Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T10:38:21.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Schopenhauer's philosophy of architecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Dale Jacquette
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

AGAINST THE CLASSICIST PARADIGM

Schopenhauer's The World as Will and Representation marks the boundary between the classical and modern paradigms of architectural knowledge. Since the Italian Renaissance, the reciprocity between structure, function, and art in architecture had always been problematic. Yet, up until the eighteenth century, architectural theorists broadly agreed on Vitruvius' dictum that architecture “must be built with due reference to durability, convenience, and beauty.” With classical treatises, the Vitruvian trinity portrayed architecture as an objective system. The most important element of this doctrine was the belief that all architectural forms and relations were rooted in the imitation of nature.

Economic and intellectual upheavals during the eighteenth century recast the foundations of architectural knowledge from objective nature to the subjective mind. Individual drives and behavior were increasingly studied as the key to understanding architectural form. The Vitruvian trinity, however, did not work as well as a mirror of the human mind as it did of nature. By Schopenhauer's time, in the wake of new discourses on utility and pleasure, rule and imagination, and cognition and perception, the Vitruvian trinity began to seem outdated. The modern aesthetic brought down architecture's classical edifice. In particular, Schopenhauer's aesthetic annexed architecture to the subjective Will and in turn redefined the classical notions of function, beauty, and structure.

Working from the non-instrumental framework developed within late eighteenth-century German philosophy, Schopenhauer denied artistic meaning to architecture's functional role.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×