Agnew, C. R., & VanderDrift, L. E. (2015). Relationship maintenance and dissolution. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Simpson, J. A., & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 581–604). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Alberts, J. K., Yoshimura, C. G., Rabby, M., & Loschiavo, R. (2005). Mapping the topography of couples’ daily conversation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 299–322. doi:10.1177/0265407505050941Google Scholar

Avtgis, T. A., West, D. V., & Anderson, T. L. (1998). Relationship stages: An inductive analysis identifying cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions of Knapp’s relational stages model. Communication Research Reports, 15, 280–287. doi:10.1080/08824099809362124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayres, J. (1983). Strategies to maintain relationships: Their identification and perceived usage. Communication Quarterly, 31, 62–67.Google Scholar

Baxter, L. A. (1994). A dialogic approach to relational maintenance. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 233–254). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Baxter, L. A., & Dindia, K. (1990). Marital partners’ perceptions of marital maintenance strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 187–208. doi:10.1177/0265407590072003Google Scholar

Baxter, L. A., & Pittman, G. (2001). Communicatively remembering turning points of relational development in heterosexual romantic relationships. Communication Reports, 14, 1–17. doi:10.1080/08934210109367732Google Scholar

Bell, R. A., Daly, J. A., & Gonzalez, M. C. (1987). Affinity-maintenance in marriage and its relationship to women’s marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 445–454.Google Scholar

Braiker, H. B., & Kelley, H. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In Burgess, R. L. & Huston, T. L. (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135–168). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgess, E. W. (1926). The family as a unity of interacting personalities. The Family, 7, 3–9.Google Scholar

Canary, D. J. (2011). On babies, bathwater, and absolute claims: Reply to Stafford. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 304–311. doi:10.1177/0265407510397523Google Scholar

Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243–267. doi:10.1080/03637759209376268Google Scholar

Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1994). Maintaining relationships through strategic and routine interaction. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 3–22). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (2001). Equity in the preservation of personal relationships. In Harvey, J. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 133–151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Canary, D. J., Stafford, L., & Semic, B. A. (2002). A panel study of the associations between maintenance strategies and relational characteristics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 395–406.Google Scholar

Dailey, R. M., Hampel, A. D., & Roberts, J. B. (2010). Relational maintenance in on-again/off-again relationships: An assessment of how relational maintenance, uncertainty, and commitment vary by relationship type and status. Communication Monographs, 77(1), 75–101. doi:10.1080/03637750903514292CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dailey, R. M., Jin, B., Pfiester, A., & Beck, G. (2011). On-again/off-again dating relationships: What keeps partners coming back? The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 417–440.Google Scholar

Dainton, M. (2000). Maintenance behaviors, expectations for maintenance, and satisfaction: Linking comparison levels to relational maintenance strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 827–842. doi:10.1177/0265407500176007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dainton, M. (2017). Equity, equality, and self-interest in marital maintenance. Communication Quarterly, 65, 247–221. doi:10.1080/01463373.2016.1227346CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dainton, M., Goodboy, A. K., Borzea, D., & Goldman, Z. W. (2017). The dyadic effects of relationship uncertainty on negative relational maintenance. Communication Reports, 30, 170–181. doi:10.1080/08934215.2017.1282529CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dainton, M., & Gross, J. (2008). The use of negative behaviors to maintain relationships. Communication Research Reports, 25, 179–191. doi:10.1080/08824090802237600CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dainton, M., & Stafford, L. (1993). Routine maintenance behaviors: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 255–271. doi:10.1177/026540759301000206Google Scholar

Dainton, M., & Stafford, L. (2000). Predicting maintenance enactment from relational schemata, spousal behavior, and relational characteristics. Communication Research Reports, 17, 171–180. doi:10.1080/08824090009388763CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, M. S. (1973). Intimate relations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Denes, A., Dhillon, A., & Speer, A. C. (2017). Relational maintenance strategies during the post sex time interval. Communication Quarterly, 65, 307–332. doi:10.1080/01463373.2016.1245206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dindia, K. (1994). A multiphasic view of relationship maintenance strategies. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 91–112). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Dindia, K. (2003). Definitions and perspectives on relational maintenance communication. In Canary, D. J. & Dainton, M. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual and cultural variations (pp. 1–28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Dindia, K., & Baxter, L. A. (1987). Strategies for maintaining and repairing marital relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 143–158. doi:10.1177/0265407587042003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dindia, K., & Canary, D. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 163–173.Google Scholar

Duck, S. W. (1988). Relating to others. Chicago: Dorsey.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, K. N., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2009). Idiomatic communication in the stages of coming together and falling apart. Communication Quarterly, 57, 416–432. doi:10.1080/01463370903320906Google Scholar

Fincham, F. D. (2010). Forgiveness: Integral to a science of close relationships? In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 347–365). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fincham, F., Hall, J., & Beach, S. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: Current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55, 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Badzinski, D. M. (1985). All in the family: Interpersonal communication in kin relationships. In Knapp, M. L. & Miller, G. R. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 687–736). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Fowler, C., & Gasiorek, J. (2017). Depressive symptoms, excessive reassurance seeking, and relationship maintenance. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 91–113. doi:10.1177/0265407515624265CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (2001). Appetitive and aversive social interaction. In Harvey, J. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 169–194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gilbertson, J., Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1998). Relational continuity constructional units and the maintenance of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(6), 774–790. doi:10.1177/0265407598156004Google Scholar

Girme, Y. U., Overall, N. C., & Faingataa, S. (2014). “Date nights” take two: The maintenance function of shared relationship activities. Personal Relationships, 21, 125–149. doi:10.1111/pere.12020Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual; essays on face-to-face behavior (1st ed.). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gottman, J., & Gottman, J. (2017). The natural principles of love. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9, 7–26. doi:10.1111/jftr.12182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guerrero, L. K., & Bachman, G. F. (2006). Associations among relational maintenance behaviors, attachment-style categories, and attachment dimensions. Communication Studies, 57, 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honeycutt, J. M. (2010). Imagine that: Studies in imagined interactions. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Kalish, N. (2005). Lost & found lovers: Facts and fantasies of rekindled romances. Lincoln: iUniverse.Google Scholar

Knapp, M. L. (1984). Interpersonal communication and human relationships. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Knee, C., Patrick, H., & Lonsbary, C. (2003). Implicit theories of relationships: Orientations toward evaluation and cultivation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 41–55. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701_3Google Scholar

Ledbetter, A. M. (2013). Relational maintenance and inclusion of the other in the self: Measure development and dyadic test of a self-expansion theory approach. The Southern Communication Journal, 78, 289–310. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2013.815265CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ledbetter, A. M. (2017). Relational maintenance behavior and shared TV viewing as mediators of the association between romanticism and romantic relationship quality. Communication Studies, 68, 95–20. doi:10.1080/10510974.2016.1263804Google Scholar

Ledbetter, A. M., Stassen, H., Muhammad, A., & Kotey, E. N. (2010). Relational maintenance as including the other in the self. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 11, 21–28. doi:10.1080/17459430903413457Google Scholar

Ledbetter, A. M., Stassen‐Ferrara, H. M., & Dowd, M. M. (2013). Comparing equity and self‐expansion theory approaches to relational maintenance. Personal Relationships, 20, 38–51.Google Scholar

Levin, D. Z., Walter, J., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Dormant ties: The value of reconnecting. Organization Science, 22, 923–939. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0576CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, J. T., Parra, G. R., & Cohen, R. (2015). Apologies in close relationships: A review of theory and research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7, 47–61. doi:10.1111/jftr.12060Google Scholar

Merolla, A. (2010). Relational maintenance and noncopresence reconsidered: Conceptualizing geographic separation in close relationships. Communication Theory, 20, 169–193. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01359.xGoogle Scholar

Merolla, A. J. (2014). The role of hope in conflict management and relational maintenance. Personal Relationships, 21, 365–386. doi:10.1111/pere.12037Google Scholar

Monk, J. K., Vennum, A. V., Ogolsky, B. G., & Fincham, F. D. (2014). Commitment and sacrifice in emerging adult romantic relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 50, 416–434. doi:10.1080/01494929.2014.896304Google Scholar

Murray, S., Holmes, J., Griffin, D., & Derrick, J. (2015). The equilibrium model of relationship maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 93–113. doi:10.1037/pspi0000004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ogolsky, B. (2009). Deconstructing the association between relationship maintenance and commitment: Testing two competing models. Personal Relationships, 16, 99–115. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01212.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogolsky, B. G., & Bowers, J. R. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 343–367. doi:10.1177/0265407512463338Google Scholar

Ogolsky, B. G., Monk, J. K., Rice, T. M., Theisen, J. C., & Maniotes, C. R. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9, 275–306. doi:10.1111/jftr.12205Google Scholar

Parks, M. (1982). Ideology in interpersonal communication: Off the couch and into the world. In Burgoon, M. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 5 (pp. 79–107). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Pauley, P. M., Hesse, C., & Mikkelson, A. C. (2014). Trait affection predicts married couples’ use of relational maintenance behaviors. Journal of Family Communication, 14, 167–187.Google Scholar

Perlman, D. (2001). Maintaining and enhancing relationships: Concluding commentary. In Harvey, J. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 357–378). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Proulx, C. M., Ermer, A. E., & Kanter, J. B. (2017). Group‐based trajectory modeling of marital quality: A critical review. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(3), 307–327.Google Scholar

Pytlak, M. A., Zerega, L. M., & Houser, M. L. (2015). Jealousy evocation: Understanding commitment, satisfaction, and uncertainty as predictors of jealousy-evoking behaviors. Communication Quarterly, 63, 310–328. doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1039716Google Scholar

Ragsdale, J. D., & Brandau-Brown, F. E. (2005). Individual differences in the use of relational maintenance strategies in marriage. Journal of Family Communication, 5, 61–75. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0501_4Google Scholar

Ramirez, A., & Bryant, E. M. (2014). Relational reconnection on social network sites: An examination of relationship persistence and modality switching. Communication Reports, 27, 1–12. doi:10.1080/08934215.2013.851725Google Scholar

Ramirez, A., Sumner, E. M., & Spinda, J. (2017). The relational reconnection function of social network sites. New Media & Society, 19, 807–825. doi:10.1177/1461444815614199Google Scholar

Rawlins, W. K. (1994). Being there and growing apart: Sustaining friendships during adulthood. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 275–294). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Roloff, M. E. (1981). Interpersonal communication: The social exchange approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Romanoff, B. D. (1998). Rituals and the grieving process. Death Studies, 22, 697–711. doi:10.1080/074811898201227Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., & Verette, J. (1994). The investment model: An interdependence analysis of commitment processes and relationship maintenance phenomena. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 114–140). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schoenfeld, E. A., Bredow, C. A., & Huston, T. L. (2012). Do men and women show love differently in marriage? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1396–1409. doi:10.1177/0146167212450739Google Scholar

Sigman, S. J. (1991). Handling the discontinuous aspects of continuous social relationships: Toward research on the persistence of social forms. Communication Theory, 1, 106–127. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1991.tb00008.xGoogle Scholar

Spanier, G. B., & Lewis, R. A. (1980). Marital quality: A review of the seventies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 42, 825–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stafford, L. (1994). Tracing the threads of spider webs. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 297–306). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Stafford, L. (2003). Definitions and perspectives on relational maintenance communication. In Canary, D. J. & Dainton, M. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual and cultural variations (pp. 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Stafford, L. (2005). Maintaining long-distance and cross-residential relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Stafford, L. (2011). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 278–303. doi:10.1177/0265407510378125Google Scholar

Stafford, L. (2016). Marital sanctity, relationship maintenance, and marital quality. Journal of Family Issues, 37, 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242. doi:10.1177/0265407591082004Google Scholar

Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (2006). Equity and interdependence as predictors of relational maintenance strategies. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 227–254. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0604_1Google Scholar

Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67, 306–323. doi:10.1080/03637750009376512Google Scholar

Stanley, S. M., Whitton, S. W., Sadberry, S. L., Clements, M. L., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sacrifice as a predictor of marital outcomes. Family Process, 45, 289–303.Google Scholar

Stewart, M. C., Dainton, M., & Goodboy, A. K. (2014). Maintaining relationships on Facebook: Associations with uncertainty, jealousy, and satisfaction. Communication Reports, 27, 13–26. doi:10.1080/08934215.2013.845675Google Scholar

Waldron, V. R., & Kelley, D. L. (2008). Communicating forgiveness. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Weigel, D. J. (2008). A dyadic assessment of how couples indicate their commitment to each other. Personal Relationships, 15, 17–39. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00182.xGoogle Scholar

Weigel, D. J., & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (2014). Constructing commitment in intimate relationships: Mapping interdependence in the everyday expressions of commitment. Communication Research, 41, 311–332. doi:10.1177/0093650212440445Google Scholar

Weigel, D. J., Lalasz, C. B., & Weiser, D. A. (2016). Maintaining relationships: The role of implicit relationship theories and partner fit. Communication Reports, 29, 23–34. doi:10.1080/08934215.2015.1017653CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weigel, D. J., Weiser, D. A., & Lalasz, C. B. (2017). Testing a motivational model of relationship maintenance: The role of approach and avoidance relationship goals. Western Journal of Communication, 81, 341–361. doi:10.1080/10570314.2016.1240372CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilmot, W. W. (1994). Relationship rejuvenation. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 255–273). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Wilmot, W. W. (1995). Relational communication (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Yamaguchi, M., Smith, A., & Ohtsubo, Y. (2015). Commitment signals in friendship and romantic relationships. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 467–474.Google Scholar

Yoshimura, C. G., & Alberts, J. K. (2008). Television viewing and relational maintenance. In Moyrly, T. (Ed.), Studies in applied interpersonal communication (pp. 287–307). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Ackermann, R., & DeRubeis, R. J. (1991). Is depressive realism real? Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 565–584.Google Scholar

Algoe, S. B. (2012). Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(6), 455–469.Google Scholar

Algoe, S. B., & Zhaoyang, R. (2016). Positive psychology in context: Effects of expressing gratitude in ongoing relationships depend on perceptions of enactor responsiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(4), 399–415.Google Scholar

Algoe, S. B., Gable, S. L., & Maisel, N. C. (2010). It’s the little things: Everyday gratitude as a booster shot for romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 217–233.Google Scholar

Algoe, S. B., Haidt, J., & Gable, S. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8(3), 425.Google Scholar

Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–485.Google Scholar

Baker, L. R., & McNulty, J. K. (2011). Self-compassion and relationship maintenance: The moderating roles of conscientiousness and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 853.Google Scholar

Balliet, D., Li, N. P., & Joireman, J. (2011). Relating trait self-control and forgiveness within prosocials and proselfs: Compensatory versus synergistic models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 1090.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (1989). The optimal margin of illusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 176–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 119.Google Scholar

Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 3.Google Scholar

Buck, A. A., & Neff, L. A. (2012). Stress spillover in early marriage: The role of self-regulatory depletion. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(5), 698.Google Scholar

Christensen, A., Atkins, D. C., Yi, J., Baucom, D. H., & George, W. H. (2006). Couple and individual adjustment for 2 years following a randomized clinical trial comparing traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(6), 1180.Google Scholar

Colvin, C. R., Block, J., & Funder, D. C. (1995). Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1152.Google Scholar

Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In Gilbert, D. T. & Fiske, S. T. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 504–533). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Dillard, A. J., McCaul, K. D., & Klein, W. M. (2006). Unrealistic optimism in smokers: Implications for smoking myth endorsement and self-protective motivation. Journal of Health Communication, 11(S1), 93–102.Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2014). The MODE model: Attitude–behavior processes as a function of motivation and opportunity. In Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 155–171). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027.Google Scholar

Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: Implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Personal Relationships, 9(3), 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fincham, F., & Beach, S. R. (2007). Forgiveness and marital quality: Precursor or consequence in well-established relationships? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(4), 260–268.Google Scholar

Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., & Davila, J. (2004). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 72–81.Google Scholar

Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., & Davila, J. (2007). Longitudinal relations between forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(3), 542–545.Google Scholar

Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1987). The assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 797–809.Google Scholar

Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1993). Marital satisfaction, depression, and attributions: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 442.Google Scholar

Fincham, F. D., Hall, J., & Beach, S. R. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: Current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55(4), 415–427.Google Scholar

Fincham, F. D., Harold, G. T., & Gano-Phillips, S. (2000). The longitudinal association between attributions and marital satisfaction: Direction of effects and role of efficacy expectations. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(2), 267–285.Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 263.Google Scholar

Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & vanDellen, M. R. (2015). Transactive goal dynamics. Psychological Review, 122, 648–673.Google Scholar

Fletcher, G. J. O., & Kerr, P. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 627–658.Google Scholar

Gordon, C. L., Arnette, R. A., & Smith, R. E. (2011). Have you thanked your spouse today? Felt and expressed gratitude among married couples. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(3), 339–343.Google Scholar

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Heyman, R. E. (2001). Observation of couple conflicts: Clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations. Psychological Assessment, 13(1), 5–35.Google Scholar

Jacobson, N. S., Christensen, A., Prince, S. E., Cordova, J., & Eldridge, K. (2000). Integrative behavioral couple therapy: An acceptance-based, promising new treatment for couple discord. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(2), 351.Google Scholar

Joel, S., Gordon, A. M., Impett, E. A., MacDonald, G., & Keltner, D. (2013). The things you do for me: Perceptions of a romantic partner’s investments promote gratitude and commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(10), 1333–1345.Google Scholar

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3.Google Scholar

Karremans, J. C., & Van Lange, P. A. (2004). Back to caring after being hurt: The role of forgiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(2), 207–227.Google Scholar

Katz, J., Arias, I., Beach, S. R., Brody, G., & Roman, P. (1995). Excuses, excuses: Accounting for the effects of partner violence on marital satisfaction and stability. Violence and Victims, 10(4), 315.Google Scholar

Kearns, J. N., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). A prototype analysis of forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 838–855.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In Levine, D. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Volume 15, pp. 192–238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attributions in social interactions. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of independence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lambert, N. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Expressing gratitude to a partner leads to more relationship maintenance behavior. Emotion, 11(1), 52.Google Scholar

Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., McNulty, J. K., & Kumashiro, M. (2010). The doormat effect: When forgiving erodes self-respect and self-concept clarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(5), 734.Google Scholar

Major, B., & Schmader, T. (1998). Coping with stigma through psychological disengagement. In Swim, J. K. & Stangor, C. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 219–241). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

McCullough, M. E., Kimeldorf, M. B., & Cohen, A. D. (2008). An adaptation for altruism: The social causes, social effects, and social evolution of gratitude. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 281–285.Google Scholar

McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., WorthingtonJr, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586.Google Scholar

McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K. (2008). Forgiveness in marriage: Putting the benefits into context. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 171–175.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K. (2010). Forgiveness increases the likelihood of subsequent partner transgressions in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 787–790.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K. (2011). The dark side of forgiveness: The tendency to forgive predicts continued psychological and physical aggression in marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 770–783.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K. (2016). Highlighting the contextual nature of interpersonal relationships. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 54, pp. 247–315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K., & Dugas, A. (2019). A dyadic perspective on gratitude sheds light on both its benefits and its costs: Evidence that low gratitude acts as a “weak link.” Journal of Family Psychology. doi:10.1037/fam0000533.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Beyond positive psychology? Toward a contextual view of psychological processes and well-being. American Psychologist, 67, 101–110.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K., & Karney, B. R. (2001). Attributions in marriage: Integrating specific and global evaluations of a relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 943–955.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K., Olson, M. A., Jones, R. E., & Acosta, L. (2017). Automatic associations between one’s partner and one’s affect as the proximal mechanism of change in relationship satisfaction: Evidence from evaluative conditioning. Psychological Science, 28, 1031–1040.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K., Olson, M. A., Meltzer, A. L., & Shaffer, M. J. (2013). Though they may be unaware, newlyweds implicitly know whether their marriage will be satisfying. Science, 342, 1119–1120.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K., O’Mara, E. M., & Karney, B. R. (2008). Benevolent cognitions as a strategy of relationship maintenance: “Don’t sweat the small stuff” …. But it is not all small stuff. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 631.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 587.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2016). Forgive and forget, or forgive and regret? Whether forgiveness leads to less or more offending depends on offender agreeableness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 616–631.Google Scholar

Murray, S. L., Griffin, D. W., Derrick, J. L., Harris, B., Aloni, M., & Leder, S. (2011). Tempting fate or inviting happiness? Unrealistic idealization prevents the decline of marital satisfaction. Psychological Science, 22, 619–626.Google Scholar

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1155.Google Scholar

Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2009). Stress and reactivity to daily relationship experiences: How stress hinders adaptive processes in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 435–450.Google Scholar

Nowak, M., & Sigmund, K. (1993). A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Nature, 364(6432), 56–58.Google Scholar

O’Mara, E. M., McNulty, J. K., & Karney, B. R. (2011). Positively biased appraisals in everyday life: When do they benefit mental health and when do they harm it? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 415–432.Google Scholar

Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Simpson, J. A. (2006). Regulation processes in intimate relationships: The role of ideal standards. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 662–685.Google Scholar

Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Overall, N. C., & McNulty, J. K. (2017). What type of communication during conflict is beneficial for intimate relationships? Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 1–5.Google Scholar

Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. (2005). Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy, and rumination: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 368–378.Google Scholar

Pape, K. T., & Arias, I. (2000). The role of perceptions and attributions in battered women’s intentions to permanently end their violent relationships. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(2), 201–214.Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In Mashek, D. & Aron, A. (Eds.), The handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Righetti, F., Finkenauer, C., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Low self-control promotes the willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1533–1540.Google Scholar

Robins, R. W., & Beer, J. S. (2001). Positive illusions about the self: Short-term benefits and long-term costs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 340.Google Scholar

Russell, V. M., Baker, L. R., McNulty, J. K., & Overall, N. C. (2018). “You’re forgiven, but don’t do it again!” Direct partner regulation buffers the costs of forgiveness. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(4), 435–444.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 217–242.Google Scholar

Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 379–440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193–210.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57.Google Scholar

Truman-Schram, D. M., Cann, A., Calhoun, L., & Vanwallendael, L. (2000). Leaving an abusive dating relationship: An investment model comparison of women who stay versus women who leave. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 161–183.Google Scholar

Tsang, J. A., McCullough, M. E., & Fincham, F. D. (2006). The longitudinal association between forgiveness and relationship closeness and commitment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(4), 448–472.Google Scholar

Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2010). On angry leaders and agreeable followers: How leaders’ emotions and followers’ personalities shape motivation and team performance. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1827–1834.Google Scholar

Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.Google Scholar

Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., Jobe, R. L., & Lawler, K. A. (2004). Dimensions of forgiveness: The views of laypersons. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(6), 837–855.Google Scholar

Agnew, C. R., Loving, T. J., & Drigotas, S. M. (2001). Substituting the forest for the trees: Social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1042–1057.Google Scholar

Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954.Google Scholar

Agnew, C. R., & VanderDrift, L. E. (2015). Relationship maintenance and dissolution. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Simpson, J. A., & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 581–604). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., McKenna, C., & Heyman, R. E. (2000). Shared participation in self-expanding activities: Positive effects on experienced marital quality. In Noller, P. & Feeney, J. A. (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 177–200). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ballantine, P. W., Lin, Y., & Veer, E. (2015). The influence of user comments on perceptions of Facebook relationship status updates. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 50–55.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573–590.Google Scholar

Baxter, L. A., Dun, T., & Sahistein, E. (2001). Rules for relating communicated among social network members. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 173–199.Google Scholar

Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Billedo, C. J., Kerkhof, P., & Finkenauer, C. (2015). The use of social networking sites for relationship maintenance in long-distance and geographically close romantic relationships. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 152–157.Google Scholar

Blair, K. L., & Holmberg, D. (2008). Perceived social network support and well-being in same-sex versus mixed-sex romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 769–791.Google Scholar

Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961.Google Scholar

Bryant, C. M., Conger, R. D., & Meehan, J. M. (2001). The influence of in‐laws on change in marital success. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 614–626.Google Scholar

Buunk, B. P. (2001). Perceived superiority of one’s own relationship and perceived prevalence of happy and unhappy relationships. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 565–574.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Gonzaga, G. C., Ogburn, E. L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2013). Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 10135–10140.Google Scholar

Canary, D. J. (2011). On babies, bathwater, and absolute claims: Reply to Stafford. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 304–311.Google Scholar

Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communications Monographs, 59, 243–267.Google Scholar

Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.Google Scholar

Castañeda, A. M., Wendel, M. L., & Crockett, E. E. (2015). Overlap in Facebook profiles reflects relationship closeness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155, 395–401.Google Scholar

Cornwell, B. (2012). Spousal network overlap as a basis for spousal support. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 229–238.Google Scholar

Cox, C. L., Wexler, M. O., Rusbult, C. E., & GainesJr, S. O. (1997). Prescriptive support and commitment processes in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 79–90.Google Scholar

Coyne, S. M., McDaniel, B. T., & Stockdale, L. A. (2017). “Do you dare to compare?” Associations between maternal social comparisons on social networking sites and parenting, mental health, and romantic relationship outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 335–340.Google Scholar

Dailey, R. M., Hampel, A. D., & Roberts, J. B. (2010). Relational maintenance in on-again/off-again relationships: An assessment of how relational maintenance, uncertainty, and commitment vary by relationship type and status. Communication Monographs, 77, 75–101.Google Scholar

Dailey, R. M., Pfiester, A., Jin, B., Beck, G., & Clark, G. (2009). On‐again/off‐again dating relationships: How are they different from other dating relationships? Personal Relationships, 16, 23–47.Google Scholar

Dainton, M. (2013). Relationship maintenance on Facebook: Development of a measure, relationship to general maintenance, and relationship satisfaction. College Student Journal, 47, 113–121.Google Scholar

Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2001). A relational uncertainty analysis of jealousy, trust, and maintenance in long‐distance versus geographically close relationships. Communication Quarterly, 49, 172–188.Google Scholar

Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2002). Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns, variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 69, 52–66.Google Scholar

Dainton, M., & Gross, J. (2008). The use of negative behaviors to maintain relationships. Communication Research Reports, 25, 179–191.Google Scholar

Dainton, M., & Stafford, L. (1993). Routine maintenance behaviors: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 255–271.Google Scholar

Dainton, M., & Stafford, L. (2000). Predicting maintenance enactment from relational schemata, spousal behavior, and relational characteristics. Communication Research Reports, 17, 171–180.Google Scholar

Dainton, M., Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1994). Maintenance strategies and physical affection as predictors of love, liking, and satisfaction in marriage. Communication Reports, 7, 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daly, A. (2015). Generation validation: Why everyone just wants to be liked. Elle.com. Retrieved from www.elle.com/life-love/a14618/generation-validation/Google Scholar

Darvell, M. J., Walsh, S. P., & White, K. M. (2011). Facebook tells me so: Applying the theory of planned behavior to understand partner-monitoring behavior on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 717–722.Google Scholar

Dindia, K. (2000). Relational maintenance. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 286–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M.E. (1972). Parental interference and romantic love: The Romeo & Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 1–10.Google Scholar

Drouin, M., Miller, D. A., & Dibble, J. L. (2014). Ignore your partners’ current Facebook friends; beware the ones they add! Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 483–488.Google Scholar

Ellison, N. B., Gray, R., Lampe, C., & Fiore, A. T. (2014a). Social capital and resource requests on Facebook. New Media & Society, 16, 1104–1121.Google Scholar

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.Google Scholar

Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014b). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 855–870.Google Scholar

Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 631–635.Google Scholar

Emery, L. F., Muise, A., Dix, E. L., & Le, B. (2014). Can you tell that I’m in a relationship? Attachment and relationship visibility on Facebook. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1466–1479.Google Scholar

Etcheverry, P., Le, B., & Charania, M. (2008). Perceived versus reported social referent approval and romantic relationship commitment and persistence. Personal Relationships, 15, 281–295.Google Scholar

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). No couple is an island: A social network perspective on dyadic stability. Social Forces, 4, 1259–1287.Google Scholar

Felmlee, D. H., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Close relationships and social psychology: Intersections and future paths. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 365–376.Google Scholar

Fingerman, K., Miller, L., Birditt, K., & Zarit, S. (2009). Giving to the good and the needy: Parental support of grown children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1220–1233.Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–41.Google Scholar

Fox, J., Osborn, J. L., & Warber, K. M. (2014). Relational dialectics and social networking sites: The role of Facebook in romantic relationship escalation, maintenance, conflict, and dissolution. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 527–534.Google Scholar

Fox, J., & Warber, K. M. (2013). Romantic relationship development in the age of Facebook: An exploratory study of emerging adults’ perceptions, motives, and behaviors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 3–7.Google Scholar

Fox, J., & Warber, K. M. (2014). Social networking sites in romantic relationships: Attachment, uncertainty, and partner surveillance on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 3–7.Google Scholar

Fox, J., Warber, K. M., & Makstaller, D. C. (2013). The role of Facebook in romantic relationship development: An exploration of Knapp’s relational stage model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 771–794.Google Scholar

Girme, Y. U., Overall, N. C., & Faingataa, S. (2013). “Date nights” take two: The maintenance function of shared relationship activities. Personal Relationships, 21, 125–149.Google Scholar

Gray, P. B., Franco, C. Y., Garcia, J. R., Gesselman, A. N., & Fisher, H. E. (2016). Romantic and dating behaviors among single parents in the United States. Personal Relationships, 23, 491–504.Google Scholar

Green, J. D., Burnette, J. L., & Davis, J. L. (2008). Third-party forgiveness: (Not) forgiving your close others’ betrayer. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 407–418.Google Scholar

Green, J. D., Davis, J. L., & Reid, C. A. (2014). Third-party forgiveness: Social influences on intimate dyads. In Agnew, C. R. (Ed.), Social influences on romantic relationships: Beyond the dyad (pp. 171–187). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, J. A., & Baym, N. K. (2012). Calling and texting (too much): Mobile maintenance expectations, (over) dependence, entrapment, and friendship satisfaction. New Media & Society, 14, 316–331.Google Scholar

Helms, H. M., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2003). Marital quality and spouses’ marriage work with close friends and each other. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 963–977.Google Scholar

Hogerbrugge, M. J. A., Komter, A. E., & Scheepers, P. (2013). Dissolving long-term romantic relationships: Assessing the role of the social context. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 320–342.Google Scholar

Huston, T. L., & Burgess, R. L. (1979). Social exchange in developing relationships: An overview. In Burgess, R. L. & Huston, T. L. (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 3–28). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, G. L., Kennedy, D., Bradbury, T. N., & Karney, B. R. (2014). A social network comparison of low-income black and white newlywed couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 967–982.Google Scholar

Jensen, J. F., & Rauer, A. J. (2014). Turning inward versus outward: Relationship work in young adults and romantic functioning. Personal Relationships, 21, 451–467.Google Scholar

Jensen, J. F., & Rauer, A. J. (2015). Marriage work in older couples: Disclosure of marital problems to spouses and friends over time. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 732–743.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. P., Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 160–177.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. P., & Leslie, L. (1982). Couple involvement and network structure: A test of the dyadic withdrawal hypothesis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalmijn, M. (2003). Shared friendship networks and the life course: An analysis of survey data on married and cohabiting couples. Social Networks, 25, 231–249.Google Scholar

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Keneski, E., & Loving, T. J. (2014). Network perceptions of daters’ romances. In Agnew, C. R. (Ed.), Social influences on romantic relationships: Beyond the dyad (pp. 126–147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kim, K., Bangerter, L. R., Liu, Y., Polenick, C. A., Zarit, S. H., & Fingerman, K. L. (2017). Middle-aged offspring’s support to aging parents with emerging disability. The Gerontologist, 57, 441–450.Google Scholar

Klein, R. C. A., & Milardo, R. M. (2000). The social context of couple conflict: Support and criticism from informal third parties. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 618–637.Google Scholar

Lane, B. L., & Piercy, C. W. (2017). Making sense of becoming Facebook official: Implications for identity and time. In Punyanunt-Carter, N. & Wrench, J. S. (Eds.), The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships (pp. 31–46). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Lane, B. L., Piercy, C. W., & Carr, C. T. (2016). Making it Facebook official: The warranting value of online relationship status disclosures on relational characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 1–8.Google Scholar

Larson, R., Mannell, R., & Zuzanek, J. (1986). Daily well-being of older adults with friends and family. Psychology and Aging, 1, 117–126.Google Scholar

Ledbetter, A. M. (2010). Assessing the measurement invariance of relational maintenance behavior when face-to-face and online. Communication Research Reports, 27, 30–37.Google Scholar

Lehmiller, J. J., & Agnew, C. R. (2007). Perceived marginalization and the prediction of romantic relationship stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1036–1049.Google Scholar

Lewis, R. (1973). Social reactions and the formation of dyads: An interactionist approach to mate selection. Sociometry, 36, 409–418.Google Scholar

Lydon, J. E., & Quinn, S. K. (2013). Relationship maintenance processes. In Simpson, J. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 573–588). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

MacGeorge, E. L., & Hall, E. D. (2014). Relationship advice. In Agnew, C. R. (Ed.), Social influences on romantic relationships: Beyond the dyad (pp. 188–208). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mansson, D. H. (2016). American grandchildren’s use of relational maintenance behaviors with their grandparents. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 14, 338–352.Google Scholar

Marsiglio, W., & Scanzoni, J. (1995). Families and friendships. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 85–98.Google Scholar

McDaniel, B. T., Coyne, S. M., & Holmes, E. K. (2012). New mothers and media use: Associations between blogging, social networking, and maternal well-being. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16, 1509–1517.Google Scholar

McDaniel, B. T., Drouin, M., & Cravens, J. D. (2017). Do you have anything to hide? Infidelity-related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 88–95.Google Scholar

McDermott, R., Fowler, J., & Christakis, N. (2013). Breaking up is hard to do, unless everyone else is doing it too: Social network effects on divorce in a longitudinal sample. Social Forces, 92, 491–519.Google Scholar

Milardo, R. M. (1982). Friendship networks in developing relationships: Converging and diverging social environments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 162–172.Google Scholar

Milardo, R. M., & Helms-Erikson, H. (2000). Network overlap and third-party influence in close relationships. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 33–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Milardo, R. M., Johnson, M. P., & Huston, T. L. (1983). Developing close relationships: Changing patterns of interaction between pair members and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 964–976.Google Scholar

Monserud, M. A. (2008). Intergenerational relationships and affectual solidarity between grandparents and young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 182–195.Google Scholar

Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 441–444.Google Scholar

Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2014). “Creeping” or just information seeking? Gender differences in partner monitoring in response to jealousy on Facebook. Personal Relationships, 21, 35–50.Google Scholar

Ogolsky, B. G., & Bowers, J. R. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 343–367.Google Scholar

Oliker, S. J. (1989). Best friends and marriage: Exchange among women. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Payne, C. C. (2004). Wives’ domain-specific “marriage work” with friends and spouses: Links to marital quality. Family Relations, 53, 393–404.Google Scholar

Reczek, C., Liu, H., & Umberson, D. (2010). Just the two of us? How parents influence adult children’s marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1205–1219.Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., Caprariello, P. A., & Velickovic, M. (2011). The relationship superiority effect is moderated by the relationship context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 481–484.Google Scholar

Reissman, C., Aron, A., & Bergen, M. R. (1993). Shared activities and marital satisfaction: Causal direction and self-expansion versus boredom. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 243–254.Google Scholar

Rodrigues, D., Lopes, D., Monteiro, L., & Prada, M. (2017). Perceived parent and friend support for romantic relationships in emerging adults. Personal Relationships, 24, 4–16.Google Scholar

Rook, K. S. (2009). Gaps in social support resources in later life: An adaptational challenge in need of further research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 103–112.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77, 523–547.Google Scholar

Rubin, L. B. (1985). Just friends: The role of friendship in our lives. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Agnew, C. R., & Arriaga, X. B. (2012). The Investment model of commitment processes. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology, volume 2 (pp. 218–231). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., & Verette, J. (1994). The investment model: An interdependence analysis of commitment processes and relationship maintenance phenomena. In Canary, D. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 115–139). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Van Lange, P. A., Wildschut, T., Yovetich, N. A., & Verette, J. (2000). Perceived superiority in close relationships: Why it exists and persists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 521–545.Google Scholar

Sarkisian, N., Gerena, M., & Gerstel, N. (2007) Extended family integration among Euro and Mexican Americans: Ethnicity, gender, and class. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 40–54.Google Scholar

Sarkisian, N., & Gerstel, N. (2016). Does singlehood isolate or integrate? Examining the link between marital status and ties to kin, friends, and neighbors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 361–384.Google Scholar

Sassler, S., & Miller, A. J. (2015). The ecology of relationships: Meeting locations and cohabitors’ relationship perceptions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 141–160.Google Scholar

Seal, K. L., Doherty, W. J., & Harris, S. M. (2016). Confiding about problems in marriage and long-term committed relationships: A national study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42, 438–450.Google Scholar

Sinclair, H. C., Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Wright, B. L. (2015). Don’t tell me who I can’t love: A multimethod investigation of social network and reactance effects on romantic relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78, 7–99.Google Scholar

Sinclair, H. C., Hood, K. B., & Wright, B. L. (2014). Revisiting the Romeo and Juliet effect (Driscoll, Davis, & Lipetz, 1972): Reexamining the links between social network opinions and romantic relationship outcomes. Social Psychology, 45, 170–178.Google Scholar

Slatcher, R. B. (2010). When Harry and Sally met Dick and Jane: Creating closeness between couples. Personal Relationships, 17, 279–297.Google Scholar

Smith, A., & Duggan, M. (2013). Online dating & relationships. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/21/online-dating-relationships/Google Scholar

Solomon, D. H., & Knobloch, L. K. (2001). Relationship uncertainty, partner interference, and intimacy within dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 804–820.Google Scholar

Sprecher, S. (2011). The influence of social networks on romantic relationships: Through the lens of the social network. Personal Relationships, 18, 630–644.Google Scholar

Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. H. (1992). The influence of parents and friends on the quality and stability of romantic relationships: A three-wave longitudinal investigation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 888–900.Google Scholar

Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. H. (2000). Romantic partners’ perceptions of social network attributes with the passage of time and relationship transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.Google Scholar

Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D. H., Orbuch, D. L., & Willetts, M. C. (2002). Social networks and change in personal relationships. In Vangelisti, A., Reis, H., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (Eds.), Stability and change in relationships (pp. 257–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stafford, L. (2011). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 278–303.Google Scholar

Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242.Google Scholar

Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communications Monographs, 67, 306–323.Google Scholar

Stein, C. H., Bush, E. G., Ross, R. R., & Ward, M. (1992). Mine, yours and ours: A configural analysis of the networks of married couples in relation to marital satisfaction and individual well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 365–383.Google Scholar

Stewart, M. C., Dainton, M., & Goodboy, A. K. (2014). Maintaining relationships on Facebook: Associations with uncertainty, jealousy, and satisfaction. Communication Reports, 27, 13–26.Google Scholar

Stokes, J. E. (2016). The influence of intergenerational relationships on marital quality following the death of a parent in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 3–22.Google Scholar

Toma, C. L., & Choi, M. (2015). The couple who Facebooks together, stays together: Facebook self-presentation and relationship longevity among college-aged dating couples. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 367–372.Google Scholar

Van Lange, P. A., & Rusbult, C. E. (1995). My relationship is better than – and not as bad as – yours is: The perception of superiority in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 32–44.Google Scholar

Veiel, H. O. F., Crisand, M., Stroszeck-Somschor, H., & Herrie, J. (1991). Social support networks of chronically strained couples: Similarity and overlap. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 279–292.Google Scholar

Vogl-Bauer, S. (2003). Maintaining family relationships. In Canary, D. J. & Dainton, M. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 31–49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Waldinger, R. J., Cohen, S., Schulz, M. S., & Crowell, J. A. (2015). Security of attachment to spouses in late life: Concurrent and prospective links with cognitive and emotional well-being. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 516–529.Google Scholar

Waller, W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Weigel, D. J., & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (1999a). How couples maintain marriages: A closer look at self and spouse influences upon the use of maintenance behaviors in marriages. Family Relations, 48, 263–269.Google Scholar

Weigel, D. J., & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (1999b). Using paired data to test models of relational maintenance and marital quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 175–191.Google Scholar

Widmer, E. D., Kellerhals, J., & Levy, R. (2004) Types of conjugal networks, conjugal conflict and conjugal quality. European Sociological Review, 20, 63–77.Google Scholar

Wildermuth, S. M. (2004). The effects of stigmatizing discourse on the quality of on-line relationships. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 73–84.Google Scholar

Wrzus, C., Hänel, M., Wagner, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2013). Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 53–80.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. (2015). Stress in America [Data file]. Retrieved from www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2015/snapshot.aspxGoogle Scholar

American Psychological Association (2016). Stress in America [Data file]. Retrieved from www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2016/coping-with-change.pdfGoogle Scholar

Badr, H., & Acitelli, L. K. (2017). Re-thinking dyadic coping in the context of chronic illness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 44–48. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.001Google Scholar

Baker, J. P., & Berenbaum, H. (2007). Emotional approach and problem-focused coping: A comparison of potentially adaptive strategies. Cognition and Emotion, 21(1), 95–118. doi:10.1080/02699930600562276Google Scholar

Baker, J. P., & Berenbaum, H. (2011). Dyadic moderators of the effectiveness of problem-focused and emotional-approach coping interventions. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35, 550–559. doi:10.1007/s10608-011-9386-7Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497Google Scholar

Beach, S. R. H., Katz, J., Kim, S., & Brody, G. H. (2003). Prospective effects of marital satisfaction on depressive symptoms in established marriages: A dyadic model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 355–371. doi:10.1177/0265407503020003005Google Scholar

Bodenmann, G. (1995). A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, 34–49.Google Scholar

Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping – a systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140.Google Scholar

Bodenmann, G. (2000). Stress und Coping bei Paaren [Stress and coping in couples]. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar

Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In Revenson, T. A., Kayser, K., & Bodenmann, G. (2005) Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Bodenmann, G., Bradbury, T. N., & Pihet, S. (2009). Relative contributions of treatment-related changes in communication skills and dyadic coping skills to the longitudinal course of marriage in the framework of marital distress prevention. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 50, 1–21. doi:10.1080/10502550802365391Google Scholar

Bodenmann, G., & Cina, A. (2006). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stable-distressed, and separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 44, 71–89. doi:10.1300/J087v44n01_04Google Scholar

Bodenmann, G., Ledermann, T., & Bradbury, T. N. (2007). Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage. Personal Relationships, 14, 551–569.Google Scholar

Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., & Kayser, K. (2011). Two conceptualizations of dyadic coping and their potential for predicting relationship quality and individual well-being: A comparison. European Psychologist, 16(4), 255–266. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000068Google Scholar

Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., & Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485–493. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485Google Scholar

Bodenmann, G., & Shantinath, S. D. (2004). The Couples Coping Enhancement Training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress based upon stress and coping. Family Relations, 53, 477–484.Google Scholar

Coan, J. A., & Sbarra, D. A. (2015). Social baseline theory: The social regulation of risk and effort. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 87–91. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.021Google Scholar

Cutrona, C., Bodenmann, G., Randall, A. K., Clavel, F., & Johnson, M. (in press). Stress, dyadic coping, and social support: Moving toward integration. In Vangelisti, A. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 341–352). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dindia, K. (2000). Relational maintenance. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 287–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Donato, S., Parise, M., Iafrate, R., Bertoni, A., Finkenauer, C., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping responses and partners’ perceptions for couple satisfaction: An actor-partner interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(5), 580–600. doi:10.1177/0265407514541071Google Scholar

Drosdzol, A., & Skrzypulec, V. (2009). Evaluation of marital and sexual interactions of Polish infertile couples. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 3335–3346. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01355.xGoogle Scholar

Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015a). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002Google Scholar

Falconier, M. K., Nussbeck, F., & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Immigration stress and relationship satisfaction in Latino couples: The role of dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 320(8), 813–843. doi:10.1521/jscp.2013.32.8.813Google Scholar

Falconier, M. K., Nussbeck, F., Bodenmann, G., Schneider, H., & Bradbury, T. (2015b). Stress from daily hassles in couples: Its effects on intradyadic stress, relationship satisfaction, and physical and psychological well-being. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41(2), 221–235. doi:10.111/jmft.12073Google Scholar

Falconier, M. K., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (Eds.). (2016). Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Feeney, J. A., & Karantzas, G. C. (2017) Couple conflict: Insights from an attachment perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 60–64. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.017Google Scholar

Fincham, F. D., & May, R. W. (2017). Infidelity in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 70–74. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.008Google Scholar

Folkman, S. (2009). Commentary on the special section “Theory-based approaches to stress and coping”: Questions, answers, issues, and next steps in stress and coping research. European Psychologist, 14(1), 72–77.Google Scholar

Gamarel, K. E., Reisner, S. L., Laurenceau, J. P., Nemoto, T., & Operario, D. (2014). Gender minority stress, mental health, and relationship quality: A dyadic investigation of transgender women and their cisgender male partners. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(4), 437–447. doi:10.1037/a0037171Google Scholar

García-López, C., Sarriá, E., Pozo, P., & Recio, P. (2016). Supportive dyadic coping and psychological adaptation in couples parenting children with autism spectrum disorder: The role of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(11), 3434–3477. doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2883-5Google Scholar

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221–233. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.221Google Scholar

Herzberg, P. Y. (2013). Coping in relationships: The interplay between individual and dyadic coping and their effects on relationship satisfaction. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 26(2), 136–153. doi:10.1080/10615806.2012.655726Google Scholar

Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Sorokowski, P., Atkins, D. C., Sorokowska, A., Ahmadi, K., … Yoo, G. (2016). The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: A 35-nation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, article 1106, 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106Google Scholar

Johnson, M. D., Anderson, J. R., Walker, A., Wilcox, A., Lewis, V. L., & Robbins, D. C. (2013). Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 722–730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034006Google Scholar

Johnson, M. D., Galambos, N. L., Finn, C., Neyer, F. J., & Home, R. M. (2017). Pathways between self-esteem and depression in couples. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 787–799. doi:10.1037/dev0000276Google Scholar

Klaric, M., Franciskovic, T., Stevanovic, A., Petrov, B., Jonovska, S., & Nemcic Moro, I. (2011). Marital quality and relationship satisfaction in war veterans and their wives in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 2, 8077. doi:10.3402/ejpt.v2i0.8077Google Scholar

Landis, M., Peter-Wight, M., Martin, M., & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Dyadic coping and marital satisfaction of older spouses in long-term marriage. GeroPsych, 26(1), 39–47. doi:10.1024/1662–9647/a000077Google Scholar

Lavner, J. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Patterns of change in marital satisfaction over the newlywed years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1171–1187. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00757.xGoogle Scholar

Lavner, J. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (2012). Why do even satisfied newlyweds eventually go on to divorce? Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 1–10. doi:10.1037/a0025966Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Levesque, C., Lafontaine, M., Caron, A., Flesch, J. L., & Bjornson, S. (2014). Dyadic empathy, dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction: A dyadic model. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 118–134. doi:10.5964/ejop.v10i1.697Google Scholar

Merz, C. A., Meuwly, N., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2014). Engaging in dyadic coping: Buffering the impact of everyday stress on prospective relationship satisfaction. Family Science, 5, 30–37. doi:10.1080/19424620.2014.927385Google Scholar

Messerschmitt, S. (2017). Coping with stress association with anticipated stigma: The role of dyadic coping in married, undergraduate students (Unpublished master thesis). Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar

Meuwly, N., Feinstein, B. A., Davila, J., Nuñez, D. G., & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Relationship quality among Swiss women in opposite-sex versus same-sex romantic relationships. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 72, 229–233.Google Scholar

Milek, A., Randall, A. K., Nussbeck, F. W., Breitenstein, C. J., & Bodenmann, G. (2017). Deleterious effects of stress on time spent with one’s partner and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 16, 210–231.Google Scholar

Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2004). How does context affect intimate relationships? Linking external stress and cognitive processes within marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 134–148. doi:10.1177/0146167203255984Google Scholar

Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2017). Acknowledging the elephant in the room: How stressful environmental contexts shape relationship dynamics. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 107–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.013Google Scholar