Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:19:45.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Comparative Studies of Science and Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2019

By
David Horn
Edited by
Todd L. Pittinsky
Todd L. Pittinsky
Affiliation:
Stony Brook University, State University of New York
Get access

Summary

Comparison has been at the heart of a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary projects in Europe and the United States, especially since the nineteenth century: anthropology, comparative anatomy, comparative linguistics, comparative literature, comparative politics, comparative religion, and so on Though comparative projects are not restricted to the West or to the modern period, they have functioned, there and elsewhere, in historically and culturally specific ways. In the nineteenth-century West, comparison was often at the heart of efforts to construct or to prop up hierarchies of race, gender, sexuality, and class; to legitimate missionary outreach and colonial government; or to contain the diversity of human histories, cultures, technologies, and forms of knowledge in neat taxonomies and continuous linear narratives.In the later twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, comparison has at times been made to do very different kinds of work: to destabilize hierarchies, to trouble familiar assumptions about identity and difference, to disrupt binary oppositions, or to establish critical distance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Science, Technology, and Society
New Perspectives and Directions
 , pp. 28 - 59
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. B. (1990). Towards a comparative history of eugenics. In The wellborn science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia (pp. 217–232). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adas, M. (1989). Machines as the measure of men: Science, technology, and ideologies of Western dominance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Adas, M. (2006). Testing paradigms with comparative perspectives: British India and patterns of scientific and technology transfer in the age of European global hegemony. In Yengoyan, A. (Ed.), Modes of comparison: Theory and practice (pp. 285–318). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Alder, K. (2002). The history of science, or, an oxymoronic theory of relativistic objectivity. In Kramer, L. & Maza, S. (Eds.), A companion to Western historical thought (pp. 297–381). Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470998748.ch16Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1969). For Marx (B. Brewster, Trans.). London, England: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. (1972). The new scientific spirit (P. Heelan, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Bacon, F. (1620). Novum organum scientiarum. Book 2, Aphorism 129.Google Scholar
Balibar, E. (1978). From Bachelard to Althusser: The concept of the epistemological break. Economy and Society, 7(3), 27–37.Google Scholar
Baviskar, A., Sinha, S., & Philip, K. (2006). Rethinking Indian environmentalism: Pollution in Delhi and fisheries in Kerala. In Bauer, J. (Ed.), Forging environmentalism: Justice, livelihood, and contested environments (pp. 189–256). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernal, J. D. (1946). Science and the humanities [Brochure]. London, England: Birbeck College.Google Scholar
Bernal, J. D. (1969). Science in history (4 Vols.). London, England: Watts.Google Scholar
Bernheimer, C. (Ed.) (1994). Comparative literature in the age of multiculturalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhadra, M. (2013). Fighting nuclear energy, fighting for India’s democracy. Science as Culture, 22, 238–246.Google Scholar
Biagioli, M. (1993). Galileo, courtier: The practice of science in the culture of absolutism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boddy, J. (1988). Spirits and selves in Northern Sudan: The cultural therapeutics of possession and trance. American Ethnologist, 15, 4–27.Google Scholar
Brickman, R., Jasanoff, S., & Ilgen, T. (1985). Controlling chemicals: The politics of regulation in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brooke, J. H. (1991). Science and religion: Some historical perspectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, T. L. (2003). Making truth: Metaphor in science. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Browne, J. (1996). Darwin: A biography (2 Vols.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Butterfield, H. (1931). The Whig interpretation of history. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Butterfield, H. (1951). The origins of modern science, 1300–1800. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Césaire, A. (1945). Poésie et connaissance. Tropiques, 12, 157–170.Google Scholar
Canguilhem, G. (1988). Ideology and rationality in the history of the life sciences (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Choy, T. (2011). Ecologies of comparison: An ethnography of endangerment in Hong Kong. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, L. (2017). A moral technology: Electrification as political ritual in New Delhi. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. S. (1983). More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York, NY: Basic.Google Scholar
Daemmrich, A. (2004). Pharmacopolitics: Drug regulation in the United States and Germany. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Dallal, A. S. (2010). Islam, science, and the challenge of history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Damrosch, D. (2006). Rebirth of a discipline: The global origins of comparative studies. Comparative Critical Studies, 3, 99–112.Google Scholar
Dawes, G. W. (2016). Galileo and the conflict between religion and science. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, J. W. (1874). History of the conflict between science and religion. New York, NY: Appleton.Google Scholar
Eilberg-Schwartz, H. (1990). The savage in Judaism: An anthropology of Israelite religion and ancient Judaism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1937). The notion of witchcraft explains unfortunate events. In Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the Azande (pp. 63–83). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Farmer, P. (1992). AIDS and accusation: Haiti and the geography of blame. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York, NY: Basic.Google Scholar
Feenberg, A. (2010). Between reason and experience: Essays in technology and modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Felski, R., & Friedman, S. S. (Eds.) (2013). Comparison: Theories, approaches, uses. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felt, U., Fochler, M., & Winkler, P. (2010). Coming to terms with biomedical technologies in different technopolitical cultures: A comparative analysis of focus groups on organ transplantation and genetic testing in Austria, France, and The Netherlands. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 35, 525–553.Google Scholar
Ferngren, G. B. (Ed.) (2002). Science and religion: A historical introduction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchist theory of knowledge. London, England: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Figlio, K. (1976). The metaphor of organization: An historiographical perspective on the bio-medical sciences of the early nineteenth century. History of Science, 14, 17–53.Google Scholar
Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact (Trenn, T. & Merton, R., Eds.; F. Bradley & T. Trenn, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fonseca, P. F. C., & Santos Pereira, T. (2014). The governance of nanotechnology in the Brazilian context: Entangling approaches. Technology in Society, 37, 16–27.Google Scholar
Foster, G. (1976). Disease etiologies in non-Western medical systems. American Anthropologist, 78, 773–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1978a). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1978b). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In Bouchard, D. F. (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 139–164). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1985). The use of pleasure (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
Fraser Harris, D. (1912). The metaphor in science. Science, 36(922), 263–269.Google Scholar
Frazer, J. (2012). The golden bough (Vol. 1, 3rd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, S. S. (2013). Why not compare? In Felski, R. & Friedman, S. S. (Eds.), Comparison: Theories, approaches, uses (pp. 34–45). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, S. (2010). Thomas Kuhn: A philosophical history of our time. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Good, M-J. D., Brodwin, P., Good, B. J., & Kleinman, A. (Eds.) (1992). Pain as human experience: Anthropological perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, P. (2013). Religion, science, and empire: Classifying Hinduism and Islam in British India. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Hammerstrom, E. (2015). The science of Chinese Buddhism: Twentieth-century engagements. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (Ed.) (1993). The “racial” economy of science: Toward a democratic future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. K. (1990). Chaos bound: Orderly disorder in contemporary literature and science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hecht, G. (2010). Hopes for the radiated body: Uranium miners and transnational technopolitics in Namibia. Journal of African History, 51, 213–234.Google Scholar
Hesse, M. B. (1966). Models and analogies in science. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Horn, D. (2003). The criminal body: Lombroso and the anatomy of danger. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Horton, R. (1967). African traditional thought and Western science. Africa, 37, 50–71, 155–187.Google Scholar
Horton, R. (1977). African traditional thought and Western science. In Wilson, B. (Ed.), Rationality (pp. 131–171). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Huff, T. (2003). The rise of early modern science: Islam, China and the West (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inda, J. X. (2006). Targeting immigrants: Government, technology, and ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. (2015). Cosmopolitan conceptions: IVF sojourns in global Dubai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, N. (2003). Whigs and stories: Herbert Butterfield and the historiography of science. History of Science, 41, 125–140.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (1986). Risk management and political culture: A comparative study of science in the policy context. New York, NY: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In Jasanoff, S. & Kim, S.-H. (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power (pp. 1–33). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.003.0001Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear regulation in the US and South Korea. Minerva, 47, 119–146.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2013). Sociotechnical imaginaries and national energy policies. Science as Culture, 22, 189–196. doi:1080.09505431.2013.786990Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (Eds.) (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Keller, E. F. (2010). The mirage of a space between nature and nurture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kelman, S. (1981). Regulating American, regulating Sweden: A comparative study of occupational safety and health policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kleinman, A. (1978). Concepts and a model for the comparison of medical systems as cultural systems. Social Science & Medicine. Part B: Medical Anthropology, 12, 85–93.Google Scholar
Kleinman, A., & Good, B. (Eds.) (1985). Culture and depression: Studies in the anthropology and cross-cultural psychiatry of affect and disorder. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1979). Metaphor in science. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 409–419). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (Eds.) (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laqueur, T. (1992). Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, E. (1997). Summer for the gods: The Scopes trial and America’s continuing debate over science and religion. New York, NY: Basic.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1990). Postmodern? No, simply Amodern! Toward an anthropology of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 21, 145–171. doi:10.1016/0039-3681Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor–network theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2010). “Thou shall not freeze-frame,” or, How not to misunderstand the science and religion debate. In On the modern cult of the factish gods (pp. 99–124). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. (1962). The two cultures? The significance of C. P. Snow. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, G. (Ed.) (1987). One culture: Essays in science and literature. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, L. (1925). How natives think (L. Clare, Trans.). New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Lindberg, D. C., & Numbers, R. L. (Eds.) (1986). God & nature: Historical essays on the encounter between Christianity and science. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Livingstone, D. (2014). Dealing with Darwin: Place, politics, and rhetoric in religious engagements. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lock, M. (1993). The politics of mid-life and menopause: Ideologies for the second sex in North American and Japan. In Lindenbaum, S. & Lock, M. (Eds.), Knowledge, power, and practice: The anthropology of medicine and everyday life (pp. 330–363). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lock, M. (2002). Twice dead: Organ transplants and the reinvention of death. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1954). Magic, science and religion. In Magic, science and religion and other essays (pp. 17–92). New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Mansfield, B., & Guthman, J. (2015). Epigenetic life: Biological plasticity, abnormality, and new configurations of race and reproduction. Cultural Geographies, 22, 3–20.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. (1995). (Ed.). Technoscientific imaginaries: Conversations, profiles, and memoirs. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, G., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Martin, E. (1991). The egg and the sperm: How science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male–female roles. Signs, 16, 485–501.Google Scholar
Masco, J. (2006). Nuclear borderlands: The Manhattan Project in post–Cold War New Mexico. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. (1994). The medium is the message. In Understanding media: The extensions of man (pp. 7–21). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1981). The medium is the massage: An inventory of effects. Berkeley, CA: Gingko Press.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa. New York, NY: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and civilization. New York, NY: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Mumford, L. (1964). Authoritarian and democratic technics. Technology and Culture, 5, 1–8.Google Scholar
Needham, J. (1954). Science and civilization in China (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Needham, J. (1969). Science and society in East and West. In The grand titration: Science and society in East and West (pp. 190–217). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Nelkin, D., & Pollak, M. (1982). The atom besieged: Antinuclear movements in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Numbers, R. L. (Ed.) (2009). Galileo goes to jail and other myths about science and religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, R. G. (2006). Science and religion, 1450–1900: From Copernicus to Darwin. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, R. (1958). Analogy in science. Centennial Review of Arts & Science, 2, 351–373.Google Scholar
Parthasarathy, S. (2007). Building genetic medicine: Breast cancer, technology, and the comparative politics of health care. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Patton, K., & Ray, B. (Eds.) (2000). A magic still dwells: Comparative religion in the postmodern age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Petryna, A. (2002). Life exposed: Biological citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pick, D. (1993). Faces of degeneration: A European disorder, c. 1848–1918. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Proctor, R. (1988). Racial hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P. (1995). French modern: Norms and forms of the social environment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, R. (2013). Why compare? In Felski, R. & Friedman, S. S. (Eds.), Comparison: Theories, approaches, uses (pp. 15–33). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, A. (1991). New age—A kinder, gentler science? In Strange weather: Culture, science and technology in the age of limits (pp. 15–74). London, England: Verso.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1997). Religion and science (2nd rev. ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, L. (1987). Skeletons in the closet: The first illustrations of the female skeleton in eighteenth-century anatomy. In Gallagher, C. & Laqueur, T. (Eds.), The making of the modern body: Sexuality and society in the nineteenth century (pp. 42–82). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, L. (1993). Nature’s body: Gender in the making of modern science. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Z. (1982). In comparison a magic dwells. In Imagining religion: From Babylon to Jonestown (pp. 19–35). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C. P. (1964). The two cultures and a second look. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Srinivas, S. (2001). Landscapes of urban memory: The sacred and the civic in India’s high-tech city. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, N. L. (1986). Race and gender: The role of analogy in science. Isis, 77, 261–277.Google Scholar
Tamarkin, N. (2014). Genetic diaspora: Producing knowledge of genes and Jews in rural South Africa. Cultural Anthropology, 29, 552–574.Google Scholar
Tambiah, S. J. (1990). Magic, science, religion, and the scope of rationality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Terry, J. (1999). An American obsession: Science, medicine, and homosexuality in modern society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turda, M., & Gillette, A. (2014). Latin eugenics in comparative perspective. London, England: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B. (1903). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, language, art, and custom (Vol. 2, 4th ed.). London, England: John Murray.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. (1986). National styles of regulation: Environmental policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wade, P., López Beltrán, C., Restrepo, E., & Ventura Santos, R. (Eds.) (2014). Mestizo genomics: Race mixture, nation, and science in Latin America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wajcman, J. (2004). TechnoFeminism. London, England: Polity.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (2001). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
White, A. D. (1896). A history of the warfare of science and theology (2 Vols.). New York, NY: Appleton.Google Scholar
Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wiredu, K. (1976). How not to compare African thought with Western thought. Ch’Indaba, 2, 4–8.Google Scholar
Yengoyan, A. (Ed.) (2006). Modes of comparison: Theory and practice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×