Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:48:40.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Testing Methods and Wind Tunnels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Corin Segal
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Introduction

At Mach 5, the stagnation temperature approaches the structural limit acceptable for full simulation and continuous operation of a ground-based wind tunnel. With considerable effort, long-duration wind-tunnel operation could be extended beyond this figure and, in fact, several capabilities exist in different places around the world. Experimental conditions above Mach 10 can be duplicated only in short-duration facilities, so the topics studied in these devices must be carefully selected to ensure that the physical processes to be reproduced are compatible with those experienced in flight. Much of the hypersonic flight domain remains to be covered through theoretical analysis and, most likely limited, flight testing.

Despite the practical difficulties, considerable progress has been made through experimental studies, in particular in the domain covering the transition from ramjet to scramjet operation, in the range of Mach 4–6. Beyond this range, several short-duration flights were performed using boosters; basic studies were undertaken in shock and expansion tubes at high Mach numbers.

The following is a brief summary, mostly of the hypersonic simulation requirements and the capabilities offered by typical experimental facilities. Of the numerous studies completed in ground facilities around the world, only a few are referenced here as examples. For detailed reviews of current facilities and experimental programs, the volumes edited by Curran and Murthy (2000) and Lu and Marren (2002), as well as the review by Arnold and Wendt (1996) and the RAND report by Anton et al. (2004), are particularly recommended.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Scramjet Engine
Processes and Characteristics
, pp. 215 - 228
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anton, P. S., Johnson, D. J., Block, M., Brown, M., Drezner, J., Dryden, J., Gritton, E. C., Hamilton, T., Hogan, T., Mesic, R., Peetz, D., Raman, R., Steinberg, P., Strong, J., and Trimble, W. (2004). “Wind tunnel and propulsion test facilities,” RAND Corporation TR-134.
Arnold, J. and Wendt, J. F. (1996). “Test facilities,” in Hypersonic Experimental and Computational Capability, Improvement and Validation (Muylaert, J., Kumar, A., and Dujarric, C., eds.), AGARD Advisory Report 319, pp. 174–200.Google Scholar
Chue, R. S. M., Tsia, C.-Y., Bakos, R. J., and Erdos, J. I. (2002). “NASA's HYPULSE facility at GASL – A dual mode, dual driver reflected-shock/expansion tunnel,” in Advanced Hypersonic Test Facilities (Lu, F. K. and Marren, D. E., eds.), Vol. 198 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, pp. 29–71.Google Scholar
Curran, E. T. and Murthy, S. N. B. (eds.). (2000). Scramjet Propulsion, Vol. 189 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA.
Escher, W. J. D. (ed.). (1997). The Synerget Engine: Airbreathing/Rocket Combined-Cycle Propulsion for Tomorrow's Space Transport, Society of Automotive Engineers.Google Scholar
Glassman, I. (1996). Combustion, 3rd ed., Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goyne, C. P., McDanielJr., J. C., Krauss, R. H., and Whitehurst, W. B. (2007). “Test gas vitiation effects in a dual-mode scramjet combustor,” J. Propul. Power 23, 559–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannemann, K. and Beck, W. H. (2002). “Aerothermodynamics research at DLR High Enthalpy Shock Tunnel HEG,” in Advanced Hypersonic Test Facilities (Lu, F. K. and Marren, D. E., eds.), Vol. 198 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, pp. 205–238.Google Scholar
Holden, M. S. and Parker, R. A. (2002) “LENS hypervelocity tunnels and application to vehicle testing at duplicated flight conditions,” in Advanced Hypersonic Test Facilities (Lu, F. K. and Marren, D. E., eds.), Vol. 198 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, pp. 73–110.Google Scholar
Krauss, R. and McDaniel, J. C. (1992). “A clean air continuous flow propulsion facility,” AIAA Paper 92–3912.
Lu, F. K. and Marren, D. E. (eds.). (2002). Advanced Hypersonic Test Facilities, Vol. 198 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA.
Paull, A. and Stalker, R. J. (1998). “Scramjet testing in the T4 impulse facility,” AIAA Paper 98–1533.
Roudakov, A. S., Semenov, V. L., Strokin, M. V., Relin, V. L., Tsyplakov, V. V., and Kondratov, A. A. (2001). “The prospects of hypersonic engines in-flight testing technology development,” AIAA-2001-1807, 10th International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems, Kyoto, Japan.
Sagnier, P. and Vérand, J.-L. (1998). “Flow charaterization in ONERA F4 high-enthalpy wind tunnel,” AIAA J. 36, 522–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. M., Felderman, E. J., and Shope, F. L. (2002). “Arc-heated facilities,” in Advanced Hypersonic Test Facilities (Lu, F. K. and Marren, D. E., eds.), Vol. 198 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, pp. 279–314.Google Scholar
Tomioka, S., Hiraiwa, T., Kobayashi, K., and Izumikawa, M. (2007). “Vitiation effects on scramjet engine performance in Mach 6 flight conditions,” J. Propul. Power 23, 789–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woike, M. R. and Willis, B. P. (2002). “NASA Glenn Research Center's Hypersonic Tunnel Facility,” in Advanced Hypersonic Test Facilities (Lu, F. K. and Marren, D. E., eds.), Vol. 198 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, pp. 427–439.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×