BirdLife International (2016). Anodorhynchus leari. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22685521A93077801. Retrieved from www.iucnredlist.org/details/22685521/0.Google Scholar

Bottoni, L., Massa, R., Lea, R. W., & Sharp, P. J. (1993). Mate choice and reproductive success in the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa). Hormones and Behavior, 27, 308–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bressan, P. M. & Gonçalves, M. L. (2014). Fundação Parque Zoológico de São Paulo. São Paulo: Relatório Anual.Google Scholar

BRASIL (2006). Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA). Plano de Manejo da Arara-Azul-de-Lear (Anodorhynchus leari). Coordenação de Espécies da Fauna. Brasília: IBAMA.Google Scholar

BRASIL (2013). Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Portaria no. 231, de 26 de Setembro de 2013. Aprova o Programa de Cativeiro da Arara azul-de-lear, espécie ameaçada de extinção, estabelecendo seu objetivo, objetivos específicos, ações estratégicas para a conservação ex situ da espécie. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, de 30 de Setembro de 2013. Seção, 1.Google Scholar

BRASIL (2014). Portaria MMA no. 444 de 17 de Dezembro de 2014. Diário Oficial da União, Poder Executivo, Brasília, DF, 18 Dez 2014. Seção, 1.Google Scholar

Comunicação ICMBio (2017). Centro registra 1350 araras-azuis-de-lear na natureza. Últimas notícias. Brasília. Retreived from www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/ultimas-noticias/20-geral/9221-centro-registra-1-350-araras-azuis-de-lear-na-natureza.Google Scholar

Cornejo, J. (2018). Lear’s Macaw (Anodorhynchus leari) International Studbook and Population Analysis. Captive Program for the Lear´s Macaw. Singapore: ICMBio.Google Scholar

Favoretto, G. R. (2016). Comportamento reprodutivo Arara-Azul-de-Lear (Anodorhynchus leari, Bonaparte, 1856) em cativeiro e a influência da técnica do flocking na interação de pares. São Paulo: Dissertação (Mestrado em Conservação da Fauna) Universidade Federal de São Carlos/Fundação Parque Zoológico de São Paulo.Google Scholar

Flammer, K., & Clubb, S. L. (1994). Neonatology. In: Ritchie, B. W., Harrison, G. J., & Harrison, L. R. (Eds.), Avian Medicine: Principles and Application (pp. 805–838). Lake Worth, FL: Winger Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar

Francisco, R. M. & Silveira, L. F. (2013). Conservação animal ex situ. In: Piratelli, A. J. & Francisco, M. R. (Eds.), Conservação da Biodiversidade: Dos Conceitos às Ações, 1st edn. (pp. 117–130). Rio de Janeiro: Technical Books.Google Scholar

Gaudioso, V. R., Alonso, M. E., Robles, R., Garrido, J. A., Olmedo, J. A. (2002). Effects of housing type and breeding system on the reproductive capacity of the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa). Poultry Science, 81, 169–172.Google Scholar

Guedes, N. M. R. (2009). Arara-azul-de-lear. Site do Projeto Arara Azul. Instituto Arara Azul. Retrieved from www.projetoararaazul.org.br.Google Scholar

Guida, F. J. V. & Paiva, R. V. (2015). Reprodução em cativeiro de arara-azul-de-lear. Presented at III Simpósio Brasileiro de Biologia da Conservação, FPZSP, São Paulo.Google Scholar

Guida, F. J. V., Paiva, R. V., & Pacífico de Assis, E. C. (2017). Desenvolvimento ontogenético de filhotes de arara-azul-de-lear, Anodorhynchue leari, criados artificialmente: Uma comparação com dados obtidos in situ. Presented at I Reunião Científica da FPZSP, São Paulo.Google Scholar

Ihle, M., Kempenaers, B., & Forstmeier, W. (2015). Fitness benefits of mate choice for compatibility in a socially monogamous species. PLoS Biology, 13, e1002248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lugarini, C, Barbosa, A. E. A., de Oliveira, K. G. (2012). Plano de Ação Nacional para a Conservação da Arara-azul-de-Lear. 2nd edn. Brasília: ICMBio – Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade.Google Scholar

Mellen, J. D. (1994). Survey and interzoo studies used to address husbandry problems in some zoo vertebrates. Zoo Biology, 13, 459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pacífico de Assis, E. C. (2011). Biologia reprodutiva da arara-azul-de-lear Anodorhynchus leari (Aves: Psittacidae) na Estação Biológica de Canudos, BA. São Paulo: Dissertação (Mestrado em Zoologia) – Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar

Scott, D. K. (1980). Functional aspects of the pair bond in winter in Bewick’s swans (Cygnus columbianus bewickii). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 7, 323–327.Google Scholar

Sick, H. (1979). Anodorhynchus leari, descoberta. Alauda, 47, 59–60.Google Scholar

Watson, R. (2007). Captive husbandry management of the Lear’s Macaw (Anodorhynchus leari) at Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation. Presented at: 33rd Annual Convention of the American Federation of Aviculture (AFA), Los Angeles.Google Scholar

West-Eberhard, M. J. (1979). Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 123, 222–234.Google Scholar

Balsam, P., Sanchez-Castillo, H., Taylor, K., Van Volkinburg, H., & Ward, R. D. (2009). Timing and anticipation: conceptual and methodological approaches. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(9), 1749–1755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bassett, L., & Buchanan-Smith, H. M. (2007). Effects of predictability on the welfare of captive animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102(3–4), 223–245.Google Scholar

Bateson, M., & Matheson, S. M. (2007). Performance on a categorisation task suggests that removal of environmental enrichment induces “pessimism” in captive European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Animal Welfare, 16(2), 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bethell, E. J. (2015). A “how-to” guide for designing judgment bias studies to assess captive animal welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 18, S18–S42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloomfield, R. C., Gillespie, G. R., Kerswell, K. J., Butler, K. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2015). Effect of partial covering of the visitor viewing area window on positioning and orientation of zoo orangutans: A preference test. Zoo Biology, 34(3), 223–229.Google Scholar

Bloomsmith, M. A., & Lambeth, S. P. (1995). Effects of predictable versus unpredictable feeding schedules on chimpanzee behavior. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 44(1), 65–74.Google Scholar

Boissy, A., & Erhard, H. W. (2014). How Studying Interactions between Animal Emotions, Cognition, and Personality Can Contribute to Improve Farm Animal Welfare. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar

Boissy, A., & Lee, C. (2014). How assessing relationships between emotions and cognition can improve farm animal welfare. Revue Scientifique et Technique – Office International Des Epizooties, 33(1), 103–110.Google Scholar

Brenes, J. C., & Schwarting, R. K. W. (2015). Individual differences in anticipatory activity to food rewards predict cue-induced appetitive 50-kHz calls in rats. Physiology & Behavior, 149, 107–118.Google Scholar

Carlstead, K., Mellen, J., & Kleiman, D. G. (1999). Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) in U.S. zoos: I. Individual behavior profiles and their relationship to breeding success. Zoo Biology, 18(1), 17–34.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlstead, K., & Shepherdson, D. (2000). Alleviating stress in zoo animals with environmental enrichment. In Mench, G. P. M. J. A. (Ed.), The Biology of Animal Stress: Basic Principles and Implications for Animal Welfare (pp. 337–349). New York, NY: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar

Chamove, A. S. (1989). Environmental enrichment: A review. Animal Technology: Journal of the Institute of Animal Technology, 40(3), 155–178.Google Scholar

Chelluri, G. I., Ross, S. R., & Wagner, K. E. (2013). Behavioral correlates and welfare implications of informal interactions between caretakers and zoo-housed chimpanzees and gorillas. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 147(3–4), 306–315.Google Scholar

Chittka, L., & Jensen, K. (2011). Animal cognition: Concepts from apes to bees. Current Biology, 21(3), R116–R119.Google Scholar

Chitty, J. (2003). Feather plucking in psittacine birds 2. Social, environmental and behavioural considerations. In Practice, 25(9), 550.Google Scholar

Clark, F. E. (2011). Great ape cognition and captive care: Can cognitive challenges enhance well-being? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 135(1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Clark, F. E. (2013). Marine mammal cognition and captive care: A proposal for cognitive enrichment in zoos and aquariums. Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research, 1(1), 1–6.Google Scholar

Clegg, I., & Delfour, F. (2018). Cognitive judgement bias is associated with frequency of anticipatory behavior in bottlenose dolphins. Zoo Biology, 37(2), 67–73.Google Scholar

Cunningham, C. L., Gremel, C. M., & Groblewski, P. A. (2006). Drug-induced conditioned place preference and aversion in mice. Nature Protocols, 1(4), 1662–1670.Google Scholar

Davidson, A. J., Tataroglu, O., & Menaker, M. (2005). Circadian effects of timed meals (and other rewards). In Young, M. W. (Ed.), Circadian Rhythms (Vol. 393, pp. 509–523). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar

Dudink, S., Simonse, H., Marks, I., de Jonge, F. H., & Spruijt, B. M. (2006). Announcing the arrival of enrichment increases play behaviour and reduces weaning-stress-induced behaviours of piglets directly after weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 101(1–2), 86–101.Google Scholar

Escobar, C., Martinez-Merlos, M. T., Angeles-Castellanos, M., Minana, M. D., & Buijs, R. M. (2007). Unpredictable feeding schedules unmask a system for daily resetting of behavioural and metabolic food entrainment. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26(10), 2804–2814.Google Scholar

Fanselow, M. S. (1980). Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science: Official Journal of the Pavlovian, 15(4), 177–182.Google Scholar

Franks, B., Champagne, F. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2013). How enrichment affects exploration trade-offs in rats: Implications for welfare and well-being. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e83578.Google Scholar

Garner, J. P., Meehan, C. L., Famula, T. R., & Mench, J. A. (2006). Genetic, environmental, and neighbor effects on the severity of stereotypies and feather picking in orange-winged Amazon parrots (Amazona amazonica): An epidemiological study. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 96(1), 153–168.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, D. H., Coleman, K., & McCowan, B. (2013). The effects of predictability in daily husbandry routines on captive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 143(2–4), 117–127.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, D. H., Ghirardo, S., Minier, D. E., Sharpe, N., Tatum, L., & McCowan, B. (2011). Efficacy of 3 types of foraging enrichment for rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 50(6), 888–894.Google Scholar

Grindlinger, H. M. (1991). Compulsive feather picking in birds. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48(9), 857–857.Google Scholar

Gunn, D., & Morton, D. B. (1995). Inventory of the behaviour of New Zealand white rabbits in laboratory cages. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 45(3), 277–292.Google Scholar

Hall, L. E., Robinson, S., & Buchanan-Smith, H. M. (2015). Refining dosing by oral gavage in the dog: A protocol to harmonise welfare. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 72, 35–46.Google Scholar

Harding, E. J., Paul, E. S., & Mendl, M. (2004). Animal behaviour: Cognitive bias and affective state. Nature, 427(6972), 312–312.Google Scholar

Harley, H. E., Fellner, W., & Stamper, M. A. (2010). Cognitive research with dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) at Disney’s The Seas: A program for enrichment, science, education, and conservation. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23(3), 331–343.Google Scholar

Herbert, P. L., & Bard, K. (2000). Orangutan use of vertical space in an innovative habitat. Zoo Biology, 19(4), 239–251.Google Scholar

Herrelko, E. S., Buchanan-Smith, H. M., & Vick, S.-J. (2015). Perception of available space during chimpanzee introductions: Number of accessible areas is more important than enclosure size. Zoo Biology, 34(5), 397–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hill, J. O., Pavlik, E. J., Smith, G. L., Burghardt, G. M., & Coulson, P. B. (1976). Species-characteristic responses to catnip by undomesticated felids. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2(2), 239–253.Google Scholar

Hughes, B. O., & Duncan, I. J. H. (1988). The notion of ethological “need,” models of motivation and animal welfare. Animal Behaviour, 36(6), 1696–1707.Google Scholar

Imfeld-Mueller, S., & Hillmann, E. (2012). Anticipation of a food ball increases short-term activity levels in growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 137(1–2), 23–29.Google Scholar

Inglis, I. R., Langton, S., Forkman, B., & Lazarus, J. (2001). An information primacy model of exploratory and foraging behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 62(3), 543–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, A. L. M., Delfour, F., & Carter, T. (2013). Anticipatory behavior in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): A preliminary study. Zoo Biology, 32(4), 436–444.Google Scholar

Kirkwood, J. K., & Hubrecht, R. (2001). Animal consciousness, cognition and welfare. Animal Welfare, 10(1), 5–17.Google Scholar

Krebs, B. L., & Watters, J. V. (2016). Using technology driven environments to promote animal well-being in zoos. Paper presented at the Human Computer Interactions, San Jose, CA.Google Scholar

Krebs, B. L., & Watters, J. V. (2017). Simple but temporally unpredictable puzzles are cognitive enrichment. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 4(1), 119–134.Google Scholar

Krebs, B. L., Torres, E., Chesney, C., Kantoniemi Moon, V., & Watters, J. V. (2017). Applying behavioral conditioning to identify anticipatory behaviors. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 20(2), 155–175.Google Scholar

Kuczaj, S., Lacinak, T., Fad, O., Trone, M., Solangi, M., & Ramos, J. (2002). Keeping environmental enrichment enriching. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 15(2), 127–137.Google Scholar

Laule, G. E. (2003). Positive reinforcement training and environmental enrichment: Enhancing animal well-being. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 223(7), 969–973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

MacDonald, S. E., & Ritvo, S. (2016). Comparative cognition outside the laboratory. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 11, 49–61.Google Scholar

Makowska, I. J., & Weary, D. M. (2016). Differences in anticipatory behaviour between rats (Rattus norvegicus) housed in standard versus semi-naturalistic laboratory environments. PLoS ONE, 11, e0147595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Manteuffel, G., Langbein, J., & Puppe, B. (2009a). From operant learning to cognitive enrichment in farm animal housing: bases and applicability. Animal Welfare, 18(1), 87–95.Google Scholar

Manteuffel, G., Langbein, J., & Puppe, B. (2009b). Increasing farm animal welfare by positively motivated instrumental behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 118(3–4), 191–198.Google Scholar

Mason, G. J. (1991). Stereotypies: A critical review. Animal Behaviour, 41(6), 1015–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meehan, C. L., & Mench, J. A. (2007). The challenge of challenge: Can problem solving opportunities enhance animal welfare? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102(3–4), 246–261.Google Scholar

Meehan, C. L., Millam, J. R., & Mench, J. A. (2003). Foraging opportunity and increased physical complexity both prevent and reduce psychogenic feather picking by young Amazon parrots. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 80(1), 71–85.Google Scholar

Mellor, D. J., Hunt, S., & Gusset, M. (Eds.) (2015). Caring for Wildlife: The World Zoo and Aquarium Animal Welfare Strategy. Gland: WAZA Executive Office.Google Scholar

Mench, J. A. (1998). Environmental enrichment and the importance of exploratory behavior. In Shepherdson, D. J., Mellen, J. D., & Hutchins, M. (Eds.), Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals (pp. 30–46). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Mendl, M., Burman, O. H. P., Parker, R. M. A., & Paul, E. S. (2009). Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 118(3), 161–181.Google Scholar

Mistlberger, R. E. (1994). Circadian food-anticipatory activity: Formal models and physiological mechanisms. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 18(2), 171–195.Google Scholar

Mistlberger, R. E. (2009). Food-anticipatory circadian rhythms: Concepts and methods. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(9), 1718–1729.Google Scholar

Morimura, N. (2006). Cognitive enrichment in chimpanzees: An approach of welfare entailing an animal’s entire resources. In Matsuzawa, T., Tomonaga, M., & Tanaka, M. (Eds.), Cognitive Development in Chimpanzees (pp. 368–391). Tokyo: Springer Tokyo.Google Scholar

Newberry, R. C. (1995). Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 44(2), 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Novak, M. A., Kinsey, J. H., Jorgensen, M. J., & Hazen, T. J. (1998). Effects of puzzle feeders on pathological behavior in individually housed rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 46(3), 213–227.Google Scholar

Owen, M. A., Swaisgood, R. R., Czekala, N. M., & Lindburg, D. G. (2005). Enclosure choice and well-being in giant pandas: Is it all about control? Zoo Biology, 24(5), 475–481.Google Scholar

Panksepp, J. (2005). Affective consciousness: Core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(1), 30–80.Google Scholar

Poole, T. B. (1987). Social behavior of a group of orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) on an artificial island in Singapore Zoological Gardens. Zoo Biology, 6(4), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Puppe, B., Ernst, K., Schön, P. C., & Manteuffel, G. (2007). Cognitive enrichment affects behavioural reactivity in domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 105(1–3), 75–86.Google Scholar

Renner, M. J., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1986). Object interactions in juvenile rats (Rattus norvegicus): Effects of different experiential histories. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 100(3), 229–236.Google Scholar

Richter, S. H., Schick, A., Hoyer, C., Lankisch, K., Gass, P., & Vollmayr, B. (2012). A glass full of optimism: Enrichment effects on cognitive bias in a rat model of depression. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12(3), 527–542.Google Scholar

Rimpley, K., & Buchanan-Smith, H. M. (2013). Reliably signalling a startling husbandry event improves welfare of zoo-housed capuchins (Sapajus apella). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 147(1–2), 205–213.Google Scholar

Ross, S. R. (2006). Issues of choice and control in the behaviour of a pair of captive polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Behavioural Processes, 73(1), 117–120.Google Scholar

Rushen, J. (1996). Using aversion learning techniques to assess the mental state, suffering, and welfare of farm animals. Journal of Animal Science, 74(8), 1990–1995.Google Scholar

Sambrook, T. D., & Buchanan-Smith, H. M. (1997). Control and complexity in novel object enrichment. Animal Welfare, 6(3), 207–216.Google Scholar

Shepherdson, D. (1994). The role of environmental enrichment in the captive breeding and reintroduction of endangered species. In Olney, P. J. S., Mace, G. M., & Feistner, A. T. C. (Eds.), Creative Conservation: Interactive management of wild and captive animals (pp. 167–177). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar

Shepherdson, D., Lewis, K. D., Carlstead, K., Bauman, J., & Perrin, N. (2013). Individual and environmental factors associated with stereotypic behavior and fecal glucocorticoid metabolite levels in zoo housed polar bears. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 147(3), 268–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solis-Salazar, T., Martinez-Merlos, M. T., Angeles-Castellanos, M., Mendoza, J., & Escobar, C. (2005). Behavioral and physiological adaptations in rats during food-entrainment. Biological Rhythm Research, 36(1–2), 99–108.Google Scholar

Spruijt, B. M., van den Bos, R., & Pijlman, F. T. A. (2001). A concept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: Anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 72(2), 145–171.Google Scholar

Stephan, F. K. (2002). The “other” circadian system: Food as a zeitgeber. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 17(4), 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swaisgood, R. R., & Shepherdson, D. J. (2005). Scientific approaches to enrichment and stereotypies in zoo animals: what’s been done and where should we go next? Zoo Biology, 24(6), 499–518.Google Scholar

Tarou, L. R., & Bashaw, M. J. (2007). Maximizing the effectiveness of environmental enrichment: Suggestions from the experimental analysis of behavior. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102(3–4), 189–204.Google Scholar

Troisi, A. (2002). Displacement activities as a behavioral measure of stress in nonhuman primates and human subjects. Stress, 5(1), 47–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Valuska, A. J., Leighty, K. A., Schutz, P. J., Ferrie, G. M., Sky, C. C., & Bettinger, T. L. (2013). The use of visual barriers to reduce aggression among a group of marabou storks (Leptoptilos crumeniferus). Zoo Biology, 32(6), 648–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

van den Bos, R., Meijer, M. K., van Renselaar, J. P., van der Harst, J. E., & Spruijt, B. M. (2003). Anticipation is differently expressed in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) in the same Pavlovian conditioning paradigm. Behavioural Brain Research, 141(1), 83–89.Google Scholar

van der Harst, J. E., Fermont, P. C. J., Bilstra, A. E., & Spruijt, B. M. (2003). Access to enriched housing is rewarding to rats as reflected by their anticipatory behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 66, 493–504.Google Scholar

van der Kolk, B. A. (1988). The trauma spectrum: The interaction of biological and social events in the genesis of the trauma response. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1(3), 273–290.Google Scholar

van der Kolk, B. A., & Saporta, J. (1991). The biological response to psychic trauma: Mechanisms and treatment of intrusion and numbing. Anxiety Research, 4(3), 199–212.Google Scholar

Watters, J. V. (2009). Toward a predictive theory for environmental enrichment. Zoo Biology, 28(6), 608–622.Google Scholar

Watters, J. V. (2014). Searching for behavioral indicators of welfare in zoos: Uncovering anticipatory behavior. Zoo Biology, 33(4), 251–256.Google Scholar

Watters, J. V., Margulis, S. W., & Atsalis, S. (2009). Behavioral monitoring in zoos and aquariums: A tool for guiding husbandry and directing research. Zoo Biology, 28(1), 35–48.Google Scholar

Watters, J. V., Miller, J. T., & Sullivan, T. J. (2011). Note on optimizing environmental enrichment: A study of fennec fox and zoo guests. Zoo Biology, 30(6), 647–654.Google Scholar

Watters, J. V., & Powell, D. M. (2011). Measuring animal personality for use in population management in zoos: Suggested methods and rationale. Zoo Biology, 31(1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Watters, J. V., et al. (2015). Assessing quality of life in geriatric zoo animals. WAZA Magazine, 16, 37–40.Google Scholar

Weiss, S. J. (2007). Neurobiological alterations associated with traumatic stress. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 43(3), 114–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wells, D. L. (2009). Sensory stimulation as environmental enrichment for captive animals: A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 118(1–2), 1–11.Google Scholar

Whitham, J. C., & Wielebnowski, N. (2013). New directions for zoo animal welfare science. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 147(3–4), 247–260.Google Scholar

Wichman, A., Keeling, L. J., & Forkman, B. (2012). Cognitive bias and anticipatory behaviour of laying hens housed in basic and enriched pens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 140(1–2), 62–69.Google Scholar

Wojciechowski, S. (2004). Introducing a fourth primate species to an established mixed-species exhibit of African monkeys. Zoo Biology, 23(2), 95–108.Google Scholar

Yeates, J. W., & Main, D. C. (2008). Assessment of positive welfare: A review. The Veterinary Journal, 175(3), 293–300.Google Scholar

Zebunke, M., Puppe, B., & Langbein, J. (2013). Effects of cognitive enrichment on behavioural and physiological reactions of pigs. Physiology & Behavior, 118, 70–79.Google Scholar

Allard, S. M., Fuller, G., & Hamilton, J. (2016). The roles of time and space in captive animal welfare. In: Weaver, J. (Ed.), Animal Welfare: Assessments, Challenges and Improvement Strategies (pp. 1–54). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar

Anderson, U. S., Benne, M., Bloomsmith, M. A., & Maple, T. L. (2002). Retreat space and human visitor density moderate undesirable behavior in petting zoo animals. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 5(2), 125–137.Google Scholar

Ashokan, A., Sivasubramanian, M., & Mitra, R. (2016). Seeding stress resilience through inoculation. Neural Plasticity, 2016, 492808.Google Scholar

Baird, B. A., Kuhar, C. W., Lukas, K. E., Amendolagine, L. A., Fuller, G. A., Nemet, J., … Schook, M. W. (2016). Program animal welfare: Using behavioral and physiological measures to assess the well-being of animals used for education programs in zoos. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 176, 150–162.Google Scholar

Bashaw, M. J. (in press). Creating a giraffic park: Design and management ideas for optimal giraffe wellness. In: Segura, V. D., Forthman, D. L., & Maple, T. L. (Eds.), Wellness for Elephants. Fernandina Beach, FL: Red Leaf Press.Google Scholar

Bashaw, M. J., Bloomsmith, M. A., Maple, T. L., & Bercovitch, F. B. (2007). The structure of social relationships among captive female giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121(1), 46–53.Google Scholar

Bassett, L., & Buchanan-Smith, H. M. (2007). Effects of predictability on the welfare of captive animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102(3), 223–245.Google Scholar

Bateson, M. (2004). Mechanisms of decision-making and the interpretation of choice tests. Animal Welfare, 13, S115–S120.Google Scholar

Behringer, V., Stevens, J. M., Hohmann, G., Möstl, E., Selzer, D., & Deschner, T. (2014). Testing the effect of medical positive reinforcement training on salivary cortisol levels in bonobos and orangutans. PLoS ONE, 9, e108664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bloomfield, R. C., Gillespie, G. R., Kerswell, K. J., Butler, K. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2015). Effect of partial covering of the visitor viewing area window on positioning and orientation of zoo orangutans: A preference test. Zoo Biology, 34(3), 223–229.Google Scholar

Bloomsmith, M. A., Laule, G. E., Alford, P. L., & Thurston, R. H. (1994). Using training to moderate chimpanzee aggression during feeding. Zoo Biology, 13(6), 557–566.Google Scholar

Buchanan-Smith, H. M., & Badihi, I. (2012). The psychology of control: Effects of control over supplementary light on welfare of marmosets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 137(3), 166–174.Google Scholar

Clark, F. E. (2011). Space to choose: Network analysis of social preferences in a captive chimpanzee community, and implications for management. American Journal of Primatology, 73(8), 748–757.Google Scholar

Clark, F. E., Davies, S. L., Madigan, A. W., Warner, A. J., & Kuczaj, S. A. (2013). Cognitive enrichment for bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): Evaluation of a novel underwater maze device. Zoo Biology, 32(6), 608–619.Google Scholar

Clark, F. E., & Smith, L. J. (2013). Effect of a cognitive challenge device containing food and non-food rewards on chimpanzee well-being. American Journal of Primatology, 75(8), 807–816.Google Scholar

Clay, A. W., Bloomsmith, M. A., Marr, M. J., & Maple, T. L. (2009). Systematic investigation of the stability of food preferences in captive orangutans: Implications for positive reinforcement training. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 12(4), 306–313.Google Scholar

Clay, A. W., Perdue, B. M., Gaalema, D. E., Dolins, F. L., & Bloomsmith, M. A. (2011). The use of technology to enhance zoological parks. Zoo Biology, 30(5), 487–497.Google Scholar

Clayton, J. B., & Glander, K. E. (2011). Dietary choices by four captive slender lorises (Loris tardigradus) when presented with various insect life stages. Zoo biology, 30(2), 189–198.Google Scholar

Coe, J. (2006). Naturalistic enrichment. Proceedings of the Australasian Regional Association of Zoological Parks and Aquaria Conference. Retrieved from www.zoolex.org/publication/coe/NaturalisticEnrichment2006.pdf.Google Scholar

Coe, J. C., & Mendez, R. (2005). The unzoo alternative. Proceedings of the Australasian Regional Association of Zoological Parks and Aquaria Conference. Retrieved from www.zoolex.org/publication/coe/Unzoo150805.pdf.Google Scholar

Coe, J. C., Scott, D., & Lukas, K. E. (2009). Facility design for bachelor gorilla groups. Zoo Biology, 28(2), 144–162.Google Scholar

Coleman, K., Pranger, L., Maier, A., Lambeth, S. P., Perlman, J. E., Thiele, E., & Schapiro, S. J. (2008). Training rhesus macaques for venipuncture using positive reinforcement techniques: A comparison with chimpanzees. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 47(1), 37–41.Google Scholar

Cox, M., Gaglione, E., Prowten, P., & Noonan, M. (1996). Food preferences communicated via symbol discrimination by a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus). Aquatic Mammals, 22, 3–10.Google Scholar

Crawford, E. (2012). An elephant never forgets … the right microclimate: Thermal comfort and microclimatic design of Asian elephant zoo enclosures (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Guelph, Ontario: The University of Guelph,.Google Scholar

da Silva Vasconcellos, A., Adania, C. H., & Ades, C. (2012). Contrafreeloading in maned wolves: Implications for their management and welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 140(1), 85–91.Google Scholar

Dawkins, M. S. (1990). From an animal’s point of view: Motivation, fitness, and animal welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 1–9.Google Scholar

Deamer, K. (2017). Dutch zoo tests ‘Tinder for Orangutans’ mating program. Live Science, Retrieved from www.livescience.com/57746-tinder-for-orangutans-mating-program.html.Google Scholar

Desmond, T., & Laule, G. (1991). Protected contact elephant training. In Proceedings of the American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Annual Conference, San Diego, CA. Retrieved from http://activeenvironments.org/pdf/PC_Elephant_Training.pdf.Google Scholar

Dettmer, E. L., Phillips, K. A., Rager, D. R., Bernstein, I. S., & Fragaszy, D. M. (1996). Behavioral and cortisol responses to repeated capture and venipuncture in Cebus apella. American Journal of Primatology, 38(4), 357–362.Google Scholar

Dorey, N. R., Mehrkam, L. R., & Tacey, J. (2015). A method to assess relative preference for training and environmental enrichment in captive wolves (Canis lupus and Canis lupus arctos). Zoo Biology, 34(6), 513–517.Google Scholar

Dorman, N., & Bourne, D. C. (2010). Canids and ursids in mixed‐species exhibits. International Zoo Yearbook, 44(1), 75–86.Google Scholar

Duncan, L. M., & Pillay, N. (2013). Shade as a thermoregulatory resource for captive chimpanzees. Journal of Thermal Biology, 38(4), 169–177.Google Scholar

Fàbregas, M. C., Guillén-Salazar, F., & Garcés-Narro, C. (2012). Do naturalistic enclosures provide suitable environments for zoo animals? Zoo Biology, 31, 362–373.Google Scholar

Fernandez, E. J., Dorey, N., & Rosales-Ruiz, J. (2004). A two-choice preference assessment with five cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 7(3), 163–169.Google Scholar

Gaalema, D. E., Perdue, B. M., & Kelling, A. S. (2011). Food preference, keeper ratings, and reinforcer effectiveness in exotic animals: The value of systematic testing. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 14(1), 33–41.Google Scholar

Gaengler, H., & Clum, N. (2015). Investigating the impact of large carcass feeding on the behavior of captive Andean condors (Vultur gryphus) and its perception by zoo visitors. Zoo Biology, 34(2), 118–129.Google Scholar

Gibson, A. R., Smucny, D. A., & Kollar, J. (1989). The effects of feeding and ecdysis on temperature selection by young garter snakes in a simple thermal mosaic. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67, 19–23.Google Scholar

Goodkin, F. (1976). Rats learn the relationship between responding and environmental events: An expansion of the learned helplessness hypothesis. Learning and Motivation, 7(3), 382–393.Google Scholar

Gregory, T. (2017). Bird bachelorette research may yield crucial answers to zoo animals’ survival. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-bird-breeding-research-the-bachelorette-met-20170209-story.html.Google Scholar

Gresswell, C., & Goodman, G. (2011). Case study: Training a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) to use a nebulizer to aid the treatment of airsacculitis. Zoo biology, 30(5), 570–578.Google Scholar

Halloy, J., Sempo, G., Caprari, G., Rivault, C., Asadpour, M., Tâche, F., … Detrain, C. (2007). Social integration of robots into groups of cockroaches to control self-organized choices. Science, 318(5853), 1155–1158.Google Scholar

Hansen, S. W., & Jensen, M. B. (2006). Quantitative evaluation of the motivation to access a running wheel or a water bath in farm mink. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 98(1), 127–144.Google Scholar

Hardie, S. M., & Buchanan-Smith, H. M. (2000). Responses of captive single-and mixed-species groups of Saguinus to novel nonthreatening objects. International Journal of Primatology, 21(4), 629–648.Google Scholar

Herrelko, E. S., Vick, S.-J., & Buchanan-Smith, H. M. (2012). Cognitive research in zoo-housed chimpanzees: Influence of personality and impact on welfare. American Journal of Primatology, 74(9), 828–840.Google Scholar

Hogan, L. A., Johnston, S. D., Lisle, A. T., Keeley, T., Wong, P., Nicolson, V., … Phillips, C. J. (2011). Behavioural and physiological responses of captive wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons) to regular handling by humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 134(3), 217–228.Google Scholar

Hosey, G. (2008). A preliminary model of human–animal relationships in the zoo. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 109(2), 105–127.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, J. (2005). Is more choice always desirable? Evidence and arguments from leks, food selection, and environmental enrichment. Biological Reviews, 80(1), 73–92.Google Scholar

Huys, Q. J., & Dayan, P. (2009). A Bayesian formulation of behavioral control. Cognition, 113(3), 314–328.Google Scholar

Hyson, J. (2000). Jungles of Eden: The design of American zoos. In Conan, M. (Ed.), Environmentalism in Landscape Architecture (Vol. 22, pp. 23–44). Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collections.Google Scholar

Inglis, I. R., Forkman, B., & Lazarus, J. (1997). Free food or earned food? A review and fuzzy model of contrafreeloading. Animal Behaviour, 53(6), 1171–1191.Google Scholar

Jenny, S., & Schmid, H. (2002). Effect of feeding boxes on the behavior of stereotyping Amur tigers (Panthera tigris altaica) in the Zurich Zoo, Zurich, Switzerland. Zoo Biology, 21(6), 573–584.Google Scholar

Jens, W., Mager‐Melicharek, C. A. X., & Rietkerk, F. E. (2012). Free‐ranging New World primates in zoos: Cebids at Apenheul. International Zoo Yearbook, 46, 137–149.Google Scholar

Kelling, A. S., & Gaalema, D. E. (2011). Postoccupancy evaluations in zoological settings. Zoo Biology, 30(6), 597–610.Google Scholar

Kilgour, R. J., Faure, P. A., & Brigham, R. M. (2013). Evidence of social preferences in big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 91(10), 756–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurtycz, L. M., Wagner, K. E., & Ross, S. R. (2014). The choice to access outdoor areas affects the behavior of great apes. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 17(3), 185–197.Google Scholar

Langman, V. A., Langman, S. L., & Ellifrit, N. (2015). Seasonal acclimatization determined by non‐invasive measurements of coat insulation. Zoo Biology, 34(4), 368–373.Google Scholar

Langman, V. A., & Maloiy, G. M. O. (1989). Passive obligatory heterothermy of the giraffe. Journal of Physiology (UK), 415, 89.Google Scholar

Laule, G. E., Bloomsmith, M. A., & Schapiro, S. J. (2003). The use of positive reinforcement training techniques to enhance the care, management, and welfare of primates in the laboratory. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 6(3), 163–173.Google Scholar

Laule, G., & Whittaker, M. (2007) Enhancing nonhuman primate care and welfare through the use of positive reinforcement training. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 10, 31–38.Google Scholar

Lawson, D. P., Ogden, J., & Snyder, R. J. (2008). Maximizing the contribution of science in zoos and aquariums: Organizational models and perceptions. Zoo Biology, 27(6), 458–469.Google Scholar

Macdonald, C., & Whiten, A. (2011). The “Living Links to Human Evolution” Research Centre in Edinburgh Zoo: A new endeavour in collaboration. International Zoo Yearbook, 45(1), 7–17.Google Scholar

Macri, A. M., & Patterson-Kane, E. (2011). Behavioural analysis of solitary versus socially housed snow leopards (Panthera uncia), with the provision of simulated social contact. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 130(3), 115–123.Google Scholar

Maier, S. F. (1984). Learned helplessness and animal models of depression. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 8(3), 435–446.Google Scholar

Maple, T. L. (2008). Empirical zoo: Opportunities and challenges to a scientific zoo biology. Zoo Biology, 27(6), 431–435.Google Scholar

Maple, T. L., & Finlay, T. W. (1987). Post-occupancy evaluation in the zoo. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 18(1), 5–18.Google Scholar

Martin, M. S., & Shepherdson, D. J. (2012). Role of familiarity and preference in reproductive success in ex situ breeding programs. Conservation Biology, 26(4), 649–656.Google Scholar

Mason, G. J., Cooper, J., & Clarebrough, C. (2001). Frustrations of fur-farmed mink. Nature, 410, 35–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGowan, R. T., Rehn, T., Norling, Y., & Keeling, L. J. (2014). Positive affect and learning: Exploring the “eureka effect” in dogs. Animal Cognition, 17(3), 577–587.Google Scholar

Meehan, C. L., & Mench, J. A. (2007). The challenge of challenge: Can problem solving opportunities enhance animal welfare? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102(3), 246–261.Google Scholar

Melfi, V. A. (2009). There are big gaps in our knowledge, and thus approach, to zoo animal welfare: A case for evidence‐based zoo animal management. Zoo Biology, 28(6), 574–588.Google Scholar

Mellen, J., & Sevenich MacPhee, M. (2001). Philosophy of environmental enrichment: Past, present, and future. Zoo Biology, 20(3), 211–226.Google Scholar

Mellor, D. J., Hunt, S., & Gusset, M. (2015). Caring for Wildlife: The World Zoo and Aquarium Animal Welfare Strategy. Gland: WAZA Executive Office.Google Scholar

Owen, M. A., Swaisgood, R. R., Czekala, N. M., & Lindburg, D. G. (2005). Enclosure choice and well-being in giant pandas: Is it all about control? Zoo Biology, 24(5), 475–481.Google Scholar

Perdue, B. M., Clay, A. W., Gaalema, D. E., Maple, T. L., & Stoinski, T. S. (2012). Technology at the zoo: The influence of a touchscreen computer on orangutans and zoo visitors. Zoo Biology, 31(1), 27–39.Google Scholar

Perdue, B. M., Evans, T. A., Washburn, D. A., Rumbaugh, D. M., & Beran, M. J. (2014). Do monkeys choose to choose? Learning & Behavior, 42(2), 164–175.Google Scholar

Pomerantz, O., & Terkel, J. (2009). Effects of positive reinforcement training techniques on the psychological welfare of zoo-housed chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Primatology, 71(8), 687–695.Google Scholar

Price, E. C., Wormell, D., Brayshaw, M., Furrer, S., Heer, T., & Steinmetz, H. W. (2012). Managing free-ranging callitrichids in zoos. International Zoo Yearbook, 46, 123–136.Google Scholar

Raffaele, P. (2006). Speaking bonobo. Smithsonian Magazine, 37, 74.Google Scholar

Reisberg, S. E., Grove, J., & Bashaw, M. J. (2010). Environmental enrichment for North American river otters. Animal Keeper’s Forum, 37, 340–344.Google Scholar

Ross, S. R. (2006). Issues of choice and control in the behaviour of a pair of captive polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Behavioural Processes, 73(1), 117–120.Google Scholar

Ross, S. R., Schapiro, S. J., Hau, J., & Lukas, K. E. (2009). Space use as an indicator of enclosure appropriateness: A novel measure of captive animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 121(1), 42–50.Google Scholar

Schapiro, S. J., Bloomsmith, M. A., & Laule, G. E. (2003). Positive reinforcement training as a technique to alter nonhuman primate behavior: Quantitative assessments of effectiveness. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 6(3), 175–187.Google Scholar

Sherwen, S. L., Harvey, T. J., Magrath, M. J., Butler, K. L., Fanson, K. V., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2015). Effects of visual contact with zoo visitors on black-capped capuchin welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 167, 65–73.Google Scholar

Soltis, J., Orban, D., Mellen, J., & Perkins, L. (2016). Sound at the zoo. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, San Diego, California.Google Scholar

Sullivan, M., Lawrence, C., & Blache, D. (2016). Why did the fish cross the tank? Objectively measuring the value of enrichment for captive fish. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 174, 181–188.Google Scholar

Tarou, L. R., Kuhar, C. W., Adcock, D., Bloomsmith, M. A., & Maple, T. L. (2004). Computer-assisted enrichment for zoo-housed orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Animal Welfare, 13(4), 445–453.Google Scholar

Teodorescu, K., & Erev, I. (2014). Learned helplessness and learned prevalence: Exploring the causal relations among perceived controllability, reward prevalence, and exploration. Psychological Science, 25(10), 1861–1869.Google Scholar

US Fish and Wildlife Service, Black-footed Ferret Recovery Program (2017). Black-Footed Ferret Managed Care Operations Manual. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar

Veasey, J., & Hammer, G. (2010). Managing captive mammals in mixed-species communities. In: Kleiman, D. G., Thompson, K. V., & Baer, C. K. (Eds.), Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques (2nd ed., pp. 151–161). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wark, J. D., Kuhar, C. W., & Lukas, K. E. (2014). Behavioral thermoregulation in a group of zoo-housed colobus monkeys (Colobus guereza). Zoo Biology, 33(4), 257–266.Google Scholar

Warwick, C., Frye, F. L., & Murphy, J. B. (Eds.) (1995). Health and Welfare of Captive Reptiles. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Whitham, J. C., & Wielebnowski, N. (2013). New directions for zoo animal welfare science. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 147(3), 247–260.Google Scholar

Whittaker, M., & Laule, G. (2012). Training techniques to enhance the care and welfare of nonhuman primates. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice, 15(3), 445–454.Google Scholar

Wilson, S. F. (1982). Environmental influences on the activity of captive apes. Zoo Biology, 1(3), 201–209.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. L., Perdue, B. M., Bloomsmith, M. A., & Maple, T. L. (2015). Rates of reinforcement and measures of compliance in free and protected contact elephant management systems. Zoo Biology, 34(5), 431–437.Google Scholar

Young, T., Finegan, E., & Brown, R. D. (2013). Effects of summer microclimates on behavior of lions and tigers in zoos. International Journal of Biometeorology, 57(3), 381–390.Google Scholar

Baker, K. C., & Aureli, F. (1997). Behavioral indicators of anxiety: An empirical test in chimpanzees. Behaviour, 134, 1031–1050.Google Scholar

Benton, D. (2007). The impact of diet on social, violent and criminal behavior. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 31, 752–774.Google Scholar

Britt, A. (1998). Encouraging natural feeding behavior in captive-bred black and white ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata variegata). Zoo Biology, 17, 379–392.Google Scholar

Britt, S., Cowlard, K., Baker, K., & Plowman, A. (2015). Aggression and self-directed behavior of captive lemurs (Lemur catta, Varecia variegata, V. rubra and Eulemur coronatus) is reduced by feeding fruit-free diets. Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research, 3, 52–58.Google Scholar

Cabana, F. (2014). Pygmy slow loris (Nycticebus pygmaeus) European zoo diet survey. Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research, 2, 39–43Google Scholar

Cabana, F., & Nekaris, K. A. I. (2015). Diets high in fruits and low in gym exudates promote the occurrence and development of dental disease in pygmy slow loris (Nycticebus pygmaeus). Zoo Biology, 34, 547–553.Google Scholar

Cabana, F., & Plowman, A.B. (2014). Pygmy slow loris (Nycticebus pygmaeus) natural diet replication in captivity. Endangered Species Research, 23, 197–204.Google Scholar

Cabana, F., Dierenfeld, E., Wirdateti, W., Donati, G., & Nekaris, K. A. I. (2017). The seasonal feeding ecology of the Javan slow loris (Nycticebus javanicus). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 162, 768–781.Google Scholar

Cabana, F., Dierenfeld, E., Wirdateti, W., Donati, G., & Nekaris, K. A. I. (2018). Trialling nutrient recommendations for slow lorises (Nycticebus spp.) based on wild feeding ecology. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 102, e1–e10.Google Scholar

Calvert, J. J. (1985). Food selection by western gorillas (G.g. gorilla) in relation to food chemistry. Oecologia, 65, 236–246Google Scholar

Charles-Dominique, P. (1977). Ecology and Behavior of Nocturnal Primates: Prosimians of Equatorial West Africa. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Crook, G. (1974). An alternative method of managing the hyperactive child. Paediatrics, 5, 46–56.Google Scholar

Curtis, D. J. (2004). Diet and nutrition in wild mongoose lemurs (Eulemur mongoz) and their implications for the evolution of female dominance and small group size in lemurs. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 124, 234–247.Google Scholar

Das, N., Nekaris, K. A. I., & Bhattacharjee, P. C. (2014). Medicinal plant exudativory by the Bengal slow loris Nycticebus bengalensis. Endangered Species Research, 23, 149–157.Google Scholar

Dempsey, J. L., Britt, A., Iambana, B., Porton, I., Schmidt, D., & Kerley, M. (2002). A survey of the nutrient content of plants consumed by Varecia variegata variegata in Betampona Natural Reserve. American Journal of Primatology, 57S, 31.Google Scholar

Dierenfeld, E. S., & McCann, C. M. (1999). Nutrient composition of selected plant species consumed by semi free-ranging lion-tailed macaques (Macqua silenus) and ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) on St Catherine’s Island, Georgia, U.S.A. Zoo Biology, 18 481–494.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. S., & Ullrey, D. E. (1999). Effect of dietary fiber concentration on apparent digestibility and digesta passage in non‐human primates. I. Ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata variegata and V. v. rubra). Zoo Biology, 18, 529–536.Google Scholar

Godfrey, L. R., Samonds, K. E., Jungers, W. L., Sutherland, M. R., & Irwin, M. T. (2004). Ontogenic correlates of diet in Malagasy lemurs. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 123, 250–276.Google Scholar

Goodchild, S., & Schwitzer, C. (2008). The problem of obesity in captive lemurs. International Zoo News, 55, 353–357.Google Scholar

Hosey, G. (2005). How does the zoo environment affect the behavior of captive primates? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 90, 107–129.Google Scholar

Hosey, G., Melfi, V., & Pankhurst, S. (2009). Zoo Animals: Behaviour, Management and Welfare. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

IUCN (2017). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017-1. Retrieved from www.iucnredlist.org.Google Scholar

Jablonski, N. G., & Crompton, R. H. (1994). Feeding behavior, mastication, and tooth wear in the western tarsier (Tarsius bancanus). International Journal of Primatology, 15, 29–59.Google Scholar

Johnson-Delaney, C. A. (2008). Nonhuman primate dental care. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, 17, 138–143.Google Scholar

Kaumanns, W., Hampe, K., Schwitzer, C., & Stahl, D. (2000). Primate nutrition: Towards an integrated approach. In Nijboer, J., Hatt, J. M., Kaumanns, W., Beijnen, A., & Ganslober, U. (Eds.), Zoo Animal Nutrition. Fürth: Filander Verlag.Google Scholar

Kim, Y., & Chang, H. (2011). Correlation between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and sugar consumption, quality of diet, and dietary behavior in school children. Nutrition Research and Practice, 5, 236–245.Google Scholar

Knott, C. D. (1998). Changes in orangutan caloric intake, energy balance and ketones in response to fluctuating fruit availability. International Journal of Primatology, 19, 1061–1079.Google Scholar

Kuhar, C. W., Fuller, G. A., & Dennis, P. M. (2013). A survey of diabetes prevalence in zoo-housed primates. Zoo Biology, 32, 63–69.Google Scholar

Lease, H.M., & Wolf, B.O. (2011). Lipid content of terrestrial arthropods in relation to body size, phylogeny, ontogeny and sex. Physiological Entomology, 36, 29–38.Google Scholar

Lien, L., Lien, N., Heyerdahl, S., Thoresen, S., & Bjertness, E. (2006). Consumption of soft drinks and hyperactivity, mental distress and conduct problems among adolescents in Oslo, Norway. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1815–1820.Google Scholar

MacLeod, A., Perlman, J., Theisen-Watt, L., & Martino, M. (2003). Return to health: Toward more natural diets. Presented at First Annual Crissey Zoological Nutrition Symposium. Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar

Milton, K. (1999). Nutritional characteristics of wild primate foods: Do the diets of our closest living relatives have lessons for us? Nutrition, 15, 488–498.Google Scholar

Moore, R. (2012). Ethics, ecology and evolution of Indonesian slow lorises (Nycticebus spp.) rescued from the pet trade (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oxford, UK: Oxford Brookes University.Google Scholar

Mowry, C. B., & Campbell, J. L. (2001). Ring-Tailed Lemur (Lemur catta) Husbandry Manual. Silver Spring, MD: American Association of Zoos and Aquariums.Google Scholar

Nekaris, K. A. I., & Rasmussen, D. T. (2003). Diet and feeding behavior of Mysore slender lorises. International Journal of Primatology, 24, 33–46.Google Scholar

Nishihara, T. (1995). Feeding ecology of western lowland gorillas in the Nouabale-Ndoki National Park, Congo. Primates, 36, 151–168Google Scholar

Oftedal, O. T., & Allen, M. E. (1996). The feeding and nutrition of omnivores with emphasis on primates. In Kleiman, D. G., Allen, M. E., Thompson, K. V., & Lumpkin, S. (Eds.), Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques (pp. 148–160). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Oonincx, D. G. A. B., & Dierenfeld, E. S. (2012). An investigation into the chemical composition of alternative invertebrate prey. Zoo Biology, 29, 1–15.Google Scholar

Plowman, A. (2013). Diet review and change for monkeys at Paignton Zoo Environmental Park. Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research, 1, 73–77.Google Scholar

Register, T. C., & Clarkson, T. B. (2009). Social stress, visceral obesity and coronary artery atherosclerosis: Product of a primate adaptation. American Journal of Primatology, 71, 742–751.Google Scholar

Remis, M. J. (1997). Western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) as seasonal frugivores: Use of variable resources. American Journal of Primatology, 43, 87–109Google Scholar

Roberts, S. B., Pi-Sunyer, X., Kuller, L., Lane, M. A., Ellison, P., Prior, J. C., & Shapses, S. (2001). Physiologic effects of lowering calorific intake in non-human primates and non-obese humans. Journal of Gerontology Series A, 56, 66–75.Google Scholar

Rogers, M. E., Maisels, F., Williamson, E. A., Fernandez, M., & Tutin, C. E. G. (1990). Gorilla diet in the Lope Reserve, Gabon: A nutritional analysis. Oecologia, 84, 326–339.Google Scholar

Sabater Pi, J. (1977). Contributions to the study of alimentation of lowland gorillas in the natural state, in Rio Muni, Republic of Equatorial Guinea (West Africa). Primates, 18, 183–204.Google Scholar

Sbeglia, G. C., Tang-Martinez, Z., & Sussman, R. W. (2010). Effects of food, proximity, and kinship on social behavior in ring-tailed lemurs. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 981–991.Google Scholar

Schmidt, D. A., Kerley, M. S., Porter, J. H. & Dempsey, J. L. (2005). Structural and nonstructural carbohydrate, fat, and protein composition of commercially available, whole produce. Zoo Biology, 24, 359–373.Google Scholar

Schwitzer, C., & Kaumanns, W. (2000). Feeding behavior in two captive groups of black-and-white ruffed lemurs (Varecia v. variegata), Kerr 1792. In Nijboer, J., Hatt, J. M., Kaumanns, W., Beijnen, A., & Ganslosser, U. (Eds.), Zoo Animal Nutrition (pp. 119–130). Fürth: Filander Verlag.Google Scholar

Schwitzer, C., & Kaumanns, W. (2001). Body weights of ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata) in European zoos with reference to the problem of obesity. Zoo Biology, 20, 261–269.Google Scholar

Schwitzer, C., Polowinsky, S. Y., & Solman, C. (2009). Fruits as foods. Common misconceptions about frugivory. In Clauss, M., Fidgett, A., Janssens, G., Hatt, J.-M., Huisman, T., Hunnal, J., Nijboer, J., & Plowman, A. B. (Eds.), Zoo Animal Nutrition IV (pp. 131–168). Fürth: Filander Verlag.Google Scholar

Soini, P. (1982). Ecology and population dynamics of the pygmy marmoset, Cebuella pygmaea. Folia Primatologia, 39, 1–21.Google Scholar

Starr, C., & Nekaris, K. A. I. (2013). Obligate exudativory characterizes the diet of the pygmy slow loris Nycticebus pygmaeus. American Journal of Primatology, 75, 1054–1061.Google Scholar

Sussman, R. W. (1977). Feeding behavior of Lemur catta and Lemus fulvus. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (Ed.), Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviors in Lemurs, Monkeys and Apes (pp. 1–36). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, A. B. (2006). Feeding behavior, diet, and the functional consequences of jaw force in orangutans, with implications for the evolution of Pongo. Journal of Human Evolution, 50, 377–393.Google Scholar

Terborgh, J. (1983). Five New World Primates. A Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tutin, C. E., & Fernandez, M. (1985). Foods consumed by sympatric populations of Gorilla g. gorilla and Pan t. troglodytes in Gabon: Some preliminary data. International Journal of Primatology, 6, 27–43.Google Scholar

Videan, E. N., Fritz, J., & Murphy, J. (2007). Development of guidelines for assessing obesity in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Zoo Biology, 26, 93–104.Google Scholar

Wiens, F., Zitzmann, A., & Hussein, N. A. (2006). Fast food for slow lorises: Is low metabolism related to secondary compounds in high-energy plant diet? Journal of Mammalogy, 87, 790–798.Google Scholar

Williamson, E. A., Tutin, C. E. G., Rogers, M. E., & Fernandez, M. (1990). Composition of the diet of lowland gorillas at Lopé in Gabon. American Journal of Primatology, 21, 265–277.Google Scholar

Arluke, A. (1994). Managing emotions in an animal shelter. In Manning, A. & Serpell, J. (Eds.), Animals and Human Society (pp. 145–165). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Arluke, A. (1999). Uneasiness among laboratory technicians. Occupational Medicine, 14(2), 305–316.Google Scholar

Asa, C. & Agnew, M. (2014). Breed early and often: Improving reproductive management through lifetime reproductive planning. Connect, 12–17.Google Scholar

Asa, C.S., Bauman, K.L., Devery, S., Zordan, M., Camilo, G.R., Boutelle, S., & Moresco, A. (2014). Factors associated with uterine endometrial hyperplasia and pyometra in wild canids: implications for fertility. Zoo Biology, 33(1), 8–19.Google Scholar

Association of Zoos and Aquariums (2014). Species Survival Plan^® (SSP) Program Handbook. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums.Google Scholar

Boyle, P., Andrews, B., Dorsey, C., Fouraker, M., Pate, D., Reed, M., & Wiese, B. (2011). Building sustainable zoo populations. Connect, 11–13.Google Scholar

Carter, S. & Kagan, R. (2010). Management of “surplus” animals. In Kleiman, D. G., Thompson, K. V., & Baer, C. K. (Eds.), Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques for Zoo Management (pp. 263–267). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Daigle, C. L., Brown, J. L., Carlstead, K., Pukazhenthi, B., Freeman, E. W., & Snider, R. J. (2015). Multi-institutional survey of social, management, husbandry and environmental factors for the SSP African lion Panthera leo population: Examining the effects of a breeding moratorium in relation to reproductive success. International Zoo Yearbook, 49(1), 198–213.Google Scholar

Graham, S. (1996). Issues of surplus animals. In Kleiman, D. G., Thompson, K. V., & Baer, C. K. (Eds,). Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques for Zoo Management (pp. 290–296). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gray, J. (2017). Zoo Ethics: The Challenges of Compassionate Conservation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gussett, M. & Dick, G. (2011). The global reach of zoos and aquariums in visitor numbers and conservation expenditures. Zoo Biology, 30(5), 566–569.Google Scholar

Hemsworth, P. H. & Coleman, G. J. (2011). Human–Livestock Interactions (2nd edn.). London: Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International.Google Scholar

Hibbard, C., Hogg, C. J., Ford, C., & Embury, A. (2011). Maintaining the status of species management in a changing operating environment: Outcomes over outputs. WAZA Magazine, 12, 6–10.Google Scholar

Lees, C. M. & Wilcken, J. (2009). Sustaining the ark: The challenges faced by zoos in maintaining viable populations. International Zoo Yearbook, 43, 6–18.Google Scholar

Leus, K., Bingaman-Lackey, L., van Lint, W., de Man, D., Riewald, S., Veldkam, A., & Wijmans, J. (2011). Sustainability of European Association of Zoos & Aquaria bird and mammal populations. WAZA Magazine, 12, 11–14.Google Scholar

Lindburg, D. & Lindburg, L. (1995). Success breeds a quandary: To cull or not to cull. In Norton, B. G., Hutchins, M., Stevens, E. F., & Maple, T. L. (Eds.), Ethics on the Ark: Zoos, Animal Welfare, and Wildlife Conservation (pp. 195–208). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Lockyear, K. M., Waddell, W. T., Goodrowe, K. L., & MacDonald, S. E. (2009). Retrospective investigation of captive red wolf reproductive success in relation to age and inbreeding. Zoo Biology, 28(3), 214–229.Google Scholar

Long, S., Dorsey, C., & Boyle, P. (2011). Status of Association of Zoos and Aquariums cooperatively managed populations. WAZA Magazine, 12, 15–18.Google Scholar

Martin, R. A. & Melfi, V. (2016). A comparison of zoo animal behavior in the presence of familiar and unfamiliar people. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 19(3), 234–244.Google Scholar

Munson, L., Moresco, A., & Calle, P. P. (2005). Adverse effects of contraceptives. In Asa, C. S. & Porton, I. J. (Eds.), Wildlife Contraception: Issues, Methods, and Applications (pp. 66–82). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Patrick, P., Matthews, C., Ayers, D., & Tunnicliffe, S. (2007). Conservation and education: Prominent themes in zoo mission statements. The Journal of Environmental Education 38(3), 53–60.Google Scholar

Penfold, L., Powell, D., Traylor-Holzer, K., & Asa, C. (2014). “Use it or lose it”: Characterization, implications, and mitigation of female infertility in captive wildlife. Zoo Biology, 33(1), 20–28.Google Scholar

Powell, D. M. & Ardaiolo, M. (2016). Survey of U.S. zoo and aquarium animal care staff attitudes regarding humane euthanasia for population management. Zoo Biology, 35(3), 187–200.Google Scholar

Powell, D. (2015). Humane euthanasia of animals for population management: Perspectives from a sample of European zoo keepers. Animal Keeper’s Forum, 42(3), 76–78.Google Scholar

Powell, D. & Ardaiolo, M. (2015). Nationwide survey of keeper attitudes and knowledge regarding population management euthanasia: Initial results. Animal Keeper’s Forum, 42(3), 74–75.Google Scholar

Rollin, B. E. (1987). Euthanasia and moral stress. Loss, Grief, and Care, 1(1), 115–126.Google Scholar

Rollin, B. E. (2011). Euthanasia, moral stress, and chronic illness in veterinary medicine. Veterinary Clinics: Small Animal Practice, 41(3), 651–659.Google Scholar

Rollin, B. E. (2016). A New Basis for Animal Ethics: Telos and Common Sense. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar

Rohlf, V. & Bennett, P. (2005). Perpetration-induced traumatic stress in persons who euthanize nonhuman animals in surgeries, animal shelters, and laboratories. Society & Animals, 13(3), 201–219.Google Scholar

Saunders, S. P., Harris, T., Traylor-Holzer, K., & Beck, K. G. (2014). Factors influencing breeding success, ovarian cyclicity, and cub survival in zoo-managed tigers (Panthera tigris). Animal Reproduction Science, 144(1–2), 38–47.Google Scholar

Suddendorf, T. (2013). The Gap: The Science of What Separates Us from Other Animals. New York: Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar

World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (2015). Global Species Management Plan Handbook. Gland: World Association of Zoos and Aquariums.Google Scholar

WWF (2016). Living Planet Report 2016. Risk and Resilience in a New Era. Gland: WWF International.Google Scholar