Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:15:09.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Fourth Estate: A Changing Doctrine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Get access

Summary

‘The paradox of the Fourth Estate, with its head in politics and its feet in commerce can, however, only be understood if it is appreciated that the whole idea of the Fourth Estate was a myth. A myth can combine fact and fiction without any uneasiness existing between the two.’

George Boyce 1978

Recognition of the importance of information, to economic and social well-being, predated general acceptance of the idea that citizens should have access to a wide range of information, to enable them to form opinions and make responsible political judgements. The demand for access to information has had a long history in social and intellectual thought, often accompanied by the idea of providing information for profit (James, 1991: 37–41). As the power of the monarchy, aristocracy and church splintered, challenged by revolutions, and social and political movements, the press emerged and assumed greater power (Stephens, 1988: 170). The press intruded itself into the political system, to become the principal agency for the provision of information to facilitate political choices, and the relationship between the media, politicians, government and citizens encapsulated in the shorthand description, the Fourth Estate, developed. In 1855 George Reeve traced the development from:

slight beginnings … it has overshadowed and surpassed the other estates. It has created the wont which it supplies. It has obtained paramount influence and authority partly by assuming them, but still more by deserving them … taken in its history, position and relations, it is unquestionably the most grave, noticeable and formidable phenomenon … of our times.

(Reeve, 1855:470)
Type
Chapter
Information
Reviving the Fourth Estate
Democracy, Accountability and the Media
, pp. 23 - 46
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×