Bainham, A., Children: The Modern Law, 3rd ed. (London: Family Law, 2005).Google Scholar

Bainham, A. and Gilmore, S., Children: The Modern Law, 4th ed. (London: Family Law, 2013).Google Scholar

Ball, C., Same-Sex Marriage and Children (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bracken, L., Child Law in Ireland (Dublin: Clarus Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Buck, T., International Child Law (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar

Detrick, S. (ed.), The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Guide to the ‘Travaux Preparatoires’ (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eekelaar, J., Family Law and Personal Life, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fineman, M., The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar

Fortin, J., Children’s Rights and the Developing Law, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golombok, S., Modern Families: Parents and Children in New Family Forms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golombok, S., Parenting: What Really Counts? (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar

Herring, J., Family Law, 5th ed. (Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 2011).Google Scholar

Lowe, N. and Douglas, G., Bromley’s Family Law, 10th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Mallon, G., Gay Men Choosing Parenthood (Columbia: Columbia University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLanahan, S. and Sandefur, G., Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Schäfer, I., The Law of Access to Children (Cape Town: LexisNexis, 2007).Google Scholar

Shannon, G., Child Law, 2nd ed. (Dublin: Thomson Reuters, 2010).Google Scholar

Thomas, N., Children’s Rights: Policy into Practice (Lismore: Centre for Children and Young People, 2011).Google Scholar

Alston, P.,‘The best interests principle: Towards a reconciliation of culture and human rights’ in Alston, P. (ed.), The Best Interests Principle: Reconciling Culture and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Amos, T. and Rainer, J.,‘Parenthood for same-sex couples in the EU’ in Boele-Woelki, K. and Fuchs, A. (eds.), Same-Sex Relationships and Beyond, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2017).Google Scholar

Appleby, J.,‘Regulating the provision of donor information to donor-conceived children’ in Golombok, S., Scott, R., Appleby, J., Richards, M. and Wilkinson, S. (eds.), Regulating Reproductive Donation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Bainham, A.,‘Parentage, parenthood and parental responsibility: Subtle, elusive yet important distinctions’ in Bainham, A., Day Sclater, S. and Richards, M. (eds.), What Is a Parent? A Socio-Legal Analysis (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar

Blake, L., Ilioi, E. and Golombok, S.,‘Thoughts and feelings about the donor: A family perspective’ in Golombok, S., Scott, R., Appleby, J., Richards, M. and Wilkinson, S. (eds.), Regulating Reproductive Donation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Bracken, L.,‘Gas and Dubois v France’ in Stalford, H., Hollingsworth, K. and Gilmore, S. (eds.), Rewriting Children’s Rights Judgments from Academic Vision to New Practice (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017).Google Scholar

Eekelaar, J., ‘Families and children: From welfarism to rights’ in McCrudden, C. and Chambers, G. (eds.), Individual Rights and the Law in Britain (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Freeman, M.,‘Article 3: The best interests of the child’ in Alen, A., Vande Lanotte, J., Verhellen, E., Ang, F., Berghmans, E. and Verheyde, M. (eds.), A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007).Google Scholar

Friedman, A. and Pantazis, A., ‘Children’s rights’ in Woolman, Stu and Michael, Bishop (eds.), Constitutional Law of South Africa, 2nd ed. (Lansdowne: Juta and Co, Ltd., 2006).Google Scholar

Gamble, N., ‘A better legal framework for United Kingdom surrogacy’ in Golombok, S., Scott, R., Appleby, J., Richards, M. and Wilkinson, S. (eds.), Regulating Reproductive Donation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Beilfuss, C.,‘All or nothing: The dilemma of southern jurisdictions’ in Boele-Woelki, K. and Fuchs, A. (eds.), Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships in Europe: National, Cross-Border and European Perspectives, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2012).Google Scholar

Jadva, V., ‘Surrogacy: Issues, concerns and complexities’ in Golombok, S., Scott, R., Appleby, J., Richards, M. and Wilkinson, S., Regulating Reproductive Donation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Jänterä-Jareborg, M., ‘Parenthood for same-sex Couples: Scandinavian developments’ in Boele-Woelki, K. and Fuchs, A. (eds.), Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships in Europe: National, Cross-Border and European Perspectives, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2012).Google Scholar

Kilkelly, U.,‘The best interests of the child: A gateway to children’s rights?’ in Sutherland, E. and Barnes Mcfarlane, L. A. (eds.), Implementing Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Best Interests, Welfare and Well-Being (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Skelton, A.,‘Parental Responsibilities and Rights’ in Boezaart, T. (ed.), Child Law in South Africa (Cape Town: Juta and Co. Ltd., 2009).Google Scholar

Sloth-Nielsen, J., ‘The contribution of children’s rights to the reconstruction of society: Some implications of the constitutionalism of children’s rights in South Africa’ in Freeman, M. (ed.), Children’s Rights: Volume II (Dartmouth: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2005).Google Scholar

Alston, P., ‘Best interests principle: Towards a reconciliation of culture and human rights’ (1994) 8 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 1.Google Scholar

Amato, P., ‘The consequences of divorce for adults and children’ (2000) 62 Journal of Marriage and the Family 1269–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics, ‘Coparent or second-parent adoption by same-sex parents’ (2002) 109 Pediatrics 339–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics, ‘Task force on the family: Family pediatrics’ (2003) 111 Pediatrics 1541.Google Scholar

Bainham, A., ‘Arguments about parentage’ (2008) 67 Cambridge Law Journal 322.Google Scholar

Bainham, A., ‘Can we protect children and protect their rights?’ (2002) 32 Family Law 279.Google Scholar

Bainham, A., ‘Changing families and changing concepts: Reforming the language of family law’ (1998) 10 Child and Family Law Quarterly 1.Google Scholar

Bainham, A., ‘Rowing back from Re G? Natural parents in the supreme court’ (2010) 40 Family Law 394.Google Scholar

Beeson, D., Jennings, P. and Kramer, W., ‘Offspring searching for their sperm donors: How family type shapes the process’ (2011) 26 Human Reproduction 2415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bernstein, G., ‘Regulating reproductive technologies: Timing, uncertainty, and donor anonymity’ (2010) 90 Boston University Law Review 1189.Google Scholar

Biblarz, T. and Stacey, J., ‘How does the gender of parents matter?’ (2010) 72 Journal of Marriage and Family 3.Google Scholar

Blyth, E., ‘Interviews with surrogate mothers in Britain’ (1994) 12 Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 189.Google Scholar

Blyth, E., Burr, V. and Farrand, A., ‘Welfare of the child assessments in assisted conception: A social constructionist perspective’ (2008) 26 Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 31.Google Scholar

Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L. and Jones, C., ‘Donor conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: A critical analysis of the research evidence’ (2012) 19 Journal of Law and Medicine 769–789.Google ScholarPubMed

Bonthuys, E., ‘The best interests of children in the South African constitution’ (2006) 20 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 23.Google Scholar

Bracken, L., ‘Assessing the best interests of the child in cases of cross-border surrogacy: Inconsistency in the Strasbourg approach?’ (2017) 39 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 368.Google Scholar

Bracken, L., ‘Challenging normative constructions of parentage in Ireland’ (2017) 39 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 316.Google Scholar

Bracken, L., ‘In the best interests of the child? The regulation of DAHR in Ireland’ (2016) 23 European Journal of Health Law 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bracken, L., ‘Strasbourg’s response to gay and lesbian parenting: Progress, then plateau?’ (2016) 24 International Journal of Children’s Rights 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bracken, L., ‘The Assisted Reproduction Bill 2017: An analysis of proposals to regulate surrogacy in Ireland’ (2017) 68 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 577.Google Scholar

Bracken, L., ‘The pre-conception best interests assessment – part 1: Suitability and feasibility’ (2019) 22 Irish Journal of Family Law 16.Google Scholar

Bracken, L., ‘The pre-conception best interests assessment – part 2: Implications for the Irish legal framework’ (2019) 22 Irish Journal of Family Law 2.Google Scholar

Bracken, L., ‘The role of the best interests principle in regulating parentage in surrogacy in Ireland’ (2017) 2 International Family Law 115.Google Scholar

Brewaeys, A., Ponjaert, I., Van Hall, E. and Golombok, S., ‘Donor insemination: Child development and family functioning in lesbian mother families’ (1997) 12 Human Reproduction 1349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brinamen, C., ‘On becoming fathers: Issues facing gay men choosing to parent’ (2000) 61 Dissertation Abstracts International 2794.Google Scholar

Callus, T., ‘First Designer Babies, Now á la carte parents’ (2008) 38 Family Law 143.Google Scholar

Cashmore, J. and Parkinson, P., ‘The use and abuse of social science research evidence in children’s cases’ (2014) 20 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 239–250.Google Scholar

Cheng, S. and Powell, B., ‘Measurement, methods, and divergent patterns: Reassessing the effects of same-sex parents’ (2015) 52 Social Science Research 615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clarke, V., ‘Sameness and difference in research on lesbian parenting’ (2002) 12 Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 210.Google Scholar

Crawshaw, M. and others, ‘Disclosure and donor-conceived children’ (2017) 32 Human Reproduction 1535.Google Scholar

Crawshaw, M., Blyth, E. and Van den Akker, O., ‘The changing profile of surrogacy in the UK: Implications for national and international policy and practice’ (2012) 34 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 265.Google Scholar

Crouch, S., Waters, E., McNair, R., Power, J. and Davis, E., ‘Parent reported measures of child health and wellbeing in same-sex parent families: A cross-sectional study’ (2014) 14 BMC Public Health 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowl, A., Ahn, S. and Baker, J., ‘A meta-analysis of developmental outcomes for children of same-sex and heterosexual parents’ (2008) 4 Journal of GLBT Family Studies 385–407.Google Scholar

Dambach, M., ‘The international legal context governing intercountry adoptions by gay men and lesbians’ (2011) 35 Adoption and Fostering 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dey, I. and Wassoff, F., ‘Mixed messages: Parental responsibilities, public opinion and the reforms of family law’ (2006) 20 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 225.Google Scholar

Duncan, W., ‘Deconstructing parenthood’ (2008) 22(6) The Family in America 1.Google Scholar

Eekelaar, J., ‘Beyond the welfare principle’ (2002) 14 Child and Family Law Quarterly 237.Google Scholar

Eekelaar, J., ‘Rethinking parental responsibility’ (2001) 31 Family Law 426.Google Scholar

Eekelaar, J., ‘The role of the best interests principle in decisions affecting children and decisions about children’ (2015) 23 International Journal of Children’s Rights 3.Google Scholar

Fenton-Glynn, C., ‘International surrogacy before the European Court of Human Rights’ (2017) 13 Journal of Private International Law 546.Google Scholar

Frith, L., ‘Beneath the rhetoric: The role of rights in the practice of non-anonymous gamete donation’ (2001) 15 Bioethics 473.Google Scholar

Gamble, N. and Ghevaert, L., ‘The human fertilisation and embryology act 2008: Revolution or evolution?’ (2009) 39 Family Law 730.Google Scholar

Golombok, S., ‘Disclosure and donor-conceived children’ (2017) 32 Human Reproduction 1532.Google Scholar

Golombok, S. and Tasker, F., ‘Children in lesbian and gay families: Theories and evidence’ (1994) 5 Annual Review of Sex Research 73.Google Scholar

Golombok, S., Blake, L., Casey, P., Roman, G., and Jadva, V., ‘Children born through reproductive donation: A longitudinal study of psychological adjustment’ (2013) 54 Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 653–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Golombok, S., Blake, L., Slutsky, J., Raffanello, E., Roman, G. and Ehrhardt, A., ‘Parenting and the adjustment of children born to gay fathers through surrogacy’ (2018) 89 Child Development 1223–1233.Google Scholar

Golombok, S., Ilioi, E., Blake, L., Roman, G. and Jadva, V., ‘A longitudinal study of families formed through reproductive donation: Parent-adolescent relationships and adolescent adjustment at age 14’ (2017) 53 Developmental Psychology 1966–1977.Google Scholar

Golombok, S., MacCallum, F., Murray, C., Lycett, E. and Jadva, V., ‘Surrogacy families: Parental functioning, parent-child relationships and children’s psychological development at age 2’ (2006) 47 Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry 213–222.Google Scholar

Golombok, S., Mellish, L., Jennings, S., Casey, P., Tasker, F. and Lamb, M., ‘Adoptive gay father families: Parent–child relationships and children’s psychological adjustment’ (2014) 85 Child Development 456.Google Scholar

Golombok, S., Murray, C., Jadva, V., Lycett, E., MacCallum, F. and Rust, J., ‘Non-genetic and non-gestational parenthood: Consequences for parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3’ (2006) 21 Human Reproduction 1918–1924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Golombok, S., Murray, C., Jadva, V., MacCallum, F. and Lycett, E., ‘Families Created Through Surrogacy Arrangements: Parent–Child Relationships in the 1st Year of Life’ (2004) 40 Developmental Psychology 400–411.Google Scholar

Golombok, S., Readings, J., Blake, L., Casey, P., Mellish, L., Marks, A. and Jadva, V., ‘Families created through surrogacy: Mother-child relationships and children’s psychological adjustment at age 7’ (2011) 47 Developmental Psychology 1579–1588.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, T., ‘The UN convention on the rights of the child: And how to make it work’ (1990) 12 Human Rights Quarterly 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris-Short, S., ‘Family law and the Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial restraint or revolution?’ (2005) 17 Child and Family Law Quarterly 329.Google Scholar

Horsey, K., ‘Challenging presumptions: Legal parenthood and surrogacy arrangements’ (2010) 22 Child and Family Law Quarterly 449.Google Scholar

Jacob, M., Klock, S. and Maier, D., ‘Lesbian couples as therapeutic donor insemination recipients: Do they differ from other patients?’ (1999) 20 Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 203.Google Scholar

Jadva, V., Murray, C., Lycett, E., MacCallum, F. and Golombok, S., ‘Surrogacy and the experiences of surrogate mothers’ (2003) 18 Human Reproduction 2196.Google Scholar

Lau, C., ‘The stability of same-sex cohabitation, different-sex cohabitation, and marriage’ (2012) 74 Journal of Marriage and Family 973.Google Scholar

Lee, E., Macvarish, J. and Sheldon, S., ‘Assessing child welfare under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: A case study in medicalisation?’ (2014) 36 Sociology of Health and Illness 500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leiblum, S., Palmer, M. and Spector, I., ‘Non-traditional mothers: Single heterosexual, lesbian women and lesbian couples electing motherhood via donor insemination’ (1995) 16 Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 11.Google Scholar

Levitt, J., ‘Biology, technology and genealogy: A proposed uniform surrogacy legislation’ (1992) 25 Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 451.Google Scholar

Lowe, N., ‘The meaning and allocation of parental responsibility: A common lawyer’s perspective’ (1997) 11 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 192.Google Scholar

MacCallum, F. and Golombok, S., ‘Children raised in fatherless families from infancy: A follow-up of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers at early adolescence’ (2004) 45 Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry 1407.Google Scholar

MacCallum, F., Lycett, E., Murray, C., Jadva, V. and Golombok, S., ‘Surrogacy: The experience of commissioning couples’ (2003) 18 Human Reproduction 1334.Google Scholar

Marshall, A., ‘Comedy of adoption: When is a parent not a parent?’ (2003) 33 Family Law 840.Google Scholar

McCandless, J., ‘Status and anomaly: Re D (contact and parental responsibility: Lesbian mothers and known father) [2006] EWHC 2 (Fam), [2006] 1 FCR 556’ (2008) 30 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 63.Google Scholar

McGrattan, D., ‘No need for a father: The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008’ (2009) 12(2) Irish Journal of Family Law 33.Google Scholar

Messina, R. and D’Amore, S., ‘Adoption by lesbians and gay men in Europe: Challenges and barriers on the journey to adoption’ (2018) 21 Adoption Quarterly 59.Google Scholar

Mnookin, R., ‘Child-custody adjudication: Judicial functions in the face of Indeterminacy’ (1975) 39 Law and Contemporary Problems 226.Google Scholar

Nordqvist, P., ‘“Dealing with sperm”: Comparing lesbians’ clinical and non-clinical donor conception processes’ (2011) 33 Sociology of Health & Illness 114.Google Scholar

Ntlama, N., ‘A brief overview of the Civil Union Act’ (2010) 13 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 191.Google Scholar

Pelka, S., ‘Sharing motherhood: Maternal jealousy among lesbian co-mothers’ (2009) 56 Journal of Homosexuality 195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pennings, G., ‘Disclosure of donor conception, age of disclosure and the well-being of donor offspring’ (2017) 32 Human Reproduction 969.Google Scholar

Perrin, E., Siegel, B. and the Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health, ‘Promoting the well-being of children whose parents are gay or lesbian’ (2013) 131 Pediatrics 1374–1383.Google Scholar

Peterson, J. and Zill, N., ‘Marital disruption, parent-child relationships, and behavior problems in children’ (1986) 48 Journal of Marriage and the Family 295–307.Google Scholar

Price Cohen, C., ‘The role of the United States in the drafting of the convention on the rights of the child’ (2006) 20 Emory International Law Review 185.Google Scholar

Rathus, Z., ‘A call for clarity in the use of social science research in family law decision-making’ (2012) 26 Australian Journal of Family Law 81–115.Google Scholar

Reece, H., ‘The paramountcy principle: Consensus or construct?’ (1996) 49 Current Legal Problems 267.Google Scholar

Regenerus, M., ‘How different are the adult children of parents who have same-sex relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study’ (2012) 41 Social Science Research 752.Google Scholar

Ribar, D., ‘Why marriage matters for child wellbeing’ (2015) 25 The Future of Children 11–27.Google Scholar

Rosato, J., ‘Children of same-sex parents deserve the security blanket of the parentage presumption’ (2006) 44 Family Court Review 74.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, M., ‘Couple longevity in the era of same-sex marriage in the United States’ (2014) 76 Journal of Marriage and Family 905.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, M., ‘Nontraditional families and childhood progress through school’ (2010) 47 Demography 755.Google Scholar

Ross, H., Gask, K. and Berrington, A., ‘Civil partnership five years on’ (2011) 145 Population Trends 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schieb, J., O’Riordan, M. and Rubin, S., ‘Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: Reports from 12–17 year olds’ (2005) 20 Human Reproduction 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stacey, J., ‘Gay male parenthood and the decline of paternity as we knew it’ (2006) 9 Sexualities 27.Google Scholar

Stewart, N., ‘Marriage facts’ (2008) 31 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 313.Google Scholar

Tasker, F., ‘Lesbian mothers, gay fathers, and their children: A review’ (2005) 26 Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 224.Google Scholar

Tobin, J. and McNair, R., ‘Public international law and the regulation of private spaces: Does the convention on the rights of the child impose an obligation on states to allow gay and lesbian couples to adopt?’ (2009) 23 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, A. J. and Coyle, A., ‘What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy’ (2000) 15 Human Reproduction 2041–2051.Google Scholar

Vanfraussen, K., Ponjaert‐Kristoffersen, I. and Brewaeys, A., ‘Family functioning in lesbian families created by donor insemination’ (2003) 73 American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 78.Google Scholar

Adoption Authority of Ireland, Annual Report 2016 (Dublin: Adoption Authority of Ireland, 2016).Google Scholar

American Psychological Association, Lesbian and Gay Parenting (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2005).Google Scholar

American Psychological Association, Lesbian and Gay Parenting (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1995).Google Scholar

Anderson Moore, K., Jekielek, S. and Emig, C., Marriage from a Child’s Perspective: How Does Family Structure Affect Children, and What Can We Do about It? (Washington, DC: Child Trends, 2002).Google Scholar

Center for Marriage and Families, The Scholarly Consensus on Marriage. Fact Sheet No. 2 (New York: Institute for American Values, 2006).Google Scholar

Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Cmnd 9314, 1984).Google Scholar

Committee on the Rights of the Child, Concluding Observations on the Combined Third and Fourth Periodic Reports of India CRC/C/IND/CO/3–4.Google Scholar

Committee on the Rights of the Child, Concluding Observations on the Combined Third and Fourth Periodic Reports of Ireland (March 2016).Google Scholar

Committee on the Rights of the Child, Concluding Observations on the Second Periodic Report of the United States of America Submitted under Article 12 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, adopted by the Committee at its sixty-second session (14 January–1 February 2013) CRC/C/OPSC/USA/CO/2.Google Scholar

Committee on the Rights of the Child, Concluding Observations on the Combined Third and Fourth Reports Submitted by the United States of America under Article 12 (1) of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography CRC/C/OPSC/USA/CO/3–4.Google Scholar

Committee on the Rights of the Child, Concluding Observations on the Combined Fourth and Fifth Periodic Reports of Mexico CRC/C/MEX/CO/4–5.Google Scholar

Committee on the Rights of the Child, Concluding Observations: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, CRC/C/15/ Add 188 (9 October 2002).Google Scholar

Committee on the Rights of the Child, Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 44 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Concluding Observations: Ireland (Committee on the Rights of the Child, 2006).Google Scholar

Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 14 (2013) on the Right of the Child to Have His or Her Best Interests Taken as a Primary Consideration (art. 3, para. 1) CRC/C/GC/14.Google Scholar

Department of Education, ‘Statistical First Release’ SFR 27/2010 (September 2010).Google Scholar

Department of Health, Donor Information Consultation: Providing Information about Gamete or Embryo Donors (London: Department of Health, 2001).Google Scholar

Department of Health, Summary of Responses Received to the Donor Information Consultation: Providing Information about Sperm, Egg and Embryo Donors (London: Department of Health, 2002).Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights, Advisory Opinion Concerning the Recognition in Domestic Law of a Legal Parent-Child Relationship between a Child Born through a Gestational Surrogacy Arrangement Abroad and the Intended Mother, Request no. P16-2018–001, 10 April 2019.Google Scholar

European Parliament, Adoption of Children in the European Union (Briefing, June 2016).Google Scholar

European Parliament, Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2014 and the European Union’s Policy on the Matter (2015/2229(INI)).Google Scholar

Gallagher, M. and Baker, J., Do Mothers and Fathers Matter? The Social Science Evidence on Marriage and Child Well-Being (Washington, DC: Institute for Marriage and Public Policy, 2004).Google Scholar

Government Response to the Report from the Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill, Cm 7209 (October 2007).Google Scholar

Hague Conference on Private International Law, Report of the Experts’ Group on the Parentage/Surrogacy Project (Report February 2017).Google Scholar

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Code of Practice, 9 ed. (London: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 2019).Google Scholar

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Egg and Sperm Donation in the UK: 2012–2013 (London: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 2014).Google Scholar

Iona Institute, Made for Children: Why the institution of Marriage Has Special Status (Dublin: Iona Institute, 2010).Google Scholar

Joint Committee on the Constitutional Amendment on Children, Final Report (Dublin: Joint Committee on the Constitutional Amendment on Children, 2010).Google Scholar

Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill Volume 1: Report, HL Paper 169-I, HC Paper 630-I (2007).Google Scholar

Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission, Building Families through Surrogacy: A New Law (Law Commission Consultation Paper No 244; Scottish Law Commission Discussion Paper No 167, 2019).Google Scholar

Law Commission, Family Law, Review of Child Law, Guardianship and Custody, Law Com No. 172 of 1988 (London: Law Commission, 1988).Google Scholar

Law Reform Commission, Consultation Paper on Legal Aspects of Family Relationships, LRC CP55-2009 (Dublin: Law Reform Commission, 2009).Google Scholar

Law Reform Commission, Report on Legal Aspects of Family Relationships, LRC 101–2010 (Dublin: Law Reform Commission, 2010).Google Scholar

LGBT Ireland, Pathways to Parenting: Proposals for Reform (Dublin: LGBT Ireland, 2018).Google Scholar

New Zealand Law Commission, New Issues in Legal Parenthood, Report 88 (Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission, 2005).Google Scholar

Pillinger, J. and Fagan, P., LGBT Parents in Ireland. Report from a Study into the Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People in Ireland Who Are Parents or Who Are Planning Parenthood (Dublin: LGBT Diversity, 2013).Google Scholar

Rodgers, B., Trinder, L. and Williams, T., Towards a Family Justice Observatory to Improve the Generation and Application of Research (London: Nuffield, 2015)Google Scholar

Scottish Law Commission, Parental Responsibilities and Rights, Guardianship and the Administration of Children’s Property, Discussion Paper No 88 of 1990 (Edinburgh: Scottish Law Commission, 1990).Google Scholar

Shannon, G., Tenth Report of the Special Rapporteur on Child Protection (Dublin: Special Rapporteur on Child Protection, 2016).Google Scholar

South African Law Reform Commission, The Right to Know One’s own Biological Origins, Issue Paper 32 (Pretoria: South African Law Reform Commission, 2017).Google Scholar

Surrogacy UK, Surrogacy in the UK: Further Evidence for Reform. Second Report of the Surrogacy UK Working Group on Surrogacy Law Reform (London: Surrogacy UK, 2018).Google Scholar

Task Force on the Guidelines for the Use of Social Science Research in Family Law, Guidelines for the Use of Social Science Research in Family Law (Madison: Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, 2018).Google Scholar

UN Special Rapporteur on the Sale and Sexual Exploitation of Children, Report to the Human Rights Council, A/HRC/37/60, 15 January 2018.Google Scholar

Witherspoon Institute, Marriage and the Public Good: Ten Principles (Princeton: Witherspoon Institute, 2008).Google Scholar

Bracken, L., ‘The kids are not alright: Why some children are in a legal bind’ RTÉ Brainstorm, 25 May 2018.Google Scholar

Carey, A., ‘Marriage equality: The young movement that swung the Yes vote’, Irish Times, 16 November 2015.Google Scholar

Cullen, P., ‘Proposed sperm and egg donor register “unacceptable” says doctor’ Irish Times, 25 February 2015.Google Scholar

Evershed, N., ‘Think of the kids: Why marriage equality opponents are wrong on parenting’, The Guardian, 17 August 2017.Google Scholar

‘Family court magistrate suspended after objecting to same-sex parents’, Pink News, 18 January 2015.Google Scholar

Gamble, N., ‘Should surrogate mothers still have an absolute right to change their minds?’ Bionews, 22 October 2012.Google Scholar

Gartland, F., ‘Change sought to anomaly in adoption law’ Irish Times, 28 June 2014.Google Scholar

Hunt, E., ‘Your father’s not your father: When DNA tests reveal more than you bargained for’ The Guardian, 18 September 2018.Google Scholar

Kelly, F., ‘Fitzgerald’s children Bill outlines new steps on parentage’, Irish Times, 12 February 2015.Google Scholar

‘Lesbian mums can’t register baby in Italy’ BBC News, 19 April 2018.Google Scholar

MacCormaic, R., ‘Shatter warns Family Bill will end donor-assisted reproduction’ Irish Times, 5 March 2015.Google Scholar

McCormack, C., ‘Naming sperm donors will hit treatment here’ Irish Independent, 8 March 2015.Google Scholar

McDonagh, M., ‘What’s the reality of going it alone through sperm donation?’ Irish Times, 6 September 2016.Google Scholar

McEnroe, J., ‘Tánaiste: No posters “sad and demeaning”’ Irish Examiner, 5 May 2015.Google Scholar

McQuinn, C., ‘Ireland set for award for support of LGBTI community at World Pride event’ Irish Independent, 15 May 2019.Google Scholar

Minihan, M., ‘Who opposes children’s referendum?’ Irish Times, 30 October 2012.Google Scholar

O’Brien, B., ‘Love is not enough when it comes to children’s rights’ Irish Times, 24 January 2015.Google Scholar

O’Halloran, M., ‘Senator calls for donor-assisted reproduction to be restricted’ Irish Times, 27 March 2015.Google Scholar

Quinn, D., ‘Government’s rush to embrace the “new normal” downgrades the natural family’ Irish Independent, 20 February 2015.Google Scholar

Reuters, ‘Thousands march in Paris to repeal same-sex marriage law’ NBC News, 16 October 2016.Google Scholar

Mullen, Ronán, ‘Head to head: Ronán Mullen argues against same-sex marriage’ Irish Times, 22 May 2015.Google Scholar

RTÉ News, ‘Lawyer group say Yes vote for same-sex marriage will affect assisted reproduction rights’ RTÉ News, 15 May 2015.Google Scholar

Scammell, R., ‘Treat surrogate parents as sex offenders, says Italian minister’ The Guardian, 6 January 2016.Google Scholar

The Local, ‘First same-sex overseas adoption takes place in Sweden’ The Local, 5 September 2017.Google Scholar

Tighe, M., ‘Irish surrogacy rates are world’s second-highest’ The Sunday Times, 7 October 2018.Google Scholar

Éireann, Dáil Debates, 25 February 2015.Google Scholar

Evidence presented by Professor Susan Golombok to the Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill. Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill, Volume II: Evidence, HL Paper 169-II, HC Paper 630-II (2007).Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, F., ‘Address by the Minister for Justice and Equality, Frances Fitzgerald TD at the Children’s Rights Alliance Seminar’ (Children’s Rights Alliance Seminar on the Children and Family Relationships Bill 2015, Dublin Castle, 2 March 2015).Google Scholar

Hammarberg, T., ‘The Principle of the Best Interests of the Child: What It Means and What It Demands from Adults’ (Lecture by Thomas Hammarberg, Commissioner for Human Rights, Council of Europe, Warsaw, 30 May 2008).Google Scholar

Hansard, HL, vol 640, col 601, 5 November 2002.Google Scholar

O’Mahony, C. and Bracken, L., ‘The Child’s Right to Family Life: Shifting Sands and Social Science’ (International Journal of Children’s Rights UNCRC 30th Anniversary Conference, 21 June 2019).Google Scholar

Seanad Éireann Debates, 24 March 2015.Google Scholar

Stacey, J., ‘What Is Needed to Defend the Bipartisan Defense of Marriage Act of 1996?’ Hearing before the Subcomm. on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Property Rights of the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, 108th Cong., 4 September 2003.Google Scholar

Von Dadelszen, P., ‘Rights or Obligations? Review of the Guardianship Act 1968’, Triennial New Zealand Law Society Conference and 4th New Zealand Family Law Conference, Christchurch, 6 October 2001.Google Scholar

CoramBAAF, ‘Statistics: England’ www.corambaaf.org.uk/fostering-adoption/looked-after-children-adoption-fostering-statistics/statistics-englandGoogle Scholar

Cryos Denmark, ‘Prices and Payment’ www.dk.cryosinternational.com/donor-sperm/prices-and-payment/Google Scholar

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ‘Remove your donor anonymity’ www.hfea.gov.uk/donation/donors/remove-your-donor-anonymity/Google Scholar

Law Commission, ‘Surrogacy’ www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/surrogacy/Google Scholar

O’Mahony, C., ‘The Constitution, the Right to Procreate and the Marriage Referendum’ Constitution Project @ UCC, 21 April 2015 www.constitutionproject.ie/?p=503Google Scholar