Response strategy assessment: a tool for evaluating resilience for the management of social–ecological systems

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139107778.017

13 - Response strategy assessment: a tool for evaluating resilience for the management of social–ecological systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2012

Magnus Tuvendal and

Thomas Elmqvist

Edited by

Tobias Plieninger and

Claudia Bieling

Show author details

Tobias Plieninger: Affiliation:
Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities
Claudia Bieling: Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter our intent is to present a method – response strategy assessment – for evaluating the resilience of social–ecological systems. We will describe how key features of social–ecological resilience can be used as a basis for a simple and generic analytical tool. This method uses empirical observations of stakeholder actions, qualitative or quantitative, as input data.

We begin with a review of recent thinking concerning resilience-orientated approaches to landscape management, making important distinctions among three responses to disturbance: coping, adapting and strategic transformation. We define and classify ecosystem services as they apply to landscapes, paying particular attention to how the ecological scales (where services are generated) may or may not coincide in space or time with the social scales where stakeholders receive benefits.

We combine all of these notions in the application of response strategy assessment in a cultural landscape in southern Sweden. We conclude that the method is a simple application of resilience concepts, with potential for use in a variety of cultural landscapes and management situations.

Resilience-orientated approaches to landscape management

Resilience-orientated approaches to landscape management are concerned with how systems respond to disturbance. A disturbance may come in different forms, such as stress driven by slow-changing variables or as shocks related to fast-changing variables.

Resilience is simultaneously dependent on the nature of the drivers that exert stress or shock and on the nature of the system under influence of this disturbance. A system with few properties that support resilience may be very persistent in a stable environment with few and mild disturbances. Likewise, a system with properties that contribute to robustness, sturdiness, etc. would not be resilient in an overly hostile environment. One needs to explore both the properties of disturbances as well as those of the system to estimate the resilience of a particular system.

Type: Chapter
Information: Resilience and the Cultural Landscape
Understanding and Managing Change in Human-Shaped Environments
, pp. 224 - 241

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139107778.017 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Armitage, D.Marschke, M.Plummer, R. 2008 Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learningGlobal Environmental Change 18 86CrossRef Google Scholar

Barthel, S.Folke, C.Colding, J. 2010 Social–ecological memory in urban gardens retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem servicesGlobal Environmental Change 20 255CrossRef Google Scholar

Berkes, F. 2007 Community-based conservation in a globalized worldProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 15 188CrossRef Google Scholar

Carpenter, S.Walker, B.Anderies, J. M. 2001 From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?Ecosystems 4 765CrossRef Google Scholar

Council of Europe 2000 The European Landscape ConventionStrasbourgCouncil of EuropeGoogle Scholar

Crossman, N. D.Bryan, B. A. 2009 Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionalityEcological Economics 68 654CrossRef Google Scholar

de Groot, R. 2002 A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and servicesEcological Economics 41 393CrossRef Google Scholar

de Groot, R.Alkemade, R.Braat, L.Hein, L. 2010 Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision makingEcological Complexity 7 260CrossRef Google Scholar

Evans, C. D.Monteith, D. T.Cooper, D. M. 2005 Long-term increases in surface water dissolved organic carbon: observations, possible causes and environmental impactsEnvironmental Pollution 137 55CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fabricius, C.Folke, C.Cundill, G.Schultz, L. 2007 Powerless spectators, coping actors, and adaptive co-managers: a synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem managementEcology and Society 12 29http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art29/CrossRef Google Scholar

Feenstra, J. F.Burton, I.Smith, J. B.Tol, R. S. J. 1998 Handbook on Methods for Climate Change Impact Assessment and Adaptation StrategiesNairobi and AmsterdamUNEP and Institute for Environmental Studies (IVMGoogle Scholar

Fisher, B.Turner, R. K.Morling, P. 2009 Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision makingEcological Economics 68 643CrossRef Google Scholar

Folke, C. 2006 Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analysesGlobal Environmental Change 16 253CrossRef Google Scholar

Holling, C. S.Meffe, G. K. 1996 Command and control and the pathology of natural resource managementConservation Biology 10 328CrossRef Google Scholar

Leech, B. 2002 Asking questions: techniques for semistructured interviewsPolitical Science and Politics 35 665CrossRef Google Scholar

MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis ReportWashington, DCIsland PressGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, M.Possingham, H. 2007 Active adaptive management for conservationConservation Biology 21 956CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Monteith, D. T.Stoddard, J. L.Evans, C. D. 2007 Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistryNature 450 537CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Naeem, S. 1998 Species redundancy and ecosystem reliabilityConservation Biology 12 39CrossRef Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. 2009 A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systemsScience 325 419CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Oxford Dictionaries 2011 Oxford Dictionaries OnlineOxford, UKOxford University Presshttp://oxforddictionaries.com/words/aboutGoogle Scholar

Parry, M. L.Canziani, O. F.Palutikof, J. P.van der Linden, P. J.Hanson, C. E. 2007 Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and VulnerabilityCambridge, UKCambridge University Press

Risbey, J.Kandlikar, M.Dowlatabadi, H. 1999 Scale, context, and decision making in agricultural adaptation to climate variability and changeMitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4 137CrossRef Google Scholar

Schultz, L.Folke, C.Olsson, P. 2007 Enhancing ecosystem management through social–ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, SwedenEnvironmental Conservation 34 140CrossRef Google Scholar

Sendzimir, J.Flachner, Z. 2007 Exploiting ecological disturbanceFarming with Nature: The Science and Practice of EcoagricultureScherr, S. J.McNeely, J. A.Washington, DCIsland Press211Google Scholar

Smit, B.Pilifosova, O. 2003 From adaptation to adaptive capacity and vulnerability reductionClimate Change, Adaptive Capacity and DevelopmentSmith, J. B.Klein, R. J. T.Huq, S.LondonImperial College Press9CrossRef Google Scholar

Smit, B.Wandel, J. 2006 Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerabilityGlobal Environmental Change 16 282CrossRef Google Scholar

Tuvendal, M.Elmqvist, T. 2011 Ecosystem services linking social and ecological systems – river brownification and the response of down stream stakeholdersEcology and Society 16 21http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss4/art21/CrossRef Google Scholar

Walker, B. H.Holling, C. S.Carpenter, S. R.Kinzig, A. P. 2004 Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systemsEcology and Society 9 5http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/CrossRef Google Scholar

Worrall, F.Burt, T. P. 2009 Changes in DOC treatability: indications of compositional changes in DOC trendsJournal of Hydrology 366 1CrossRef Google Scholar