Baese-Berk, M. M. (2019). Interactions between speech perception and production during learning of novel phonemic categories. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 81(4), 981–1005.Google Scholar

Bauman, J., Blodgett, A., Rytting, C. A., & Shamoo, J. (2009). The ups and downs of Vietnamese tones: A description of native speaker and adult learner tone systems for Northern and Southern Vietnamese (Technical Report No. E.5.3 TTO 2118). College Park, MD: University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James E. Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bettoni-Techio, M., Rauber, A. S., & Koerich, R. D. (2007). Perception and production of word-final alveolar stops by Brazilian Portuguese learners of English. In INTERSPEECH 2007 (pp. 2293–2296), Antwerp.Google Scholar

Blodgett, A., Bauman, J., Bowles, A., & Winn, M. B. (2008). A comparison of native speaker and American adult learner Vietnamese lexical tones. In Proceedings of Acoustics 08 (pp. 688–692), Paris.Google Scholar

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.4.08).Google Scholar

Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E. (1997). Perception and production of a new vowel category by second-language learners. In James, A & Leather, J (Eds.), Second-language speech: Structure and process (pp. 53–74). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunelle, M. (2015). Vietnamese (Tiếng Việt). In Jenny, M & Sidwell, P (Eds.), The handbook of Austroasiatic languages (Vol. 2, pp. 909–953). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Burnham, D., & Francis, E. (1997). The role of linguistic experience in the perception of Thai tones. In Abramson, A. S. (Ed.), Southeast Asian linguistics studies in honor of Vichin Panupong (pp. 29–48). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar

Byun, T. M., & Tiede, M. (2017). Perception-production relations in later development of American English rhotics. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0172022.Google Scholar

Chambers, E. W., de Verdière, Colin, Erickson, É, Lazard, J, Lazarus, S, F., & Thite, S. (2010). Homotopic Fréchet distance between curves or, walking your dog in the woods in polynomial time. Computational Geometry, 43(3), 295–311.Google Scholar

Chen, G. (1974). The pitch range of English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2(2), 159–171.Google Scholar

Ding, H., Hoffmann, R., & Jokisch, O. (2011). An investigation of tone perception and production in German learners of Mandarin. Archives of Acoustics, 36(3). doi:10.2478/v10168-011-0036-6Google Scholar

Giang, Đinh Lư. (2011). Tình hình song ngữ Khmer-Việt tại đồng bằng sông Cửu Long: một số vấn đề lý thuyết và thực tiễn [Khmer-Vietnamese bilingualism in the Mekong Delta: Theoretical and practical issues]. PhD dissertation, Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar

Giang, Đinh Lư. (2015). Các đặc điểm chính của song ngữ Khmer-Việt vùng Nam Bộ [The main features of Khmer-Vietnamese bilingualism in the South]. Ngôn ngữ & Đời sóng, 4(234), 81–88.Google Scholar

Elvin, J., Williams, D., & Escudero, P. (2016). The relationship between perception and production of Brazilian Portuguese vowels in European Spanish monolinguals. Loquens, 3(2), e031.Google Scholar

Escudero, P. R. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1993). Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(3), 1589–1608.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1999). The relation between L2 production and perception. In Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (pp. 1273–1276), Berkeley.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987.Google Scholar

Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Ma, L., & Fenn, K. (2008). Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 268–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gandour, J. T. (1983). Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149–175.Google Scholar

General Statistics Office of Vietnam. (2010). The 2009 Vietnam population and housing census: Major findings. Hanoi: General Statistics Office of Vietnam. Retrieved from www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=515&idmid=5&ItemID=9813Google Scholar

Ghosh, S. S., Matthies, M. L., Maas, E., … Perkell, J. S. (2010). An investigation of the relation between sibilant production and somatosensory and auditory acuity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(5), 3079–3087.Google Scholar

Guenther, F. H., & Perkell, J. S. (2004). A neural model of speech production and supporting experiments. In From sound to sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech communication (pp. B98–B106). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Guion, S. G., & Pederson, E. (2007). Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 57–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hallé, P. A., Chang, Y.-C., & Best, C. T. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32(3), 395–421.Google Scholar

Châu, Hoàng Thị. (1989). Tiếng Việt trên các miền đất nước: Phương ngữ học [Vietnamese in the various areas of the motherland: A dialectological study]. Hà Nội: NXB Khoa học Xã hội.Google Scholar

Huang, T. (2007). Perception of Mandarin tones by Chinese-and English-speaking listeners. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1797–1800), Saarbrücken.Google Scholar

Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2015). The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(2), 817–832.Google Scholar

Kirby, J. (2014). Incipient tonogenesis in Phnom Penh Khmer: Acoustic and perceptual studies. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 69–85.Google Scholar

Kirby, J., & Giang, Đinh Lư. (2017). On the r>h shift in Kiên Giang Khmer. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 10(2), 66–85.Google Scholar

Lee, Y.-S., Vakoch, D. A., & Wurm, L. H. (1996). Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(5), 527–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levy, E. S., & Law, F. F. (2010). Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationship. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(3), 1290–1305.Google Scholar

Llisterri, J. (1995). Relationships between speech production and speech perception in a second language. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 92–99), Stockholm.Google Scholar

Mennen, I. (1998). Can language learners ever acquire the intonation of a second language? In STiLL-1998 (pp. 17–20), Marholmen, Sweden.Google Scholar

Miracle, W. C. (1989). Tone production of American students of Chinese: A preliminary acoustic study. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24, 49–65.Google Scholar

Morrison, G. S. (2003). Perception and production of Spanish vowels by English speakers. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1533–1536), Barcelona.Google Scholar

Müller, M. (2007). Dynamic time warping. In Information retrieval for music and motion (pp. 69–84). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Nagle, C. L. (2018). Examining the temporal structure of the perception-production link in second language acquisition: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 68(1), 234–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nguyen, H. T., & Macken, M. A. (2008). Factors affecting the production of Vietnamese tones: A study of American learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(1), 49–77.Google Scholar

Huệ, Nguyễn Thị. (2010). Tiếp xúc ngôn ngữ giữa tiếng Khmer với tiếng Việt (trường hợp tỉnh Trà Vinh) [Language contact between Khmer and and Vietnamese in Tra Vinh province]. PhD dissertation, Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar

Lợi, Nguyễn Văn & Edmondson, J. A. (1998). Tone and voice quality in modern northern Vietnamese: Instrumental case studies. Mon-Khmer Studies, 28, 1–18.Google Scholar

Peperkamp, S., & Bouchon, C. (2011). The relation between perception and production in L2 phonological processing. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 161–164), Florence.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., Lane, H., … Zandipour, M. (2004). The distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4), 2338–2344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Phạm, A. H. (2003). Vietnamese tone: A new analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sakai, M., & Moorman, C. (2018). Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187–224.Google Scholar

Sheldon, A., & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3(3), 243–261.Google Scholar

So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293.Google Scholar

Sochoeun, C. (2006). Khmer Krom migration and their identity. MA thesis, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh.Google Scholar

Strange, W. (1995). Phonetics of second-language acquisition: Past, present, future. In Branderud, P & Elenius, K (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 76–83), Stockholm.Google Scholar

Minh, Thạch Ngọc. (1999). Monosyllabization in Kiengiang Khmer. Mon-Khmer Studies, 29, 81–95.Google Scholar

Phương, Vũ Thanh. (1982). Phonetic properties of Vietnamese tones across dialects. In Bradley, D (Ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian linguistics: No. 8. Tonation (pp. 55–76). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 1033–1043.Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (2012). L2 acquisition and processing of Mandarin tones. In Li, P, Tan, L. H., Bates, E, & Tzeng, O. J. L. (Eds.), Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics: Vol. 1. Chinese (pp. 250–256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. (2003). Perceptual discrimination of Thai tones by naive and experienced learners of Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(01), 113–129.Google Scholar

Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54(4), 681–712.Google Scholar

Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(6), 1866–1878.Google Scholar

Yang, B. (2012). The gap between the perception and production of tones by American learners of Mandarin – an intralingual perspective. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 1(1), 33–53.Google Scholar

Yang, B. (2015). Perception and production of Mandarin tones by native speakers and L2 learners. Berlin: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44645-4Google Scholar

Zimmerer, F., Jügler, J., Andreeva, B., Möbius, B., & Trouvain, J. (2014). Too cautious to vary more? A comparison of pitch variation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 1037–1041), Dublin.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. E. (1973). Intrinsic F 0 in vowels: Physiological correlates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53(1), 346.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. E. (1978). Correlation analysis of the physiological factors controlling fundamental voice frequency. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63(1), 211–222.Google Scholar

Baills, F., Suárez-González, N., González-Fuente, S., & Prieto, P. (2019). Observing and producing pitch gestures facilitates the learning of Mandarin Chinese tones and words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 33–58.Google Scholar

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.48. Retrieved from www.praat.org/Google Scholar

Chen, S., Wiltshire, C., Li, B., & Wayland, R. (2019). A quantitative analysis of tone sandhi in Mandarin and Nanjing Chinese based on surface pitch contours and underlying pitch targets. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 6.Google Scholar

Chen, S., Zhang, C., McCollum, A. G., & Wayland, R. (2017). Statistical modelling of phonetic and phonologised perturbation effects in tonal and non-tonal languages. Speech Communication, 88, 17–38.Google Scholar

Cheng, X. 程潇 (2011). 浅析外国留学生习得汉语声调的难点及教学策略 [Primary analysis of foreign students’ difficulty with Chinese tone acquisition and instructional strategies]. Retrieved from www.lwlm.com/yuyanxue/201102/542663.htmGoogle Scholar

Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallé, P. A. (1994).Evidence for tone-specific activity of the sternohyoid muscle in modern standard Chinese. Language and Speech, 37(2), 103–123.Google Scholar

Hao, Y.-C. (2012). Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 269–279.Google Scholar

Hualde, J. I., & Prieto, P. (2015). Intonational variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. In Frota, S & Prieto, P (Eds.), Intonation in romance (pp. 350–439). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kasisopa, B., El-Khoury Antonios, L., Jongman, A., Sereno, J. A., & Burnham, D. (2018). Training children to perceive non-native lexical tones: Tone language background, bilingualism, and auditory-visual information. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1508.Google Scholar

Kim, J., Dewey, D. P., Baker-Smemoe, W., Ring, S., Westover, A., & Eggett, D. L. (2015). L2 development during study abroad in China. System, 55, 123–133.Google Scholar

Leather, J. (1996). Interrelation of perceptual and productive learning in the initial acquisition of second-language tone. In James, A & Leather, L (Eds.), Second-language speech: Structure and process (pp. 75–101). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1977). The acquisition of tone in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 4(2), 185–199.Google Scholar

Li, M., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). Perception practice, production practice, and musical ability in L2-Mandarin tone-word learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 593–620.Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Wang, M., Perfetti, C. A., Brubaker, B., Wu, S., & MacWhinney, B. (2011). Learning a tonal language by attending to the tone: An in vivo experiment. Language Learning, 61, 1119–1141.Google Scholar

Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Mirman, D., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 475–494.Google Scholar

Morett, L. M., & Chang, L.-Y. (2015). Emphasising sound and meaning: Pitch gestures enhance Mandarin lexical tone acquisition. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30(3), 347–353.Google Scholar

Ohala, J. J. (1978). Production of tone. In Tone (pp. 5–39). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Pike, K. L. (1948). Tone languages: A technique for determining the number and type of pitch contrasts in a language, with studies of tonemic substitution and fusion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Rose, P. (1987). Considerations in the normalization of the fundamental frequency of linguistic tone. Speech Communication, 6, 343–352.Google Scholar

So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tsukada, K., Xu, H., & Rattanasone, N. (2015). The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by listeners from different linguistic backgrounds. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 4(2), 141–161.Google Scholar

Wang, Y. J. (1995). Ye tan meiguo ren xuexi hanyu shengdiao [On American learners’ tone acquisition]. Language Teaching and Research, 2, 126–140.Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 1033–1043.Google Scholar

Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54(4), 681–712.Google Scholar

Wong, P. (2008). Development of lexical tone production in disyllabic words by 2-to 6-year-old Mandarin-speaking children. PhD dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar

Wong, P. (2012a). Acoustic characteristics of three-year-olds’ correct and incorrect monosyllabic Mandarin lexical tone productions. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 141–151.Google Scholar

Wong, P. (2012b). Monosyllabic Mandarin tone productions by 3-year-olds growing up in Taiwan and in the United States: Interjudge reliability and perceptual results. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(5), 1423–1437.Google Scholar

Wong, P., Schwartz, R. G., & Jenkins, J. J. (2005). Perception and production of lexical tones by 3-year-old, Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 48, 1065–1079. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/074)Google Scholar

Xu, L., Chen, X., Zhou, N., Li, Y., Zhao, X., & Han, D. (2007). Recognition of lexical tone production of children with an artificial neural network. Acta Otolaryngologica, 127(4), 365–369.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. (2013). ProsodyPro – A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. In Tools and resources for the analysis of speech prosody (TRASP 2013) (pp. 7–10). Aix-en-Provence, France.Google Scholar

Xu, Y., & Wang, Q. E. (2001). Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Speech Communication, 33, 319–337.Google Scholar

Yang, B. (2015). Perception and production of Mandarin tones by native speakers and L2 learners. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yip, M. J. W. (2002). Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zhu, X. N. (1999). Shanghai tonetics. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar

Archibald, J. (1992). Transfer of L1 parameter settings: Some empirical evidence from Polish metrics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 301–339.Google Scholar

Archibald, J. (1993). The learnability of English metrical parameters by adult Spanish speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching, 31/32, 129–142.Google Scholar

Beckman, M. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2007). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.6.05) [Computer program].Google Scholar

Chrabaszcz, A., Winn, M., Lin, C. Y., & Idsardi, W. J. (2014). Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin, and Russian speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 1468–1479. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0279Google Scholar

Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45, 207–228. doi:10.1177/00238309020450030101Google Scholar

Cutler, A. (2005). Lexical stress. In Pisoni, D & Remez, R (Eds.), Handbook of speech perception (pp. 264–289). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cutler, A. (2015). Lexical stress in English pronunciation. In Reed, M & Levis, J. M. (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 106–124). Chichester, England: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(1), 113–121.Google Scholar

De Jong, K., & Zawaydeh, B. (1999). Stress, duration and intonation in Arabic word-level prosody. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 3–22.Google Scholar

Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastian, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406–421.Google Scholar

Dupoux, E., Sebastian-Galles, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106, 682–706.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1981). The phonological basis of foreign accent: A hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 15(4), 443–455.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.Google Scholar

Flege, J., & Bohn, O. (1989). In instrumental study of vowel reduction and stress placement in Spanish-accented English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 35–62.Google Scholar

Folkes, J., & Bond, Z. (1989). The vowels of stressed and unstressed syllables in nonnative English. Language Learning, 39, 341–373.Google Scholar

Fry, D. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4), 765–768.Google Scholar

Fry, D. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1, 126–152.Google Scholar

Guion, S. G. (2005). Knowledge of English word stress patterns in early and late Korean-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 503–533.Google Scholar

Guion, S. G., Clark, J. J., Harada, T., & Wayland, R. P. (2003). Factors affecting stress placement for English non-words include syllabic structure, lexical class, and stress patterns of phonologically similar words. Language and Speech, 46, 403–427.Google Scholar

Guion, S. G., Harada, T., & Clark, J. J. (2004). Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 7, 207–226.Google Scholar

Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hyman, L. (1978). Tone and/or accent. In Napoli, D. J. (Ed.), Elements of tone, stress, and intonation (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2014). Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 793–808.Google Scholar

Jesse, A., Poellmann, K., & Kong, Y-Y. (2017). English listeners use suprasegmental cues to lexical stress early during spoken word recognition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 1–9.Google Scholar

Lehiste, I., & Fox, R. A. (1992). Perception of prominence by Estonian and English listeners. Language and Speech, 35, 419–434.Google Scholar

Lieberman, P. (1960). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 451–454.Google Scholar

Lin, C. Y., Wang, M. I. N., Idsardi, W. J., & Xu, Y. I. (2014). Stress processing in Mandarin and Korean second language learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 316–346. doi:10.1017/s1366728913000333Google Scholar

Mattys, S. L. (2000). The perception of primary and secondary stress in English. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 253–265.Google Scholar

Mattys, S. L., & Samuel, A. G. (2000). Implications of stress-pattern differences in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 571–596.Google Scholar

Nasr, R. T. (1960). Phonemic length in Lebanese Arabic. Phonetica, 5, 209–211.Google Scholar

Nespor, M., Shukla, M., & Mehler, J. (2011). Stress-timed vs. syllable-timed languages. In van Oostendorp, M, Ewen, C, Hume, E, & Rice, K (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology (pp. 1147–1159). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ortega-Llebaria, M., Gu, H., & Fan, J. (2013). English speakers’ perception of Spanish lexical stress: Context-driven L2 stress perception. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 186–197. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.006Google Scholar

Peperkamp, S., & Dupoux, E. (2002). A typological study of stress deafness. In Gussenhoven, C (Ed.), Proceedings of laboratory phonology 7 (pp. 203–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, D. (1986). Tone in lexical phonology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.Google Scholar

Reinisch, E., Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2010). Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: Lexical stress drives eye movements immediately. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 772–783. doi:10.1080/17470210903104412.Google Scholar

Sereno, J., & Jongman, A. (1995). Acoustic correlates of grammatical class. Language and Speech, 38, 57–76.Google Scholar

Sluijter, A. M. C., & van Heuven, V. J. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2471–2485.Google Scholar

Teng, E. (2001). The use of stress and vowel reduction by Chinese learners of English. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Thelwall, R., & Saadeddin, M. (1990). Arabic. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 20, 37–39.Google Scholar

Ueyama, M. (2000). Prosodic transfer: An acoustic study of L2 English versus L2 Japanese. PhD thesis, UCLA.Google Scholar

van der Hulst, H., & Smith, N. (1988). Autosegmental studies on pitch accent. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris.Google Scholar

Wayland, R., & Guion, S. (2003). Perceptual discrimination of Thai tones by naive and experienced learners of Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 113–129.Google Scholar

Wayland, R., Guion, S. G., & Landfair, B. L. (2006). Native Thai speakers’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 285–304.Google Scholar

Yu, V., & Andruski, J. E. (2010). A cross-language study of perception of lexical stress in English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 323–344.Google Scholar

Yu, V., & Andruski, J. E. (2011). The effect of language experience on perception of stress typicality in English nouns and verbs. The Mental Lexicon, 6(2), 275–301.Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., & Francis, A. (2010). The weighting of vowel quality in native and non-native listeners’ perception of English lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 260–271. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2009.11.00Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Nissen, S., & Francis, A. (2008). Acoustic characteristics of English lexical stress produced by native Mandarin speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), 4498–4513.Google Scholar

Adank, P., Evans, B. G., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S. K. (2009). Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 520–529. doi:10.1037/a0013552Google Scholar

Baese-Berk, M. M., Bradlow, A. R., & Wright, B. A. (2013). Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3), EL174–EL180. doi:10.1121/1.4789864Google Scholar

Baese-Berk, M. M., & Morrill, T. H. (2015). Speaking rate consistency in native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(3), EL223–EL228. doi:10.1121/1.4929622Google Scholar

Baker, R. E., & Bradlow, A. R. (2009). Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody. Language and Speech, 52(4), 391–413. doi:10.1177/0023830909336575Google Scholar

Baker, R. E., Baese-Berk, M., Bonnasse-Gahot, L., Kim, M., Van Engen, K. J., & Bradlow, A. R. (2011). Word durations in non-native English. Journal of Phonetics, 39(1), 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.10.006Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementaries. In Bohn, O. S. (Ed.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (Vols. 1–2, pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Borrie, S. A., McAuliffe, M. J., & Liss, J. M. (2012). Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: A review of experimental studies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(1), 290–305. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0349)Google Scholar

Bradlow, A. R. (n.d.). SpeechBox. Retrieved from https://speechbox.linguistics.northwestern.eduGoogle Scholar

Bradlow, A. R., & Alexander, J. A. (2007). Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), 2339. doi:10.1121/1.2642103Google Scholar

Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–729. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005Google Scholar

Bradlow, A. R., Blasingame, M., & Lee, K. (2018). Language-independent talker-specificity in bilingual speech intelligibility: Individual traits persist across first-language and second-language speech. Laboratory Phonology, 9(1).Google Scholar

Bradlow, A. R., Kim, M., & Blasingame, M. (2017). Language-independent talker-specificity in first-language and second-language speech production by bilingual talkers: L1 speaking rate predicts L2 speaking rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(2), 886–899. doi:10.1121/1.4976044Google Scholar

Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(6), 3647–3658. doi:10.1121/1.1815131Google Scholar

Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002Google Scholar

De Jong, N. H., Groenhout, R., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 223–243.Google Scholar

Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 533–557.Google Scholar

Escudero, P. (2009). Linguistic perception of “similar” L2 sounds. Phonology in Perception, 15, 152–190.Google Scholar

Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(5), 1241–1255. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/087)Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=related:OXsRS-F20TEJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&num=20&as_sdt=0,5&as_ylo=1995&as_yhi=1995Google Scholar

Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Liu, S. H., & Yeni-Komshian, G. H. (2000). Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(2), 205–228.Google Scholar

Holt, R. F., & Bent, T. (2017). Children’s use of semantic context in perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(1), 223–230. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0014Google Scholar

International Phonetic Association (IPA). (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ivanova, I., & Costa, A. (2008). Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 277–288. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.06.003Google Scholar

Kim, M., Horton, W. S., & Bradlow, A. R. (2011). Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), 125–156. doi:10.1515/labphon.2011.004Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 119–135. doi:10.1017/S1366728906002483Google Scholar

Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R., & Scott, S. K. (2012). Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(7–8), 953–978. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.705006Google Scholar

McGowan, K. B. (2015). Social expectation improves speech perception in noise. Language and Speech, 58(4), 502–521. doi:10.1177/0023830914565191Google Scholar

McLaughlin, D. J., & Van Engen, K. J. (2020). Task-evoked pupil response for accurately-recognized accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(2), EL151–156. doi:10.31234/osf.io/vx2tyGoogle Scholar

Mok, P., & Dellwo, V. (2008). Comparing native and non-native speech rhythm using acoustic rhythmic measures: Cantonese, Beijing Mandarin and English. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody (pp. 423–426). Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar

Morrill, T., Baese-Berk, M., & Bradlow, A. (2016). Speaking rate consistency and variability in spontaneous speech by native and non-native speakers of English. doi:10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-230Google Scholar

Porretta, V., Kyröläinen, A.-J., & Tucker, B. V. (2015). Perceived foreign accentedness: Acoustic distances and lexical properties. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 77(7), 2438–2451. doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0916-3Google Scholar

Porretta, V., Tremblay, A., & Bolger, P. (2017). Got experience? PMN amplitudes to foreign-accented speech modulated by listener experience. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 54–67. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.03.002Google Scholar

Porretta, V., Tucker, B. V., & Järvikivi, J. (2016). The influence of gradient foreign accentedness and listener experience on word recognition. Journal of Phonetics, 58, 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2016.05.006Google Scholar

Romero-Rivas, C., Martin, C. D., & Costa, A. (2015). Processing changes when listening to foreign-accented speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(181), Article 167. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00167Google Scholar

Schmale, R., Hollich, G., & Seidl, A. (2011). Contending with foreign accent in early word learning. Journal of Child Language, 38(5), 1096–1108. doi:10.1017/S0305000910000619Google Scholar

Sidaras, S. K., Alexander, J. E. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2009). Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(5), 3306–3316.Google Scholar

Towell, R., & Dewaele, J. M. (2005). The role of psycholinguistic factors in the development of fluency amongst advanced learners of French. In Dewaele, J. M. (Ed.), Focus on French as a foreign language (pp. 210–239). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M. M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R. (2010). The Wildcat corpus of native-and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language and Speech, 53(4), 510–540. doi:10.1177/0023830910372495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Van Engen, K. J., & Peelle, J. E. (2014). Listening effort and accented speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00577Google Scholar

Van Engen, K. J., Phelps, J. E. B., Smiljanic, R., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2014). Enhancing speech intelligibility: Interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(5), 1908–1911. doi:10.1044/JSLHR-H-13-0076Google Scholar

Vaughn, C., Baese-Berk, M., & Idemaru, K. (2019). Re-examining phonetic variability in native and non-native speech. Phonetica, 76, 327–358. doi:10.1159/000487269Google Scholar

Wade, T., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2007). Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech sounds. Phonetica, 64(2–3), 122–144. doi:10.1159/000107913Google Scholar

Weinberger, S. H. (n.d.). The Speech Accent Archive. George Mason University. Retrieved from http://accent.gmu.edu/Google Scholar

Witteman, M. J., Weber, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2013). Tolerance for inconsistency in foreign-accented speech. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21(2), 512–519. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0519-8Google Scholar

Xie, X., & Fowler, C. A. (2013). Listening with a foreign-accent: The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit in Mandarin speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 41(5), 369–378.Google Scholar