Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 April 2022
Abstract
Chapter 5 explores the colonial state's capacities to prepare and monitor elections as well as to maintain law and order during electoral periods. Electoral fraud and the use of intimidation were recurring problems. These as well malfeasance and systemic manipulation are useful concepts to understand electoral misbehaviours. During this period, petitions were the main tool for people to demand that the colonial administration resolve the electoral disputes. In doing so, the petitioners underlined the state's inability to conduct proper elections while simultaneously reinforcing the legitimacy of the colonial rule.
Keywords: elections, frauds, colonial state, petitions, law and order, partisan politics
Political rights imply the entitlement to participate in the exercise of power. This chapter addresses how Pondicherry's population participated in the political arena not only through the act of voting but also through petitioning the colonial state. In the Indian empire, the act of petitioning was not new. The practice began in the Mughal Empire (1526–1857) in India, during which arzdashts or supplications were part of the Persianate administration's documents, as the scholar Zaidi stated:
It is obvious that in the pre-colonial period, there was a well-established and sophisticated mechanism to file petitions to the superior authorities.[…]
This window was open to the people to ventilate their grievances […] It was a way to have direct communication and to remain in touch with the people, and the state considered its duty to meet the expectations of the people.
Each time and place has people communicating in specific ways with the holders of power, either individually or collectively.
Under the Third Republic in Pondicherry, the colonial state received many petitions regarding the functioning of the electoral system and various forms of fraud. Petitions in the Tamil language were translated into French by clerks. Some were filled out by individuals and others by groups, but all asked for redress. The Ministry of the Navy and Colonies stated in an 1879 ministerial dispatch that petitions were an important means through which the population communicated with the local authorities, and this was the legitimate way to address grievances.
It appears most of the petitions were written by members of the upper castes, primarily by Vellalas, and secondarily by merchants and Chettiars.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.