Reciprocating Engines

doi:10.1017/9781009072366.005

3 - Reciprocating Engines

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2022

André L. Boehman

Edited by

Jacqueline O'Connor ,

Bobby Noble and

Tim Lieuwen

Show author details

Jacqueline O'Connor: Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Bobby Noble: Affiliation:
Electric Power Research Institute
Tim Lieuwen: Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Reciprocating internal combustion engines rely on a piston-cylinder configuration to achieve a batch periodic conversion from chemical energy in a fuel to mechanical energy leaving an engine. In this category of energy conversion devices are included spark-ignition (SI) engines which may operate on gaseous or liquid fuels, and compression-ignition (CI) engines which may operate on liquid or a combination of liquid and gaseous fuels. As described by Lichty, the first example of an internal combustion engine was that of Abbé Hautefueille in 1678 using the combustion of gunpowder in a cylinder to move a piston and produce work. Renewable fuels and bio-based chemicals and materials are nothing new. They have served humankind since the dawn of civilization. And that there would be changes in how we power our transportation systems is also nothing new.

Keywords

compression ignition diesel spark ignition gasoline NOx particulate knock mileage spray

Type: Chapter
Information: Renewable Fuels
Sources, Conversion, and Utilization
, pp. 75 - 137

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009072366.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abboud, J., Schobing, J., Legros, G., Matynia, A., Bonnety, J., Tschamber, V., Brillard, A., Leyssens, G., & Da Costa, P. 2018. Impacts of ester’s carbon chain length and concentration on sooting propensities and soot oxidative reactivity: Application to Diesel and Biodiesel surrogates. Fuel, 222, 586–598.Google Scholar

Agarwal, A. K. 2007. Biofuels (alcohols and biodiesel) applications as fuels for internal combustion engines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 33, 233–271.Google Scholar

Alam, M., Goto, S., Sugiyama, K., Kajiwara, M., Mori, M., Mori, M., Konno, M., Motohashi, M. & Oyama, K. 2001. Performance and Emissions of a DI Diesel Engine Operated with LPG and Ignition Improving Additives. SAE Technical Paper, 2001-01-3680.Google Scholar

Aldrich, B. 1996. ABCs of AFVs: A Guide to Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Compendium (ed.), California Energy Commission.Google Scholar

Alexandrino, K. 2020. Comprehensive review of the impact of 2,5-Dimethylfuran and 2-Methylfuran on soot emissions: Experiments in diesel engines and at laboratory-scale. Energy and Fuels, 34, 6598–6623.Google Scholar

Alger, T. & Mangold, B. 2009. Dedicated EGR: A new concept in high efficiency engines. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2, 620–631.Google Scholar

Alleman, T. L. 2020. Assessment of BQ-9000 Biodiesel Properties for 2020. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Report No.: NREL/TP-5400-79815.Google Scholar

Arcoumanis, C., Bae, C., Crookes, R. & Kinoshita, E. 2008. The potential of di-methyl ether (DME) as an alternative fuel for compression-ignition engines: A review. Fuel, 87, 1014–1030.CrossRef Google Scholar

Armas, O., Yehliu, K. & Boehman, A. L. 2010. Effect of alternative fuels on exhaust emissions during diesel engine operation with matched combustion phasing. Fuel, 89, 438–456.Google Scholar

Asaumi, Y., Shintani, M. & Watanabe, Y. 1992. Effects of Fuel Properties on Diesel Engine Exhaust Emission Characteristics. SAE Technical Paper, 922214.Google Scholar

ASTM International. 2018. Standard Test Method for Evaluating Lubricity of Diesel Fuels by the High-Frequency Reciprocating Rig (HFRR), D6079-18.Google Scholar

ASTM International. 2019a. Standard Test Method for Determination of MTBE, ETBE, TAME, DIPE, tertiary-Amyl Alcohol and C1 to C4 Alcohols in Gasoline by Gas Chromatography, D4815-15b(2019).Google Scholar

ASTM International. 2019b. Standard Test Method for Motor Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel, D2700-19.Google Scholar

ASTM International. 2019c. Standard Test Method for Research Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel, D2699-19.Google Scholar

ASTM International. 2020a. Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels, D6751-20a.Google Scholar

ASTM International. 2020b. Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel, D975-20c.Google Scholar

ASTM International. 2020c. Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oil, Biodiesel Blend (B6 to B20), D7467-20a.Google Scholar

ASTM International. 2020d. Standard Specification for Dimethyl Ether for Fuel Purposes, D7901-20.Google Scholar

ASTM International. 2020e. Standard Test Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products and Liquid Fuels at Atmospheric Pressure, D86-20b.Google Scholar

ASTM International. 2020f. Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure of Petroleum Products (Reid Method), D323-20a.Google Scholar

ASTM International. 2021. Standard Specification for Automotive Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel, D4814-21a.Google Scholar

Atkinson, C. M., Thompson, G. J., Traver, M. L. & Clark, N. 1999. In-Cylinder Combustion Pressure Characteristics of Fischer-Tropsch and Conventional Diesel Fuels in a Heavy Duty CI Engine. SAE Technical Paper, 1999-01-1472.Google Scholar

Barnes, K. D., Kittelson, D. B. & Murphy, T. E. 1975. Effect of Alcohols as Supplemental Fuel for Turbocharged Diesel Engines. SAE Technical Papers, 750469.Google Scholar

Barrientos, E. J., Maricq, M. M., Boehman, A. L. & Anderson, J. E. 2015. Impact of Ester Structures on the Soot Characteristics and Soot Oxidative Reactivity of Biodiesel. SAE Technical Paper, 2015-01-1080.Google Scholar

Barry, E. G., McCabe, L. J., Gerke, D. H. & Perez, J. M. 1985. Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine/Fuels Combustion Performance and Emissions: A Cooperative Research Program. SAE Technical Paper, 852078.Google Scholar

Bartle, K. D., Abbass, M. K., Andrews, G. E. & Williams, P. T. 1989. The Influence of Diesel Fuel Composition on Particulate PAH Emissions. SAE Technical Paper, 892079.Google Scholar

Bertoli, C. & Del Giacomo, N. 1997. Diesel Combustion Improvements by the Use of Oxygenated Synthetic Fuels. SAE Technical Paper, 972972.Google Scholar

Bhide, S., Morris, D., Leroux, J., Wain, K. S., Perez, J. M. & Boehman, A. L. 2003. Characterization of the viscosity of blends of dimethyl ether with various fuels and additives. Energy and Fuels, 17, 1126–1132.Google Scholar

Bockris, J. O. M. 1984. Hydrogen: Then and Now. Advances in Hydrogen Energy, Proceedings of the 5th World Hydrogen Energy Conference, 3–10.Google Scholar

Boehman, A.L., Luecke, J., Fouts, L., Ratcliff, M., Zigler, B.T. and McCormick, R.L., 2021. Ignition delay measurements of four component model gasolines exploring the impacts of biofuels and aromatics. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 38(4), 5549–5555.Google Scholar

Boehman, A. L., Song, J. & Alam, M. 2005. Impact of biodiesel blending on diesel soot and the regeneration of particulate filters. Energy and Fuels, 19, 1857–1864.Google Scholar

Borman, G. L. & Ragland, K. W. 1998. Combustion Engineering, (ed.), Boston, WCB/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Brinkman, N. D. 1981. Ethanol Fuel: A Single-Cylinder Engine Study of Efficiency and Exhaust Emissions. SAE Technical Paper, 810345.Google Scholar

Brook, D. L., Rallis, C. J., Lane, N. W. & Cipolat, D. 1984. Methanol with Dimethyl Ether Ignition Promoter as Fuel for Compression Ignition Engines. Proceedings of the Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, 654–658.Google Scholar

Brookshear, D. W., Nguyen, K., Toops, T. J., Bunting, B. G., Rohr, W. F. & Howe, J. 2012. Investigation of the effects of biodiesel-based Na on emissions control components. Catalysis Today, 184, 205–218.Google Scholar

Brusstar, M., Stuhldreher, M., Swain, D. & Pidgeon, W. 2002. High Efficiency and Low Emissions from a Port-Injected Engine with Neat Alcohol Fuels. SAE Technical Paper, 2002-01-2743.Google Scholar

Buckner, C. 2020. U.S. biodiesel production capacity declined slightly in 2019. Today in Energy [Online]. Available: www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=45696.Google Scholar

Burns, V. R., Benson, J. D., Hochhauser, A. M., Koehl, W. J., Kreucher, W. M. & Reuter, R. M. 1991. Description of Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. Society of Automotive Engineers, 912320.Google Scholar

California Air Resources Board. 2020, Facts about the Low NOx Heavy-Duty Omnibus Regulation [press release]. Sacramento, CA: August 27, 2020. Available: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/heavy-duty-low-nox/about.Google Scholar

Camarsa, M., Hublin, M. & Mackinven, R. 1996. Impact of EPEFE Data on the European Auto-Oil Process. SAE Technical Paper, 961076.Google Scholar

Canaan, R. E., Dec, J. E. & Green, R. M. 1998. The Influence of Fuel Volatility on the Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in a Heavy-Duty D.I. Diesel Engine. SAE Technical Paper, 980510.Google Scholar

Catherine, E. G. P. & Francis, L. 2002. Advances in Hydrogen Energy, (ed.), Springer.Google Scholar

Charbonneau, P., Slodowske, W., Fleisch, T., Mccarthy, C., Basu, A. & Udovich, C. 1995. A New Clean Diesel Technology: Demonstration of ULEV Emissions on a Navistar Diesel Engine Fueled with Dimethyl Ether. SAE Technical Paper, 950061.Google Scholar

Cheenkachorn, K. & Fungtammasan, B. 2010. An investigation of diesel-ethanol-biodiesel blends for diesel engine: Part 1. emulsion stability and fuel properties. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 32, 637–644.Google Scholar

Chen, R., Qin, Z., Han, J., Wang, M., Taheripour, F., Tyner, W., O’Connor, D. & Duffield, J. Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission effects of biodiesel in the United States with induced land use change impacts. Bioresource Technology, 251, 249–258.Google Scholar

Cheng, A. S., Upatnieks, A. & Mueller, C. J. 2006. Investigation of the impact of biodiesel fuelling on NOx emissions using an optical direct injection diesel engine. International Journal of Engine Research, 7, 297–318.Google Scholar

Clerk, D. & Burls, G. A. 1913. The Gas, Petrol and Oil Engine (ed.), John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Consumers Union 2006. The ethanol myth. Consumer Reports, October 2006. Consumers Union.Google Scholar

Cummins, C. L. Jr. 1993. Diesel’s Engine (ed.), Carnot USA Books.Google Scholar

Cung, K., Zhu, X., Moiz, A. A., Lee, S.-Y. & De Ojeda, W. 2016. Characteristics of formaldehyde (CH₂O) formation in dimethyl ether (DME) spray combustion using PLIF imaging. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 9, 138–148.Google Scholar

Dahnz, C. & Spicher, U. 2010. Irregular combustion in supercharged spark ignition engines – pre-ignition and other phenomena. International Journal of Engine Research, 11, 485–498.Google Scholar

Dahodwala, M., Joshi, S., Koehler, E., Franke, M., Tomazic, D. & Naber, J. 2020. Investigation of Diesel-CNG RCCI Combustion at Multiple Engine Operating Conditions. SAE Technical Paper, 2020-01-0801.Google Scholar

Dec, J. E. 1997. A Conceptual Model of DI Diesel Combustion Based on Laser-Sheet Imaging. SAE Technical Paper, 970873.Google Scholar

Pozo, Del, A., C., Cloete, S., Álvaro, Á. J., Donat, F. & Amini, S. 2021. The potential of gas switching partial oxidation using advanced oxygen carriers for efficient H₂ production with inherent CO₂ capture. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(102), 4713.Google Scholar

Dempsey, A. B., Das Adhikary, B., Viswanathan, S. & Reitz, R. D. 2012. Reactivity controlled compression ignition using premixed hydrated ethanol and direct injection diesel. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 134(8), 082806.Google Scholar

Dempsey, A. B., Ryan Walker, N. & Reitz, R. 2013. Effect of piston bowl geometry on dual fuel reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) in a light-duty engine operated with gasoline/diesel and methanol/diesel. SAE International Journal of Engines, 6, 78–100.CrossRef Google Scholar

Denbratt, I. & Salsing, H. 2008. Performance of a Heavy Duty DME Engine: The Influence of Methanol and Water in the Fuel. SAE Technical Paper, 2008-01-1391.Google Scholar

Diesel, R. 1912. The diesel oil engine. Journal of the American Society for Naval Engineers, 24, 653–692.Google Scholar

Diesel Technology Forum 2021, 53.6 Percent of Commercial Trucks Operating in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio And Wisconsin Now Powered By Newest-Generation Near-Zero Emissions Diesel Technology [press release]. June 24, 2021. Available: www.dieselforum.org/news/53-6-percent-of-commercial-trucks-operating-in-illinois-indiana-michigan-minnesota-ohio-and-wisconsin-now-powered-by-newest-generation-near-zero-emissions-diesel-technology.Google Scholar

Dorn, P., Mourao, A. M. & Herbstman, S. 1986. The Properties and Performance of Modern Automotive Fuels, 1986. SAE Technical Paper, 861178.Google Scholar

Eberhardt, J. J. 2002. Fuels of the Future for Cars and Trucks. 2002 Diesel Engine Emissions Reduction (DEER) Workshop; August 25–29, 2002; San Diego, California.Google Scholar

Eckerle, W., Sujan, V. & Salemme, G. 2017. Future Challenges for Engine Manufacturers in View of Future Emissions Legislation. SAE Technical Paper, 2017-01-1923.Google Scholar

Eirich, J., Chapman, E., Glunt, H., Klinikowski, D., Boehman, A. L., Hansel, J. G. and Heydorn, E. C. 2003. Development of a Dimethyl Ether (DME)- Fueled Shuttle Bus. SAE Technical Paper, 2003-01-0756Google Scholar

Esper, J. L., Miers, S. A., Carlson, R. W., Mcconnell, S. S., Ng, H. K. & Wallner, T. 2008. Drive Cycle Analysis of Butanol/Diesel Blends in a Light-Duty Vehicle. SAE Technical Paper, 2008-01-2381.Google Scholar

Fanick, E. R., Whitney, K. A. & Bailey, B. K. 1996. Particulate Characterization Using Five Fuels. SAE Technical Papers, 961089.Google Scholar

Fleisch, T. H., Basu, A. & Sills, R. A. 2012. Introduction and advancement of a new clean global fuel: The status of DME developments in China and beyond. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 9, 94–107.Google Scholar

Forum, J. D. 2007. DME Handbook (ed.), Japan DME Forum.Google Scholar

Fox, M. K., Lilik, G. K., Boehman, A. L. & Le Corre, O. 2009. Combustion of syngas in internal combustion engines. In Lieuwen, T., Yang, V. & Yetter, R. (eds.) Synthesis Gas Combustion: Fundamentals and Applications. CRC Press.Google Scholar

Fuels and Lubes International 2007. Company news: Cummins approves use of B20 blends. Fuels and Lubes International, 13, 34.Google Scholar

Fujimoto, K., Hirano, S., Yamashita, M. & Takeuchi, K. 2012. Investigation of engine oil effect on abnormal combustion in turbocharged direct injection – spark ignition engines. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 5, 1017–1024.Google Scholar

Fulton, J., Lynch, F., Marmaro, R. & Willson, B. 1993. Hydrogen for Reducing Emissions from Alternative Fuel Vehicles. SAE Technical Papers.Google Scholar

Gallagher, P., Yee, W. & Baumes, H. S. 2016. 2015 Energy Balance for the Corn-Ethanol Industry. Office of Energy Policy and New Uses, U.S. Department of Agriculture; 2016.Google Scholar

Gaspar, D. J. 2021. Top 13 Blendstocks Derived from Biomass for Mixing-Controlled Compression-Ignition (Diesel) Engines: Bioblendstocks with Potential for Lower Emissions and Increased Operability. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Report No.: PNNL-31421.Google Scholar

Glassman, I. 1996. Combustion, 3rd ed., Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gopalakrishnan, R., Throop, M. J., Richardson, A. & Lapetz, J. 2007. Engineering the Ford H₂ IC Engine Powered E-450 Shuttle Bus. SAE Technical Papers, 2007-01-4095.Google Scholar

Goto, S., Lee, D., Wakao, Y., Honma, H., Mori, M., Akasaka, Y., Hashimoto, K., Motohashi, M. and Konno, M. Development of an LPG DI Diesel Engine Using Cetane Number Enhancing Additives. SAE Technical Paper, 1999-01-3602.Google Scholar

Graboski, M. S. & Mccormick, R. L. 1998. Combustion of fat and vegetable oil derived fuels in Diesel engines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 24, 125–164.Google Scholar

Grannell, S. M., Assanis, D. N., Bohac, S. V. & Gillespie, D. E. 2006. The operating features of a stoichiometric, ammonia and gasoline dual fueled spark ignition engine. 2006 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2006 – Energy.Google Scholar

Grannell, S. M., Assanis, D. N., Bohac, S. V. & Gillespie, D. E. 2008. The fuel mix limits and efficiency of a stoichiometric, Ammonia, and Gasoline dual fueled spark ignition engine. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 130(4), 042802.Google Scholar

Green, C. J. & Cockshutt, N. A. 1990. Dimethyl Ether as a Methanol Ignition Improver: Substitution Requirements and Exhaust Emissions Impact. SAE Technical Paper, 902155.Google Scholar

Guo, J., Chikahisa, T. & Murayama, T. 1994. Improvement of Performance and Emissions of a Compression Ignition Methanol Engine with Dimethyl Ether. SAE Technical Paper, 941908.Google Scholar

Han, T., Lavoie, G., Wooldridge, M. & Boehman, A. 2017. Effect of Syngas (H₂/CO) on SI engine knock under boosted EGR and lean conditions. SAE International Journal of Engines, 10(3), 959–969.Google Scholar

Hansen, J. B., Voss, B., Joensen, F. & Siguroardóttir, I. D. 1995. Large Scale Manufacture of Dimethyl Ether: A New Alternative Diesel Fuel from Natural Gas. SAE Technical Paper, 950063.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. M., Kokjohn, S. L., Splitter, D. A. and Reitz, R. D., 2010. An experimental investigation of fuel reactivity controlled PCCI combustion in a heavy-duty engine. SAE International Journal of Engines, 3(1), pp.700–716.Google Scholar

Harrington, J., Munshi, S., Nedelcu, C., Ouellette, P., Thompson, J. & Whitfield, S. 2002. Direct Injection of Natural Gas in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine. SAE Technical Papers, 2002-01-1630.Google Scholar

Harrison, R. M., Allan, J., Carruthers, D., Heal, M. R., Lewis, A. C., Marner, B., Murrells, T. & Williams, A. 2021. Non-exhaust vehicle emissions of particulate matter and VOC from road traffic: A review. Atmospheric Environment, 262, 118592.Google Scholar

Heywood, J. B. 2018. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar

Higgins, B., Siebers, D., Mueller, C. & Aradi, A. 1998. Effects of an ignition-enhancing, diesel-fuel additive on diesel-spray evaporation, mixing, ignition, and combustion. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 27, 1873–1880.Google Scholar

Higgins, B. S., Mueller, C. J. & Siebers, D. L. 1999. Measurements of Fuel Effects on Liquid-Phase Penetration in DI Sprays 1. SAE Technical Papers, 1999-01-0519.Google Scholar

Hill, S., Shi, E. & Colletti, P. 2021. U.S. renewable diesel capacity could increase due to announced and developing projects. Today in Energy [Online]. Available: www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=48916.Google Scholar

Hochhauser, A. M. 2009. Review of prior studies of fuel effects on vehicle emissions. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 2, 541–567.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, R. L., Van Blarigan, P. & Mulligan, N. 1996. NOx Emissions and Efficiency of Hydrogen, Natural Gas, and Hydrogen/Natural Gas Blended Fuels. SAE Technical Papers.Google Scholar

Huber, G. W., Iborra, S. & Corma, A. 2006. Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: Chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. Chemical Reviews, 106, 4044–4098.Google Scholar

Huq, N. A., Huo, X., & Vardon, D. R. 2019. Performance-advantaged ether diesel bioblendstock production by a priori design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 26421–26430.Google Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2018. Global warming of 1.5°C. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Environmental Program.Google Scholar

Jing, Z., Zhang, C., Cai, P., Li, Y. & Wang, J. 2021. Construction of a reduced diesel/polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether 3 (PODE3) reaction mechanism for combustion and emission analysis. Energy and Fuels, 35, 4437–4446.Google Scholar

Kajitani, S. 2006. Recommended Specification of Fuel DME for Automobile. 2nd International DME Conference; International DME Association; London, England.Google Scholar

Kajitani, S., Chen, C. L. & Oguma, M. 1998. Direct Injection Diesel Engine Operated with Propane–DME Blended Fuel. SAE Technical Paper, 982536.Google Scholar

Kalghatgi, G. T. & Bradley, D. 2012. Pre-ignition and “super-knock” in turbo-charged spark-ignition engines. International Journal of Engine Research, 13, 399–414.Google Scholar

Kapus, P. & Ofner, H. 1995. Development of Fuel Injection Equipment and Combustion System for DI Diesels Operated on Dimethyl Ether. SAE Technical Paper, 950062.Google Scholar

Kapus, P. E. & Cartellieri, W. P. 1995. ULEV Potential of a DI/TCI Diesel Passenger Car Engine Operated on Dimethyl Ether. SAE Technical Paper, 952754.Google Scholar

Karpuk, M. E. & Cowley, S. W. 1988. On Board Dimethyl Ether Generation to Assist Methanol Engine Cold Starting. SAE Technical Paper, 881678.Google Scholar

Kass, M., Wissink, M., Janke, C., Connatser, R. & Curran, S. 2020. Compatibility of elastomers with polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers and blends with diesel. SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility, 2, 1963–1973.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, A. T. 2021. Internal Combustion Engines: Applied Thermosciences, 4th ed., Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Knoll, K., West, B., Clark, W., Graves, R., Orban, J., Przesmitzki, S. & Theiss, T. 2009. Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 – Updated. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Report No.: NREL/TP-540-43543.Google Scholar

Knothe, G. 2010. Biodiesel and renewable diesel: A comparison. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 36, 364–373.Google Scholar

Knothe, G. & Razon, L. F. 2017. Biodiesel fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 58, 36–59.Google Scholar

Kouremenos, D. A., Hountalas, D. T. & Kouremenos, A. D. 1999. Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Fuel Composition on the Formation of Pollutants in Direct Injection Diesel Engines. SAE Technical Paper, 1999-01-0189.Google Scholar

Kremer, F., Heuser, B. & Pischinger, S. 2015. Furanoids. Biofuels from Lignocellulosic Biomass: Innovations beyond Bioethanol. Michael Boot (ed.), Wiley-VCH.Google Scholar

Krieck, M., Günther, M., Pischinger, S., Kramer, U. & Thewes, M. 2015. Effects of LPG fuel formulations on knock and pre-ignition behavior of a DI SI engine. SAE International Journal of Engines, 9, 237–251.Google Scholar

Lacey, J., Aditiya, H., Poursadegh, F., Brear, M., Gordon, R., Lakey, C., Butcher, B. & Ryan, S., 2021. Flash vaporization of propane in an optically accessible, directly injected engine. International Journal of Engine Research, 22, 685–696.Google Scholar

Lacey, P. I. & Howell, S. A. 1998. Fuel Lubricity Reviewed. SAE Technical Paper, 982567.Google Scholar

Lacey, P. I. & Westbrook, S. R. 1995. Diesel Fuel Lubricity. SAE Technical Paper, 950248.Google Scholar

Lal, R. 2009. Opportunities and challenges of biofuel production. In Lal, R. & Stewart, B. A. (eds.) Soil Quality and Biofuel Production. CRC Press.Google Scholar

Lance, M., Wereszczak, A., Toops, T. J., Ancimer, R., An, H., Li, J., Rogoski, L., Sindler, P., Williams, A., Ragatz, A. & McCormick, R. L. 2016. Evaluation of fuel-borne sodium effects on a DOC-DPF-SCR heavy-duty engine emission control system: Simulation of full-useful life. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 9, 683–694.Google Scholar

Langholtz, M. H., Stokes, B. J. & Eaton, L. M. 2016. 2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy. U.S. Department of Energy. Report No.: ORNL/TM-2016/160.Google Scholar

Lapuerta, M., Armas, O. & García-Contreras, R. 2009. Effect of ethanol on blending stability and diesel engine emissions. Energy and Fuels, 23, 4343–4354.Google Scholar

Lapuerta, M., Armas, O. & Rodríguez-Fernández, J. 2008. Effect of biodiesel fuels on diesel engine emissions. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34, 198–223.Google Scholar

Lavoie, G. A., Ortiz-Soto, E., Babajimopoulos, A., Martz, J. B. & Assanis, D. N. 2013. Thermodynamic sweet spot for high-efficiency, dilute, boosted gasoline engines. International Journal of Engine Research, 14, 260–278.Google Scholar

Lee, R., Pedley, J. & Hobbs, C. 1998. Fuel Quality Impact on Heavy Duty Diesel Emissions: A Literature Review. SAE Technical Paper, 982649.Google Scholar

Lee, S., Oh, S., Choi, Y. & Kang, K. 2011. Effect of n-butane and propane on performance and emission characteristics of an SI engine operated with DME-blended LPG fuel. Fuel, 90, 1674–1680.Google Scholar

Lee, U., Han, J., Wang, M., Ward, J., Hicks, E., Goodwin, D., Boudreaux, R., Hanarp, P., Salsing, H., Desai, P. and Varenne, E., Klintbom, P., Willems, W., Winkler, S. L., Maas, H., De Kleine, R., Hansen, J., Shim, T. & Furusjö, E. 2016. Well-to-wheels emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants of dimethyl ether from natural gas and renewable feedstocks in comparison with petroleum gasoline and diesel in the United States and Europe. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 9, 546–557.Google Scholar

Lhuillier, C., Brequigny, P., Contino, F. & Rousselle, C., 2019. Combustion Characteristics of Ammonia in a Modern Spark-Ignition Engine. SAE Technical Paper, 2019-24-0237Google Scholar

Li, C., Zhao, X., Wang, A., Huber, G. W. & Zhang, T. 2015. Catalytic transformation of lignin for the production of chemicals and fuels. Chemical Reviews, 115, 11559–11624.Google Scholar

Lichty, L. C. 1967. Combustion Engine Processes (ed.), McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Lilik, G. K. & Boehman, A. L. 2011. Advanced diesel combustion of a high cetane number fuel with low hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions. Energy and Fuels, 25, 1444–1456.Google Scholar

Lilik, G. K. & Boehman, A. L. 2013a. Effects of fuel composition on critical equivalence ratio for autoignition. Energy and Fuels, 27, 1601–1612.Google Scholar

Lilik, G. K. & Boehman, A. L. 2013b. Effects of fuel ignition quality on critical equivalence ratio for autoignition. Energy and Fuels, 27, 1586–1600.Google Scholar

Lilik, G. K., Zhang, H., Herreros, J. M., Haworth, D. C. & Boehman, A. L. 2010. Hydrogen assisted diesel combustion. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35, 4382–4398.Google Scholar

Liotta, F. J. Jr & Montalvo, D. M. 1993. The Effect of Oxygenated Fuels on Emissions from a Modern Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine. SAE Technical Papers, 932734.Google Scholar

Mansfield, A. B., Chapman, E. & Briscoe, K. 2016. Impact of Fuel Octane Rating and Aromatic Content on Stochastic Pre-Ignition. SAE Technical Paper, 2016-01-0721.Google Scholar

Martin, J. & Boehman, A. Mapping the combustion modes of a dual-fuel compression ignition engine. International Journal of Engine Research. 2022;23(9):1453–1474.Google Scholar

May, M. P., Vertin, K., Ren, S., Gui, X., Myburgh, I. & Schaberg, P. 2001. Development of Truck Engine Technologies for Use with Fischer-Tropsch Fuels. SAE Technical Paper, 2001-01-3520.Google Scholar

Mayo, M. P. & Boehman, A. L. 2015. Ignition behavior of biodiesel and diesel under reduced oxygen atmospheres. Energy and Fuels, 29, 6793–6803.Google Scholar

Mazacioglu, A., Gross, M. C., Kern, J. & Sick, V. 2019. Infrared borescopic characterization of corona and conventional ignition for lean/dilute combustion in heavy-duty natural-gas engines. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 37, 4993–5001.Google Scholar

Mccandless, J. C. & Li, S. 1997. Development of a Novel Fuel Injection System (NFIS) for Dimethyl Ether and Other Clean Alternative Fuels. SAE Technical Paper, 970220.Google Scholar

Mccandless, J. C., Teng, H. & Schneyer, J. B. 2000. Development of a Variable-Displacement, Rail-Pressure Supply Pump for Dimethyl Ether. SAE Technical Paper, 2000-01-0687.Google Scholar

McCormick, R. L., Fioroni, G., Fouts, L. , Christensen, E., Yanowitz, J., Polikarpov, E., Albrecht, K., Gaspar, D. J., Gladden, J. & George, A. 2017. Selection criteria and screening of potential biomass-derived streams as fuel blendstocks for advanced spark-ignition engines. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 10(2), 442–460.Google Scholar

Mcmillian, M. H. & Gautam, M. 1998. Consideration for Fischer-Tropsch Derived Liquid Fuels as a Fuel Injection Emission Control Parameter. SAE Technical Papers, 982489.Google Scholar

Miyamoto, N., Ogawa, H. & Nabi, M. N. 2000. Approaches to extremely low emissions and efficient diesel combustion with oxygenated fuels. International Journal of Engine Research, 1, 71–85.Google Scholar

Miyamoto, N., Ogawa, H., Nurun, N. M., Obata, K. & Arima, T. 1998. Smokeless, Low NOx, High Thermal Efficiency, and Low Noise Diesel Combustion with Oxygenated Agents as Main Fuel. SAE Technical Paper, 980506.Google Scholar

Mondt, J. R. 2000. Cleaner Cars: The History and Technology of Emission Control Since the 1960s, (ed.), Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.Google Scholar

Mounaïm-Rousselle, C. & Brequigny, P. 2020. Ammonia as fuel for low-carbon spark-ignition engines of tomorrow’s passenger cars. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 6, 70.Google Scholar

Mueller, C. J., Boehman, A. L. & Martin, G. C. 2009. An experimental investigation of the origin of increased NOx emissions when fueling a heavy-duty compression-ignition engine with soy biodiesel. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 2, 789–816.Google Scholar

Mueller, C. J. & Musculus, M. P. 2001. Glow Plug Assisted Ignition and Combustion of Methanol in an Optical DI Diesel Engine. SAE Technical Papers, 2001-01-2004.Google Scholar

Mumford, D., Goudie, D. & Saunders, J. 2017. Potential and Challenges of HPDI. SAE Technical Papers, 2017-01-1928.Google Scholar

Murayama, T., Chikahisa, T. & Guo, J. 1992. A Study of a Compression Ignition Methanol Engine with Converted Dimethyl Ether as an Ignition Improver. SAE Technical Paper, 922212.Google Scholar

Murphy, M. J. 1999. Safety and Industrial Hygiene Issues Related to the Use of Oxygenates in Diesel Fuel. SAE Technical Paper, 1999-01-1473.Google Scholar

Natarajan, M., Frame, E. A., Naegeli, D. W., Asmus, T., Clark, W., Garbak, J., González, D, M. A., Liney, E., Piel, W. & Wallace III, J. P. 2001. Oxygenates for Advanced Petroleum-Based Diesel Fuels: Part 1. Screening and Selection Methodology for the Oxygenates. SAE Technical Paper, 2001-01-3631.Google Scholar

National Research Council 1990. Fuels to Drive Our Future, (ed.), National Academy Press.Google Scholar

National Science Foundation 2008. Breaking the Chemical and Engineering Barriers to Lignocellulosic Biofuels: Next Generation Hydrocarbon Biorefineries. National Science Foundation. Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems Division.; 2008.Google Scholar

Nealer, R., Reichmuth, D. & Anair, D. 2015. Cleaner Cars from Cradle to Grave: How Electric Cars Beat Gasoline Cars on Lifetime Global Warming Emissions. Available: www.ucsusa.org/EVlifecycle.Google Scholar

Nieman, D.E., Dempsey, A.B. and Reitz, R.D., 2012. Heavy-duty RCCI operation using natural gas and diesel. SAE International Journal of Engines, 5(2), pp.270–285.Google Scholar

Nitschke, R. G. 1993. Reactivity of SI Engine Exhaust Under Steady-State and Simulated Cold-Start Operating Conditions. SAE Technical Paper, 932704.Google Scholar

Nylund, N.-O., Murtonen, T., Westerholm, M., Söderström, C., Huhtisaari, T. & Singh, G. 2016. Testing of Various Fuel and Additive Options in a Compression-Ignited Heavy-Duty Alcohol Engine. International Energy Agency; 2016.Google Scholar

Obert, E. F. 1973. Internal Combustion Engines and Air Pollution, 3rd ed., Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Ochoterena, R. & Denbratt, I. 2009. Performance of a Heavy Duty DME Engine: The Influence of Nozzle Parameters on Combustion and Spray Development. SAE Technical Paper, 2009-01-0841.Google Scholar

Oh, S., Lee, S., Choi, Y., Kang, K. Y., Cho, J. & Cha, K. 2010. Combustion and Emission Characteristics in a Direct Injection LPG/Gasoline Spark Ignition Engine. SAE Technical Papers, 2010-01-1461.Google Scholar

Oh, S. H. & Bissett, E. J. 1993. Mathematical Modeling of Monolith Warmup Behavior in Variable-Fuel Vehicle Exhaust. SAE Technical Paper, 932721.Google Scholar

Okada, M., Fujimoto, Y., Ogawa, T. & Araga, T. 1995. Fuel Effects on Particulate Emissions from D. I. Engine: Chemical Analysis and Characterization of Diesel Fuel. SAE Technical Paper, 952351.Google Scholar

Olah, G. A., Goeppert, A. & Prakash, G. K. S. 2009. Chemical recycling of carbon dioxide to methanol and dimethyl ether: From greenhouse gas to renewable, environmentally carbon neutral fuels and synthetic hydrocarbons. The Journal of Organic Chemistry, 74, 487–498.Google Scholar

Olofsson, M., Löfvenberg, U. & Lif, A. 2009. Ethanol Fuel for Diesel Engines: A Sustainable Fuel for the Future. American Chemical Society National Meeting; Division of Fuel Chemistry; Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Pangborn, J. B. & Gregory, D. P. 1976. Hydrogen energy technology – update 1976. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1, 331–340.Google Scholar

Panzer, J. 1983. Characteristics of Primed Methanol Fuels for Passenger Cars. SAE Technical Paper, 831687.Google Scholar

Park, S. H. & Lee, C. S. 2013. Combustion performance and emission reduction characteristics of automotive DME engine system. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 39, 147–168.Google Scholar

Penn, I. & Lipton, E. 2021. The Lithium Gold Rush: Inside the Race to Power Electric Vehicles. New York Times [Online]. Available: www.nytimes.com/2021/05/06/business/lithium-mining-race.html [Accessed August 6, 2021].Google Scholar

Pepiot-Desjardins, P., Pitsch, H., Malhotra, R., Kirby, S. R. & Boehman, A. L. 2008. Structural group analysis for soot reduction tendency of oxygenated fuels. Combustion and Flame, 154, 191–205.Google Scholar

Pidol, L., Lecointe, B. & Jeuland, N. 2009. Ethanol as a Diesel Base Fuel: Managing the Flash Point Issue – Consequences on Engine Behavior. SAE Technical Papers, 2009-01-1807.Google Scholar

Pidol, L., Lecointe, B., Starck, L. & Jeuland, N. 2012. Ethanol-biodiesel-diesel fuel blends: Performances and emissions in conventional diesel and advanced low temperature combustions. Fuel, 93, 329–338.Google Scholar

Pimentel, D. 2009. Corn and cellulosic Ethanol problems and soil erosion. In Lal, R. & Stewart, B. A. (eds.) Soil Quality and Biofuel Production. CRC Press.Google Scholar

Preuss, J. K., Munch, K., Andersson, M. & Denbratt, I. 2019. Comparison of Long-Chain Alcohol Blends, HVO and Diesel on Spray Characteristics, Ignition and Soot Formation. SAE Technical Paper, 2019-01-0018.Google Scholar

Reitz, R. D., Ogawa, H., Payri, R., Fansler, T., Kokjohn, S., Moriyoshi, Y., Agarwal, A.K., Arcoumanis, D., Assanis, D., Bae, C., Boulouchos, K., Canakci, M., Curran, S., Denbratt, I., Gavaises, M., Guenthner, M., Hasse, C., Huang, Z., Ishiyama, T. … Zhao, H. 2020. IJER editorial: The future of the internal combustion engine. International Journal of Engine Research, 21, 3–10.Google Scholar

Rhead, M. M. & Hardy, S. A. 2003. The sources of polycyclic aromatic compounds in diesel engine emissions. Fuel, 82, 385–393.Google Scholar

Rhead, M. M. & Pemberton, R. D. 1996. Sources of naphthalene in diesel exhaust emissions. Energy and Fuels, 10, 837–843.Google Scholar

Robert Bosch Gmbh 2000. Automotive Handbook, 5th ed., Robert Bosch GmbH.Google Scholar

Román-Leshkov, Y., Barrett, C. J., Liu, Z. Y. & Dumesic, J. A. 2007. Production of dimethylfuran for liquid fuels from biomass-derived carbohydrates. Nature, 447, 982–985.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, M. L. & Bendinsky, T. 1993. The Effects of Fuel Properties and Chemistry on the Emissions and Heat Release of Low-Emission Heavy Duty Diesel Engines. SAE Technical Paper, 932800.Google Scholar

Rounce, P., Tsolakis, A. & York, A. P. E. 2012. Speciation of particulate matter and hydrocarbon emissions from biodiesel combustion and its reduction by aftertreatment. Fuel, 96, 90–99.Google Scholar

Ryan, T. W., Buckingham, J. & Dodge, L. G. 1998. The Effects of Fuel Properties on Emissions from a 2.5gm NOx Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine. SAE Technical Paper, 982491.Google Scholar

Ryan, T. W., Erwin, J., Mason, R. L. & Moulton, D. S. 1994. Relationships between Fuel Properties and Composition and Diesel Engine Combustion Performance and Emissions. SAE Technical Paper, 941018.Google Scholar

Saccullo, M., Nygren, A., Benham, T. & Denbratt, I. 2021. Alcohol flexible HD single cylinder diesel engine tests with separate dual high pressure direct fuel injection. Fuel, 294, p.120478.Google Scholar

Salmonsson, P. 2010. BioDME Project Status Update. 4th International DME Conference; International DME Association; Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar

Sasaki, S., Kato, M., Yokota, T., Konno, M. & Gill, D. 2015. An Experimental Study of Injection and Combustion with Dimethyl Ether. SAE Technical Paper, 2015-01-0932.Google Scholar

Schaberg, P. W., Myburgh, I. S., Botha, J. J., Roets, P. N. & Viljoen, C. L. 1997. Diesel Exhaust Emissions Using Sasol Slurry Phase Distillate Process Fuels. SAE Technical Paper, 972898.Google Scholar

Schaberg, P. W., Zarling, D. D., Waytulonis, R. W. & Kittelson, D. B. 2002. Exhaust Particle Number and Size Distributions with Conventional and Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Fuels. SAE Technical Paper, 2002-01-2727.Google Scholar

Schobert, H. H. 2014. Energy and Society: An Introduction, 2nd ed., Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D. & Yu, T. H. 2008. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science, 319, 1238–1240.Google Scholar

Searle, S. 2020. E-fuels won’t save the internal combustion engine. Available: https://theicct.org/blog/staff/e-fuels-will-not-save-ice [Accessed August 6, 2021].Google Scholar

Semelsberger, T. A., Borup, R. L. & Greene, H. L. 2006. Dimethyl ether (DME) as an alternative fuel. Journal of Power Sources, 156, 497–511.Google Scholar

Shamun, S., Haşimoğlu, C., Murcak, A., Andersson, Ö., Tunér, M. & Tunestål, P. 2017. Experimental investigation of methanol compression ignition in a high compression ratio HD engine using a Box-Behnken design. Fuel, 209, 624–633.Google Scholar

Shapouri, H., Duffield, J. A. & Wang, M. 2002. The Energy Balance of Corn Ethanol: An Update. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No.: 813.Google Scholar

Sharp, C. A., Howell, S. A. & Jobe, J. 2000a. The Effect of Biodiesel Fuels on Transient Emissions from Modern Diesel Engines, Part I Regulated Emissions and Performance. SAE Technical Paper, 2000-01-1967.Google Scholar

Sharp, C. A., Howell, S. A. & Jobe, J. 2000b. The Effect of Biodiesel Fuels on Transient Emissions from Modern Diesel Engines, Part II Unregulated Emissions and Chemical Characterization. SAE Technical Papers, 2000-01-1968.Google Scholar

Shere, J. 2013. Renewable: The World-Changing Power of Alternative Energy, (ed.), St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Siebers, D. L. 1998. Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays. SAE Technical Paper, 980809.Google Scholar

Singal, S. K., Singh, I. P., Pandey, D. C., Runda, M. K., Semwal, P. B. & Gandhi, K. K. 1999. Fuel Quality Requirements for Reduction of Diesel Emissions. SAE Technical Paper, 1999-01-3592.Google Scholar

Sinigaglia, T., Lewiski, F., Santos Martins, M. E. & Mairesse Siluk, J. C. 2017. Production, storage, fuel stations of hydrogen and its utilization in automotive applications: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42, 24597–24611.Google Scholar

Sivebaek, I. M. & Sorenson, S. C. 2000. Dimethyl Ether (DME) – Assessment of Lubricity Using the Medium Frequency Pressurised Reciprocating Rig Version 2 (MFPRR2). SAE Technical Paper, 2000-01-2970.Google Scholar

Song, J., Alam, M., Boehman, A. L. & Kim, U. 2006. Examination of the oxidation behavior of Biodiesel soot. Combustion and Flame, 146, 589–604.Google Scholar

Sorenson, S. C. & Mikkelsen, S.-E. 1995. Performance and Emissions of a 0.273 Liter Direct Injection Diesel Engine Fuelled with Neat Dimethyl Ether. SAE Technical Paper, 950064.Google Scholar

Splitter, D., Boronat, V., Chuahy, F. D. F. & Storey, J. 2021. Performance of direct injected propane and gasoline in a high stroke-to-bore ratio SI engine: Pathways to diesel efficiency parity with ultra low soot. International Journal of Engine Research, 22(12), 3475–3488.Google Scholar

Sripad, S. & Viswanathan, V. 2017. Performance metrics required of next-generation batteries to make a practical electric semi truck. ACS Energy Letters, 2, 1669–1673.CrossRef Google Scholar

Starkman, E. S., Newhall, H. K., Sutton, R., Maguire, T. & Farbar, L. 1966. Ammonia as a Spark Ignition Engine Fuel: Theory and Application. SAE Technical Paper, 660155.Google Scholar

Stein, Y., Yetter, R. A., Dryer, F. L. & Aradi, A. 1999. The Autoignition Behavior of Surrogate Diesel Fuel Mixtures and the Chemical Effects of 2-Ethylhexyl Nitrate (2-EHN) Cetane Improver. SAE Technical Paper, 1999-01-1504.Google Scholar

Sugiyama, K., Kajiwara, M., Iwama, M., Mori, M., Oguma, M., Kinoshita, K., Goto, S. (2003) “Performance and Emissions of a DI diesel engine Operated with LPG and Cetane Enhancing additives,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1920.Google Scholar

Sun, J., Caton, J. A. & Jacobs, T. J. 2010. Oxides of nitrogen emissions from biodiesel-fuelled diesel engines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 36, 677–695.CrossRef Google Scholar

Swain, M. R., Yusuf, M. J., Dülger, Z. & Swain, M. N. 1993. The Effects of Hydrogen Addition on Natural Gas Engine Operation. SAE Technical Paper, 932775.Google Scholar

Takei, Y., Fujimoto, Y. & Matsudaira, J. 1995. The Effects of Fuel Properties and Oxygenates on Diesel Exhaust Emissions. SAE Technical Paper, 952349.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. F. & Taylor, E. S. 1970. The Internal-Combustion Engine (ed.), International Textbook Company.Google Scholar

Theiss, T. J., Alleman, T., Brooker, A., Elgowainy, A., Fioroni, G., Han, J., Huff, S. P., Johnson, C., Kass, M. D., Leiby, P. N., Martinez, R. U., McCormick, R., Moriarty, K., Newes, E., Oladosu, G. A., Szybist, J. P., Thomas, J. F., Wang, M. & West, B. H. 2016. Summary of High-Octane, Mid-Level Ethanol Blends Study. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Report No.: ORNL/TM-2016/42.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. F. & Staunton, R. H. 1999. What Fuel Economy Improvement Technologies Could Aid the Competitiveness of Light-Duty Natural Gas Vehicles? SAE Technical Paper, 1999-01-1511.Google Scholar

Times, N. Y. 1925. Ford Predicts Fuel from Vegetation. The New York Times, Sunday, September 20.Google Scholar

Topinka, J. A., Gerty, M. D., Heywood, J. B. & Keck, J. C. 2004. Knock Behavior of a Lean-Burn, H₂ and CO Enhanced, SI Gasoline Engine Concept. SAE Technical Paper, 2004-01-0975.Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Energy. 2021. Alternative Fuels Data Center – Propane Vehicles [Online]. Available: https://afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/propane.html [Accessed July 21, 2021].Google Scholar

U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2021a. Annual Energy Outlook. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2021b. Renewable & Alternative Fuels – Alternative Fuel Vehicle Data [Online]. Available: www.eia.gov/renewable/afv/index.php [Accessed July 2021 Access].Google Scholar

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. The Effect of Cetane Number Increase Due to Additives on NOx Emissions from Heavy-Duty Highway Engines. Report No.: EPA420-R-03-002.Google Scholar

Ullman, T. L., Spreen, K. B. & Mason, R. L. 1994. Effects of Cetane Number, Cetane Improver, Aromatics, and Oxygenates on 1994 Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Emissions. SAE Technical Paper, 941020.Google Scholar

Ullman, W. 1931. Motor Cars Out of the Soil: Ford’s Plan to Raise Cantaloupes for Alcohol Suggests Further Use of Vegetable Products in Manufacture of Cars. The New York Times, August 2, 1931.Google Scholar

Varde, K. S. & Frame, G. A. 1983. Hydrogen aspiration in a direct injection type diesel engine: Its effects on smoke and other engine performance parameters. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 8, 549–555.Google Scholar

Trucks, Volvo. 2021. VNR Electric Truck Specifications [Online]. Available: www.volvotrucks.us/trucks/vnr-electric/specifications/ [Accessed September 17, 2021].Google Scholar

Wallner, T. 2011. Efficiency and Emissions Potential of Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles. SAE Technical Paper, 2011-26-0003.Google Scholar

Walter, L., Sommermann, A., Hyna, D., Malischewski, T., Leistner, M., Hinrichsen, F., Wöhner, P., Schmitt, J. & McMackin, M. 2021. The H₂ Combustion Engine – The Forerunner of a Zero Emissions Future. 42nd International Vienna Motor Symposium 2021; Austrian Society of Automotive Engineers, 2021-06; Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar

Wang, Q., Sperling, D. & Olmstead, J. 1993. Emission Control Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative-Fuel Vehicles. SAE Technical Paper, 931841.Google Scholar

Williams, A., Mccormick, R. L., Hayes, R. R., Ireland, J. & Fang, H. L. 2006. Effect of Biodiesel Blends on Diesel Particulate Filter Performance. SAE Technical Paper, 2006-01-3280.Google Scholar

Williams, R. L., Lipari, F. & Potter, R. A. 1990. Formaldehyde, methanol and hydrocarbon emissions from methanol-fueled cars. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 40, 747–756.Google Scholar

Yamane, K. 2018. Hydrogen Fueled ICE, Successfully Overcoming Challenges through High Pressure Direct Injection Technologies: 40 Years of Japanese Hydrogen ICE Research and Development. SAE Technical Paper, 2018-01-1145.Google Scholar

Zaccardi, J.-M. & Pilla, G. 2020. Hydrogen as a combustion enhancer for highly efficient ultra-lean spark-ignition engines. SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility, 2, 401–414.Google Scholar

Book contents

3 - Reciprocating Engines

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive