Remote Compositional Analysis Techniques for Understanding Spectroscopy, Mineralogy, and Geochemistry of Planetary Surfaces
Book contents
- Remote Compositional Analysis
- Cambridge Planetary Science
- Remote Compositional Analysis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Theory of Remote Compositional Analysis Techniques and Laboratory Measurements
- 1 Electronic Spectra of Minerals in the Visible and Near-Infrared Regions
- 2 Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy of Geologic Materials in the Visible and Infrared Regions
- 3 Mid-infrared (Thermal) Emission and Reflectance Spectroscopy
- 4 Visible and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy
- 5 Spectroscopy of Ices, Volatiles, and Organics in the Visible and Infrared Regions
- 6 Raman Spectroscopy
- 7 Mössbauer Spectroscopy
- 8 Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
- 9 Neutron, Gamma-Ray, and X-Ray Spectroscopy
- 10 Radar Remote Sensing
- Part II Terrestrial Field and Airborne Applications
- Part III Analysis Methods
- Part IV Applications to Planetary Surfaces
- Index
- References
10 - Radar Remote Sensing
Theory and Applications
from Part I - Theory of Remote Compositional Analysis Techniques and Laboratory Measurements
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 November 2019
Book contents
- Remote Compositional Analysis
- Cambridge Planetary Science
- Remote Compositional Analysis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Theory of Remote Compositional Analysis Techniques and Laboratory Measurements
- 1 Electronic Spectra of Minerals in the Visible and Near-Infrared Regions
- 2 Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy of Geologic Materials in the Visible and Infrared Regions
- 3 Mid-infrared (Thermal) Emission and Reflectance Spectroscopy
- 4 Visible and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy
- 5 Spectroscopy of Ices, Volatiles, and Organics in the Visible and Infrared Regions
- 6 Raman Spectroscopy
- 7 Mössbauer Spectroscopy
- 8 Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
- 9 Neutron, Gamma-Ray, and X-Ray Spectroscopy
- 10 Radar Remote Sensing
- Part II Terrestrial Field and Airborne Applications
- Part III Analysis Methods
- Part IV Applications to Planetary Surfaces
- Index
- References
Summary
Imaging radars are all-weather instruments that can image planetary surfaces regardless of local atmospheric or solar illumination conditions. Radar images provide information about surfaces that are complementary to the chemistry usually inferred from visible and infrared images. Instead, radar images are strongly influenced by surface roughness and geomorphology, and to a lesser extent by the bulk electrical properties of the surface. This chapter describes the basic principles of high-resolution synthetic aperture radars (SARs), as well as advanced SAR implementations. Radar polarimetry provides information about surface roughness and electrical properties, while radar interferometry allows the measurement of surface topography and surface deformation following events such as earthquakes or volcanic inflation. Radar imagers have returned spectacular information about the surfaces of both Venus and Titan, bodies with dense, opaque atmospheres that are difficult to image using traditional camera systems. Examples of both planetary and Earth observations with SAR are discussed to illustrate the utility of these images.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Remote Compositional AnalysisTechniques for Understanding Spectroscopy, Mineralogy, and Geochemistry of Planetary Surfaces, pp. 239 - 258Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Dobson, M.C., Ulaby, F.T., Hallikainen, M.T., & El-Rayes, M.A. (1985) Microwave dielectric behavior of wet soil. Part II: Dielectric mixing models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35–46.Google Scholar
Farr, T.G. (1992) Microtopographic evolution of lava flows at Cima Volcanic Field, Mojave Desert, California. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, 15171–15179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr, T.G. & Kobrick, M. (2000) Shuttle radar topography mission produces a wealth of data. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 81, 583–585.Google Scholar
Ford, J.P., Plaut, J.J., Weitz, C.M., et al. (1993) Guide to Magellan image interpretation. Jet Propulsion Laboratory Publications, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
Freeman, A., Krieger, G., Rosen, P., et al. (2009) SweepSAR: Beam-forming on receive using a reflector-phased array feed combination for spaceborne SAR. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Radar Conference, 1–9.Google Scholar
Fung, A.K., Li, Z., & Chen, K.S. (1992) Backscattering from a randomly rough dielectric surface. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30, 356–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, A.K., Goldstein, R.M., & Zebker, H.A. (1989) Mapping small elevation changes over large areas: Differential radar interferometry. Journal of Geophysical Research, 94, 9183–9191.Google Scholar
Harmon, J.K., Slade, M.A., Vélez, R.A., Crespo, A., Dryer, M.J., & Johnson, J.M. (1994) Radar mapping of Mercury’s polar anomalies. Nature, 369, 213–215.Google Scholar
Le Gall, A., Malaska, M.J., Lorenz, R.D., et al. (2016) Composition, seasonal change, and bathymetry of Ligeia Mare, Titan, derived from its microwave thermal emission. Journal of Geophysical Research, 121, 233–251.Google Scholar
Ostro, S.J., Campbell, D.B., Simpson, R.A., et al. (1992) Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto: New radar results from Arecibo and Goldstone. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, 18227–18244.Google Scholar
Peltzer, G. & Rosen, P. (1995) Surface displacement of the 17 May 1993 Eureka Valley, California, earthquake observed by SAR interferometry. Science, 268, 1333–1336.Google Scholar
Peplinski, N.R., Ulaby, F.T., & Dobson, M.C. (1995) Dielectric properties of soils in the 0.3–1.3-GHz range. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33, 803–807.Google Scholar
Pettengill, G.H., Eliason, E., Ford, P.G., Loriot, G.B., Masursky, H., & McGill, G.E. (1980) Pioneer Venus Radar results altimetry and surface properties. Journal of Geophysical Research, 85, 8261–8270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaut, J.J., Safaeinili, A., Holt, J.W., et al. (2009) Radar evidence for ice in lobate debris aprons in the mid-northern latitudes of Mars. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L02203, DOI:10.1029/2008GL036379.Google Scholar
Rosen, P.A., Hensley, S., Joughin, I.R., et al. (2000) Synthetic aperture radar interferometry. Proceedings of the IEEE, 88, 333–382.Google Scholar
Saunders, R.S., Spear, A.J., Allin, P.C., et al. (1992) Magellan mission summary. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, 13067–13090.Google Scholar
Shi, J., Wang, J., Hsu, A.Y., O’Neill, P.E., & Engman, E.T. (1997) Estimation of bare surface soil moisture and surface roughness parameter using L-band SAR image data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35, 1254–1266.Google Scholar
Ulaby, F.T. & Elachi, C.E. (1990) Radar polarimetry for geoscience applications. Artech House, London.Google Scholar
Ulaby, F.T. & Long, D. (2014) Microwave radar and radiometric remote sensing. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, G. (1967) Depolarization of EM waves by slightly rough surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 15, 552–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zyl, J.J. & Kim, Y. (2011) Synthetic aperture radar polarimetry. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zebker, H.A. & Goldstein, R.M. (1986) Topographic mapping from interferometric synthetic aperture radar observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 91, 4993–4999.Google Scholar
Zebker, H.A., van Zyl, J.J., & Held, D.N. (1987) Imaging radar polarimetry from wave synthesis. Journal of Geophysical Research, 92, 683–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zisk, S.H., Pettengill, G.H., & Catuna, G.W. (1974) High-resolution radar maps of the lunar surface at 3.8-cm wavelength. The Moon, 10, 17–50.Google Scholar