Book contents
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Legal Cases
- Resolutions, Statutes, and Treaties
- 1 Progress and Pushback in the Judicialization of Human Rights
- 2 Backlash in Theoretical Context
- 3 The Politics of Withdrawal
- 4 Replacing the International Justice Regime
- 5 Bureaucrats, Budgets, and Backlash: Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts
- 6 Doctrinal Challenges
- 7 How to Save the International Justice Regime
- Appendix Additional Human Rights Courts, Quasi-Judicial Human Rights Institutions, and International and Hybrid Criminal Tribunals
- Select Bibliography
- Index
3 - The Politics of Withdrawal
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2021
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Saving the International Justice Regime
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Legal Cases
- Resolutions, Statutes, and Treaties
- 1 Progress and Pushback in the Judicialization of Human Rights
- 2 Backlash in Theoretical Context
- 3 The Politics of Withdrawal
- 4 Replacing the International Justice Regime
- 5 Bureaucrats, Budgets, and Backlash: Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts
- 6 Doctrinal Challenges
- 7 How to Save the International Justice Regime
- Appendix Additional Human Rights Courts, Quasi-Judicial Human Rights Institutions, and International and Hybrid Criminal Tribunals
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Chapter 3 considers the politics of state withdrawal from international human rights and criminal courts. This is perhaps the most ostentatious form of backlash politics. Despite states’ threats that they will withdraw from international courts, however, very few threatened withdrawals ever materialize. Using the theoretical framework established in Chapter 2, this chapter considers the experiences of Peru, Venezuela, and Columbia. Venezuela has withdrawn from the Inter-American Human Rights System, while Peru came quite close to withdrawing from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the waning days of the Fujimori regime. In contrast, Colombia has never enacted such threats. This chapter explains why these three states have had such different experiences with respect to withdrawals from the Inter-American human rights regime.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Saving the International Justice RegimeBeyond Backlash against International Courts, pp. 62 - 87Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021