Alexandrova, E. I. (1998). Matematika: Uchebnik dlia 1 klassa (Mathematics for the 1st grade). Moscow: Dom Pedagogiki.Google Scholar

,American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

,American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, N. (1996). A functional theory of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Atahanov, R. (2000). Matematicheskoe myshlenie I metodiki opredelenija urovnej ego razvitija (Mathematical reasoning and methods of the assessment of the stages of its development). Riga, Latvia: Eksperiments.Google Scholar

Boyer, C. B. (2004). History of analytic geometry. Mineola, NY: Dover Press.Google Scholar

Boyer, C., and Merzbach, U. (1991). A history of mathematics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Brown, A., and Ferrara, R. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 273–305). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1968). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Cajori, F. (1993). A history of mathematical notations. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (Winter 1999/2000). Support them and they will come. Issues in Science and Technology Online. Retrieved January 4, 2005, from www.issues.org

Campione, J., and Brown, A. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 82–113). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The Zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, and S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chazan, D. (2000). Beyond formulas in mathematics and teaching dynamics of the high school algebra classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Cioffi, G., and Carney, J. (1983). Dynamic assessment of reading disabilities. The Reading Teacher, 36, 764–768.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Coolidge, J. L. (1942). A history of geometrical methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crosby, A. (1997). The measure of reality: Quantification and Western society. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. (2000). Learning to read in a second language. In S. Shaw (Ed.), Intercultural education in European classroom. Stone-on-Trent, UK: Trentham Books.Google Scholar

Davydov, V. (1988a). Problems of developmental teaching: Part 1. Soviet Education, 8, 15–97.Google Scholar

Davydov, V. (1988b). Problems of developmental teaching: Part 2. Soviet Education, 9, 3–83.Google Scholar

Davydov, V. (1988c). Problems of developmental teaching: Part 3. Soviet Education, 10, 3–77.Google Scholar

Davydov, V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar

Davydov, V. (1992). The psychological analysis of multiplication procedures. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 14, 3–67.Google Scholar

Davydov, V., Gorbov, S., Mikulina, G., and Saveleva, O. (1999). Mathematics: Class 1. Binghamton, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar

Davydov, V., and Tsvetkovich, Z. (1991). On the objective origin of the concept of fractions. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 14, 3–67.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. (2001). Discourse on method, optics, geometry, and meteorology. P. J. Oscamp (Tr.). Indianapolis, IN: Hachett.Google Scholar

Duckworth, E. (1987). The having of wonderful ideas. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., and Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar

Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., and Harman, H. H. (1979). Cognitive factors: Their identification and replication. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monograph, 79(2), 1–85.Google Scholar

Eves, H. (1990). An introduction to the history of mathematics. Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R. (1990). The theory of structural cognitive modifiability. In B. Presseisen (Ed.), Learning and thinking styles (pp. 68–134). Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R., Krasilovsky, D., and Rand, Y. (1978). Modifiability during adolescence. In J. Anthony (Ed.), The child and his family: Children and their parents in a changing world (pp. 197–217). London: Wiley.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., and Hoffman, M. (1979). Dynamic assessment of retarded performers. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M., and Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Falik, L., and Feuerstein, R. S. (2002). Dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability. Jerusalem: ICELP Press.Google Scholar

Foshay, A. (2007). Brief history of IEA. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Retrieved July 14, 2007, from http://www.iea.nl/brief_ history_of_iea.html

Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.). (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Gerber, M. (2000). Dynamic assessment for students with learning disabilities. In C. Lidz and J. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 263–292). New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Gillings, R. J. (1972). Mathematics in the time of the Pharaohs. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, A., Cooke, G., Leinwand, S., Noell, J., and Pollock, E. (2005). Reassessing U.S. international mathematics performance: New findings from the 2003 TIMSS and PISA. Washington, DC: American Institute for Research.Google Scholar

Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism. London: Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guthke, J., and Beckmann, J. (2000). Learning test concept and dynamic assessment. In A. Kozulin and Y. Rand (Eds.), Experience of mediated learning (pp. 175–190). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Guthke, J., and Wingenfeld, S. (1992). The learning test concept: Origins, state of art, and trends. In C. Haywood and D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 64–93). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Harpaz, Y. (2007). Approaches to teaching thinking: Toward a conceptual mapping of the field. Teachers College Record, 109(8), 1845–1874.Google Scholar

Hatano, G. (1997). Learning arithmetic with an abacus. In T. Nunes and P. Bryant (Eds.), Learning and teaching mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 209–232). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Haycock, K. (2001). Closing the achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 6–11.Google Scholar

Haywood, C., and Lidz, C. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Henningsen, M., and Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrenstein, R., and Murrey, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Hiebert, J., and Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hiebert, J., Stigler, J., Jacobs, J., Givvin, K., Garnier, H., Smith, M., Hollingworth, H., Monaster, A., Wearne, D., and Gallimore, R. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today and tomorrow. Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, G. (2000). Mathematics achievement by immigrant children. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(25), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, D., and Kozulin, A. (2007). Dynamic assessment of proportional reasoning: Human vs. computer-based mediation. Paper presented at the 12th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Budapest.

Karpov, Y. (2003a). Vygotsky's doctrine of scientific concepts. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V., and Miller, S. (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 65–82). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Karpov, Y. (2003b). Development through the life-span: A neo-Vygotkian approach. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V., and Miller, S. (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 138–155). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kinard, J. (2001). Cognitive, affective and academic changes in specially challenged inner city youth. In Kozulin, A., Feuerstein, R., and Feuerstein, R. S. (Eds.), Mediated learning experience in teaching and counseling (pp. 55–64). Jerusalem: ICELP Press.Google Scholar

Kinard, J., and Kozulin, A. (2005). Rigorous mathematical thinking: Mediated learning and psychological tools. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 22, 1–29.Google Scholar

Kline, M. (1972). Mathematical thought from ancient to modern times. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kozulin, A. (1995). The learning process: Vygotsky's theory in the mirror of its interpretations. School Psychology International, 16, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozulin, A. (1998a). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kozulin, A. (1998b). Profiles of immigrant students' cognitive performance on Raven's progressive matrices. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 1311–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozulin, A. (2000). Diversity of Instrumental Enrichment applications. In A. Kozulin and Y. Rand (Eds.), Experience of mediated learning (pp. 257–273). Oxford: Elsevier Scientific.Google Scholar

Kozulin, A. (2005a). Integration of culturally different students in mainstream classes. Paper presented at the International Conference on Inclusive and Cognitive Learning in Schools, Prague.

Kozulin, A. (2005b). Who needs metacognition more: Teachers or students? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.

Kozulin, A., and Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23, 112–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozulin, A., and Garb, E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of literacy: English as a third language. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V., and Miller, S. (Eds.). (2003). Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozulin, A., Kaufman, R., and Lurie, L. (1997). Evaluation of the cognitive intervention with immigrant students from Ethiopia. In A. Kozulin (Ed.), The ontogeny of cognitive modifiability. Jerusalem: ICELP Press.Google Scholar

Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship. London: Eyre.Google Scholar

Lidz, C., and Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, and S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 99–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Luria, A. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lindquist, M. (Ed.). (1989). Results from the 4th mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Mathematical Progress. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar

Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J. (2000). Transforming classroom grading. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom assessment and grading that work. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1974). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Menninger, K. (1969). Number words and number symbols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Morris, A. (2000). A teaching experiment: Introducing 4th graders to fractions from the viewpoint of measuring quantities using Davydov's mathematics curriculum. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 22, 32–84.Google Scholar

National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century and submitted to former U.S. Secretary of Education, Riley, Richard W.. (2000). Before it's too late. Retrieved January 3, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/inits/Math/glenn/report.pdf

,National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar

,National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar

,National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar

,National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar

,National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2001). Navigating in algebra in grades 6–8. Reston, VA: NCTMGoogle Scholar

,National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

,National Science Foundation. (2000). America's investment in the future. Arlington, VA: NSF.Google Scholar

Newton, X. (2007). Reflections on math reforms in the U.S.: A cross-national perspective. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(9), 681–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nunes, T. (1999). Mathematics learning and the socialization of the mind. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Donnell, B., and Taylor, A. (2006/2007). A lesson plan as professional development?: You've got to be kidding!Teaching Children Mathematics: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 13(5), 272–278.Google Scholar

Olson, D. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Olson, S. (1999). Candid camera [Electronic version]. Teacher Magazine, May/June. Retrieved January 3, 2005, from www.ed.gov/inits/Math/glenn/report.pdf

Otis, A. S., and Lennon, R. T. (1996). Otis-Lennon school ability test. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Perkins, D., and Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills content bound?Educational Researcher, 18, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1947/1969). Psychology of intelligence. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1970). Structuralism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Pullan, J. M. (1968). The history of abacus. London: Books That Matter.Google Scholar

Reese, C., Miller, K., Mazzeo, J., and Dossey, J. (1997). NAEP 1996 mathematics report card for the nation and the states. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar

Reys, B., and Lappan, G. (2007). Consensus or confusion?: The intended math curriculum in state-level standards. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(9), 676–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rothman, R. (2006). (In)Formative assessments: New tests and activities can help teachers guide student learning. Harvard Education Letter, 22(6). Retrieved January 3, 2006, from http://www.timeoutfromtesting.org/0519_article_harvard.phpGoogle Scholar

Schmittau, J. (2003). Cultural historical theory and mathematics education. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, and S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 225–245). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schmittau, J. (2004). Vygotskian theory and mathematical education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schoultz, J., Saljo, R., and Wyndhamn, J. (2001). Heavenly talk: Discourse, artifacts and children's understanding of elementary astronomy. Human Development, 44, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scribner, S., and Cole, M. (1981). Psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sertima, I. V. (Ed.). (1984). Blacks in science, ancient and modern. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar

Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the danger of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smeltzer, D. (2003). Man and number. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar

Smith, D. E. (1958). History of mathematics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Smith, I., Martin, M., Mullis, I., and Kelly, D. (2000). Profiles of student achievement in science at the TIMSS international benchmarks. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar

Stafylidou, S., and Vosniadou, S. (2004). The development of students' understanding of fractions. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 503–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stech, S. (2007). Special features of cognition and learning in the school context. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, 2, 63–76.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. (1980). Sketch of a componental subtheory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 573–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R., and Grigorenko, E. (2002). Dynamic testing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stigler, J., Chalip, L., and Miller, K. F. (1986). Consequences of skill: The case of abacus training in Taiwan. American Journal of Education, 94(4), 447–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stigler, J., and Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instruction: An overview of TIMSS video study. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(1), 14–21.Google Scholar

Sunderman, G., and Orfield, G. (2006). Domesticating a revolution: No Child Left Behind reforms and state administrative response. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 526–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vamvakoussi, X., and Vosniadou, S. (2004). Understanding the structure of the set of rational numbers. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verschaffel, L. (1999). Realistic mathematical modeling and problem solving in the upper elementary school. In J. H. M. Hamers, J. E. H. Van Luit, and B. Csabo (Eds.), Teaching and learning thinking skills (pp. 215–240). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar

Vinovskis, M. A. (2007). Overseeing the nation's report card: The creation and evolution of the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB). Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. (1979). Instrumental method in psychology. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 134–143). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. (1998). Child psychology: The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 5). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L., and Luria, A. (1993). Studies on the history of behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Werner, H., and Kaplan, B. (1984). Symbol formation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Wixson, K. K., Dutro, E., and Athan, R. G. (2003). The challenge of developing content standards. Review of Research in Education, American Educational Research Association, 27, 69–82.Google Scholar

Wood, D. (1999). Teaching the young child: Some relationships between social interaction, language, and thought. In P. Lloyd and C. Fernyhough (Eds.), Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments (Vol. 3, pp. 259–275). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Xie, X. (2002). The cultivation of problem-solving and reason in NCTM and Chinese national standards. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, School of Education.Google Scholar

Zaslavsky, C. (1984). The Yoruba number system. In I. V. Sertima (Ed.), Blacks in science, ancient and modern (pp. 110–126). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, G. (2003). The learning activity in the first years of schooling. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, and S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 177–199). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, G. (2004). Development of reflection through learning activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar