Book contents
- Rival Byzantiums
- Rival Byzantiums
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Note on the Text
- Additional material
- Introduction
- Part I On the Road to the Grand Narrative
- Part II Metamorphoses of Byzantium after World War II
- Chapter 6 From Helleno-Christian Civilisation to Roman Nation
- Chapter 7 Towards ‘Slavo-Byzantina’ and ‘Pax Symeonica’
- Chapter 8 How Byzantine Is Serbia?
- Chapter 9 Post-Byzantine Empire or Romanian National State?
- Chapter 10 In the Fold of the ‘Turkish-Islamic Synthesis’
- Epilogue and Conclusion
- References
- Index
Chapter 8 - How Byzantine Is Serbia?
from Part II - Metamorphoses of Byzantium after World War II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2022
- Rival Byzantiums
- Rival Byzantiums
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Note on the Text
- Additional material
- Introduction
- Part I On the Road to the Grand Narrative
- Part II Metamorphoses of Byzantium after World War II
- Chapter 6 From Helleno-Christian Civilisation to Roman Nation
- Chapter 7 Towards ‘Slavo-Byzantina’ and ‘Pax Symeonica’
- Chapter 8 How Byzantine Is Serbia?
- Chapter 9 Post-Byzantine Empire or Romanian National State?
- Chapter 10 In the Fold of the ‘Turkish-Islamic Synthesis’
- Epilogue and Conclusion
- References
- Index
Summary
In communist Yugoslavia, research on Byzantium became institutionalised already in 1948 with the setting up of the Belgrade-based Institute of Byzantinology (Vizantološki institut) within the Serbian Academy of Sciences. Its thematic priorities, as before the war, were heavily tilted towards Byzantine-South Slav (especially Serbian) relations in the political, cultural and, increasingly now, socio-economic sphere. Compared to other branches of historiography and to the situation in Bulgaria and Romania, Yugoslav/Serbian medieval and Byzantine studies were less affected by doctrinaire Stalinism, while, already in the late 1940s, the communist leadership was encouraging Yugoslav historians to put Marxist historical theory to a more creative use. But if such a modicum of intellectual freedom helped sustain Byzantine research, its fecund development after the war owed everything to the Russian-born émigré byzantinist Georgiy Ostrogorski’s personal prestige and dedication to the growth of the ‘byzantinological’ field in Yugoslavia.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rival ByzantiumsEmpire and Identity in Southeastern Europe, pp. 242 - 263Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022