Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Diagrams, Graphs, Images, Maps, and Tables
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Pondicherry in the French Empire during the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries: Between Colonial Subjects and French Citizens
- 2 Contextualizing Pondicherry within the French Empire and the Indian Subcontinent
- 3 Inclusive and Exclusive Visions of Citizenship in French India
- 4 Education and Army: Attempts to Institutionalize Republican Ideals in French India
- 5 The Art of Petitioning in a Colonial Setting
- 6 From Electoral Politics to Expansion of Rights and National Independence
- Bibliography
- Index
5 - The Art of Petitioning in a Colonial Setting
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 April 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Diagrams, Graphs, Images, Maps, and Tables
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Pondicherry in the French Empire during the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries: Between Colonial Subjects and French Citizens
- 2 Contextualizing Pondicherry within the French Empire and the Indian Subcontinent
- 3 Inclusive and Exclusive Visions of Citizenship in French India
- 4 Education and Army: Attempts to Institutionalize Republican Ideals in French India
- 5 The Art of Petitioning in a Colonial Setting
- 6 From Electoral Politics to Expansion of Rights and National Independence
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Abstract
Chapter 5 explores the colonial state's capacities to prepare and monitor elections as well as to maintain law and order during electoral periods. Electoral fraud and the use of intimidation were recurring problems. These as well malfeasance and systemic manipulation are useful concepts to understand electoral misbehaviours. During this period, petitions were the main tool for people to demand that the colonial administration resolve the electoral disputes. In doing so, the petitioners underlined the state's inability to conduct proper elections while simultaneously reinforcing the legitimacy of the colonial rule.
Keywords: elections, frauds, colonial state, petitions, law and order, partisan politics
Political rights imply the entitlement to participate in the exercise of power. This chapter addresses how Pondicherry's population participated in the political arena not only through the act of voting but also through petitioning the colonial state. In the Indian empire, the act of petitioning was not new. The practice began in the Mughal Empire (1526–1857) in India, during which arzdashts or supplications were part of the Persianate administration's documents, as the scholar Zaidi stated:
It is obvious that in the pre-colonial period, there was a well-established and sophisticated mechanism to file petitions to the superior authorities.[…]
This window was open to the people to ventilate their grievances […] It was a way to have direct communication and to remain in touch with the people, and the state considered its duty to meet the expectations of the people.
Each time and place has people communicating in specific ways with the holders of power, either individually or collectively.
Under the Third Republic in Pondicherry, the colonial state received many petitions regarding the functioning of the electoral system and various forms of fraud. Petitions in the Tamil language were translated into French by clerks. Some were filled out by individuals and others by groups, but all asked for redress. The Ministry of the Navy and Colonies stated in an 1879 ministerial dispatch that petitions were an important means through which the population communicated with the local authorities, and this was the legitimate way to address grievances.
It appears most of the petitions were written by members of the upper castes, primarily by Vellalas, and secondarily by merchants and Chettiars.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Republican Citizenship in French Colonial Pondicherry, 1870-1914 , pp. 151 - 192Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2022