Abbott, Kenneth and Snidal, Duncan, 2009. The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State. In The Politics of Global Regulation, edited by Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire, 44–88. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel, 2008. The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO's PostCold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations 14 (2): 195–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds., 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Haas, Peter M., 1992. Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization 46 (1): 368–90.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, eds., 2011. International Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ainley, Kirsten, 2008. Responsibility in International Relations: A Social Practice Model. Available at: www.academia.edu/1553080/Responsibility_in_International_Relations_A_Social_Practice_Model.Google Scholar

Ainley, Kirsten, 2017. Virtue Ethics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies, Oxford University Press and the International Studies Association. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2928157.Google Scholar

Ainley, Kirsten, Friedman, Rebekka, and Mahoney, Chris, eds., 2015. Evaluating Transitional Justice: Accountability and Peacebuilding in Post–Conflict Sierra Leone. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Andresen, Steinar, 1993. The Effectiveness of the International Whaling Commission. Arctic 46 (2): 108–15.Google Scholar

Annan, Kofi, 2000. ‘We the Peoples’: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century. New York: United Nations Department of Public Information.Google Scholar

Annan, Kofi, 2005. In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All. New York: United Nations. Available at: http://csnu.itamaraty.gov.br/images/17._In_larger_freedom_Relatório_do_SGNU_Kofi_Annan.pdf.Google Scholar

Arbour, Jean-Maurice, 2014. La normativité du principe des responsabilités communes mais différenciées. Cahiers de droit 55 (1): 33–81.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, 1975 [1948]. The Origins of Totalitarianism, new Edition with added prefaces. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, 2003. Responsibility and Judgement. New York: Schoken Books.Google Scholar

Aristotle, , 2006. Nikomachische Ethik. Reinbeck: Rowohlt.Google Scholar

Atapattu, Sumudu, 2009. Climate Change, Equity and Differentiated Responsibilities: Does the Present Climate Regime Favor Developing Countries? Paper prepared for the Conference on Climate Law in Developing Countries Post-2012: North and South Perspectives organized by IUCN Law Academy, University of Ottawa, 26–28 September 2008, online: 1–23.Google Scholar

Auld, Graeme, Bernstein, Steven, and Cashore, Benjamin, 2008. The New Corporate Social Responsibility. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33 (1): 413–35.Google Scholar

Avant, Deborah, Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan, 2010. Who Governs the Globe? In Who Governs the Globe, edited by Avant, Deborah, Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan, 1–26, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sheree, Bailey and Channareth, Tun, 2008. Beyond Rhetoric: The Mine Ban Treaty and Victim Assistance. In Banning Landmines: Disarmament, Citizen Diplomacy, and Human Security, edited by Jody Williams, Stephen D. Goose, , and Wareham, Mary, 143–62. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael and Finnemore, Martha, 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond, 2005. Power in International Politics. International Organization 59 (1): 39–75.Google Scholar

Barral, Virginie, 2012. Sustainable Development in International Law: Nature and Operation of an Evolutive Legal Norm. European Journal of International Law 23 (2): 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barral, Virginie, 2015. Le développement durable en droit international. Essai sur les incidences juridiques d’une norme évolutive. Bruxelles: Bruylant.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens, 2015. Sovereignty and the Personality of the State. In The Concept of the State in International Relations: Philosophy, Sovereignty, and Cosmopolitanism, edited by Schuett, Robert and Stirk, Peter M. R., 81–107. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Bartenstein, Kristin, 2010. De Stockholm a Copenhague: genèse et évolution des responsabilités communes mais différenciées dans le droit international de l’environnement. McGill Law Journal 56 (1): 177–228.Google Scholar

Bartley, Tim, 2007. Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions. American Journal of Sociology 113 (2): 297–351.Google Scholar

Beardsworth, Richard J., 2015. From Moral to Political Responsibility in a Globalized Age. Ethics and International Affairs 29 (1): 71–92.Google Scholar

Becker, Jo and Shane, Scott, 2016. Hillary Clinton, ‘Smart Power’ and a Dictator’s Fall. The New York Times, 28 February 2016.Google Scholar

Bellal, Annyssa and Casey-Maslen, Stuart, 2011. Enhancing Compliance for International Law by Armed Non-State Actors. Göttingen Journal of International Law 3 (1): 175–97.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J., 2006. Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 2005 World Summit. Ethics & International Affairs 20 (2): 143–69.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J., 2010. The Responsibility to Protect and Australian Foreign Policy. Australian Journal of International Affairs 64 (4): 432–48.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. and Dunne, Tim, eds., 2016. The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennie, Lynn, Bernhagen, Patrick, and Mitchell, Neil J., 2007. The Logic of Transnational Action: The Good Corporation and the Global Compact. Political Studies 55 (4), 733–53.Google Scholar

Bernhagen, Patrick and Kollman, Kelly, 2013. Voluntary Business Codes: International Organizations and Enlisting Corporations for the Provision of Public Goods. In Routledge Handbook of International Organizations, edited by Reinalda, Bob, 417–29. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Steven, 2001. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Steven and Cashore, Benjamin, 2012. Complex Global Governance and Domestic Policies: Four Pathways of Influence. International Affairs 88 (3): 585–604.Google Scholar

Betsill, Michele M. and Corell, Elisabeth, eds., 2008. NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bevir, Mark and Rhodes, Roderick A. W., 2010. The State as Cultural Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bianculli, Andrea C., Jordana, Jacint, and Fernández-i-Marín, Xavier, eds., 2015. Accountability and Regulatory Governance: Audiences, Controls and Responsibilities in the Politics of Regulation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Biermann, Frank and Pattberg, Phillip, 2008. Global Environmental Governance: Taking Stock, Moving Forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33 (1): 277–94.Google Scholar

Biermann, Frank, Pattberg, Philipp, van Asselt, Harro, and Zelli, Fariborz, 2009. The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis. Global Environmental Politics 9 (4): 14–40.Google Scholar

Biersteker, Thomas and Weber, Cynthia, 1996. State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bird, Frederick, Twiss, Sumner B., Pedersen, Kusumita P., Miller, Clark A., and Grelle, Bruce, 2016. The Practice of Global Ethics: Historical Backgrounds, Current Issues and Future Prospects. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Birnie, Patricia, Boyle, Andrew, and Redgwell, Catherine, 2009. International Law and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Lincoln P., 2002. ‘Coalition of the Willing’ Is World's Best Weapon. The Baltimore Sun. Baltimore, 21 April 2002.Google Scholar

Boardman, Robert, 1981. International Organization and the Conservation of Nature. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodanski, Daniel, 2010. The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: A Post-Mortem. American Journal of International Law 104 (2): 1–10.Google Scholar

Boerzel, Tanja, 2001. Non-Compliance in the European Union: Pathology or Statistical Artefact? Journal of European Public Policy 8 (5): 803–24.Google Scholar

Bolton, Matthew and Nash, Thomas, 2010. The Role of Middle Power–NGO Coalitions in Global Policy: The Case of the Cluster Munitions Ban. Global Policy 1 (2): 172–84.Google Scholar

Boutros-Ghali, Boutros, 1992. An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-keeping. New York: United Nations – A/47/277.Google Scholar

Bower, Adam, 2020. Entrapping Gulliver: The United States and the Antipersonnel Mine Ban. Security Studies 29 (1): 128–161.Google Scholar

Bower, Andrew, 2015. Norms without the Great Powers: International Law, Nested Social Structures, and the Ban on Antipersonnel Mines. International Studies Review 17 (3): 347–73.Google Scholar

Bower, Andrew, 2017. Norms without the Great Powers: International Law and Changing Social Standards in World Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bowman, Andrew, Erturk, Ismail, Froud, Julie, Haslam, Colin, Johal, Sukhdev, Leaver, Adam, Moran, Michael, and Williams, Karel, 2015. What a Waste: Outsourcing and How It Goes Wrong. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Brammer, Stephen J. and Pavelin, Stephen, 2006. Corporate Reputation and Social Performance: The Importance of Fit. Journal of Management Studies 43 (3): 435–55.Google Scholar

Brandt, Willy, 1980. North-South: A Programme for Survival: Report of the Independent Commission on International Development Issues [‘Brandt Report’]. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Breakey, Hugh, 2015. Positive Duties and Human Rights: Challenges, Opportunities and Conceptual Necessities. Political Studies 63 (5): 1198–215.Google Scholar

Brenton, Tony, 1994. The Greening of Machiavelli: The Evolution of International Environmental Politics. London: Earthscan/RIIA.Google Scholar

Brown, Chris, 2003. Moral Agency and International Society: Reflections on Norms, the UN, the Gulf War, and the Kosovo Campaign. In Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations, edited by Erskine, Toni, 51–65. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Brown, Chris, 2004. Do Great Powers Have Great Responsibilities? Great Powers and Moral Agency. Global Society 18 (1): 5–19.Google Scholar

Brown, Chris, 2012. The ‘Practice Turn’, Phronesis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory? Millennium – Journal of International Relations 40 (3): 439–56.Google Scholar

Brown, Dana L., Vetterlein, Antje, and Roemer-Mahler, Anne, 2010. Theorizing Transnational Corporations as Social Actors: An Analysis of Corporate Motivations. Business and Politics 12 (1): 1–37.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, 2011. An Agreement in Principle? The Copenhagen Accord and the Post–2012 Climate Regime. In Law of the Sea in Dialog, edited by Hestermeyer, Holger, Matz-Lück, Nele, Seibert-Fohr, Anja, and Vöneky, Silja, 47–72. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta and Toope, Stephen J., 2005, Norms, Institutions and UN Reform: The Responsibility to Protect. Journal of International Law & International Relations 2 (1): 121–37.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta and Toope, Stephen J., 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bukovansky, Mlada, Eckersley, Robyn, Price, Richard, Reus-Smit, Christian, and Wheeler, Nicholas J., 2012. Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley, 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Busby, Joshua and Hadden, Jennifer, 2014. Nonstate Actors in the Climate Arena. Working Paper of the Stanley Foundation. Available at: www.stanleyfoundation.org/publications/working_papers/StanleyNonState_BusbyHadden.pdf.Google Scholar

Bushey, Douglas and Jinnah, Sikina, 2010. Evolving Responsibility? The Principle of Common but Differenciated Responsibility in the UNFCCC. Berkeley Journal of International Law Publicist 28 (6): 1–10.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry, 2004. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caldwell, Lynton K., 1996. International Environmental Policy: Emergence and Dimensions. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Cane, Peter, 2002. Responsibility in Law and Morality. Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Caney, Simon, 2014. Two Kinds of Climate Justice. Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (3): 125–49.Google Scholar

Carpenter, R. Charli, 2011. Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms. International Organization 65 (1): 69–102.Google Scholar

Carroll, Archie B., 1999. Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business and Society 38 (3): 268–95.Google Scholar

Chandler, David, 2002. From Kosovo to Kabul: Human Rights and International Intervention. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Chandler, David, 2004. The Responsibility to Protect? Imposing the ‘Liberal Peace’. International Peacekeeping 11 (1): 59–81.Google Scholar

Chandler, David, 2008. Human Security: The Dog That Didn’t Bark. Security Dialogue 39 (4): 427–38.Google Scholar

Childers, Erskine and Urquhart, Brian, 1994. Renewing the United Nations System. Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.Google Scholar

Christiansen, Thomas and Neubold, Christine, eds., 2012a. International Handbook on Informal Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christiansen, Thomas and Neuhold, Christine, 2012b. Introduction. In International Handbook on Informal Governance, edited by Christiansen, Thomas and Neuhold, Christine, 1–15. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Cioffi, John W., 2010. Public Law and Private Power: Corporate Governance Reform in the Age of Financial Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Clapham, Andrew, 2014. Focusing on Armed Non-State Actors. In The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict, edited by Clapham, Andrew and Gaeta, Paola, 766–810. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian, 2007. International Legitimacy and World Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian and Reus-Smit, Christian, 2013. Liberal Internationalism, the Practice of Special Responsibilities and Evolving Politics of the Security Council. International Politics 50 (1): 38–56.Google Scholar

Claude, Inis L., 1966. Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations. International Organization 20 (3): 367–79.Google Scholar

Clinton, William J., 1997. Remarks by the President on Land Mines. Office of the White House Press Secretary, The Roosevelt Room, White House, Washington, DC. Available at: www.fas.org/asmp/resources/govern/withdrawal91797.html.Google Scholar

Clunan, Anne L. and Trinkunas, Harold A., eds., 2010. Ungoverned Spaces – Alternatives to State Authority in an Age of Softened Sovereignty. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, Katharina P., 2013. Minerva’s Allies: States, Secretariats, and Individuals in the Emergence of the Responsibility to Protect Norm. In Leadership in Global Institution Building: Minerva’s Rule, edited by Tiberghien, Yves, 150–69. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Commission on Global Governance, 1995. Our Global Neighborhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, 1973. Available at: www.cites.org.Google Scholar

Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, 1979. Available at: www.unece.org/env/lrtap/welcome.html.Google Scholar

Compliance Committee of the Kyoto Protocol. Decision VII/18, Doc. UN UNEP/OzL.Pro.7/12: 1995.Google Scholar

Conceição-Heldt, Eugenia, 2018. Lost in Internal Evaluation: Accountability and Insulation at the World Bank. Contemporary Politics 24(5): 568–87.Google Scholar

Conzelmann, Thomas, 2012. Informal Governance in International Relations. In International Handbook on Informal Governance, edited by Christiansen, Thomas and Neuhold, Christine, 219–35. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Cooper, Andrew F., 2005. Stretching the Model of ‘Coalitions of the Willing’. Centre for International Governance and Innovation. Working Paper No. 1: October. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=857444.Google Scholar

Corell, Elisabeth and Betsill, Michele M., 2001. A Comparative Look and NGO Influence in International Environmental Negotiations: Desertification and Climate Change. Global Environmental Politics 1 (4): 86–107.Google Scholar

Coupland, Richard and Loye, Dominic, 2003. The 1899 Hague Declaration concerning Expanding Bullets: A Treaty Effective for More Than 100 Years Faces Complex Contemporary Issues. International Review of the Red Cross 85 (849): 135–142.Google Scholar

Cowley, Peter, 2014. Moral Responsibility. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Crawford, Neta C., 2013. Accountability for Killing: Moral Responsibility for Collateral Damage in America’s Post-9/11 Wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crouch, Colin, 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Cullet, Philippe, 2010. Common but Differentiated Responsibilities. In Research Handbook on International Environmental Law, edited by Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Ong, David, and Merkouris, Panos, 161–81. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Cullet, Philippe, 2015. Principle 7: Common but Differentiated Responsibilities. In The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary, edited by Viñuales, Jorge, 229–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cutler, Claire, Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Thomas, 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. In Private Authority and International Affairs, edited by Cutler, Claire, Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Thomas, 3–30. Albany: State of New York University Press.Google Scholar

Daase, Christopher, Junk, Julian, Kroll, Stefan, and Rauer, Valentin, eds., 2017. Politik und Verantwortung. Analysen zum Wandel politischer Entscheidungs- und Rechtfertigungspraktiken. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, special issue.Google Scholar

Darnall, Nicole, Henriques, Irene, and Sadorsky, Perry, 2010. Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size. Journal of Management Studies 47 (6): 1072–94.Google Scholar

Dashwood, Hevina S., 2012. The Rise of Global Corporate Social Responsibility: Mining and the Spread of Global Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dashwood, Hevina S. and Puplampu, Bill Buenar, 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility and Canadian Mining Companies in the Developing World: The Role of Organizational Leadership and Learning. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 30 (1–2): 175–96.Google Scholar

Davies, Thomas R., 2013. NGOs: A New History of Transnational Civil Society. London: Hurst.Google Scholar

de Carvalho, Benjamin and Lie, Jon Harald Sande, 2011. Chronicle of a Frustration Foretold? The Implementation of a Broad Protection Agenda in the United Nations. Journal of International Peacekeeping 15 (3–4): 341–62.Google Scholar

de Carvalho, Benjamin and Schia, Niels Nagelhus, 2004. UN Reform and Collective Security: An Overview of Post-Cold War Initiatives and Proposals. Oslo: NUPI. Available at: https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2396460/NUPIpaperUNReform.pdf?sequence=3.Google Scholar

de Carvalho, Benjamin and Schia, Niels Nagelhus, 2009. Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in Liberia and the Case for a Comprehensive Approach to the Rule of Law. Journal of International Relations and Development 14 (1): 134–41.Google Scholar

de Carvalho, Benjamin and Sending, Ole Jacob, eds., 2013. The Protection of Civilians in UN Peacekeeping: Concept, Implementation and Practice. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

de Waal, Alex, 2007. Darfur and the Failure of the Responsibility to Protect. International Affairs 83 (6): 1039–54.Google Scholar

Deakin, Simon, 2012. The Corporation as Commons: Rethinking Property Rights, Governance and Sustainability in the Business Enterprise. Queen’s Law Journal 37 (2): 339–81.Google Scholar

Deegan, Craig, 2002. Introduction: The Legitimising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures – A Theoretical Foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15(3): 282–311.Google Scholar

Deleuil, Thomas, 2012. The Common but Differentiated Responsibilities Principle: Changes in Continuity after the Durban Conference of the Parties. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 21 (3): 271–81.Google Scholar

Deng, Francis Mading, Kimaro, Sadikiel, Lyons, Terrence, Rothchild, Donald, and Zartman, I. William, 1996. Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Department of State, United States of America, 2004a. Fact Sheet: Landmine Policy White Paper. Washington, DC: Bureau of Political-Military Affairs. Available at: www.fas.org/asmp/campaigns/landmines/FactSheet_LandminePolicyWhitePaper_2-27-04.htm.Google Scholar

Department of State, United States of America, 2004b. On-the-Record Briefing by Lincoln P. Bloomfield, Jr., Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs. Washington, DC. Available at: http://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ei/speeches/2004.Google Scholar

DeSombre, Elizabeth R., 2010. The United States and Global Environmental Politics: Domestic Sources of U.S. Unilateralism. In The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy, edited by Axelrod, Regina S., VanDeveer, Stacy D., and Downie, David L., 192–212. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Dingwerth, Klaus and Pattberg, Phillip, 2009. World Politics and Organisational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance. European Journal of International Relations 15 (4): 707–43.Google Scholar

Yoram, Dinstein, 2010. The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Djelic, Marie Laur and Etchanchu, Helen, 2015. Contextualizing Corporate Political Responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in Historical Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 142 (4): 1–21.Google Scholar

Doh, Jonathan P., 2005. Offshore Outsourcing: Implications for International Business and Strategic Management Theory and Practice. Journal of Management Studies 42 (3): 695–704.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Thomas and Preston, Lee E., 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporations: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–91.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack, 2006. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Driver, C. and Thompson, G. F., eds., 2017. The Future of Corporate Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Driver, C. and Thompson, G. F., eds., 2018. Corporate Governance in Contention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dunne, Tim and Wheeler, Nicholas J., 1999. Human Rights in Global Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eckersley, Robyn, 2015. The Common but Differentiated Responsibilities of States to Assist and Receive ‘Climate Refugees’. European Journal of Political Theory 14 (4): 481–500.Google Scholar

Elshtain, Jean Bethke, 2003. International Justice as Equal Regard and the Use of Force. Ethics and International Affairs 17 (2): 63–75.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni, 2001. Assigning Responsibilities to Institutional Moral Agents: The Case of States and Quasi-States. Ethics & International Affairs 15 (2): 67–85.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni, 2003. Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni, 2003. Introduction: Making Sense of ‘Responsibility’ in International Relations – Key Questions and Concepts. In Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations, edited by Erskine, Toni, 1–16. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni, 2004. ‘Blood on the UN’s Hands’? Assigning Duties and Apportioning Blame to an Intergovernmental Organizations. Global Society 18 (1): 21–42.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni, 2008. Locating Responsibility: The Problem of Moral Agency in International Relations. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan, 699–707. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni, 2014. Coalitions of the Willing and Responsibilities to Protect: Informal Associations, Enhanced Capacities, and Shared Moral Burdens. Ethics & International Affairs 28 (1): 115–45.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni, 2015. Coalitions of the Willing and the Shared Responsibility to Protect. In Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law, edited by Nollkaemper, André and Jacobs, Dov, 227–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni, 2016. Moral Agents of Protection and Supplementary Responsibilities to Protect. In The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, edited by Bellamy, Alex J. and Dunne, Tim, 167–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

European Commission, 2011. European Commission Strategy on CSR. Brussels: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/corporate-social-responsibility_en.Google Scholar

European Communities – Conditions for the Granting of tariff Preferences to Developing Countries, AB Report, WTO Doc WT/DS246/AB/R, 2004.Google Scholar

Union, European, 2017. Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council (17 May 2017). Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2017.130.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2017:130:TOC.Google Scholar

Evans, Gareth J., 1993. Cooperating for Peace: The Global Agenda for the 1990s and Beyond. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Evans, Gareth J., 2006. From Humanitarian Intervention to the Responsibility to Protect. Wisconsin International Law Journal 24 (3): 703–22.Google Scholar

Evans, Gareth J., 2008a. The Responsibility to Protect: An Idea Whose Time Has Come … and Gone? International Relations 22 (3): 283–98.Google Scholar

Evans, Gareth J., 2008b. The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Fain, Haskell, 1987. Normative Politics and the Community of Nations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Falkner, Robert, 2008. Business Power and Conflict in International Environmental Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Falkner, Robert, 2012. Global Environmentalism and the Greening of International Society. International Affairs 88 (3): 503–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falkner, Robert, 2019. The Unavoidability of Justice – and Order – in International Climate Politics: From Kyoto to Paris and Beyond. In: British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21 (2): 270–278.Google Scholar

Falkner, Robert and Buzan, Barry, 2019. The Emergence of Environmental Stewardship as a Primary Institution of Global International Society. European Journal of International Relations 25 (1). 131–55.Google Scholar

Favotto, Alvise, Kollman, Kelly, and Bernhagen, Patrick, 2016. Engaging Firms: The Global Organizational Field for Corporate Social Responsibility and National Varieties of Capitalism. Policy and Society 35 (1): 13–27.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.Google Scholar

Flippen, J. Brooks, 2008. Richard Nixon, Russell Train, and the Birth of Modern American Environmental Diplomacy. Diplomatic History 32 (4): 613–38.Google Scholar

Flohr, Annegret, Rieth, Lothar, Schwindenhammer, Sandra, and Wolf, Klaus Dieter, 2010. The Role of Business in Global Governance: Corporations as Norm-Entrepreneurs. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, Bent, 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Foot, Philippa, 1967. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Oxford Review 5 (1): 5–15.Google Scholar

Freeden, Michael, 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

French, Duncan, 2000. Developing States and International Environmental Law: The Importance of Differentiated Responsibilities. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49 (1): 35–60.Google Scholar

French, Peter A., 1979. The Corporation as a Moral Person. American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3): 207–15.Google Scholar

French, Peter A., 1984. Collective and Corporate Responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael, 1970. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times, September 13.Google Scholar

Frost, Mervin, 2004. Can Dispersed Practices Be Held Ethically Accountable? Global Society 18 (1): 77–91.Google Scholar

Frost, Mervin, 2003. Constitutive Theory and Moral Accountability: Individuals, Institutions and Dispersed Practices. In Can Institutions Have Responsibilities?, edited by Erskine, Toni, 84–99. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gard, Robert G. Jr., 1998. The Military Utility of Anti-Personnel Landmines. In To Walk Without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W., 136–57. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Garriga, Elisabet and Mele, Domenec, 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. In Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context, edited by Crane, Andrew, Matten, Dirk, and Spence, Laura J., 76–106. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Garwood-Gowers, Andrew, 2012. China and the ‘Responsibility to Protect’: The Implications of the Libyan Intervention. Asian Journal of International Law 2 (2): 375–93.Google Scholar

Gaskarth, Jamie, ed., 2015. Rising Powers, Global Governance and Global Ethics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gaskarth, Jamie, 2017. Rising Powers, Responsibility, and International Society. Ethics and International Affairs 31 (3): 287–311.Google Scholar

Geis, Anna, Müller, Harald, and Schornig, Niklas, 2010. Liberale Demokratien und Krieg: Warum manche kämpfen und andere nicht. Ergebnisse einer vergleichenden Inhaltsanalyse von Parlamentsdebatten. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 17 (2): 171–201.Google Scholar

Call, Geneva, 2014. Annual Report 2013: Protecting Civilians in Armed Conflict. Geneva: Geneva Call. Available at: www.genevacall.org/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2014/06/2013-GenevaCall-Annual-Report.pdf.Google Scholar

Georges Pinson (France) v. United Mexican States, ICJ, Rec., 1928.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan, 2015. ‘To Prevent Future Kosovos and Future Rwandas’: A Critical Constructivist View of the Responsibility to Protect. The International Journal of Human Rights 19 (8): 1074–97.Google Scholar

Glanville, Luke, 2014. Sovereignty & the Responsibility to Protect: A New History. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Gobert, James and Punch, Maurice, 2003. Rethinking Corporate Crime. London: Butterworths/LexisNexis.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E., 1992. Green Political Theory. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Goose, Stephen D., Wareham, Mary, and Williams, Jody, 2008. Banning Landmines and Beyond. In Banning Landmines: Disarmament, Citizen Diplomacy, and Human Security, edited by Williams, Jody, Goose, Stephen D., and Wareham, Mary, 1–14. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Gordon, Jessica, 2007. Inter American Commission in Human Rights to Hold Hearing after Rejecting Inuit Climate Change Petition. Sustainable Development Law and Policy 7 (2): 55.Google Scholar

Grande, Edgar, 1996. The State and Interest Groups in a Framework of Multi-Level Decision-Making: The Case of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 3 (3): 318–38.Google Scholar

Grant, Ruth W. and Keohane, Robert O., 2005. Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. American Political Science Review 99 (1): 29–43.Google Scholar

Guha, Ramachandra, 2000. Environmentalism: A Global History. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haas, Peter M., 1989. Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control. International Organization 43 (3): 377–403.Google Scholar

Haflidadottir, Helga and Lang, Anthony F. Jr, 2019. Climate Change and Cosmopolitan Responsibilities. In The State and Cosmopolitan Responsibilities, edited by Beardsworth, Richard, Brown, Garrett Wallace, and Shapcott, Richard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hafner-Burton, Emilie Marie, Victo, David G., and Lupu, Yonatan, 2012. Political Science Research on International Law: The State of the Field. The American Journal of International Law 106 (1): 47–97.Google Scholar

Hahn, Rüdiger and Weidtmann, Christian, 2016. Transnational Governance, Deliberative Democracy, and the Legitimacy of ISO 26000: Analyzing the Case of a Global Multistakeholder Process. Business and Society 55 (1): 90–129.Google Scholar

Hale, Thomas, 2011. A Climate Change Coalition of the Willing. The Washington Quarterly 34 (1): 89–101.Google Scholar

Hale, Thomas and Held, David, eds., 2011. Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David W., 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Rodney Bruce and Biersteker, Thomas J., eds., 2002. The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hamati-Ataya, Inanna, 2011. The ‘Problem of Values’ and International Relations Scholarship: From Applied Reflexivity to Reflexivism. International Studies Review 13 (2): 259–87.Google Scholar

Hannay, David, 2008. New World Disorder: The UN after the Cold War – An Insider’s View. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes, 2014. International Relations as Politics among People: Towards a Hermeneutic Approach to Global Governance. Hamburg, PhD Dissertation, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar

Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes, Vetterlein, Antje, and Wiener, Antje, 2018. The Problem of Non-Compliance: Knowledge Gaps and Moments of Contestation in Global Governance. Journal of International Relations and Development.Google Scholar

Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus and Gardner, John, 2008. Punishment and Responsibility – Essays in the Philosophy of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haufler, Virginia, 2001. A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar

Hayden, Patrick, 2007. Superfluous Humanity: An Arendtian Perspective on the Political Evil of Global Poverty. Millennium – Journal of International Relations 35 (2): 279–300.Google Scholar

Hayden, Patrick, 2012. The Human Right to Health and the Struggle for Recognition. Review of International Studies 38 (3): 569–88.Google Scholar

Hayden, Patrick, 2014. Systematic Evil and the International Political Imagination. International Politics 51 (4): 424–40.Google Scholar

Heidbrink, Ludger, 2010. Die Rolle des Verantwortungsbegriffs in der Wirtschaftsethik (Working Papers des CRR, No 9). Available at: www.responsibility-research.de/resources/WP_9_Verantwortungsbegriff_in_der_Wirtschaftsethik.pdf.Google Scholar

Heinze, Eric A. and Steele, Brent J., 2013. The (D)evolution of a Norm: R2P, the Bosnia Generation and Humanitarian Intervention in Libya. In Libya, the Responsibility to Protect and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention, edited by Hehir, Aidan and Murray, Robert, 130–61. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Held, David and McGrew, Anthony, Goldblatt, David, and Perraton, Jonathan, 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Held, Virginia, 1970. Can a Random Collection of Individuals Be Morally Responsible? The Journal of Philosophy 67 (14): 471–81.Google Scholar

Hellio, Hugues, 2014. Le principe des responsabilités communes mais différenciées et le contrôle du non-respect: une rencontre fantasmée. Les Cahiers de Droit 55 (1): 193–220.Google Scholar

High Level Panel, 2004. A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility (Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change). New York: United Nations, Available at: www.un.org/en/peacebuilding/pdf/historical/hlp_more_secure_world.pdf.Google Scholar

Hilson, Chris, 2007. Legitimacy and Rights in the EU: Questions of Identity. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (4): 527–43.Google Scholar

Hironaka, Ann, 2014. Greening the Globe: World Society and Environmental Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hirst, Paul, 1994. Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Societal Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Adam, 2005. Bury the Chains: Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an Empire’s Slaves. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Hofferberth, Matthias, ed., 2019. Corporate Actors in Global Governance: Business as Usual or New Deal? London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Matthew, 2011. Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Holdgate, Martin, 1999. The Green Web: A Union for World Conservation. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Honkonen, Tuula, 2009. The Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility in Post-2012 Climate Negotiations. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 18 (3): 257–67.Google Scholar

Honoré, Tony, 1999. Responsibility and Fault. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Hoover, Jonathan, 2012. Reconstructing Responsibility and Moral Agency in World Politics. International Theory 4 (2): 233–68.Google Scholar

Hopgood, Stephen, 1998. American Foreign Environmental Policy and the Power of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Michael, 2016. CSR and Sustainability: From the Margins to the Mainstream. London: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar

Council, Human Rights, 2009. Report of the OHCHR on the Relationship between Climate Change and Human Rights, A/HRC/10/61. Available at: www.ohchr.org/Documents/Press/AnalyticalStudy.pdf.Google Scholar

Human Rights Council Resolution 7/23, 2008. Human Rights and Climate Change. Available at: www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/climatechange/docs/Resolution_7_23.pdf.Google Scholar

Human Rights Council Resolution 29/15, 2015. Human Rights and Climate Change, A/HRC/29/L.21. Available at: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G15/137/48/PDF/G1513748.pdf?OpenElement.Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, 2004. Human Rights Watch Position Paper on ‘Smart’ (Self-Destructing) Landmines. New York: Human Rights Watch. Available at: www.hrw.org/reports/2004/02/27/human-rights-watch-position-paper-smart-self-destructing-landmines.Google Scholar

Humphreys, Stephen, 2009. Introduction: Human Rights and Climate Change. In Human Rights and Climate Change, edited by Humphreys, Stephen, 1–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew and Sengupta, Sandeep, 2012. Emerging Powers, North-South Relations and Global Climate Politics. International Affairs 88 (3): 463–84.Google Scholar

Idemudia, Uwafiokun, 2007. Community Perceptions and Expectations: Reinventing the Wheels of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in the Nigerian Oil Industry. Business and Society Review 112 (3): 369–405.Google Scholar

India – Quantitative Restrictions on Imports of Agricultural, Textile and Industrial Products, Panel Report, WTO Doc WT/DS90/R, 2001.Google Scholar

International Campaign to Ban Landmines, 1999. Landmine Monitor 1999. New York: Human Rights Watch. Available at: www.the-monitor.org/index.php/publications/display?act=submit&pqs_year=1999&pqs_type=lm&pqs_report=&pqs_section.Google Scholar

International Campaign to Ban Landmines, 2013. Landmine Monitor 2013. United States Country Report. Geneva: ICBL. Available at: http://www.the-monitor.org/index.php/cp/display/region_profiles/theme/3141.Google Scholar

International Campaign to Ban Landmines, 2014. Landmine Monitor 2014. Geneva: ICBL-CMC. Available at: http://the-monitor.org/index.php/LM/Our-Research-Products/Landmine-Monitor/LMM2014/LandmineMonitor2014.Google Scholar

International Campaign to Ban Landmines, 2018. Landmine Monitor 2018. Geneva: ICBL-CMC. Available at: www.the-monitor.org/media/2918780/Landmine-Monitor-2018_final.pdf.Google Scholar

International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS), 2001. ‘The Responsibility to Protect’. Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Available at: http://www.iciss.ca/report-en.asp.Google Scholar

International Committee of the Red Cross, 1992. Mines: A Perverse Use of Technology. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar

International Committee of the Red Cross, 1997. Anti-personnel Landmines. In Friend or Foe? Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar

International Committee of the Red Cross, 2010. ICRC statement to the United Nations. New York. Available at: www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/statement/united-nations-weapons-statement-2010-10-12.htm.Google Scholar

International Finance Corporation (IFC), 2011. Performance Standards on Social and Environmental Sustainability (IFC), http://www.ifc.org.Google Scholar

International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2010. ISO 26000:2010. Available at: www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html.Google Scholar

Ireland, Paddy, 1999. Company Law and the Myth of Shareholder Ownership. Modern Law Review 62 (1): 32–57.Google Scholar

Ireland, Paddy, 2016. The Corporation and the New Aristocracy of Finance. In Multinationals and the Constitutionalization of the World Power System, edited by Robé, Jean-Philippe, Lyon-Caen, Antoine, and Vernac, Stéphane, 53–98. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ireland, Paddy, 2018. Corporate Schizophrenia: The Institutional Origins of Corporate Social Irresponsibility. In: Shaping the Corporate Landscape, edited by Boeger, Nina and Villiers, Charlotte. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Isin, Engin and Nielsen, Greg M., 2008. Acts of Citizenship. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Jackson, Gregory and Apostolakou, Androniki, 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Europe: An Institutional Mirror or Substitute? Journal of Business Ethics 94 (3): 371–94.Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert, 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jensen, Michael C. and Meckling, William H., 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–60.Google Scholar

Jepperson, Ronald L., Wendt, Alexander, and Katzenstein, Peter J., 1996. Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security. In The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., 33–75. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Jo, Hyeran, 2015. Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Paul, 2010. Making the Market: Victorian Origins of Corporate Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rebecca, Johnson, 2013. Arms Control and Disarmament Diplomacy. In The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, edited by Cooper, Andrew F., Heine, Jorge, and Thakur, Ramesh, 593–609. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jonas, Hans, 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kang, Kyung-wha, 2007. Climate Change and Human Rights. Conference of the Parties to the United Nation Framework Convention on Climate and its Kyoto Protocol. Bali, Indonesia, 3–14 December. Available at: www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=200&LangID=E.Google Scholar

Karp, David Jason, 2014. Responsibility for Human Rights: Transnational Corporations in Imperfect States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Karp, David Jason, 2015. The Responsibility to Protect Human Rights and the RtoP: Prospective and Retrospective Responsibility. Global Responsibility to Protect 7(2): 142–66.Google Scholar

Kaspersen, Anja T. and Leira, Halvard, 2006. A Fork in the Road or a Roundabout: A Narrative of the UN Reform Process 2003–2005. Oslo: Norwegian Insitute of International Affairs.Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn, 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert and Victor, David G., 2011. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 7–23.Google Scholar

Kerry, John, 2013. Getting the US-China Climate Partnership Right. US Department of State. Available at: www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2013/07/212219.htm.Google Scholar

Kinderman, Daniel, 2012. ‘Free Us Up So We Can Be Responsible!’ The Co-evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977–2010. Socio-Economic Review 10 (1): 29–57.Google Scholar

Kinderman, Daniel, 2015. Explaining the Rise of National Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Global Frameworks, World Culture, and Corporate Interests. In Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World, edited by Tsutsui, Kiyoteru and Lim, Alwyn, 107–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, 2006. The Meaning of Rules. International Relations 20 (3): 295–301.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, 2013. International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Knudsen, Jette Steen, 2011. Company Delistings from the UN Global Compact: Limited Business Demand or Domestic Governance Failure? Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3): 331–49.Google Scholar

Kobrin, Stephen J., 2009. Private Political Authority and Public Responsibility: Transnational Politics, Trans-National Firms, and Human Rights. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (3): 349–74.Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, 2013. The Main Epochs of Modern International Humanitarian Law since 1864 and Their Related Dominant Legal Constructions. In Searching for a ‘Principle of Humanity’ in International Humanitarian Law, edited by Larsen, Kjetil Mujezinovic, Cooper, Camilla Guldahl, and Nystuen, Gro, 23–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kolk, Ans, 2004. A Decade of Sustainability Reporting: Developments and Significance. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 3 (1): 51–64.Google Scholar

Kolleck, Nina, Well, Mareike, Sperzel, Severin, and Jorgens, Helge, 2017. The Power of Social Networks: How the UNFCCC Secretariat Creates Momentum for Climate Education. Global Environmental Politics 17 (4): 106–26.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Matti, 2002. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kreps, Sarah E., 2011. Coalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions after the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kutz, Christopher, 2000. Acting Together. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1): 1–31.Google Scholar

Kuyper, Jonathan W. and Backstrand, Karin, 2016. Accountability and Representation: Nonstate Actors in UN Climate Diplomacy. Global Environmental Politics 16 (2): 61–81.Google Scholar

Lampert, Matthew, 2016. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Supposed Moral Agency of Corporations. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 16 (1): 79–105.Google Scholar

Lang, Anthony F. Jr, 1999. Responsibility in the International System: Reading US Foreign Policy in the Middle East. European Journal of International Relations 5 (1): 67–107.Google Scholar

Lazonick, William, 2014. Profit without Prosperity. Harvard Business Review 92 (9): 46–55.Google Scholar

Leake, Jonathan and Webster, Ben, 2010. No Hope for Climate Change. The Australian. Sydney, 29 November 2010.Google Scholar

Lebow, Richard Ned, 2003. The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interest and Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levi-Faur, David, 2011). Regulatory Networks and Regulatory Agencification: Towards a Single European Regulatory Space. Journal of European Public Policy 18 (6): 810–29.Google Scholar

Lewis, Patricia, 2013. Syria: Chemical Weapons and the Spectre of War. Chatham House. The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 27 August: www.chathamhouse.org/media/comment/view/194007.Google Scholar

Lie, Jon Harald Sande and de Carvalho, Benjamin, 2008. A Culture of Protection? Perceptions of the Protection of Civilians from Sudan. Oslo: NUPI.Google Scholar

Lie, Jon Harald Sande and de Carvalho, Benjamin, 2010. Between Culture and Concept: The Protection of Civilians in Sudan (UNMIS). Journal of International Peacekeeping 14 (1–2): 60–85.Google Scholar

Lie, Jon Harald Sande and de Carvalho, Benjamin, 2011. Beskyttelse av sivile (PoC) og Ansvar for å beskytte (R2P): Konseptuelle og historiske betraktninger. Internasjonal Politikk 69 (1): 108–16.Google Scholar

Liese, Andrea, 2009. Exceptional Necessity: How Liberal Democracies Contest the Prohibition of Torture and Ill-Treatment When Countering Terrorism. Journal of International Law and International Relations 5 (1): 17–48.Google Scholar

Linklater, Andrew, 2006. Cosmopolitanism. In Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge, edited by Dobson, Andrew and Eckersley, Robyn, 109–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Loconto, Allison and Fouilleux, Eve, 2014. Politics of Private Regulation: ISEAL and the Shaping of the Shaping of Transnational Sustainability Governance. Regulation and Governance 8 (2): 166–85.Google Scholar

Logsdon, Jeanne M. and Wood, Donna J., 2002. Reputation as an Emerging Construct in the Business and Society Field. Business and Society 41 (4): 365–70.Google Scholar

Logsdon, Jeanne M. and Wood, Donna J., 2005. Global Business Citizenship and Voluntary Codes of Ethical Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics 59 (1–2), 55–67.Google Scholar

Loke, Beverly, 2016. Unpacking the Politics of Great Power Responsibility: Nationalist and Maoist China in International Order-Building. European Journal of International Relations 22 (4): 847–71.Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan, 1989. The Role of Equity in International Law. Australian Yearbook of International Law 12 (1): 54–81.Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan, 1999. Sustainable Development and Unsustainable Arguments. In International Law and Sustainable Development. Past Achievements and Future Challenges, edited by Boyle, Alan and Freestone, David, 19–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Luck, Edward C., 2010. The Responsibility to Protect: Growing Pains or Early Promise? Ethics and International Affairs 24 (2): 349–65.Google Scholar

Luck, Edward C., 2011. The Responsibility to Protect: The First Decade. Global Responsibility to Protect 3 (4): 387–99.Google Scholar

Macekura, Stephen, 2011. The Limits of the Global Community: The Nixon Administration and Global Environmental Politics. Cold War History 11 (4): 489–518.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair, 2004. After Virtue. London: Duckworth Publishers.Google Scholar

MacLeod, Michael and Park, Jacob, 2011. Financial Activism and Global Climate Change: The Rise of Investor-Driven Governance Networks. Global Environmental Politics 11 (2): 54–74.Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico, 2006. The Common Sense of European Integration. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (5): 607–26.Google Scholar

Magraw, D. Barstow, 1990. Legal Treatment of Developing Countries: Differential, Contextual, and Absolute Norms. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 1 (1): 69–82.Google Scholar

Maguire, Rowena, 2013. The Role of Common but Differentiated Responsibility in the 2020 Climate Regime: Evolving an Understanding of Differential Commitments. Carbon and Climate Law Review 7 (4): 260–69.Google Scholar

Maitland, Frederic William, 2003. State, Trust and Corporation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maljean-Dubois, Sandrine, 2016. The Paris Agreement: A New Step in the Gradual Evolution of Differential Treatment in the Climate Regime? Review of European Comparative and International Environmental Law 25 (2): 151–60.Google Scholar

Mansell, Samuel, 2013. Capitalism, Corporations and the Social Contract: A Critique of Stakeholder Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Stuart, Maslen, 2005. Commentaries on Arms Control Treaties: The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mathews, Robert J. and McCormack, Timothy L. H., 1999. The Influence of Humanitarian Principles in the Negotiation of Arms Control Treaties. International Review of the Red Cross 834. Available at: www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/57jpty.htm.Google Scholar

Matsui, Yoshiro, 2002. Some Aspects of the Principle of ‘Common but Differentiated Responsibilities’. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2 (2): 151–71.Google Scholar

Matten, Dirk and Moon, Jeremy, 2008. ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review 33 (2): 404–24.Google Scholar

Matten, Dirk, Crane, Andrew, and Chapple, Wendy, 2003. Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics 45 (1–2), 109–20.Google Scholar

May, Larry, 1987. The Morality of Groups: Collective Responsibility, Group-Based Harm, and Corporate Rights. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

May, Larry, 1992. Sharing Responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mazower, Mark, 2012. Governing the World: The History of an Idea. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

McCain, John, 2012. Transcript of Piers Morgan Tonight: Interview with John McCain. CNN, 19 July 2012, http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1207/19/pmt.01.html.Google Scholar

McAdam, Doug, 2017. Social Movement Theory and the Prospects for Climate Change Activism in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science 20 (1): 189–208.Google Scholar

McCormick, John, 1989. Reclaiming Paradise: The Global Environmental Movement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Michel, Torsten, 2013. Time to Get Emotional: Phronetic Reflections on the Concept of Trust in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 19 (4): 869–90.Google Scholar

Mickelson, Karin, 2009. Competing Narratives of Justice in North-South Environmental Relations: The Case of Ozone Layer Depletion. In Environmental Law and Justice in Context, edited by Ebbesson, Jonas and Okowa, Phoebe, 297–315. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, David, 2001. Distributing Responsibilities. Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (4): 453–71.Google Scholar

Miller, David, 2004. Holding Nations Responsible. Ethics 114 (2): 240–68.Google Scholar

Miller, David, 2007. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Milliken, Jennifer, 1999. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 225–54.Google Scholar

Mills, Kurt and Karp, David Jason, eds., 2015. Human Rights Protection in Global Politics: Responsibilities of States and Non-State Actors. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Ronald B., 1994. Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance. International Organization 48 (3): 425–58.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Ronald B., 1998. Forms of Discourse, Norms of Sovereignty: Interests, Science, and Morality in the Regulation of Whaling. In The Greening of Sovereignty in World Politics, edited by Litfin, Karen T., 141–71. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mohamed, Saira, 2012. Taking Stock of the Responsibility to Protect. Stanford Journal of International Law 48 (2): 319–39.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew, 2002. In Defence of the ‘Democratic Deficit’: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4): 603–24.Google Scholar

Mujezinovic Larsen, Kjetil, Guldahl Cooper, Camilla, and Nystuen, Gro, eds., 2013. Searching for a ‘Principle of Humanity’ in International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, Richard, 2010. Country-by-Country Reporting: Shining Light on Financial Statements. Chesham, Bucks: Tax Justice Network. Available at: www.taxjustice.net/topics/corporate-tax/country-by-country.Google Scholar

Murray, Robert W., 2016. Seeking Order in Anarchy: Multilateralism as State Strategy. Edmonton: The University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar

Murray, Robert W. and Hehir, Aidan, 2012. Intervention in the Emerging Multipolar System: Why R2P Will Miss the Unipolar Moment. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 6 (4): 387–404.Google Scholar

Muthuri, Judy N., Moon, Jeremy, and Idemudia, Uwafiokun, 2012. Corporate Innovation and Sustainable Community Development in Developing Countries. Business and Society 51 (3): 355–81.Google Scholar

Nash, Roderick F., 1989. The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Neumann, Iver B., 2004. Beware of Organicism: The Narrative Self of the State. Review of International Studies 30 (2): 259–67.Google Scholar

Nicholson, Max, 1972. The Environmental Revolution. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, 2012. National Courts and the International Rule of Law Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, 2016. Political Economy and the Responsibility of States: The Problem of Many Hands in International Law. In The Political Economy of International Law: A European Perspective, edited by Fabricotti, Alberta, 278–309. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André, Jacobs, Dov, and Schechinger, Jessica N. M., eds., 2015. Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

O'Neill, Onora, 1986. Who Can Endeavour Peace? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1): 41–73.Google Scholar

O'Neill, Onora, 2005. Agents of Justice. In Global Responsibilities – Who Must Deliver on Human Rights?, edited by Kuper, Andrew, 37–52. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

OECD, 2013. Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. Paris: OECD. Available at: www.oecd.org/ctp/BEPSActionPlan.pdf.Google Scholar

OECD, 2016. Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High Risk Areas. Paris: OECD. Available at: www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/mining.htm.Google Scholar

Okereke, Chukwumerije, (2008). Global Justice and Neoliberal Environmental Governance: Ethics, Sustainable Development and International Co-Operation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Oliver, George F., 2002. The Other Side of Peacekeeping: Peace Enforcement and Who Should Do It? In International Peacekeeping: The Yearbook of International Peace Operations, edited by Langholtz, Harvey, Kondoch, Boris, and Wells, Alan, 99–117. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Orford, Anne, 2011. International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Osborn, Fairfield, 1948. Our Plundered Planet. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar

Ott, Hermann E., Sterk, Wolfgang, and Watanabe, Rie, 2008. The Bali Roadmap – New Horizons for Global Climate Policy. Climate Policy 8 (1): 91–5.Google Scholar

Palazzo, Guido and Scherer, Andreas G., 2006. Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1): 71–88.Google Scholar

Palme, Olof, 1982. Common Security: A Programme for Disarmament (The Report of the Independent Commission on Disarmament and Security Issues under the Chairmanship of Olof Palme). London: Pan.Google Scholar

Pape, Robert A., 2012. When Duty Calls: A Pragmatic Standard of Humanitarian Intervention. International Security 37 (1): 41–80.Google Scholar

Park, Susan and Vetterlein, Antje, eds., 2010. Owning Development: Creating Global Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pattberg, Phillip, 2005. The Institutionalization of Private Governance: How Business and Non-profit Organizations Agree Transnational Rules. Governance 18 (4): 589–610.Google Scholar

Pauw, Pieter, Bauer, Steffen, Richerzhagen, Carmen, Brandi, Clara, and Schmole, Hanna, 2014. Different Perspectives on Differentiated Responsibilities. A State of the Art Review of the Notion of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities in International Negotiations. German Development Institute Discussion Paper. Available at: www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_6.2014.pdf.Google Scholar

Pedersen, Esben Rahbek, 2010. Modelling CSR: How Managers Understand the Responsibilities of Business towards Society. Journal of Business Ethics 91 (2): 155–66.Google Scholar

Peeters, Wouter, de Smet, Andries, Diependaele, Lisa, and Sterckx, Sigrid, 2015. Climate Change and Individual Responsibility: Agency, Moral Disagreement and the Motivational Gap. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pellet, Alain, 2010. The Definition of Responsibility in International Law. In The Law of International Responsibility, edited by Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon, 3–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

People’s Republic of China, 2014. Statement by Madame Dong Zhihua, Counsellor, Dept of Arms Control and Disarmament, MFA China. Maputo, Mozambique. Available at: www.maputoreviewconference.org/fileadmin/APMBC-RC3/friday/13_HIGH_LEVEL_SEGMENT_-_China.pdf.Google Scholar

Petition to the Inter American Commission on Human Rights Seeking Relief from Violations Resulting from Global Warming Caused by Acts and Omissions of the United States, 2005. Available at: www.ciel.org/Publications/ICC_Petition_7Dec05.pdf.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip, 2001. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip, 2001. Two Sources of Morality. Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2): 102–28.Google Scholar

Picciotto, Sol, 2012. Towards Unitary Taxation of Transnational Corporations. Chesham, Bucks: Tax Justice Network.Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas W. M., 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Pollentine, Marc, 2012. Constructing the Responsibility to Protect. Ph.D. Dissertation. Cardiff: Cardiff University.Google Scholar

Porter, Tony, 2005. Private Authority, Technical Authority, and the Globalization of Accounting Standards. Business and Politics 7 (3): 1–30.Google Scholar

Prakash, Aseem and Potoski, Matthew, 2006. The Voluntary Environmentalists: Green Clubs, ISO 14001, and Voluntary Environmental Regulations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard, 1998. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Landmines. International Organization 52 (3): 613–64.Google Scholar

Price, Richard, 2003. Transnational Civil Society and Advocacy in World Politics. World Politics 55 (4): 579–606.Google Scholar

Price, Richard, 2004. Emerging Customary Norms and Anti-Personnel Landmines. In The Politics of International Law, edited by Reus-Smit, Christian, 106–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Principles on General Rights and Obligations – China and Pakistan – Draft Decision, Prep Com IV, UN Doc. A/CONF.151/PC/WG.III/L.20/Rev.1, 1992.Google Scholar

Pring, George W., 1999. International Law and Mineral Resources. Paper prepared for the Mining, Environment and Development Series, UNCTAD.Google Scholar

Puetter, Uwe and Wiener, Antje, 2009. The Quality of Norms Is What Actors Make of It: Critical Constructivist Research on Norms. Journal of International Law and International Relations 5 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar

Radkau, Joachim, 2011. Die Ära der Ökologie: Eine Weltgeschichte. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Rajamani, Lavanya, 2006. Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rajamani, Lavanya, 2012. The Changing Fortunes of Differential Treatment in the Evolution of International Environmental Law. International Affairs 88 (3): 605–23.Google Scholar

Rajamani, Lavanya, 2016. Ambition and Differentiation in the 2015 Paris Agreement: Interpretative Possibilities and Underlying Politics. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 65 (2): 493–514.Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, 2005. International Law, International Relations and Compliance. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 538–58. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Reckwitz, Andreas, 2002. Toward a Theory of Social Practices. A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 245–65.Google Scholar

Republic of Korea, 1997. Statement by Korea. Ottawa.Google Scholar

Republic of Turkey, 2006. Turkey’s Views on Universalization of the Mine Ban Convention and the Complementary Role of Non-Governmental Organizations. Geneva. Available at: www.apminebanconvention.org/fr/assemblees-des-etats-parties/7msp/conference-documents.Google Scholar

Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area. ITLOS, Seabed Dispute Chamber, 2011.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian, ed., 2004. The Politics of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rietig, Katharina, 2011. Public Pressure versus Lobbying – How Do Environmental NGOs Matter Most in Climate Negotiations? Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper, (79). Available at: www.cccep.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/WP70_environmental-NGOs-climate.pdf.Google Scholar

Riisgaard, Lone, 2009. Global Value Chains, Labour Organization and Private Social Standards. World Development 37 (2): 326–40.Google Scholar

Ringmar, Erik, 2014. The Search for Dialogue as a Hindrance to Understanding: Practices as Inter-paradigmatic Research Program. International Theory 6 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds., 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Roeben, Volker, 2012. Responsibility in International Law. In Yearbook of United Nations Law, edited by von Bogdandy, Armin, and Wolfrum, Rüdiger, 99–158. Leiden: Martinus Nijjhoff.Google Scholar

Rosenau, James N. and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, 1982. International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 36 (2): 379–415.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, 2004. Reconstituting the Global Public Domain – Issues, Actors, and Practices. European Journal of International Relations 10 (4): 499–531.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, 2011. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, 2013. Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, 2014. Global Governance and ‘New Global Governance’ Theory: Lessons from Business and Human Rights. Global Governance 20 (1): 5–17.Google Scholar

S/2001/331 – Report of the Secretary General to the Security Council on the protection of civilians in armed conflict. Available at: www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Disarm%20S2001331.pdfGoogle Scholar

Sagebien, Julia and Lindsay, Nicole Marie, eds., 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance Ecosystems: Emerging Patterns in the Stakeholder Relationships of Canadian Mining Companies Operating in Latin America. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar

Sands, Philipe and Peel, Jacqueline, 2012. Principles of International Environmental Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz, 2007. Reflections on Multilevel Legitimacy. EUSA Review 20 (3): 2–11.Google Scholar

Scherer, Andreas and Palazzo, Guido, 2011. The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and Its Implications for the Firm, Governance and Democracy. Journal of Management Studies 48 (4): 899–930.Google Scholar

Scherer, Andreas, Rasche, Andreas, Palazzo, Guido, and Spicer, Andrew, 2016. Managing for Political Corporate Social Responsibility – New Challenges and Directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies 52 (3): 273–98.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Phillip, 2007. A Fragile Cosmopolitanism: On the Unresolved Ambiguities of the European Public Sphere. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Scholte, Jan Aart, 2010. Governing a More Global World. Corporate Governance 10 (4): 459–74.Google Scholar

Second Review Conference of the States Parties to the CCW, 2001. Final Declaration. Geneva: Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. Available at: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G02/602/61/IMG/G0260261.pdf?OpenElement.Google Scholar

Sewell, William H., 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. The American Journal of Sociology 98 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, 2009. Describing the Elephant: International Justice and Environmental Law. In Environmental Law and Justice in Context, edited by Ebbesson, Jonas and Okowa, Phoebe, 55–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, 2010. Developing Substantive Environmental Rights. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 1 (1): 89–120.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah and Gould, Ariel, 2013. Positive and Negative Obligations. In The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, edited by Shelton, Dinah, 562–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., 2006. Rational Choice Institutionalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Rhodes, Roderick A. W., Binder, Sarah A., and Rockman, Bert A., 23–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smiley, Marion, 1992. Moral Responsibility and the Boundaries of Community: Power and Accountability from a Pragmatic Point of View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Smucker, Joseph, 2006. Pursuing Corporate Social Responsibility in Changing Institutional Fields. In Just Business Practices in a Diverse and Developing World, edited by Bird, Frederick, and Velasquez, Manuel, 81–108. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Solis, Gary D., 2010. The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

SSE, 2019. Sustainable Stock Exchanges Initiative, 2018 Report on Progress. Geneva: UNCTAD. Available at: www.sseinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/SSE_On_Progress_Report_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Theodore, 2002. Down to Earth: Nature's Role in American History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stone, Christopher, 2004. Common but Differentiated Responsibilities in International Law. American Journal of International Law 98 (2): 276–301.Google Scholar

Strange, Susan, 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter F., 1993. Freedom and Resentment. In Perspective on Moral Responsibility, edited by Fischer, John Martin and Ravizza, Mark, 45–66. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Suganami, Hidemi, 1989. The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Suhrke, Astri, 1999. Human Security and the Interests of States. Security Dialogue 30 (3): 265–76.Google Scholar

Tengblad, Stefan and Ohlsson, Claes, 2010. The Framing of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Globalization of National Business Systems: A Longitudinal Case Study. Journal of Business Ethics 93 (4): 653–69.Google Scholar

Thompson, Grahame F. (1982) ‘The Firm as a “Dispersed” Social Agency’. Economy and Society 11, (3): 233–50.Google Scholar

Thompson, Grahame F., 2012. The Constitutionalization of the Global Corporate Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Grahame F. 2015a. Globalization Revisited. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Thompson, Grahame F. 2015b. The Constitutionalisation of Everyday Life? In The Evolution of Intermediary Institutions in Europe: From Corporatism to Governance, edited by Hartmann, Eva and Kjaer, Poul, 177–98. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Thompson, Grahame F. 2016. Reforming the Culture of Banking. In The Routledge Companion to Banking Regulation Reform, edited Ertürk, Ismail and Gabor, Daniela, 398–410. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Train, Russel E., 2003. Politics, Pollution, and Pandas: An Environmental Memoir. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Tricker, Bob, 2012. Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies, and Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tucker, Richar P., 2013. The International Environmental Movement and the Cold War. In The Oxford Handbook of the Cold War, edited by Immerman, Richard H. and Goedde, Petra, 565–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Turnbull, Shann, 1994. Stakeholder Democracy: Redesigning the Governance of Firms and Bureaucracies. The Journal of Socio-Economics 23 (3): 321–60.Google Scholar

Uekötter, Frank, 2004. Wie neu sind die Neuen Sozialen Bewegungen? Revisionistische Bemerkungen vor dem Hintergrund der umwelthistorischen Forschung. (31): 115–38.Google Scholar

Ukraine, , 2014 Remarks by the Ukrainian delegation on compliance with the provisions of the Ottawa Treaty. Geneva. Available at: www.apminebanconvention.org/fileadmin/APMBC/IWP/IM-apr14/3_COMPLIANCE_-_Ukraine.pdf .Google Scholar

Ulfstein, Geir and Christiansen, Hege Føsund, 2013. The Legality of the NATO Bombing in Libya. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62 (1): 159–71.Google Scholar

UNFCCC, 2008. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Thirteenth Session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007 (Document UNFCCC/CP/2007/6/Add1).Google Scholar

United Nations, 1945. Charter of the United Nations. San Francisco. Available at: www.un.org/en/charter-united-nations.Google Scholar

United Nations, 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, New York: United Nations, FCCC/INFORMAL/84. Available at: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.Google Scholar

United Nations, 1998. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf.Google Scholar

United Nations, 2008. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Thirteenth Session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007. Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/cop13/eng/06a01.pdf.Google Scholar

United Nations, 2012. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Seventeenth Session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011. Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdf.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), 2005. 2005 World Summit Outcome, A/RES/60/1 New York. Available at: www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_60_1.pdf.Google Scholar

United States of America, 2014. Fact Sheet: Changes to U.S. Anti-Personnel Landmine Policy. White House, Office of the Press Secretary. Available at: www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/09/23/fact-sheet-changes-us-anti-personnel-landmine-policy.Google Scholar

United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimps and Shrimps Products, WT/DS58/RW, 2001.Google Scholar

United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimps and Shrimps Products, WT/DS58/AB/R, 1998.Google Scholar

Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment), 2015. Case number: C/09/456689 / HA ZA 13-1396 (English translation). Available at: http://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196.Google Scholar

Vagts, Detlef F., 2000. The Hague Conventions and Arms Control. The American Journal of International Law 94 (1): 31–41.Google Scholar

Van Tulder, Rob, van Wijk, Jeroen, and Kolk, Ans, 2009. From Chain Liability to Chain Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2): 399–412.Google Scholar

Veldman, Jeroen, 2013. Politics of the Corporation. British Journal of Management 24 (1): 18–30.Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo, 2009. Legal Contestation about ‘Enemy Combatants’: On the Exercise of Power in Legal Interpretation. Journal of International Law and International Relations 5 (1): 157–84.Google Scholar

Vetterlein, Antje, 2018. Responsibility Is More than Accountability: From Regulatory towards Negotiated Governance. Contemporary Politics 24(5): 545–67.Google Scholar

Vincent, Raymond J., 1986. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vogel, David, 2005. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Vogt, Andreas, de Carvalho, Benjamin, Hojem, Petter, and Glad, Marit, 2008. The Protection of Civilians and the Post-Conflict Security Sector: A Conceptual and Historical Overview. Oslo: NUPI.Google Scholar

Vogt, William, 1948. Road to Survival. New York: W. Sloane Associates.Google Scholar

Voigt, Christina and Ferreira, Felipe, 2016. Differentiation in the Paris Agreement. Climate Law 6 (1–2): 58–74.Google Scholar

Walker, Rob, 1995 [1989]. History and Structure in the Theory of International Relations. In International Theory. Critical Investigations, edited by Der Derian, James, 308–39. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael, 1977. Just and Unjust Wars – A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. London: Allan Lane.Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael, 1995. The Politics of Rescue. Social Research 62 (1): 53–66.Google Scholar

Ward, Barbara, 1966. Spaceship Earth. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Ward, Barbara and Dubos, René, 1972. Only One Earth: The Care and Maintenance of a Small Planet. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Warner, David, 1993. An Ethic of Responsibility in International Relations and the Limits of Responsibility/Community. Alternatives 18 (4): 431–52.Google Scholar

Webb, Kernaghan, 2012. ISO 26000: Bridging the Public/Private Divide in Transnational Business Governance Interactions. Osgoode Hall Law School, Comparative Research in Law and Political Economy (CLPE) Research Paper Series, Research Paper #21.Google Scholar

Weiss, Thomas G., 2004. The Humanitarian Impulse. In The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century, edited by Malone, David M., 37–54. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Weiss, Thomas G. and Korn, David A., 2006. Internal Displacement: Conceptualization and Its Consequences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Weitsman, Patricia A., 2013. Waging War: Alliances, Coalitions, and Institutions of Interstate Violence. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Weldes, Jutta, 1998. Bureaucratic Politics: A Critical Constructivist Assessment. Mershon International Studies Review 42 (2): 216–25.Google Scholar

Weller, Mark, ed., 2015. The Oxford Handbook on the Use of Force in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wells, Celia, 2001. Corporations and Criminal Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Welsh, Jennifer M., 2011. Civilian Protection in Libya: Putting Coercion and Controversy Back into RtoP. Ethics and International Affairs 25 (3): 255–62.Google Scholar

Welsh, Jennifer M. and Banda, Maria, 2010. International Law and the Responsibility to Protect: Clarifying or Expanding State’s Responsibility. Global Responsibility to Protect 2 (3): 213–31.Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, 2004. The State as Person in International Theory. Review of International Studies 30 (2): 289–316.Google Scholar

Wenger, Etienne, 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Werhane, Patricia Hogue, 1985. Persons, Rights and Corporations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Wheeler, Nicholas J., 2001. Legitimating Humanitarian Intervention: Principles and Procedures. Melbourne Journal of International Law 2 (2): 550–67.Google Scholar

Wheeler, Nicholas J., 2002. Saving Strangers – Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wheeler, Nicholas J., 2006. The Humanitarian Responsibility of Sovereignty: Explaining the Development of a New Norm of Military Intervention for Humanitarian Purposes in International Society. In Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations, edited by Welsh, Jennifer M., 29–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

White, Alan, 2016. Shadow State: Inside the Secret Companies that Run Britain. London: Oneworld Books.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje, 2004. Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics. European Journal of International Relations 10 (2): 189–234.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje, 2008. The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje, 2014. A Theory of Contestation. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Wight, Martin, 1996. International Theory: The Three Traditions. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, Garrath, 2008. Responsibility as a Virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (4): 455–70.Google Scholar

Jody, Williams and Goose, Stephen D., 1998. The International Campaign to Ban Landmines. In To Walk without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines, edited by Cameron, Maxwell A., Lawson, Robert J., and Tomlin, Brian W., 20–47. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, Marc, 1993. Re-articulating the Third World Coalition: The Role of the Environmental Agenda. Third World Quarterly 14 (1): 7–29.Google Scholar

Wöbse, Anna-Katharina, 2008. Oil on Troubled Waters? Environmental Diplomacy in the League of Nations. Diplomatic History 32 (4): 519–37.Google Scholar

Wöbse, Anna-Katharina, 2012. Weltnaturschutz: Umweltdiplomatie in Völkerbund und Vereinten Nationen 1920–1950. Frankfurt/M.: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar

World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Report), 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Worster, Donald, 1994. Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, Karen, 2014. Corporations as Political Animals: Citizenship Traditions and Corporate Social Responsibility. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Consortium for Political Research held in Glasgow, 3–5 September.Google Scholar

Yakovleva, Natalia, 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Mining Industries. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

Yanow, Dvora, 2009. What’s Political about Political Ethnography? Abducting Our Way toward Reason and Meaning. Newsletter of the American Political Science Association 7 (2): 33–7.Google Scholar

Young, Iris M., 2011. Guilt versus Responsibility: A Reading and Partial Critique of Hannah Arendt. In Responsibility for Justice, edited by Young, Iris M. and Nussbaum, Martha, 75–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, 1998. Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, 2018. A Theory of Global Governance – Authority, Legitimacy & Contestation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, Nollkaemper, André, and Peerenboom, Randy, eds., 2012. Rule of Law Dynamics – In an Era of International and Transnational Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zweifel, Thomas D., 2002. Who Is without Sin Cast the First Stone: The EU’s Democratic Deficit in Comparison. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (5): 812–40.Google Scholar