Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:58:46.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - From Childhood in a Ruined German City to Research on Crime and Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2021

By
Friedrich Lösel
Edited by
Richard E. Tremblay
Richard E. Tremblay
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Get access

Summary

Friedrich Lösel was born in Germany in 1945. He is Emeritus Professor at Cambridge University (UK), as well as Erlangen University and Berlin Psychological University in Germany. He received the Stockholm Prize in Criminology, the Sellin-Glueck Award from the American Society of Criminology, and the Joan McCord Award from the Academy of Experimental Criminology. He created the Erlangen–Nuremberg Development and Prevention Study (ENDPS), which combined a prospective longitudinal and experimental design and investigated more than 600 children and their families from kindergarten to adolescence. The ENDPS showed that accumulated individual and social risk factors at preschool age predicted behavior problems in youth, but there was also developmental flexibility. The prevention part of the ENDPS implemented a universal training of child social skills, a parent training on positive parenting, and a combination of both. There were substantial short-term effects and promising outcomes after 10 years. The ENDPS team trained about 2,000 facilitators for a nationwide dissemination of the program. He also carried out an important longitudinal study on school bullying showing that intensive bullying perpetration was not only a school phenomenon but correlated with violence in other contexts and with criminal behavior in adulthood.

Keywords

longitudinal studiesexperimental studiesviolence preventiondevelopmental flexibilitydisseminationbullyingbehavioral problemssocial skills trainingparent trainingcriminal behavior
Type
Chapter
Information
The Science of Violent Behavior Development and Prevention
Contributions of the Second World War Generation
 , pp. 271 - 298
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beelmann, A., Bliesener, T., & Lösel, F. (2000). Dimensions of impulsivity and their relation to antisocial behavior in male adolescents. In Czerederecka, A., Jaskiewicz-Obydzinska, T., & Krakow, C. J. (Eds.), Forensic psychology and law (pp. 49–57). Cracow, Poland: Forensic Research.Google Scholar
Beelmann, A., & Lösel, F. (2019 ). A comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized evaluations of the effect of child social skills training on antisocial development. (under review).Google Scholar
Bender, D., Bliesener, T., & Lösel, F. (1996). Deviance or resilience? A longitudinal study of adolescents in residential care. In Davies, G., Lloyd-Bostock, S., McMurran, M., & Wilson, C. (Eds.), Psychology, law, and criminal justice (pp. 409–423). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bender, D., & Lösel, F. (1997). Protective and risk effects of peer relations and social support on antisocial behaviour in adolescents from multi-problem milieus. Journal of Adolescence, 20(6), 661–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bender, D., & Lösel, F. (2006). Working with violent children in German youth services: Results of a survey. In Hagell, A. & Dent, R. J. (Eds.), Children who commit acts of serious interpersonal violence: Messages for practice (pp. 167–185). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Bender, D., & Lösel, F. (2011). Bullying at school as a predictor of delinquency, violence and other anti‐social behaviour in adulthood. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(2), 99–106.Google Scholar
Bender, D., & Lösel, F. (2015). Resting and stress-induced heart rate and antisocial behavior in youth: A study on moderator effects and longitudinal relations. Paper presented at the Conference of the European Society of Criminology, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
Bernard, T. (1990). Twenty years of testing theories: What have we learned and why? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27(4), 325–347.Google Scholar
Blickhan, C., Braune, P., Klapprott, J., Linz, P., & Lösel, F. (1978). Psychologische Fortbildung für den Strafvollzug [Psychological training of prison staff]. Stuttgart, Germany: Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
Bliesener, T., Beelmann, A., & Stemmler, M. (Eds.). (2012). Antisocial behavior and crime: Contributions of developmental and evaluation research to prevention and intervention. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Brambring, M., Lösel, F., & Skowronek, H. (Eds.). (1989). Children at risk: Assessment, longitudinal research and intervention. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bühler, A., Kötter, C., Jaursch, S., & Lösel, F. (2011). Prevention of familial transmission of depression: EFFEKT-E, a selective program for emotionally burdened families. Journal of Public Health, 19(4), 321–327.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. A., & Piquero, A. R. (2009). New evidence on the monetary value of saving a high risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 25–49.Google Scholar
Coid, J. W. (2003). Formulating strategies for the primary prevention of adult antisocial behaviour: ‘High risk’ or ‘population’ strategies? In Farrington, D. P. & Coid, J. W. (Eds.), Early prevention of adult antisocial behaviour. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S. (2003). A biopsychosocial model of the development of chronic conduct problems in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 349–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrington, D. P., Gaffney, H., Lösel, F., & Ttofi, M. M. (2017). Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of developmental prevention programs in reducing delinquency, aggression, and bullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 91–106.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P., Lösel, F., Boruch, R. F., Gottfredson, D. C., Mazerolle, L., Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (2019). Advancing knowledge about replication in criminology. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 373–396.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P., Lösel, F., Braga, A. A., Mazerolle, L., Raine, A., Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (2020). Experimental criminology: Looking back and forward on the 20th anniversary of the Academy of Experimental Criminology. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1–25.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P., Ohlin, L. E., & Wilson, J. Q. (1986). Understanding and controlling crime: Toward a new research strategy. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1968). Unraveling juvenile delinquency (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., & Harachi, T. W. (1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In Loeber, R. & Farrington, D. P. (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hurrelmann, K., Kaufmann, F.-X., & Lösel, F. (Eds.). (1987). Social intervention: Potential and constraints. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hurrelmann, K., & Lösel, F. (Eds.). (1990). Health hazards in adolescence. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jaursch, S., & Lösel, F. (2011). Mütterliche Berufstätigkeit und kindliches Sozialverhalten: A longitudinal study [Maternal employment and children’s social behavior]. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 20, 164–172.Google Scholar
Kershaw, I. (2016). To hell and back: Europe 1914–1949. London, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Koglin, U., & Lösel, F. (2014). Pregnancy and birth complications and externalizing behavioral problems in preschoolers. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform/Journal of Criminology and Penal Reform, 97, 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanskey, C., Lösel, F., Markson, L., & Souza, K. A. (2016). Children’s contact with their imprisoned fathers and the father–child relationship following release: An interactional perspective. Families, Relationships and Societies, 5, 43–58.Google Scholar
Lanskey, C., Lösel, F., Markson, L., & Souza, K. A. (2019). Prisoners’ families’ research: Developments, debates and directions. In Hutton, M. & Moran, D. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of prison and the family (pp. 15–40). Abingdon, England: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Lipsey, M. W. (1992). The effect of treatment on juvenile delinquents: Results from meta-analysis. In Lösel, F., Bender, D., & Bliesener, T. (Eds.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 131–143). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lipton, D. S., Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A survey of treatment evaluation studies. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Lösel, F. (1975). Handlungskontrolle und Jugenddelinquenz: Persönlichkeitspsycholo-gische Erklärungsansätze delinquenten Verhaltens - Theoretische Integration und empirische Prüfung [Self- control and juvenile delinquency: Integration of personality theories on delinquency and an empirical test]. Stuttgart, Germany: Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
Lösel, F. (1978). Über elementare Konzepte sozialer Devianz und ihre Beziehungen. Ein Beitrag zur Explikation und ein empirischer Prüfversuch [Elementary models of social deviance and their relation: An explication and an empirical test]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 9, 2–18.Google Scholar
Lösel, F. (1980). On the differentiation of cognitive reflection–impulsivity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 1311–1324.Google Scholar
Lösel, F. (2007). It’s never too early and never too late: Towards an integrated science of developmental intervention in criminology. Criminologist, 35(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
Lösel, F. (2012a). Entwicklungsbezogene Prävention von Gewalt und Kriminalität: Ansätze und Wirkungen [Developmental prevention of violence and crime: Approaches and effects]. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Kriminologie, 6, 71–84.Google Scholar
Lösel, F. (2014). Was tun mit dem Reichsparteitagsgelände? Bemerkungen aus psychologischer Sicht. [What to do with the Nazi Rally Area? Remarks from a psychological perspective]. In BauLust, (Ed.), Positionen 2014: Zum Umgang mit dem Reichsparteitagsgelände und der Zeppelintribüne [Reflections on what to do with the Zeppelin Tribune and the Nazi Rally Area] (pp. 8–15). Nuremberg, Germany: BauLust Initiative for Architecture and Community.Google Scholar
Lösel, F. (2017). Self-control as a theory of crime: A brief stocktaking after 27/42 years. In Bijlefeld, C. & Laan, P. v. d. (Eds.), Liber amoricum for Gerben Bruinsma (pp. 232–238). The Hague, the Netherlands: Boom.Google Scholar
Lösel, F. (2018). Evidence comes by replication, but needs differentiation: The reproducibility issue in science and its relevance for criminology. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(3), 257–278.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Beelmann, A. (2003). Effects of child skills training in preventing antisocial behavior: A systematic review of randomized evaluations. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 84–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lösel, F., Beelmann, A., Stemmler, M., & Jaursch, S. (2006). Prävention von problemen des sozialverhaltens im vorschulalter: Evaluation des Eltern- und Kindertrainings EFFEKT. [Prevention of conduct problems in preschool age: Evaluation of the parent- and child-oriented program EFFEKT]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 35(2), 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lösel, F., & Bender, D. (2003). Protective factors and resilience. In Farrington, D. P. & Coid, J. (Eds.), Early prevention of adult antisocial behaviour (pp. 130–204). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Bender, D. (2005). Protektive Faktoren der Ehequalität and Ehestabilität [Protective factors of marital quality and stability]. Research report. Berlin, Germany: German Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Bender, D. (2017). Parenting and family-oriented programmes for preventing child behaviour problems. What the evidence tells us. Journal of Family Research, 11, 217–239.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., Bender, D., Jugl, I., & King, S. (2019). Resilience against political and religious extremism, radicalization, and related violence: A systematic review of studies on protective factors. In Weisburd, D., Savona, E., Hasisi, B., & Calderoni, F. (Eds.), Understanding recruitment to organized crime and terrorism: Social, psychological and economic drivers. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., Bender, D., Sünkel, Z., & Stemmler, M. (2016). Self-reported juvenile delinquency in three surveys over 38 years: A German study on the crime drop. In Kapardis, A. & Farrington, D. P. (Eds.), The psychology of crime, policing and courts (pp. 24–43). Milton Park, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Bliesener, T. (1994). Some high-risk adolescents do not develop conduct problems: A study of protective factors. Journal of Behavioral Development, 17(4), 753–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lösel, F., & Bliesener, T. (1990). Resilience in adolescence: A study on the generalizability of protective factors. Health Hazards in Adolescence, 299–320.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Bliesener, T. (2003a). Aggression und Delinquenz unter Jugendlichen: Untersuchungen von kognitiven und sozialen Bedingungen [Aggression and delinquency in adolescence: Studies on cognitive and social origins]. Neuwied, Germany: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Bliesener, T. (2003b). Hooligan violence: A study on its prevalence, origins, and prevention. In Dünkel, F. & Drenkhahn, K. (Eds.), Youth violence: New patterns and local responses (pp. 245–265). Mönchengladbach, Germany: Forum Verlag.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., Bliesener, T., & Bender, D. (2007). Social information processing, experiences of aggression in social contexts, and aggressive behavior in adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(3), 330–347.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., Bliesener, T., Fischer, T., & Pabst, M. (2001). Hooliganismus in Deutschland: Ursachen, Entwicklung, Prävention und Intervention [Football hooliganism in Germany: Origins, development, prevention, and intervention]. Berlin, Germany: German Federal Ministry of the Interior.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., Dillig, P., Wüstendörfer, W., & Linz, P. (1974). Über Zusammenhänge zwischen Merkmalen der sozialen Umwelt und der Kriminalitätsbelastung jugendlicher Straftäter [Relations between characteristics of the social environment and juvenile delinquency]. Monatsschrift fur Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 57, 198–213.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Farrington, D. (2012). Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2), S8–S23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lösel, F., King, S., Bender, D., & Jugl, I. (2018). Protective factors against extremism and violent radicalization: A systematic review of research. International Journal of Developmental Science, 12, 89–102.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Köferl, P. (1989). Evaluation research on correctional treatment in West Germany: A meta-analysis. In Wegener, H., Lösel, F., & Haisch, J. (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 334–355). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lösel, F., Köferl, P., & Weber, F. (1987). Meta-Evaluation der Sozialtherapie [Meta-evaluation of social-therapeutic prisons]. Stuttgart, Germany: Enke.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., Link, E., Schmucker, M., Bender, D., Breuer, M., Carl, L., … Lauchs, L. (2019). On the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment in prisons: A comparison of two different evaluation designs in routine practice (Online). Sexual Abuse.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., Pugh, G., Markson, L., Souza, K. A., & Lanskey, C. (2012). Risk and protective factors in the resettlement of imprisoned fathers with their families. Norwich, England: Ormiston Children and Families Trust.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2004). Psychopathy, risk taking, and attention: A differentiated test of the somatic marker hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113(4), 522–529.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(1), 117–146.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2017). Treatment of sexual offenders: Concepts and empirical evaluations. In Sanders, T. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook on sex offences and sex offenders (pp. 392–414). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., Schmucker, M., Plankensteiner, B., & Weiss, M. (2006). Bestandsaufnahme und Evaluation der Elternbildung [Survey and evaluation of parent education in Germany]. Berlin, Germany: Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Stemmler, M. (2012a). Continuity and patterns of externalizing and internalizing behavior problems in girls: A variable-and person-oriented study from preschool to youth age. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54(3), 307–319.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., & Stemmler, M. (2012b). Preventing child behavior problems in the Erlangen–Nuremberg Development and Prevention Study: Results from preschool to secondary school age. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6(2), 214–224.Google Scholar
Lösel, F., Stemmler, M., & Bender, D. (2013). Long-term evaluation of a bimodal universal prevention program: Effects on antisocial development from kindergarten to adolescence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(4), 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lösel, F., & Wittmann, W. (1989). The relationship of treatment integrity and intensity to outcome criteria. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 42, 97–108.Google Scholar
Lösel, F. A., Koehler, J. A., Hamilton, L., Humphreys, D. K., & Akoensi, T. D. (2011). Strengthening transnational approaches to reducing reoffending: Final report. London, England: UK Ministry of Justice and European Commission.Google Scholar
Markson, L., Lamb, M. E., & Lösel, F. (2016). The impact of contextual family risks on prisoners’ children’s behavioural outcomes and the potential protective role of family functioning moderators. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(3), 325–340.Google Scholar
Markson, L., Lösel, F., Souza, K. A., & Lanskey, C. (2015). Male prisoners’ family relationships and resilience in resettlement. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 15(4), 423–441.Google Scholar
Mews, A., Di Bella, L., & Purver, M. (2017). Impact evaluation of the prison-based Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme (Ministry of Justice Analytical Series). London, England.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1969). Psychology as a means of promoting human welfare. American Psychologist, 24(12), 1063–1075.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
Runkel, D., Lösel, F., Stemmler, M., & Jaursch, S. (2017). Preventing social behavior problems in children from deprived migrant families: Evaluation of a child and parent training in Europe. Research Report. Erlangen, Germany: Department of Psychology, University of Erlangen–Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Schmucker, M., & Lösel, F. (2017). Sexual offender treatment for reducing recidivism among convicted sex offenders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13(1), 1–75.Google Scholar
Souza, K. A., Lösel, F., Markson, L., & Lanskey, C. (2015). Pre‐release expectations and post‐release experiences of prisoners and their (ex‐) partners. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(2), 306–323.Google Scholar
Stemmler, M., & Lösel, F. (2015). Developmental pathways of externalizing behavior from preschool age to adolescence: An application of general growth mixture modeling. In Stemmler, M., Eye, A. V., & Wiedermann, W. (Eds.), Dependent data in social sciences research: Forms, issues, and methods of analysis (pp. 91–106). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Toman, W. (1959). A general formula for the quantitative treatment of human motivation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toman, W. (1961). Family constellation: Theory and practice of a psychological game. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Wallner, S., Lösel, F., Stemmler, M., & Corrado, R. (2018). The validity of the Cracow Instrument in the prediction of antisocial development in preschool children: A five-year longitudinal community-based study. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17(2), 181–194.Google Scholar
Weiss, M., Schmucker, M., & Lösel, F. (2015). Meta-Analyse zur Wirkung familienbezogener Präventionsmaßnahmen in Deutschland [Meta-analysis on the effects of family-oriented prevention programs in Germany]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Pychotherapie, 44, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, D. J., & Farrington, D. P. (1973). Who becomes delinquent? London, England: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×