experienced learners of Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 113–129.Google Scholar

Beddor, P. S. (1993). The perception of nasal vowels. In Huffman, M. K. & Krakow, R. A. (Eds.), Nasals, nasalization, and the velum (Phonetics and Phonology Vol. 5, pp. 171–196). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Beddor, P. S., & Krakow, R. A. (1999). Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: Evidence for partial compensation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2868–2887.Google Scholar

Beddor, P. S., Krakow, R. A., & Goldstein, L. M. (1986). Perceptual constraints and phonological change: A study of nasal vowel height. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 197–217.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1994). The emergence of language-specific phonemic influences in infant speech perception. In Goodman, J. G. & Nusbaum, H. C. (Eds.), The development of speech perception (pp. 167–224), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 171–204). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 345–360.Google Scholar

Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. (1992). The production of new and similar vowels by adult German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 131–158.Google Scholar

Boomershine, A. (2013). The perception of English vowels by monolingual, bilingual, and heritage speakers of Spanish and English. In Selected proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 103–118). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

Bundgaard-Nielsen, R., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2011). Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 223–277). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 1–34.Google Scholar

Fox, A. R., Flege, J. E., & Munro, M. J. (1995). The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 2540–2551.Google Scholar

Frieda, E., & Nozawa, T. (2007). You are what you eat phonetically: The effect of linguistic experience on the perception of foreign vowels. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 79–96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Harnsberger, J. D. (2001). On the relationship between identification and discrimination of non-native nasal consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 489–503.Google Scholar

Hillenbrand, J. M., Clark, M. J., & Nearey, T. M. (2001). Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 748–763.Google Scholar

Ingram, J. C. L., & Park, S.-G. (1997). Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 343–370.Google Scholar

Johnson, K. (1997). Acoustic and auditory phonetics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kasahara, K., Machida, N., Osada, E., Takahashi, T., & Yoshizawa, S. (2012). Vocabulary knowledge of 5th and 6th graders at elementary school: Connection between sound, meaning and spelling. JES Journal, 12, 90–101.Google Scholar

Krakow, R. A., Beddor, P. S., Goldstein, L. M., & Fowler, C. A. (1988). Coarticulatory influence on the perceived height of nasal vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 1146–1158.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (2010). Principles of linguistic change: Cognitive and cultural factors. West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2005). Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. (2003). Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. (2005). A course in phonetics (5th ed.). Boston: Thomson.Google Scholar

Lengeris, A. (2009). Perceptual assimilation and L2 learning: Evidence from the perception of southern British English vowels by native speakers of Greek and Japanese. Phonetica, 66, 169–187.Google Scholar

Levy, E. S. (2009). Language experience and consonantal context effects on perceptual assimilation of French vowels by American-English learners of French. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 1138–1152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morrison, G. S. (2002). Japanese listeners’ use of duration cues in the identification of English high front vowels. In Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 189–200).Google Scholar

Nozawa, T. (2018). How native speakers of Japanese and American English label vowels of each other’s L1 in terms of their L1 vowel categories. Research on Phonetic Language, 12, 39–54.Google Scholar

Nozawa, T. (2019). Effects of the manner of articulation of the syllable-final consonant on the perception of American English vowels by native Japanese speakers: Divergence between Japanese Speakers’ image of English vowels and what English vowels really sound like to them. PhD dissertation, Osaka University.Google Scholar

Nozawa, T., & Cheon, S. Y. (2017). Identification of vowels of two different varieties of English by native speakers of Japanese and Korean. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141, 3519 (abstract).Google Scholar

Nozawa, T., & Frieda, E. M. (2007). Perceptual similarity of American English and Japanese vowels for native speakers of American English and Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 3529 (abstract).Google Scholar

Nozawa, T., & Wayland, R. (2012). Effects of consonantal contexts on the discrimination and identification of American English vowels by native speakers of Japanese. Journal of the Japan Society of Speech Sciences, 13, 19–39.Google Scholar

Olive, J. P., Greenwood, A., & Coleman, J. (1993). Acoustics of American English speech. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Polka, L. (1992). Characterizing the influence of native language experience on adult speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 1, 37–52.Google Scholar

Polka, L. (1995). Linguistic influence in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1286–1296.Google Scholar

Quackenbush, E. (1974). How Japanese English words. Linguistics – An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences, 131, 59–85.Google Scholar

Roeder, R. (2010). Effects of consonantal context on the pronunciation of /æ/ in the English of speakers of Mexican heritage from South Central Michigan. In Preston, D. R. & Niedzielski, N (Eds.), A reader in sociophonetics (pp. 71–89). New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Strange, W., Akahane-Yamada, R., Kubo, R., Trent, S. A., & Nishi, K. (2001). Effects of consonantal context on perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1691–1704.Google Scholar

Strange, W., Akahane-Yamada, R., Kubo, R., Trent, S. A., Nishi, K., & Jenkins, J. J. (1998). Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 311–344.Google Scholar

Tanowitz, J., & Beddor, P. S. (1997). Temporal characteristics of coarticulatory vowel nasalization in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 3194 (abstract).Google Scholar

Tyler, M. D., Best, C. T., Faber, A., & Levitt, A. G. (2014). Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts. Phonetica, 71, 4–21.Google Scholar

Wright, J. T. (1986). The behavior of nasalized vowels in the perceptual vowel space. In Ohara, J. J. & Jaeger, J. J. (Eds.), Experimental phonology (pp. 45–67). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar