Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:20:03.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - ‘Inside’ and ‘outside’ the firm: corporate law and contract governance as regulatory theories

from Part I - Crisis and normality in transnational market regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

By
Peer Zumbansen
Edited by
Bertram Lomfeld ,
Alessandro Somma  and
Peer Zumbansen
Bertram Lomfeld
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Alessandro Somma
Affiliation:
University of Ferrar
Peer Zumbansen
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Reshaping Markets
Economic Governance, the Global Financial Crisis and Liberal Utopia
 , pp. 60 - 59
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J N & Brownsword, R 1987. ‘The Ideologies of Contract’. Legal Studies 7: 205–223.Google Scholar
Aguilera, R, Rupp, D, Williams, C A & Ganapathi, J 2004. ‘Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multi-Level Theory of Social Change in Organizations’. Academy of Management Review 32: 836–863, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=567842.Google Scholar
Aguilera, R V, Desender, K A & Kabbach de Castro, L R 2011. A Bundle Perspective to Comparative Corporate Governance. In Clarke, T & Branson, D (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Corporate Governance (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications), 379–405.Google Scholar
Aguilera, R V & Williams, C A 2011. ‘Law and Finance’: Inaccurate, Incomplete, and Important. In Williams, C A & Zumbansen, P (eds.), The Embedded Firm: Corporate Governance, Labour and Financial Capitalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 256–274.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G A & Shiller, R J 2009. Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Alchian, A A & Demsetz, H 1972. ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’. American Economic Review 62: 777–795.Google Scholar
Allen, W T 1992. ‘Our Schizophrenic Conception of the Business Corporation’. Cardozo Law Review 14: 261–281.Google Scholar
Aman, A C Jr. 1997. Administrative Law for a New Century. In Taggart, M (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart Publishing), 90–107.Google Scholar
Aman, A C Jr. 2007. ‘Bureaucracy, Contracts and Democracy in Administrative Law: Outsourcing Prison Health Care in New York City’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14: forthcoming.Google Scholar
Amstutz, M 2009. The Constitution of Contractual Networks. In Amstutz, M & Teubner, G (eds.), Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Co-operation (Oxford & Portland, OR: Hart Publishing), 309–346.Google Scholar
Amstutz, M 2011a. Eroding Boundaries: On Financial Crisis and an Evolutionary Concept of Regulatory Reform. In Kjaer, P, Teubner, G & Febbrajo, A (eds.), The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation (Oxford & Portland, OR: Hart Publishing), 223–268.Google Scholar
Amstutz, M 2011b. Globalising Speenhamland: On the Transnational Metamorphosis of Corporate Social Responsibility. In Joerges, C & Falke, J (eds.), Karl Polanyi, Globalisation and the Potential of Law in Transnational Markets (Oxford & Portland, OR: Hart Publishing), 359–393.Google Scholar
Antonelli, C 1999. ‘The Evolution of the Industrial Organisation of the Production of Knowledge’. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23: 243–260.Google Scholar
Backer, L C 2011. ‘Private Actors and Public Governance Beyond the State: The Multinational Corporation, the Financial Stability Board, and the Global Governance Order’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 18: 751–802.Google Scholar
Baecker, D 2006. Wirtschaftssoziologie (Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag).Google Scholar
Berle, A A 1931. ‘Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust’. Harvard Law Review 44: 1049–1074.Google Scholar
Berle, A A 1954. The 20th Century Capitalist Revolution (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World).Google Scholar
Berle, A A & Means, G C 1991. The Modern Corporation and Private Property [1932]. With a new introduction by Murray Weidenbaum & Mark Jensen (Brunswick, NJ/London: Transaction Publishers).Google Scholar
Blankenburg, E 1984. ‘The Poverty of Evolutionism: A Critique of Teubner’s Case for “Reflexive Law”’. Law & Society Review 18: 273–289.Google Scholar
Branson, D M 2001. ‘The Very Uncertain Prospect of “Global” Convergence in Corporate Governance’. Cornell International Law Journal 34: 321–362.Google Scholar
Bratton, W W 1989. ‘The “Nexus of Contracts” Corporation: A Critical Appraisal’. Cornell Law Review 74: 407–465.Google Scholar
Bratton, W W 1992. ‘The Economic Structure of the Post-Contractual Corporation’. Northwestern University Law Review 87: 180–215.Google Scholar
Bratton, W W 2001. ‘Berle and Means Reconsidered at the Century’s Turn’. Journal of Corporate Law 26: 737–770.Google Scholar
Bratton, W W 2005. ‘Welfare, Dialectic, and Mediation in Corporate Law’. Berkeley Business Law Journal 2: 59–76.Google Scholar
Browning, C 1992. Ordinary Men: Reserve Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (New York: Harper Collins).Google Scholar
Büthe, T & Mattli, W 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Calliess, G-P 2007. ‘The Making of Transnational Contract Law’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14: 469–483.Google Scholar
Calliess, G-P, Dietz, T, Konradi, W, Nieswandt, H & Sosa, F 2007. Transformations of Commercial Law: New Forms of Legal Certainty for Globalised Exchange Processes? In Hurrelman, A, Leibfried, S, Martens, K & Mayer, P (eds.), Transforming the Golden Age Nation State (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan), 83–108.Google Scholar
Calliess, G-P & Renner, M 2009. ‘Between Law and Social Norms: The Evolution of Global Governance’. Ratio Juris 22: 260–280.Google Scholar
Calliess, G-P & Zumbansen, P 2008. ‘Law, the State and Evolutionary Theory: Introduction’. German L.J. 9: 389–396.Google Scholar
Calliess, G-P & Zumbansen, P 2010. Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar
Campbell, D 2000. ‘Reflexivity and Welfarism in the Modern Law of Contract’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20: 477–498.Google Scholar
Campbell, D 2004. ‘The Incompleteness of our Understanding of the Law and Economics of Relational Contract’. Wisconsin Law Review 2004: 645–678.Google Scholar
Campbell, D 2008. Breach of Contract and the Efficiency of Markets. In Copp, S F (ed.), The Legal Foundations of Free Markets (London: Institute of Economic Affairs), 140–157.Google Scholar
Carney, M, Gedajlovic, E & Sur, S 2011. ‘Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Conflict’. Journal of Management Governance 13: 483–507.Google Scholar
Caruso, D 2006. ‘Private Law and State-Making in the Age of Globalization’. New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 39: 1–74.Google Scholar
Charny, D 1996. ‘Illusions of a Spontaneous Order: “Norms” in Contractual Relationships’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144: 1841–1858.Google Scholar
Cheffins, B R 2004. ‘The Trajectory of (Corporate) Law Scholarship’. Cambridge Law Journal 63: 456–506.Google Scholar
Cioffi, J W 2000. ‘State of the Art: A Review Essay on Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research’. American Journal of Comparative Law 48: 501.Google Scholar
Coase, R 1960. ‘The Problem of Social Cost’. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.Google Scholar
Cohen, F 1935. ‘Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach’. Columbia Law Review 35: 809–849.Google Scholar
Cohen, M R 1927. ‘Property and Sovereignty’. Cornell Law Quarterly 13: 8–30.Google Scholar
Cohen, M R 1932. ‘The Basis of Contract’. Harvard Law Review 46: 553–592.Google Scholar
Collins, H 1997. ‘The Voice of the Community in Private Law Discourse’. European Law Journal 3: 407–421.Google Scholar
Collins, H 1999. Regulating Contracts (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Cotterrell, R 2008. ‘Transnational Communities and the Concept of Law’. Ratio Juris 21: 1–18.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, R 2009. ‘Spectres of Transnationalism: Changing Terrains of Sociology of Law’. Journal of Law and Society 36: 481–500.Google Scholar
Cranston, R 2007. ‘Theorizing Transnational Commercial Law’. Texas International Law Journal 42: 597–617.Google Scholar
Crouch, C 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neo-Liberalism (London: Polity).Google Scholar
Crozier, M 1994. L’entreprise à l’écoute. Apprendre le management post-industriel [1989] (Paris: Seuil).Google Scholar
Daintith, T & Teubner, G (eds.) 1986. Contract and Organisation: Legal Analysis in the Light of Economic and Social Theory (Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Damm, R 1999. ‘Privatautonomie und Verbraucherschutz: Legalstruktur und Realstruktur von Autonomiekonzepten’. Versicherungsrecht 50: 129–141.Google Scholar
Dawson, J P 1947. ‘Economic Duress – An Essay in Perspective’. Michigan Law Review 45: 253–290.Google Scholar
Deakin, S 2003. Workers, Finance and Democracy. In Barnard, C, Deakin, S & Morris, G S (eds.), The Future of Labour Law: Liber Amicorum for Bob Hepple (Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing), 79.Google Scholar
Deakin, S 2011. ‘Legal Evolution: Integrating Economic and Systemic Approaches’. University of Cambridge Legal Studies Research Paper Series 41/2011, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1934738.Google Scholar
Deakin, S & Konzelmann, S J 2003. ‘After Enron: An Age of Enlightenment?’. Organization 10: 583–587.Google Scholar
Dewey, J 1926. ‘The Historic Background of Corporate Legal Personality’. Yale Law Journal 35: 655–673.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, M S, Van den Bosch, F A J & Volberda, H W 1999. ‘Where Do New Organizational Forms Come From? Management Logics as a Source of Coevolution’. Organization Science 10: 569–582.Google Scholar
Dixit, A K 2004. Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance (Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Dore, R, Lazonick, W & O’Sullivan, M 1999. ‘Varieties of Capitalism in the Twentieth Century’. Oxford Review of Economic Policy (Oxford Rev. Econ. Pol’y) 15: 102–117.Google Scholar
Drobek, J (ed.) 2006. Norms and the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, F H & Fischel, D R 1991. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (Cambridge, MA/London, UK: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Ehrlich, E 1962. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law (orig. published in German as Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts, 1913) (New York: Russell & Russell).Google Scholar
Ellickson, R C 1998. ‘Law and Economics Discovers Social Norms’. Journal of Legal Studies 27: 537–565.Google Scholar
Esser, J P 1996. ‘Institutionalizing Industry: The Changing Forms for Contract’. Law and Social Inquiry 593–629.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, G 1996. Shifting Boundaries: The Private, the Public, and the Welfare State. In Katz, M B & Sachße, C (eds.), The Mixed Economy of Social Welfare (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 72–94.Google Scholar
Freund, E 1897. The Legal Nature of Corporations (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Galanter, M 2006. ‘In the Winter of Our Discontent: Law, Anti-Law, and Social Science’. Annual Review of Law & Social Sciences 1–16.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J K 1967. The New Industrial State (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
Gatsios, K G & Holmes, P H 1998. Regulatory Competition. In Newman, P (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Law and Economics, vol. 3 (London: Macmillan), 271–275.Google Scholar
Gilson, R J 1992 The Political Ecology of Takeovers: Thoughts on Harmonizing the European Corporate Governance Environment. In Hopt, K J & Wymeersch, E. (eds.), European Takeovers: Law and Practice (London: Butterworths), 49–74.Google Scholar
Gordon, J N 2002. ‘What Enron Means for the Management and Control of the Modern Business Corporation: Some Initial Reflections’. Chicago Law Review 69: 1233.Google Scholar
Gordon, J N 2004. Globalizing Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or Function. In Gordon, J N & Roe, M J (eds.), Convergence or Persistence in Corporate Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 128–158.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M 1973. ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.Google Scholar
Grant, W & Wilson, G K (eds.) 2014 The Consequences of the global financial crisis: The Rhetoric of Reform and Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Greenfield, K 2008. ‘Reclaiming Corporate Law in a New Gilded Age’. Harvard Law & Policy Review 2: 1–32.Google Scholar
Grimm, D (ed.) 1976 Rechtswissenschaft und Nachbarwissenschaften (C.H. Beck).Google Scholar
Gurvitch, G 1947. Sociology of Law (orig. published in French as Problèmes de la sociologie du droit) (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Guzman, A T 2008. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hadfield, G 2009. The Public and the Private in the Provision of Law for Global Services. In Gessner, V (ed.), Contractual Certainty in International Trade: Empirical Studies and Theoretical Debates on Institutional Support for Global Economic Exchanges (Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart Publishing), 239–256.Google Scholar
Hadfield, G K 2011. ‘Legal Infrastructure and the New Economy’. Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, available at http://works.bepress.com/ghadfield/35.Google Scholar
Hale, R L 1923. ‘Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State’. Political Science Quarterly 38: 470–494.Google Scholar
Hale, T & Held, D (eds.) 2011 Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations (Polity Press)Google Scholar
Hall, P A & Soskice, D (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Hansmann, H 2006. ‘How Close is the End of History?’. Journal of Corporate Law 31: 745–750.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H & Kraakman, R 2001. ‘The End of History for Corporate Law’. Georgetown Law Journal 89: 439–468.Google Scholar
Hart, D 1984. ‘Zur konzeptionellen Entwicklung des Vertragsrechts’. Die Aktiengesellschaft (AG) 29: 66–80.Google Scholar
Harvey, D 2005. ‘The Sociological and Geographical Imaginations’. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society: 211–256.Google Scholar
Hayek, F 1945. ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’. American Economic Review 35: 519–530.Google Scholar
Henwood, D 2003. After the New Economy (Toronto: The New Press).Google Scholar
Hickman, K E & Hill, C A 2010. ‘Concepts, Categories, and Compliance in the Regulatory State’. Minnesota Law Review 94: 1151–1201.Google Scholar
Holmes, O W J 1897. ‘The Path of the Law’. Harvard Law Review 10: 457–478.Google Scholar
Holmes, O W 1899. ‘Law in Science and Science in Law’. Harvard Law Review 12: 443–463.Google Scholar
Hopt, K J 2006. Comparative Company Law. In Reimann, M & Zimmermann, R (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press), 1161–1191.Google Scholar
Howells, G & Wilhelmsson, T 2003. ‘EC Consumer Law: Has It Come of Age?’. European Law Review 28: 370–388.Google Scholar
Jacoby, S 2011. Labor and Finance in the United States. In Williams, C A & Zumbansen, P (eds.), The Embedded Firm: Labour, Corporate Governance, and Finance Capitalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 277–317.Google Scholar
Jensen, M C 2000. A Theory of the Firm: Governance, Residual Claims, and Organizational Forms (Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Jensen, M C 2001. ‘Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function’. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 14.Google Scholar
Jensen, M C & Meckling, W H 1976. ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D 1975. The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought (Washington, D.C.: Beard Books).Google Scholar
Kennedy, D 1981. ‘Cost-Reduction as Legitimation’. Yale Law Journal 90: 1275–1283.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D 1998. Law and Economics from the Perspective of Critical Legal Studies. In Newman, P (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law (London: Macmillan), 465–474.Google Scholar
Kinley, D & Tadaki, J 2004. ‘From Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law’. Va. J. Int’l L. 44: 931–1022.Google Scholar
Klein, F 1904. Die neueren Entwicklungen in Verfassung und Recht der Aktiengesellschaft (Vienna: Manzsche k.u.k. Hof-Verlags- und Universitäts-Buchhandlung).Google Scholar
Klein, N 2007. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism (Toronto: Knopf Canada).Google Scholar
Kreide, R 2009. ‘The Ambivalence of Juridification: On Legitimate Governance in the International Context’. Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 2: 18–34.Google Scholar
Kreitner, R 2005. ‘Frameworks of Cooperation: Competing, Conflicting, and Joined Interests in Contract and its Surroundings’. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 6: 59–111.Google Scholar
La Porta, R, Lopez-de-Silanes, F & Shleifer, A 2008. ‘The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins’. Journal of Economic Literature 46: 285–332, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1028081.Google Scholar
La Porta, R, Lopez-de-Silanes, F, Shleifer, A & Vishny, R W 1998. ‘Law and Finance’. Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113–1155.Google Scholar
Ladeur, K-H 1997. ‘Towards a Legal Theory of Supranationality – The Viability of the Network Concept’. European Law Journal 3: 33–54.Google Scholar
Landis, J W 1938. The Administrative Process (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Llewellyn, K 1930. ‘What Price Contract? – An Essay in Perspective’. Yale Law Journal 40: 704–751.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, K 1950. Bramble Bush (1928/29) (New York/London/Rome: Oceana Publishing).Google Scholar
Lobel, O 2004. ‘The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought’. Minnesota Law Review 89: 342–469.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N 1992. ‘Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of the Legal System’. Cardozo Law Review 13: 1419–1441.Google Scholar
Macaulay, S 1963. ‘Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study’. American Sociological Review 28: 55–67.Google Scholar
Macaulay, S 1977. ‘Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract’. Law & Society Review 11: 507–528.Google Scholar
Macaulay, S 1986. Private Government. In Lipson, L & Wheeler, S (eds.), Law and the Social Sciences (Washington, DC: Russell Sage), 445–518.Google Scholar
Macaulay, S, Friedman, L M & Mertz, E 2007. Law in Action: A Socio-Legal Reader (New York: Foundation Press).Google Scholar
Macey, J 2003. ‘Regulatory Globalization as a Response to Regulatory Competition’. Emory Law Journal 52: 1352–1379.Google Scholar
Macneil, I R 1978. ‘Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations Under Classical, Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law’. Northwestern University Law Review 72: 854–905.Google Scholar
Macneil, I R 1980. The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations (New Haven/London: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Macneil, I R 1985. ‘Relational Contract: What We Do and What We Do Not Know’. Wisconsin Law Review: 483–525.Google Scholar
Macneil, I R 2000. ‘Contracting Worlds and Essential Contract Theory’. Social & Legal Studies 9: 431–438.Google Scholar
Mattei, U & Nicola, F 2006. ‘A “Social Dimension” in European Private Law? The Call for Setting a Progressive Agenda’. New England Law Review 41: 1–66.Google Scholar
Merry, S E 1992. ‘Anthropology, Law, and Transnational Processes’. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 357–379.Google Scholar
Merry, S E 2014. Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance. In Zumbansen, P & Buchanan, R (eds.), Law in Transition: Rights, Development and Transitional Justice (Oxford & Portland OR: Hart Publishing), 141–164.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R H & Kornhauser, L 1979. ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce’. Yale Law Journal 88: 950–997.Google Scholar
Moore, S F 1973. ‘Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study’. Law & Society Review 7: 719–746.Google Scholar
Moreau Defarges, P 2003. La Gouvernance [Que sais-je? no. 3676] (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
Möslein, F 2010. ‘Contract Governance und Corporate Governance im Zusammenspiel. Lehren aus der globalen Finanzkrise’. Juristenzeitung 65:Google Scholar
Möslein, F & Riesenhuber, K 2009. ‘Contract Governance – A Research Agenda’. European Review of Contract Law 5: 248, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1499614.Google Scholar
Möslein, F, Riesenhuber, K & Grundmann, S (eds.) 2012 Contract Governance (Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Naphtali, F 1928. Wirtschaftsdemokratie. Ihr Wesen, Weg und Ziel (Berlin: Verlagsgesellschaft des ADGB).Google Scholar
Nee, V & Swedberg, R 2005. Economic Sociology and New Institutional Economics. In Ménard, C & Shirley, M M (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics (Heidelberg: Springer), 789–818.Google Scholar
Nelson, R R & Winter, S G 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, MA/London, UK: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
North, D C 1991. ‘Institutions’. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 97–112.Google Scholar
Oberdiek, J 2008. ‘Philosophical Issues in Tort Law’. Philosophy Compass 3: 734–748.Google Scholar
O’Hara, E A & Ribstein, L E 2009. The Law Market (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Orts, E 1995. ‘Reflexive Environmental Law’. Northwestern University Law Review 89: 1227–1340.Google Scholar
Orts, E 1998. ‘The Future of Enterprise Organization’. Michigan Law Review 96: 1947–1974.Google Scholar
Orts, E W 2013. Business Persons: A Legal Theory of the Firm (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ostrom, E 2007. ‘Challenges and Growth: The Development of the Interdisciplinary Field of Institutional Analysis’. Journal of Institutional Economics 3: 239–264.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, M 2000. ‘The Innovative Enterprise and Corporate Governance’. Cambridge Journal of Economics 24: 393–416.Google Scholar
Pagano, U & Rossi, M A 2009. ‘The Crash of the Knowledge Economy’. Cambridge Journal of Economics 33: 665–683.Google Scholar
Pierson, P 1996. ‘The New Politics of the Welfare State’. World Politics 48: 143–179.Google Scholar
Pistor, K 1999. Codetermination: A Sociopolitical Model with Governance Externalities. In Blair, M & Roe, M J (eds.), Employees and Corporate Governance (Washington: Brookings Institution), 163–193.Google Scholar
Posner, E A 2000. Law and Social Norms (Cambridge, MA & London, UK: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Posner, E A 2009. The Perils of Global Legalism (Chicago: Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
Posner, R A 1997. ‘The Path Away from the Law’. Harvard Law Review 110: 1039–1043.Google Scholar
Posner, R A 1998. ‘Social Norms, Social Meaning, and the Economic Analysis of Law’. Journal of Legal Studies 27: 553–565.Google Scholar
Post, J E Preston, L E & Sachs, S 2002. Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Pound, R 1908. ‘Mechanical Jurisprudence’. Columbia Law Review 8: 605.Google Scholar
Pound, R 1910. ‘Law in Books and Law in Action’. American Law Review 44: 12.Google Scholar
Pound, R 1924. ‘The Growth of Administrative Justice’. Wisconsin Law Review 2: 321–339.Google Scholar
Pound, R 1931. ‘The Call for a “Realist” Jurisprudence’. Harvard Law Review 44: 706.Google Scholar
Power, M 1994. Constructing the Responsible Organization: Accounting and Environmental Representation. In Teubner, G, Farmer, L & Murphy, D (eds.), Environmental Law and Ecological Responsibility: The Concept and Practice of Ecological Self-Organization (London: Wiley), 369–392.Google Scholar
Radin, M J 2007. Boilerplate Today: The Rise of Modularity and the Waning of Consent. In Ben-Shahar, O (ed.), Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 189–199.Google Scholar
Ramsay, I 1993. ‘Consumer Law and Structures of Thought: A Comment’. J. Cons. Pol. 16: 79.Google Scholar
Rathenau, W 1918. Vom Aktienwesen (Berlin: S. Fischer).Google Scholar
Renner, K 1949. The Institutions of Private Law and Their Social Functions (orig. German 1929) (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Resnik, J 2013. ‘Globalization(s), Privatization(S), Constitutionalization, and Statization: Icons and Experiences of Sovereignty in the 21st Century’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 11: 162–199.Google Scholar
Riles, A 2005. ‘A New Agenda for the Cultural Study of Law: Taking on the Technicalities’. Buffalo Law Review 53: 973.Google Scholar
Robé, J-P 1995. ‘L’entreprise en droit’. Droit et Société 29: 117–136.Google Scholar
Roberts, J 2004. The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth (Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Rodrik, D 2004. ‘Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development’. Journal of Economic Growth 9: 131–165.Google Scholar
Roe, M J 1994. Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Roe, M J 1998. Comparative Corporate Governance. In Newman, P (ed.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 339–346.Google Scholar
Romano, R 1992. A Guide to Takeovers: Theory, Evidence and Regulation. In Hopt, K J & Wymeersch, E (eds.), European Takeovers. Law and Practice (London.: Butterworths), 3–48.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J G 2013. Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (New York & London: Norton).Google Scholar
Sassen, S 2000. ‘The State and Economic Globalization: Any Implications for International Law?’. Chicago Journal of International Law 1: 109–116.Google Scholar
Schanze, E 1986. Potential and Limits of Economic Analysis: The Constitution of the Firm. In Daintith, T & Teubner, G (eds.), Contract and Organisation: Legal Analysis in the Light of Economic and Social Theory (Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter), 204–218.Google Scholar
Schmitthoff, C M 1961. ‘International Business Law: A New Law Merchant’. Current Law and Social Problems 2: 129–153.Google Scholar
Schreuer, C 1993. ‘The Waning of the Sovereign State: Towards a New Paradigm for International Law?’. European Journal of International Law 4: 447–471.Google Scholar
Scott, C 2004. Regulation in the Age of Governance: The Rise of the Post Regulatory State. In Jordana, J & Levi-Faur, D (eds.), The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 145–174.Google Scholar
Scott, C 2010. ‘Regulatory Governance and the Challenge of Constitutionalism’. EUI Working Papers. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Private Regulation Series-02 http://ucd-ie.academia.edu/documents/0093/9406/RSCAS_2010_07.pdf.Google Scholar
Scott, C, Cafaggi, F & Senden, L (eds.) The Challenge of Transnational Private Regulation: Conceptual and Constitutional Debates. Symposium Issue of the Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 1–188 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).Google Scholar
Scott, R E 2000. ‘The Case for Formalism in Relational Contract’. Northwestern University Law Review 94: 847–876.Google Scholar
Scott, R E 2004. ‘The Death of Contract Law’. University of Toronto Law Journal 54: 369–390.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A & Vishny, R W 1997. ‘A Survey of Corporate Governance’. The Journal of Finance 52: 737–783.Google Scholar
Siems, M M & Deakin, S 2009. ‘Comparative Law and Finance: Past, Present and Future Research’. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics http://ssrn.com/abstract=1428247.Google Scholar
Soskice, D 1999. Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980’s and 1990’s. In Kitschelt, H, Lange, P, Marks, G & Stephens, J D (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 101–134.Google Scholar
Spamann, H 2009. ‘Contemporary Legal Transplants – Legal Families and the Diffusion of (Corporate) Law’. Brigham Young University Law Review http://ssrn.com/abstract=1411704.Google Scholar
Stephan, P B 2000. Regulatory Cooperation and Competition: The Search for Virtue. In Bermann, G A, Herdegen, M & Lindseth, P L (eds.), Transatlantic Regulatory Co-operation (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press), 167–202.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J 2003. The Roaring Nineties: Seeds of Destruction (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
Streeck, W 2014. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism (orig. German ‘Die gekaufte Zeit’, 2012) (New York: Verso).Google Scholar
Sunstein, C 1996. ‘Social Norms and Social Roles’. Columbia Law Review 96: 903–968.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C (ed.) Behavioural Law & Economics (University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Teubner, G 1983. ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’. Law & Society Review 17: 239–285.Google Scholar
Teubner, G 1984. ‘Autopoiesis in Law and Society: A Rejoinder to Blankenburg’. Law & Society Review 18: 291–301.Google Scholar
Teubner, G 1988. ‘Enterprise Corporatism: New Industrial Policy and the “Essence” of the Legal Person’. American Journal of Comparative Law 36: 130–155.Google Scholar
Teubner, G 1993. Law as an Autopoeitic System (Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Teubner, G 1997. ‘Global Bukowina’: Legal Pluralism in the World Society. In Teubner, G (ed.), Global Law Without A State (Aldershot: Ashgate), 3–28.Google Scholar
Teubner, G 1999. After Privatisation? The Many Autonomies of Private Law. In Wilhelmsson, T & Hurri, S (eds.), From Dissonance to Sense: Welfare State Expectations, Privatisation and Private Law (Aldershot: Ashgate), 51–82.Google Scholar
Teubner, G 2000. ‘Contracting Worlds: The Many Autonomies of Private Law’. Social & Legal Studies 9: 399–417.Google Scholar
Teubner, G 2007. ‘In the Blind Spot: The Hybridization of Contracting’. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8: 51–71.Google Scholar
Teubner, G 2011. ‘Self-Constitutionalizing TNCs? On the Linkage of “Private” and ‘Public’ Corporate Codes of Conduct’. Gralf-Peter Calliess (ed.), Governing Transnational Corporations – Public and Private Perspectives. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 17: 1–20.Google Scholar
Thaler, R & Sunstein, C 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Tiebout, C M 1956. ‘A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures’. Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424.Google Scholar
Tomlins, C 2013. Law ‘And’, Law ‘In’, Law ‘As’: The Definition, Rejection and Recuperation of the Socio-Legal Enterprise. In Petersen, K (ed.), Socio-legality: An Odyssey of Ideas and Context (Annandale, NSW (Australia): Federation Press), 137–163.Google Scholar
Triantis, G G 2006. ‘Anticipating Litigation in Contract Design’. Yale Law Journal 115: 814–879.Google Scholar
Tsuk, D 2005. ‘From Pluralism to Individualism: Berle and Means and 20th Century American Legal Thought’. Law & Social Inquiry 30: 179–225.Google Scholar
Vagts, D F 1969. ‘The Multinational Enterprise: A New Challenge for Transnational Law’. Harvard Law Review 83: 739–792.Google Scholar
van Aaken, A 2009. ‘Effectuating Public International Law Through Market Mechanisms?’. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 165: 33–57.Google Scholar
Vandenbergh, M P 2007. ‘The New Walmart Effect: The Role of Private Contracting in Global Governance’. UCLA Law Review 54: 913.Google Scholar
Veblen, T 1958. The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904) (New York: Mentor Books).Google Scholar
Villiers, C 2008. Corporate Law, Corporate Power and Corporate Social Responsibility. In Boeger, N, Murray, R & Villiers, C (eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 85–112.Google Scholar
Vincent-Jones, P 2007. ‘The New Public Contracting: Public versus Private Ordering?’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14: 259–278.Google Scholar
Weber, M 1967. On Law in Economy and Society (transl. from the German Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 2nd ed., 1925, by Shils, E and Rheinstein, M, edited/annotated by M Rheinstein) (New York: Simon Schuster).Google Scholar
Weissbrodt, D & Kruger, M 2005. Human Rights Responsibilities of Business as Non-State Actors. In Alston, P (ed.), Non-State Actors and Human Rights (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press), 315–350.Google Scholar
Welker, M, Partridge, D J & Hardin, R 2011. ‘Corporate Lives: New Perspectives on the Social Life of the Corporate Form’. Current Anthropology 52: S3–S16.Google Scholar
Wheeler, D & Grayson, D 2001. ‘Business and Its Stakeholders’. Journal of Business Ethics 32: 101–106.Google Scholar
Wieacker, F 1967. Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der deutschen Entwicklung (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Wiethölter, R 1985. Proceduralization of the Category of Law. In Joerges, C & Trubek, D (eds.), Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 501–510.Google Scholar
Wiethölter, R 1986. Materialization and Proceduralization in Modern Law. In Teubner, G (ed.), Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State (Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter), 221–249.Google Scholar
Williamson, O 2002. ‘The Lens of Contract: Private Ordering’. American Economic Review 92: 438–442.Google Scholar
Williamson, O E 1981. ‘The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes’. Journal of Economic Literature 19: 1537–1568.Google Scholar
Williamson, O E 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Zumbansen, P 2006. The Conundrum of Corporate Social Responsibility: Remarks on the Changing Nature of Firms and States. In Bratspies, R & Miller, R (eds.), Transboundary Harm: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 274–289.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, P 2007. ‘The Law of Society: Governance Through Contract’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14: 191–233, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=988610.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, P 2011. ‘Neither “Public” nor “Private”, “National” nor “International”: Transnational Corporate Governance from a Legal Pluralist Perspective’. Journal of Law & Society 38: 50–75.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, P 2012. Governance: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. In Levi-Faur, D (ed.), Oxford Handbook on Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 83–96, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1671673.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, P 2013. Law and Legal Pluralism: Hybridity in Transnational Governance. In Jurcys, P, Kjaer, P F & Yatsunami, R (eds.), Regulatory Hybridization in the Transnational Sphere (Leiden & Boston: Martinus Nijhoff), 49–70.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, P 2013. ‘Lochner Disembedded: The Anxieties of Law in a Global Context’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20: 29–69, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2174017.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, P 2014. Sociological Jurisprudence 2.0: Updating Law’s Interdisciplinarity in a Global Context. In Buchanan, R & Zumbansen, P (eds.), Law in Transition: Rights, Development and Transitional Justice (Oxford & Portland: Hart), 331–357, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2277980.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, P & Archer, S 2008. ‘The BCE Decision: Reflections on the Firm as a Contractual Organization’. CLPE Comparative Research in Law & Political Economy Research Paper, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1160094.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×