Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 April 2022
Abstract
Chapter 6 draws on the preceding empirical and analytical narrative to reflect on the larger purpose of the study: using the Pondicherry case study to reflect on the procedure of granting citizenship within a colonial context during the early Third Republic. Political infighting and corruption within the colonial administration, rather than a cultural explanation, elucidates the malfunctioning of fair electoral processes and participation in local political institutions in this colonial enclave. More broadly, what can Pondicherry from the Third Republic to the Fifth Republic tell us about the interplay between empire and citizenship within the context of the French empire? Was Pondicherry an exceptional case? Finally, we discuss the legacy, if any, of such a political experience on independent India.
Keywords: citizenship and empire, civilizing mission, British India, nationalism
What Conclusions Can We Draw from Republican Citizenship in Pondicherry?
The preceding chapters have examined the implementation of republican citizenship in Pondicherry between 1870 and 1914. The study reveals a history of political infighting and struggles over status in relation to caste, class, and inclusive and exclusive visions of citizenship. Because the term ‘citizenship’ denotes political membership of a state, a prime citizenship right is the freedom to participate in the political sphere. While all adult men in French India had electoral rights, they were often bullied to vote for a certain candidate or prevented from exercising their voting rights. Thus, citizenship in Pondicherry was inclusive in that electoral rights were not reserved solely for those with European ancestry. However, it was exclusive in its implementation due to clientelism, corruption, intimidation, and bribery, which sometimes prevented electors from voting freely. It was only for the elites that electoral citizenship in Pondicherry constituted an inclusive bond within the political community. They fully participated in the political process, because they were able to read and write French – a condition to run for elected positions such as councilman – and they were the ones who usually initiated petitions to question matters related to elections, as explained in Chapter 5. In contrast, when the lower strata of society made appeals to the colonial state, these appeals usually revolved around matters that could improve their lot, such enlisting in the colonial army or accessing education, which they hoped would increase their chances for employment in desirable positions within the colonial administration or other professions.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.