Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:13:47.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3.3 - Europe’s ‘Social Market’ and the Disembedding of Labour Protection

from Part III - Market Constitutionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2021

Emilios Christodoulidis
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access

Summary

What the Rome Treaty inaugurated, what set the European project on its course and fuelled its rapid acceleration, was an original asymmetry, a coupure into the fabric of European societies. It cut into the political economy in order to replicate at the European level the radical separation of the political from the economic system, that was the hallmark of the liberal settlement of post-war Germany. But once uploaded to the transnational, European, level, the separation generated an asymmetry between the differentiated systems, the economic system uploaded to the transnational level and the political system left tied to democratic processes and solidarity-based institutions at the national level, an asymmetry that assumed its own momentum. The magnitude of the breach and the effects of the asymmetric configuration of supranational and national, can only be appreciated in retrospect. This chapter will explore those effects, that have gradually led to the disembedding of Europe’s economy from its society.1 As ‘ordoliberalism’ was stormed by ‘neoliberalism’, to the detriment of what the post-war consensus had allowed to function on a human scale, this was a disembedding that became increasingly difficult to control, let alone reverse. We are today depressingly familiar with the way in which the institutionalisation of the separation between market economy and social protection was set on a trajectory where it became productive for capital, to the point where the profit margins have become staggering and the effects devastating. It is not the way the story of the European Union is customarily told, to focus it on asymmetry, on breach, on time, and on the surplus value extracted from the processes of evasion and elision that it sets in motion. But with hindsight, it is nevertheless what holds the key to the European misadventure.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Redress of Law
Globalisation, Constitutionalism and Market Capture
, pp. 365 - 394
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×