Abbott, Suzanne and McConkey, Roy, ‘The barriers to social inclusion as perceived by people with intellectual disabilities’ (2006) 10 Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 275–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adams-Spink, Geoff, ‘Social Model Animation’, available at youtu.be/9s3NZaLhcc4 (uploaded 7 November 2011)Google Scholar

‘Adult ward should have right to vote: court’, The Japan Times, 14 March 2013, available at www.japantimes.co.jpGoogle Scholar

Aldridge, Jo, ‘Picture this: the use of participatory photographic research methods with people with learning disabilities’ (2007) 22 Disability & Society 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alkire, Sabina, ‘Dimensions of human development’ (2002) 30 World Development 181–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM–5, 5th edn (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anscombe, Gertrude E.M., Intention (Oxford: Blackwell, 1957)Google Scholar

Aristotle, , The Eudemian Ethics, Kenny, Anthony tr. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arstein-Kerslake, Anna, ‘An empowering dependency: exploring support for the exercise of legal capacity’ (2016) 18 Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arstein-Kerslake, Anna, ‘Challenging the foundations of mental health law’ (2015) 128 Precedent 32–6Google Scholar

Arstein-Kerslake, Anna and Flynn, Eilionóir, ‘The General Comment on Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: a roadmap for equality before the law’ (2016) 20 The International Journal of Human Rights 471–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arstein-Kerslake, Anna and Flynn, Eilionóir, ‘The right to legal agency: domination, disability, and the protections of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ (2017) 13(1) International Journal of Law in Context 22–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashton, Gordon, Letts, Penny, Marin, Marc, Terrell, Martin, Keene, Alex Ruck, Ward, Adrian D., Frimston, Richard and van Overdijk, Claire, Court of Protection Practice 2012 (Bristol: Jordan Publishing Limited, 2012)Google Scholar

Australian Law Reform Commission, ‘Equality, Capacity and Disability in Commonwealth Laws’, Discussion Paper 81 (May 2014)Google Scholar

Australian Law Reform Commission, ‘Equality, Capacity and Disability in Commonwealth Laws’, Final Report No. 124 (2014)Google Scholar

Bach, Michael and Kerzner, Lana, ‘A new paradigm for protecting autonomy and the right to legal capacity: advancing substantive equality for persons with disabilities through law, policy and practice’, Commissioned Paper, Law Commission of Ontario (October 2010)Google Scholar

Baldry, Eileen, Clarence, Melissa, Dowse, Leanne and Trollor, Julian, ‘Reducing vulnerability to harm in adults with cognitive disabilities in the Australian criminal justice system’ (2013) 10 Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 222–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldry, Eileen, Dowse, Leanne, Snoyman, Phillip, Clarence, Melissa and Webster, Ian, ‘A critical perspective on mental health disorders and cognitive disability in the criminal justice system’, in Cunneen, C. and Salter, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2008 Critical Criminology Conference (University of New South Wales, 2008)Google Scholar

Barken, Rachel, ‘A place to call home: intellectual disabilities and residential services in Nova Scotia’ (2013) 2 Canadian Journal of Disability Studies 51–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Colin, Oliver, Mike and Barton, Len, Disability Studies Today (Cambridge: Polity, 2002)Google Scholar

Barnes, Colin, ‘What a difference a decade makes: reflections on doing “emancipatory” disability research’ (2003) 18 Disability & Society 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baroff, George S., ‘Eugenics, “Baby Doe”, and Peter Singer: toward a more “perfect” society’ (2000) 38 Mental Retardation 73–72.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barzilai, Gad, Communities and Law: Politics and Cultures of Legal Identities (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, Peter and Davis, Fabian A., ‘Social capital, social inclusion and services for people with learning disabilities’ (2004) 19 Disability and Society 195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beetham, David, ‘What future for economic and social rights?’ (1995) 43 Political Studies 41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Befort, Stephen F. and Donesky, Tracey Holmes, ‘Reassignment under the Americans with Disabilities Act: reasonable accommodation, affirmative action, or both?’ (2000) 57 Washington and Lee Law Review 1045–94Google Scholar

Ben-Moshe, Liat, Chapman, Chris and Carey, Allison C. (eds.), Disability Incarcerated: Imprisonment and Disability in the United States and Canada (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (London, 1789)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah, Liberty, Hardy, Henry ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, first published 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigby, Christine, Know, M., Beadle-Brown, J., Clement, T. and Mansell, J., ‘Uncovering dimensions of culture in underperforming group homes for people with severe intellectual disability’ (2012) 50 Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 452–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Booth Glen, Kristin, ‘Changing paradigms: mental capacity, legal capacity, guardianship, and beyond’ (2012) 44 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 93–170Google Scholar

Bossuyt, Marc J., Guide to the ‘Travaux Préparatoires’ of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brammer, Alison, ‘Inside the Court of Protection’ (2012) 14 The Journal of Adult Protection 297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bratman, Michael E., Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bratman, Michael E., ‘What is intention?’ in Cohen, Philip R., Morgan, Jerry and Pollack, Martha E. (eds.), Intentions in Communication (Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1990) 15–31Google Scholar

Bridwell, Philip, ‘Philosophical dimensions of the doctrine of unconscionability’ (2003) 70 The University of Chicago Law Review 1513–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Briggs, Herbert W., ‘The Travaux Préparatoires of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1971) 65 The American Journal of International Law 705–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brisenden, Simon, ‘Independent living and the medical model of disability’ (1986) 1 Disability, Handicap & Society 173–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryan, Willie V., In Search of Freedom: How Persons with Disabilities Have Been Disenfranchised from the Mainstream of American Society and How the Search for Freedom Continues, 2nd edn (Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 2006)Google Scholar

Buergenthal, Thomas, ‘The normative and institutional evolution of international human rights’ (1997) 19 Human Rights Quarterly 703–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bulgarian Center for Not-for-Profit Law, ‘New “formula” for capacity to act: opportunity for everyone to exercise their rights—Statement on the paradigm shift of Article 12 of CRPD’, Position Paper (2014)Google Scholar

Bulgarian Center for Not-for-Profit Law, Supported Decision Making: Guidebook to Rights Enforcement (2014)Google Scholar

Burr, Vivien, Social Constructionism, 2nd edn (London: Routledge, 2003)Google Scholar

Cambridge Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities Research Group, ‘Draft General Comment on Article 12 of the Convention’, Submission to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (31 January 2014)Google Scholar

Canadian Association for Community Living, ‘Response to Draft General Comment No. 1 on Article 12: UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ (26 February 2014)Google Scholar

Carlson, Licia and Kittay, Eva Feder, ‘Introduction: rethinking philosophical presumptions in light of cognitive disability’, in Kittay, Eva Feder and Carlson, Licia (eds.), Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy (Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010) 1–25Google Scholar

Charlton, James I., Nothing about Us without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Christman, John, ‘Relational autonomy, liberal individualism, and the social constitution of selves’ (2004) 117 Philosophical Studies 143–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Philip R. and Levesque, Hector J., ‘Intention is choice with commitment’ (1990) 42 Artificial Intelligence 213–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘The right of people with disabilities to live independently and be included in the community’, CommDH/IssuePaper(2012)3 (13 March 2012)Google Scholar

Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘Who gets to decide? Right to legal capacity for persons with intellectual and psychosocial disabilities’, CommDH/IssuePaper(2012)2 (20 February 2012)Google Scholar

Common European Guidelines on the Transition from Institutional to Community-Based Care (European Expert Group on the Transition from Institutional to Community-Based Care, November 2012)Google Scholar

Conly, Sarah, Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google ScholarPubMed

Craigie, Jillian, ‘Against a singular understanding of legal capacity: criminal responsibility and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ (2015) 40 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 6–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Damasio, Antonio R., Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain (New York: Pantheon Books, 2010)Google Scholar

de Bhailís, Clíona and Flynn, Eilionóir, ‘State of the Art – Literature to Date on Article 12’ (2017) 13(1) International Journal of Law in Context 6–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, Edward L. and Ryan, Richard M., ‘The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior’ (2000) 11 Psychological Inquiry 227–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Degener, Theresia, ‘International disability law—A new legal subject on the rise: the Interregional Experts’ Meeting in Hong Kong, 13–17 December, 1999’ (2000) 18 Berkeley Journal of International Law 180–95Google Scholar

Delgado, Richard and Stefancic, Jean, Failed Revolutions: Social Reform and the Limits of Legal Imagination (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Dennis, Michael J. and Stewart, David P., ‘Justiciability of economic, social and cultural rights: should there be an international complaints mechanism to adjudicate the rights to food, water, housing, and health?’ (2004) 98 The American Journal of International Law 462–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Department for Constitutional Affairs, Mental Capacity Act 2005: Code of Practice (Norwich: The Stationery Office, 2007)Google Scholar

Department of Health Services, State of Wisconsin, Guardianship of Adults (June 2011)Google Scholar

Department of the Taoiseach, Programme for Government (2011–2016), available at www.taoiseach.gov.ie/eng/Work_Of_The_Department/Programme_for_Government/Google Scholar

‘Deprivation of voting rights found unconstitutional in Japan’, Inclusion International, 14 March 2013, available at http://inclusion-international.org/depriviation-of-voting-rights-found-unconstitutional-in-japan/Google Scholar

‘Desperate situation of the patients from the Poiana Mare Hospital’, The Southern Paper, 23 February 2004Google Scholar

Dhanda, Amita, ‘Legal capacity in the Disability Rights Convention: stranglehold of the past or lodestar for the future?’ (2007) 34 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 429–62Google Scholar

Dhanda, Amita, ‘Universal legal capacity as a universal human right’, in Dudley, Michael, Silove, Derrick and Gale, Fran (eds.), Mental Health and Human Rights: Vision, Praxis, and Courage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) 177–88Google Scholar

Dhanda, Amita and Gabor Gombos, ‘The National Trust for persons with autism, cerebral palsy, mental retardation and multiple disabilities’, Consultation Paper drafted under the auspices of the National Trust, Centre for Disability Studies, Nalsar University of Law, available at www.disabilitystudiesnalsar.org/nt.phpGoogle Scholar

Donnelly, Mary, ‘Best interests, patient participation and the Mental Capacity Act 2005’ (2009) 17 Medical Law Review 1–29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Donoghue, Christopher, ‘Challenging the authority of the medical definition of disability: an analysis of the resistance to the social constructionist paradigm’ (2003) 18 Disability & Society 199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doron, Israel, ‘Elder guardianship kaleidoscope – a comparative perspective’ (2002) 16 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 368–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doyle, Suzanne and Flynn, Eilionóir, ‘Ireland’s ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: challenges and opportunities’ (2013) 41 British Journal of Learning Disabilities 171–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DuBois, Ellen Carol, Feminism and Suffrage: The Emergence of an Independent Women’s Movement in America, 1848–1869 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, Michael C., Clare, Isabel C.H., Holland, Anthony J. and Gunn, Michael J., ‘Constructing and reconstructing “best interests”: an interpretative examination of substitute decision‐making under the Mental Capacity Act 2005’ (2007) 29 Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law 117–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Edwards, J. LI. J., ‘Automatism and criminal responsibility’ (1958) 21 The Modern Law Review 375–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eide, Asbjørn, ‘Economic, social, and cultural rights as human rights’, in Eide, Asbjørn, Krause, Catarina and Rosas, Allan (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook, 2nd rev edn (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001) 9–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

E-mail received by author from Kicki Nordström, Ombudsman, Synskadades Riksförbund (SRF), 22 July 2009Google Scholar

‘Essential principles: Irish legal capacity law’ (April 2012), available at www.amnesty.ie/reports/essential-principles-irish-legal-capacity-lawGoogle Scholar

‘European Court of Human Rights upholds the right to vote of persons with disabilities’, Mental Disability Advocacy Centre, 20 May 2010Google Scholar

Flynn, Eilionóir, ‘Ireland’s compliance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: towards a rights-based approach for legal reform’ (2009) 31 Dublin University Law Journal 357–85Google Scholar

Flynn, Eilionóir and Arstein-Kerslake, Anna, ‘Legislating personhood: realising the right to support in exercising legal capacity’ (2014a) 10 International Journal of Law in Context 81–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flynn, Eilionóir and Arstein-Kerslake, Anna, ‘The support model of legal capacity: fact, fiction, or fantasy?’ (2014b) 32 Berkeley Journal of International Law 124–43Google Scholar

Forrester‐Jones, Rachel, Carpenter, John and Coolen-Schrijner, Pauline, ‘The social networks of people with intellectual disability living in the community 12 years after resettlement from long‐stay hospitals’ (2006) 19 Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 285–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Francis, Leslie Pickering and Silvers, Anita, ‘Liberalism and individually scripted ideas of the good: meeting the challenge of dependent agency’ (2007) 33 Social Theory and Practice 311–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankl, Victor E., Man’s Search for Meaning (Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Fraser, Steven (ed.), The Bell Curve Wars: Race, Intelligence, and the Future of America (New York: Basic Books, 1995)Google Scholar

Freeman, Marsha A., ‘Measuring equality: a comparative perspective on women’s legal capacity and constitutional rights in five Commonwealth countries’ (1989–1990) 5 Berkeley Women’s Law Journal 110–38Google Scholar

Frolik, Lawrence A., ‘Plenary guardianship: an analysis, a critique and a proposal for reform’ (1981) 23 Arizona Law Review 599–660Google Scholar

Garner, Bryan A. (ed.), Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th edn (St Paul, Minn.: West Group, 1999)Google Scholar

Geisinger, Alex and Stein, Michael Ashley, ‘Rational Choice, Reputation, and Human Rights Treaties’ (2008) 106 Michigan Law Review 1129–42Google Scholar

Gooding, Piers, ‘Navigating the “flashing amber lights” of the right to legal capacity in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: responding to major concerns’ (2015) 15 Human Rights Law Review 45–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gooding, Piers, ‘Supported decision-making: a rights-based disability concept and its implications for mental health law’ (2013) 20 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 431–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gooding, Piers, Arstein-Kerslake, Anna, Andrews, Louis and McSherry, Bernadette, ‘Addressing the indefinite detention of people with cognitive and psychiatric impairment due to unfitness to plead laws’, Melbourne Social Equity Institute (21 March 2016)Google Scholar

Gooding, Piers and O’Mahony, Charles, ‘Laws on unfitness to stand trial and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: comparing reform in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Australia’ (2016) 44 International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 122–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, Carol C., Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grear, Anna, ‘“Framing the project” of international human rights law: reflections on the dysfunctional “family” of the Universal Declaration’, in Gearty, Conor and Douzinas, Costas (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012) 17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffith, Gemma, Hutchinson, Lisa and Hastings, Richard P., ‘ “I’m not a patient, I’m a person”: the experiences of individuals with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour—a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies’ (2013) 20 Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 469–88Google Scholar

Hampshire, Adam, Highfield, Roger R., Parkin, Beth L. and Owen, Adrian M., ‘Fractionating human intelligence’ (2012) 76 Neuron 1225–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Handler, Joel F., Social Movements and the Legal System: A Theory of Law Reform and Social Change (New York: Academic Press, 1978)Google Scholar

Harman, Gilbert, ‘Human flourishing, ethics, and liberty’ (1983) 12 Philosophy & Public Affairs 307–22Google Scholar

Harrison, Brian, Separate Spheres: The Opposition to Women’s Suffrage in Britain (Abingdon: Routledge, 2012)Google Scholar

Hatton, Chris, Emerson, Eric, Robertson, Janet, Gregory, Nicky, Kessissoglou, Sophia and Walsh, Patricia Noonan, ‘The resident choice scale: a measure to assess opportunities for self‐determination in residential settings’ (2004) 48 Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 103–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, R., Redley, M. and Holland, A.J., ‘Duty of care and autonomy: how support workers managed the tension between protecting service users from risk and promoting their independence in a specialist group home’ (2011) 55 Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 873–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayes, Susan, Shacknell, Phil, Mottram, Pat and Lancaster, Rachel, ‘The prevalence of intellectual disability in a major UK prison’ (2007) 35 British Journal of Learning Disabilities 162–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Held, Virginia, Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Heller, Tamar, Miller, Alison B. and Factor, Alan, ‘Autonomy in residential facilities and community functioning of adults with mental retardation’ (1999) 37 Mental Retardation 449–572.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Herr, Stanley S., Gostin, Lawrence O. and Koh, Harold Hongju (eds.), The Human Rights of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan: A Critical Introduction, 2 vols., Shuhmann, Karl and Rogers, G.A.J. eds. (Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum, 2003, first published 1651)Google Scholar

Houses of the Oireachtas, ‘Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality continues hearings on proposed mental capacity legislation’ (Press Release, February 2012), available at www.oireachtas.ie/parliament/mediazone/pressreleases/2012/name-6931-en.htmlGoogle Scholar

Houses of the Oireachtas, Joint Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality, ‘Mental Capacity Legislation – Invitation for Submissions’ (August 2011), available at http://www.oireachtas.ie/parliament/mcl/Google Scholar

Houses of the Oireachtas, Joint Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality, Report on Hearings in Relation to the Scheme of the Mental Capacity Bill (May 2012)Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, ‘ “Like a death sentence”: abuses against persons with mental disabilities in Ghana’ (2 October 2012)Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, ‘Submission to the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities regarding Croatia’ (30 August 2014), available at www.hrw.org/news/2014/08/30/human-rights-watch-submission-united-nations-committee-rights-persons-disabilitiesGoogle Scholar

Ikäheimo, Heikki, ‘Personhood and the social inclusion of people with disabilities: a recognition-theoretical approach’, in Kristiansen, Kristjana, Vehmas, Simo and Shakespeare, Tom (eds.), Arguing about Disability: Philosophical Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2009) 77–92Google Scholar

Ilieva, Lucia, ‘The NGO role in advocacy for the human rights of people with disabilities in Bulgaria’, eumap.org, July 2006, available at www.opensocietyfoundations.orgGoogle Scholar

Interights, ‘The Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania’, available at www.interights.org/campeanu/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

International Law Association, Committee on International Human Rights Law and Practice, Final Report on the Impact of Findings of the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies (Berlin Conference, 2004)Google Scholar

Jaeger, Paul T., Disability and the Internet: Confronting a Digital Divide (Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2012)Google Scholar

Jhabvala, Farrokh, ‘Domestic implementation of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’ (1985) 32 Netherlands International Law Review 461–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, Sarah, Schultz, Jenny and Castan, Melissa, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Materials, and Commentary, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Judiciary of England and Wales, Court of Protection Report 2010 (2010)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, The Principles of Critical Philosophy (London, 1797)Google Scholar

Kanter, Arlene S., ‘There’s no place like home: the right to live in the community for people with disabilities, under international law and the domestic laws of the United States and Israel’ (2012) 45 Israel Law Review 181–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karlan, Pamela S. and Rutherglen, George, ‘Disabilities, discrimination, and reasonable accommodation’ (1996) 46 Duke Law Journal 1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kayess, Rosemary and French, Phillip, ‘Out of darkness into light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ (2008) 8 Human Rights Law Review 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, Brendan D., ‘The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill 2013: content, commentary, controversy’ (2015) 184 Irish Journal of Medical Science 31–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kerzner, Lana, ‘Paving the way to full realization of the CRPD’s rights to legal capacity and supported decision-making: a Canadian perspective’, In From the Margins: New Foundations for Personhood and Legal Capacity in the 21st Century—A Peter Wall Institute Exploratory Workshop (April 2011)Google Scholar

Keys, Mary, ‘Legal capacity law reform in Europe: an urgent challenge’, in Quinn, Gerard and Waddington, Lisa (eds.), European Yearbook of Disability Law (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2009), vol. 1, 59–88Google Scholar

Kittay, Eva Feder, Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency (New York: Routledge, 1999)Google Scholar

Kittay, Eva Feder and Carlson, Licia (eds.), Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy (Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knox, Lucy, Douglas, Jacinta M. and Bigby, Christine, ‘“The biggest thing is trying to live for two people”: spousal experiences of supporting decision-making participation for partners with TBI’ (2015) 29 Brain Injury 745–57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Knox, Lucy, Douglas, Jacinta M. and Bigby, Christine, ‘Whose decision is it anyway? How clinicians support decision-making participation after acquired brain injury’ (2013) 35 Disability and Rehabilitation 1926–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koestner, Richard, Ryan, R.M., Bernieri, Frank and Holt, Kathleen, ‘Setting limits on children’s behavior: the differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity’ (1984) 52 Journal of Personality 233–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozma, Agnes Mansell, J. and Beadle-Brown, J., ‘Outcomes in different residential settings for people with intellectual disability: a systematic review’ (2009) 114 American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 193–222CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Künnemann, Rolf, ‘A coherent approach to human rights’ (1995) 17 Human Rights Quarterly 323–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Law Society of Scotland, ‘Draft General Comment on Article 12 of the Convention: equal recognition before the law’, Submission to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (November 2013)Google Scholar

Lehrer, Jonah, How We Decide (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009)Google Scholar

Lewis, Oliver, ‘Advancing legal capacity jurisprudence’ [2011] (6) European Human Rights Law Review 700–14Google Scholar

‘Life story of Takumi Nagoya from Japan’, The Zero Project, 22 April 2015, available at http://zeroproject.org/life-story-of-takumi-nagoya-from-japan/Google Scholar

Lo, Bernard, ‘Assessing decision‐making capacity’ (1990) 18 Law, Medicine & Health Care 193–201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Locke, John, Second Treatise of Government (London, 1690)Google Scholar

Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government (London, 1713)Google Scholar

Locke, Steven S., ‘The incredible shrinking protected class: redefining the scope of disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act’ (1997) 68 University of Colorado Law Review 107–46Google Scholar

Loja, Ema, Costa, Maria Emília, Hughes, Bill and Menezes, Isabel, ‘Disability, embodiment and ableism: stories of resistance’ (2013) 28 Disability & Society 190–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lush, Denzil, Court of Protection (UK), ‘Mental Capacity Act – A new framework’, Law Gazette (Singapore), May 2010Google Scholar

Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie, ‘Introduction: autonomy refigured’, in Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie (eds.), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000) 3–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maine, Henry Sumner, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society, and Its Relation to Modern Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandell, David S., Wiggins, Lisa D., Carpenter, Laura Arnstein, Daniels, Julie, DiGuiseppi, Carolyn, Durkin, Maureen S., Giarelli, Ellen, Morrier, Michael J., Nicholas, Joyce S., Pinto-Martin, Jennifer A., Shattuck, Paul T., Thomas, Kathleen C., Yeargin-Allsopp, Marshalyn and Kirby, Russell S., ‘Racial/ethnic disparities in the identification of children with autism spectrum disorders’ (2009) 99 American Journal of Public Health 493–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mansell, Jim, ‘Deinstitutionalisation and community living: progress, problems and priorities’ (2006) 31 Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 65–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mansell, Jim, Knapp, Martin, Beadle-Brown, Julie and Beecham, Jeni, Deinstitutionalisation and Community Living – Outcomes and Costs: Report of a European Study (University of Kent, 2007), vol. 2Google Scholar

Mapulanga-Hulston, Jackbeth K., ‘Examining the justiciability of economic, social and cultural rights’ (2002) 6(4) The International Journal of Human Rights 29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marston, Greg and Watts, Rob, ‘“Just the facts ma’am”: a critical appraisal of evidence-based policy’ [2003] (30) Just Policy: A Journal of Australian Social Policy 32–46Google Scholar

Martin, Wayne and Michalowski, Sabine, ‘The legal status of general comments’, Research Note, Ministry of Justice/Essex Autonomy Project (23 May 2014), available at autonomy.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Legal-status-of-General-Comments-.pdfGoogle Scholar

Martin, Wayne, Michalowski, Sabine, Jütten, Timo and Burch, Matthew, ‘Achieving CRPD compliance: is the Mental Capacity Act of England and Wales compatible with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities? If not, what next?’, An Essex Autonomy Project Position Paper, Report submitted to the UK Ministry of Justice (22 September 2014)Google Scholar

Marx, Gary T. and Useem, Michael, Majority involvement in minority movements: civil rights, abolition, untouchability’ (1971) 27 Journal of Social Issues 81–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masi Doria, Carla, ‘Status and contract in ancient Rome: with some thoughts on the “future of obligations” ’, in McGinn, Thomas A.J. (ed.), Obligations in Roman Law: Past, Present, and Future (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2012) 102–30Google Scholar

McConkey, Roy, ‘Variations in the social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities in supported living schemes and residential settings’ (2007) 51 Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 201–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McKenzie, Karen, Murray, George C., Higgon, John and Matheson, Edith, ‘Knowledge of learning disabilities: the relationship with choice, duty of care and non-aversive approaches’ (1999) 3 Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 27–33Google Scholar

McSherry, Bernadette, ‘International trends in mental health laws: introduction’ (2008) 26 Law in Context 1–9Google Scholar

McSherry, Bernadette, ‘Legal capacity under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ (2012) 20 Journal of Law and Medicine 22–7Google ScholarPubMed

McSherry, Bernadette and Freckelton, Ian (eds.), Coercive Care: Rights, Law and Policy (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McSherry, Bernadette and Weller, Penelope (eds.), Rethinking Rights-Based Mental Health Laws (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar

McSherry, Bernadette and Wilson, Kay, ‘The concept of capacity in Australian mental health law reform: going in the wrong direction?’ 40 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 60–9Google Scholar

Mencap, Death by Indifference: 74 Deaths and Counting—A Progress Report 5 Years On (February 2012)Google Scholar

Mental Disability Advocacy Center, Guardianship and Human Rights in Hungary: Analysis of Law, Policy and Practice (2007)Google Scholar

Mental Disability Advocacy Center, Guardianship and Human Rights in Serbia: Analysis of Guardianship Law and Policy (2006)Google Scholar

Mental Hygiene Legal Service, SCPA Article 17-A and Related Matters: Collected Cases (26 April 2016)Google Scholar

Metzel, Deborah S. and Walker, Pamela M., ‘The illusion of inclusion: geographies of the lives of people with developmental disabilities in the United States’ (2001) 21 Disability Studies Quarterly 114–28Google Scholar

Milas Klarić, Ivana and Grđan, Kristijan, National Legislation and Article 12 of the UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Croatia Country Report: EU-PERSON (2014)Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty (London: Penguin Books, 2010, first published 1859)Google Scholar

Mills, Charles W., The Racial Contract (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Ministry of Justice, Memorandum to the Justice Select Committee: Post-Legislative Assessment of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, Cm 7955 (2010)Google Scholar

Minkowitz, Tina, ‘Abolishing mental health laws to comply with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, in McSherry, Bernadette and Weller, Penelope (eds.), Rethinking Rights-Based Mental Health Laws (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010) 151–77Google Scholar

Minkowitz, Tina, ‘The Paradigm of Supported Decision Making’, presentation available at http://nagano.dee.cc/tinalegal.htmGoogle Scholar

Minkowitz, Tina, ‘Rethinking criminal responsibility from a critical disability perspective: the abolition of insanity/incapacity acquittals and unfitness to plead, and beyond’ (2014) 23 Griffith Law Review 434–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minkowitz, Tina, ‘The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the right to be free from nonconsensual psychiatric interventions’ (2007) 34 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 405–28Google Scholar

Moller, Arlen C., Ryan, Richard M. and Deci, Edward L., ‘Self-determination theory and public policy: improving the quality of consumer decisions without using coercion’ (2006) 25 American Marketing Association 104–16Google Scholar

Morgan, Sarah L., ‘Do no harm: “best interests”, patients’ wishes and the Mental Capacity Act 2005’ (2013) 2 Manchester Student Law Review 224–39Google Scholar

Naci, Lorina and Owen, Adrian M., ‘Making every word count for nonresponsive patients’ (2013) 70 JAMA Neurology 1235–41Google ScholarPubMed

National Guardianship Network, ‘Third National Guardianship Summit: Releases Standards and Recommendations’ (October 2011)Google Scholar

Neier, Aryeh, ‘Social and economic rights: a critique’ (2006) 13(2)Human Rights Brief 1–3Google Scholar

‘New disability bill in monsoon session likely’, The Times of India, 28 March 2016, available at http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Google Scholar

Nicholson, Timothy R.J., Cutter, William and Hotopf, Matthew, ‘Assessing mental capacity: The Mental Capacity Act’ (2008) 336(7639) BMJ: British Medical Journal 322–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nind, Melanie, ‘Conducting qualitative research with people with learning, communication and other disabilities: methodological challenges’, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper NCRM/012 (November 2008)Google Scholar

Norris, Pippa, Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C., ‘The capabilities of people with cognitive disabilities’ (2009) 40 Metaphilosophy 331–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C., Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C., Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Office of the Public Advocate (South Australia), Annual Report 2011–2012 (2012)Google Scholar

Office of the Public Advocate (South Australia), South Australian Supported Decision Making Project Report of Preliminary ‘Phase I’: A Preliminary ‘In House’ Evaluation of the Process of Establishing Agreements (June 2011)Google Scholar

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), From Exclusion to Equality: Realizing the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2007)Google Scholar

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Getting a Life: Living Independently and Being Included in the Community—Legal Analysis of the Current Use and Future Potential of the EU Structural Funds to Contribute to the Achievement of Article 19 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (April 2012)Google Scholar

Oliver, Michael, The Politics of Disablement (London: Macmillan Education, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, Mike, ‘Changing the social relations of research production’ (1992) 7 Disability, Handicap & Society 101–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, Mike, ‘The social model of disability: thirty years on’ (2013) 28 Disability & Society 1024–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Shea, Tom, ‘Disability and domination: lessons from Republican political philosophy’ (August 2015) Journal of Applied Philosophy 1–16 at 4, doi: 10.1111/japp.12149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Sullivan, Janet and Hilliard, Jonathan, The Law of Contract, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Overboe, James, ‘“Difference in itself”: validating disabled people’s lived experiences’ (1999) 5 Body & Society 17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, Gareth S., Freyenhagen, Fabian, Richardson, Genevra and Hotopf, Matthew, ‘Mental capacity and decisional autonomy: an interdisciplinary challenge’ (2009) 52 Inquiry 79–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pateman, Carole, The Sexual Contract (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Patton, James M., ‘The disproportionate representation of African Americans in special education: looking behind the curtain for understanding and solutions’ (1998) 32 The Journal of Special Education 25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pawson, Ray, Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective (London: SAGE Publications, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penney, Darby J., ‘Choice, common sense, and responsibility: the system’s obligations to recipients’, in Sundram, Clarence J. (ed.), Choice and Responsibility: Legal and Ethical Dilemmas in Services for Persons with Mental Disabilities (New York: New York State Commission on Quality Care for the Mentally Disabled, 1994) 29–32Google Scholar

Perlin, Michael L., ‘The ADA and persons with mental disabilities: can sanist attitudes be undone’ (1993–1994) 8 Journal of Law and Health 15–45Google Scholar

Perlin, Michael L., ‘“God said to Abraham/Kill me a son”: why the insanity defense and the incompetency status are compatible with and required by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and basic principles of therapeutic jurisprudence’, NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper (11 November 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perlin, Michael L., ‘The insanity defense: nine myths that will not go away’, NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper (14 January 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘PERSON: Principles for Legal Capacity Law Reform’, available at www.eu-person.com/publication/person-principles-english/wppa_open/Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, David, ‘Overview of the disability movement: history, legislative record, and political implications’ (1993) 21 Policy Studies Journal 724–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pogge, Thomas W., ‘Human flourishing and universal justice’ (1999) 16 Social Philosophy and Policy 333–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

PO Skåne, ‘Swedish user-run service with personal ombud for psychiatric patients’ (copy on file with author)Google Scholar

Quinn, Gerard, ‘Personhood and legal capacity: perspectives on the paradigm shift of Article 12 CRPD’, Concept Paper, HPOD Conference, Harvard Law School (20 February 2010)Google Scholar

Quinn, Gerard, ‘Re: Hearing on the Mental Capacity Bill’, Statement to the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality, Centre for Disability Law & Policy, NUI Galway (29 February 2012)Google Scholar

Quinn, Gerard, ‘Rethinking personhood: new directions in legal capacity law and policy’, Ideas Paper, University of British Columbia (29 April 2011)Google Scholar

Quinn, Gerard, ‘A short guide to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, in Quinn, Gerard and Waddington, Lisa (eds.), European Yearbook of Disability Law (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2009), vol. 1, 89–114Google Scholar

Quinn, Gerard and Alston, Philip, ‘The nature and scope of states parties’ obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ (1987) 9 Human Rights Quarterly 156–229Google Scholar

Quinn, Gerard and Arstein-Kerslake, Anna, ‘Restoring the ‘human’ in ‘human rights’: personhood and doctrinal innovation in the UN disability convention’, in Gearty, Conor and Douzinas, Costas (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012) 36–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinn, Gerard and Degener, Theresia with Bruce, Anna, Burke, Christine, Castellino, Joshua, Kenna, Padraic, Kilkelly, Ursula and Quinlivan, Shivaun, Human Rights and Disability: The Current Use and Future Potential of United Nations Human Rights Instruments in the Context of Disability, UN Doc HR/PUB/02/1 (New York: United Nations, 2002)Google Scholar

Rachlinski, Jeffrey J., ‘Evidence-based law’ (2011) 96 Cornell Law Review 901–23Google Scholar

Rapely, Mark, The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ray, John, The Place of Women: 1700 to the Present Day (London: Nelson, 1971)Google Scholar

Raybeck, Douglas, ‘Anthropology and labeling theory: a constructive critique’ (1988) 16 Ethos 371–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rehbinder, Manfred, ‘Status, contract, and the welfare state’ (1971) 23 Stanford Law Review 941–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, Genevra, ‘Balancing autonomy and risk: a failure of nerve in England and Wales?’ (2007) 30 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, Genevra, ‘Mental capacity at the margin: the interface between two Acts’ (2010) 18 Medical Law Review 56–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rilling, James K. and Sanfey, Alan G., ‘The neuroscience of social decision-making’ (2011) 62 Annual Review of Psychology 23–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Robertson, Janet, Emerson, Eric, Gregory, Nicky, Hatton, Chris, Kessissoglou, Sophia, Hallam, Angela and Linehan, Christine, ‘Social networks of people with mental retardation in residential settings’ (2001) 39 Mental Retardation 201–142.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Robertson, Janet, Emerson, Eric, Hatton, Chris, Gregory, Nicky, Kessissoglou, Sophia, Hallam, Angela and Walsh, Patricia Noonan, ‘Environmental opportunities and supports for exercising self-determination in community-based residential settings’ (2001) 22 Research in Developmental Disabilities 487–502CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosenfeld, Michel, ‘Substantive equality and equal opportunity: a jurisprudential appraisal’ (1986) 74 California Law Review 1687–1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, The Social Contract, Frankel, Charles ed. (New York: Hafner, 1949, first published 1762)Google Scholar

Ryan, Richard M., ‘Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes’ (1995) 63 Journal of Personality 397–427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ryan, Richard M. and Deci, Edward L., ‘On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being’ (2001) 52 Annual Review of Psychology 141–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ryan, Richard M. and Deci, Edward L., ‘Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being’ (2000) 55 American Psychologist 68–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwartz, Chaya, ‘Assessing levels of personal autonomy among Israeli adults with intellectual disabilities living in group homes and apartment settings’ (1995) 20 Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities 41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, David S., ‘The case of the vanishing protected class: reflections on reverse discrimination, affirmative action, and racial balancing’ (2000) (3) Wisconsin Law Review 657–90Google Scholar

Schweik, Susan M., The Ugly Laws: Disability in Public (New York: New York University, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwelb, Egon, ‘Civil and political rights: the international measures of implementation’ (1968) 62 The American Journal of International Law 827–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, Amartya, Development as Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, The Idea of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Sepúlveda, M. Magdalena, The Nature of the Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2003)Google Scholar

Series, Lucy, The Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the institutional domination of people with learning disabilities’ PhD thesis, University of Exeter (2013)Google Scholar

Series, Lucy, ‘Relationships, autonomy and legal capacity: mental capacity and support paradigms’ (2015) 40 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 80–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shakespeare, Tom, ‘The social model of disability’, in Davis, Lennard J. (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader, 4th edn (New York: Routledge, 2013) 214–21Google Scholar

Shakespeare, Tom and Watson, Nicholas, ‘Defending the social model’ (1997) 12 Disability & Society 293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shay, Giovanna, ‘Similarly situated’ (2011) 18 George Mason Law Review 581–624Google Scholar

Shestack, Jerome J., ‘The philosophic foundations of human rights’ (1998) 20 Human Rights Quarterly 201–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shue, Henry, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and U.S. Foreign Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980)Google Scholar

Sienkiewicz-Mercer, Ruth and Kaplan, Steven B., I Raise My Eyes to Say Yes (West Hartford, Conn.: Whole Health Books, 1996)Google Scholar

Silvers, Anita and Francis, Leslie Pickering, ‘Justice through trust: disability and the “outlier problem” in social contract theory’ (2005) 116 Ethics 40–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvers, Anita and Francis, Leslie Pickering, ‘Thinking about the good: reconfiguring liberal metaphysics (or not) for people with cognitive disabilities’ (2009) 40 Metaphilosophy 475–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Ian, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edn (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984)Google Scholar

Singer, Peter, Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Singer, Peter, ‘Speciesism and moral status’ (2009) 40 Metaphilosophy 567–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sotiri, Mindy P., McGee, Patrick and Baldry, Eileen, ‘No end in sight: the imprisonment, and indefinite detention of Indigenous Australians with a cognitive impairment’, Aboriginal Disability Justice Campaign (September 2012)Google Scholar

Stancliffe, Roger J. and Abery, Brian H., ‘Longitudinal study of deinstitutionalization and the exercise of choice’ (1997) 35 Mental Retardation 159–692.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stein, Michael A., ‘Disability human rights’ (2007) 95 California Law Review 75–121Google Scholar

Stein, Michael A., ‘The paradigm shift from welfare to rights’, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09–26 (11 January 2010)Google Scholar

Stein, Michael Ashley and Lord, Janet E., ‘Future prospects for the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, in Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll and Quinn, Gerard (eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009) 17–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, Henry J. and Alston, Philip, ‘The relationship between the two sets of rights’, in International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000) 268–75Google Scholar

Stone, Emma and Priestley, Mark, ‘Parasites, pawns and partners: disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers’ (1996) 47 The British Journal of Sociology 699–716CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

‘Submission on legal capacity: the Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality’, Centre for Disability Law & Policy, NUI Galway (August 2011)Google Scholar

Swain, John, French, Sally, Barnes, Colin and Thomas, Carol (eds.), Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments, 3rd edn (Los Angeles, Calif.: SAGE Publications, 2013)Google Scholar

‘Swedish Personal Ombudsman service (PO) for people with mental health problems’, Inclusion Europe, available at www.right-to-decide.eu/2014/08/swedish-personal-ombudsman-service-po-for-people-with-mental-health-problems/.Google Scholar

Taylor, James Stacey (ed.), Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Conscience of Europe: 50 Years of the European Court of Human Rights (London: Third Millennium Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar

‘The human rights system: European Union’, Human Rights Education Associates, 2007Google Scholar

Thornburgh, Dick, Former Attorney-General of the United States and Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations, ‘Respecting the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, Testimony before the Foreign Relations Committee of the United States Senate (12 July 2012)Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’, United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law (2008)Google Scholar

Topor, Alain, Andersson, Gunnel, Bülow, Per, Stefansson, Claes-Göran and Denhov, Anne, ‘After the asylum? The new institutional landscape’ (August 2015) Community Mental Health Journal 1–7, doi:10.1007/s10597-015-9928-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Traustadóttir, Rannveig, ‘Disability studies, the social model and legal developments’, in Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll and Quinn, Gerard (eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009) 3–16Google Scholar

Turnbull, H. Rutherford, ‘“Free at last”: Kennedy, King, and the meaning of liberty in the Disability Rights Movement’ (2012) 37 Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 210–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, Bryan S., ‘Human vulnerabilities: on individual and social rights’, in Blau, Judith R. (ed.), The Leading Rogue State: The United States and Human Rights (Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2008) 5–15Google Scholar

United States Government Accountability Office, Guardianship: Cases of Financial Exploitation, Neglect, and Abuse of Seniors (2010)Google Scholar

Vandenhole, Wouter, Non-Discrimination and Equality in the View of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2005)Google Scholar

van Hoof, G.J.H., ‘The legal nature of economic, social and cultural rights: a rebuttal of some traditional views’, in Alston, Philip and Tomaševski, Katarina (eds.), The Right to Food (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1984) 97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vásquez, Alberto, ‘Peruvian General Health Act reform: a new approach to mental health law?’ Unpublished paper (on file with author)Google Scholar

Victorian Law Reform Commission, Guardianship, Final Report No. 24 (2012)Google Scholar

Wallace, Margaret, Evaluation of the Supported Decision Making Project, Final Independent Evaluation, Office of the Public Advocate (November 2012)Google Scholar

Walmsley, Jan and Johnson, Kelley, Inclusive Research with People with Learning Disabilities: Past, Present and Futures (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2003)Google Scholar

Warschauer, Mark, Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, Joanne, ‘Assumptions of decision-making capacity: the role supporter attitudes play in the realisation of Article 12 for people with severe or profound intellectual disability’ (2016) 5 Laws 6, doi:10.3390/laws5010006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wehmeyer, Michael L. and Palmer, Susan B., ‘Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: the impact of self-determination’ (2003) 38 Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 131–44Google Scholar

Weller, Penelope, ‘Human rights and social justice: the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the quiet revolution in international law’ (2009) 4 Public Space: The Journal of Law and Social Justice 74–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weller, Penelope, New Law and Ethics in Mental Health Advance Directives: The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Right to Choose (Hove, East Sussex: Routledge, 2013)Google Scholar

Weller, Penny, ‘Supported decision-making and the achievement of non-discrimination: the promise and paradox of the Disabilities Convention’ (2008) 26 Law in Context 85–110Google Scholar

West’s Encyclopedia of American Law (Detroit: Thomson/Gale, 2005)Google Scholar

Whelan, Darius, Mental Health Law and Practice: Civil and Criminal Aspects (Dublin: Round Hall/Thomson Reuters, 2009)Google Scholar

Winick, Bruce J., ‘On autonomy: legal and psychological perspectives’ (1992) 37 Villanova Law Review 1705–77Google ScholarPubMed

Winick, Bruce J., ‘The side effects of incompetency labeling and the implications for mental health law’ (1995) 1 Psychology, Public Policy and Law 6–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wise, Sarah, Inconvenient People: Lunacy, Liberty and the Mad-Doctors in Victorian England (London: Bodley Head, 2012)Google Scholar

Wong, Sophia Isako, ‘Duties of justice to citizens with cognitive disabilities’, in Kittay, Eva Feder and Carlson, Licia (eds.), Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy (Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010) 127–46Google Scholar

World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry, ‘Response to Draft General Comment on Article 12’, Submission to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2014)Google Scholar

‘Written Answers – National Disability Strategy’, Dáil Debates, vol. 766, no. 1, 22 May 2012 (Shatter, Alan), available at http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/Google Scholar

Zemanek, Karl, ‘Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’, United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law (2009), available at legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/vclt/vclt-e.pdfGoogle Scholar

Zuckerman, Miron, Porac, Joseph, Lathin, Drew, Smith, Raymond and Deci, Edward L., ‘On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically-motivated behavior’ (1978) 4 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 443–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar