Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables, figures and boxes
- List of Contributors
- Foreword
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Long-term care quality systems based on ‘professionalism’
- Part III Long-term care quality systems based on regulatory inspection frameworks
- Part IV Long-term care quality systems based on data measurement and public reporting
- 10 Monitoring the quality of long-term care in Finland
- 11 Regulation of long-term care in the United States
- 12 Long-term care for the elderly in Canada: progress towards an integrated system
- 13 Regulating the quality of long-term aged care in New Zealand
- Part V Long-term care quality systems and developing regulatory systems
- Part VI Conclusion
- Index
- References
11 - Regulation of long-term care in the United States
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2014
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables, figures and boxes
- List of Contributors
- Foreword
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Long-term care quality systems based on ‘professionalism’
- Part III Long-term care quality systems based on regulatory inspection frameworks
- Part IV Long-term care quality systems based on data measurement and public reporting
- 10 Monitoring the quality of long-term care in Finland
- 11 Regulation of long-term care in the United States
- 12 Long-term care for the elderly in Canada: progress towards an integrated system
- 13 Regulating the quality of long-term aged care in New Zealand
- Part V Long-term care quality systems and developing regulatory systems
- Part VI Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
The market for nursing home care and other long-term care services is one of the most heavily regulated sectors in the US economy. Although long-term care regulations often serve secondary ends, such as controlling provider supply or regulating the price of services, the majority of these rules are designed to ensure the quality and appropriateness of services. There are different theories for the presence of regulation but a standard explanation is that they exist to address some type of market failure, such as consumers’ inability to assess, monitor and respond to low-quality care. Thus, government regulation can assist uninformed consumers by developing quality standards, evaluating whether those standards are met, and enforcing improvement when standards are not met. In addition, regulatory standards address the market and political power of nursing facilities and chains relative to residents, who are often sick, elderly and vulnerable.
While similar factors could apply to regulation of other industries, the large degree of public financing for long-term care services in the United States further justifies the extensive governmental intervention. Indeed, although the government itself owns very few long-term care facilities, the federal and state governments are the primary payers for services delivered in these settings. Medicare, a federal entitlement programme of health insurance coverage for the elderly and other protected classes, pays for the majority of post-acute (following acute hospital discharge) nursing home, home health and rehabilitative care. This programme is complemented by Medicaid, a means-tested social insurance programme for certain categories of individuals, primarily regulated and financed by the federal government but administered by the individual states. Medicaid is the primary payer for long-term services and supports, including the large majority of chronic nursing home care, in the United States.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Regulating Long-Term Care QualityAn International Comparison, pp. 289 - 323Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
- 5
- Cited by