Abbott, K, et al., ‘Orchestration: Global Governance through Intermediaries’, in: Abbott, K. et al. (eds), International Organizations as Orchestrators (Cambridge University Press, 2015) 3–36.Google Scholar

Abbott, K W, ‘Public Private Partnerships’, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2008), available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL.Google Scholar

Abbott, K W, & Snidal, D, ‘Hard and Soft Law in International Governance’, 54 International Organization (2000) 421–456.Google Scholar

Abbott, K W, & Snidal, D, ‘Strengthening International Regulation through Transnational New Governance: Overcoming the Orchestration Deficit’, 42 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2009) 501–578.Google Scholar

Abbott, K W, & Snidal, D, ‘The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State’, in: Mattli, W & Woods, N (eds), The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton University Press, 2009) 44–88.Google Scholar

Abegg, A, Die Evolution des Verwaltungsvertrags zwischen Staatsverwaltung und Privaten – Der Kontrahierende Staat in Deutschland, Frankreich und der Schweiz seit dem 18. Jahrhundert (Stämpfli Verlag, 2010).Google Scholar

Alter, K J, & Meunier, S, ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity’, 7 Perspectives on Politics (2009) 13–24.Google Scholar

Arendt, H, Between Past and Future (Penguin Books, 1977).Google Scholar

Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (translated by Bartlett, R C & Collins, S D, University of Chicago Press, 2011) Book V.Google Scholar

Avant, D D, Finnemore, M, & Sell, S K, ‘Who Governs the Globe?’ in: Avant, D D, Finnemore, M & Sell, S K (eds), Who Governs the Globe? (Cambridge University Press, 2010) 1–31.Google Scholar

Ayres, I, & Braithwaite, J, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Azis, D, ‘Global Public-Private Partnerships in International Law’ 2 Asian Journal of International Law (2012) 339–374.Google Scholar

Backer, L C, ‘The Structural Characteristics of Global Law for the 21st Century, Fracture, Fluidity, Permeability, and Polycentricity’, 17 Tilburg Law Review (2012) 177–199.Google Scholar

Bacon, F, Meditationes Sacræ, De Hæresibus (1597).Google Scholar

Baldwin, R, & Black, J, ‘Really Responsive Regulation’, LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 15/2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, R, Cave, M, & Lodge, M, ‘Introduction: Regulation – The Field and the Developing Agenda’, in: Baldwin, R, Cave, M & Lodge, M (eds), Oxford Handbook of Regulation (Oxford University Press, 2010) 3–16.Google Scholar

Barnett, M, & Duvall, R, ‘Power in Global Governance’, in: Barnett, M & Duval, R (eds), Power in Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2005) 1–32.Google Scholar

Bartley, T, ‘Transnational Governance as the Layering of Rules: Intersections of Public and Private Standards’ 12 Theoretical Inquiries in Law (2011), 517–542.Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E, ‘Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders’, 107 AJIL (2013) 295–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benvenisti, E, & Downs, G W, ‘The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law’, 60 Stanford Law Review (2007) 595–632.Google Scholar

Besson, S, ‘Sovereignty’, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2011), available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL.Google Scholar

Black, J, ‘New Institutionalism and Naturalism in Socio-Legal Analysis: Institutionalist Approaches to Regulatory Decision Making’, 19 Law & Policy (1997) 51–93.Google Scholar

Black, J, ‘Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a “Post-Regulatory” World’, 54 Current Legal Problems (2001) 103–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, J, ‘Mapping the Contours of Contemporary Financial Services Regulation’ 2 Journal of Corporate Law Studies (2002) 253–287.Google Scholar

Black, J, ‘Enrolling Actors in Regulatory Systems: Examples from UK Financial Services Regulation’, Public Law (2003) 63–91.Google Scholar

Black, J, ‘Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes’, 2 Regulation & Governance (2008) 137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, J, ‘‘Says Who?’ Liquid Authority and Interpretive Control in Transnational Regulatory Regimes’, 9 International Theory (2017) 286–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodansky, D, ‘The Legitimacy of International Governance’, 93 AJIL (1999) 596–624.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J, Regulatory Capitalism: How It Works, Ideas for Making It Work Better (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J, & Drahos, P, Global Business Regulation (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Bratman, M E, ‘Shared Cooperative Activity’ 101 The Philosophical Review (1992) 327–341.Google Scholar

Buchanan, A, & Keohane, R O, ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, 20 Ethics and International Affairs (2006) 405–437.Google Scholar

Buchanan, A, & Keohane, R O, ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’ in: Buchanan, A (ed), Human Rights, Legitimacy, and the Use of Force (Oxford University Press, 2010) 105–133.Google Scholar

Büthe, T, & Mattli, W, The New Global Rulers – The Privatisation of Regulation in the World Economy (Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Cafaggi, F, ‘New Foundations of Transnational Private Regulation’, 38 Journal of Law and Society (2011) 20–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cafaggi, F, A Comparative Analysis of Transnational Private Regulation: Legitimacy, Quality, Effectiveness and Enforcement, draft version, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/discussions/HIIL%20Comparative%20Report_final%20june.pdf.Google Scholar

Calliess, G-P, & Zumbansen, P, Rough Consensus and Running Code – A Theory of Transnational Private Law (Hart, 2010).Google Scholar

Cantelon, H, & Letters, M, ‘The Making of the IOC Environmental Policy as the Third Dimension of the Olympic Movement’, 35 International Review for the Sociology of Sport (2000) 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castkaa, P, & Balzarovab, M A, ‘The Impact of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 on Standardisation of Social Responsibility – An Inside Perspective’, 113 International Journal of Production Economics (2008) 74–87.Google Scholar

Chappelet, J-L, & Kübler-Mabbott, B, The International Olympic Committee and the Olympic System (Routledge, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christiano, T, ‘Authority’ in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (revised version, 2012), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/authority/.Google Scholar

Coase, R, The Nature of the Firm, 4 Economica (1937) 386–405.Google Scholar

Collins, H, ‘Introduction to Networks as Connected Contracts’, in: Teubner, G (ed), Networks as Connected Contracts (Oxford University Press, 2011) 1–72.Google Scholar

Crawford, J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th ed, Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Cutler, C, Private Authority and Global Authority Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Cutler, C, Haufler, V, & Porter, T (eds), Private Authority and International Affairs (State University of New York Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Dansero, E, et al., ‘Olympic Games, Conflicts and Social Movements: The Case of Torino 2006’, in: Hayes, G & Karamichas, J, Olympic Games, Mega-Events and Civil Societies (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012) 195–218.Google Scholar

de Búrca, G, Keohane, R O, & Sabel, C, ‘Global Experimentalist Governance’, 44 British Journal of Political Science (2014) 477–486.Google Scholar

de Coubertin, P, Philimon, T J, Politis, N G, & Anninos, C, Die Olympischen Spiele, 776 v. Chr. – 1896 n. Chr., Zweiter Theil, Die Olympischen Spiele im Jahre 1896 (Verlag von Carl Beck, 1897).Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, B, ‘The Process of Globalisation’, Eurozine (22 August 2002), available at: www.eurozine.com/articles/2002-08-22-santos-en.html.Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, B, Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition (Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar

de Wet, E, ‘The International Constitutional Order’ 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2006) 51–76.Google Scholar

de Wet, E, ‘The Constitutionalisation of Public International Law’, in Rosenfeld, M & Sajo, A (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2012) 1209–1230.Google Scholar

Deakin, S, ‘The Return of the Guild? Network Relations in Historical Perspective’, in Amstutz, M & Teubner, G, Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Co-Operation (Hart Publishing, 2009) 53–74.Google Scholar

Diller, J M, ‘Private Standardization in Public International Lawmaking’, 33 Michigan Journal of International Law (2012) 481–535.Google Scholar

Domingo, R, The New Global Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupuy, P-M, ‘L’Unité de l’Ordre Juridique International’ 297 Recueil des Cours (Brill 2002).Google Scholar

Duval, A, The Environmental Legacy of Sochi: Time to Take the Olympic Charter Seriously!, available at: www.asser.nl/eel/dossiers/sochi-environmental-legacy/.Google Scholar

Eberlein, B, et al., ‘Transnational Business Governance Interactions: Conceptualization and Framework for Analysis’, 8 Regulation & Governance (2014) 1–21.Google Scholar

Estlund, D, Democratic Authority (Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Falk, R, & Strauss, A, ‘On the Creation of a Global People’s Assembly: Legitimacy and the Power of Popular Sovereignty’, 36 Stanford Journal of International Law (2000) 191–219.Google Scholar

Fassbender, B, ‘The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community’ 36 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (1998) 529–619.Google Scholar

Finnis, J M, Natural Law and Natural Rights (2nd ed, Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A, & Teubner, G, ‘Regime Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, 25 Michigan Journal of International Law (2004) 999–1046.Google Scholar

Foucault, M, Discipline and Punish – The Birth of the Prison (Penguin Books, 1977).Google Scholar

Foucault, M, ‘Prison Talk’, in: Gordon, C (ed), Power/Knowledge – Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972–1977 (Pantheon Books, 1980) 52.Google Scholar

Foucault, M, ‘Truth and Power’ in: Gordon, C (ed), Power/Knowledge – Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972–1977 (Pantheon Books, 1980) 109–133.Google Scholar

Franck, T M, ‘The Power of Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Power: International Law in an Age of Power Disequilibrium’, 100 AJIL (2006) 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankenberg, G, ‘Constitutions in Transfer – Territoriality and Extra-Territoriality’, in: Handl, G, Zekoll, J & Zumbansen, P (eds), Beyond Territoriality – Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012) 261–294.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F, The End of History and the Last Man (The Free Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Gehring, T, & Oberthür, S, ‘The Causal Mechanisms of Interaction between International Institutions’, 15 EJIR (2009) 125–156.Google Scholar

Gill, S, ‘Globalization, Democratization, and the Politics of Indifference’, in: Mittelman, J H (ed), Globalization and Critical Reflections (Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1996) 205–228.Google Scholar

Gilson, R J, Sabel, C F, & Scott, R E, ‘Contracting for Innovation: Vertical Disintegration and Interfirm Collaboration’, 109 Columbia Law Review (2009) 431–502.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J L, & Posner, E A, ‘A Theory of Customary International Law’, 66 University of Chicago Law Review (1999) 1113–1136.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J L, & Posner, E A, The Limits of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grabosky, P, ‘Using Non-Governmental Resources to Foster Regulatory Compliance’, 8 Governance (1995) 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gratton, C, Shibli, S., & Coleman, R., ‘The Economic Impact of Major Sports Events: A Review of Ten Events in the UK’, in: Horne, J. & Manzenreiter, W. (eds), Sports Mega-Events – Social Scientific Analyses of a Global Phenomenon (Wiley-Blackwell, 2006) 41–58.Google Scholar

Grimm, D, Die Zukunft der Verfassung (Suhrkamp, 1994).Google Scholar

Grimm, D, ‘The Achievement of Constitutionalism and Its Prospects in a Changed World’, in: Dobner, P & Loughlin, M (eds), The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (Oxford University Press, 2010) 3–22.Google Scholar

Gross, L, ‘The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948’, 42 AJIL (1948) 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grote, R, ‘Westphalian System’, in: Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2006), available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/epil (last accessed 19 January 2018).Google Scholar

Guttmann, A, ‘The Cold War and the Olympics’, 43 International Journal (1988) 554–568.Google Scholar

Habermas, J, The Postnational Constellation (MIT Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Hall, R B, & Biersteker, T J, ‘The Emergence of Private Authority in the International System’, in Hall, R B & Biersteker, T J (eds), The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2002) 3–22.Google Scholar

Hall, R B, & Biersteker, T J, The Emergence of Private Authority (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Hancher, L, & Moran, M (eds), Capitalism, Culture and Economic Regulation (Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Hancher, L, & Moran, M, ‘Organising Regulatory Space’, in: Hancher, L and Moran, M (eds), Capitalism, Culture and Economic Regulation (Oxford University Press, 1989) 271–299.Google Scholar

Harvey, D, The Conditions of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar

Hayes, G, & Karamichas, J, ‘Introduction: Sport Mega-Events, Sustainable Development and Civil Societies’, in: Hayes, G & Karamichas, J, Olympic Games, Mega-Events and Civil Societies (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012) 1–27.Google Scholar

Heires, M, ‘The International Organization for Standardization (ISO)’ 13 New Political Economy (2008) 357–367.Google Scholar

Henriques, A, ‘What Are Standards For? The Case of ISO 26000’, The Guardian (5 January 2012).Google Scholar

Hirst, P, & Thomson, G, ‘Globalization and the Future of the Nation State’, 24 Economy and Society (1995) 408–442.Google Scholar

Hood, C, ‘The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme’ 20 Accounting, Organizations and Society (1995) 93–109.Google Scholar

Huntington, S. ‘The Clash of Civilization’, 72 (3) Foreign Affairs (1993) 22–49.Google Scholar

Hurd, I, ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’, 53 International Organization (1999) 379–408.Google Scholar

Ivanova, M ‘UNEP as Anchor Organization for the Global Environment’, in: Biermann, F, Siebenhüner, B & Schreyögg, A (eds), International Organizations in Global Environmental Governance (Routledge, 2009) 151–173.Google Scholar

Jansen, N, The Making of Legal Authority – Non-Legislative Codifications in Historical and Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Jessup, P C, Transnational Law (Yale University Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Joerges, C, Kjaer, P F, & Ralli, T, ‘A New Type of Conflicts Law as Constitutional Form in the Postnational Constellation’, 2 Transnational Legal Theory (2011) 153–165.Google Scholar

Jordana, J, ‘Globalizing Regulatory Capitalism’ 598 The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2005) 184–190.Google Scholar

Kaiser, A J, Here are the 4 Challenges Rio de Janeiro Must Meet to Host a Successful 2016 Olympics, Time (2 April 2015), available at: http://time.com/3768709/rio-de-janeiro-2016-olympics/.Google Scholar

Kelly, P F, ‘The Geographies and Politics of Globalization’, 23 Progress in Human Geography (1999) 379–400.Google Scholar

Khan, R, ‘Global Compact’ in: Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2011), available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/epil.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B, ‘The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law’, 20 EJIL (2009) 23–57.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, B, Krisch, N, & Stewart, R B, ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, 68 Law and Contemporary Problems (2005) 15–62.Google Scholar

Kjaer, P F, Post-Hegelian Networks – Comments on the Chapter by Simon Deakin, in: Amstutz, M & Teubner, G (eds), Networks, Legal Issues of Multilateral Cooperation (Hart Publishing, 2009) 75–85.Google Scholar

Kjaer, P F, Constitutionalism in the Global Realm – A Sociological Approach (Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Koslowski, P, Principles of Ethical Economy (Springer, 2001).Google Scholar

Krasner, S D, ‘Globalization, Power, and Authority’, in: Mansfield, E D & Sisson, R (eds), The Evolution of Political Knowledge, Democracy, Autonomy, and Conflict in Comparative and International Politics (Ohio State University, 2004) 60–81.Google Scholar

Kress, C, ‘International Criminal Law’, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009), available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL.Google Scholar

Krisch, N, Beyond Constitutionalism The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krisch, N, ‘The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods’, 108 AJIL (2014) 1–40.Google Scholar

Krisch, N, ‘Liquid Authority in Global Governance’, 9 International Theory (2017) 237–260.Google Scholar

Krisch, N, & Kingsbury, B, ‘Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order’, 17 EJIL (2006) 1–13.Google Scholar

Kumm, M, ‘The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis’, 15 EJIL (2004) 907–931.Google Scholar

Kumm, M, ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State’, in: Dunoff, J L & Trachtman, J P (eds), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2009) 258–260.Google Scholar

Kumm, M, The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: An Integrated Conception of Public Law, 20 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (2013) 605–628.Google Scholar

Ladeur, K-H, ‘Globalization and the Conversion of Democracy to Polycentric Networks: Can Democracy Survive the End of the Nation State?’ in: Ladeur, K-H (ed), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization (Ashgate, 2004) 89–118.Google Scholar

Ladeur, K-H, ‘Theory of Governance’, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2010) available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, E (ed), Hersch Lauterpacht – International Law – Collected Papers, 2. The Law of Peace, Part I International Law in General (Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Levi-Faur, D, ‘The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism’ 598 The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2005) 12–32.Google Scholar

Lincoln, B, Authority: Construction and Corrosion (University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Loughlin, M, ‘What Is Constitutionalisation?’, in: Dobner, P & Loughlin, M, The Twilight of Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2010) 47–69.Google Scholar

Loya, T A, & Boli, J, ‘Standardization in the World Polity: Technical Rationality Over Power’, in: Boli, J & Thomas, G (eds), Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875 (Stanford University Press, 1999) 169–197.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N ‘Verfassung als Evolutionäre Errungenschaft’, 9 Rechtshistorisches Journal (1990) 176–220.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N, The Differentiation of Society (Columbia University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N, Soziologische Aufklärung Vol. 2, Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft (3rd edn., VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1986).Google Scholar

Luhmann, N, Law as a Social System (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Mann, M, The Sources of Social Power (Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Mann, M, ‘Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State?’ 4 Review of International Political Economy (1997) 472–496.Google Scholar

Marmor, A, ‘An Institutional Conception of Authority’, 39 Philosophy & Public Affairs (2011) 238–261.Google Scholar

Mattli, W, & Woods, N, ‘In Whose Benefit? Explaining Regulatory Change in Global Politics’, in: Mattli, W & Woods, N (eds) The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton University Press, 2009) 1–43.Google Scholar

Mégret, F, ‘Globalization’, in: Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009) available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/epil.Google Scholar

Meidinger, E, ‘Regulatory Culture: A Theoretical Outline’, 9 Law & Policy (1987) 355–386.Google Scholar

Meidinger, E, ‘The Administrative Law of Global Private-Public Regulation: The Case of Forestry, 17 EJIL (2006) 47–87.Google Scholar

Meidinger, E, ‘Multi-Interest Self-Governance through Global Product Certification Programmes’, in: Dilling, O, Herberg, M & Winter, G (eds), Responsible Business Self-Governance and Law in Transnational Economic Transactions (Hart, 2008) 259–292.Google Scholar

Meyer, J W, & Rowan, B ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as a Myth and Ceremony’, 77 American Journal of Sociology (1977) 340–363.Google Scholar

Micklitz, H-W, ‘Rethinking the Public/Private Divide’, in: Maduro, M, Tuori, K & Sankari, S (eds), Transnational Law – Rethinking European Law and Legal Thinking (Cambridge University Press, 2014) 271–306.Google Scholar

Mills, A, The Confluence of Public and Private International Law – Justice, Pluralism and Subsidiarity in the International Constitutional Ordering of Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Möller, K, The Global Model of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Möllers, C, ‘Transnational Governance without a Public Law’, in: Joerges, C, Sand, I-J & Teubner, G (eds), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Hart Publishing, 2004) 329–338.Google Scholar

Moran, M, ‘Review Article: Understanding the Regulatory State’, 32 British Journal of Political Science (2002) 391–413.Google Scholar

Muir Watt, H, ‘Private International Law beyond the Schism’, 2 Transnational Legal Theory (2011) 347–427.Google Scholar

Murphy, C N, & Yates, J A, The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) – Global Governance through Voluntary Consensus (Routledge, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myrholt, O, ‘Greening the Olympics’, 8 Our Planet (August 1996), available at: www.ourplanet.com/imgversn/82/myrholt.html.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, A, A Concise History of the Law of Nations (The Macmillan Company, 1954).Google Scholar

Oberthür, S, Regime-Interplay Management: Lessons from Environmental Policy and Law, in: Blome, K. et al., Contested Regime Collisions: Norm Fragmentation in World Society (Cambridge University Press, 2016) 88–108.Google Scholar

Panitch, L, ‘Rethinking the Role of the State’, in: Mittelman, J H (ed), Globalization and Critical Reflections (Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1996) 83–113.Google Scholar

Paramaguru, K, ‘The Not So Sustainable Sochi Winter Olympics’, Time (January 30, 2014).Google Scholar

Paulus, A L, ‘The International Legal System as a Constitution’, in: Dunoff, J L & Trachtman, J P (eds), Ruling the World? – Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2009) 69–109.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J, ‘Bridging Fragmentation and Unity: International Law as a Universe of Inter-Connected Islands’, 25 Michigan Journal of International Law (2003) 903–916.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J, Conflicts of Norms in Public International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Perez, O, ‘Private Environmental Governance as Ensemble Regulation: A Critical Exploration of Sustainability Indexes and the New Ensemble Politics’, 12 Theoretical Inquiries in Law (2011) 543–579.Google Scholar

Peters, A, ‘Membership in the Global Constitutional Community’, in Klabbers, J, Peters, A & Ulfstein, G (eds), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009) 153–262.Google Scholar

Peters, A, ‘Conclusions’, in: Klabbers, J, Peters, A & Ulfstein, G (eds), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2011) 342–351.Google Scholar

Peters, A, Förster, T, & Koechlin, L, ‘Towards Non-State Actors as Effective, Legitimate, and Accountable Standard Setters’, in: Peters, A et al. (eds), Non-State Actors as Standard Setters (Cambridge University Press, 2009) 492–562.Google Scholar

Powell, W W, ‘Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization’, 12 Research in Organizational Behavior (1990) 295–336.Google Scholar

Pushkareva, E, ‘United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)’, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2014) available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL.Google Scholar

Rawls, J, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Raz, J, ‘The Authority and Justification’, 14 Philosophy & Public Affairs (1985) 3–29.Google Scholar

Raz, J, ‘Authority and Justification’, in: Raz, J (ed), Authority (Basil Blackwell, 1990) 115–141.Google Scholar

Reinicke, W H, & Deng, F, Critical Choices – The United Nations, Networks, and the Future of Global Governance (International Development Research Centre, 2000).Google Scholar

Renou, X, ‘Resisting the Torch’, in: Hayes, G & Karamichas, J, Olympic Games, Mega-Events and Civil Societies (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012) 236–246.Google Scholar

Roche, M, Mega-Events and Modernity: Olympics and Expos in the Growth of Global Culture (Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar

Roche, M, ‘Mega-Events and Modernity Revisited: Globalization and the Case of the Olympics’, in: Horne, J & Manzenreiter, W (eds), Sports Mega-Events – Social Scientific Analyses of a Global Phenomenon (Wiley-Blackwell, 2006) 27–40.Google Scholar

Rödl, F, ‘Democratic Juridification without Statisation: Law of Conflict of Laws Instead of a World State’, 2 Transnational Legal Theory (2011) 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenau, J N, Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity (Princeton University Press 1990).Google Scholar

Roughan, N, Authorities – Conflicts, Cooperation, and Transnational Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Roughan, N, ‘From Authority to Authorities: Bridging the Social/Normative Divide’, in: Cotterrell, R & DelMar, M, Authority in Transnational Legal Theory – Theorising across Disciplines (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar

Sabel, C F, & Zeitlin, J, ‘Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU’, in: Sabel, C F & Zeitlin, J (eds), Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture (Oxford University Press, 2010) 1–28.Google Scholar

Sabel, C F, & Zeitlin, J, ‘Experimentalist Governance’ in: Levi-Faur, D (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) 169–183.Google Scholar

Sassen, S, ‘The Participation of States and Citizens in Global Governance’, 10 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (2003) 5–28.Google Scholar

Sassen, S, Territory, Authority, Rights – From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Sassen, S, A Sociology of Globalization (W W Norton & Company, 2007).Google Scholar

Sauer, H, ‘International Labour Organization’, in: Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2010), available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/epil.Google Scholar

Scharpf, F, Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research (Westview, 1997).Google Scholar

Scharpf, F, Governing in Europe Effective and Democratic? (Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schepel, H, The Constitution of Private Governance: Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets (Hart, 2005).Google Scholar

Scherer, A G, & Palazzo, G, ‘Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective’, 32 Academy of Management Review (2007) 1096–1120.Google Scholar

Schiff-Berman, P, ‘Global Legal Pluralism’, 80 Southern California Law Review (2007) 1155–1238.Google Scholar

Schiff-Berman, P, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Schmidt, R, ‘Local Practices, Transnational Solutions? The Role of Host Cities in the Cyclic Process of Environmental Regulation of Sports Mega-Events’, in: Wood, S et al. (eds), Transnational Business Governance Interactions (Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming in 2019).Google Scholar

Schneider, R U, ‘Was die Welt Zusammenhält’, NZZ Folio (February 2005).Google Scholar

Sciulli, D, Theory of Societal Constitutionalism – Foundations of a Non-Marxist Critical Theory (reprint edn., Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Scott, C, ‘Private Regulation of the Public Sector: A Neglected Facet of Contemporary Governance’, 29 Journal of Law and Society (2002) 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, C, Analysing Regulatory Space: Fragmented Resources and Institutional Design, [2001] Public Law 329–353.Google Scholar

Scott, J, ‘Social Network Analysis: Developments, Advances, and Prospects’, 1 Social Network Analyses and Mining (2011) 21–26.Google Scholar

Shan, W, Simons, P, & Singh, D, Redefining Sovereignty in International Economic Law (Hart 2008).Google Scholar

Shaw, M N, International Law (7th edn., Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Slaughter, A-M, ‘Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks’, 39 Government and Opposition (2004) 159–190.Google Scholar

Slaughter, A-M, A New World Order (Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Steinberg, R H, & Zasloff, J M, ‘Power and International Law’, 100 AJIL (2006) 64–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strange, S, ‘Territory, State, Authority, and Economy: A New Realist Ontology of Global Political Economy’, in: Cox, R W (ed), The New Realisms: Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Trade Order (UN University Press, 1997) 3–19.Google Scholar

Streck, C, ‘Global Public Policy Networks as Coalitions for Change’, in: Esty, D C & Ivanova, M H, Global Environmental Governance: Options and Opportunities (Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, 2002) 1–19.Google Scholar

Suchman, M C, ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches’, 20 The Academy of Management Review (1995) 571–610.Google Scholar

Talmadge, E, ‘Koreas Try Out Olympic Diplomacy at North Korean Ski Resort’, Washington Post (28 January 2018)Google Scholar

Tams, C J, ‘League of Nations’ in: Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2006), available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/epil.Google Scholar

Teubner, G, ‘Foreword: Legal Regimes of Global Non-State Actors’, in: Teubner, G. (ed), Global Law without the State (Dartmouth Publishing, 1997) xiii–xvii.Google Scholar

Teubner, G, ‘Global Bukowina’: Legal Pluralism in the World Society’, in: Teubner, G. (ed), Global Law without a State (Dartmouth Publishing 1997) 3–28.Google Scholar

Teubner, G, ‘Coincidentia Oppositorum: Hybrid Networks beyond Contract and Organization’, in: Amstutz, M & Teubner, G (eds), Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Co-Operation (Hart Publishing, 2009) 3–30.Google Scholar

Teubner, G, Constitutional Fragments, Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Thürer, D, ‘Soft Law’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP, 2009), available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL.Google Scholar

Tully, J, ‘The Imperialism of Modern Constitutional Democracy’, in: Loughlin, M & Walker, N (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2007) 315–338.Google Scholar

Tully, J, Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Tuori, K, ‘Transnational Law: On Legal Hybrids and Legal Perspectivism’, in: Maduro, M, Tuori, K & Sankari, S (eds), Transnational Law – Rethinking European Law and Legal Thinking (Cambridge University Press, 2014) 11–57.Google Scholar

Twinning, W, Globalization & Legal Theory (Butterworths, 2000).Google Scholar

Twinning, W, General Jurisprudence, Understanding Law from a Global Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Ulfstein, G, ‘Institutions and Competences’, in Klabbers, J, Peters, A & Ulfstein, G (eds), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009) 45–80.Google Scholar

Venzke, I, ‘International Bureaucracies from a Political Science Perspective – Agency, Authority and International Institutional Law’, 9 German Journal of International Law (2008) 1401–1428.Google Scholar

Venzke, I, ‘Between Power and Persuasion: On International Institutions’ Authority in Making Law’ 4 Transnational Legal Theory (2013) 354–373.Google Scholar

von Bogdandy, A, Dann, P, & Goldmann, M, ‘Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities’, 9 German Journal of International Law (2008) 1375–1400.Google Scholar

Waddell, S, Global Action Networks: Creating Our Future Together (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waddell, S, & Khagram, S, ‘Multi-Stakeholder Global Networks: Emerging Systems for the Global Common Good’, in: Glasbergen, P, Biermann, F & Mol, APJ (eds), Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development: Reflection on Theory and Practice (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007) 261–287.Google Scholar

Wade, R, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (Princeton University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Wagner, M, ‘Non-State Actors’, in: Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Wai, R, ‘Transnational Liftoff and Juridical Touchdown: The Regulatory Function of International Law in an Era of Globalization, 40 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (2002) 209–274.Google Scholar

Wai, R, ‘The Interlegality of Transnational Private Law’, 71 Law and Contemporary Problems (2008) 107–127.Google Scholar

Walker, N, ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’ 65 Modern Law Review (2002) 317–359.Google Scholar

Walker, N, ‘The Post-National Horizon of Constitutionalism and Public Law: Paradigm Extension or Paradigm Exhaustion’, in: Mac Amhlaigh, C, Michelon, C & Walker, N (eds), After Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2013) 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, N, Intimations of Global Law (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Walter, C, ‘Subjects of International Law’, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2007), http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL (last accessed 19 January 2018).Google Scholar

Walz, K N, Theory of International Politics (McGraw-Hill, 1979).Google Scholar

Ward, H, ‘The ISO 26000 International Guidance Standard on Social Responsibility: Implications for Public Policy and Transnational Democracy’ 12 Theoretical Inquiries in Law (2011) 665–718.Google Scholar

Watts, J, ‘Rio 2016: “The Olympics Has Destroyed My Home”’, The Guardian (19 July 2015).Google Scholar

Webb, K, ‘ISO 26000: Bridging the Public/Private Divide in Transnational Business Governance Interactions’, Osgoode CLPE Research Report No. 21/2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, M, ‘Politics as a Vocation’, in: Gerth, H H and Wright Mills, C (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1948) 77–128.Google Scholar

Weber, M, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Weiler, J H H, ‘Prologue: Global and Pluralist Constitutionalism – Some Doubts’, in: de Búrca, G & Weiler, J H H (eds), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2011) 8–18.Google Scholar

Wheatley, S, ‘Democratic Governance beyond the State’, in: Peters, A et al. (eds), Non-State Actors as Standard Setters (Cambridge University Press, 2009) 215–240.Google Scholar

Whitson, D, ‘Vancouver 2010: The Saga of Eagleridge Bluffs’, in: Hayes, G & Karamichas, J, Olympic Games, Mega-Events and Civil Societies (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012) 219–235.Google Scholar

Whitson, D, & Horne, J, ‘Underestimated Costs and Overestimated Benefits? Comparing the Outcomes of Sport Mega-Events in Canada and Japan’, in: Horne, J. & Manzenreiter, W. (eds), Sports Mega-Events – Social Scientific Analyses of a Global Phenomenon (Wiley-Blackwell, 2006) 73–89.Google Scholar

Williamson, J, The Political Economy of Policy Reform (Institute for International Economics, 1994).Google Scholar

Williamson, O E, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Williamson, O E, ‘Hierarchies, Markets and Power in the Economy: An Economic Perspective’, 4 Industrial and Corporate Change (1995) 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfrum, R, ‘Kontrolle Auswärtiger Gewalt’, 56 Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer (1997) 38–66.Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R, ‘Legitimacy of International Law from a Legal Perspective – Some Introductory Considerations’, in: Wolfrum, R & Röben, V (eds), Legitimacy in International Law (Springer, 2008) 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfrum, R, ‘International Law of Cooperation’, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2010) available at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/epil.Google Scholar

Wood, S, ‘The Meaning of the ‘Sphere of Influence’ in ISO 26000’, in: Henriques, A (ed), Understanding ISO 26000. A Practical Approach to Social Responsibility (BSI, 2011) 115–130.Google Scholar

Wood, S, ‘Transnational Governance Interactions: A Critical Review of the Legal Literature’, Research Paper No. 35, 11 Osgoode Hall Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series (2015).Google Scholar

Wood, S, et al., ‘The Interactive Dynamics of Transnational Business Governance: A Challenge for Transnational Legal Theory’, 6 Transnational Legal Theory (2015) 333–369.Google Scholar

Wood, S, et al. (eds), Transnational Business Governance Interactions (Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Wouters, J, Marx, A, & Hachez, N, ‘In Search of a Balanced Relationship: Public and Private Food Safety Standards and International Law’, Working Paper No. 29, June 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, M, ‘Fragmentation or Interaction: The WTO, Fisheries Subsidies, and International Law’, 8 World Trade Review (2009) 477–515.Google Scholar

Young, M (ed), Regime Interaction in International Law – Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Young, M A, Trading Fish, Saving Fish: The Interaction between Regimes in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Zaring, D, ‘International Law by Other Means: The Twilight Existence of International Financial Regulatory Organizations’, 33 Texas International Law Journal (1998) 281–330.Google Scholar

Zumbansen, P, ‘Transnational Legal Pluralism’, 1 Transnational Legal Theory (2010) 141–189.Google Scholar

Zumbansen, P, ‘Defining the Space of Transnational Law: Legal Theory, Global Governance & Legal Pluralism’, Osgoode Hall Law School Research Paper No. 21/2011, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zürn, M, ‘From Constitutional Rule to Loosely Coupled Spheres of Liquid Authority: A Reflexive Approach’, 9 International Theory (2017) 261–285.Google Scholar

Zürn, M, Binder, M, & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M, ‘International Authority and Its Politicization’, 4 International Theory (2012) 69–106.Google Scholar