Book contents
- Rival Byzantiums
- Rival Byzantiums
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Note on the Text
- Additional material
- Introduction
- Part I On the Road to the Grand Narrative
- Part II Metamorphoses of Byzantium after World War II
- Chapter 6 From Helleno-Christian Civilisation to Roman Nation
- Chapter 7 Towards ‘Slavo-Byzantina’ and ‘Pax Symeonica’
- Chapter 8 How Byzantine Is Serbia?
- Chapter 9 Post-Byzantine Empire or Romanian National State?
- Chapter 10 In the Fold of the ‘Turkish-Islamic Synthesis’
- Epilogue and Conclusion
- References
- Index
Chapter 9 - Post-Byzantine Empire or Romanian National State?
from Part II - Metamorphoses of Byzantium after World War II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2022
- Rival Byzantiums
- Rival Byzantiums
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Note on the Text
- Additional material
- Introduction
- Part I On the Road to the Grand Narrative
- Part II Metamorphoses of Byzantium after World War II
- Chapter 6 From Helleno-Christian Civilisation to Roman Nation
- Chapter 7 Towards ‘Slavo-Byzantina’ and ‘Pax Symeonica’
- Chapter 8 How Byzantine Is Serbia?
- Chapter 9 Post-Byzantine Empire or Romanian National State?
- Chapter 10 In the Fold of the ‘Turkish-Islamic Synthesis’
- Epilogue and Conclusion
- References
- Index
Summary
This chapter focusses on the period of Ceaușescu’s ‘cultural revolution’ and its implications for historical scholarship. During the 1970s and 1980s a large-scale historiographical re-evaluation began, underpinned by nationalist exaltation, cultural megalomania and assertive autochthonism and supplemented by a retrieval of the big names of pre-war nationalist historiography and their works. Two topics dominated the debate on Byzantium: the actual contact of the Romanian countries with the empire and the transmission of its cultural legacy to the Romanians. The concept of ‘active reception’ of Byzantine culture established itself in cultural, art and architectural studies, testifying to the maturity of the receiving culture. The adaptation of the Byzantine institutional ‘model’ and political ideology, however, proved a more contentious and politicised matter.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rival ByzantiumsEmpire and Identity in Southeastern Europe, pp. 264 - 285Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022