Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:39:03.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Apathy and Revolution

Temporal Sensibilities in Contemporary Mongolia

from Part I - Decision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

James Laidlaw
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Barbara Bodenhorn
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Holbraad
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Recovering the Human Subject
Freedom, Creativity and Decision
, pp. 74 - 94
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achilli, L. (2014). ‘Disengagement from Politics: Nationalism, Political Identity, and the Everyday in a Palestinian Refugee Camp in Jordan’. Critique of Anthropology 34(2): 234257.Google Scholar
Baabar, (2010 [1990]). ‘Büü Mart!’. The History of Mongolia. In Sneath, D. and Kaplonski, C. (eds). Folkestone: Global Oriental. 3: 10281038.Google Scholar
Beck, L. et al. (2007). The Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar: World Bank.Google Scholar
Billé, F. (2015). Sinophobia: Anxiety, Violence and the Making of Mongolian Identity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1979): Algeria 1960. Nice, R., trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bulag, U. E. (1998). Nationalism and Hybridity in Mongolia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Candea, M. (2011). ‘“Our Division of the Universe”: Making a Space for the Non-Political in the Anthropology of Politics’. Current Anthropology 52(3): 309334.Google Scholar
Carnaghan, E. (1996). ‘Alienation, Apathy, or Ambivalence? “Don’t Knows” and Democracy in Russia’. Slavic Review 55(2): 325363.Google Scholar
Combellick-Bidney, S. (2012). ‘Mongolia’s mining controversies and the politics of place’. Change in Democratic Mongolia. In Dierkes, J. (ed.). Leiden, NL, Brill: 271296.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. (1999). Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fish, M. S. (1998). ‘Mongolia: Democracy Without Prerequisites’. Journal of Democracy 9(3): 127141. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/jod.1998.0044.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. (2007). ‘Commentary on Jane Guyer’. American Ethnologist 34(3): 426429.Google Scholar
Guyer, J. I. (2007). ‘Prophecy and the Near Future: Thoughts on Macroeconomic, Evangelical, and Punctuated Time’. American Ethnologist 34(3): 409421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, J. I. with Denzer, L. (2009). ‘“The Craving for Intelligibility”: Speech and Silence on the Economy Under Structural Adjustment and Military Rule in Nigeria’. Economic Persuasions. Gudeman, S. (ed). New York, NY, Berghahn: 97117.Google Scholar
Horton, R. (1993). Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West: Essays on Magic, Religion, and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, C. (1992). ‘The Moral Authority of the Past in Post-Socialist Mongolia’. Religion, State and Society 20(3 & 4): 375389.Google Scholar
Humphrey, C. (1997). ‘Exemplars and rules: Aspects of the discourse of moralities in Mongolia’. The Ethnography of Moralities. In Howell, S. (ed.). London: Routledge: 2547.Google Scholar
Humphrey, C. (2008). ‘Reassembling Individual Subjects’. Anthropological Theory 8(4): 357380.Google Scholar
Højer, L. and Pedersen, M. (2018). Urban Hunters: Dealing and Dreaming in Times of Transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplonski, C. (2004). Truth, History and Politics in Mongolia. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. (1996). ‘Modernity and Enchantment: The Image of the Devil in Popular African Christianity’. Conversion to modernities: the globalization of Christianity. van der Veer, P. (ed.). New York and London, Routledge: 199230.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, H. (2006). ‘Economy of Dreams: Hope in Global Capitalism and Its Critiques’. Cultural Anthropology 21(2): 147172.Google Scholar
Oushakine, S. (2000). ‘In the State of Post-Soviet Aphasia: Symbolic Development in Contemporary Russia’. Europe-Asia Studies 52(6): 9911016.Google Scholar
Pedersen, M. and Højer, L. (2008). ‘Lost in Transition: Fuzzy Porperty and Leaky Selves in Ulaanbaatar’. Ethnos 73(1): 7396.Google Scholar
Robbins, J. (2004). Becoming Sinners: Christianity and Moral Torment in a Papua New Guinea Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, J. (2007). ‘Continuity Thinking and the Problem of Christian Culture: Belief, Time, and the Anthropology of Christianity’. Current Anthropology 48(1): 538.Google Scholar
Robbins, J. (2011). ‘On Messianic Promise’. Echoes of the Tambaran: Masculinity, History and the Subject in the Work of Donald F. Tuzin. In Lipset, D. and Roscoe, P. (eds.). Canberra, ANU E Press: 183194.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2007). ‘The Concept of the Political’. The Concept of the Political. Schmitt, C.. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press: 179.Google Scholar
Sneath, D. (2002). ‘Reciprocity and Notions of Corruption in Contemporary Mongolia’. Mongolian Studies 25: 8599.Google Scholar
Sneath, D. (2006). ‘Transacting and Enacting: Corruption, Obligation and the Use of Monies in Mongolia’. Ethnos 71(1): 89112.Google Scholar
Sneath, D. (2010). ‘Political mobilization and the construction of collective identity in Mongolia’. Central Asian Survey 29(3): 251267.Google Scholar
Tsedevdamba, O. (2016). ‘The Secret Driving Force Behind Mongolia’s Successful Democracy’, PRISM 6(1): 140152, http://cco.ndu.edu/Portals/96/Documents/prism/prism_6-1/Secret%20Driving%20Force.pdf (accessed 22 September 2017).Google Scholar
Upton, C. (2012). ‘Mining, resistance and pastoral livelihoods in contemporary Mongolia’. Change in Democratic Mongolia. In Dierkes, J. (ed.). Leiden, NL, Brill: 223248.Google Scholar
Upton, C. (2014). ‘Communities, culture and commodification: Mongolia’s new resource politics’. Inner Asia 16: 252274.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (2012). ‘The “Objectivity” of Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy’. Max Weber: Complete Methodological Writings. In Bruun, H. H. and Whimster, S. (eds). London: Routledge: 100138.Google Scholar
Zaloom, C. (2007). ‘Future knowledge’. American Ethnologist 34(3): 444446.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A. E. (2012). ‘Local leaders between obligation and corruption: state workplaces, the discourse of “moral decay”, and “eating money” in the Mongolian province’. Change in Democratic Mongolia. In Dierkes, J. (ed.). NL, Brill: 83109.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×