Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:07:26.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Genetic resource banks for species conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2010

W. V. Holt
Affiliation:
Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London
Teresa Abaigar
Affiliation:
Estacion Experimental de Zonas Aridas, General Segura, 1, Almeria 4001, Spain
P. F. Watson
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Basic Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London NW 0TU, U.K.
D. E. Wildt
Affiliation:
Conservation & Research Center, National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Front Royal, VA 22630 and Washington, DC 20008, U.S.A.
William V. Holt
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London
Amanda R. Pickard
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London
John C. Rodger
Affiliation:
Marsupial CRC, New South Wales
David E. Wildt
Affiliation:
Smithsonian National Zoological Park, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Genetic resource banking (GRB) provides potentially useful support for managing and conserving wildlife species. The GRB concept and strategies have received increasing attention over the last two decades (Holt et al., 1996b; Wildt et al., 1997; Holt & Pickard, 1999; Watson & Holt, 2001). This chapter summarises the general ideas presented in these earlier works while outlining new developments and providing examples of how GRBs are being applied to particular species. Specifically, we endeavour to provide a realistic evaluation of the current utility of GRBs, illustrating how to integrate the logistics of the technology into practical conservation programmes.

In terms of focus, this chapter is concerned with wild animal GRBs which are defined as organised collections of stored germplasm, mainly cryopreserved spermatozoa from individuals whose contribution to the gene pool is too valuable to lose. This definition helps to distinguish GRBs from other collections of frozen, dried or fixed biomaterials. Although a useful research resource, such collections have until recently had little practical value in breeding programmes. The GRB discussed here also differs from ad hoc collections of germplasm amassed opportunistically over time. By nature such collections are unplanned, containing random assortments of species and individuals. In contrast, a useful GRB is preplanned in some detail, addressing a wide range of organisational issues, from mundane specimen labelling to safe stewardship, to the politics of proprietary rights.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ballou, J. D. & Cooper, K. A. (1992). Genetic management strategies for endangered captive populations: the role of genetic and reproductive technology. In Biotechnology and the Conservation of Genetic Diversity (Eds. H. D. M. Moore, W. V. Holt & G. M. Mace), pp. 183–286. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bennett, P. M. (2001). Establishing animal germplasm resource banks for wildlife conservation: genetic, population and evolutionary aspects. In Cryobanking the Genetic Resource. Wildlife Conservation for the Future? (Eds. P. F. Watson & W. V. Holt), pp. 47–67. Taylor & Francis, London
Candy, C. J., Wood, M. J. & Whittingham, D. G. (2000). Restoration of a normal reproductive lifespan after transplantation of cryopreserved mouse ovaries. Human Reproduction 15, 1300–1304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, J., Whittingham, D. G., Wood, M. J., Telfer, E. & Gosden, R. G. (1990). Extraovarian production of mature viable mouse oocytes from frozen primary follicles. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 90, 321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clouthier, D. E., Avarbock, M. R., Maika, S. D., Hamma, R. E. & Brinster, R. L. (1996). Rat spermatogenesis in mouse testis. Nature 381, 418–421CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, W. V. & Moore, H. D. M. (1988). Semen banking–is it now feasible for captive endangered species?Oryx 22, 172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, W. V. & Pickard, A. R. (1999). Role of reproductive technologies and genetic resource banks in animal conservation. Reviews in Reproduction 4, 143–150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, W. V., Abaigar, T. & Jabbour, H. N. (1996a). Oestrous synchronization, semen preservation and artificial insemination in the Mohor gazelle (Gazella dama mhorr) for the establishment of a genome resource bank programme. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 8, 1215–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, W. V., Bennett, P. M., Volobouev, V. & Watson, P. F. (1996b). Genetic resource banks in wildlife conservation. Journal of Zoology (London) 238, 531–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, L. A. & Lacy, R. C. (1995). Genome resource banking for species conservation: selection of sperm donors. Cryobiology 32, 68–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkwood, J. K. & Colenbrander, B. (2001). Disease control measures for genetic resource banking. In Cryobanking the Genetic Resource. Wildlife Conservation for the Future? (Eds. P. F. Watson & W. V. Holt), pp. 69–84. Taylor & Francis, London
Lacy, R. C. (1987). Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection and population subdivision. Conservation Biology 1, 143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, M. F. (1989). The Value of Conserving Genetic Resources. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
Polge, C., Smith, A. V. & Parkes, A. S. (1949). Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature 164, 166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rott, N. N. (1996). The organization of genetic cryobanks and the use of developmental biology methods for the conservation of rare animals. II. Obtaining and cryoconservation of embryos of wild animals. Russian Journal of Developmental Biology 27, 245–255Google Scholar
Sipko, T. P., Abilov, A. I., Shurkhal, A. V. & Rott, N. N. (1994). Creation of a bison sperm cryobank as a means of conserving genetic polymorphism in this species. In Soviet Genetics pp. 1516–1520. Plenum Publishing, New York
Sipko, T. P., Rautian, G. S., Udina, I. G. & Strelchenko, N. S. (1997). Conservation of genetic material from endangered and economically important ungulate species in establishment of cryobanks. Physiology & General Biology Reviews 13, 35–98Google Scholar
Sztein, J., Sweet, H., Farley, J. & Mobraaten, L. (1998). Cryopreservation and orthotopic transplantation of mouse ovaries: New approach in gamete banking. Biology of Reproduction 58, 1071–1074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veprintsev, B. N. & Rott, N. N. (1979). Conserving genetic resources. Nature 280, 633–634Google Scholar
Veprintsev B. N. & Rott, N. N. (1980). Genome Conservation, pp. 1–49. Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Puschino
Watson, P. F. (Ed.) (1978). Artificial Breeding of Non-Domestic Animals. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, No. 43. Academic Press, London
Watson, P. F. (2000). The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Animal Reproduction Science 60–61, 481–492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, P. F. & Holt, W. V. (2001). Organizational issues concerning the establishment of a genetic resource bank. In Cryobanking the Genetic Resource. Wildlife Conservation for the Future? (Eds. P. F. Watson & W. V. Holt), pp. 113–122, Taylor & Francis, London
Whittingham, D. G., Lyon, M. F. & Glenister, P. H. (1977). Long-term storage of mouse embryos at -196 ℃: the effect of background radiation. Genetic Research, Cambridge 29, 171–181CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wildt, D. E. (1997). Genome Resource Banking. Impact on biotic conservation and society. In Reproductive Tissue Banking (Eds. A. M. Karow & J. Critser), pp. 399–439. Academic Press, New YorkCrossRef
Wildt, D. E., Byers, A. P., Howard, J. G., Wiese, R., Willis, K, O'Brien, S. J., Block, J., Tilson, R. I. & Rall, W. F. (1993). Tiger Genome Resource Banking (GRB) Action Plan. Global Need and a Plan for the North American Region. CBSG. Apple Valley, 12101 Johnny Cake Road, MA 55124, USA
Wildt, D. E., Rall, W. F., Critser, J. K., Monfort, S. L. & Seal, U. S. (1997). Genome resource banks. BioScience 47, 689–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Genetic resource banks for species conservation
    • By W. V. Holt, Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Teresa Abaigar, Estacion Experimental de Zonas Aridas, General Segura, 1, Almeria 4001, Spain, P. F. Watson, Department of Veterinary Basic Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London NW 0TU, U.K., D. E. Wildt, Conservation & Research Center, National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Front Royal, VA 22630 and Washington, DC 20008, U.S.A.
  • Edited by William V. Holt, Zoological Society of London, Amanda R. Pickard, Zoological Society of London, John C. Rodger, David E. Wildt, Smithsonian National Zoological Park, Washington DC
  • Book: Reproductive Science and Integrated Conservation
  • Online publication: 21 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615016.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Genetic resource banks for species conservation
    • By W. V. Holt, Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Teresa Abaigar, Estacion Experimental de Zonas Aridas, General Segura, 1, Almeria 4001, Spain, P. F. Watson, Department of Veterinary Basic Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London NW 0TU, U.K., D. E. Wildt, Conservation & Research Center, National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Front Royal, VA 22630 and Washington, DC 20008, U.S.A.
  • Edited by William V. Holt, Zoological Society of London, Amanda R. Pickard, Zoological Society of London, John C. Rodger, David E. Wildt, Smithsonian National Zoological Park, Washington DC
  • Book: Reproductive Science and Integrated Conservation
  • Online publication: 21 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615016.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Genetic resource banks for species conservation
    • By W. V. Holt, Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Teresa Abaigar, Estacion Experimental de Zonas Aridas, General Segura, 1, Almeria 4001, Spain, P. F. Watson, Department of Veterinary Basic Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London NW 0TU, U.K., D. E. Wildt, Conservation & Research Center, National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Front Royal, VA 22630 and Washington, DC 20008, U.S.A.
  • Edited by William V. Holt, Zoological Society of London, Amanda R. Pickard, Zoological Society of London, John C. Rodger, David E. Wildt, Smithsonian National Zoological Park, Washington DC
  • Book: Reproductive Science and Integrated Conservation
  • Online publication: 21 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615016.021
Available formats
×