Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 April 2018
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Relational Theory of World Politics , pp. 357 - 378Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Acharya, Amitav (1998) “Collective Identity and Conflict Management in Southeast Asia”, in: Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (eds.), Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 198–227.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2001) Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2004) “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asia Regionalism”, International Organization 58(2): 239–275.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2009) Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav (2014) “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies”, International Studies Quarterly 58(4): 647–659.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (2007) “Why is There no Non-Western IR Theory: Reflection on and from Asia: An Introduction”, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7(3): 287–312.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav and Johnston, Alastair Iain (2007a) “Comparing Regional Institutions: An Introduction”, in: Acharya, Amitav and Johnston, Alastair Iain (eds.), Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–31.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav and Johnston, Alastair Iain (2007b) “Conclusion: Institutional Features, Cooperation Effects, and the Agenda for Future Research on Comparative Regionalism”, in: Acharya, Amitav and Johnston, Alastair Iain (eds.), Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 244–278.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel (1992) “Europe’s New Security Order: A Pluralistic Security Community”, in: Crawford, Beverly (ed.), The Future of European Security, Berkeley: Center for German and European Studies, University of California, 287–326.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel (2005) Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel (2008) “The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post-Cold War Transformation”, European Journal of International Relations 14(2): 195–230.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel (2010) “Europe as a Civilizational Community of Practice”, in: Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralistic Perspectives, London and New York: Routledge, 67–90.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (eds.) (1998) Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Greve, Patricia (2008) “When Security Community Meets Balance of Power: Overlapping Regional Mechanisms of Security Governance”, Review of International Studies 35(S1): 59–84.Google Scholar
Adler, Paul S. and Known, Seok-Woo (2002) “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept”, Academy of Management Review 27(1): 17–40.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.) (2011) International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Mathias and Lapid, Yosef (1997) “On Dialectic and IR Theory: Hazards of a Proposed Marriage”, Millennium 26(2): 403–415.Google Scholar
Aldrich, Daniel P. (2012) Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Alfred, Michael F. and Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce (1979) “Choosing Sides in Wars”, International Studies Quarterly 23(1): 87–112.Google Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. (1996) Rediscoveries and Reformulations: Humanistic Methodologies for International Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. and Biersteker, Thomas J. (1984) “The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archaeologist of International Savoir Faire”, International Studies Quarterly 28(2): 121–142.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham T. (1977) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Ames, Roger T. and Hall, David L. (2001) Focusing on the Familiar: A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of Zhongyong, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Ames, Roger T. and Hall, David L. (2003) Daodejing – “Making This Life Significant”: A Philosophical Translation, New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Ames, Roger T. and Rosemont, Henry Jr. (1998) The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation, New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard K. (1986) “The Poverty of Neorealism”, in: Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 255–300.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (2002) How to Do Things with Words, Beijing and Cambridge: Foreign Language and Research Press and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan (2010) “Who Governs the Globe?”, in: Avant, Deborah, Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan (eds.), Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 14–17.Google Scholar
Avineri, Shlomo (1972) Hegel’s Theory on the Modern State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert and Keohane, Robert O. (1985) “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions”, World Politics 38(1): 226–254. Also in: Baldwin, David (ed.) (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, 85–115.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, Axelrod, David E., and Pienta, Kenneth J. (2006) “Evolution of Cooperation among Tumor Cells”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(36): 13474–13479.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A. (1971) “Money and Power”, Journal of Politics 33(3): 578–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, David A. (1978) “Power and Social Exchange”, The American Political Science Review 72(4): 1229–1242.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A. (ed.) (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel (2003) “Realist Constructivism”, International Studies Review 5(3): 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond (2005) “Power in International Relations”, International Organization 59(1): 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Finnemore, Martha (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in World Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Berenskoetter, Felix (2007) “Friends, There Are No friends? An Intimate Reframing of the International”, Millennium 35(3): 647–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bian, Yanjie (2011) “Daoyan: Guanxi Shehuixue Jiqi Xueke Diwei (Introduction: Relational Sociology and its Status in the Discipline)”, in: Yanjie, Bian (ed.), Guanxi Shehuixue: Lilun yu Yanjiu (Relational Sociology: Theories and Studies), Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 1–14.Google Scholar
Blaney, David and Inayatullah, Naeem (1998) “International Political Economy as a Cultural of Competition”, in: Jacquin-Berdal, Dominique, Oros, Andrew, and Verweij, Marco (eds.), Culture in World Politics, Houndmills and London: Macmillan, 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaney, David L. and Tickner, Arlene B. (2013) “Introduction: Claiming the International Beyond IR”, in: Tickner, Arlene B. and Blaney, David L. (eds.), Claiming the International, London and New York: Routledge, 1–24.Google Scholar
Bleiker, Roland (1998) “Neorealist Claims in Light of Ancient Chinese Philosophy: the Cultural Dimension of International Theory”, in: Jacquin-Berdal, Dominique, Oros, Andrew, and Verweij, Marco (eds.), Culture in World Politics, Houndmills and London: Macmillan, 89–115.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (2012) “Structure, Habitus, Practices”, in: Calbourn, Craig, Gerteis, Joseph, Moody, James, Pfaff, Steven, and Virk, Indermohan (eds.), Contemporary Sociological Theory, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 345–358.Google Scholar
Brincat, Shannon (2009) “Negativity and Open-Endedness in the Dialectics of World Politics”, Alternatives 34(4): 455–493.Google Scholar
Brincat, Shannon (2011) “Towards a Social-Relational Dialectic for World Politics”, European Journal of International Relations 17(4): 680–709.Google Scholar
Brincat, Shannon and Ling, L. H. M. (2014) “Dialectics for IR: Hegel and the Dao”, Globalizations 11(5): 661–687.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1969) “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach”, in: Knorr, Klaus and Rosenau, James N. (eds.), Contending Approaches to International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 20–38.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley and Waston, Adam (eds.) (1984) The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burchill, Scott (1996) “Introduction”, in: Burchill, Scott and Linklater, Andrew with Devetak, Richard, Paterson, Matthew, and True, Jacqui (eds.), Theories of International Relations, New York: St. Martin’s, 1–27.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structures of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (1993) “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School”, International Organization 47(3): 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2001) “The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR”, Review of International Studies 27(3): 471–488.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2004) From International Society to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry (2010) “Culture and International Society”, International Relations 86(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Little, Richard (2000) International Systems in World History: Rethinking the Study of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Jones, Charles, and Little, Richard (1993) The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole, and de Wilde, Jaap (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael (1999) Custom, Power, and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Callahan, William (2002) “Nationalizing International Theory: The Emergence of the English School and IR Theory with Chinese Characteristics”, Paper Presented at IR Theory in the 21st Century: British and Chinese Perspectives, Beijing: Renmin University of China.Google Scholar
Callahan, William (2004) “The Next Big Idea: Great Harmony and Chinese IR Theory”, International Review 36(Autumn): 33–43.Google Scholar
Caporaso, James A. (1978) “Dependence and Dependency in the Global System: A Structural and Behavioral Analysis”, International Organization 32(1): 13–43.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Faletto, Enzo (1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallet (1964) Twenty Years Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey (1998) “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory”, World Politics 50(2): 324–348.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey (2005) “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework”, International Organization 59(4): 801–826.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey (2007) “Social Mechanisms and Regional Cooperation: Are Europe and the EU Really All that Different?”, in: Acharya, Amitav and Johnston, Alastair Iain (eds.), Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 221–243.Google Scholar
Cheng, Chung-ying (1991) Lun Zhong Xi Zhexue Jingshen (On the Spirits of Chinese and Western Philosophies), Shanghai: Oriental Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Chung-ying (2005) Cong Zhongxi Hushi zhong Tingli: Zhongguo Zhexue yu Zhongguo Wenhua de Xindingwei (Rising from the Mutual Interpretation of Chinese and Western Cultures: Creative Renewal of Chinese Philosophy), Beijing: Renmin University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Chung-ying (2006) “Toward Constructing a Dialectics of Harmonization: Harmony and Conflict in Chinese Philosophy”, Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33(S1): 25–59.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. (1988) “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”, American Journal of Sociology 94(Supplement): S95–S120.Google Scholar
Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (1971), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Confucius, (1998) The Analects, trans. Waley, Arthur, Beijing: Foreign Languages and Research Press.Google Scholar
Confucius, et al. (2014) Chinese Classics: Confucian Analects, The Great Learning, and The Doctrine of the Mean, trans. Legge, James, Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Press.Google Scholar
Cook, K. S. and Whitmeyer, J. M. (1992) “Two Approaches to Social Structure: Exchange Theory and Network Analysis,” Annual Review of Sociology 18: 109–127.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale (2000) “The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism”, International Security 25(2): 187–212.Google Scholar
Coulter, Jeff (1982) “Remarks on the Conceptualization of Social Structure”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12(March): 33–46.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. (1986) “Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory”, in: Keohane, Robert O., Neorealism and its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 204–254.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. (2002) “Universality in International Studies: A Historicist Approach”, in: Brecher, Michael and Harvey, Frank (eds.), Critical Perspectives in International Studies: Millennial Reflections on International Studies, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 209–216.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. (2002) Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Robert M. A. (2001) “International Relations as an Academic Discipline: If It’s Good for America, Is It Good for the World?”, in: Crawford, Robert M. A. and Jarvis, Darryl S. L. (eds.), International Relations Theory: Still an American Social Science? Albany: State University of New York Press, 1–26.Google Scholar
Crawford, Robert M. A., and Jarvis, Darryl S. L. (eds.) (2001) International Relations Theory: Still an American Social Science? Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf (1958) “Out of Utopia: Toward a Reorientation of Sociological Analysis”, American Journal of Sociology 64(2):115–127.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. (1963) The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Di, Bairui (2011) “Women Weishenme Yaodu Lunyu (Why do We Need to Read the Analects)?” Kaifang Shidai (Open Times) 3: 61–68.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack (2000) Realism and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doty, Roxanne Lynn (2000) “Desires All Way Down”, Reviews of International Studies 26(1): 137–139.Google Scholar
Dougherty, James E. and Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. Jr. (2001) Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, 5th edn., New York: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School, New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Duvall, Raymond D. and Chowdhury, Arjun (2011) “Practices of Theory”, in: Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–354.Google Scholar
Dyer, Jeffery H. (1996) “Does Governance Matter: Keiretsu Alliances and Asset Specificity as Sources of Japanese Comparative Advantages”, Organization Science 7(6): 649–666.Google Scholar
Dyer, Jeffery H. and Singh, Harbir (1998) “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage” The Academy of Management Review 23(4): 660–679.Google Scholar
East Asia Vision Group (2001) “Towards an East Asian Community: Region of Peace, Prosperity and Progress”, www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/report2001.pdf, accessed October 26, 2017.Google Scholar
East Asia Vision Group II (2012) “Report of the East Asia Vision Group II”. www.mofa.go.kr/mofat/htm/issue/2012a.pdf, accessed November 6, 2017.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert (1939/2012) On the Process of Civilization: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations, Dublin: University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa (1997) “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology”, American Journal of Sociology 103(2): 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esperne, Eric G. P. (2010) “Contractual and Relational Governance Practices”, Paper for the 95th ISM Annual International Supply Management Conference, April 2010, www.instituteforsupplymanagement.org/files/Pubs/Proceedings/2010ProcGC-Esperne.pdf, accessed October 26, 2017.Google Scholar
Fei, Xiaotong (2012) From the Soil: The Foundation of Chinese Society, Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Feng, Tianyu, Xiaoming, He, and Jiming, Zhou (2005) Zhonghua Wenhuashi (A History of Chinese Culture), Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Youlan(Fung, Yu-lan) Feng (1962) Zhongguo Zhexue Shi (A History of Chinese Philosophy), Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
Youlan(Fung, Yu-lan) Feng (1991) “Why China Has No Science – An Interpretation of the History and Consequences of Chinese Philosophy”, in: Youlan, Feng, Selected Philosophical Writings of Fung Yu-lan, Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 571–595.Google Scholar
Youlan(Fung, Yu-lan) Feng (2004) Feng Youlan Zishu (Autobiography), Beijing: Renmin University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha (1996) National Interests in International Society, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha (2001) “Exporting the English School”, Review of International Studies 27(3): 509–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change”, International Organization 52(4): 887–917.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1991) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of a Prison, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Frank, André Gunder (1967) Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America, New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Frank, André Gunder and Gills, Barry K. (eds.) (1993) The World System: Five Hundred Years of Five Thousand Years, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron L. (1993/1994) “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia”, International Security 18(3): 5–33.Google Scholar
Gao, Cheng (2010) “Quyu Hezuo Moshi Xingcheng de Lishi Genyuan he Zhengzhi Luoji: yi Ouzhou he Meizhou wei Fenxi Yangben (Historical Origins and Political Logics in the Formation of the Patterns of Regional Cooperation: Case Studies on Europe and North America)”, Shijie jingji yu Zhengzhi (World Economics and Politics) 10: 33–57.Google Scholar
Gernet, Jacques (1985) China and the Christian Impact: A Conflict of Cultures, trans. Lioyd, Janet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ge, Zhaoguang (2001) Zhongguo Sixiangshi (A History of Chinese Thinking), Shanghai: Fudan University Press.Google Scholar
Gheciu, Alexander (2005) “Security Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the ‘New Europe’”, International Organization 59(4): 973–1012.Google Scholar
Gill, Stephen (ed.) (1993) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert (1981) War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, Thomas, Guthrie, Doug, and Wank, David (2002) “An Introduction to the Study of Guanxi”, in: Gold, Thomas, Guthrie, Doug, and Wank, David (eds.), Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture, and the Changing Nature of Guanxi, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–20.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. (2001) War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.) (1993) Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. (1988) “Anarchy and the Limits on Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism”, International Organization 42(3): 485–507. Also in: Baldwin, David (ed.) (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, 250–266.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Martin and O”Callaghan, Terry (2001) “The End of International Relations?”, in: Crawford, Robert M. A. and Jarvis, Darryl S. L. (eds.), International Relations Theory: Still an American Social Science? New York: State University of New York Press, 187–202.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Martin and O”Callaghan, Terry (2006) International Relations: The Key Concepts, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Groom, A. J. R. and Mandaville, Peter (2001) “Hegemony and Autonomy in International Relations: The Continental Experience”, in: Crawford, Robert M. A. and Jarvis, Darryl S. L. (eds.), International Relations Theory: Still an American Social Science? New York: State University of New York Press, 151–165.Google Scholar
Gu, Hongming (2006) “Chinese Scholarship: Part II”, in Hongming, Gu ed., Spirit of Chinese People (English-Chinese bilingual edition), Xi”an: Shaanxi Normal University Press, 212–223.Google Scholar
Gulick, Edward Vose (1967) Europe’s Classical Balance of Power: A Case History of the Theory and Practice of One of the Great Concepts of European Statecraft, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Haas, Mark L. (2007) “The United States and the End of the Cold War: Reactions to Shifts in Soviet Power, Policies, or Domestic Politics?”, International Organization 61(1): 145–179.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1984) Theory of Communicative Action Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. McCarthy, Thomas, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Miles Kahler, and Montgomery, Alexander H. (2009) “Network Analysis for International Relations,” International Organization 63(3): 559–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, David L. and Ames, Roger T. (1987) Thinking through Confucius, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hall, David L. and Ames, Roger T. (1995) Anticipating China: Thinking through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Culture, Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hall, David L. and Ames, Roger T. (1998) Thinking from the Han: Self, Truth, and Transcendence in Chinese and Western Culture, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior”, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Harrison, Lawrence E. and Huntington, Samuel P. (eds.) (2000) Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Haugaard, Mark (2012) “Rethinking the Four Dimensions of Power: Domination and Empowerment”, Journal of Political Power 5(1): 33–54.Google Scholar
He, Zhaowu, Jinzi, Bu, Yuyuan, Tang, and Kaitai, Sun (1991) An Intellectual History of China, Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
He, Zhipeng and Lu, Sun (2015) “Zhongguo de Guojifa Guannian: Jiyu Guoji Guanxi Shi de Fenxi (Chinese Views of International Law: An Analysis Based on History of International Relations)”, Guoji Guanxi yu Guojifa Xuekan (Journal of International Relations and International Law), 5: 42–94.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1991) The Philosophy of History, trans. Sibee, J., Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Heine, Christian and Teschke, Benno (1996) “Sleeping Beauty and the Dialectical Awakening: On the Potential of Dialectic for International Relations”, Millennium 25(2): 399–423.Google Scholar
Herz, John (1950) “Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma”, World Politics 2: 157–180.Google Scholar
Ho, D. Y. F. (1991) “Relational Orientation and Methodological Individualism”, Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society 26/27: 81–95.Google Scholar
Ho, D. Y. F. (1995) “Selfhood and Identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrasts with the West”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 25(2): 115–139.Google Scholar
Ho, D. Y. F. (2000) “Dialectical Thinking: Neither Eastern nor Western”, American Psychology, 55(9): 1064–5.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted (1998) “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory”, International Security 23(1): 171–200.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted (2010) “The Logic of Habit in International Relations”, European Journal of International Relations 16(4): 539–561.Google Scholar
Hu, Shi (1919/1991) Hu Shi Xueshu Wenji: Zhongguo Zhexueshi (Collective Works of Hu Shi: A History of Chinese Philosophy), Beijing: Zhonghua Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Chiung-chiu and Shih, Chih-yu (2014) Harmonious Intervention: China’s Quest for Relational Security, Surrey, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hui, Victoria Tin-bor (2005), War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel (1993) “The Clash of Civilizations?”, Foreign Affairs 72(3): 22–49.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (2001) “Keeping History, Law and Political Philosophy Firmly within the English School”, Review of International Studies 27(3): 489–494.Google Scholar
Hwang, Kwang-kuo (1987) “Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game”, American Journal of Sociology 92(4): 944–974.Google Scholar
Hwang, Kwang-kuo (2006) Rujia Guanxizhuyi: Wenhua Fansi yu Dianfan Chongjian (Confucian Relationalism: Cultural Reflection and Theoretical Construction), Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Hwang, Kwang-kuo, Xianjin, Hu et al. (2004) Mianzi: Zhongguoren de Quanli Youxi (Face: Power Game of Chinese People), Beijing: Renmin University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, John (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, John (2008) “The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive?”, Foreign Affairs 87(1): 23–37.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, John (2009a) “Liberalism in a Realist World: International Relations as an American Scholarly Tradition”, International Studies 46(1&2): 203–219.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, John (2009b) “Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order,” Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 71–87.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, John and Slaughter, Ann-Marie (2006), Forging the World of Liberty under Law, US Strategic Security in the 21st Century – Final Report of the Princeton Project on National Security, www.princeton.edu/~ppns/report/FinalReport.pdf, accessed October 26, 2017.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2008) “Foregrounding Ontology: Dualism, Monism, and IR Theory”, Review of International Studies 34(1): 129–153.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H. (1999) “Relations before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics”, European Journal of International Relations 5(3): 291–332.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert (1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain (1995), Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bruce, Pascual, Carlos, and Stedman, Stephen John (2009) Power and Responsibility: Building International Order in an Era of Transnational Threats, Washington: The Brooking Institution Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Candace, Hesterly, William S., and Borgatti, Stephen P. (1997) “A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms”, The Academy of Management Review 22(4): 911–945.Google Scholar
Kagan, Jerome (2009) The Three Cultures: Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, and the Humanities in the 21st Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David (2007) China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997) Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Morton (1969) “The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs Science in International Relations”, in: Knorr, Klaus and Rosenau, James N. (eds.), Contending Approaches to International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 39–61.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.) (1996) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (2005) A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium, Ithaca and London, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (2010a) “A World of Plural and Pluralistic Civilizations: Multiple Actors, Traditions, and Practices”, in: Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralistic Perspectives, London and New York: Routledge, 1–40.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (2010b) “A World of Plural and Pluralistic Civilizations”, World Economics and Politics 11: 45–53.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (2012a) (ed.) Sinicization and the Rise of China: Civilizational Processes beyond East and West, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (2012b) (ed.) Anglo-America and Its Discontents: Civilizational Identities beyond West and East, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D. (eds.) (1999) Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret M. and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward (2007) “A Case Study of the Construction of International Hierarchy: British Treaty-making Against the Slave Trade in the Early Nineteenth Century”, International Organization 61(2): 311–339.Google Scholar
Keeny, Spurgeon M. and Panofsky, Wolfgang K. H. (1981) “MAD versus NUTS: Can Doctrine or Weaponry Remedy the Mutual Hostage Relationship of the Superpowers”, Foreign Affairs 60(2): 287–304.Google Scholar
Kegley, Charles (ed.) (1995) Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and Neoliberal Challenges, New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Kennan, George (1947) “The Sources of the Soviet Conduct”, Foreign Affairs, 25(4): 566–82.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul (1987) The Rise and Fall of Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500–2000, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1989a) (ed.) International Institutions and State Power: Essay in International Relations Theory, Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1989b) “Neoliberal Institutionalism: A Perspective on World Politics”, in: Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), International Institutions and State Power: Essay in International Relations Theory, Boulder: Westview Press, 1–20.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1989c) “Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond”, in: Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), International Institutions and State Power: Essay in International Relations Theory, Boulder: Westview Press, 35–73.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1989d) “The Demand for International Regimes”, in Keohane, Robert O., International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory, Boulder: Westview Press, 101–131.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1989e) “International Institutions: Two Approaches”, in: Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), International Institutions and State Power: Essay in International Relations Theory, Boulder: Westview Press, 158–179.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1993) “Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War”, in: Baldwin, David (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, 269–300.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (2000) “Ideas Part-way Down”, Reviews of International Studies 26(1): 125–130.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (2012) “Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism”, International Relations 26 (2): 125–138.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S. (2000) “Introduction”, in: Nye, Joseph and Donahue, John (eds.), Governance in a Globalizing World, Washington: The Brookings Institution Press, 1–44.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S. (2001) Power and Interdependence, 3rd edn., New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles (1973) The World in Depression, 1929–1939, Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
King, Ambrose Y. (1985) “The Individual and Group in Confucianism: A Relational Perspective”, in: Munro, Donald J. (ed.) Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, the University of Michigan, 57–68.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kipnis, Andrew (2002) “Practices of Guanxi Production and Practices of Ganqing Avoidance”, in: Gold, Thomas, Guthrie, Doug, and Wank, David (eds.), Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture, and the Changing Nature of Guanxi, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–34.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry (1973) A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problems of Peace, 1812–1822, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie (1995) “Norm Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanction against South Africa”, International Organization 49(3): 451–478.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie and Lynch, Cecelia (2007) Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Kornprobst, Markus (2007) “Argumentation and Compromise: Ireland’s Selection of the Territorial Status Quo Norm”, International Organization 61(1): 69–98.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen (ed.) (1983) International Regimes, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen (1991) “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier”, World Politics 43 (3): 336–366. Also in: Baldwin, David (ed.) (1993), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, 234–249.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich (1989) Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich and Mansfield, Edward D. (eds.) (2006) International Organization and Global Governance: A Reader, 2nd edn. (English reprinted edition), Beijing: Pearson Education Asia Limited and Beijing University Press.Google Scholar
Kugler, Jacek and Arbetman, Marina (1989) “Choosing among Measures of Power: A Review of the Empirical Record”, in: Stoll, Richard J. and Ward, Michael D. (eds.), Power in World Politics, Boulder and London: Lynne Reinner, 49–68.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kurth, James (2010) “The United States as a Civilizational Leader”, in Katzenstein, Peter (ed.), Civilization in World Politics: Plural and Pluralistic Perspectives, London and New York: Routledge, 41–66.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1978) The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers I, London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lapid, Yosef (1997) “Culture’s Ship: Returns and Departures in International Relations Theory”, in: Lapid, Yosef and Kratochwil, Friedrich (eds.), The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 3–20.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned (2008) “Identity and International Relations”, International Relations 22(4): 473–492.Google Scholar
Lebra, T. S. (1976) Japanese Patterns of Behavior, Honolulu: The University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey (1997) “Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the ‘Failure’ of Internationalism”, International Organization 51(1): 31–63.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. (1939) Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism, New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Li, John Shuhe (2003) “Relation-based Versus Rule-based Governance: An Explanation of the East Asian Miracle and Asian Crisis”, Review of International Economics 11(4): 651–673.Google Scholar
Li, Minghui (2005), Rujia Shiye xia de Zhengzhi Sixiang (Political Thought within the Confucian Framework), Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Zehou (2011) Zhexue Gangyao (An Outline of Philosophy), Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Liang, Shuming (1933/1992) “Zhongguo Minzu Zijiu Yundong zhi Zuihou Juewu (The Last Consciousness of China’s National Self-salvation Movement)”, in: Minguo Congshu (A Series of Writings during the Period of the Republic of China), Shanghai: Shanghai Shudian.Google Scholar
Liang, Shuming (1949/2012), Zhongguo Wenhua Yaoyi (The Essential Features of Chinese Culture), Shanghai: Shanghai Century Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Nan (1999) “Social Networks and Status Attainment”, Annual Review of Sociology 25: 467–487.Google Scholar
Lin, Nan (2001) “Guanxi: A Conceptual Analysis”, in: So, Alvin Y., Lin, Nan, and Poston, Dudley (eds.), The Chinese Triangle of Mainland, Taiwan, and Hong Kong: Comparative Institutional Analysis, Westport: Greenwood, 153–167Google Scholar
Ling, L. H. M. (2013) “Worlds beyond Westphalia: Daoist Dialectics and the ‘China threat’”, Review of International Studies 39(3): 549–568.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew and Suganami, Hidemi (2006) The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Qing (2015) “Xunqiu Gongjian de Pubianxing: Cong Tianxia Lixiang dao Xin Shijie Zhuyi (In Search for a Jointly Built Universality: From the Tianxia Ideal to New Worldism)”, in: Jilin, Xu and Qing, Liu (eds.), New Worldism, Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 54–63.Google Scholar
Lou, Yulie (2016) “Guoyi: Chuantong Wenhua de Shijianzhe (Chinese Medicine: A Practice of Traditional Chinese Culture”, in: Yulie, Lou, Zhongguo Wenhua de Genben Jingshen (The Essence of the Chinese Culture), Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju, 116–132.Google Scholar
Luo, Hua (2006) “Lun Renmin Tiaojie Zhidu de Xianzhuang, Bianhua jiqi Jiazhi Neihan (The Condition, Change and Inherent Value of People’s Mediation)”, Lilun yu Gaige (Theory and Reform) 6: 121–123.Google Scholar
Luo, Jiade and Jing, Wang (2011) “Quanzi Lilun: Yi Shehui Wangluo de Shijiao Fenxi Zhongguoren de Zuzhi Xingwei (Circle Theory: An Analysis of Chinese Organizational Behavior from the Perspective of Social Networking”, in: Yanjie, Bian (ed.), Guanxi Shehuixue: Lilun yu Yanjiu (Relational Sociology: Theories and Studies), Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 205–223.Google Scholar
Maliniak, Daniel, Peterson, Susan, Powers, Ryan, and Tierney, Michael J. (2014) TRIP 2014 Faculty Survey. Williamsburg: Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations, https://trip.wm.edu/reports/2014/rp_2014/, accessed November 6, 2017.Google Scholar
Mansbach, Richard W. and Vasquez, John A. (1981) In Search of Theory – A New Paradigm for Global Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. (1998) “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders”, International Organization 52(4): 943–969.Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael (1991) “Do Relative Gains Matter?: America’s Response to Japanese Industrial Policy”, International Security, 16 (1): 73–113. Also in: Baldwin, David (ed.) (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, 250–266.Google Scholar
Mencius, (2014) Chinese Classics: The Works of Mencius, trans. Legge, James, Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen (1993) “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory”, in: Baldwin, David A. (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, 143–169.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen (1997) Interest, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Patrick (2011) “The Practice of Deterrence”, in: Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–173.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1961) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 3rd edn., New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Mou, Zongsan (1985), Yuan shan lun (On Realization of Virtue), Taibei: Taiwan Xuesheng Shuju.Google Scholar
Munro, Donald (ed.) (1985) Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Neufeld, Mark A. (1995) The Restructuring of International Relations Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ni, Peimin (2010) “Zhongyi de Kexuexing yu Liangzhong Kexue Gainian (Scientific-ness of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Two Understandings of Science)”, Zhexue Fenxi (Philosophical Analysis) 1(1): 139–146.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Michael (1996) “The Continued Significance of Positivism?”, in: Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 128–145.Google Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E. (2003) The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently … and Why, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, Richard, Peng, Kaiping, Choi, Incheol, and Norenzayan, Ara (2001) “Culture and System of Thought: Holistic Versus Analytical Cognition”, Psychological Review 108(2): 291–310.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. (2005) Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nossal, Kim Richard (2001) “Tales that Textbooks Tell: Ethnocentricity and Diversity in American Introductions to International Relations”, in: Crawford, Robert M. A. and Jarvis, Darryl S. L. (eds.), International Relations – Still an American Social Science: Toward Diversity in International Thought, Albany: State University of New York, 167–186.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin (2006) “Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation”, Science 314 (5805): 1560–1563.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin (2012) “Evolving cooperation”, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299: 1–8.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin, with Highfield, Roger (2011) Super Cooperators: Evolution, Altruism and Human Behaviour or Why We Need Each Other to Succeed, Edinburgh: Canongate.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. (1993) Understanding International Conflict: An Introduction to Theory and History, New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. (2002) The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. (2015) “The Future of U.S.-China Relations”, China-US Focus Digest 6: 16–18.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood (1998) “Constructivism: A User’s Mannual”, in: Kubálková, Vendulka, Onuf, Nicholas, and Kowert, Paul (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World, Armonk and London: M.E. Sharpe, 58–78.Google Scholar
Organski, A. F. K. and Kugler, Jacek (1980), The War Ledger, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ou, Jiecheng (2005), Dang Zhongyi Yushang Xiyi: Lishi yu Xingsi (When Chinese Medicine Meets Western Medicine: History and Ideas), Beijing: Sanlian Press.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A. (ed.) (1986) Cooperation under Anarchy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Paltiel, Jeremy (2010) “Mencius and the World Order Theories”, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3(1): 37–54.Google Scholar
Pang, Pu (1980) “Zhongyong Pingyi (An Analysis of Zhongyong)”, Zhongguo Shehui Kexue (Social Sciences in China) (1): 75–100.Google Scholar
Pang, Pu (1986) “Daojia Bianzhengfa Lungang (An Outline of the Daoist Dialectics) Part I”, Xueshu Yuekan (Academic Monthly) (12): 4–10.Google Scholar
Pang, Pu (1987) “Daojia Bianzhengfa Lungang (An Outline of the Daoist Dialectics) Part II”, Xueshu Yuekan (Academic Monthly) (1): 29–33.Google Scholar
Peng, Kaiping and Nisbett, Richard (1999) “Culture, Dialectics, and Reasoning about Contradiction”, American Psychology 54(9): 741–754.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael (1998) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Poppo, Laura and Zenger, Todd (2002) “Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements?”, Strategic Management Journal 23(8): 707–725.Google Scholar
Porter, Tony (2001) “Can there be National Perspectives on International Theory”, in: Crawford, Robert M. A. and Jarvis, Darryl S. L. (eds.), International Relations Theory: Still an American Social Science?, Albany: State University of New York Press, 131–147.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro (1998) “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology”, Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1–24.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2008) “The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities”, International Organization 62(2): 257–288.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent (2016) International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert (1991) “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory”, American Political Science Review 85(4): 1303–1320. Also in: Baldwin, David (ed.) (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, 209–233.Google Scholar
Prakash, Aseem and Potoski, Mathew (2010) “The International Organization for Standardization as a Global Governor: A Club Theory Perspective”, in: Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K., Who Governs the Globe?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 72–101.Google Scholar
Pye, Lucian (1968) The Spirit of Chinese Politics: A Psychocultural Study of the Authority Crisis in Political Development, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Qian, Mu (1994) Zhongguo Wenhuashi Daolun (An Introduction to the Cultural History of China), Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Qian, Mu(2005) Xiandai Zhongguo Xueshu Lunheng (On Modern Chinese Academic Development), Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2004) “Guoji Guanxi Yanjiu zhong Kexue yu Renwen de Qihe (Combination of Science and Humanities in the Study of International Relations)”, Zhonguo Shehui Kexue (Social Sciences in China) (1): 78–82.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2009a) “Guanxi Benwei yu Guocheng Jiangou: Jiang Zhongguo Linian Zhiru Guoji Guanxi Lilun(Relationality and Processual Construction: Bringing Chinese Ideas into International Relations Theory)”, Zhongguo shehui Kexue (Social Sciences in China) xxx(4): 5–20.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2009b) “Diqu Goujia yu Dongya Hezuo: Duoyuan Duochong de Diqu Zhili Tixi (Regional Architecture and East Asian Cooperation: A Multiple and Plural Framework for Regional Governance)”, in: Yaqing, Qin (ed.) Dongya Diqu Hezuo: 2009 (East Asian Cooperation: 2009), Beijing: Jingji Kexue Chubanshe, 1–14.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2010) “International Society as a Process: Institutions, Identities, and China’s Peaceful Rise”, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3(2): 129–153.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2011) “Possibility and Inevitability of a Chinese School of International Relations Theory”, in: Callahan, William A. and Barabantseva, Elena (eds.), China Orders the World: Normative Soft Power and Foreign Policy, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 37–53.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2013) “Guojia Xingdong de Luoji: Guoji Guanxi Lilun de Zhishi Zhuanxiang jiqi Yiyi (Logics of State Action: The Knowledge Turn and its Implications)”, Zhongguo Shehui Kexue (Social Sciences in China), 6: 182–198.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2014) “Continuity through Change: Background Knowledge and China’s International Strategy”, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7(3): 285–314.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2016a) “A Relational Theory of World Politics”, International Studies Review 18(1): 33–47.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing (2016b) “Zhongguo Canyu Guoji Tixi: Jiyu Shijian de Shijiao (China’s Engagement with the International System: A Perspective of Practice)”, in: Yaqing, Qin (ed.) Shijian yu Biange: Zhongguo Canyu Guoji Tixi Jincheng Yanjiu (Practice and Coevolution: China’s Engagement with the International System), Beijing: World Knowledge Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing and Ling, Wei (2008) “Structure, Process, and the Socialization of Power: East Asian Community Building and the Rise of China”, in: Ross, Robert and Feng, Zhu (eds.), China’s Ascent: Power, Security, and the Future of International Relations, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 115–140.Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan and Stam, Allan C. (2002) Democracies at War, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ringma, Erik (2012) “Performing International Systems: Two East-Asian Alternatives to the Westphalian Order,” International Organization 66(1):1–25.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas (2000) “Let’s Argue!: Communicative Action in World Politics”, International Organization 54(1): 1–39.Google Scholar
Rittberger, Volker (1993) Regime Theory and International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Roberson, B. A. (1998) International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory, London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James (1982) The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, London: Frances Printer.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James (2003) Distant Proximities: Dynamics beyond Globalization, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto (eds.) (1992) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rostow, W. W. (1966) The Stage of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard (ed.) (1993) Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard (1999) “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructive Challenge”, in: Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D. (eds.), Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 215–245.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce (1993) Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce and Oneal, John (2001) Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, Starr, Harvey, and Kinsella, David (2006) World Politics: The Menu for Choice, 8th edn., Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R. (2001) “Introduction: Practice Theory”, in: Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr, and Savigny, Eike Von, (eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London and New York: Routledge, 1–14.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas (1980) The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Benjamin (1964) “Some Polarities in Chinese Thought”, in: Wright, Arthur, ed., Confucianism and Chinese Civilization, New York: Atheneum Press, 3–15.Google Scholar
Shang, Huipeng (2015) “Lun Gudai Nanya Guoji Tixi: ‘Dafa Tixi’ de Tedian ji Yuanli (The International System in Ancient South Asia: The Logic of the Dharma System)”, Guoji Zhengzhi Yanjiu (The Journal of International Studies) 141(5): 9–27.Google Scholar
Shannon, Thomas Richard (1989) An Introduction to the World-System Perspective, Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Shih, Chi-yu and Huang, Chiung-chiu (2015) “China’s Quest for Grand Strategy: Power, National Interest, or Relational Security”, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 8(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Shweder, Richard A. (2000) “Moral Maps, ‘First World’ Conceits, and the New Evangelist”, in: Harrison, Lawrence E. and Huntington, Samuel P. (eds.), Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, New York: Basic Books, 159–176.Google Scholar
Shweder, Richard A. and LeVine, Robert A. (eds.) (1984), Cultural Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sil, Rudra and Katzenstein, Peter (2010) Beyond Paradigms: An Analytical Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics, London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. (1955) “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1): 99–118.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. (1985) “Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science”, American Political Science Review 79 (2): 293–304.Google Scholar
Simon, Burton, Fletcher, Jeffery A., and Doebeli, Michael (2012) “Hamilton’s Rule in Multi-level Selection Models”, Journal of Theoretical Biology 299: 55–63.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David (1961) “The Level-of-Analysis Problems in International Relations”, in: Knorr, Klaus and Verba, Sidney (eds.), The International Studies: Theoretical Essays, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 77–92.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anna-Marie (2009) “America’s Edge: Power in the Networked Century”, Foreign Affairs 88(1): 94–113Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anna-Marie, Jentleson, Bruce W., Daalder, Ivo H., etc. (2008) Strategic Leadership: Framework for a 21st Century National Security Strategy, http://fsi.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/StrategicLeadership.pdf, accessed October 26, 2017.Google Scholar
Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.) (1996) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Song, Zhiming (1998) “Zhongguo Gudai Bianzhengfa de Leixing yu Hexin (Types and Core Ideas of the Dialectics in Ancient China)”, Journal of Renmin University 12(5): 39–44.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur (1982) “Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World”, International Organization 36(2): 299–324. Also in: Baldwin, David (ed.) (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, 29–59.Google Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer (2002) “Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Reconstructing, or Rereading”, International Studies Review 4(1): 73–97.Google Scholar
Stern, Geoffrey (1995) The Structure of International Society, London and Washington: Pinter.Google Scholar
Sun, Zhongyuan (2014) Zhongguo Luojixue Shijiang (Ten Lectures on Chinese Logic), Beijing: Renmin University Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine (1994) Feminist Theory and International Relations Theory in a Postmodern Era, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Szabó, György and Szolnoki, Attila (2012) “Selfishness, Fraternity, and Other-regarding Preference in Spatial Evolutionary Games”, Journal of Theoretical Biology 299: 81–87.Google Scholar
Tao, Shuya (1999) “Lun Renmin Xietiao Zhidu (On People’s Mediation System)”, Xiandai Faxue (Modern Law Science) 20(3): 66–68.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann (2011) “Dealing with Difference: Problems and Possibilities for Dialogue in International Relations”, Millennium 39 (3): 607–618.Google Scholar
Tickner, Arlene B. and Blaney, David L. (eds.) (2012) Thinking International Relations Differently, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tickner, Arlene B. and Blaney, David L. (2013) Claiming the International, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tickner, Arlene B. and Wæver, Ole (eds.) (2009) International Relations Scholarship around the World, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1996) “International Communities, Secure or Otherwise”, Center for the Social Sciences at Columbia University Pre-Print Series.Google Scholar
Tu, Wei-Ming (1985) “Selfhood and Otherness: The Father-Son Relationship in Confucian Thought”, in: Wei-Ming, Tu, Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 113–130.Google Scholar
Tu, Wei-Ming (2008) An Insight of Chung-yung (the Chinese and English bilingual edition), Beijing: People’s Press.Google Scholar
Tylor, Edward B. (1871), Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Uzzi, Brian (1997) “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness”, Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1): 35–67.Google Scholar
Veelen, Matthijs van, García, Julián, Sabelis, Maurice W., and Egas, Martijn (2012) “Group Selection and Inclusive Fitness are not Equivalent; The Price Equation vs. Models and Statistics”, Journal of Theoretical Biology 299: 64–80.Google Scholar
Vincent, R. J. (1986) Foreign Policy and Human Rights in International Relations: Issues and Responses, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wæver, Ole (1996) “The Rise and Fall of the Inter-paradigm Debate”, in: Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–185.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth (1995) “Realist Thought and Neo-realist Theory”, in: Kegley, Charles (ed.), Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and Neoliberal Challenges, New York: St. Martin’s, 67–82.Google Scholar
Wang, Yangming (2014) Chuanxi Lu (Wang Yangming’s Teachings), Beijing: Beijing Shidai Huawen Shuju.Google Scholar
Ward, Mchael D., Stovel, Katherine, and Sacks, Audrey (2011) “Network Analysis and Political Science”, Annual Review of Political Science 14: 245–264.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam (1992) The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1949) The Methodology of the Social Sciences, trans. and edited by Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A., Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1999) “Die ‘Objektivität’ Sozialwissenschaftlicher und Sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis”, in: Flitner, Elizabeth (ed.), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Potsdam: Internet-Ausgabe.Google Scholar
Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language (1986), Springfield: Merriam-Webster Inc.Google Scholar
Wei, Ling (2010) Guifan, Wangluohua yu Diquzhuyi: Dier Guidao Jincheng Yanjiu (Norms, Networking, and Regionalism: A Study of Track Two Processes), Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Weldes, Jutta (1996) “Constructing National Interests”, European Journal of International Relations 2(3): 273–318.Google Scholar
Wellman, Barry, Chen, Wenhong, and Weizhen, Dong (2002) “Networking Guanxi,” in: Gold, Thomas, Guthrie, Doug, and Wank, David (eds.), Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture, and the Changing Nature of Guanxi, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 221–241.Google Scholar
Wemheuer-Vogelaar, Wiebke, Bell, Nicholas J., Morales, Mariana Navarrete, and Tierney, Michael J., (2016) “The IR of the Beholder: Examining Global IR Using the 2014 TRIP Survey”, International Studies Review 18: 16–32.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1987) “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory”, International Organization 41(3): 335–370.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1992) “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics”, International Organization 46(2): 391–425.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1994) “Collective Identity Formation and the International State”, American Political Science Review 88(2): 384–396.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1999) Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (2001) “Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design”, International Organization 55(4): 1019–1049.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North (2010) Process and Reality, corrected edn., edited by Griffin, David Ray and Sherburne, Donald W., 2nd edn., New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Womack, Brantly (2006) China and Vietnam: The Politics of Asymmetry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Womack, Brantly (2016) Asymmetry and International Relationships, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Jingrong and Zhenqiu, Cheng (eds.) (2000) New-Age Chinese-English Dictionary, Beijing: Commerce Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Jin (2009) “Mengzi de Guojiajian Zhengzhi Sixiang ji Qishi (The International Thought of Mencius and its Implications)”, Shijie Jingji yu Zhengzhi (World Economics and Politics) 1: 6–16.Google Scholar
Xu, Shen (2006) Shuowen Jiezi (Xu Shen’s Etymological Dictionary), Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Zhuoyun (2006) Zhongguo Wenhua yu Shijie Wenhua (Chinese Culture and Cultures of the World), Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press.Google Scholar
Xunzi, (1999) Xunzi (I), trans. Knoblock, John, Changsha: Hunan People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Yan, Xuetong (2011) Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power, trans. Ryden, Edmund, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Kuo-shu (1993) Zhongguoren de Shehui Quxiang – Shehui Hudong de Guandian (Social Orientation of the Chinese: A Social Interaction Perspective) Taipei: Guiguan Press.Google Scholar
Zaheer, Akbar, McEvily, Bill, and Perrone, Vincenzo (1998) “Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance”, Organization Science 9(2): 141–159.Google Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia (1996) “‘All These Theories yet the Bodies Keeping Piling Up’: Theory, Theorists, Theorizing”, in: Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 346–351.Google Scholar
Zehfuss, Maja (2002) Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhai, Xuewei (2005) Renqing, Mianzi, and Quanli de Zai Shengchan (Renqing, Face, and Reproduction of Power), Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Zhai, Xuewei (2011) Zhongguoren de Guanxi Yuanli: Shikong Zhixu, Shenghuo Yunian Jiqi Liubian (The Principle of Chinese Guanxi: Time-space Order, Life Desire, and their Changes), Beijing, Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Shuguang (2009) Jiechu Waijiao: Nikesong Zhengfu yu Jiedong Zhongmei Guanxin (Diplomacy of Engagement: Nixon Administration and Relaxation in Sino-US Relations), Beijing: World Knowledge Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, Tingyang (2009) “Gongzai Cunzai Lun: Renji yu Xinji (Ontology of Coexistence: Relations and Hearts)”, Zhexue Yanjiu (Philosophical Researches) 8: 22–30.Google Scholar
Zhao, Tingyang (2010) “Hezuo de Tiaojian (Conditions for Cooperation)”, in: Tingyang, Zhao, Meigeren de Zhengzhi (Politics of Everybody), Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 18–49.Google Scholar
Zhao, Tingyang (2016) Tianxia de Dangdaixing: Shijie Zhixu de Shijian yu Xiangxiang (A Possible World of All-under-heaven System: The World Order in the Past and for the Future), Beijing: China Citic Press.Google Scholar
Zhou, Kevin Zheng, Poppo, Laura, and Yang, Zhilin (2008) “Relational Ties or Customized Contracts? An Examination of Alternative Governance Choices in China”, Journal of International Business Studies 39(3): 526–534.Google Scholar
Zhu, Zhirong (2005) Zhongguo Shenmei Lilun (A Theory of Chinese Aesthetics), Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Zhuangzi, (2012) Zhuangzi (Chuang-Tze): A New Selected Translation with an Exposition of the Philosophy of Kuo Hsiang, trans. Youlan, Feng, Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar