Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent. 2011. “International Practices.” International Theory 3(1): 1–36.Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W., Frenkel-Brunswik, Else, Levinson, Daniel. J., and Sanford, R. Nevitt.. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen, Helfer, Laurence, and Madsen, Mikael. 2016. “How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts.” Law and Contemporary Problems 79(1): 1–36.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. 1970. On Violence. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar

Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K.. 2010. “Who Governs the Globe?,” in Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K. (eds.), Who Governs the Globe? New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar

Barker, Rodney. 2001. Legitimating Identities: The Self-Presentations of Rulers and Subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond (eds.). 2005. Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, and Downs, George W.. 2009. “National Courts, Domestic Democracy, and the Evolution of International Law.” European Journal of International Law 20(1): 59–72.Google Scholar

Biersteker, Thomas J., and Hall, Rodney B. (eds.). 2002. The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Black, Julia. 2017. “‘Says Who?’ Liquid Authority and Interpretive Control in Transnational Regulatory Regimes.” International Theory 9(2): 286–310.Google Scholar

Blake, Daniel, and Payton, Autumn. 2008. “Voting Rules in International Organizations: Reflections of Power or Facilitators of Cooperation?” Paper presented at the ISA’s 49th Annual Convention, 2008, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar

Borchardt, Knut, Hanke, Edith, and Schluchter, Wolfgang (eds.). 2013. Max Weber Gesamtausgabe I/23. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Börzel, Tanja, and Zürn, Michael. 2021. “Contestations of the Liberal International Order: From Liberal Multilateralism to Postnational Liberalism.” International Organization 75(2): 282–305.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Breitmeier, Helmut, Young, Oran R., and Zürn, Michael. 2006. Analyzing International Environmental Regimes. From Case Study to Database. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics. Basingstoke/London: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith P. 1996. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cooley, Alexander. 2005. Logics of Hierarchy: The Organization of Empires, States, and Military Occupations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Daase, Christopher, and Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2015. “Jenseits der Anarchie: Widerstand und Herrschaft im internationalen System.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 56(2): 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daase, Christopher, Deitelhoff, Nicole, Kamis, Ben, Pfister, Jannik, and Wallmeier, Philip (eds.). 2017. Herrschaft in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar

Davis, Kevin E., Kingsbury, Benedict, and Engle Merry, Sally. 2012. “Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance.” Law & Society Review 46(1): 71–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Wilde, Pieter, Leupold, Anna, and Schmidtke, Henning. 2016. “Introduction: The Differentiated Politicisation of European Governance.” West European Politics 39(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Wilde, Pieter, and Zürn, Michael. 2012. “Can the Politicization of European Integration Be Reversed?” Journal of Common Market Studies 50(S1): 137–153.Google Scholar

Doyle, Michael W. 1986. Empires. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. 1986. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. 1995. “Strategic Uses of Arguments,” in Arrow, Kenneth J., Mnookin, Robert H., Ross, Lee, and Tversky, Amos (eds.), Barriers to Conflict Resolution. New York: W.W. Norton, pp. 236–257.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. 1999. “Arguing and Bargaining in Two Constituent Assemblies.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 2: 345.Google Scholar

Enoch, David. 2014. “Authority and Reason-Giving.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89(2): 296–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galtung, Johan. 1972. “Eine strukturelle Theorie des Imperialismus,” in Senghaas, Dieter (ed.), Imperialismus und strukturelle Gewalt. Analysen über abhängige Produktion. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 29–104.Google Scholar

Geis, Anna, Nullmeier, Frank, and Daase, Christopher (eds.). 2012. Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik. Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen (Leviathan Sonderband 40/27). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet, Marks, Gary, Lenz, Tobias, Bezuijen, Jeanine, Ceka, Besir, and Derderyan, Svet. 2017. Measuring International Authority. A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Volume III. Corby: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max. 1987a [1936]. “Allgemeiner Teil,” in Horkheimer, Max (ed.), Studien über Autorität und Familie. Lüneburg: Dietrich zu Klampen Verlag, pp. 3–76.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max, ed. 1987b [1936]. Studien über Autorität und Familie. Lüneburg: Dietrich zu Klampen Verlag.Google Scholar

Hurd, Ian. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53(2): 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurd, Ian. 2007. After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hutter, Swen, and Grande, Edgar. 2014. “Politicizing Europe in the National Electoral Arena: A Comparative Analysis of Five West European Countries, 1970–2010.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52(5): 1002–1018.Google Scholar

Kelley, Judith, and Simmons, Beth. 2015. “Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations.” American Journal of Political Science 59:1146–1161.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Paul. 1989. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Kojéve, Alexandre. 1975. Hegel: Eine Vergegenwärtigung seines Denkens. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico. 2017. “Liquid Authority in Global Governance.” International Theory 9(2): 237–260.Google Scholar

Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Lake, David A. 2010. “Rightful Rules: Authority, Order, and the Foundations of Global Governance.” International Studies Quarterly 54(3): 587–613.Google Scholar

Lindblom, Charles Edward. 1977. Politics and Markets: The World’s Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization 52(4): 943–969.Google Scholar

Milgram, Stanley. 1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Modelski, George. 1987. Long Cycles in World Politics. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Morse, Julia C., and Keohane, Robert O.. 2014. “Contested Multilateralism.” The Review of International Organizations 9(4): 385–412.Google Scholar

Münkler, Herfried. 2005. Imperien. Die Logik der Weltherrschaft – vom Alten Rom bis zu den Vereinigten Staaten. Berlin: Rowohlt.Google Scholar

Nullmeier, Frank, Geis, Anna, and Daase, Christopher. 2012. “Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik: Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen,” in Geis, Anna, Nullmeier, Frank, and Daase, Christopher (eds.), Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik. Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen (Leviathan Sonderband) 40/27. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 11–40.Google Scholar

Peters, Birgit, and Karlsson Schaffer, Johan. 2013. “The Turn to Authority Beyond States.” Transnational Legal Theory 4(3): 315–335.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent. 2016a. “Hierarchy in Practice: Multilateral Diplomacy and the Governance of International Security.” European Journal of International Security 1(1): 5–26.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent. 2016b. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent. 2017. “Against Authority: The Heavy Weight of International Hierarchy,” in Zarakol, Ayşe (ed.), Hierarchies in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent, and Thérien, Jean-Philippe. 2018. “Global Governance in Practice.” Global Policy 9(2): 163–172.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. 2006. “The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception.” Minnesota Law Review 90(4):1003–1044.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. 2009. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John G. 1975. “International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends.” International Organization 29(3): 557–583.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John G. 2004. “Reconstituting the Global Public Domain – Issues, Actors, and Practices.” European Journal of International Relations 10(4): 499–531.Google Scholar

Schmelzle, Cord. 2015. Politische Legitimität und zerfallene Staatlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verlag.Google Scholar

Schuppert, Gunnar Folke. 2010. Staat als Prozess: Eine staatstheoretische Skizze in sieben Aufzügen. Frankfurt, a. M.: Campus.Google Scholar

Sending, Ole Jacob. 2015. The Politics of Expertise: Competing for Authority in Global Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Sending, Ole Jacob. 2017. “Recognition and Liquid Authority.” International Theory 9(2): 311–328.Google Scholar

Sharman, Jason C. 2013. “International Hierarchies and Contemporary Imperial Governance: A Tale of Three Kingdoms.” European Journal of International Relations 19(2): 189–207.Google Scholar

Simmerl, Georg and Zürn, Michael. 2016. “Internationale Autorität: Zwei Perspektiven.” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 23(1): 38–70.Google Scholar

Suchman, Marc C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” The Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.Google Scholar

Tallberg, Jonas, Sommerer, Thomas, Squatrito, Theresa, and Jönsson, Christer. 2013. The Opening Up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tallberg, Jonas and Zürn, Michael. 2019. “The Legitimacy and Legitimation of International Organizations: Introduction and Framework.” The Review of International Organization 14(4): 581–606.Google Scholar

Triepel, Heinrich. 1938. Die Hegemonie. Ein Buch von führenden Staaten. Stuttgart: Kohkhammer.Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo. 2013. “Understanding the Authority of International Courts and Tribunals: On Delegation and Discursive Construction.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 14(2): 381–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viola, Lora A., Snidal, Duncan, and Zürn, Michael. 2015. “Sovereign (In)equality in the Evolution of the International System,” in Huber, Evelyne, Lange, Matthew, Leibfried, Stephan, Levy, Jonah, Nullmeier, Frank, and Stephens, John (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 221–236.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin, Dann, Philipp, and Goldmann, Matthias. 2010. “Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities,” in von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp, and Goldmann, Matthias (eds.), The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions. Advancing International Institutional Law. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, Armin and Venzke, Ingo. 2014. In wessen Namen? Internationale Gerichte in Zeiten globalen Regierens. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System I. Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1978 [1925]. “Chapter III. The Types of Legitimate Domination [Die Typen der Herrschaft],” in Roth, Guenther, and Wittich, Claus (eds.), Max Weber. Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 212–301.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 2013. “Kapitel I. Soziologische Grundbegriffe,” in Borchardt, Knut, Hanke, Edith, and Schluchter, Wolfgang (eds.), Max Weber Gesamtausgabe I/23. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 147–215.Google Scholar

Weingart, Peter. 2008. Die Stunde der Wahrheit? Zum Verhältnis der Wissenschaft zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissensgesellschaft. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje. 2014. A Theory of Contestation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance. Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin, and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias. 2012. “International Authority and Its Politicization.” International Theory 4(1): 69–106.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, Tokhi, Alexandros, and Binder, Martin. 2021. “The International Authority Database.” Global Policy 12(4): 430–442.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., Genschel, Philipp, Snidal, Duncan, and Zangl, Bernhard (eds.). 2015. International Organizations as Orchestrators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., Green, Jessica F., and Keohane, Robert O.. 2016. “Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance.” International Organization 70(2): 247–277.Google Scholar

Andonova, Liliana B., Hale, Thomas N., and Roger, Charles B.. 2017. “National Policy and Transnational Governance of Climate Change: Substitutes or Complements?” International Studies Quarterly 61(2): 253–268.Google Scholar

Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K. (eds.). 2010. Who Governs the Globe? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bartley, Tim. 2003. “Certifying Forests and Factories: States, Social Movements, and the Rise of Private Regulation in the Apparel and Forest Products Fields.” Politics and Society 31(3): 433–464.Google Scholar

Bartley, Tim. 2007. “How Foundations Shape Social Movements: The Construction of an Organizational Field and the Rise of Forest Certification.” Social Problems 54(3): 229–255.Google Scholar

Bartley, Tim. 2014. “Transnational Governance and the Re-Centered State: Sustainability or Legality?” Regulation and Governance 8(1): 93–109.Google Scholar

Bartley, Tim. 2018. Rules without Rights: Land, Labor, and Private Authority in the Global Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barton, John H., Goldstein, Judith L., Josling, Timothy E., and Steinberg, Richard H.. 2006. The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bradford, Anu. 2020. The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Büthe, Tim and Mattli, Walter. 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, Sean B. 2016. The Serengeti Rules: The Quest to Discover How Life Works and Why It Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cashore, Benjamin. 2002. “Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule-Making Authority.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 15(4): 503–529.Google Scholar

Cashore, Benjamin, and Stone, Michael W.. 2012. “Can Legality Verification Rescue Global Forest Governance? Analyzing the Potential of Public and Private Policy Intersection to Ameliorate Forest Challenges in Southeast Asia.” Forest Policy and Economics 18(3): 13–22.Google Scholar

Cashore, Benjamin, Auld, Greame, and Newsom, Deanna. 2004. Governing through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dauvergne, Peter, and Lister, Jane. 2013. Eco-Business: A Big-Brand Takeover of Sustainability. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of Qwerty.” American Economic Review 75(2): 332–337.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.Google Scholar

Dingwerth, Klaus, and Pattberg, Philipp. 2009. “World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance.” European Journal of International Relations 15(4): 707–744.Google Scholar

Eriksen, Stein S., and Sending, Ole J.. 2013. “There Is No Global Public: The Idea of the Public and the Legitimation of Governance.” International Theory 5(2): 213–237.Google Scholar

Fligstein, Neil, and McAdam, Doug. 2012. A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

FSC. 2018. Annual Report 2018, https://annual-reports.fsc.org/en#downloads (last access July 25, 2022).Google Scholar

Gourevitch, Peter A., Lake, David A., and Stein, Janice G.. 2012. The Credibility of Transnational NGOs: When Virtue Is Not Enough. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Green, Jessica F. 2013. “Order out of Chaos: Public and Private Rules for Managing Carbon.” Global Environmental Politics 13(2): 1–15.Google Scholar

Green, Jessica F. 2014. Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gulbrandsen, Lars H. 2005. “Sustainable Forestry in Sweden: The Effect of Competition Among Private Certification Schemes.” The Journal of Environment and Development 14(3): 338–355.Google Scholar

Gulbrandsen, Lars H. 2014. “Dynamic Governance Interactions: Evolutionary Effects of State Responses to Non-State Certification Programs.” Regulation and Governance 8(1): 74–92.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2020. Let Them Eat Tweets: How The Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar

Hall, Rodney B., and Biersteker, Thomas J.. 2002. “The Emergence of Private Authority in the International System.” In: Hall, Rodney B. and Biersteker, Thomas J. (eds.), The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John, and Madison, James. 1961. The Federalist Papers (1787–88). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Hannan, Michael T., and Freeman, John. 1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

IFRS Foundation. 2019. Annual Report 2018, www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/about-us/funding/2018/annual-report-2018.pdf (last access July 25, 2022).Google Scholar

Jung, Danielle, and Lake, David A.. 2011. “Markets, Hierarchies, and Networks: An Agent-Based Organizational Ecology.” American Journal of Political Science 55(4): 972–990.Google Scholar

Johnson, Tara. 2014. Organizational Progeny: Why Governments Are Losing Control over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kinderman, Daniel. 2015. “Explaining the Rise of National Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Global Frameworks, World Culture, and Corporate Interests.” In: Tsutsui, Kiyoteru and Lim, Alwyn (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–146.Google Scholar

Kinderman, Daniel. 2019. “The Challenges of Upward Regulatory Harmonization: The Case of Sustainability Reporting in the European Union.” Regulation and Governance 14(4): 674–697.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.Google Scholar

Lim, Alwyn, and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2015. “The Social Regulation of the Economy in the Global Context.” In: Tsutsui, Kiyoteru and Lim, Alwyn (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Locke, Richard M. 2013. The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Loconto, Allison, and Fouilleux, Eve. 2014. “Politics of Private Regulation: ISEAL and the Shaping of Transnational Sustainability Governance.” Regulation and Governance 8(2): 166–185.Google Scholar

Marx, Axel, and Cuypers, Dieter. 2010. “Forest Certification as a Global Environmental Governance Tool: What Is the Macro-Effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council?” Regulation and Governance 4(4): 408–434.Google Scholar

Milgrom, Paul R., North, Douglass C., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1990. “The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs.” Economics and Politics 2(1): 1–23.Google Scholar

Nooruddin, Irfan, and Sokhey, Sarah W.. 2012. “Credible Certification of Child Labor Free Production.” In: Gourevitch, Peter A., Lake, David A., and Stein, Janice G. (eds.), The Credibility of Transnational NGOs: When Virtue Is Not Enough. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 62–85.Google Scholar

Olegario, Rowena. 2003. “Credit Reporting Agencies: A Historical Perspective.” In: Miller, Magaret J. (ed.), Credit Reporting Systems and the International Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 115–159.Google Scholar

Osiander, Andreas. 2001. “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth.” International Organization 55(2): 251–287.Google Scholar

Overdevest, Christine. 2010. “Comparing Forest Certification Schemes: The Case of Ratcheting Standards in the Forest Sector.” Socio-Economic Review 8(1): 47–76.Google Scholar

Overdevest, Christine, and Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2014. “Assembling an Experimental Regime: Transnational Governance Interactions in the Forest Sector.” Regulation and Governance 8(1): 22–48.Google Scholar

PEFC. 2020. PEFC Annual Review 2019, https://cdn.pefc.org/pefc.org/media/2020-04/428b28a8-8f04-45c0-af1c-d911bc0039b5/430e50ab-6653-50a6-875b-449823c04679.pdf (last access July 25, 2022).Google Scholar

Philpott, Daniel. 2001. Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Roger, Charles, and Dauvergne, Peter. 2016. “The Rise of Transnational Governance as a Field of Study.” International Studies Review 18(3): 415–437.Google Scholar

Rosenau, James N. 2002. “Governance in a New Global Order.” In: Held, David and McGrew, Anthony (eds.), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Malden: Polity Press, pp. 70–86.Google Scholar

Scott, W. Richard, and Davis, Gerald F.. 2007. Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural, and Open System Perspectives. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stroup, Sarah S. and Wong, Wendy H.. 2017. The Authority Trap. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Alan. 2001. American Colonies: The Settling of North America. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Van der Ven, Hamish, Bernstein, Steven, and Hoffmann, Matthw. 2017. “Valuing the Contributions of Nonstate and Subnational Actors to Climate Governance.” Global Environmental Politics 17(1): 1–20.Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Wilks, Stephen. 2013. The Political Power of the Business Corporation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Wong, Wendy H. 2012. Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

WWF-US. 2019. 2019 WWF-US Annual Report, http://assets.worldwildlife.org/financial_reports/37/reports/original/WWF-AR2019-FINALPAGES.pdf?1582917951&_ga=2.172903979.926075631.1592436566-1025158361.1592436566 (last access July 25, 2022).Google Scholar

Young, Oran R. 1994. International Governance: Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Agnew, John. 2005. Hegemony: The New Shape of Global Power. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, Perry. 2017. The H-Word: The Peripeteia of Hegemony. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Barder, Alexander D. 2015. Empire Within: International Hierarchy and Its Imperial Laboratories of Governance. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. 2014. Sovereignty as Symbolic Form. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. 2015. “Sovereignty and the Personality of the State,” in Schuett, Robert and Stirk, Peter M. R. (eds.), The Concept of the State in International Relations: Philosophy, Sovereignty and Cosmopolitanism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 81–107.Google Scholar

Beaumont, Paul. 2020. The Grammar of Status Competition: International Hierarchies as Domestic Practice. PhD dissertation, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.Google Scholar

Bially Mattern, Janice, and Zarakol, Ayşe. 2016. “Hierarchies in World Politics.” International Organization 70(3): 623–654.Google Scholar

Böröcz, József. 1997. “Stand Reconstructed: Contingent Closure and Institutional Change.” Sociological Theory 15(3): 215–248.Google Scholar

Brumfiel, Elizabeth M. 1995. “Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies: Comments.” Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 6(1): 125–131.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian. 1989. The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cooley, Alexander. 2005. Logics of Hierarchy: The Organization of Empires, States, and Military Occupations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Deudney, Daniel H. 2007. Bounding Power: Republican Security from the Polis to the Global Village. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack. 2006. “Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society.” European Journal of International Relations 12(2):139–170.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack. 2012. “The Elements of the Structures of International Systems.” International Organization 66(4): 609–643.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack. 2016. “The Heterarchic Structure of Twenty-First-Century International Governance.” Korean Journal of International Studies 14(1):1–29.Google Scholar

Fei, Xiaotong. 1992. From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York: Picador.Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M. 1988. “Legitimacy in the International System.” American Journal of International Law 82(4): 705–759.Google Scholar

Galtung, Johan. 1971. “A Structural Theory of Imperialism.” Journal of Peace Research 8(2): 81–117.Google Scholar

Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 1991. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hobson, John M., and Sharman, J. C.. 2005. “The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.” European Journal of International Relations 11(1): 63–98.Google Scholar

Hurd, Ian. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53(2): 379–408.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kang, David C. 2010. East Asia before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klotz, Audie. 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. 1997. “Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch.” European Journal of International Law 8(4): 566–582.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Lanoszka, Alexander. 2013. “Beyond Consent and Coercion: Using Republican Political Theory to Understand International Hierarchies.” International Theory 5(3): 382–413.Google Scholar

Larkins, Jeremy. 2010. From Hierarchy to Anarchy: Territory and Politics before Westphalia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lasswell, Harold D. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Lasswell, Harold D., and Kaplan, Abraham. 1950. Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lenski, Gerhard E. 1966. Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Mandel, Ernest. 1975. Late Capitalism, trans. Joris de Bres. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Milner, Helen. 1992. “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique.” Review of International Studies 17(1): 67–85.Google Scholar

Mills, C. Wright. 1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mosca, Gaetano. 1939. The Ruling Class, trans. Hannah D. Kahn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1998. The Republican Legacy in International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas. 2008. International Legal Theory: Essays and Engagements, 1966–2006. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 2013a. Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas. 2013b. “Recognition and the Constitution of Epochal Change.” International Relations 27(2): 121–140.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas. 2017. “Center-Periphery Relations: What Kind of Rule, and Does It Matter?” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 6(1): 5–16.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas, and Klink, Frank F.. 1989. “Anarchy, Authority, Rule.” International Studies Quarterly 33(2): 149–173.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas, and Onuf, Peter. 2006. Nations, Markets, and War: Modern History and the American Civil War. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Oye, Kenneth A. (ed.). 1986. Cooperation under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott, and Shils, Edward A. (eds.). 1951. Toward a General Theory of Action: Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences. Cambridge Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Proust, Marcel. 1946. Du côté de chez Swann. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays in International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Simpson, Gerry. 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2019. Becoming Human: A Theory of Ontology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Towns, Ann E. 2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 16(4): 387–415.Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Weber, Katja. 1997. “Hierarchy amidst Anarchy: A Transaction Costs Approach to International Security Cooperation.” International Studies Quarterly 41(2): 321–340.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1922. Grundriss der Sozialökonomik, III. Abteilung, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, 2 vol., continuous pagination. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391–425.Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, and Friedheim, Daniel. 1995. “Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State.” International Organization 49(4): 689–721.Google Scholar