from Part I - Formalising a Same-Sex Relationship: Marriage and Partnership
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 September 2018
‘Central Europe’, for the purposes of the present chapter, is made up of Austria, the Benelux countries, France, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom. At first glance, this area seems best characterised by the phrase ‘steady progress’ as far as same-sex couples are concerned: since the second ‘Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships in Europe’ conference was held in 2011, same-sex marriage has been introduced in France (2013), England and Wales (2013), Scotland (2014), Luxembourg (2015) and Ireland (2015). Nonetheless, a few quirks are revealed when these legal systems are more closely scrutinised. Furthermore, taken together they provide an opportunity for fruitful comparisons and a useful starting point for theoretical discussion.
In all of these jurisdictions, same-sex couples can choose between at least two of three conceivable options: marriage, a registered partnership and the default option of non-registration. This seems to suggest that these three options should be discussed successively. However, not only do marriage and registered partnerships share the characteristic of being formalised through the intervention of a public authority, unlike de facto relationships, they also entertain a dialectic relationship that can best be described by grouping them together. Moreover, de facto relationships raise some specific issues, which further justifies them being analysed separately. Formalised relationships will thus be tackled first (section 1), then de facto relationships (section 2), followed by brief concluding remarks (section 3).
FORMALISED RELATIONSHIPS: MARRIAGE AND REGISTERED PARTNERSHIPS
As far as formalised same-sex relationships are concerned, the systems of registration adopted by the jurisdictions gathered under the ‘Central Europe’ umbrella can be assigned to one of the three categories identified by Ian Curry-Sumner: the pluralistic (section 1.1), monistic (section 1.2) and dualistic (section 1.3) models of registration. The situation in Britain is extremely peculiar as a result of legislation having been paused in an unlikely place; England and Wales, together with Scotland, should thus be dealt with separately (section 1.4).
PLURALISTIC SYSTEMS: BELGIUM, FRANCE, THE NETHERLANDS, LUXEMBOURG
In a pluralistic system, ‘couples are offered two possibilities for formalising their relationship, irrespective of their gender, namely marriage or a form of non-marital registered relationship’.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.