Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:05:08.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Relational Networks and Religious Sodalities at Çatalhöyük

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Ian Hodder
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Çatalhöyük is often compared to the Pueblos of the North American Southwest. As someone whose work largely focuses on Ancestral Pueblo archaeology, I was intrigued by the possibility of comparing these two areas. My initial reaction upon walking around the site of Çatalhöyük was that it was nothing like the pueblos or the Pueblos of the Southwest. One of the most obvious differences is that the buildings do not share walls, leaving a gap between instead of the villages formed by contiguous rooms that define the aggregated pueblos in the northern Southwest. Buildings at Çatalhöyük were reproduced in the same spaces, creating columns of rooms over time with seemingly little articulation between them. In addition, plazas and other public spaces are difficult to discern, spaces that among the Pueblos are the central focus of villagewide activities. Last is the apparent absence of suprahousehold religious spaces – a paradox that marks Çatalhöyük as different from other Neolithic Anatolian villages as well as from prehispanic and historic Pueblo villages in the Southwest.

The more that I became engaged with the archaeology of Çatalhöyük, however, the greater the similarities with Pueblo societies of the Southwest became. What makes them similar are not the specifics of the architecture, imagery, or artifacts, but the way in which religion was a central part of daily life for those living in both areas and how much of this was made clear through people’s interactions with things. At Çatalhöyük, the relationships that people had with other people, animals, plants, buildings, clay, stone, and so on, are evidence for a rich materiality. Like many Southwestern societies, such as the Pueblos, the people who inhabited Çatalhöyük were surrounded by objects and architectural installations that served as reminders of who they were, whom they interacted with, and where they came from. It is the massing of the buildings and the high degree of ritual density (sensu Bell 1997) at Çatalhöyük that make a comparison to the Pueblos of the North American Southwest of interest. In addition, I think that there is much to be learned by such a comparison as a way of looking at how religion shapes relationships, how it intersects with economic and political power, and how relational networks both divide and integrate village societies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society
Vital Matters
, pp. 159 - 186
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, E. C. 1991. The Origin and Development of the Pueblo Katsina Cult. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Adler, M. A. 1989. Ritual facilities and social integration in nonranked societies. In The Architecture of Social Integration in Prehistoric Pueblos, eds. Lipe, W. D. and Hegmon, M.. Cortez, Colorado: Occasional Papers of the Crow Canyon Archaeological Center 1:35–52.Google Scholar
Adler, M. A. 1993. Why Is a Kiva?Journal of Anthropological Research 49(4):319–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D. 2006. The Boncuklu Project: The Origins of Sedentism, Cultivation and Herding in Central Anatolia. Anatolian Archaeology 12:13–16.Google Scholar
Baird, D. 2010. Ancestral Practices: Pınarbaşı, Boncuklu, from the History of ‘History Houses’ to Ritual in the Landscape. Paper presented at the conference on “Religion as the Basis for Power and Property in Ancient Near East,” Çatalhöyük, Turkey.
Baird, D., Carruthers, D., Fairbairn, A., and Pearson, J.. 2011. Ritual in the landscape: Evidence from Pinarbaşi in the Seventh-Millennium cal BC Konya Plain. Antiquity 85(328):380–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, C. M. 1997. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. 2010. Is there religion at Çatalhöyük … or are there just houses? In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 146–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunzel, R. L. 1932. Introduction to Zuni Ceremonialism. 47th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Bunzel, R. L. 1938. The economic organization of primitive peoples. In General Anthropology, ed. Boas, F.. New York: D. C. Heath, 327–408.Google Scholar
Carsten, J., and Hugh-Jones, S., eds. 1995. About the House: Lévi-Strauss and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, T. 2007. Of blanks and burials: Hoarding obsidian at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. In Technical Systems and Near Eastern PPN Communities. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop. Fréjus 2004, eds. Astruc, L., Binder, D., and Briols, F.. Antibes: Éditions APDCA, 343–355.Google Scholar
Cessford, C. 2005. Estimating the Neolithic population at Çatalhöyük. In Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. Çatalhöyük Research Project 4. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 221–284.Google Scholar
Dean, R. M. 2001. Social Change and Hunting during the Pueblo III to Pueblo IV Transition, East-Central Arizona. Journal of Field Archaeology 28(3/4):271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düring, B. S. 2005. Building Continuity in the Central Anatolian Neolithic: Exploring the Meaning of Buildings at Askikli Höyük and Çatalhöyük. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 18:3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düring, B. S. 2007. The articulation of houses at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey. In The Durable House: House Society Models in Archaeology, ed. Beck, R. A., Jr. Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 35. Carbondale: CAI, Southern Illinois University, 130–153.Google Scholar
Düring, B. S. 2011. The Prehistory of Asia Minor: From Complex Hunter-Gatherers to Early Urban Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eggan, F. 1950. Social Organization of the Western Pueblos. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fowles, S. M. 2010. A people’s history of the American Southwest. In Ancient Complexities: New Perspectives in Pre-Columbian North America, ed. Alt, Susan. Provo: University of Utah Press, 183–204.Google Scholar
Fowles, S. M. 2011. The Southwest in the age of reformation. In Handbook of North American Archaeology, ed. Pauketat, T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 631–644.Google Scholar
Gillespie, S. D. 2007. When is a house? In The Durable House: House Society Models in Archaeology, ed. Beck, R. A., Jr. Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 35. Carbondale: CAI, Southern Illinois University, 25–52.Google Scholar
Heitman, C. H. 2007. Houses great and small: Reevaluating the “house” in Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. In The Durable House: House Society Models in Archaeology, ed. Beck, R. A., Jr. Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 35. Carbondale: CAI, Southern Illinois University, 248–272.Google Scholar
Hillson, S. W., Larsen, Clark S., Boz, Başak, Pilloud, Marin A., Sadvari, Joshua W., Agarwal, Sabrina C., Glencross, Bonnie, Beauchesne, Patrick, Pearson, Jessica, Ruff, Christopher B., Garofalo, Evan M., Hager, Lori D., and Haddow, Scott D.. 2013. The human remains I: Interpreting community structure, health and diet in Neolithic Çatalhöyük. In Humans and Landscapes of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons, ed. Hodder, I. Çatalhöyük Research Project Series Volume 8. British Institute at Ankara Monograph No. 47 / Monumenta Archaeologica 30. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2006. The Leopard’s Tale: Revealing the Mysteries of Çatalhöyük. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2010a. Probing religion at Çatalhöyük: An interdisciplinary experiment. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 2011. Human-Thing Entanglement: Towards An Integrated Archaeological Perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17:154–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Human and Things. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 2013. The social geography of Çatalhöyük. In Integrating Çatalhöyük: Themes from the 2000–2008 Seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., ed. 2010. Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., and Cessford, C.. 2004. Daily Practice and Social Memory at Çatalhöyük. American Antiquity 69(1):17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., and Meskell, L. M.. 2010. The symbolism of Çatalhöyük in its regional context. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 32–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., and Pels, P.. 2010. History houses: A new interpretation of architectural elaboration at Çatalhöyük. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R., and Gillespie, S. D., eds. 2000. Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, W. 2010. Marked, absent, habitual: Approaches to Neolithic religion at Çatalhöyük. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knappett, C. 2011. An Archaeology of Interaction: Network Perspectives on Material Culture and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1919. Zuni Kin and Clan. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 18(2):39–204.Google Scholar
Ladd, E. J. 1979. Zuni social and political organization. In Handbook of North American Indians vol. 9, Southwest, ed. Ortiz, A., pp. 482–491. Washington, D.C.: Smithsoinian Institution.Google Scholar
Lave, J., and Wenger, E.. 1991. Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lekson, S. H. 2009. A History of the Ancient Southwest. Santa Fe: SAR Press.Google Scholar
Love, S. 2010. How Houses Build People: An Archaeology of Mudbrick Architecture at Çatalhöyük. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Palo Alto.
McGuire, R. H., and Saitta, D. J.. 1996. Although They Have Petty Captains, They Obey Them Badly: the Dialectics of Prehispanic Western Pueblo Social Organization. American Antiquity 61(2):197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1967. Çatal Hüyük: A Neolithic Town in Anatolia. New York: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Mills, B. J. 2004. The Establishment and Defeat of Hierarchy: Inalienable Possessions and the History of Collective Prestige Structures in the Puebloan Southwest. American Anthropologist 106(2):238–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, B. J. 2008. Remembering while forgetting: Depositional practice and social memory at Chaco. In Memory Work: Archaeologies of Material Practices, eds. Mills, B. J. and Walker, W. H.. Santa Fe: SAR Press, 81–108.Google Scholar
Mills, B. J., and Walker, W. H.. 2008. Introduction: Memory, materiality, and depositional practice. In Memory Work: Archaeologies of Material Practices, eds. Mills, B. J. and Walker, W. H.. Santa Fe: SAR Press, 3–23.Google Scholar
Nakamura, C. 2010. Magical deposits at Çatalhöyük: A matter of time and place? In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 300–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, E. C. 1939. Pueblo Indian Religion. 2 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, J. A., Buitenhuis, H., Hedges, R. E. M., Martin, L., Russell, N., and Twiss, K. C.. 2007. New Light on Early Caprine Herding Strategies from Isotope Analysis: A Case Study from Neolithic Anatolia. Journal of Archaeological Science 34:2170–2179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pels, P. 2010. Temporalities of “religion” at Çatalhöyük. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 220–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilloud, M. A., and Larsen, C. S.. 2011. “Official” and “Practical” Kin: Inferring Social and Community Structure from Dental Phenotype at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 145:519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plog, S., and Solemeto, J.. 1999. The Never-Changing and the Ever-Changing: the Evolution of Western Pueblo Ritual. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7:161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J. M. 2000. Pots, Parties, and Politics: Communal Feasting in the American Southwest. American Antiquity 65:471–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, T. D., and Bar-Yosef, O.. 2010. Traces of inequality at the origins of agriculture in the Ancient Near East. In Pathways to Power, ed. Price, T. D. and Feinman, G. M.. New York: Springer, 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, N., and Martin, L.. 2005. Çatalhöyük mammal remains. In Inhabiting Catalhoyuk: Results from the 1995–1999 Seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 33–98.Google Scholar
Russell, N., Martin, L., and Twiss, K. C.. 2009. Building memories: Commemorative deposits at Çatalhöyük. In Zooarchaeology and the Reconstruction of Cultural Systems: Case Studies from the Old World, eds. Arbuckle, B. S., Makarewicz, C. A., and Atici, A. L.. Anthropozoologica, 1. Paris: L’Homme et l’Animal, Société de Recherche Interdisciplinaire, 103–128.Google Scholar
Schachner, G. 2001. Ritual Control and Transformation in Middle-Range Societies: An Example from the American Southwest. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20:168–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shults, L. 2010. Spiritual entanglement: Transforming religious symbols at Çatalhöyük. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. Hodder, Ian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. 1952. Excavations in Big Hawk Valley, Wupatki National Monument, Arizona. Flagstaff: Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin 24.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M. C. 1904. The Zuni Indians: Their Mythology, Esoteric Fraternities, and Ceremonies. 23rd Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, 1901–1902. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Ur, J. A. 2003. CORONA Satellite Photography and Ancient Road Networks: a Northern Mesopotamian Case Study. Antiquity 77:102–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, J. A. 2002. Descent group and sodality: Alternative Pueblo social histories. In Traditions, Transitions, and Technologies: Themes in Southwestern Archaeology, ed. Schlanger, S. H.. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 94–112.Google Scholar
Ware, J. A., and Blinman, E.. 2000. Cultural collapse and reorganization: The origin and spread of Pueblo ritual sodalities. In The Archaeology of Regional Interaction: Religion, Warfare & Exchange across the American Southwest & Beyond, ed. Hegmon, M.. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 381–409.Google Scholar
Watt, L. 1997. Zuni Family Ties and Household-Group Values: A Revisionist Cultural Model of Zuni Social Organization. Journal of Anthropological Research 53(1):17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, H., and Hodder, I.. 2010. Modes of religiosity at Çatalhöyük. In Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 122–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, P. 1988. Deliberate Acts: Changing Hopi Culture through the Oraibi Split. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, T. 2010. The tell: Social archaeology and territorial space. In The Development of Pre-State Communities in the Ancient Near East: Studies in Honour of Edgar Peltenburg, eds. Bolger, D. and Maguire, L. C.. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 55–62.Google Scholar
Wills, W. H. 2005. Economic competition and agricultural involution in the Precontact North American Southwest. In A Catalyst for Ideas: Anthropological Archaeology and the Legacy of Douglas W. Schwartz, ed. Scarborough, V. L.. Santa Fe: SAR Press, 41–67.Google Scholar
Zedeño, M. N. 2008. Bundled Worlds: The Roles and Interactions of Complex Objects from the North American Plains. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 15:362–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×