Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:37:34.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Inlets and Nozzles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Corin Segal
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Inlets

Introduction

Air intakes for any air-breathing engine-equipped vehicles must

capture the exact amount of air required by the engine, accomplish the deceleration to the required engine entrance air speed with minimum total pressure loss, deliver the air with tolerable flow distortion and contribute the least possible drag to the system (Mahoney, 1990).

These general requirements for all air-breathing engine inlets would place particular emphasis on some of the stated functions or others, depending on the specific characteristics of the propulsion system used and the vehicle mission. Some of these requirements are of general applicability; minimum pressure losses and least possible drag induction fall into this category. Other inlet characteristics have more or less significant influence, depending on the particular engine used. For example, dynamic distortions induced by an inlet can create serious difficulties for a gas-turbine-engine compressor because they reduce the stall margin, thus limiting the operational range. The extent to which the dynamic distortions affect a scramjet engine operation, on the other hand, is not entirely clear because increased flow unsteadiness could accelerate mixing but may also have a negative effect on momentum losses. This is not the case for the steady-state flow nonuniformities that have been shown to cause significant effects on the scramjet flow field, as they do on other engines.

Design considerations derived from mission requirements lead to specific inlet characteristics.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Scramjet Engine
Processes and Characteristics
, pp. 87 - 126
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvi, F. S. and Settles, G. S. (1992). “Physical model of the swept shock wave/boundary-layer interaction flowfield,” AIAA J. 30, 2252–2258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. Y., McClinton, C. R., and Weidner, J. P. (2000). “Scramjet performance,” in Scramjet Propulsion (Curran, E. T. and Murthy, S. N. B., eds.), Vol. 189 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, pp. 369–446.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. D. (1989). Hypersonic and High Temperature Gas Dynamics, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Andrews, E. H. and Mackley, E. A. (1976). “Analysis of experimental results of the inlet for the NASA Hypersonic Research Engine Aerothermodynamic Integration Model,” NASA TM X-3365.
Andrews, E. H., Russell, J. W., Mackley, E. A., and Simmonds, A. L. (1974). “An inlet analysis for the NASA Hypersonic Research Engine Aerothermodynamic Integration Model,” NASA TM X-3038.
Ault, D. A. and Wie, D. M. (1994). “Experimental and computational results for the external flowfield of a scramjet inlet,” J. Propul. Power 10, 533–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balempin, V. V. (1997). “Combined cycle for SSTO rocket: Definition of key technologies,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, AIAA, pp. 987–994.Google Scholar
Balempin, V. V., Liston, G. L., and Moszée, R. H. (2002). “Combined cycle engines with inlet conditioning,” AIAA Paper 2002–5148.
Bertram, M. H. (1958). “Boundary layer displacement effects in air at Mach numbers 6.8 and 9.6,” NACA TN 4133.
Billig, F. S., Baurle, R. A., Tam, C.-J., and Wornom, S. F. (1999). “Design and analysis of streamline traced hypersonic inlets,” AIAA Paper 99–4974.
Escher, W. J. D. (1997). “Cryogenic hydrogen-induced air liquefaction technologies for combined-cycle propulsion applications,” in The Synerget Engine, SAE Progress in Technology Series, PT-54, Society of Automotive Engineers, pp. 163–174.Google Scholar
Fernandez, R., Trefny, C. J., Thomas, S. C., and Bulman, M. J. (2001). “Parametric data from a wind tunnel test on a rocket-based combined-cycle engine inlet,” NASA TM-2001–107181.
Gaitonde, D. V., Visbal, M. R., Shang, J. S., Zheltovodov, A. A., and Maksimov, A. I. (2001). “Sidewall interaction in an asymmetric simulated scramjet inlet configuration,” J. Propul. Power 17, 579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goonko, Y. P. and Mazhul, I. I. (2002). “Some factors of hypersonic inlet/airplane interactions,” J. Aircr. 39, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfeld, M. A., Starov, A. V., and Vinogradov, V. A. (2001). “Experimental study of scramjet module,” J. Propul. Power 17, 1222–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golubev, A. G. and Yagodkin, V. I. (1979). “Methods of dispersity and liquid spray droplet concentration definition by using of light diffusion integral characteristics,” Science Notes of CIAM, No. 867 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Hansen, C. F. (1976). “Molecular physics of equilibrium gases – A handbook for engineers,” NASA SP-3096.
Hayes, W. D. and Probstein, R. F. (1959). Hypersonic Flow Theory, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heiser, W. H. and Pratt, D. T. (1994). Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion, AIAA Education Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, J. R. and Anderson, G. Y. (1973). “Design considerations for the airframe-integrated scramjet,” NASA TM X-2895.
Holland, S. D. and Perkins, J. N. (1990). “Mach 6 testing of two generic three-dimensional sidewall compression scramjet inlets in tetrafluoromethane,” AIAA Paper 90-0530.
Hsia, Y.-C., Gross, B., and Ortwerth, J. P. (1991). “Inviscid analysis of a dual mode scramjet inlet,” J. Propul. Power 7, 1030–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, R. G. (1968). Physics of Electrical Propulsion, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kantrowitz, A. and Donaldson, C. duP. (1945). “Preliminary investigation of supersonic diffusers,” NACA WR L-713.
Korkegi, R. H. (1975). “Comparison of shock-induced two- and three-dimensional incipient turbulent separation,” AIAA J. 13, 534–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichford, R. J., Bityurin, V. A., and Lineberry, J. T. (2000). “Thermodynamic cycle analysis of magnetohydrodynamic-bypass hypersonic airbreathing engines,” NASA TP-2000–210387.
Livingston, T., Segal, C., Schindler, M., and Vinogradov, V. A. (2000). “Penetration and spreading of liquid jets in an external–internal compression inlet,” AIAA J. 38, 989–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaron, V. S. and Surmanov, V. N. (1997). “Rocket-ramjet engine of air liquefaction cycle (LACRRE): Performance analysis and experimental investigations,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, Vol. 2, AIAA, pp. 1259–1265.Google Scholar
Macheret, S. O., Schneider, M. N., and Miles, R. B. (2004). “Scramjet inlet control by off-body energy addition: A virtual cowl,” J. Propul. Power 42, 2294–2302.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. J. (1990). Inlets for Supersonic Missiles (J. S. Przemieniecki, series editor-in-chief), AIAA Educational Series.Google Scholar
McClinton, C. R. (2002). “Hypersonic technology…Past, present and future,” presented at a seminar at the University of Florida. Available from C. Segal.
Ogorodnikov, D. A., Vinogradov, V. A., Petrov, M. D., Shikhman, Yu. M., and Stepanov, V. A. (1999). “Some results of CIAM scramjet technology,” AIAA Paper 1999–4030.
Ortwerth, P. J. (2000). “Scramjet flowpath integration,” in Scramjet Propulsion (Curran, E. T. and Murthy, S. N. B., eds.), Vol. 189 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, pp. 1105–1293.Google Scholar
Owens, M. G., Mullagiri, S., Segal, C., and Vinogradov, V. A. (2001). “Effects of fuel preinjection on mixing in a Mach 1.6 airflow,” J. Propul. Power 17, 605–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resler, E. L. and Sears, W. R. (1958). “The prospects for magnetoaerodynamics,” J. Aeronaut. Sci. 25, 235–245.Google Scholar
Riggins, D. W. (2004). “Analysis of the magnetohydrodynamic energy bypass engine for high-speed airbreathing propulsion,” J. Propul. Power 20, 779–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schetz, J. A. (1980). “Turbulent flowfield mixing and injection process,” in (Summerfield, Martin, ed.), Vol. 68 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA.Google Scholar
Schneider, M. N., Macheret, S. O., and Miles, R. B. (2004). “Analysis of magnetohydrodynamic control of scramjet inlets,” J. Propul. Power 42, 2303–2310.Google Scholar
Schwaitzentruber, T. E., Sislian, J. R., and Parent, B. (2005). “Suppression of premature ignition in the premixed inlet flow of a shcramjet,” J. Propul. Power 21, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, A. H. (1953). The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow, Wiley, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Shikhman, Yu. M., Vinogradov, V. A., Yanovskiy, L. S., Stepanov, V. A., Shlyakotin, V. E., and Pen'kov, S. N. (2001). “The demonstrator of technologies – Endothermic hydrocarbon fueled dual mode scramjet,” AIAA Paper 2001–1787.
Sislian, J. P. and Dudebout, R. (1993). “Hypersonic shock-induced combustion ramjet performance analysis,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Air-Breathing Engines, AIAA, pp. 413–420.Google Scholar
Sislian, J. P. and Parent, B. (2004). “Hypervelocity fuel/air mixing in a scramjet inlet,” J. Propul. Power 20, 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, M. K. and Trexler, C. A. (2004). “Mach 4 performance of hypersonic inlet with rectangular-to-elliptical shape transition,” J. Propul. Power 20, 228–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takagi, Y., Monji, T., Tomike, J., Tanatsugu, N., Sato, T., and Kobayashi, H. (1997). “Development study of air intake for ATREX engine,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, AIAA, Vol. 1, pp. 204–211.Google Scholar
Vanderkerckhove, J. and Barrère, M. (1993). “Energy management,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, AIAA.Google Scholar
Wie, D. M. (2000). “Scramjet inlets,” in Scramjet Propulsion (Curran, E. T. and Murthy, S. N. B., eds.), Vol. 189 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, pp. 447–511.Google Scholar
Wie, D. M., Kwok, F. T., and Walsh, R. F. (1996). “Starting characteristics of supersonic inlets,” AIAA Paper 1996–2914.
Wie, D. M. and Molder, S. (1992). “Applications of Busemann inlet designs for flight at hypersonic speeds,” AIAA Paper 92–1210.
Vasiliev, V., Zakotenko, S. N., Krasheninnikov, S. Yu., and Stepanov, V. A. (1994). “Numerical investigation of mixing and augmentation behind oblique shock waves,” AIAA J. 32, 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vatazhin, A. B. and Kopchenov, V. I. (2000). “Problem of hypersonic flow deceleration by magnetic field,” in Scramjet Propulsion (Curran, E. T. and Murthy, S. N. B., eds.), Vol. 189 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, pp. 891–938.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, V. (1997). “Review of Russian hydrocarbon fueled scramjet technology,” presented at the workshop on Russian Hypersonic Technologies, APL-JHU.
Vinogradov, V. A. and Prudnikov, A. G. (1993). “Injection of liquid into the strut shadow at supersonic velocities,” SAE-931455, SAE Aerospace Atlantic Conference, Society of Automotive Engineers.
Vinogradov, V. A., Shikhman, Yu. M., and Segal, C. (2007). “A review of fuel pre-injection in supersonic, chemically reacting, flows,” ASME Appl. Mech. Rev. 60, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Inlets and Nozzles
  • Corin Segal, University of Florida
  • Book: The Scramjet Engine
  • Online publication: 19 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627019.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Inlets and Nozzles
  • Corin Segal, University of Florida
  • Book: The Scramjet Engine
  • Online publication: 19 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627019.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Inlets and Nozzles
  • Corin Segal, University of Florida
  • Book: The Scramjet Engine
  • Online publication: 19 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627019.006
Available formats
×