Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:11:24.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Long-term care for the elderly in Canada: progress towards an integrated system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

John P. Hirdes
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo
Vahe Kehyayan
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo
Vincent Mor
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Tiziana Leone
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Anna Maresso
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Hospital and physician services for Canadians of all ages are shared responsibilities of the federal government and the governments of ten provinces and three territories. However, long-term care is regulated, funded and delivered only under the auspices of provincial/territorial governments with no major role for the federal government. Therefore, one cannot accurately refer to the ‘Canadian healthcare system’ as a singular entity. Rather healthcare, and long-term care, is delivered by thirteen different systems with national legislation guiding some, but not all, aspects of service delivery, regulation and administration (Beland and Shapiro, 1994). In addition, healthcare in Canada is provided by a mixture of public and privately funded services, and the balance between those sources of payment varies by region. The complexity of the Canadian healthcare mosaic has increased further with the introduction of regional authorities responsible for ‘local’ management of health services in the last two decades.

Rather than provide an encyclopedic summary of the regulatory structure of healthcare for the elderly in all regions of Canada, this chapter will focus on the experience of the province of Ontario to illustrate the experience of the country’s most populous province. It is also the province with the most fully integrated health information system across the continuum of care for older people, which is intended to improve clinical practice, quality, public accountability and funding of health services. That said, one must remain aware that this overview represents a single province’s experience that shares much, but not all, in common with other regions of the country. The chapter begins with a brief overview of the three levels of government (federal, provincial, regional) that have an influence over healthcare in Canada. The remainder deals specifically with the continuum of care for the elderly in Ontario.

Type
Chapter
Information
Regulating Long-Term Care Quality
An International Comparison
, pp. 324 - 356
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Accreditation Canada (2010). Annual report 2010. Available at: . Accessed 5 January 2012.
Accreditation Canada (2011). Accreditation Canada: driving quality health services. Available at: . Accessed 29 August 2011.
Beland, F. and Shapiro, E. (1994). Ten provinces in search of long term policy. In Marshall, V. and McPherson, B. (eds.), Aging: Canadian Perspectives. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, pp. 245–67.Google Scholar
Bernabei, R., Gray, L., Hirdes, J., Pei, X., Henrard, J. C., Jonsson, P. V., Onder, G., Gambassi, G., Ikegami, N., Ranhoff, A. H., Carpenter, I. G., Harwood, R. H., Fries, B. E., Morris, J. N. and Steel, K. (2009). International gerontology. In Halter, J. B., Ouslander, J. G., Tinetti, M. E., Studenski, S., High, K. P. and Asthana, S. (eds.), Hazzard’s Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology (6th edn). New York: McGraw Medical, pp. 69–96.Google Scholar
Canadian Home Care Association (CHCA) (2008). Portraits of Home Care in Canada. Toronto: CHCA.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) (2004). Complex Continuing Care in Ontario: Resident Demographics and System Characteristics. Ottawa: CIHI.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) (2007). Public-Sector Expenditures and Utilization of Home Care Services in Canada: Exploring the Data. Ottawa: CIHI.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) (2009a). Healthcare in Canada 2009: a Decade in Review. Ottawa: CIHI.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) (2009b). Analysis in Brief: Exploring Hospital Mental Health Service Use in Ontario, 2007–2008. Ottawa: CIHI.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) (2009c). Analysis in Brief: Alternate Level of Care in Canada, 2009. Ottawa: CIHI.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) (2010). National Expenditure Trends, 1975–2010. Ottawa: CIHI.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) (2011). Healthcare in Canada 2011: a Focus on Seniors and Aging, Ottawa: CIHI.Google Scholar
CARF International (2011). Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities. Available at: . Accessed 8 August 2011.
Central East Local Health Integration Network. (2010). Multi-Sector Accountability Agreement (MSAAs). Available at: . Accessed 26 August 2011.
Costa, A. P. and Hirdes, J. P. (2010). Clinical characteristics and service needs of alternate-level-of-care patients waiting for long-term care in Ontario hospitals. Healthcare Policy, 6(1): 32–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Dalby, D. M., Hirdes, J. P. and Fries, B. E. (2005). Risk adjustment methods for home care quality indicators (HCQIs) based on the minimum data set for home care. BMC Health Services Research, 5(1): 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flood, C. M. and Choudhry, S. (2004). Strengthening the foundations: modernizing the Canada Health Act. In McIntosh, T., Forest, P. G. and Marchildon, G. P. (eds.), Romanow Papers: The Governance of Healthcare in Canada. University of Toronto Press, pp. 312–45.Google Scholar
Forbes, W. F., Jackson, J. A. and Krause, A. S. (1987). Institutionalization of the Elderly in Canada. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Fries, B. E., Schneider, D. P., Foley, W. J., Gavazzi, M., Burke, R. and Cornelius, E. (1994). Refining a case-mix measure for nursing homes: Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III). Medical Care, 32(7): 668–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, L. C., Berg, K., Fries, B. E., Henrard, J. C., Hirdes, J. P., Steel, K. and Morris, J. N. (2009). Sharing clinical information across care settings: the birth of an integrated assessment system. BMC Health Services Research, 29(9): 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health Council of Canada (2012). Seniors in Need: Caregivers in Distress. Toronto: Health Council of Canada.Google Scholar
Health Quality Ontario (HQO) (2011). Quality Monitor: 2011 Report on Ontario’s Health System. Toronto: HQO.Google Scholar
Hirdes, J. P. (1997). Development of a cross-walk from the Minimum Data Set 2.0 to the Alberta Classification System. Healthcare Management Forum, 10(1): 27–9, 32–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirdes, J. P. (2001). Long term care funding in Canada: a policy mosaic. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 13(2–3): 69–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirdes, J. P. (2006). Addressing the health needs of frail elderly people: Ontario’s experience with an integrated health information system. Age and Ageing, 35(4): 329–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirdes, J. P., Botz, C. A., Kozak, J. and Lepp, V. (1996). Identifying an appropriate case-mix measure for chronic care: evidence from an Ontario pilot study. Healthcare Management Forum, 9(1): 40–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirdes, J. P., Fries, B. E., Morris, J. N., Ikegami, N., Zimmerman, D., Dalby, D. M., Aliaga, P., Hammer, S. and Jones, R. (2004). Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs) based on the MDS-HC. The Gerontologist, 44(5): 665–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirdes, J. P., Fries, B. E., Morris, J. N., Steel, K., Mor, V., Frijters, D., Jonsson, P., LaBine, S., Schalm, C., Stones, M. J., Teare, G., Smith, T., Marhaba, M. and Perez, E. (1999). Integrated health information systems based on the RAI/MDS series of assessment instruments. Healthcare Management Forum, 12(4): 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirdes, J. P., Ljunggren, G., Morris, J. N., Frijters, D. H., Finne Soveri, H., Gray, L., Björkgren, M. and Gilgen, R. (2008). Reliability of the interRAI suite of assessment instruments: a 12-country study of an integrated health information system. BMC Health Services Research, 8: 277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirdes, J. P., Marhaba, M., Smith, T. F., Clyburn, L., Mitchell, L., Lemick, R. A., Curtin Telegdi, N., Pérez, E., Prendergast, P., Rabinowitz, T. and Yamauchi, K. (2001). Development of the Resident Assessment Instrument – Mental Health (RAI-MH). Hospital Quarterly, 4(2): 44–51.Google Scholar
Hirdes, J. P, Mitchell, L., Maxwell, C. J. and White, N. (2011). Beyond the ‘iron lungs of gerontology’: using evidence to shape the future of nursing homes in Canada. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30(3): 371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirdes, J. P., Poss, J. W., Fries, B. E., Smith, T. F., Maxwell, C. J., Wu, C. and Jantzi, M. (2010). Canadian Staff Time and Resource Intensity Verification (CAN-STRIVE) Project: Validation of the Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) and Resource Utilization Groups for Home Care (RUG-III/HC) Case-mix Systems. Final Report to Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
Hirdes, J. P., Sinclair, D. G., King, J., McKinley, J. and Tuttle, P. (2003). From anecdotes to evidence: complex continuing care at the dawn of the information age. In Fries, B. E. and Fahey, C. J. (eds.), Implementing the Resident Assessment Instrument: Case Studies of Policymaking for Long-Term Care in Eight Countries, New York: Milbank Memorial Fund. Available at: . Accessed 21 August 2013.Google Scholar
Hirdes, J. P., Smith, T. F., Rabinowitz, T., Yamauchi, K., Pérez, E., Curtin Telegdi, N., Prendergast, P., Morris, J. N., Ikegami, N., Phillips, C. and Fries, B. E. (2002). The Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health (RAI-MH)©: inter-rater reliability and convergent validity. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 29(4): 419–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. N., Hirdes, J. P., Poss, J. W., Kelly, M., Berg, K., Fries, B. E. and Morris, J. N. (2010). Adjustment of nursing home quality indicators. BMC Health Services Research, 10: 96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladak, N. (1998). Understanding How Ontario Hospitals Are Funded: An Introduction (RD#6–11). Toronto: Joint Policy and Planning Committee.Google Scholar
Local Health System Integration Act (2006). Available at: . Accessed 26 August 2011.
Martin, L., Hirdes, J. P., Morris, J. N., Montague, P., Rabinowitz, T. and Fries, B. E. (2009). Validating the Mental Health Assessment Protocols (MHAPs) in the Resident Assessment Instrument Mental Health (RAI-MH). Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 7: 646–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. (2011a). Community care access centres. Available at: . Accessed 26 August 2011.
Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. (2011b). Community care access centres: client services policy manual. Available at: . Accessed 15 August 2011.
Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. (2011c). Local health integration networks. Available at: . Accessed 26 August 2011.
Mor, V., Angelelli, J., Gifford, D., Morris, J. and Moore, T. (2003). Benchmarking and quality in residential and nursing homes: lessons from the US. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(3): 258–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, S. (2004). Drug spending in Canada: recent trends and cause. Medical Care, 42(7): 635–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ontario Association of Community Care Access Centres (OACCAC) (2011). ICCP Palliative Care Impact Assessment Framework. Available at: . Accessed 27 August 2012.
Ontario Government (2010a). Community Care Access Corporations Act, 2001. Available at: . Accessed 26 August 2011.
Ontario Government (2010b). Excellent Care for All Act. Available at: . Accessed 26 August 2011.
Ontario Government (2010c). Long-Term Care Homes Act, 2010, S.O. 2007, Chapter 8. Available at: . Accessed 26 August 2011.
Ontario Government (2010d). Ontario health quality. Available at: . Accessed 14 September 2011.
Ontario Government (2010e). Ontario Regulation 79/10 made Under the Long-Term Care Homes Act, 2007. Available at: . Accessed 26 August 2011.
Ontario Government (2010f). The Retirement Homes Act, 2010. Available at: . Accessed 27August 2012.
Ontario Home Care Association (OHCA) (2010). Report on the OHCA roundtable on rehabilitation in home care. Available at: . Accessed 10 September 2011.
Ontario Home Care Association (OHCA) (2011). Home care in Ontario: facts and figures. Available at: . Accessed 10 September 2011.
Ontario Hospital Association (OHA) (2003). Hospital Report: Complex Continuing Care Hospital-Specific Results, Toronto: OHA.Google Scholar
Ontario Hospital Association (OHA) (2010). Health system facts and figures. Available at: . Accessed 10 September 2011.
Poss, J. W., Hirdes, J. P., Fries, B. E., McKillop, I. and Chase, M. (2008). Validation of Resource Utilization Groups Version III for Home Care (RUG-III/HC): evidence from a Canadian home care jurisdiction. Medical Care, 46(4): 380–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romanow, R. (2002). Building on Values: the Future of Healthcare in Canada – Final Report. Ottawa: Commission on the Future of Healthcare in Canada.Google Scholar
Star, Toronto (2010). Seniors at risk in retirement home, investigation reveals. Available at: . Accessed 27 August 2012.
Walker, D. (2011). Caring for our aging population and addressing alternate level of care. Available at: . Accessed 27 August 2012.
Wellington, Waterloo Local Health Integration Network (2010). Ministry LHIN Performance Agreement (MLPA). Available at: . Accessed 26 August 2012.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×