Book contents
- Rethinking Death in and after Heidegger
- Rethinking Death in and after Heidegger
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- A Note on the Notes (da capo)
- Abbreviations Used for Works by Heidegger
- Part I Rethinking Death in Heidegger
- Part II Rethinking Death after Heidegger
- 5 White’s Time and Death
- 6 Rethinking Levinas on Heidegger on Death
- 7 Critical Afterlives of Heidegger’s Phenomenology of Existential Death in Sartre, Beauvoir, Levinas, Agamben, and Derrida
- 8 Heidegger’s Mortal Phenomenology of Existential Death and the Postmetaphysical Politics of Ontological Pluralism
- 9 Why It Is Better for a Dasein Not to Live Forever, or Being Pro-Choice on the Immortality Question
- 10 Concluding Recapitulations
- References
- Index
6 - Rethinking Levinas on Heidegger on Death
from Part II - Rethinking Death after Heidegger
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2024
- Rethinking Death in and after Heidegger
- Rethinking Death in and after Heidegger
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- A Note on the Notes (da capo)
- Abbreviations Used for Works by Heidegger
- Part I Rethinking Death in Heidegger
- Part II Rethinking Death after Heidegger
- 5 White’s Time and Death
- 6 Rethinking Levinas on Heidegger on Death
- 7 Critical Afterlives of Heidegger’s Phenomenology of Existential Death in Sartre, Beauvoir, Levinas, Agamben, and Derrida
- 8 Heidegger’s Mortal Phenomenology of Existential Death and the Postmetaphysical Politics of Ontological Pluralism
- 9 Why It Is Better for a Dasein Not to Live Forever, or Being Pro-Choice on the Immortality Question
- 10 Concluding Recapitulations
- References
- Index
Summary
What are the basic coordinates of the dispute between Heidegger and Levinas over the phenomenology of “death” and its larger ontological or ethical significance? Or, put in the “perfectionist” terms developed in Chapter 4, in what ways do Heidegger and Levinas disagree about how we human beings become genuinely or fully ourselves? Examining the convergences and divergences of Heidegger’s and Levinas’s phenomenologies of death, this chapter suggests that Heidegger and Levinas both understood themselves as struggling to articulate the requisite ethical response to the great traumas of the twentieth century. By comparing their thinking at this level, I contend, we can better understand the ways in which Levinas genuinely diverges from Heidegger even while building critically on his thinking.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rethinking Death in and after Heidegger , pp. 181 - 207Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024