Anachronistic as it might seem, Early Modern authors wrestled with several of the issues at the center of ecocriticism including humanity's relation to non-human nature and the potentially destructive effects that human activities can have on ecology. As one critic notes,

It is arguable that the expulsion of both divinity and humanity from nature can be traced to thinkers of the Early Modern period whose works created a context in which nature became the object of a rational, mechanistic science and shaped the anthropocentric direction of modernity. Our ecological crisis developed against this background that separated culture from nature, subject from object and material bodies from a transcendent God.

It should not be surprising then, to find insightful reflections on ecological questions in the works of Early Modern authors. But instead of merely applying ecocritical tools to reread those texts— which in itself carries its own significance—it might be fruitful to try to explore what those Early Modern texts can add to our current conversations. Accordingly, in what follows, I will read Panurge's praise of debts and the praise of Pantagruelion from François Rabelais's Tiers livre in conversation with contemporary ecocritics whose work seems to resonate with his text and style.

For example, Timothy Morton's insistence that we address our ecological crisis through laughter and play resonates with Rabelais's comic style. Similarly, Rabelais's meditation on debt and the bonds that it forms finds echoes in Michel Serres's and Bruno Latour's interest in reconfiguring and expanding our understanding of how we are bound to other humans and also to nature.