Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:38:23.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - English Obstruent Perception by Native Mandarin, Korean, and English Speakers

from Part II - Segmental Acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

By
Yen-Chen Hao  and
Kenneth de Jong
Edited by
Ratree Wayland
Ratree Wayland
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

This study investigates the perceptual accuracy of eight English obstruents in the onset and coda position by Mandarin and Korean-speaking L2 learners and by a control group of native English speakers. According to the current theoretical models on second language speech learning, L1 Mandarin and Korean speakers are expected to differ in their perception of English obstruents due to the different correspondence between their respective L1 obstruents and those in English. On the other hand, theories based on intrinsic differences in the difficulty of different linguistic skills imply that some L2 sounds would be more difficult than others regardless of the L1 background. The results showed that all three groups were significantly more accurate in perceiving obstruents in the onset than in the coda position, voiceless than voiced targets, stops than fricatives, and labials than coronals. /θ/ and /ð/ were particularly poorly identified. The two learner groups were equally accurate in the onset position, but the Mandarin group outperformed the Korean group in the coda position. Regarding the specific obstruents, some patterns were predicted by mapping to the L1. Nonetheless, the general similarity between the two groups suggests a robust and pervasive language-independent tendency in speech perception.

Keywords

MandarinEnglishKoreanObstruentPerceptionMappingLanguageIndependentSimilarity
Type
Chapter
Information
Second Language Speech Learning
Theoretical and Empirical Progress
 , pp. 195 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altenberg, E. P., & Vago, R. M. (1983). Theoretical implications of an error analysis of second language phonology production. Language Learning, 33, 427–447.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C.T., and Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. and Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: Benjamin.Google Scholar
Blevins, J. (2006). A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics, 32, 117–166.Google Scholar
Brannen, K. (2002). The role of perception in differential substitution. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 47, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broersma, M. (2005). Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 3890–3901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broselow, E., Chen, S. I., & Wang, C. (1998). The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 261–280.Google Scholar
Calabrese, A. (1995). A constraint-based theory of phonological markedness and simplification procedures. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 373–463.Google Scholar
Chao, K. Y., & Chen, L. M. (2008). A cross-linguistic study of voice onset time in stop consonant productions. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 13, 215–232.Google Scholar
Cho, T., & Keating, P. A. (2001). Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 155–190.Google Scholar
Cho, T., Jun, S. A., & Ladefoged, P. (2002). Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 193–228.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (2009). First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A., & Elbert, M. (1984). On the relationship between phonology and learning. ASHA Monographs, 22, 59–68.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315–330.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (1981). On the naturalness of interlanguage phonological rules. Language Learning, 31, 195–216.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (1984). Universals, typologies, and interlanguages. In Rutherford, W. E. (Ed.), Language universals and second language acquisition (pp. 79–105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, H. T. (2003). Applied phonetics: The sounds of American English (3rd ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson-Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1978). Phonological processes. In Greenberg, J, Ferguson, C, & Moravcsik, E (Eds.), Universals of human language: Vol. 2. Phonology (pp. 403–442). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1989). Chinese subjects’ perception of the word-final English /t/–/d/contrast: Performance before and after training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1684–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1993). Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 1589–1608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & Skelton, L. (1992). Production of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast by native speakers of English, Mandarin, and Spanish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 128–143.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1978). Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In Greenberg, J, Ferguson, C, & Moravcsik, E (Eds.), Universals of human language: Vol. 2. Phonology (pp. 243–279). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanulikova, A., & Weber, A. (2010). Production of English interdental fricatives by Dutch, German, and English speakers. In New Sounds 2010: Sixth International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech (pp. 173–178). Poznan, Poland: Adam Mickiewicz University.Google Scholar
Harnsberger, J. D. (2001). On the relationship between identification and discrimination of non-native nasal consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 489–503.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1987). Implicational universals as predictors of language acquisition. Linguistics, 25, 453–473.Google Scholar
Hume, E. (2011). Markedness. In van Oostendorp, M, Ewen, C, Hume, E, & Rice, K (Eds.), Companion to phonology (Vol. 1, pp. 79–106). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ingram, D., Christensen, L., Veach, S., & Webster, B. (1980). The acquisition of wordinitial fricatives and affricates in English between 2 and 6 years. In Yeni-Komshian, G, Kavanagh, J, & Ferguson, C (Eds.), Child phonology (pp. 169–192). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, J. C., & Park, S. G. (1998). Language, context, and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 1161–1174.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language aphasia and phonological universals. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jongman, A., Wayland, R., & Wong, S. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1252–1263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, K. H., & Guion, S. G. (2006). Phonological systems in bilinguals: Age of learning effects on the stop consonant systems of Korean-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1672–1683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keating, P. A. (1984). Physiological effects on stop consonant voicing. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 59, 29–34.Google Scholar
Kim, H., & Jongman, A. (1996). Acoustic and perceptual evidence for complete neutralization of manner of articulation in Korean. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 295–312.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208–1221.Google Scholar
Lombardi, L. (2003). Second language data and constraints on manner: Explaining substitutions for the English interdentals. Second Language Research, 19, 225–250.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. (1986). “Voicing” in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech, 29, 3–11.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, I. (2005). Presence of uncommon consonants. In Haspelmath, M, Dryer, M. S., Gil, D, & Comrie, B (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures (pp. 82–83). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Major, R. C., & Faudree, M. C. (1996). Markedness universals and the acquisition of voicing contrasts by Korean speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338–352.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. (1983). The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In MacNeilage, P. F. (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 189–216). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Park, H., & de Jong, K. J. (2008). Perceptual category mapping between English and Korean prevocalic obstruents: Evidence from mapping effects in second language identification skills. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 704–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polka, L. (1991). Cross-language speech perception in adults: Phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2961–2977.Google Scholar
Polka, L., Colantonio, C., & Sundara, M. (2001). A cross-language comparison of /d/-/ð/ perception: Evidence for a new developmental pattern. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2190–2201.Google Scholar
Raphael, L. J. (1972). Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 1296–1303.Google Scholar
Rau, D. V., Chang, H. H. A., & Tarone, E. E. (2009). Think or sink: Chinese learners’ acquisition of the English voiceless interdental fricative. Language Learning, 59, 581–621.Google Scholar
Rochet, B. L., & Fei, Y. (1991). Effect of consonant and vowel context on Mandarin Chinese VOT: Production and perception. Canadian Acoustics, 19, 105–106.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. M. (1996). Cross-language identification of consonants. Part 1. Korean perception of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 3201–3211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, E. (2009). Acquiring a new second language contrast: An analysis of the English laryngeal system of native speakers of Dutch. Second Language Research, 25, 377–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studebaker, G. A. (1985). A “rationalized” arcsine transform. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 28, 455–462.Google Scholar
Wardrip-Fruin, C. (1982). On the status of temporal cues to phonetic categories: Preceding vowel duration as a cue to voicing in final stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wester, F., Gilbers, D., & Lowie, W. (2007). Substitution of dental fricatives in English by Dutch L2 speakers. Language Sciences, 29, 477–491.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×