We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 December 2017
INTRODUCTION
This chapter addresses the interpretation of the refugee definition in Article 1A(2) Refugee Convention with respect to refugee protection claims of individuals forced to flee from their country of origin due to armed conflict.
ARMED CONFLICT AND REFUGEE STATUS DETERMINATION
Since IHL and international criminal law are specifically designed for armed conflict as opposed to situations of peace, they can only inform the interpretation of the refugee definition if an armed conflict in the country of origin existed, exists or is likely to arise and if the refugee protection claim is related to the armed conflict. The refugee definition cannot solely be interpreted in light of these bodies of international law in order to ensure that claims related to situations of violence which do not constitute armed conflicts are addressed. However, in order to determine whether these branches of international law can complement and strengthen the interpretation of Article 1A(2) Refugee Convention, decision-makers ought to determine whether the situation in the country of origin was, is or is likely to constitute an armed conflict.
In a number of instances, national refugee status decision-makers and UNHCR considered the fact that there is or was an armed conflict in the country of origin relevant for the interpretation and application of the refugee definition. For example, courts in the UK and New Zealand considered the situation in Somalia a “civil war”. Guidelines adopted by the Refugee and Immigration Board of Canada apply specifically to refugee claimants from “situations of civil war”. The US Board of Immigration Appeals stated that Sri Lanka was experiencing “civil unrest in the form of an armed conflict”. The Federal Court of Canada found that Sierra Leone was in “a tragic situation of war or armed conflict”. In its Eligibility Guidelines, UNHCR considered the situations in Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Colombia, Iraq, and Somalia as armed conflicts at different points in time. Yet national decision-makers and UNHCR do not necessarily intend to classify a situation as an armed conflict in the sense of IHL and may well base their assessments on varying definitions of armed conflict.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
