Book contents
- Recentering the World
- Law in Context
- Recentering the World
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Archives and Databases Consulted
- Treaties, Agreements, and Legislation
- Cases
- Introduction
- Part I Preserving Stateliness, 1850–1894
- Part II Asserting Sovereignty, 1895–1921
- Part III Internationalisms, 1922–2001
- Glossary of Chinese and Japanese Names
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2022
Book contents
- Recentering the World
- Law in Context
- Recentering the World
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Archives and Databases Consulted
- Treaties, Agreements, and Legislation
- Cases
- Introduction
- Part I Preserving Stateliness, 1850–1894
- Part II Asserting Sovereignty, 1895–1921
- Part III Internationalisms, 1922–2001
- Glossary of Chinese and Japanese Names
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Recentering the WorldChina and the Transformation of International Law, pp. 286 - 310Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Abbenhuis, Maartje. The Hague Conferences and International Politics, 1898–1915. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, Georges M. “The Newly Independent States and the Rules of International Law: An Outline.” Howard Law Journal 8, no. 2 (1962): 97–121.Google Scholar
Abtahi, Hirad, and Webb, Philippa, eds. The Genocide Convention: The Travaux Preparatoires. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afinogenov, Gregory. Spies and Scholars: Chinese Secrets and Imperial Russia’s Quest for World Power. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Ahl, Bjorn. “The Rise of China and International Human Rights Law.” Human Rights Quarterly 37 (2015): 637.Google Scholar
Alexandrowicz, Charles Henry. “Some Problems in the History of the Law of Nations in Asia” [1963]. In The Law of Nations in Global History, Armitage, David and Pitts, Jennifer, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017: 76–82.Google Scholar
Alford, William. To Steal a Book Is an Elegant Offense: Intellectual Property Law in Chinese Civilization. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Alleton, Viviane. “The Migration of Grammars through Languages: The Chinese Case.” In Mapping Meanings: The Field of New Learning in Late Qing China, Vittinghoff, Natascha and Lackner, Michael, eds. Leiden: Brill, 2004: 223–224.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Alejandro. “Latin America and International Law.” American Journal of International Law 3, no. 2 (1909): 269–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Free-Trade League. Some Account of the American Free-Trade League and of Its Purposes. New York: American Free-Trade League, 1869.Google Scholar
An, Zuozhang, ed. Shandong Tongshi, vol. 8, part 2. Jinan: Shandong Renmin Chubanshe, 1994.Google Scholar
Anand, Dibyesh. “Strategic Hypocrisy: The British Imperial Scripting of Tibet’s Geopolitical Identity.” Journal of Asian Studies 68, no. 1 (2009): 227–252.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Anonymous, . “The Life and Work of the Late Dr. W. A. P. Martin.” The Chinese Recorder 48, no. 2 (1917): 116–123.Google Scholar
Association for the Reform and Codification of the Law of Nations. Report of the Sixth Annual Conference Held at Frankfort-on-the-Main, 20–23 August 1878. London: William Clowes and Sons, 1879.Google Scholar
Association for the Reform and Codification of the Law of Nations. Report of the Seventh Annual Conference Held at the Guildhall, London, 11–16 August 1879. London: William Clowes and Sons, 1880.Google Scholar
Attar, Mohsen al. “Subverting Eurocentric Epistemology: The Value of Nonsense When Designing Counterfactuals.” In Contingency in International Law: On the Possibility of Different Legal Histories, Venzke, Ingo and Heller, Kevin John, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021: 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baka, Anna Irene, and Fei, Qi. “Lost in Translation in the Sino-French War in Vietnam: From Western International Law to Confucian Semantics: A Comparative-Critical Analysis of the Chinese, French, and American Archives.” In Morality and Responsibility of Rulers: European and Chinese Origins of a Rule of Law as Justice for World Order, Carty, Anthony and Nijman, Janne, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018: 389–390.Google Scholar
Banquet to His Excellency Anson Burlingame and His Associates of the Chinese Embassy by the Citizens of New York, on Tuesday, June 23, 1868. New York: Sun Book and Job Printing House, 1868.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Ruy. “Rank among States Not Determined by Their Military Standing.” The Advocate of Peace 70, no. 36 (1908): 36–38.Google Scholar
Barclay, Thomas. Problems of International Practice and Diplomacy: With Special Reference to the Hague Conferences and Conventions and Other General International Agreements. London: Sweet & Maxwell Limited, 1907.Google Scholar
Barcia Trelles, Camilo. “Francisco de Vitoria et l’école moderne du droit international.” Recueil de Cours de L’Académie de Droit International 17 (1927): 109–342.Google Scholar
Bassin, Mark. Imperial Visions: Nationalist Imagination and Geographical Expansion in the Russian Far East, 1840–1865. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Bickers, Robert, and Tiedemann, R. Gary, eds. The Boxers, China, and the World. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar
Bin, Cheng. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. London: Stevens & Sons Ltd., 1953.Google Scholar
Bin, Cheng. “United Nations Resolutions on Outer Space: ‘Instant’ International Customary Law?” Indian Journal of International Law 5 (1965): 23–48.Google Scholar
Bismarck, Otto von. Werke in Auswahl: Reichsgestaltung und europäische Friedenswahrung, 1877–1882. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1973.Google Scholar
Blaustein, Albert, ed. Fundamental Legal Documents of Communist China. South Hackensack, NJ: Fred B. Rothman & Co., 1962.Google Scholar
Bloch, Ernst. “Nonsynchronism and the Obligation to Its Dialectics,” trans Ritter, Mark. New German Critique 11 (1977) [original publication 1935]: 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. Alt-asiatische Gottes- und Weltideen in ihren Wirkungen auf das Gemeinleben der Menschen. Nördlingen: C. H. Beck, 1866.Google Scholar
Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. Das moderne Völkerrecht der civilisirten Staten: als Rechtsbuch dargestellt, 1st ed. Nördlingen: C. H. Beck, 1872.Google Scholar
Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. Das moderne Völkerrecht der civilisirten Staten: als Rechtsbuch dargestellt, 2nd ed. Nördlingen: C. H. Beck, 1878.Google Scholar
Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. “Arische Völker und arische Rechte.” In Gesammelte kleine Schriften, vol. 1. Nördlingen: C. H. Beck, 1879.Google Scholar
Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. Gongfa Huitong, trans. Martin, W. A. P.. Beijing: Tongwenguan, 1880.Google Scholar
Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. Denkwürdiges aus meinem Leben, vol. 3 (1861–1881). Nördlingen: C. H. Beck, 1884.Google Scholar
Boecking, Felix. “Tariffs, Powers, Nationalism, and Modernity: Fiscal Policy in Guomindang-Controlled China, 1927–1945.” PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge, 2008.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M. “‘Responsibility of States’ at the Hague Codification Conference.” American Journal of International Law 24, no. 3 (1930): 517–540.Google Scholar
Borgwardt, Elizabeth. A New Deal for the World: America’s Vision for Human Rights. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Brière, Yves de la. “Évolution de la doctrine et de la pratique en matière de représailles.” Recueil de Cours de L’Académie de Droit International 22 (1928): 237–294.Google Scholar
Brockman-Hawe, Benjamin E. “Accountability for Crimes against the Laws of Humanity in Boxer China: An Experiment with International Justice at Paoting-Fu.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 38 (2016): 627–713.Google Scholar
Cain, Peter J. “Character and Imperialism: The British Financial Administration of Egypt, 1878–1914.” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 34, no. 2 (2006): 177–200.Google Scholar
Carrai, Maria Adele. Sovereignty in China: A Genealogy of a Concept since 1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassel, Pär Kristoffer. Grounds of Judgment: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Power in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Chaisse, Julien, and Matsushita, Mitsuo. “China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative: Mapping the World Trade Normative and Strategic Implications.” Journal of World Trade 52, no. 1 (2018): 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Claire Shu-Chin. When Confucius Meets Benedictus: The Destiny of a Chinese Politician Lou Tseng-tsiang (1871–1949). Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 1994.Google Scholar
Chen, Kaike. “Qiying Yu Di Er Ci Yapian Zhanzheng Zhong De Zhong E Jiaoshe.” Jindaishi Yanjiu 4 (2009): 60–76.Google Scholar
Chen, Kewei. “Bao Yingshi yu 1871 Nian de Zhong-Ri Tianjin Tiaoyue.” Qinghua Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban) 6 (2010): 70–78.Google Scholar
Chen, Li. Chinese Law in Imperial Eyes: Sovereignty, Justice, and Transcultural Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Chen, Li. “Professor James Leslie Brierly and His First Chinese Pupil Li Shengwu at Oxford University Faculty of Law (1927–1930).” Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire du droit international 20, no. 3 (2018): 373–380.Google Scholar
Chen, Li. “Tracing Chinese Scholar Chen Tiqiang’s Pursuit of International Law Education and His Major Contribution to the Doctrine of Recognition.” Asian Journal of International Law 10, no. 1 (2020): 68–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ti-Chiang, The International Law of Recognition, Green, Leslie Claude, ed. London: Stevens & Sons. 1951.Google Scholar
Chen, Tiqiang. “Wei Shenme Bixu Queding Qinlüe Dingyi?” Shijie Zhishi 2, no. 9 (1953): 9–10.Google Scholar
Chen, Tiqiang. “Guojifa Xiehui Di Sishiqi Jie Da Hui.” Faxue Yanjiu 3, no. 49 (1957): 5.Google Scholar
Chen, Yan. Kangri Zhanzheng Shiqi Zhongguo Waijiao Zhidu Yanjiu. Shanghai: Fudan Daxue Chubanshe, 2002.Google Scholar
Cheney, Amanda J. “Tibet Lost in Translation: Sovereignty, Suzerainty and International Order Transformation, 1904–1906.” Journal of Contemporary China 26, no. 107 (2017): 769–783.Google Scholar
Cheng, F. T. [Zheng Tianxi]. Rules of Private International Law Determining Capacity to Contract. London: Stevens, 1916.Google Scholar
Chiang, Hai Cháo [Jiang Haichao]. “La Chine.” In Bibliographie du Droit des Gens et des Rélations Internationales, Strupp, Karl, ed. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff, 1938: 261–267.Google Scholar
Chiang, Kai-shek. China’s Destiny and Chinese Economic Theory. Leiden: Global Oriental, 2012.Google Scholar
Chiu, Hungdah. “The Position of International Law in Chinese Law.” Annals of the Chinese Society of International Law 3 (1966): 88–97.Google Scholar
Clark, Martin. “Ambivalence, Anxieties/Adaptations, Advances: Conceptual History and International Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 31, no. 4 (2018): 747–771.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jerome Alan, and Chiu, Hungdah. People’s China and International Law: A Documentary Study. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Commission on Extraterritoriality in China. Report of the Commission on Extra-territoriality in China. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1926.Google Scholar
Cosmo, Nicola di. “Nurhaci’s Gambit: Sovereignty as Concept and Praxis in the Rise of the Manchus.” In The Scaffolding of Sovereignty: Global and Aesthetic Perspectives on the History of a Concept, Benite, Zvi Ben-Dor, Geroulanos, Stefanos, and Jerr, Nicole, eds. New York: Columbia University Press 2017: 102–123.Google Scholar
Covell, Ralph. W. A. P. Martin: Pioneer of Progress in China. Washington, DC: Christian University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Crane, George T. “Imagining the Economic Nation: Globalisation in China.” New Political Economy 4, no. 2 (1999): 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craven, Matthew. “Introduction: International Law and Its Histories.” In Time, History and International Law, Craven, Matthew, Malgosia, Fitzmaurice, and Vogiatzi, Maria, eds. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craven, Matthew. “Between Law and History: The Berlin Conference of 1884–1885 and the Logic of Free Trade.” London Review of International Law 3, no. 1 (2015): 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craven, Matthew. “Theorizing the Turn to History in International Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Orford, Anne and Hoffmann, Florian, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.Google Scholar
Da, Li Yuan. Chinese Supreme Court Decisions Relating to General Principles of Civil Law, Obligations, and Commercial Law. Peking: Commission of Extraterritoriality, 1923.Google Scholar
Davis, Hayne. “Legal Aspects of the Hague Conference.” American Lawyer 16, no. 1 (1908): 420–425.Google Scholar
Day, Jenny Huangfu. Qing Travelers to the Far West: Diplomacy and the Information Order in Late Imperial China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Dennett, Tyler. Americans in Eastern Asia: A Critical Study of the Policy of the United States with Reference to China, Japan and Korea in the 19th Century. New York: Macmillan, 1922.Google Scholar
Departement van Buitenlandsche Zaken. Deuxième Conférence Internationale de la Paix, Actes et Documents, Vol. 1, Séances Plénières de la Conférence. La Haye: Imprimerie Nationale, 1907.Google Scholar
Departement van Buitenlandsche Zaken. Deuxième Conférence Internationale de la Paix, Actes et Documents, Vol. 2, Première Commission. La Haye: Imprimerie Nationale, 1907.Google Scholar
Documents of United Nations Conference on International Organization San Francisco 1945, vol. 3. New York: United Nations Information Organizations, 1945.Google Scholar
Tseng-tsiang, Dom Pierre-Célestin Lou [Lu Zhengxiang]. Souvenirs et Pensées. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1946.Google Scholar
Duara, Prasenjit. Sovereignty and Authenticity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.Google Scholar
Dudden, Alexis. “Japan’s Engagement with International Terms.” In Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations, Liu, Lydia He, ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999: 165–191.Google Scholar
Dupuis, Jean. L’ouverture du Fleuve Rouge au Commerce et les Évènements du Tong-kin (1872–1873): Journal de Voyage et d’Expédition, vol. 2. Paris: Challamel Aîné, 1879.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, Robert. Transforming Empire in Japan and East Asia: The Taiwan Expedition and the Birth of Japanese Imperialism. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan: 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eslava, Luis, Fakhri, Michael, and Nesiah, Vasuki, eds. Bandung, Global History, and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Eyffinger, Arthur. The 1899 Hague Peace Conference: The Parliament of Man, the Federation of the World. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar
Eyffinger, Arthur. “A Highly Critical Moment: Role and Record of the 1907 Hague Peace Conference.” Netherlands International Law Review 54, no. 2 (2007): 197–228.Google Scholar
Eyffinger, Arthur. “Caught between Tradition and Modernity: East Asia at the Hague Peace Conferences.” Journal of East Asia and International Law 1 (2008): 7–46.Google Scholar
Fairbank, John King. “Synarchy under the Treaties.” In Chinese Thought and Institutions, Fairbank, John King, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957: 204–234.Google Scholar
Fairbank, John King. ed. The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Fan, Xianzheng. “‘Guoti’ yu ‘Zhengti’ Zai Jindai Zhongguo de Yanbian yu Fenhua.” Xueshu Yanjiu 3 (2014): 40–45.Google Scholar
Fang, Ke. Tiexue Gonghe: Tu Shuo Xinhai Geming. Beijing: Renmin Wenxue Chubanshe, 2011.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Charles G. International Law, 3rd ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1952.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Charles G. “Review: Le Développement et la Codification du Droit International. By Yuen-li Liang. Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1949. 126.” American Journal of International Law 44, no. 4 (1950): 786–787.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Charles G. “Draft Code of Offenses against the Peace and Security of Mankind.’ American Journal of International Law 46, no. 1 (1952): 98–100.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Charles G., and Willoughby, Westel W.. Types of Restricted Sovereignty and of Colonial Autonomy. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1919: 99–112.Google Scholar
Field, David Dudley. “De la Possibilité d’Appliquer le Droit International Européen aux Nations Orientales.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 7 (1875): 659–668.Google Scholar
Field, Henry M. The Life of David Dudley Field. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1898.Google Scholar
Finch, Geo A. “The Peace Conference of Paris, 1919.” American Journal of International Law 13, no. 2 (1919): 159–186.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Jurkovich, Michelle. “Getting a Seat at the Table: The Origins of Universal Participation and Modern Multilateral Conferences.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 20, no. 3 (2014): 361–373.Google Scholar
Flynn, Dennis O., and Giráldez, Arturo. “Cycles of Silver: Global Economic Unity through the Mid-Eighteenth Century.” Journal of World History 13, no. 2 (2002): 391–427.Google Scholar
Flynn, Dennis O., and Giráldez, Arturo. China and the Birth of Globalization in the 16th Century. Farnham: Ashgate Variorum, 2010.Google Scholar
Foster, John Watson. “Results of the Bering Sea Arbitration.” The North American Review 161, no. 469 (1895): 693–702.Google Scholar
Foster, John Watson. Diplomatic Memoirs, vol. 2. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1909.Google Scholar
Foulke, William Dudley. “Arbitration the Shortest Road to International Justice.” In Report of the Annual Lake Mohonk Conference on International Arbitration. New York: Lake Mohonk Conference on International Arbitration, 1911: 99–100.Google Scholar
Fry, Agnes. A Memoir of the Right Honourable Sir Edward Fry, G. C. B. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1921.Google Scholar
Fu, Limin and He, Minglun. Zhongguo Shangye Wenhua Da Cidian. Beijing: Zhongguo Fazhan Chubanshe, 1994.Google Scholar
Fuches, Walter. “Der Russisch–Chinesische Vertrag Von Nertschinsk Vom Jahre 1689: Eine Textkrische Betrachtung.” Monumenta Serica 4, no. 2 (1940): 546–593.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Eckhardt, Kasahara, Tokushi, and Saaler, Sven, eds. A New Modern History of East Asia. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2018.Google Scholar
Fung, Courtney J. China and Intervention at the UN Security Council: Reconciling Status. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Gao, Quanxi, Zhang, Wei, and Tian, Feilong. Xiandai Zhongguo Zou Xiang Fazhi zhi Lu. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press China, 2012.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. Negara: The Theatre-State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Geffcken, Heinrich. “La France en Chine et le Droit International.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 17 (1885):145–151.Google Scholar
Getachew, Adom. Worldmaking after Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-determination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. “The BRI, Non-interference, and Democracy.” Harvard International Law Journal 62, Special Issue (2021): 40–65.Google Scholar
Gobineau, Arthur. Essai sur l’inégalité des races humaines. Paris: Didot Frères, 1853.Google Scholar
Goetzmann, William N., Ukhov, Andrey D., and Zhu, Ning. “China and the World Financial Markets 1870–1939: Modern Lessons from Historical Globalization.” Economic History Review 60, no. 2 (2007): 267–312.Google Scholar
Gong, Gerrit W. The Standard of “Civilization” in International Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Gopa, Sarvepalli. Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Vol. 1: 1889–1947. Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Grant, John P., and Barker, J. Craig, eds. The Harvard Research in International Law: Original Materials. Vol. 1. New York: William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 2007.Google Scholar
Grewe, Wilhelm G. Epochen der Völkerrechtsgeschichte. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1984.Google Scholar
Guo, Songtao. Shixi Jicheng: Guo Songtao Ji 使西纪程: 郭嵩焘集 [Record of a Mission to the West: Collected Writings of Guo Songtao]. Shenyang: Liaoning Renmin Chubanshe, 1994.Google Scholar
Gützlaff, Karl Friedrich August. China Opened. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Halsey, Stephen R. Quest for Power: European Imperialism and the Making of Chinese Statecraft. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Halsey, Stephen R. “Sovereignty, Self-strengthening, and Steamships in Late Imperial China.” Journal of Asian History 48, no. 1 (2014): 81–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chengdong, and Baocun, Pan, eds. Guojifa Jiaocheng. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Han, Depei. “Ping Kai’erxun ‘Fa he Guojia de Yiban Lilun.’” In Han Depei Wenxuan, Jin, Huang, ed. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 1996: 602–606.Google Scholar
Han, Depei. “Ping ‘Taiwan Zijue’ Lun.” In Han Depei Wenxuan, Jin, Huang, ed. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 1996: 610–613.Google Scholar
Han, Depei and Zhu, Xingqian. “Wei Le Shijie Heping, Women Yao Gei Su-Mei Liang Guo Jian Zuo Yi Ge Meipo, Shi Qi Chong Hao.” Chang Qing Zhou Bao 13, nos. 2–3 (1948): 2–3.Google Scholar
Han, Tie. Feng Yu Ban Jiming: Wo de Fu Qin Han Depei Zhuan Ji. Beijing: Zhongguo Fangzheng Chubanshe, 2000.Google Scholar
Hanes, W. Travis, and Sanello, Frank. The Opium Wars: The Addiction of One Empire and the Corruption of Another. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks Inc., 2002.Google Scholar
Harris, Henry Wilson. Geneva, 1921: An Account of the Second Assembly of the League of Nations. London: Daily News Ltd., 1921.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. The Condition of Modernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A., and Shapiro, Scott J.. “Outcasting: Enforcement in Domestic and International Law.” Yale Law Journal 121, no. 2 (2011): 252–349.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A., and Shapiro, Scott J.. The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2017.Google Scholar
Hauer, Erich. “Why the Sinologue Should Study Manchu.” Bulletin of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 61 (1930): 156–164.Google Scholar
Haushofer, Karl. “Gesamtasiatische Fragen.” In Wörterbuch des Völkerrechts und der Diplomatie, vol. 1, Strupp, Karl, ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1924: 390–394.Google Scholar
He, Qinhua. “Wanguo Gongfa’ yu Qingmo Guojifa.” Faxue Yanjiu 23, no. 5 (2001): 137–148.Google Scholar
Heffter, August Wilhelm. Le Droit International Public de l’Europe. Paris: Cotillon, 1857.Google Scholar
Heffter, August Wilhelm, and Geffcken, Friedrich Heinrich, eds. Das europäische Volkerrecht der Gegenwart. Berlin: Schroeder, 1873.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Florian. Das Standardwerk: Franz von Liszt und das Völkerrecht. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001.Google Scholar
Hevia, James L. Cherishing Men from Afar: Qing Guest Ritual and the Macartney Embassy of 1793. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hevia, James L. English Lessons: The Pedagogy of Imperialism in Nineteenth-Century China. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Hicks, Frederick Charles. “The Equality of States and the Hague Conferences.” American Journal of International Law 2, no. 3 (1908): 530–561.Google Scholar
Hilderbrand, Robert C. Dumbarton Oaks: The Origins of the United Nations and the Search for Postwar Security. Durham: University of North Carolina Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hille, Willy van. “Étude sur la Responsabilité Internationale de l’État.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 56, no. 4 (1929): 531–571.Google Scholar
Hirohiko, Otsuka. “Japan’s Early Encounter with the Concept of the ‘Law of Nations.’” Japanese Annual of International Law 13, no. 35 (1969): 35–65.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Julius. “Current Notes on International Law.” Law Magazine and Review: A Quarterly Review of Jurisprudence 5, no. 26 (1900): 335.Google Scholar
Holls, Frederick W. The Peace Conference at the Hague and Its Bearings on International Law and Policy. London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd., 1900.Google Scholar
Holls, Frederick W. “The International Court of Arbitration at the Hague.” American Lawyer 9 (1901): 160.Google Scholar
Hong, Xiaoxia. “Chuxi Jiujinshan Lianheguo Zhixian Huiyi de Zhongguo Daibiaotuan Zucheng Qingkuang Shulüe.” Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Renwen Kexue Ban) 55, no. 3 (2002): 313–319.Google Scholar
Hornung, Joseph. “Note a Propos de l’Application aux Nations Orientales du Droit des Gens Coutumier de l’Europe.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 11 (1879): 447–449.Google Scholar
Hsü, Immanuel C. Y. China’s Entrance into the Family of Nations: The Diplomatic Phase, 1858–1880. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hsü, Immanuel C. Y. The Ili Crisis: A Study of Sino-Russian Diplomacy 1871–1881. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Hu, Shih. “Speech at Wellesley College, 15 June 1942.” Contemporary China 2, no. 3 (1942): 3–4.Google Scholar
Huber, Max. “Die Gleichheit der Staaten.” In Rechtswissenschaftliche Beiträge: Juristische Festgabe des Auslandes zu Josef Kohlers 60. Geburtstag, 9. März 1909. Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1909: 88–118.Google Scholar
Huber, Max. “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der soziologischen Grundlagen des Völkerrechts und der Staatengesellschaft.” In Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart, vol. 4. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1910: 56–134.Google Scholar
Hudson, Manley O. “The Progressive Codification of International Law.” American Journal of International Law 20, no. 4 (1926): 655–669.Google Scholar
Huenemann, Ralph William. The Dragon and the Iron Horse: The Economics of Railroads in China, 1876–1937. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 1984.Google Scholar
Hughes, Charles E., Cabot Lodge, Henry, Underwood, Oscar W. and Root, Elihu, “Conference on the Limitation of Armament.” American Journal of International Law 16, no. 2 (1922): 159–233.Google Scholar
Hull, William I. “The United States and Latin America at the Hague.” International Conciliation 1, no. 44 (1911): 12–13.Google Scholar
Il Conferência da Paz Haia 1907: A correspondência telegráfica entre o Barão do Rio Branco e Rui Barbosa. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão, 2014.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International. Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, vols. 3–4, 1879–1880. Brussels: C. Muquardt, 1880.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International. Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, vol. 6, 1882–1883. Brussels: Merzbach et Falk, 1883.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International. Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, vol. 27, 1919. Brussels: Falk, 1919.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International. Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, vol. 28, 1921. Brussels: A. Dewit, 1921.Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International. Annuaire de l”institut de Droit International, vol. 33, 1927. Brussels: Goemare, 1927.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, Yoshihiro. The Formation of the Chinese Communist Party, trans. Joshua, Fogel. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Harold Karan, and Oksenberg, Michel. China’s Participation in the IMF, the World Bank, and GATT: Toward a Global Economic Order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Jeans, Roger B. Democracy and Socialism in Republican China: The Politics of Zhang Junmai (Carsun Chang), 1906–1941. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997.Google Scholar
Jellinek, Georg. “China und das Völkerrecht.” Deutsche Juristen-Zeitung 5, no. 19 (1900): 401–403.Google Scholar
Jin, Guantao, Qingfeng, Liu, and Weiyun, Qiu. “Zhongguo Xiandai Zhuquan Guannian Xingcheng de Shuwei Renwen Yanjiu.” Ershiyi Shiji Shuangyuekan 172 (2019): 49–67.Google Scholar
Johnson, David H. N. “The Draft Code of Offences against the Peace and Security of Mankind.” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 4, no. 3 (1955): 445–468.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. The Origins of Order: Project and System in the American Legal Imagination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Kasek, Elisabeth. Bismarcks Missionare: Deutsche Militärinstrukteure in China 1884–1890. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Alison Adcock. “In Pursuit of Equality and Respect: China’s Diplomacy and the League of Nations.” Modern China 40, no. 6 (2014): 605–638.Google Scholar
Kawashima, Shin. “China.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, Fassbender, Bardo, Peters, Anne, Peter, Simone, and Högger, Daniel, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012: 451–474.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts: Beitrag zu einer reinen Rechtslehre. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr/P. Siebeck, 1920.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems: With Supplement. Clark, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2000.Google Scholar
Kirby, William C. Germany and Republican China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Kirgis, Frederic L. The American Society of International Law’s First Century, 1906–2006. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Klein, Robert A. Sovereign Equality among States: The History of an Idea. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert. “Origin of the Twin Terms Jus ad Bellum/Jus in Bello.” International Review of the Red Cross Archive 37, no. 320 (1997): 553–562.Google Scholar
Koo, V. K. Wellington. The Status of Aliens in China. New York: Columbia University Press, 1912.Google Scholar
Koo, V. K. Wellington. “Bali hehui guoji lianhe guyiding mengyue qingxing zhaiyao.” Waijiao gongbao 1 (1921): 3–5.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. “Staat und Souveränität.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexicon zur Politisch-Sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, vol. 6. Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart, eds. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1972–1990: 1–54.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. “A History of International Law Histories.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, Fassbender, Bardo, Peters, Anne, Peter, Simone, and Högger, Daniel, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth: Legal Imagination and International Power 1300–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Krauel, A. “Applicabilite du Droit des Gens Européen a la Chine.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 9 (1877): 387–401.Google Scholar
Kraus, Herbert. The Crisis of German Democracy; A Study of the Spirit of the Constitution of Weimar. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1932.Google Scholar
Kroll, Stefan. Normgenese durch Re-interpretation: China und das europäische Völkerrecht im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2012.Google Scholar
Kuehl, Warren F. Seeking World Order: The United States and International Organization to 1920. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Arthur K. “The International Conference on the Treatment of Foreigners.” American Journal of International Law 24, no. 3 (1930): 570–573.Google Scholar
Kunz, Josef L. “The Chaotic Status of the Laws of War and the Urgent Necessity for Their Revision.” American Journal of International Law 45, no. 1 (1951): 37–61.Google Scholar
Kunz, Josef L. “Legality of the Security Council Resolutions of June 25 and 27, 1950.” American Journal of International Law 45, no. 1 (1951): 137–142.Google Scholar
Lai, Xinxia. Lin Zexu Nianpu Chang Pian, vol. 1. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiatong Daxue Chubanshe, 2011.Google Scholar
Lammasch, Heinrich. “Aus Meinem Leben.” In Heinrich Lammasch: Seine Aufzeichnungen, sein Wirken und seine Politik, Lammasch, Marga and Sperl, Hans, eds. Vienna: Franz Deuticke, 1922: 14–17.Google Scholar
Lapradelle, Albert Geouffre de, and Stowell, Ellery C.. “Latin America at the Hague Conference.” Yale Law Journal 17 (1907): 270–280.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch. Recognition in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [original publication 1947].Google Scholar
Lavelle, Peter B. The Profits of Nature: Colonial Development and the Quest for Resources in Nineteenth-Century China. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Thomas Joseph. International Problems and Hague Conferences. London: J. M. Dent, 1908.Google Scholar
Lee, Christopher J., ed. Making a World after Empire: The Bandung Moment and Its Political Afterlives. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel. “Sources of Sovereignty: Roman Imperium and Dominium in Civilian Theories of Sovereignty.” Politica Antica 2, no. 1 (2012): 79–94.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel. “‘Office Is a Thing Borrowed’: Jean Bodin on Offices and Seigneurial Government.” Political Theory 41, no. 3 (2013): 409–440.Google Scholar
Lee, Frederic. Currency, Banking, and Finance in China. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce, 1927.Google Scholar
Lee, Lai To and Lee, Hock Guan, eds. Sun Yat-Sen, Nanyang and the 1911 Revolution. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2011.Google Scholar
Leitner, Kerstin. When Only the Sky Is the Limit: Memoirs of a Nomadic International Civil Servant Working for Global Peace and Development, 1975–2005. Berlin: lulu.com, 2013.Google Scholar
Lepert, Henri. Projet de constitution pour la Société des nations: Projet soumis à la Ligue. Paris: Ligue por une Société des Nations Basée sur une Constitution Internationale, 1917.Google Scholar
Li, Bingnan, Zeng, Jianyuan, and Lin, Zixuan. “‘Dongyuan Kanluan Shiqi Linshi Tiaokuan’ zhi Zhidu Jingyan ji qi Yingxiang.” Taiwan Minzhu Jikan 1, no. 2 (2004): 95–129.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. The Bitter Sea: Coming of Age in a China before Mao. New York: Harper Collins, 2009.Google Scholar
Li, Dade. “Guanyu Zhou Gengsheng Hu Shi zhi de Lunzhan: Tongyi Zhou Gengsheng Kanfa, Hu Shi zhi You ‘Kong Su Bing.’” Zhongyang Zhoukan 10, no. 9 (1948): 355.Google Scholar
Li, Dong. “Yangwu Yundong Shiqqi Xue Fucheng Jiaru Guojifa Da Jiating de Zhuzhang yu Shijian.” Zhengfa Xuekan 37, no. 2 (2020): 121–128.Google Scholar
Li, Enhan. Beifa Qianhou de “Geming Waijiao” 1925–1931. Taipei: Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan Jindai Shi Yanjiusuo, 1993.Google Scholar
Li, Fupeng. “Weima Xianfa Shehuiquan de Zhongguo Zhuanhua.” Huanqiu Falü Pinglun 42, no. 3 (2020): 133–146.Google Scholar
Li, Guanghe. “Yapian Zhanzheng Qianhou Qiying Dui Wai Jiaoshe Lunshu.” Huabei Meishiyuan Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban) 2 (1999): 3–5.Google Scholar
Li, Guilian. 1902: Zhongguo Fa de Zhuanxing. Guilin: Guangxi Shifan Daxue Chubanshe, 2018.Google Scholar
Li, Hongxi. Zhang Junmai Xiansheng de Minzhu Xianfa Sixiang. Taipei: Jinian Zhang Junmai Xiansheng Bai Ling Ming Dan Xueshu Yantaohui [Forum to Celebrate the Centennial of Zhang Junmai’s Birth], 1986.Google Scholar
Li, Xizhu. “Li Hongzhang Dui Riben de Renshi ji Qi Waijiao Celüe: Yi 1870 Niandai wei Zhongxin.” Jindai Zhongguo Zhengzhi yu Waijiao 1, no. 204 (2013): 145–159.Google Scholar
Li, Yu-qin. “Analysis of the Establishment and Operation of Hanyeping Company’s Joint Stock System in the Late Qing Dynasty.” Journal of XuChang University 4 (2009): 101–105.Google Scholar
Liang, Jian. “Yang Ru Jiejue Meiguo Paihua Wenti de Shijian yu Gouxiang Shulun.” Xinan Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) 12, no. 2 (2011): 82–86.Google Scholar
Liang, Yuen-li. “The Pact of Paris as Envisaged by Mr. Stimson: Its Significance in International Law.” China Law Review 5 (1932): 198–227.Google Scholar
Liang, Yuen-li. “Le développement et la codification du droit international.” Recueil des Cours 73 (1948): 407–532.Google Scholar
Liang, Yuen-li. “The General Assembly and the Progressive Development and Codification of International Law.” American Journal of International Law 42, no. 1 (1948): 66–97.Google Scholar
Liang, Yuen-li. “Notes on Legal Questions Concerning the United Nations.” American Journal of International Law 43, no. 1 (1949): 134–144.Google Scholar
Liang, Yuen-li. “The Establishment of an International Criminal Jurisdiction: The First Phase.” American Journal of International Law 46, no. 1 (1952): 73–88.Google Scholar
Liang, Yuen-li, and Wang, Feiya “Li Shengwu Zhu Guoji Gongfa Lun.” Tushu Pinglun 2, no. 9 (1934): 35–43.Google Scholar
Lieber, Francis. Fragments of Political Science on Nationalism and Internationalism. New York: Charles Scribner & Co., 1868.Google Scholar
Lieber, Francis. Notes on Fallacies Peculiar to American Protectionists, or Chiefly Resorted to in America. New York: American Free-Trade League, 1869.Google Scholar
Ling, Qing. Cong Yan’an Dao Lianheguo: Ling Qing de Waijiao Shengya. Fujian: Fujian Renmin Chubanshe, 2008.Google Scholar
Liszt, Franz von. Das Völkerrecht systematisch dargestellt, 1st ed. Berlin: O. Haering, 1888.Google Scholar
Liszt, Franz von. Das Völkerrecht systematisch dargestellt, 2nd ed. Berlin: Verlag O. Haering, 1902.Google Scholar
Liszt, Franz von. Das Wesen des völkerrechtlichen Staatenverbandes und der international Prisenhof. Breslau: M. & H. Marcus, 1910.Google Scholar
Liszt, Franz von. Das Völkerrecht Systematisch Dargestellt. 10th ed. Berlin: Springer, 1915.Google Scholar
Liu, Andrew B. Tea War: A History of Capitalism in China and India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Liu, Dan. “1874 Nian Dajiu Baolitong Beijing Tanpan de Dongyin yu Yingxiang.” Waiguo Wenti Yanjiu 4, no. 9 (2018): 85–92.Google Scholar
Liu, Dasheng. “Shangfang Shi Gongmin de Xianfa Quanli.” Hongqi Wengao 2 (2004): 29–30.Google Scholar
Liu, Gengsheng. “Yixin yu Zongli Yamen de Jianli Shuping.” Lishi Dangan 3 (1990): 93–98.Google Scholar
Liu, Guoming, ed., Zhonghua Minguo Guomin Zhengfu Jun Zheng Zhiguan Renwu Zhi. Beijing: Chunqiu Chubanshe, 1989.Google Scholar
Liu, Lydia He. “Legislating the Universal: The Circulation of International Law in the Nineteenth Century.” In Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations, ed. Liu, Lydia He. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Liu, Yi. “Lun Zongli Yamen de Jianli Ji Qi Lishi Diwei.” Suzhou Daxue Xuebao 3 (1991): 112–120.Google Scholar
Lin, Laifan. “Guoti Gainianshi: Kuaguo Yizhi yu Yanbian.” Zhongguo Shehui Kexue 3 (2013): 65–84.Google Scholar
Ling, Qing. Cong yan’an dao lianheguo: Ling Qing de waijiao shengya. Fujian: Fujian Renmin Chubanshe, 2008.Google Scholar
Lingen, Kerstin von. Transcultural Justice at the Tokyo Tribunal: The Allied Struggle for Justice, 1946–48. Leiden: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar
Long, Xiaofei. “Qiying Waijiao Lilun Chu Tan.” Shoudu Bowuguan Congkan 0 (1995): 30–36.Google Scholar
Lorca, Arnulf Becker. Mestizo International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Lorimer, James. “Prolegomènes d’un Système Raisonné de Droit International.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 10 (1878): 348.Google Scholar
Lorimer, James. The Institutes of the Law of Nations, vol 1. Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons, 1883.Google Scholar
Lou, Dom Pierre-Célestin Tseng-tsiang [Lu Zhengxiang]. Souvenirs et Pensées. Bruges: Desclée de Brouwer, 1946.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. Foundations of Modern Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Lutz, Jessie Gregory. Opening China: Karl F. A. Gützlaff and Sino-Western Relations, 1827–1852. Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar
Ma, Do Yün [Ma Derun]. “Der Eintritt des chinesischen Reiches in den völkerrechtlichen Verband.” PhD dissertation, University of Berlin, 1907.Google Scholar
Ma, Yong. “From Constitutional Monarchy to Republic: The Trajectory of Yuan Shikai.” Journal of Modern Chinese History 6, no. 1 (2012): 15–32.Google Scholar
Ma, Ziyi. “Cong ‘Tianxia’ Dao ‘Zhuquan’: Cong Tiaoyue, Chuanjiao Kan Qingmo Shehui Guannian de Bianhua.” Shilin 6 (2004): 15–22.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Ronald St. John, ed. Essays in Honour of Wang Tieya. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
Mahan, Alfred Thayer. The Influence of Sea Power upon History: 1660–1783. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co., 1890.Google Scholar
Mahan, Alfred Thayer. The Problem of Asia and Its Effect upon International Policies. London: Sampson, Low, Marston and Co., 1900.Google Scholar
Mamolea, Andrei. “Saving Face: The Political Work of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (1902–1914).” In Experiments in International Adjudication: Historical Accounts, de la Rasilla, Ignacio and Viñuales, Jorge E., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019: 193–210.Google Scholar
Marburg, Theodore. “The Significance of the International Court of Arbitral Justice.” In Report of the Annual Lake Mohonk Conference on International Arbitration. New York: Lake Mohonk Conference on International Arbitration, 1910: 85–89.Google Scholar
Martens, Fyodor de. Das Consularwesen und die Consularjurisdiction im Orient, trans. Skerzt, H.. Berlin: Weidmann, 1874.Google Scholar
Martens, Fyodor de. Le Conflit entre la Russie et la Chine, ses Origines, son Développement, et sa Portée Universelle: Étude Politique. Brussels: C. Muquardt, 1880.Google Scholar
Martens, Fyodor de. “How the Chinese Question Should Be Solved.” The Advocate of Peace 62, no. 11 (1900): 240–241Google Scholar
Martens, Fyodor de. La Conférence de la Paix á La Haye: Étude d’Histoire Contemporaine. Paris: Arthur Rousseau, 1900.Google Scholar
Martens, Georg Friedrich von. Précis du droit des gens moderne de l’Europe, vol. 1. Paris: Guillaumin et Cie, 1864.Google Scholar
Martin, William Alexander Parsons. A Cycle of Cathay: Or, China, South and North, with Personal Reminiscences. New York: Fleming H. Revell, 1896.Google Scholar
Martin, William Alexander Parsons. “La Chine et la Droit International.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 17 (1885): 504–509.Google Scholar
Martin, William Alexander Parsons. “Les Vestiges d’un Droit International dans l’Ancienne Chine.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 14 (1882): 227–242.Google Scholar
Martin, William Alexander Parsons. The Siege in Peking: China against the World. New York: Fleming H. Revell, 1900.Google Scholar
Martin, William Alexander Parsons. “Une Université en Chine: Le Présent et l’Avenir de l’Ensiegnement Supérieur International a Peking.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 5 (1873): 8–10.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. New York: Penguin Books in association with the New Left Review, 1973.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich H. G.. Karl Marx Friedrich Engels Gesamtausgabe (MEGA), Part 3, Briefwechsel, vol. 9, Januar 1858 bis August 1859. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich H. G.. On Colonialism: Articles from the New York Tribune and Other Writings. New York: International Publishers, 1972.Google Scholar
Maxey, Edwin. “Development of International Law.” American Law Review 40, no. 188 (1906): 188–195.Google Scholar
Mayers, William Frederick. Treaties between the Empire of China and Foreign Powers, Together with Regulations for the Conduct of Foreign Trade, Conventions, Agreements, Regulations, etc. Shanghai: North China Herald Ltd., 1906.Google Scholar
Mayr, Teresa F., and Mayr-Singer, Jelka. “Keep the Wheels Spinning: The Contributions of Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice to the Development of International Law.” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 76, no. 2 (2016): 425–449.Google Scholar
McCabe, James Dabney. A Tour around the World by General Grant: Being a Narrative of the Incidents and Events of His Journey. Philadelphia: The National Publishing Co., 1879.Google Scholar
McDougal, S. Myres. “International Law, Power, and Policy: A Contemporary Conception.” Recueil des Cours 82 (1954): 133–259.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 1964.Google Scholar
McWilliams, Wayne C. “Soejima Taneomi: Statesman of Early Meiji Japan, 1868–1874.” PhD dissertation, University of Kansas, 1973.Google Scholar
McWilliams, Wayne C. “East Meets East: The Soejima Mission to China, 1873.” Monumenta Nipponica 30, no. 3 (1975): 237–275.Google Scholar
Mei, Ju-ao. The Tokyo Trial and War Crimes in Asia, 2nd ed. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2016.Google Scholar
Meng, Guanghan, ed. Zhengzhi Xieshang Huiyi Jilu, Shang Juan. Chongqing: Chongqing Chubanshe, 1989.Google Scholar
Merlin, Philippe-Antoine. Répertoire universel et raisonné de jurisprudence, vol. 17. Paris: Garnery, 1827–1828.Google Scholar
Millard, Thomas F. The Shantung Case at the Conference. Shanghai: Millard’s Review of the Far East, 1921.Google Scholar
Miller, David Hunter. The Drafting of the Covenant. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation, 1969.Google Scholar
Ministère des Affaires Étrangères. Documents Diplomatiques: Affaires du Tonkin. Deuxième Partie. Décembre 1882–1883. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1883.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ryan Martínez. “International Law as Project or System?” Georgetown Journal of International Law 51, no. 3 (2019): 623–689.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ryan Martínez. “Chinese Receptions of Carl Schmitt since 1929.” Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs 8, no. 1 (2020): 181–245.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ryan Martínez. “Monroe’s Shadow: League of Nations Covenant Article 21 and the Space of Asia in International Legal Order.” TWAIL Review 2 (2021): 200–231.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ryan Martínez. “The Human Community of Fate: A Conceptual History of China’s Ordoglobal Idea.” Humanity 13, no. 3 (forthcoming 2022).Google Scholar
Mizuno, Norihito. “Qing China’s Reaction to the 1874 Japanese Expedition to the Taiwanese Aboriginal Territories.” Sino-Japanese Studies 16 (2009): 100–125.Google Scholar
Morikawa, Hiroki. “In Pursuit of Peace: Zhou Gengsheng’s Internationalism after the World Wars.” ZINBUN 47 (2017): 177–194.Google Scholar
Morse, Hosea Ballou. The International Relations of the Chinese Empire, vols. 1–3. London: Longmans, Green, and Company, 1918.Google Scholar
Mowat, Robert Case. “From Liberalism to Imperialism: The case of Egypt 1875–1887.” The Historical Journal 16, no. 1 (1973): 109–124.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. “From Situated Freedom to Plausible Worlds.” In Contingency in International Law: On the Possibility of Different Legal Histories, Venzke, Ingo and Heller, Kevin John, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021: 532–541.Google Scholar
Müller, Andreas T. “Friedrich F. Martens on ‘The Office of Consul and Consular Jurisdiction in the East.’” European Journal of International Law 25, no. 3 (2014): 871–891.Google Scholar
Nagao, Ariga. The Red Cross Society of Japan: Its Organization and Activity in Time of Peace and War. St. Louis, MO: Samuel F. Myerson Printing Company, 1904.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. “Zhang Junmai’s Early Political Philosophy and the Paradoxes of Chinese Modernity.” Asian Studies 8, no. 1 (2020): 183–208.Google Scholar
Nippold, Otfried. Die Gestaltung des Völkerrechts nach dem Weltkriege. Zurich: Orell Füssli, 1917.Google Scholar
Nish, Ian. The Iwakura Mission to America and Europe: A New Assessment. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Arthur. “Frederic de Martens, Representative Tsarist Writer on International Law.” Nordic Journal of International Law 22, no. 1 (1952): 51–66.Google Scholar
Shigemi, Ōhara to Tomomi, Iwakura, January 12, 1873. In Iwakura Tomomi kankei monjo, vol. 5. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai, 1968: 216–220.Google Scholar
Onuma, Yasuaki. “When Was the Law of International Society Born?: An Inquiry of the History of International Law from an Intercivilizational Perspective.” Journal of the History of International Law 2, no. 1 (2000): 1–66.Google Scholar
Onuma, Yasuaki. A Transcivilizational Perspective on International Law: Questioning Prevalent Cognitive Frameworks in the Emerging Multi-polar and Multi-civilizational World of the Twenty-First Century. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa. International Law: A Treatise, vol. 1. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1905.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa. International Law: A Treatise, 3rd ed. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1920.Google Scholar
Özsu, Umut. “Ottoman Empire.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, Fassbender, Bardo, Peters, Anne, Peter, Simone, and Högger, Daniel, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012: 429–446.Google Scholar
Özsu, Umut. “The Ottoman Empire, the Origins of Extraterritoriality, and International Legal Theory.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Orford, Anne and Hoffmann, Florian, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016: 123–137.Google Scholar
Özsu, Umut. “The Necessity of Contingency: Method and Marxism in International Law.” In Contingency in International Law: On the Possibility of Different Legal Histories, Venzke, Ingo and Heller, Kevin John, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021: 60–76.Google Scholar
Paine, Sarah C. The Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895: Perceptions, Power, and Primacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Patapan, Haig, and Wang, Yi. “The Hidden Ruler: Wang Huning and the Making of Contemporary China.” Journal of Contemporary China 27, no. 109 (2018): 47–60.Google Scholar
Peng, Jianying. “Zhongguo Chuantong Jimi Zhengce Lüelun.” Xibe Daxue Xuebao: Zhexue (Shehui Kexue Ban) 34, no. 1 (2004): 104–108.Google Scholar
Pepper, Suzanne. Civil War in China: The Political Struggle 1945–1949. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Perdue, Peter C. China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Phillimore, Walter. “Appendix: Recent Schemes of Federation.” In The Committee of the League of Nations, Final Report. Geneva: League of Nations: 1918: 8–24.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. Boundaries of the International: Law and Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Platt, Stephen R. Imperial Twilight: The Opium War and the End of China’s Last Golden Age. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2018.Google Scholar
Politis, Nicolas. Les Nouvelles Tendances du Droit International. Paris: Librairie Hachette, 1927.Google Scholar
Politis, Nicolas. Proceedings and Documents of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference, Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, July 1–22, 1944, 2 vols. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1948.Google Scholar
Politis, Nicolas. Qingdai Wai Zhai Shi Ziliao. Beijing: Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Caizheng Bu: 1988.Google Scholar
Rao, Geping. “Wang Tieya Xiansheng he Bei Da Guojifa Yanjiusuo.” Zhongguo Guojifa Xuehui, May 6, 2015. Available at: www.csil.cn/Director/Detail.aspx?AId=12.Google Scholar
Reimann, Mathias. “The Historical School against Codification: Savigny, Carter, and the Defeat of the New York Civil Code.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 37, no. 1 (1989): 95–119.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August. “Investors.” In Non-state Actors in International Law, Noortmann, Math, Reinisch, August, and Ryngaert, Cedric, eds. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015: 253–272.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Philip A., and Hughes, Edward J.. The Historian as Diplomat: Charles Kingsley Webster and the United Nations 1939–1946. London: Martin Robertson, 1976.Google Scholar
Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “Notes on Fallacies Peculiar to American Protectionists, or Chiefly Resorted to in America, by Francis Lieber.” Revue de Droit International et de Léglisation Comparée 2 (1870): 354–356.Google Scholar
Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “Proposition d’Établir un Collège Americain en Chine.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 4 (1872): 362–363.Google Scholar
Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “Rédaction d’un Code civile Japonais.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 4 (1872): 363.Google Scholar
Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “La Diplomatie Européenne à Péking.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 9 (1877): 401–404.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Theodore. “Annual Message of the President to Congress.” In Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, vol. 1. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1904: xlviii.Google Scholar
Root, Elihu. “Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad.” American Journal of International Law 4, no. 3 (1910): 517–528.Google Scholar
Röpke, Wilhelm. “Economic Order and International Law.” Receuil des Cours 86 (1954): 207–273.Google Scholar
Röpke, Wilhelm. International Order and Economic Integration. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1959.Google Scholar
Rosenne, Shabtai, ed. League of Nations Committee of Experts for the Progressive Codification of International Law (1925–1928): Documents Vol. 1. New York: Oceana Publications, 1972.Google Scholar
Roth, Hans Ingvar. P. C. Chang and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Schlichtmann, Klaus. “Japan, Germany and the Idea of the Hague Peace Conferences.” Journal of Peace Research 40. no. 4 (2003): 377–394.Google Scholar
Schluessel, Eric. Land of Strangers: The Civilizing Project in Qing Central Asia. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Der Nomos der Erde im Volkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1950.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. “Die Lage der europäischen Rechtswissenschaft” (1950). In Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924–1954. Materialen zu einer Verfassungslehre, Schmitt, Carl, ed. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1958: 386–429.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, trans. Ulmen, G. L.. New York: Telos Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Schücking, Walther. “L’organisation international.” Revue générale de droit international public 15 (1908): 5–23.Google Scholar
Schücking, Walther. Das Werk vom Haag, Erster Band: Die Staatenverband der Haager Konferenzen. Munich: Duncker & Humblot, 1912.Google Scholar
Schücking, Walther. “Die frage der Kündigung des belgisch-Chinesischen handelsverträges von 1865.” In Die Reichsgerichtspraxis im Deutschen Rechtsleben: Festgabe der juristischen Fakultäten zum 50jährigen Bestehen des Reichsgerichts, vol. 1, Öffentliches Recht, Schreiber, Otto, ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1929.Google Scholar
Schuler, Kurt, and Rosenberg, Andrew, eds. The Bretton Woods Transcripts. New York: Center for Financial Stability, 2012.Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown. The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907, vol. 1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1909.Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown. The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907, vol. 2. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1909.Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown. “The Chinese Society and Journal of International Law.” American Journal of International Law 7, no. 1 (1913): 159–161.Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown. ed. American Addresses at the Second Hague Peace Conference. Boston: World Peace Foundation, 1916.Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown. “The Chinese Social and Political Science Association.” American Journal of International Law 10, no. 2 (1916): 375–378.Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown. The Reports to the Hague Conferences of 1899 and 1907. New York: Clarendon Press, 1917.Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown. The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences: Translation of the Original Texts. New York: Oxford University Press, 1920.Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown. ed. The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences, The Conference of 1907, Vol. 2, Meetings of the First Commission. New York: Oxford University Press, 1921.Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown. ed., The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences, The Conference of 1907, vol. 3, Meetings of the Second, Third, and Fourth Commissions. New York: Oxford University Press, 1921.Google Scholar
Sebes, Joseph. The Jesuits and the Sino-Russian Treaty of Nerchinsk (1689): The Diary of Thomas Pereira, S. J. Rome: Institutum Historicum, 1962.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, and Gao, Henry, “A New Chinese Economic Order?” Journal of International Economic Law 23, no. 3 (2020): 607–635.Google Scholar
Shen, Minrong. “Zhengfu, Shichang yu Jingjifa de Dingwei.” PhD dissertation, Central Party School of the Chinese Communist Party, 2000.Google Scholar
Shibata, M., and Koyas, T., eds. An English and Japanese Dictionary. Yokohama: Ni-Shu-Sha Printing Office, 1873.Google Scholar
Shotwell, James T. Extraterritoriality in China. New York: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1929.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Singh Chimni, Bhupinder. International Law and World Order: A Critique of Contemporary Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8, no. 1 (1969): 3–53.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, Tully, James, ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988: 29–67.Google Scholar
Skouteris, Thomas. “Engaging History in International Law.” In New Approaches to International Law, Beneyto, José María and Kennedy, David, eds. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2012: 99–121.Google Scholar
Slobodian, Quinn. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, vol. 1. London: Printed for W. Strahan; and T. Cadell in the Strand, 1776.Google Scholar
Speranskii, Mikhail M. Polnoe Sobranie: Zakonov Rossiiskoi Imperii s 1649 Goda, Vol. 3, 1689–1699. St. Petersburg: Tipografiya Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva Kantselyarii, 1830.Google Scholar
Spiermann, Ole. International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice: The Rise of the International Judiciary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Spiermann, Ole. “Judge Wang Chung-hui at the Permanent Court of International Justice.” Chinese Journal of International Law 5, no. 1 (2006): 115–128.Google Scholar
Stead, William T. The Parliament of Peace and Its Members. London: Review of Reviews, 1899.Google Scholar
Stead, William T. The United States of Europe on the Eve of the Parliament of Peace. Toronto: George N. Morang, 1899.Google Scholar
Steiger, Heinhard. “Völkerrecht.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, vol. 7, Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart, eds. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1972–1990: 97–140.Google Scholar
Stranahan, Patricia. Underground: The Shanghai Communist Party and the Politics of Survival, 1927–1937. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.Google Scholar
Strauss, Julia C. Strong Institutions in Weak Polities: State Building in Republican China, 1927–1940. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Strupp, Karl. Urkunden zur geschichte des völkerrechts. Gotha: Friedrich Andreas Perthes, 1911.Google Scholar
Strupp, Karl. Ausgewählte diplomatische Aktenstücke zur orientalischen Frage. Gotha: Friedrich Andreas Perthes, 1916.Google Scholar
Strupp, Karl. Documents pour servir à l’histoire du droit des gens. Berlin: Hermann Sack, 1923.Google Scholar
Strupp, Karl. Legal Machinery for Peaceful Change. London: Constable & Company Limited, 1937.Google Scholar
Sun, Yat-sen. China and Japan: Natural Friends, Unnatural Enemies. Shanghai: China United Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Suttner, Bertha von. “Slow Evolution.” The Advocate of Peace 62, no. 10 (1900): 208–209.Google Scholar
Suttner, Bertha von. Memoiren von Bertha von Suttner. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1909.Google Scholar
Suttner, Bertha von. Memoirs of Bertha von Suttner: The Records of an Eventful Life, vol. 2. London: International School of Peace, 1910.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo. “Imagining ‘Asia’: Japan and ‘Asian’ International Society in Modern History.” In Contesting International Society in East Asia, Buzan, Barry and Zhang, Yongjin, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014: 51–72.Google Scholar
Svarverud, Rune. International Law as a World Order in Late Imperial China: Translation, Reception and Discourse; 1847–1911. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Taft, William H. Address of President Taft at the Banquet Given in His Honor by the Americus Club, Pittsburgh, P.A., May 2, 1910. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1910.Google Scholar
Takeharu, Ōkubo. The Quest for Civilization: Encounters with Dutch Jurisprudence, Political Economy, and Statistics at the Dawn of Modern Japan, trans. Noble, David. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Tang, Qihua. “Qingmo Minchu Zhongguo dui ‘Haiya Baohehui’ zhi Canyu (1899–1917).” Guoli Zhengzhi Daxue Lishi Xuebao 5, no. 23 (2005): 45–49.Google Scholar
Tang, Qihua. Bei “Feichu Bupindeng Tiaoyue” Zhebi de Beiyang Xiuyue Shi (1912–1928). Beijing: Shehui Keshue Wenxian Chubanshe, 2010.Google Scholar
Tchéou-Wei, Sintchar [Zhou Wei]. Essai sur l’organisation juridique de la Société international. Geneva: Libraire Atar, 1917.Google Scholar
The International Law Association. Reports of the First Conference Held at Brussels, 1873, and of the Second Conference Held at Geneva, 1874. London: West, Newman & Co., 1903.Google Scholar
Thompson, Carol L. “A History of Disarmament Proposals.” Current History 36, no. 209 (1959): 38–43.Google Scholar
Tian, Tao. “Wan Qing Zhishijie de Mibing Shuo.” Tianjin Shifan Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) 1 (2008): 38–43.Google Scholar
Tian, Tao. “Haiya He Hui zai Zhongguo de Fanxiang.” Tianjin Shifan Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) 3 (2015): 11–16.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. “After Critical Legal History: Scope, Scale, Structure.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8, no. 1 (2012): 31–68.Google Scholar
Trubetskoi, G. N. Notes of a Plenipotentiary: Russian Diplomacy and War in the Balkans, 1914–1917. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Tryon, James L. “International Prize Court and Code.” Yale Law Journal 20 (1910): 604–619.Google Scholar
Tso, Tschun Tschou [Zhou Zechun]. Die Reformen des chinesischen Reiches in Verfassung, Verwaltung und Rechtsprechung mit Ruecksicht auf die entsprechenden Einrichtungen Europas. Berlin: Druck von Emil Ebering, 1909.Google Scholar
Tsui, Brian. China’s Conservative Revolution: The Quest for a New Order, 1927–1949. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Twiss, Travers. Two Introductory Lectures on the Science of International Law. London: Longman, 1856.Google Scholar
Twiss, Travers. The Law of Nations Considered as Independent Political Communities: On the Rights and Duties of Nations in Time of Peace. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1884.Google Scholar
Twiss, Travers. View of the Progress of Political Economy in Europe since the Sixteenth Century. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1847.Google Scholar
Tzouvala, Ntina. Capitalism as Civilisation: A History of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
UNDP. Our 40 Year Journey, 1979–2019: United Nations Development Programme in China. Geneva: UNDP, 2019.Google Scholar
Union Interparlementaire. Compte rendu de la XXVe conférence tenue à Berlin du 23 au 28 août 1928. Lausanne: Librairie Payot & Co., 1928.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de. The Law of Nations, trans. Chitty, Joseph. London: S. Sweet and A. Maxwell, 1834.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de. Le Droit des Gens, ou Principes de la Loi Naturelle Appliqués a la Conduite et aux Affaires des Nations et des Souverains. Paris: J. P. Aillaud, 1835.Google Scholar
Vec, Miloš. “Sources in the 19th Century European Tradition: The Myth of Positivism.” European Journal of International Law 16 (2005): 539–559.Google Scholar
Ven, Hans van de. “Robert Hart and Gustav Detring during the Boxer Rebellion.” Modern Asian Studies 40, no. 3 (2006): 631–662.Google Scholar
Ven, Hans Breaking with the Past: The Maritime Customs Service and the Global Origins of Modernity in China. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Venzke, Ingo. “Introduction: Situating Contingency in the Path of International Law.” In Contingency in International Law: On the Possibility of Different Legal Histories, Venzke, Ingo and Heller, Kevin John, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021: 3–19.Google Scholar
Visscher, Charles de. “Revues de Langue Anglaise.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 49 (1922): 237–239.Google Scholar
Wade, Thomas Francis. Note upon the Condition and Government of the Chinese Empire in 1849. Hong Kong: China Mail Office, 1850.Google Scholar
Waijiaobu Bianzuan Weiyuanhui. Zhongguo Huifu Guanshui Zhuquan zhi Jingguo 中国恢复关税主权之经过. Beijing: Waijiaobu Bianzuan Weiyuanhui, 1929.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. European Universalism: The Rhetoric of Power. New York: The New Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. The Modern World System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750. New York: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Wang, Chung Hui [Wang Chonghui]. The German Civil Code: Translated and Annotated with Historical Introduction and Appendices. London: Stevens and Sons, Ltd., 1907.Google Scholar
Wang, Chung Hui “Peaceful Means for Settling International Disputes.” China Law Review 2 (1926): 336.Google Scholar
Wang, Chung Hui “Jieshao Bijiao Faxue Guoji Huiyi.” Zhonghua Faxue Zazhi 1, no. 2 (1930): 143–149.Google Scholar
Wang, Heng. “Selective Reshaping: China’s Paradigm Shift in International Economic Governance.” Journal of International Economic Law 23, no. 3 (2020): 583–606.Google Scholar
Wang, Hui. Zhongguo xiandai Sixiang de Xingqi, 4 vols. Beijing: Sanlian Shudian, 2004.Google Scholar
Wang, Huning “Lun Xian-Dangdai Zhuquan Lilun de Xin Fazhan.” Zhengzhixue Yanjiu 1 (1985): 39–45.Google Scholar
Wang, Jian “Modern Legal Periodicals of China.” Frontiers of Law in China 2, no. 2 (2007): 318–333.Google Scholar
Wang, Jingwei, ed. Ouzhou Heyi Hou zhi Shijie yu Zhongguo. Shanghai: Minzhi Shuju, 1926.Google Scholar
Wang, Ruicheng. “The ‘Outward Flow of Power’ and the Evolution of the Late Qing Power Structure, 1855–1875.” Modern Chinese History Studies 2 (2012): 28–46.Google Scholar
Wang, Tieya. “International Law in China: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives,” Recueil de Cours de L’Académie de Droit International 221 (1990): 195–369.Google Scholar
Wang, Tseng-Tsai, “The Audience Question: Foreign Representatives and the Emperor of China, 1858–1873.” The Historical Journal 14, no. 3 (1971): 617–626.Google Scholar
Wang, Yanwei and Wang, Liang, eds. Qing Ji Waijiao Shiliao. Beijing: Shumu Wenshu Chubanshe, 1987.Google Scholar
Wang, Yuanchong. “Defining Chosŏn: Qing China’s Depiction of Chosŏn’s Status, 1862–76.” In Remaking the Chinese Empire: Manchu–Korean Relations, 1616–1911. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2018: 121–143.Google Scholar
Wasserstrom, Jeffrey N., ed. Twentieth-Century China: New Approaches. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Weber, Isabella M. How China Escaped Shock Therapy: The Market Reform Debate. Abingdon: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Wehberg, Hans. The Problem of an International Court of Justice, trans. Fenwick, Charles G.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1918.Google Scholar
Wei-man, Huanggong Bowuguan and Fangzhiguan, Jilinnsheng. Wei-Manzhouguo Zhimin Tongzhi Jigou Tuzhi. Jilin: Jilin Renmin Chubanshe, 2010.Google Scholar
Wertheim, Stephen. “The League That Wasn’t: American Designs for a Legalist-Sanctionist League of Nations and the Intellectual Origins of International Organization, 1914–1920.” Diplomatic History 35, no. 5 (2011): 797–836.Google Scholar
Witte, Sergei. The Memoirs of Count Witte. Harcave, Sydney, trans. and ed. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe, 1990.Google Scholar
Wheaton, Henry. Elements of International Law, 6th ed. Lawrence, William Beach, ed. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co., 1855.Google Scholar
Whelan, Daniel J. “‘Under the Aegis of Man’: The Right to Development and the Origins of the New International Economic Order.” Humanity 6, no. 1 (2015): 93–108.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. “Foreword.” In Koselleck, Reinhart. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts, trans. Presner, Todd Samuel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002: 13–23.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
White, John Albert. Transition to Global Rivalry: Alliance Diplomacy and the Quadruple Entente: 1895–1907. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Williams, Edward T. “The Relations between China, Russia, and Mongolia.” American Journal of International Law 10, no. 4 (1916): 798–808.Google Scholar
Williams, S. Wells. “Christian Missions among the Chinese.” In The Middle Kingdom, vol. 2. Leiden: Global Oriental, 2007: 275.Google Scholar
Willoughby, Westel W. China at the Conference: A Report. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1922.Google Scholar
Winfield, Jordan Carlyle. “Buddhism and Insurrection in Burma, 1886–1890.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 20, no. 3 (2010): 345–367.Google Scholar
Winkelmann, Ingo. “Regional Groups in the UN.” In A Concise Encyclopedia of the United Nations, 2nd ed. Volger, Helmut, ed. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.Google Scholar
Wong, John Yue-wo. Deadly Dreams: Opium and the Arrow War (1856–1860) in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Woodhead, Henry G. W., and Montague Bell, Henry T., The China Year Book 1914. London: George Routledge & Sons, 1914.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy. “The Washington Conference.” American Political Science Review 16, no. 2 (1922): 285–297.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy. “Opinion of the Commission of Jurists in the Janina–Corfu Affair.” American Journal of International Law 18, no. 3 (1924): 536–544.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy. “The Outlawry of War and the Law of War.” American Journal of International Law 47, no. 3 (1953): 365–376.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard. The Color Curtain: A Report on the Bandung Conference. New York: World Publishing, 1956.Google Scholar
Wu, Ting-Fang “China’s Attitude towards Arbitration.” In Report of the Annual Lake Mohonk Conference on International Arbitration. New York: Lake Mohonk Conference on International Arbitration, 1909: 67–71.Google Scholar
Wu, Xiping. “Jiu Guojifa zhi Quedian yu Xin Guojifa zhi Yaoqiu.” Zhongfa Daxue Yuekan 1, no. 4 (1932): 1–14.Google Scholar
Xing, Zhiyu. “Cong ‘Shuize Tanpan’ Kan He Guiqing yu Zhongyang Zhengce de Boyi.” Xue Lilun 7 (2019): 135–138.Google Scholar
Xiong, Xiling. “Wei Xiangsheng Xing Lun Cheng Zhang Zhidong.” In Hunan Weixin Yundong Shiliao, Feizhou, Yi, ed. Chansha: Yuelu Shushe, 2013: 223–230.Google Scholar
Yang, Daxin, ed. Beiyang Zhengfu Zongtong yu Zongli. Tianjin: Nankai Daxue Chubanshe, 1989.Google Scholar
Yasuoka, Akio. Meiji zenki tairiku seisaku shi no kenkyū. Tokyo: Hōsei Daigaku Shuppankyoku, 1998.Google Scholar
Yu, Zhong. “Suowei Guoti: Xianfa Shike yu Liang Qichao de Gonghe Zaizao Shike.” Faxuejia 4 (2015): 158–175.Google Scholar
Zarrow, Peter. After Empire: The Conceptual Transformation of the Chinese State, 1885–1924. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Zhai, Qiang. “China and the Geneva Conference of 1954.” China Quarterly 129 (1992): 103–122.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongxin. “Wanqing Zhongguoren de Zhuquan Guannian: Guojifa Shijiao.” Beijing Shixue 10 (2004): 102–134.Google Scholar
Zhang, Zhenguo. “Cong ‘Wu Wu Xiancao’ Dao ‘Zhonghua Minguo Xianfa.’” In Quanguo Waiguo Fazhishi Yanjiuhui Xueshu Congshu: 20 Shiji Xifang Xianzheng de Fazhan ji qi Biange, He, Qinhua, ed. Beijing: Falü Chubanshe, 2004.Google Scholar
Zhongguo Di Er Lishi Dang’an Guan. “Lu Zhengxiang Chuxi Haiya Baohehui Zouzhe Liang Jian.” Minguo Dang’an 2 (2000): 37–42.Google Scholar
Zhonguo Shehui Kexue Yuan Jindaishi Yanjiusuo. Yang Ru Geng-Xin Cun Gao. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chuban, 1979.Google Scholar
Zhou, Gengsheng. “Wanguo Tongmeng zhi San Da Yiyi.” Taipingyang 2, no. 1 (1919): 43–48.Google Scholar
Zhou, Gengsheng. “Zhanqian Zhanhou de Guoji Zhengju.” Taipingyang 2, no. 5 (1920): 1–16.Google Scholar
Zhou, Gengsheng. “Wanguo Lianmeng yu Qiangzhi Hejie.” Taipingyang 2, no. 9 (1920): 1–9.Google Scholar
Zhou, Gengsheng. “1935 Nian zhi Zhanwang: Guolian de Qiantu.” Dongfang Zazhi 32, no. 1 (1935): 25–29.Google Scholar
Zhou, Gengsheng. Xiandai Guojifa de Sixiang Dongxiang. Beijing: Shijie Zhishi Chubanshe, 1963.Google Scholar
Zhou, Ziya. “Cong Guojifa Lichang Lun Meijun Baoxing zhi Xingzhi ji Waiguo Jundui zhi Xingshi Guanxia Wenti.” Guancha 1, no. 23 (1947): 4–7.Google Scholar
Zhou, Ziya. “Chuncui Fa Xueshuo Zhong de ‘Falü’, ‘Guojia’, he ‘Zhengyi’.” Xiandai Waiguo Zhexue Shehui Kexue Wenzhai 8 (1961): 37–38.Google Scholar
Zhou, Ziya. “Ping Chuncui Fa Xueshuo He Ta de Chuangshiren Kaierxun.” Shehui Kexue 1 (1979): 111–114.Google Scholar
Zhou, Ziya and Luo, Shipei. “Cong ‘Guojia Quanli’ Zouxiang ‘Shijie Quanli’: Gaizao Shijie de Yi Ge Jiben Yuanze.” Zhongyang Zhoukan 8, no. 4 (1946): 5.Google Scholar
Zhu, Chuangyu, ed. Wang Chonghui Zhuanji Ziliao, vols. 1–3. Taipei: Tian Yi Chubanshe, 1979.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xueshan. “Cong ‘Yi Wen Hui You’ Tan Qi: Xiao Yi Zhongguo Guoji Jingjifa Xuehui Zishen Jianshe Wenti.” Guoji Jingji Fa Xue Kan 4 (2004): 417–422.Google Scholar
Zhu, Yuan Yi. “Suzerainty, Semi-sovereignty, and International Legal Hierarchies on China’s Borderlands.” Asian Journal of International Law 10, no. 2 (2020): 293–320.Google Scholar
Zuo, Zongtang. “Preface.” In Lin Wen Zhong Gong Zheng Shu. Shanghai: Shangwu Yinshuguan, 1935.Google Scholar