A Declaration and Resolution of the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament (1642). London.Google Scholar

A Sermon on the Present Situation of the Affairs of America and Great-Britain. Written by a Black, and Printed at the Request of Several Persons of Distinguished Characters (1782). Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Aptheker, H., ed. (1951). A Documentary History of the Negro People in the United States. New York: Citadel.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1996). The Politics and the Constitution of Athens. Ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arminius, J. (1629). Opera Theologica. Leiden.Google Scholar

Arminius, J. (1960). Verklaring van Jacobus Arminius afgelegd in de vergadering van de Staten van Holland op 30 Oktober 1608. Ed. Hoenderdaal, G. J.. Lochem: De Tijdstroom.Google Scholar

Arminius, J. (1986). The Works of James Arminius: The London Edition, vol. ii. Grand Rapids: Baker Books.Google Scholar

Astell, M. (1996). Political Writings. Ed. Springborg, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Augustine, (1992). On Nature and Grace. In Mourant, John A. ed. and trans., St. Augustine: Four Anti-Pelagian Writings, vol. 86 of The Fathers of the Church. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, pp. 22–92.Google Scholar

Azo, P. (1557). Summa Institutionum. In Summa Aurea. Lyon, fols. 267v–329v.Google Scholar

Bacon, F. (1994). Novum Organum. Ed. and trans. Urbach, P. and Gibson, J.. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar

Blanqui, A. (1834 [1993]). La richesse sociale doit appartenir à ceux qui l’ont créée. In Le Nuz, D. ed., Oeuvres I: Des Origines à la Révolution de 1848. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy, pp. 283–90; (2018). Social Wealth Must Belong to Those Who Created It. In Le Goff, P., Hallward, P., and Abidor, M. eds. and trans., The Blanqui Reader: Political Writings, 1830–1880. London: Verso, pp. 48–55. (References in text are divided by a forward slash).Google Scholar

Bracton, H. de (1569). De Legibus & Consuetudinibus Angliae Libri quinque. London.Google Scholar

Brandt, C. (1727). Historie van het leven des heeren Huig de Groot. Completed by van Cattenburgh, A.. Dordrecht/Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Brissot, J. P. de W. (1792). Nouveau Voyage dans les Etats Unis de l’Amérique Septentrionale, fait in 1788. Paris.Google Scholar

Burke, E. (2014). Revolutionary Writings. Ed. Hampsher-Monk, I.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Calonne, C. de (1789). Lettre adressé au Roi. London.Google Scholar

Calonne, C. de (1790). De l’état de la France: Tel qu’il peut et qu’il doit être. London.Google Scholar

Calonne, C. de (1791). Considerations on the Present and Future State of France. Translated from the French. London.Google Scholar

Calonne, C. de (1795). Tableau de l’Europe en novembre 1795, et pensées sur ce qu’on a fait & qu’on n’auroit pas dû faire (…). London.Google Scholar

Calonne, C. de (1796a). The political state of Europe at the beginning of 1796; or considerations on the most effectual means of procuring a solid and permanent peace. Translated from the French by D. St. Quentin, A.M. London.Google Scholar

Calonne, C. de (1796b). Tableau de l’Europe jusqu’au commencement de 1796; et pensées sur ce qui peut procurer promptement une paix solide. London.Google Scholar

Catéchisme révolutionnaire, ou L’histoire de la Révolution française, par demandes et par réponses: à l’usage de la jeunesse républicaine, et de tous les peuples qui veulent devenir libre (1793). Paris.Google Scholar

Cazenove, J. (1832). Outlines of Political Economy. London.Google Scholar

Coke, E. (1618). Fasciculus Florum. Ed. Ashe, T.. London.Google Scholar

Condorcet, J. (1781). Réflexions sur l’esclavage des nègres. Neufchatel.Google Scholar

Cook, J. (1649). King Charls, his case, or, An appeal to all rational men concerning his tryal at the High Court of Justice. London.Google Scholar

Coornhert, D. V. (1630). Van de Predestinatie, Verkiesinge, ende Verwerpinge Godes. In Wercken, vol. iii. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Dagverhaal der handelingen van de Nationaale vergadering (1796–98), 9 vols. The Hague.Google Scholar

De la Court, J. (1662). Consideratieen van Staat ofte Polityke Weeg-schaal, Waar in met veele redenen, omstandigheden, exempelen, en fabulen, werd overwoogen; welke forme der reegeringe, in speculatie geboud op de practyk, onder de menschen de beste zy, 3rd ed. Ysselmonde.Google Scholar

Dickinson, J. (1768). Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania, to the Inhabitants of the British Colonies. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution Digital Edition, The (2009). Eds. Kaminski, J. P. et al. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Doderidge, J. (1631). The English Lawyer. London.Google Scholar

Edwards, B. (1797). An Historical Survey of the French Colony in the Island of St. Domingo […]; A Narrative of the Calamities […] to the End of 1794. London.Google Scholar

Engels, F. (1845). Die Lage der arbeitenden Klasse in England: Nach eigner Anschauung und autentischen Quellen, Marx Engels Werke (henceforth MEW), vol. 2, Berlin: Dietz Verlag. pp. 225–506; The Condition of the Working-Class in England: From Personal Observation and Authentic Sources, Marx Engels Collected Works (henceforth MECW), London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1975–2005, vol. 4, pp. 295–583.Google Scholar

Engels, F. (1847a [1970]). Entwurf des Kommunistischen Glaubensbekenntnisses. In Der Bund der Kommunisten: Dokumente und Materialien, Band 1: 1836–1849 (Berlin: Dietz Verlag), pp. 470–75; Draft of a Communist Confession of Faith, MECW, vol. 6 pp. 96–103.Google Scholar

Engels, F. (1847b). Grundsätze des Kommunismus, MEW, vol. 4. 1975–2005, pp. 361–80; Principles of Communism, MECW, vol. 6, pp. 341–56.Google Scholar

Equiano, O. (1789). The interesting narrative of the life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African, 8th ed. Norwich.Google Scholar

Erasmus, D., ed. (1536). Origenis Adamantii eximii scripturarum interpretis Opera, quae quidem extant Omnia. Basel.Google Scholar

Erasmus, D., (1543). De amabili ecclesiae Concordia. s.l.Google Scholar

Estienne, H. (1573). Glossaria duo. Paris.Google Scholar

Feller, F. X. de, ed. (1773–94). Journal Historique et Litteraire. Luxembourg, Maastricht, and Liège.Google Scholar

Ferguson, A. (1995 [1767]). An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Ed. Oz-Salzberger, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ficino, M. (2005). Platonic Theology, Vol. IV, Books XV–XVI. Ed. Hankins, J.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Frossard, B. (1789). La cause des esclaves nègres et des habitants de la Guinée, portée au tribunal de la justice, de la religion, de la politique; ou Histoire de la traite & de l’esclavage des nègres, preuves de leur illégitimité, moyens de les abolir sans nuire ni aux colonies ni aux colons, vol. i. Lyon.Google Scholar

Gans, E. (1836). Rückblicke auf Personen und Zustände. Berlin.Google Scholar

Gomarus, F. (2010). Theological Disputation on Free Choice. In Van Asselt, W. J., Bac, J. M., and Te Velde, R. T. eds., Reformed Thought on Freedom: The Concept of Free Choice in Early Modern Reformed Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, pp. 128–33.Google Scholar

Gouges, O. (1789). Le Bohneur Primitif, ou Reveries Patriotiques. Amsterdam, Paris.Google Scholar

Gouges, O. (1790/2014). Les Droits de la Femme. In Reid, M. ed, Femme réveille-toi! Déclaration des droits de la femme et de la citoyenne et autres écrits. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. (1625). Of the Government and Rites of the Antient Church/Conciliation of Grace and Free Will. London.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. (1868). De Iure Praedae Commentarius. Ed. Hamaker, H. G.. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. (1988). Meletius de iis quae inter Christianos conveniunt epistola. Ed. Posthumus Meyjes, H. M.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. (1993). De Iure Belli ac Pacis. Ed. de Kanter-Van Hettinga Tromp, J. A.. Aalen: Scientia Verlag.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. (1995). Ordinum Hollandiae ac Westfrisiae Pietas. Ed. Rabbie, E.. Leiden/New York/Köln: Brill.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. (2005). The Rights of War and Peace, 3 vols. Ed. Tuck, R., Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. (2006a). De Iure Praedae Commentarius. Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, vol. I. Eds. Williams, G. L. and Zeyde, W. H.. Oxford/London: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. (2006b). Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty. Ed. van Ittersum, M.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar

Harrington, J. (1992). The Commonwealth of Oceana. In Pocock, J.G.A. ed., The Commonwealth of Oceana and A System of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–266.Google Scholar

Harrington, J. (1997). The Political Works of James Harrington. Ed. Pocock, J. G. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haynes, L. (1801). The Nature and Importance of True Republicanism: With a few Suggestions Favorable to Independence. A Discourse Delivered at Rutland (Vermont), The Fourth of July – it being the 25th Anniversary of American Independencei. Rutland.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. (1656). The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, and Chance. London.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviathan: Or the Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. Ed. Tuck, R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. (2014). Leviathan, 3 vols. Ed. Malcolm, N.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hopkins, S. (1765). The Rights of Colonies Examined. Providence.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. (1775). Taxation No Tyranny: An Answer to the Resolutions and Address of the American Congress. London.Google Scholar

Junius, F. (2010). Disputation XXII: Free Choice. In van Asselt, Willem J., Bac, J. M., and te Velde, R. T. eds., Reformed Thought on Freedom: The Concept of Free Choice in Early Modern Reformed Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, pp. 95–126.Google Scholar

Justinian, (1985). The Digest of Justinian, 4 vols. Eds. Mommsen, T. and Krueger, P.. Ed. and trans. Watson, A.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Justinian, (1902a). Institutiones. Ed. Krueger, Paul. In Kreuger, Paul and Mommsen, Theodore eds., Corpus Iuris Civilis, vol. i. Berlin: Weidmannos, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar

Justinian, (1902b). Digesta. Ed. Mommsen, Theodore. In Kreuger, Paul and Mommsen, Theodore eds., Corpus Iuris Civilis, vol. i. Berlin: Weidmannos, pp. 1–873 (2nd pagination).Google Scholar

Justinian, (1987). Justinian’s Institutes. Eds. Birks, P. and McLeod, G.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1900). Kants gesammelte Schriften. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Berlin: Georg Reimer, later Walter de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1922). Immanuel Kant: Kritik der Praktischen Vernunft. Ed. Vorländer, K.. Leipzig: F. Meiner.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1960). Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone. Eds. and trans. Greeve, T. M. and Hudson, H. H., intro. Silber, J. R.. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1996a). Immanuel Kant: Religion and Rational Theology. Eds. and trans. Wood, A. and Di Giovanni, G.. Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1996b). Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy. Ed. and trans. Gregor, M. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Konijnenburg, J. (1790). Proeve eener verhandeling over den slaavenhandel en den aankleeve van dien. Bijdragen tot het menschelijk geluk, 4, pp. 86–87.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. (1725). Essais de Theodicée, 2 vols. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. (1864). Theodicy. In Jacques, M. A. ed., Oeuvres de Leibniz, 2ième Série. Paris.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. (2009). Theodicy. Ed. Farrer, A. M., trans. Huggard, E. M.. New York: Cosimo Classics.Google Scholar

Locke, J. (1954). Essays on the Law of Nature. Ed. and trans. von Leyden, W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Locke, J. (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Locke, J. (1976–89). The Correspondence of John Locke, 8 vols. Ed. De Beer, E. S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Locke, J. (1983). A Letter Concerning Toleration. Ed. Tully, James, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Locke, J. (1988). Two Treatise of Government. Ed. Laslett, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Locke, J. (2002). The Reasonableness of Christianity. In Nuovo, V. ed., John Locke: Writings on Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 85–225.Google Scholar

Macaulay, C. (1767). Loose Remarks on certain positions to be found in Mr Hobbes’s ‘Philosophical rudiments of government and society’, with a short sketch of a democratical form of government, In a letter to Signor Paoli. London.Google Scholar

Macaulay, C. (1790). Letters on Education. s.l.Google Scholar

Manetti, G. (2018). De Dignitate et Excellentia Hominis/On Human Worth and Excellence. Ed. and trans. Copenhaver, B.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Marat, J.-P. (1793). Les chaînes de l’esclavage: ouvrage destiné à développer les noirs attentats des princes contre les peuples, les ressorts secrets, les ruses, les menées, les artifices, les coups d’état qu’ils emploient pour détruire la liberté, et les scènes sanglantes qui accompagnent le despotisme. Paris.Google Scholar

Marat, J.-P. (1993). Œuvres politiques, 1789–1793, vol. vi. Eds. de Cock, J. and Goëtz, C.. Brussels: Pôle Nord.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1844a). Zur Judenfrage, MEW, vol. 1, pp. 347–77; On the Jewish Question, MECW, vol. 3, pp. 146–74.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1844b). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844, MEW, Ergänzungsband, vol. 1, pp. 465–588; Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, MECW, vol. 3, pp. 229–346.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1844c). Auszüge aus James Mills Buch ‘Élemens d’economie politique’, MEW, Ergänzungsband, vol. 1, pp. 443–63; Comments on James Mill, ‘Élemens d’economie politique’, MECW, vol. 3, pp. 211–28.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1846). Marx an Pawel Wassiljewitsch Annenkow, 28. Dezember 1846, MEW, vol. 27, pp. 451–63; Marx to Pavel Vasilyevich Annenkov, 28 December 1846, MECW, vol. 38, pp. 95–106.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1847). Arbeitslohn, MEW, vol. 6, pp. 535–56; Wages, MECW, vol. 6, pp. 415–37.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1848). Rede über die Frage des Freihandels, MEW, vol. 4, pp. 444–58; Speech on the Question of Free Trade, MECW, vol. 6, pp. 450–65.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1849). Lohnarbeit und Kapital, MEW, vol. 6, pp. 397–423; Wage-Labour and Capital, MECW, vol. 9, pp. 197–228.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1857–58). Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, MEW, vol. 42; Outlines of the Critique of Political Economy, MECW, vol. 28.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1858). Marx an Engels, 2 April 1858, MEW, vol. 29, pp. 311–18; Marx to Engels, 2 April 1858, MECW, vol. 40, pp. 296–304.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1859). Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, MEW, vol. 13, pp. 3–160; Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, MECW, vol. 29, pp. 267–417.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1863–64). Sechstes Kapitel. Resultate des unmittelbaren Produktionsprozesses, Marx Engels Gesamtausgabe (henceforth MEGA^②), Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1975–98; Akademie Verlag, 1998–, vol. II.4.1, pp. 24–135; Chapter Six. Results of the Direct Production Process, MECW, vol. 34, pp. 355–466.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1864a). Inauguraladresse der Internationalen Arbeiter-Assoziation, MEW, vol. 16, pp. 5–13; Inaugural Address of the Working Men’s International Association, MECW, vol. 20, pp. 5–13.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1864b). Marx an Engels, 4 November 1864, MEW, vol. 31, pp. 9–18; Marx to Engels, 4 November 1864, MECW, vol. 42, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1865). Lohn, Preis und Profit, MEW, vol. 16, pp. 101–52; Value, Price and Profit, MECW, vol. 20, pp. 101–49.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1866). Instruktionen für die Delegierten des Provisorischen Zentralrats zu den einzelnen Fragen, MEW, vol. 16, pp. 190–99; Instructions for the Delegates of the Provisional General Council. The different questions, MECW, vol. 20, pp. 185–94.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1867). Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, erster Band, Buch 1: Der Produktionsprozeß des Kapitals, MEW, vol. 23; Capital: Critique of Political Economy, vol. i, book 1: The Process of Production of Capital, MECW, vol. 35.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1871a). Der Bürgerkrieg in Frankreich, MEW, vol. 17, pp. 313–65; The Civil War in France, MECW, vol. 22, pp. 307–55.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1871b). Erster Entwurf zum ‘Bürgerkrieg in Frankreich’, MEW, vol. 17, pp. 493–571; First Draft of ‘The Civil War in France’, MECW, vol. 22, pp. 437–514.Google Scholar

Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1848). Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei, MEW, vol. 4, pp. 459–93; Manifesto of the Communist Party, MECW, vol. 6, pp. 477–519.Google Scholar

Milton, J. (1931–38). The Works of John Milton,18 vols. Ed. Patterson, F. A.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Milton, J. (1953–82). Complete Prose Works of John Milton, 8 vols., with revised 2nd ed. of vol. 7. Ed. Wolfe, D. M.. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Milton, J. (1971). Paradise Lost. Ed. Fowler, A.. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Milton, J. (1991a). John Milton: A Critical Edition of the Major Works. Eds. Orgel, S. and Goldberg, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Milton, J. (1991b). Political Writings. Ed. Dzelzainis, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Milton, J. (1999a). Areopagitica. In Alvis, J. ed., Areopagitica and Other Political Writings of John Milton. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 3–51.Google Scholar

Milton, J. (1999b). The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates. In Alvis, J. ed., Areopagitica and Other Political Writings of John Milton. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 53–97.Google Scholar

Montaigne, M. de (1958). The Complete Essays of Montaigne. Trans. Frame, D.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Montaigne, M. de (1991). On Experience. In Screech, M.A. trans., The Complete Essays. London: Penguin, pp. 1207–69.Google Scholar

Montaigne, M. de (2007). Les Essais. Ed. Balsamo, J., Magnien, M., and Magnien-Simonin, C.. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Nedham, M. (1656). The Excellencie of a Free-State. London.Google Scholar

Neville, H. (1681). Plato Redivivus: Or, A Dialogue Concerning Government, London.Google Scholar

Otis, J. (1764). The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved. Boston.Google Scholar

Overton, R. (1646). An Arrow Against All Tyrants, And Tyrany. s.l.Google Scholar

Paley, W. (1785). The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. London.Google Scholar

Parker, H. (1642). Observations upon some of his Majesties late Answers and Expresses. London.Google Scholar

Parker, H. (1644). Jus Populi. Or, a Discourse wherein clear satisfaction is given, as well concerning the Right of Subiects, as the Right of Princes. London.Google Scholar

Philanthropos, [David Rice] (1792). Slavery Inconsistent with Justice and Good Policy proved by a Speech Delivered in the Convention held at Danville, Kentucky. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Plato, (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Eds. Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Price, R. (1991). Political Writings. Ed. Thomas, D. O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Priestley, J. (1993). Political Writings. Ed. Miller, P. N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Raynal, G. T. (1770). L’Histoire philosophique et politique des établissements et du commerce des Européens dans les deux Indes, 4 vols. Amsterdam: s.n.Google Scholar

Raynal, (1780). Histoire philosophique et politique des établissements et du commerce des Européens dans les deux Indes. Geneva.Google Scholar

Roland, M. J. (1827). Mémoires de Madame Roland, avec une notice sur sa vie, des notes et des éclaircissements historiques. Eds. Berville, J. and Barrière, A.. Paris: Baudoin Frère.Google Scholar

Roland, M. J. (1900). Lettres de Madame Roland (1780–1793). Ed. Perroud, C.. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J. (1763). Projet de constitution pour la Corse. Digitized by Jean-Marie Tremblay for Les classiques des sciences sociales. Quebec: Bibliothèque Paul-Emile-Boulet.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J. (1968). Politics and the Arts: Letter to D’Alembert on the Theatre. Trans. and intro. Allan, Bloom. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J. (1996). Émile. Trans. Foxley, B.. London: Everyman.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J. (1997a). The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings. Ed. and trans. Gourevitch, V.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J. (1997b). New Heloise. Ed. Vache, J., trans. Steward, P.. Lebanon: University Press of New England.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J. (1997c). Rousseau: The Discourses and Other Early Political writings. Ed. and trans. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J. (1997d). The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Ed. and trans. Gourevitch, V.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rush, B. (1947). On Slave-Keeping. In The Selected Writings of Benjamin Rush. New York: Philosophical Library, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar

Selden, J. (1614). Titles of Honor. London.Google Scholar

Sallust, (2013). The War with Catiline: The War with Jugurtha. Ed. Ramsey, J. T., trans. Rolfe, J. C.. Loeb Classical Library 116. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sidney, A. (1968). Discourses concerning Government. London.Google Scholar

Smith, T. (1982). De Republica Anglorum. Ed. Dewar, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spinoza, B. (2002). Complete Works. Ed. Morgan, Michael, trans. Shirley, Samuel. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Stanhope Smith, S. (1812). On the Relation between Master and Servant. In Lecture … on Subjects of Moral and Political Philosophy. Trenton, pp. 159–179.Google Scholar

Thysius, A. (1625). On the Free Will. In Synopsis purerioris theologiae. Leiden.Google Scholar

Tucker, St. G. (1796). A Dissertation on Slavery: With a Proposal for the Gradual Abolition of It in the State of Virginia. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Veluanus, A. (1906). Kort bericht in alle principalen punten des christen geloves, mit klair ghetuichnis der hilligher schriffturen un guede kunstschafft der alden doctoren/ mit anwysung wanneer unde durch welcke personen die erroren opgestanden unde vermeert zijnen/ bereit vur den simpelen ongelerden christen, un is des halven genant der leken wechwyser, Strassburch. In Cramer, S. and Pijper, F. eds., Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica, vol. vi. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, pp. 123–376.Google Scholar

Vos, W. de (1797). Over den slaaven-stand. Leiden.Google Scholar

Vrymoedige gedachten van een (geweest zynde) Demerariaansch planter (1795). Amsterdam.Google Scholar

West, K. (2018). ‘Kanye West just said 400 years of slavery was a choice’. CNN, 4 May 2018.Google Scholar

Wollstonecraft, M. (1792/1992). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Wollstonecraft, M. (1792/2014). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Ed. Botting, E. H.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Wollstonecraft, M. (1992). The Wrongs of Woman: Or, Maria. Ed. Todd, J.. London: Penguin Classics, pp. 55–148.Google Scholar

Wollstonecraft, M. (1995a). A Vindication of the Rights of Men. In Tomaselli, S. ed., A Vindication of the Rights of Men with A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and Hints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar

Wollstonecraft, M. (1995b). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. In Tomaselli, S. ed., A Vindication of the Rights of Men with A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and Hints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achinstein, S. (1994). Milton and the Revolutionary Reader. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, D., and Somanathan, R. (2020). Difference without Domination: Pursuing Justice in Diverse Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, E. (2017a). Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don’t Talk about It). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, E. (2017b). Thomas Paine’s ‘Agrarian Justice’ and the Origins of Social Insurance. In Schliesser, E. ed., Ten Neglected Classics of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–83.Google Scholar

Ando, C. (2010). ‘A Dwelling beyond Violence’: On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Contemporary Republicans. History of Political Thought, 31, pp. 183–220.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1961). What Is Freedom? In Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. London: Viking, pp. 143–71.Google Scholar

Armenteros, C., and Lebrun, R. A., eds. (2010). Joseph de Maistre and His European Readers: From Friedrich Gentz to Isaiah Berlin. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Armitage, D. (2004). John Locke, Carolina, and the Two Treatises of Government. Political Theory, 32(5), pp. 602–27.Google Scholar

Armitage, D. (2014). Foreword. In Palmer, R. R. ed., The Age of Democratic Revolution. A Political History of Europe and America, 1760–1800. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Arnold, S. (2017). Capitalism, Class Conflict, and Domination. Socialism and Democracy, 31(1), 106–24.Google Scholar

Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bailyn, B. (1992). The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, enlarged ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, K. M. (1990). Inventing the French Revolution: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, K. M. (2001). Transformations of Classical Republicanism in Eighteenth-Century France. Journal of Modern History, 73, pp. 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P. (2013). The Franchise Debate Revisited: The Levellers and the Army. In Taylor, S. and Tapsell, G. eds., The Nature of the English Revolution Revisited. Woodbridge: Boydell, pp. 103–22.Google Scholar

Balaguer, M. (2014). Free Will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baldwin, T. (1984). MacCallum and the Two Concepts of Freedom. Ratio, 26, pp. 125–42.Google Scholar

Barducci, M. (2017). Hugo Grotius and the Century of Revolution, 1613–1718: Transnational Reception in English Political Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baron, H. (1955). The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance: Civic Humanism and Republican Liberty in an Age of Classicism and Tyranny. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Barry, B. (1965). Political Argument. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Beik, P. H. (1956/1970). The French Revolution Seen from the Right: Social Theories in Motion, 1789–1799. In Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series 46, part i. New York: Howard Fertig.Google Scholar

Beitz, C. R. (2009). The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bejan, T. M. (2019). Since All the World Is Mad, Why Should Not I Be So? Mary Astell on Equality, Hierarchy, and Ambition. Political Theory, 47(6), 781–808.Google Scholar

Belissa, M. (2006). Repenser l‘ordre européen (1795–1802). In La société des rois au droits des nations. Paris: éditions Kimé.Google Scholar

Bell, D. (2014). What Is Liberalism? Political Theory, 42(6), pp. 682–715.Google Scholar

Bellamy, R. (2007). Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Benn, S. I., and Weinstein, W. L. (1971). Being Free to Act, and Being a Free Man. Mind, 80(318), pp. 194–211.Google Scholar

Bergès, S. (2015). Sophie de Grouchy on the Cost of Domination in the Letters on Sympathy and Two Anonymous Articles in Le Républicain. The Monist, 98, pp. 102–12.Google Scholar

Bergès, S. (2016a). A Republican Housewife: Marie-Jeanne Phlipon Roland on Women’s Political Role. Hypatia, 31, pp. 107–22.Google Scholar

Bergès, S. (2016b). Wet-Nursing and Political Participation: The Republican Approaches to Motherhood of Mary Wollstonecraft and Sophie de Grouchy. In Bergès, S. and Coffee, A. eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–17.Google Scholar

Bergès, S. (2018a). Lucretia and the Impossibility of Female Republicanism in Margaret Cavendish’s Sociable Letters. Hypatia, 33(4), pp. 663–80.Google Scholar

Bergès, S. (2018b). Olympe de Gouges vs Rousseau: Happiness, Primitive Societies and the Theatre. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 4(4), pp. 433–51.Google Scholar

Berkhout, Esmé et. al. (25 January 2021). The Inequality Virus. Oxfam Policy Papers.Google Scholar

Berlin, I. (1958). Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Berlin, I. (2002). Introduction [1969] and Two Concepts of Liberty [1958]. In Hardy, Henry ed., Liberty: Incorporating ‘Four Essays on Liberty’. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–54 and 166–217.Google Scholar

Bernasconi, R., and Mann, A. M. (2005). The Contradictions of Racism: Locke, Slavery, and the Two Treatises. In Valls, Andrew ed., Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 89–107.Google Scholar

Bienenstock, M. (2002). Die ‘soziale Frage’ im französisch-deutschen Kulturaustausch: Gans, Marx und die deutsche Saint-Simon-Rezeption. In Blänkner, R., Göhler, G., and Waszek, N. eds., Eduard Gans (1797–1839): Politischer Professor zwischen Restauration und Vormärz. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag, pp. 153–75.Google Scholar

Blanc, O. (2014). Olympe de Gouges, Des Droits de la Femme à la Guillotine. Paris, Tallandier.Google Scholar

Blockmans, W. (2020). Medezeggenschap: Politieke Participatie in Europa vóór 1800. Amsterdam: Prometheus.Google Scholar

Blom, H. (2007). Spinoza on res publica, Republics and Monarchies. In Blom, H., Laursen, J. C., and Simonutti, L. eds., Monarchisms in the Age of Enlightenment: Liberty, Patriotism, and the Public Good. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 19–44.Google Scholar

Bogin, R. (1983). ‘Liberty Further Extended’: A 1776 Antislavery Manuscript by Lemuel Haynes. The William and Mary Quarterly, 40, pp. 85–105.Google Scholar

Botting, E. H. (2007). Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke, and Rousseau on the Transformation of the Family. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Bouie, J. (2018). The Enlightenment’s Dark Side. The Slate. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/06/taking-the-enlightenment-seriously-requires-talking-about-race.html.Google Scholar

Bourke, R. (2015). Empire & Revolution: The Political Life of Edmund Burke. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J., and Pettit, P. (1990). Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Brand, P. (2010). The Date and Authorship of Bracton: A Response. The Journal of Legal History, 31, pp. 217–44.Google Scholar

Brennan, G., and Lomasky, L. (2006). Against Reviving Republicanism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 5, pp. 221–52.Google Scholar

Brennan, J. (2016). Against Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Buckland, W. W. (1932). A Text-Book of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Budick, S. (2010). Kant and Milton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bugg, J. (2006). The Other Interesting Narrative: Olaudah Equiano’s Public Book Tour. PMLA, 121(5), pp. 1424–42Google Scholar

Burrows, S. (2000). French Exile Journalism and European Politics, 1792–1814. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, G., Corns, T. N., Hale, J. K., and Tweedie, F. J. (2007). Milton and the Manuscript of De Doctrina Christiana. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carter, I. (1999). A Measure of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carter, I. (2003). Liberty. In Bellamy, R. and Mason, A. eds., Political Concepts. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 4–15.Google Scholar

Carter, I. (2008). How Are Power and Unfreedom Related? In Laborde, C. and Maynor, J. eds., Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 58–82.Google Scholar

Carter, I., Kramer, M., and Steiner, H., eds. (2007). Freedom: A Philosophical Anthology. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Castiglione, D. (2005). Republicanism and Its Legacy. European Journal of Political Theory, 4(4), pp. 453–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chernaik, W. (2017). Milton and the Burden of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. (1978). Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. (1979). The Labor Theory of Value and the Concept of Exploitation. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 8(4), pp. 338–60.Google Scholar

Cicerchia, L. (1983). The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(1), pp. 3–33.Google Scholar

Cicerchia, L. (2019). Structural Domination in the Labor Market. European Journal of Political Theory. doi.org/10.1177/1474885119851094.Google Scholar

Clarke, M. T. (2014). Doing Violence to the Roman Idea of Liberty?: Freedom as Bodily Integrity in Roman Political Thought. History of Political Thought, 35, pp. 211–33.Google Scholar

Coffee, A. M. S. J. (2014). Freedom as Independence: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Grand Blessing of Life. Hypatia, 29(4), pp. 908–24.Google Scholar

Coffee, A. M. S. J. (2015). Two Spheres of Domination: Republican Theory, Social Norms and the Insufficiency of Negative Freedom. Contemporary Political Theory, 14, pp. 45–62.Google Scholar

Coffee, A. M. S. J. (2017). Catharine Macaulay’s Republican Conception of Social and Political Liberty. Political Studies, 65(4), pp. 844–59.Google Scholar

Coffee, A. M. S. J. (2018). Independence as Relational Freedom: A Republican Account Derived from Mary Wollstonecraft. In Bergès, S. and Siani, A. eds., Women Philosophers on Autonomy. London: Routledge, pp. 94–111.Google Scholar

Collins, J. (2009). Quentin Skinner’s Hobbes and the Neo-Republican Project. Modern Intellectual History, 6(2), pp. 343–67.Google Scholar

Corbett, R. J. (2006). The Extraconstitutionality of Lockean Prerogative. The Review of Politics, 68(3), pp. 428–48.Google Scholar

Corns, T. N. (1995). Milton and the Characteristics of a Free Commonwealth. In Armitage, D., Himy, A., and Skinner, Q. eds., Milton and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar

Costa, M. V. (2009a). Neo-republicanism, Freedom as Non-domination, and Citizen Virtue. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 8, pp. 401–19.Google Scholar

Costa, M. V. (2009b). Rawls on Liberty and Domination. Res Publica, 15, pp. 397–413.Google Scholar

Cox, R. (2010). Milton, Marriage, and the Politics of Gender. In Hammond, P. and Worden, B. eds., John Milton: Life, Writing, Reputation. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, pp. 125–45.Google Scholar

Craiutu, A. (2012). A Virtue for Courageous Minds: Moderation in French Political Thought, 1748–1830. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cruft, R., Liao, S. M., and Renzo, M. (2015). Introduction. In Cruft, R., Liao, S. M., and Renzo, M. eds., Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar

Cunliffe, M. (1979). Chattel Slavery and Wage Slavery: The Anglo-American Context, 1830–1860. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar

Curran, A. S. (2011). The Anatomy of Blackness: Science and Slavery in an Age of Enlightenment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, D. B. (1975). The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolutions, 1770–1823. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Dawson, H. (2007). Locke, Language and Early-Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dawson, H. (2018a). Fighting for My Mind: Feminist Logic at the Edge of Enlightenment. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 118(3), pp. 275–306.Google Scholar

Dawson, H. (2018b). Shame in Early Modern Thought: From Sin to Sociability. History of European Ideas, 45(3), pp. 377–98.Google Scholar

Dawson, H. (2019). The Place of Democracy in Late Stuart England. In Cuttica, C. and Peltonen, M. eds., Democracy and Anti-Democracy in Early Modern England 1603–1689. Leiden: Brill, pp. 88–110.Google Scholar

De Bruin, B. (2009). Liberal and Republican Freedom. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, pp. 418–39.Google Scholar

Dembour, M. B. (2010). What Are Human Rights? Four Schools of Thought. Human Rights Quarterly, 32, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Deneen, P. J. (2018). Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Deseure, B. (2014). Onhoudbaar verleden. Geschiedenis als politiek instrument tijdens de Franse periode in België. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.Google Scholar

Dijn, A. de. (2008). French Political Thought from Montesquieu to Tocqueville: Liberty in a Levelled Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dijn, A. de. (2020). Freedom: An Unruly History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Douglass, R. (2015). Rousseau and Hobbes: Nature, Free Will, and the Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Drescher, S. (2009). Abolition. In A History of Slavery and Anti-slavery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dubois, L. (2004). A Colony of Citizens: Revolution & Slave Emancipation in the French Caribbean, 1787–1804. Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press.Google Scholar

Dun, J. A. (2016). Dangerous Neighbors: Making the Haitian Revolution in Early America. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar

Dunn, J. (1969). The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald (2000). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dzelzainis, M. (1995). Milton’s Classical Republicanism. In Armitage, D., Himy, A., and Skinner, Q. eds., Milton and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar

Egerton, D.R. (2009). Race and Slavery in the Era of Jefferson. In Shuffleton, F. ed., The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Jefferson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–82.Google Scholar

Eijnatten, J. van, and Lok, M. M., eds. (2018). The Global Counter Enlightenment. Themed issue of the Journal for History. Culture and Modernity, 6(1).Google Scholar

Estlund, D. (2008). Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Fallon, S. M. (1991). Milton among the Philosophers: Poetry and Materialism in Seventeenth-Century England. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Fatovic, C. (2004). Constitutionalism and Contingency: Locke’s Theory of Prerogative. History of Political Thought, 25(2), pp. 276–97.Google Scholar

Feldman, L. C. (2013). Lockean Prerogative: Productive Tensions. In Fatovic, C. and Kleinerman, B. A. eds., Extra-Legal Power and Legitimacy: Perspectives on Prerogative. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 75–93.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, J. (2001). Pettit’s Republic. The Monist, 84, pp. 77–97.Google Scholar

Filling, J. (2015). Liberty. In Gibbons, Michael ed., Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fink, Z. (1945). The Classical Republicans: An Essay in the Recovery of a Pattern of Thought in Seventeenth-Century England. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Finkelman, P. (2012). Slavery in the United States: Persons or Property? In Allain, J. ed., The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historical to the Contemporary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–34.Google Scholar

Forst, R. (2017). Noumenal Alienation: Rousseau, Kant and Marx on the Dialectics of Self-Determination. Kantian Review, 22(4), pp. 523–51.Google Scholar

Foxley, R. (2013). The Levellers: Radical Political Thought in the English Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, H. (1988). The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (2011). A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought. Ed. Long, A. A.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Furstenberg, F. (2003). Beyond Slavery and Freedom: Autonomy, Agency, and Resistance in Early American Political Discourse. The Journal of American History, 89(4), pp. 1295–1330.Google Scholar

Furstenberg, F. (2011). Atlantic Slavery, Atlantic Freedom: George Washington’s Library, Slavery, and Trans-Atlantic Abolitionist Networks. William and Mary Quarterly, 68, pp. 247–86.Google Scholar

Gädeke, D. (2017). Politik der Beherrschung: Eine kritische Theorie externer Demokratieförderung. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Gädeke, D. (2019). Does a Mugger Dominate? Episodic Power and the Structural Dimension of Domination. Journal of Political Philosophy. doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12202.Google Scholar

Gardiner, S. R. (2006). The Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution 1625–1660. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Garrigus, J. D. (2006). Before Haiti: Race and Citizenship in French Saint-Domingue. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Garsten, B. (2012). Liberalism and the Rhetorical Vision of Politics. Journal of the History of Ideas, 73(1), 83–93.Google Scholar

Geggus, D., ed. (2004), The Impact of the Haitian Revolution in the Atlantic World. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Geggus, D., (2014). The Haitian Revolution: A Documentary History. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Ghachem, M. W. (2012). The Old Regime and the Haitian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ghosh, E. (2008). From Republican to Liberal Liberty. History of Political Thought, 29, pp. 132–67.Google Scholar

Godechot, J. (1972). The Counter-Revolution: Doctrine and Action 1789–1804. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Goldie, M. (1993). Introduction. In Two Treatises of Government. London: Tuttle, pp. xv–xliii.Google Scholar

Goldie, M. (2021). John Locke and Empire. 2021 Carlyle Lectures.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, M. (2000). Republican Liberty Considered. History of Political Thought, 21, pp. 543–59.Google Scholar

Goodin, R. E. (2003). Folie Républicaine. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, pp. 55–76.Google Scholar

Goodin, R. E., and Jackson, F. (2007). Freedom from Fear. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35, pp. 249–65.Google Scholar

Gourevitch, A. (2011). Labor and Republican Liberty. Constellations, 18(3), pp. 431–54.Google Scholar

Gourevitch, A. (2013). Labor Republicanism and the Transformation of Work. Political Theory, 41(4), pp. 591–617.Google Scholar

Gourevitch, A. (2015). From Slavery to the Cooperative Commonwealth: Labor and Republican Liberty in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grant, R. (1987). John Locke’s Liberalism: A Study of Political Thought in Its Intellectual Setting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Green, F. (2012). Montaigne and the Life of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Green, K. (2012). When Is a Contract Theorist Not a Contract Theorist? Mary Astell and Catharine Macaulay as Critics of Thomas Hobbes. In Hirschmann, N. J. and Wright, J. H. eds., Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes. University Park: The Pennsylvania University Press, pp. 169–89.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (2008). On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grijzenhout, F. (1989). Feesten voor het vaderland. Patriotse en Bataafse feesten 1780–1806. Zwolle: Waanders.Google Scholar

Grofman, B., and Feld, S. (1988). Rousseau’s General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective. American Political Science Review, 82, pp. 567–76.Google Scholar

Gruppelaar, J., and Verwey, G., eds. (2010). D.V. Coornhert (1522–1590): Polemist and Vredezoeker. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Grześkowiak-Krwawicz, A. (2012). Queen Liberty: The Concept of Freedom in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Gutwirth, M. (2004). Suzanne Necker’s Legacy: Breastfeeding as Metonym in Germaine de Stael’s Delphine. Eighteenth-Century Life, 28(2), pp. 17–40.Google Scholar

Guyatt, N. (2016). Bind Us Apart: How Enlightened Americans Invented Racial Segregation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haan, I. de, and Lok, M. M., eds. (2019). The Politics of Moderation in Modern European History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Halldenius, L. (2003). Locke and the Non-Arbitrary. European Journal of Political Theory, 2(3), pp. 261–279.Google Scholar

Halldenius, L. (2007). The Primacy of Right. On the Triad of Liberty, Equality and Virtue in Wollstonecraft’s Political Thought. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15(1), pp. 75–99.Google Scholar

Halldenius, L. (2015). Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism: Independence, Rights and the Experience of Unfreedom. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar

Halldenius, L. (2016). Representation in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Political Philosophy. In Bergès, S. and Coffee, A. eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 166–82.Google Scholar

Halldenius, L. (2018). Filosofiska teorier om mänskliga rättigheter: en kritisk analys. In Arvidsson, M., Halldenius, L., and Sturfelt, L. eds. Mänskliga rättigheter i samhället. Malmö: Bokbox Förlag, pp. 35–54.Google Scholar

Hamel, C. (2013). The Republicanism of John Milton: Natural Rights, Civic Virtue, and the Dignity of Man. History of Political Thought, 34(1), pp. 35–65.Google Scholar

Hammersley, R. (2005). Jean-Paul Marat’s The Chains of Slavery in Britain and France, 1774–1833. The Historical Journal, 48, pp. 641–60.Google Scholar

Hammersley, R. (2010). The English Republican Tradition and Eighteenth-Century France: Between the Ancients and the Moderns. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Hammersley, R. (2019). James Harrington: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hammond, P. (2014). Milton and the People. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hammond, J. C., and Mason, M., eds. (2011). Contesting Slavery: The Politics of Bondage and Freedom in the New American Nation. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar

Hampsher-Monk, I. (1998). Review of Liberty before Liberalism. The Historical Journal, 41(4), pp. 1183–87.Google Scholar

Hampsher-Monk, I. (2013). Liberty and Citizenship in Early Modern English Political Discourse. In Skinner, Q. and van Gelderen, M. eds., Freedom and the Construction of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vol ii, pp. 105–27Google Scholar

Hankins, J. (2010). Exclusivist Republicanism and the Non-monarchical Republic. Political Theory, 38(4), pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Harris, L. M. (2004). In the Shadow of Slavery: African Americans in New York City, 1626–1863. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Hausknecht, G. (2004). The Gender of Civic Virtue. In Martin, C. G. ed., Milton and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–33.Google Scholar

Havrda, M. (2011). Grace and Free Will according to Clement of Alexandria. Journal of Early Christian Studies, 19(1), pp. 21–48.Google Scholar

Hirschmann, N. (2002). The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, K., and Skinner, Q. (2018). The Liberties of the Ancients. History of European Ideas, 44, pp. 812–25.Google Scholar

Holmes, S. (1993). The Anatomy of Antiliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Honohan, I. (2002). Civic Republicanism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hoye, J. M., and , J. M. (2014). Surveillance, Freedom and the Republic. European Journal of Political Theory, 17, pp. 343–63.Google Scholar

Hunt, L. (2007). Inventing Human Rights. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Israel, J. (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ivison, D. (2010). Republican Human Rights? European Journal of Political Theory, 9(1), pp. 31–47.Google Scholar

Jablonski, S. (1997). Ham’s Vicious Race: Slavery and John Milton. Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 37(1), pp. 173–90.Google Scholar

Jackson, M. (2009). Let This Voice Be Heard: Anthony Benezet, Father of Atlantic Abolitionism. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobus, M. (1992). Incorruptible Milk: Breastfeeding and the French Revolution. In Melzer, S. and Rabine, L. eds., Rebel Daughters: Women and the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 54–75.Google Scholar

Jainchill, A. (2008 ). Reimagining Politics after Terror: The Republican Origins of French Liberalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

James, D. (2017). The Compatibility of Freedom and Necessity in Marx’s Idea of Communist Society. European Journal of Philosophy, 25(2), pp. 270–93.Google Scholar

James, S. (1997). Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, S. (2008). Democracy and the Good Life in Spinoza’s Philosophy. In Huenemann, Charlie ed., Interpreting Spinoza: Critical essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 128–46.Google Scholar

James, S. (2012). Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics: The Theologico-Political Treatise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, M. (2010), Revolutionary Exiles. The American Loyalist and the French Émigré Diasporas. In Armitage, D. and Subrahmanyam, S. eds., The Age of Revolution in a Global Context, ca. 1760–1840. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar

Jordan, W. (1968). White over Black: American Attitudes toward the Negro, 1550–1812. Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press.Google Scholar

Judge, J. (2016). ‘Qu’allons-nous devenir?’ Belgian National Identity in the Age of Revolution. In Jensen, L. ed., The Roots of Nationalism: National Identity Formation in Early Modern Europe, 1600–1815. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 291–307.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, A., and Katznelson, I. (2008). Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kandiyali, J. (2014). Freedom and Necessity in Marx’s Account of Communism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22(1), pp. 104–23.Google Scholar

Kandiyali, J. (2020). The Importance of Others: Marx on Unalienated Production. Ethics, 130(4), pp. 555–87.Google Scholar

Kapust, D. (2004). Skinner, Pettit and Livy: The Conflict of the Orders and the Ambiguity of Republican Liberty. History of Political Thought, 25, pp. 377–401.Google Scholar

Kelly, D. (2010). The Propriety of Liberty: Persons, Passions, and Judgement in Modern Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, A. (1979). Aristotle’s Theory of the Will. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Kloppenberg, J. (1987). The Virtues of Liberalism: Christianity, Republicanism, and Ethics in Early American Political Discourse. The Journal of American History, 74, pp. 9–33.Google Scholar

Koekkoek, R. (2010). Eene waare en vrije Republiek. Jan Konijnenburg, De republikein en de uitvinding van de moderne republiek. De achttiende eeuw, 42, pp. 236–60.Google Scholar

Koekkoek, R. (2019a). The Citizenship Experiment: Contesting the Limits of Civic Equality and Participation in the Age of Revolutions. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Koekkoek, R. (2019b). Envisioning the Dutch Imperial Nation-State in the Age of Revolutions. In Koekkoek, René, Weststeijn, Arthur, and Richard, Anne-Isabelle eds., The Dutch Empire between Ideas and Practice, 1600–2000. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolodny, N. (2019). Being under the Power of Others. In Elazar, Y. and Rousselière, G. eds., Republicanism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 94–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, M. H. (2003). The Quality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kramer, M. H. (2008). Liberty and Domination. In Laborde, Cécile and Maynor, John eds., Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar

Krause, S. R. (2013). Beyond Non-domination: Agency, Inequality and the Meaning of Freedom. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 39, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar

Laborde, C. (2010). Republicanism and Global Justice: A Sketch. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(1), pp. 48–69.Google Scholar

Laborde, C. (2013). Republicanism. In Freeden, M. and Stears, M. eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 513–35.Google Scholar

Laborde, C., and Maynor, J. (2008). Republicanism and Political Theory. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Laborde, C., and Ronzoni, M. (2016). What Is a Free State? Republican Internationalism and Globalisation. Political Studies, 64, pp. 279–96.Google Scholar

LaBreche, B. (2010). Espousing Liberty: The Gender of Liberalism and the Politics of Miltonic Divorce. ELH, 77(4), pp. 969–94.Google Scholar

Lacour-Gayet, R. (1963). Calonne: Financier, Reformateur, Contre-révolutionnaire (1734–1802). Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar

Landemore, H. (2013). Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Larkin, H. (2014). The Making of Englishmen: Debates on National Identity 1550–1650. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Larmore, C. (2001). A Critique of Philip Pettit’s Republicanism. Philosophical Issues, 11, pp. 229–43.Google Scholar

Lee, D. (2011). Popular Liberty, Princely Government, and the Roman Law in Hugo Grotius’s De Jure Belli ac Pacis. Journal of the History of Ideas, 72(3), pp. 371–92.Google Scholar

Leipold, B. (2020). Marx’s Social Republic: Radical Republicanism and the Political Institutions of Socialism. In Leipold, B., Nabulsi, K., and White, S. eds., Radical Republicanism: Recovering the Tradition’s Popular Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 172–93.Google Scholar

Leipold, B., Nabulsi, K., and White, S., eds. (2020). Radical Republicanism: Recovering the Tradition’s Popular Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leopold, D. (2007). The Young Karl Marx: German Philosophy, Modern Politics, and Human Flourishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leopold, D. (2016). On Marxian Utopophobia. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 54(1), pp. 111–34.Google Scholar

List, C., and Valentini, L. (2016). Freedom as Independence. Ethics, 126(4), pp. 1043–74.Google Scholar

Lippert-Rasmussen, K. 2018. Relational Egalitarianism: Living as Equals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lok, M. M. (2019), ‘The Extremes Set the Tone’: Counter-Revolutionary Moderation in Continental Conservatism (ca. 1795–1835). In Haan, I. de and Lok, M. eds., The Politics of Moderation in Modern European History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 67–88.Google Scholar

Lok, M. M., Pestel, F., and Reboul, J. (2021 ). Conservative Cosmopolitanism Countering Revolution in Transnational Networks, Ideas and Movements (c. 1700‒1930). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Lovett, F. (2010). A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovett, F. (2018). Non-Domination. In Schmidtz, D. and Pavel, C. E. eds., The Oxford Handbook of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 106–23.Google Scholar

Lovett, F., and Pettit, P. (2019). Preserving Republican Freedom: A Reply to Simpson. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 47, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Luis, J. P., and Artola Renedo, A., eds. (2016). Transfert Culturels et politiques entre révolution et contre-révolution en Europe (1789–1840), Siècles, 43.Google Scholar

MacCallum, G. (1972). Negative and Positive Freedom. In Laslett, P., Runciman, W. G., and Skinner, Q. eds., Philosophy, Politics and Society. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 174–93.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, C. (2016). Mary Wollstonecraft: An Early Relational Autonomy Theorist? In Berges, S. and Coffee, A. eds., The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67–91.Google Scholar

Maddox, G. (2002). The Limits of Neo-Roman Liberty. History of Political Thought, 23, pp. 418–31.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. (2002). Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mali, J., Wokler, R., ed. (2003). Isaiah Berlin’s Counter-Enlightenment. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar

Martin, J. C. (1998 ). Contrerévolution, Révolution et Nation en France (1789–1799). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Martin, J. C. ed. (2001). La Contre-Révolution en Europe. XVIIIe-XIX siècles. Réalités politiques et sociales, résonances culturelles et idéologiques Rennes: Presses Universitaires Rennes.Google Scholar

Masseau, D. (2000). Les ennemis des Philosophes. L’Antiphilosophie au temps des Lumières. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar

Masseau, D. (2017). Dictionnaire des anti-lumières et antiphilosophes (France, 1715–1815). Paris: Champion.Google Scholar

Maynor, J. (2003). Republicanism in the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCammon, C. (2015). Domination: A Rethinking. Ethics, 125, pp. 1028–52.Google Scholar

McColley, D. (1994). Beneficent Hierarchies: Reading Milton Greenly. In Durham, C. W. and McColgan, K. P. eds., Spokesperson Milton: Voices in Contemporary Criticism. London and Toronto: Associated University Presses, pp. 231–48.Google Scholar

McCormick, J. (2003). Machiavelli against Republicanism: On the Cambridge School’s ‘Guicciardinian Moments’. Political Theory, 31(5), pp. 615–43.Google Scholar

McCormick, J. (2007). Rousseau’s Rome and the Repudiation of Populist Republicanism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP) 10, pp. 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMahon, D. M. (2001). Enemies of the Enlightenment: The French Counter-Enlightenment and the Making of Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McPhee, P. (2016). Liberty or Death: The French Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mendle, M. (1995). Henry Parker and the English Civil War: The Political Thought of the Public’s ‘privado’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Molhuysen, P. C., ed. (1928). Briefwisseling van Hugo Grotius. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Monnier, R. (2006). Républicanisme, Patriotisme et Révolution française. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Moyn, S. (2010). The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Muldoon, J. (2019). A Socialist Republican Theory of Freedom and Government. European Journal of Political Theory. doi.org/10.1177/1474885119847606.Google Scholar

Myers, B. (2006). Milton’s Theology of Freedom. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Nedelsky, J. (1989). Reconceiving Autonomy. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 1, pp. 7–35.Google Scholar

Nellen, H. (2014). Hugo Grotius: A Lifelong Struggle for Peace in Church and State, 1583–1645. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Nelson, E. (2004). The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, E. (2005). Liberty: One Concept Too Many? Political Theory, 33(1), pp. 58–78.Google Scholar

Nelson, E. (2007). ‘Talmudical Commonwealthsmen’ and the Rise of Republican Exclusivism. The Historical Journal, 50(4), pp. 809–35.Google Scholar

Nelson, E. (2019). The Theology of Liberalism: Political Philosophy and the Justice of God. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nickel, J. W. (2008). Rethinking Indivisibility: Towards a Theory of Supporting Relations between Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 30, pp. 984–1001.Google Scholar

Nielsen, K. M (2011). Deliberation as Inquiry: Aristotle’s Alternative to the Presumption of Open Alternatives. The Philosophical Review, 120(3), pp. 383–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nyquist, M. (1987). The Genesis of Gendered Subjectivity in the Divorce Tracts and in Paradise Lost. In Nyquist, M. and Ferguson, M. W. eds., Remembering Milton: Essays on the Texts and Traditions. New York and London: Methuen, pp. 99–127.Google Scholar

Nyquist, M. (2008). Slavery, Resistance, and Nation in Milton and Locke. In Loewenstein, D. and Stevens, P. eds., Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 356–97.Google Scholar

O’Shea, T. (2020). Socialist Republicanism. Political Theory, 48(5), pp. 548–572.Google Scholar

Pateman, C. (1980). ‘The Disorder of Women’: Women, Love and the Sense of Justice. Ethics, 91(1), pp. 20–34.Google Scholar

Pateman, C. (1992). Equality, Difference, Subordination: The Politics of Motherhood and Women’s Citizenship. In Block, G. and James, S. eds., Beyond Equality and Difference: Citizenship, Feminist Politics and Female Subjectivity. London: Routledge, pp. 17–31.Google Scholar

Pattanaik, P., and Xu, Y. (2015). Freedom and Its Value. In Hirose, Iwao and Olson, Jonas eds., The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 356–77.Google Scholar

Patten, A. (1996). The Republican Critique of Liberalism. British Journal of Political Science, 26, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar

Persky, J. (1998). Wage Slavery. History of Political Economy, 30 (4), pp. 627–51.Google Scholar

Pestel, F. (2015). Kosmopoliten wider Willen: Die Monarchiens als Revolutionsemigranten. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (1992). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (2002). Keeping Republicanism Simple: On a Difference with Quentin Skinner. Political Theory, 30(3), pp. 339–56.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (2007). Free Persons and Free Choices. History of Political Thought, 28, pp. 709–18.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (2008a). The Basic Liberties. In Kramer, Matthew and Grant, Claire eds., The Legacy of H. L. A. Hart: Legal, Political and Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–24.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (2008b). Freedom and Probability: A Comment on Goodin and Jackson. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36, pp. 206–20.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (2008c). Republican Freedom: Three Axioms, Four Theorems. In Laborde, Cécile and Maynor, John eds., Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 102–30.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (2012). On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (2013). Two Republican Traditions. In Niederberger, Andreas and Schink, Philipp eds., Republican Democracy: Liberty, Law and Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 169–204.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (2014). Just Freedom: A Moral Compass for a Complex World. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (2015a). The Republican Law of Peoples: A Restatement. In Buckinx, B., Trejo-Mathys, J., and Waligore, T. eds., Domination and Global Political Justice. Abindgon: Routledge, pp. 37–70.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. (2015b). The Robust Demands of the Good: Ethics with Attachment, Virtue, and Respect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Phillips, A. (2000). Feminism and Republicanism: Is This a Plausible Alliance? Journal of Political Philosophy, 8, pp. 279–93.Google Scholar

Pickett, K., and Wilkinson, R. (2009). The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Piketty, T. (2013). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. (1960). Burke and the Ancient Constitution – a Problem in the History of Ideas. The Historical Journal, 3(2), pp. 125–43.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. (1987). The Concept of a Language and the metier d’historien: Some Considerations on Practice. In Pagden, A. ed., The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. (2006). Foundations and Moments. In Brett, Annabel and Tully, James eds., Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. (2016). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition, with a new Foreword by Richard Whatmore. Princeton Classics Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pogge, T. (2002). World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Pollard, S. (1963). Factory Discipline in the Industrial Revolution. The Economic History Review, 16(2), pp. 254–71.Google Scholar

Popkin, J. (1989). Journals: The New Face of News. In Darnton, R. and Roche, D. eds., Revolution in Print: The Press in France, 1775–1800. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 141–64.Google Scholar

Popkin, J. (2010). You Are All Free: The Haitian Revolution and the Abolition of Slavery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Prak, M. (2018). Citizens without Nations: Urban Citizenship in Europe and the World, c. 1000–1789. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Prokhovnik, R. (2004). Spinoza and Dutch Republicanism. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Putterman, E. (2010). Rousseau, Law and the Sovereignty of the People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Quiggin, J. (2015). John Locke against Freedom. Jacobin. www.jacobinmag.com/2015/06/locke-treatise-slavery-private-property.Google Scholar

Rahe, P. (2000). Quentin Skinner’s ‘Third Way’. The Review of Politics, 62(2), 395–98Google Scholar

Rahe, P. (2008). Against Throne and Altar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rahman, K. S. (2017). Democracy against Domination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rakove, J. N. (1998 ). Declaring Rights: A Brief History with Documents. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar

Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John (2000). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Ed. Herman, Barbara. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John (2001). John Rawls: Collected Papers. Ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, John (2009). A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin & Faith. Ed. Nagel, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Raymond, J. (2010). Milton’s Angels: The Early-Modern Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ripstein, A. (2009). Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Riquet, M. (1989). Augustin de Barruel. Un jésuite face aux Jacobins francs-maçons 1741–1820. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar

Robbins, C. (1956). The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman: Studies in the Transmission, Development and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the Thirteen Colonies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, W. C. (2017). Marx’s Inferno: The Political Theory of Capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rodger, A. (1972). Owners and Neighbours in Roman Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rogers, M. L. (2020). Race, Domination, and Republicanism. In Allen, D. and Somanathan, R. eds., Difference without Domination: Pursuing Justice in Diverse Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 59–92.Google Scholar

Rogers, M. L. (forthcoming). The Darkened Light of Faith: Race, Democracy, and Freedom in African American Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Roobol, M. (2005). Landszaken. De godsdienstgesprekken tussen gereformeerde predikanten en D.V. Coornhert onder leiding van de Staten van Holland (1577–1583), PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Rosdolsky, R. (1977). The Making of Marx’s ‘Capital’. Trans. Burgess, P.. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Rosen, M. (1988–89). Kant’s Anti-Determinism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 89, pp. 125–41.Google Scholar

Rosen, M. (2012). Dignity: Its Meaning and History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rosen, M. (forthcoming). The Shadow of God: History and Freedom in German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rosenblatt, H. (1997). Rousseau and Geneva: From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosendaal, J. (2003). Bataven! Nederlandse vluchtelingen in Frankrijk 1787–1795. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar

Schwartzberg, M. (2008). Voting the General Will: Rousseau on Decision Rules. Political Theory, 36, pp. 403–23.Google Scholar

Scott, J. (2005). Commonwealth Principles: Republican Writing of the English Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, M. M. (2012). Journey Back to God: Origin on the Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sechler, M. J., and Greenberg, J. (2012). ‘There is Scarce a Pamphlet That Does Not Triumph in Bracton’: The Role of the De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae in Stuart Political Thought. History of Political Thought, 33, pp. 25–54.Google Scholar

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sen, A. (2004). Elements of a Theory of Human Rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(4), pp. 315–56.Google Scholar

Shue, H. (1996). Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), pp. 3–53.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (1983). Machiavelli on the Maintenance of Liberty. Politics, 18(2), 3–15.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (1984a). The Idea of Negative Liberty: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. In Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B., and Skinner, Q. eds., Philosophy in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193–221.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (1984b). The Paradoxes of Political Liberty, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Harvard University, 24 and 25 October, pp. 227–50.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (1986). The Paradoxes of Political Liberty. In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. vii. Ed. McMurrin, S. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–50.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (1990). The Republican Ideal of Political Liberty. In Bock, G., Skinner, Q., and Viroli, M. eds., Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–41.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (1992a). On Justice, the Common Good and the Priority of Liberty. In Mouffe, C. ed., Dimensions of Radical Democracy. London: Verso, pp. 211–24.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (1992b). Les idées républicains de liberté et de citoyenneté. Rue Descartes, 3, pp. 125–44.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2000). John Milton and the Politics of Slavery. Prose Studies, 23(1), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2002a). Classical Liberty, Renaissance Translation, and the English Civil War. In Renaissance Virtues, vol. ii of Visions of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 308–43.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2002b). The Idea of Negative Liberty: Machiavellian and Modern Perspectives. In Renaissance Virtues, vol. ii of Visions of Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 186–212.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2002c). Interpretation and the Understanding of Speech Acts. In Regarding Method, vol. i of Visions of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–27.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2002d). A Third Concept of Liberty. Proceedings of the British Academy, 117, pp. 237–69.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2003). States and the Freedom of Citizens. In Skinner, Q. and Sträth, B. eds., States and Citizens: History, Theory, Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–27.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2006a). Rethinking Political Liberty in the English Revolution. History Workshop Journal, 61, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2006b). Surveying the Foundations: A Retrospect and a Reassessment. In Brett, A. and Tully, J. with Hamilton-Bleakley, H. eds., Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236–61.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2008a). Freedom as the Absence of Arbitrary Power. In Laborde, C. and Maynor, J. eds., Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 83–101.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2008b). Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2009a). Repenser la liberté politique. Raisons politiques, 36, pp. 109–30.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2009b). On Trusting the Judgement of Our Rulers. In Bourke, R. and Geuss, R. eds., Political Judgement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–30.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2010). On the Slogans of Republican Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 9, pp. 95–102.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2012). On the Liberty of the Ancients and the Moderns: A Reply to My Critics. In Symposium: On Quentin Skinner, from Method to Politics. Journal of the History of Ideas, 73, pp. 127–46.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2013). Liberty before Liberalism and All That. 3:AM Magazine, 18 February 2013. www.3ammagazine.com/3am/liberty-before-liberalism-all-that/.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q. (2018). From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q., and Gelderen, M. van (2002). Introduction. In Skinner, Q. and van Gelderen, M. eds. Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Skinner, Q., and Gelderen, M. van eds. (2013). Freedom and the Construction of Europe, vol. II. Free Persons and Free States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sommerville, M. R. (1995). Sex and Subjection: Attitudes to Women in Early-Modern Society. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Sonenscher, M. (2009). Before the Deluge Public Debt, Inequality, and the Intellectual Origins of the French Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (2017). Freedom and Will: Graeco-Roman Origins. In Seaford, R., Wilkins, J., and Wright, M. eds., Selfhood and the Soul: Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 49–66.Google Scholar

Spector, H. (2010). Four Conceptions of Freedom. Political Theory, 38(6), pp. 780–808.Google Scholar

Sperber, J. (2013). Karl Marx: A Nineteenth-Century Life. New York: Liveright Publishing.Google Scholar

Sprunck, A. (1947). François-Xavier de Feller, 1735–1802. In Mersch, J. ed., Biographie nationale du Pays de Luxembourg depuis ses origines jusqu’à nos jours. Luxembourg: Victor Buck, pp. 123–254.Google Scholar