Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T01:40:20.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Protecting an Underwater Rainforest

Freshwater Science in the Southeastern United States

from Part I - Programs and Initiatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2018

By
Anna L. George ,
Joshua R. Ennen  and
Bernard R. Kuhajda
Edited by
Allison B. Kaufman ,
Meredith J. Bashaw  and
Terry L. Maple
Allison B. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Meredith J. Bashaw
Affiliation:
Franklin and Marshall College, Pennsylvania
Terry L. Maple
Affiliation:
Jacksonville Zoo and Gardens
Get access

Summary

The southeastern United States is home to the highest diversity of freshwater animals in North America. Unfortunately, their habitats are facing similar conservation challenges as freshwater ecosystems around the world, and these animals are at grave risk of extinction. The Tennessee Aquarium has established a conservation framework of “discover, act, and share” in order to protect the species in our region. Our first goal is to build knowledge of these understudied freshwater communities. By simulating headwater stream communities in artificial streams, we can build understanding of how a changing environment affects the distribution of specific species and the structure of the overall community. At a larger scale, we compare diversity and imperilment levels of fishes, mussels, and crayfishes in different watersheds to prioritize regional conservation efforts. We act on our scientific knowledge by using our expertise in aquatic husbandry to advance best practices for the reintroduction of imperiled animals. Finally, we use our exhibits and work with the media to craft outreach and communication messages that resonate with our audience.
Type
Chapter
Information
Scientific Foundations of Zoos and Aquariums
Their Role in Conservation and Research
 , pp. 64 - 90
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, R., Allan, J. D., & Lehner, B. (2007). Unlocking the potential of protected areas for freshwaters. Biological Conservation, 134(1), 48–63.Google Scholar
Abell, R., Thieme, M. L., Revenga, C., Bryer, M., Kottelat, M., Bogutskaya, N., … Stiassny, M. L. (2008). Freshwater ecoregions of the world: A new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. BioScience, 58(5), 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, V. M., Setterfield, S. A., Douglas, M. M., Kennard, M. J., & Ferdinands, K. (2015). Measuring benefits of protected area management: Trends across realms and research gaps for freshwater systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 370(1681), 20140274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albon, S. D., Irvine, R. J., Halvorsen, O., Langvatn, R., Loe, L. E., Ropstad, E., … Hansen, B. B. (2017). Contrasting effects of summer and winter warming on body mass explain population dynamics in a food‐limited Arctic herbivore. Global Change Biology, 23(4), 1374–1389.Google Scholar
Brockington, D. (2002). Fortress Conservation: The Preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, C. D., Wooten, J. A., Corbet, C. M., Dulka, E. A., Mitchem, J. A., & Krieger, T. J. (2013) Ecological interactions between two broadly sympatric, cryptic species of dusky salamander (genus Desmognathus). Copeia, 2013(3), 499–506.Google Scholar
Caro, T. M., & O’Doherty, G. (1999). On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 13(4), 805–814.Google Scholar
Caruso, N. M., Sears, M. W., Adams, D. C., & Lips, K. R. (2014). Widespread rapid reductions in body size of adult salamanders in response to climate change. Global Change Biology, 20(6), 1751–1759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cech, J. J., & Doroshov, S. I. (2004). Environmental requirements, preferences, and tolerance limits of North American sturgeons. In LeBreton, G. T. O., Beamish, F. W. H. & McKinley, R. S. (Eds.), Sturgeons and Paddlefish of North America (pp. 73–86). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collen, B., Whitton, F., Dyer, E. E., Baillie, J. E., Cumberlidge, N., Darwall, W. R., … Böhm, M. (2014). Global patterns of freshwater species diversity, threat and endemism. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23(1), 40–51.Google Scholar
Cook, C. N., Mascia, M. B., Schwartz, M. W., Possingham, H. P., & Fuller, R. A. (2013). Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge–action boundary. Conservation Biology, 27(4), 669–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courtenay, W. R. Jr, Hensley, D. A., Taylor, J. N., & McCann, J. A. (1984). Distribution of exotic fishes in the continental United States. In Courtenay, W. R. & Stauffer, J. R. (Eds.), Distribution, Biology, and Management of Exotic Fishes (pp. 41–77). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cvitanovic, C., Fulton, C. J., Wilson, S. K., van Kerkhoff, L., Cripps, I. L., & Muthiga, N. (2014). Utility of primary scientific literature to environmental managers: An international case study on coral-dominated marine protected areas. Ocean & Coastal Management, 102(A), 72–78.Google Scholar
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z. I., Knowler, D. J., Lévêque, C., … Sullivan, C. A. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews, 81(2), 163–182.Google Scholar
Elkins, D. C., Sweat, S. C., Hill, K. S., Kuhajda, B. R., George, A. L., & Wenger, S. J. (2016). The Southeastern Aquatic Biodiversity Conservation Strategy. Final Report. Athens, GA: University of Georgia River Basin Center.Google Scholar
Falk, J. H., Reinhard, E. M., Vernon, C., Bronnenkant, K., Heimlich, J. E., & Deans, N. L. (2007). Why Zoos & Aquariums Matter: Assessing the Impact of a Visit to a Zoo or Aquarium. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos & Aquariums.Google Scholar
George, A. L., Kuhajda, B. R., Williams, J. D., Cantrell, M. A., Rakes, P. L., & Shute, J. R. (2009). Guidelines for propagation and translocation for freshwater fish conservation. Fisheries, 34(11), 529–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, A. L., Hamilton, M. T., & Alford, K. F. (2013). We all live downstream: Engaging partners and visitors in freshwater fish reintroduction programmes. International Zoo Yearbook, 47(1), 140–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, A. L., Kuhajda, B. R., Neely, D. A., & Call, G. (2015). Laurel Dace Recovery Plan Draft Report. Atlanta, GA: Southeast Region, US Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Gusset, M., & Dick, G. (2011). The global reach of zoos and aquariums in visitor numbers and conservation expenditures. Zoo Biology, 30(5), 566–569.Google Scholar
Hairston, N. G. (1987). Community Ecology and Salamander Guilds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heimlich, J. E., Searles, V.C., & Atkins, A. (2013). Zoos and aquariums and their role in education for sustainability in schools. In McKeown, R. & Nolet, V. (Eds.), Schooling for Sustainable Development in Canada and the United States (pp. 199–210). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Hermoso, V., Linke, S., Prenda, J., & Possingham, H. P. (2011). Addressing longitudinal connectivity in the systematic conservation planning of fresh waters. Freshwater Biology, 56(1), 57–70.Google Scholar
Jelks, H. L., Walsh, S. J., Burkhead, N. M., Contreras-Balderas, S., Diaz-Pardo, E., Hendrickson, D. A., … Platania, S. P. (2008). Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries, 33(8), 372–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, C. N., Van Houtan, K. S., Pimm, S. L., & Sexton, J. O. (2015). US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(16), 5081–5086.Google Scholar
Knight, A. T., Cowling, R. M., Rouget, M., Balmford, A., Lombard, A. T., & Campbell, B. M. (2008). Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research–implementation gap. Conservation Biology, 22(3), 610–617.Google Scholar
Liles, L. A., Cecala, K. K., Ennen, J. R., & Davenport, J. M. (2017). Elevated temperatures alter body condition and competitive outcomes in Appalachian salamanders. Animal Conservation, 20(6), 502–510.Google Scholar
Master, L. (1990). The imperiled status of North American aquatic animals. Biodiversity Network News, 3(3), 1–2.Google Scholar
McLeod, C., Hildebrand, L., & Radford, D. (1999). A synopsis of lake sturgeon management in Alberta, Canada. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 15(4–5), 173–179.Google Scholar
McShane, T. O., Hirsch, P. D., Trung, T. C., Songorwa, A. N., Kinzig, A., Monteferri, B., … Welch-Devine, M. (2011). Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation, 144(3), 966–972.Google Scholar
Moore, M. J., DiStefano, R. J., & Larson, E. R. (2013). An assessment of life-history studies for USA and Canadian crayfishes: Identifying biases and knowledge gaps to improve conservation and management. Freshwater Science, 32(4), 1276–1287.Google Scholar
Muir, M. J., & Schwartz, M. W. (2009). Academic research training for a nonacademic workplace: A case study of graduate student alumni who work in conservation. Conservation Biology, 23(6), 1357–1368.Google Scholar
Murphy, B. R., & Willis, D. W. (Eds.) (1996). Fisheries Techniques (2nd ed.). Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.Google Scholar
Nico, L. G., & Fuller, P. L. (1999). Spatial and temporal patterns of nonindigenous fish introductions in the United States. Fisheries, 24(1), 16–27.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlberger, J. (2013). Climate warming and ecototherm body size: From individual physiology to community ecology. Functional Ecology, 27(4), 991–1001.Google Scholar
Osmond, D. L., Nadkarni, N. M., Driscoll, C. T., Andrews, E., Gold, A. J., Allred, S. R. B., … Schwarz, K. (2010). The role of interface organizations in science communication and understanding. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(6), 306–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, P. G., Matthews, C. E., Ayers, D. F., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Conservation and education: Prominent themes in zoo mission statements. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3), 53–60.Google Scholar
Pittock, J., Hansen, L. J., & Abell, R. (2008). Running dry: Freshwater biodiversity, protected areas and climate change. Biodiversity, 9(3–4), 30–38.Google Scholar
Pringle, C. M. (2001). Hydrologic connectivity and the management of biological reserves: A global perspective. Ecological Applications, 11(4), 981–998.Google Scholar
Pritchard, P. C. H. (1989). The Alligator Snapping Turtle: Biology and Conservation. Milwaukee, WI: Milwaukee Public Museum.Google Scholar
Ream, J. T. (2008). Survival, Movement, and Habitat Selection of Introduced Juvenile Alligator Snapping Turtles (Macrochelys temminckii) in the Wolf River Drainage, Fayette County, Tennessee. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN.Google Scholar
Reed, R. N., Congdon, J., & Gibbons, J. W. (2002). The Alligator Snapping Turtle [Macrochelys (Macroclemys) temminckii]: A Review of Ecology, Life History, and Conservation, with Demographic Analyses of the Sustainability of Take from Wild Populations. Washington, DC: United States Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, A., & Rasmussen, J. B. (1999). Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology, 13(5), 1220–1222.Google Scholar
Richter, B. D., Braun, D. P., Mendelson, M. A., & Master, L. L. (1997). Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology, 11(5), 1081–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, D. L., Meeuwig, J. J., & Vincent, A. C. J. (2002). Freshwater protected areas: Strategies for conservation. Conservation Biology, 16(1), 30–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seddon, P. J., Armstrong, D. P., & Maloney, R. F. (2007). Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conservation Biology, 21(2), 303–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shute, J. R., Rakes, P. L., & Shute, P. W. (2005). Reintroduction of four imperiled fishes in Abrams Creek, Tennessee. Southeastern Naturalist, 4(1), 93–110.Google Scholar
Silk, N., & Ciruna, K. (Eds.) (2013). A Practitioner’s Guide to Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Skelton, C. E. (2001). New dace of the genus Phoxinus (Cyprinidae: Cypriniformes) from the Tennessee River drainage, Tennessee. Copeia, 2001(1), 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southeastern Lake Sturgeon Working Group (SLSWG) (2013). Lake Sturgeon Management Plan for the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers. Warm Springs, GA: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., & Dudgeon, D. (2010). Freshwater biodiversity conservation: Recent progress and future challenges. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 29(1), 344–358.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W. J., Adams, W. M., Aronson, R. B., Aveling, R., Blackburn, T. M., Broad, S., … Dinerstein, E. (2009). One hundred questions of importance to the conservation of global biological diversity. Conservation Biology, 23(3), 557–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. A., Schuster, G. A., Cooper, J. E., DiStefano, R. J., Eversole, A. G., Hamr, P., … Thoma, R. F. (2007). A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada after 10+ years of increased awareness. Fisheries, 32(8), 372–389.Google Scholar
Tennessee State Wildlife Action Plan Team (TSWAPT) (2015). Tennessee State Wildlife Action Plan. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency.Google Scholar
Terando, A. J., Costanza, J., Belyea, C., Dunn, R. R., McKerrow, A., & Collazo, J. A. (2014). The southern megalopolis: Using the past to predict the future of urban sprawl in the southeast US. PLoS One, 9(7), e102261.Google Scholar
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2005). Inclusion of alligator snapping turtle (Macroclemys [=Macrochelys] temminckii) and all species of map turtles (Graptemys spp.) in Appendix III to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Federal Register, 70(241), 74700–74712.Google Scholar
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2015). Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: 90-day finding on 31 petitions. Federal Register, 80(126), 37568–37579.Google Scholar
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2018). Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; endangered species status for Barrens topminnow. Federal Register, 83(3), 490–498.Google Scholar
Ward, J. V., Tockner, K., Arscott, D. B., & Claret, C. (2002) Riverine landscape diversity. Freshwater Biology, 47(4), 517–539.Google Scholar
Warren, M. L. Jr., Burr, B. M., Walsh, S. J., Bart, H. L. Jr., Cashner, R. C., Etnier, D. A., … Ross, S. T. (2000). Diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States. Fisheries, 25(10), 7–31.Google Scholar
Wells, M., & Bradon, K. (1992). People and Parks: Linking Protected Area Management with Local Communities. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Whitten, T., Holmes, D., & MacKinnon, K. (2001). Conservation biology: A displacement behavior for academia? Conservation Biology, 15(1), 1–3.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×