Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Brick Foxhole (1945): Richard Brooks’s American Vision
- 3 The Muted Voices of Conscience and Responsibility in Crisis (1950)
- 4 Deadline—U.S.A. (1952): A Fox Film of Fact
- 5 “Man Against the Times”: Conformity, Anti-Statism, and the “Unknown” Korean War in Battle Circus (1953)
- 6 Captured Interiors: Female Performances in The Last Time I Saw Paris (1954) and The Happy Ending (1969)
- 7 Blackboard Jungle (1955): A Cinematic Education
- 8 Hunting and the Economics of Adaptation: The Last Hunt (1956) and The Professionals (1966)
- 9 The Curse of Money: Negotiating Marriage in The Catered Affair (1956)
- 10 Adapting Modernism: Richard Brooks and The Brothers Karamazov (1958)
- 11 Haunted: Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958)
- 12 A Bite of Salvation
- 13 “Monstrous Cinemascope”: Richard Brooks Adapts Sweet Bird of Youth (1962)
- 14 Adapting the Unadaptables: Lord Jim (1965)
- 15 Adaptation as Mutation: In Cold Blood (1967)
- 16 Looking for Mr. Good Guy: Anatomizing ’70s Fracture and Fragmentation
- 17 Failing to Locate Wrong is Right (1982) and What that Reveals about Cinematic Reality
- Bibliography
- Index
13 - “Monstrous Cinemascope”: Richard Brooks Adapts Sweet Bird of Youth (1962)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2025
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Brick Foxhole (1945): Richard Brooks’s American Vision
- 3 The Muted Voices of Conscience and Responsibility in Crisis (1950)
- 4 Deadline—U.S.A. (1952): A Fox Film of Fact
- 5 “Man Against the Times”: Conformity, Anti-Statism, and the “Unknown” Korean War in Battle Circus (1953)
- 6 Captured Interiors: Female Performances in The Last Time I Saw Paris (1954) and The Happy Ending (1969)
- 7 Blackboard Jungle (1955): A Cinematic Education
- 8 Hunting and the Economics of Adaptation: The Last Hunt (1956) and The Professionals (1966)
- 9 The Curse of Money: Negotiating Marriage in The Catered Affair (1956)
- 10 Adapting Modernism: Richard Brooks and The Brothers Karamazov (1958)
- 11 Haunted: Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958)
- 12 A Bite of Salvation
- 13 “Monstrous Cinemascope”: Richard Brooks Adapts Sweet Bird of Youth (1962)
- 14 Adapting the Unadaptables: Lord Jim (1965)
- 15 Adaptation as Mutation: In Cold Blood (1967)
- 16 Looking for Mr. Good Guy: Anatomizing ’70s Fracture and Fragmentation
- 17 Failing to Locate Wrong is Right (1982) and What that Reveals about Cinematic Reality
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
As soon as I saw that first big close-up of myself on that monstrous Cinemascope, I tell you, I ran right out of there! I screamed for a taxi, and I haven't stopped running since.
—Alexandra Del Lago, in Brooks's film, remembering the terrifying preview of her comeback movie Richard Brooks's wide-screen adaptation (1962) of Tennessee Williams's Sweet Bird of Youth (1959) is shadowed by and projected onto the metaphorics of the monstrous. The trope appears frequently in both the play and the film, the essential conflict of which is neatly summarized in Alexandra Del Lago's famous formulation—“When monster meets monster, one monster must give way, AND IT WILL NEVER BE ME”—and self-loathingly elaborated and confessed in the flashbacked memory of her comeback preview, words and images that writer-director Brooks (trying to resuture the Broadway play's meta-theatrically modernist, subversively estranged dramatic language and design into a more or less familiar Hollywood commercial product) slyly and reflexively added to a film he was forced, against his artistic judgment and hard-won professional experience, to shoot in Cinemascope.The locus classicus for the conceptual practice of “monstrous Cinemascope” is probably Richard Fleischer's 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954), based on Jules Verne's classic novel, one of Hollywood's earliest Cinemascope films and the Disney Studio's very first. As J. P. Telotte has convincingly argued, virtually everything about this movie is monstrous (in various senses of the term: enormous, hideous, terrifying, unnatural, malformed, repellent, evil, abject): the wide-screen process itself, of course, as well as the budget, the hype, the risk, the special effects, the language, the visual style, and, most tellingly perhaps, the narrative. The story is driven by an expeditionary quest for a mysterious, ship-sinking, South-Sea monster, which turns out to be the prototype submarine, Nautilus, created by its mad-scientist Captain Nemo (James Mason), a “self-professed ‘avenger’ against humanity's own monstrous nature,” a human “monster” himself, whose “facial features” in “extreme [Cinemascope-distorting] close-ups … as he plays his organ” “evok[e] a cinematic tradition of monstrous madmen, specifically recalling” here Lon Chaney in The Phantom of the Opera (1925). Nemo is rehumanized and redeemed in the battle against the giant squid, a “more traditional cinematic monster,” and in his decision to blow up his nuclear-powered home-island base, “produc[ing] a familiar mushroom cloud” that “marks the final monster of the film.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- ReFocus: The Literary Films of Richard Brooks , pp. 183 - 199Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2023