Book contents
- Reading in a Second Language
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Reading in a Second Language
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Part I Foundations of Reading
- Part II Patterns of Variation in Reading
- Part III Developing Reading Comprehension Abilities
- Part IV Expanding Reading Comprehension Skills
- Part V Applications of Reading Research: Instruction and Assessment
- References
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2022
Book contents
- Reading in a Second Language
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Reading in a Second Language
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Part I Foundations of Reading
- Part II Patterns of Variation in Reading
- Part III Developing Reading Comprehension Abilities
- Part IV Expanding Reading Comprehension Skills
- Part V Applications of Reading Research: Instruction and Assessment
- References
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reading in a Second LanguageMoving from Theory to Practice, pp. 487 - 556Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Aarts, R., Demir-Vegter, S., Kurvers, J., & Henrichs, L. (2016). Academic language in shared book reading: Parent and teacher input to mono- and bilingual preschoolers. Language Learning, 66(2), 263–295.Google Scholar
Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning on screen versus paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Acronyms, initialisms, and abbreviations dictionary (Multiple available, multiple years). (See Crystal, 2019, pp. 130–131).Google Scholar
Adams, B., Bell, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A trading relationship between reading skill and domain knowledge in children’s text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adlof, S. M. (2019). Prologue to the forum: Vocabulary across the school grades. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50, 461–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adlof, S. M., Baron, L. S., Scoggins, J., et al. (2019). Accelerating adolescent vocabulary growth: Development of an individualized, web-based, vocabulary instruction program. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(6), 579–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adlof, S. M., & Perfetti, C. A. (2014). Individual differences in word learning and reading ability. In Stone, C. A., Silliman, E. R., Ehren, B. J. et al. (Eds.), Handbook of language & literacy (2nd ed., pp. 246–264). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Afflerbach, P. (2007). Best practices in literacy assessment. In Gambrell, L. B., Morrow, L. M., & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (3rd ed., pp. 264–282). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Afflerbach, P. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of individual differences in reading. Routledge.Google Scholar
Afflerbach, P., Cho, B.-Y., & Kim, J.-Y. (2014). Inaccuracy and reading in multiple text and internet/hypertext environments. In Rapp, D. N. & Braasch, J. L. G. (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information (pp. 403–424). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. (2017). Skills and strategies: Their differences, their relationships, and why they matter. In Mokhtari, K. (Ed.), Improving reading comprehension through metacognitive reading strategies instruction (pp. 33–49). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Y., Francis, D. J., York, M., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44–45, 68–82.Google Scholar
Akamatsu, N. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Japanese-English bilinguals. In Joshi, R. M. & Aaron, P. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 481–496). L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Akkakoson, S. (2013). The relationship between strategic reading instruction, student learning of L2-based reading strategies and L2 reading achievement. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 422–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem? In Alderson, J. C. & Urquhart, A. H. (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 1–24). Longman.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (1993). The relationship between grammar and reading in an English for academic purposes test battery. In Douglas, D. & Chapelle, C. (Eds.), A new decade of language testing research: Selected papers from the 1990 language testing research colloquium (pp. 203–219). TESOL.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C., Haapakangas, E.-L., Huhta, A., Nieminen, L., & Ullakonoja, R. (2015). The diagnosis of reading in a second and foreign language. Routledge.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C., Huhta, A., & Nieminen, L. (2016). Characteristics of weak and strong readers in a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 853–879.Google Scholar
Alexander, P. A. (2018). Engagement and literacy: Reading between the lines. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(4), 732–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, P. A. (2020). What research has revealed about readers’ struggles with comprehension in the digital age: Moving beyond the phonics versus whole language debate. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), 89–97.Google Scholar
Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285–310). Longman.Google Scholar
Al-Homoud, F., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Extensive reading in a challenging environment: A comparison of extensive and intensive reading approaches in Saudi Arabia. Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 383–401.Google Scholar
Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). Five building blocks for comprehension strategy instruction. In León, J. A. & Escudero, I. (Eds.), Reading comprehension in educational settings (pp. 125–144). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Allington, R. L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The Reading Teacher, 36, 556–561.Google Scholar
Almasi, J. F., & Fullerton, S. K. (2012). Teaching strategic processes in reading. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Almasi, J. F., & Hart, S. J. (2019). Best practices in narrative text comprehension instruction. In Morrow, L. M. & Gambrell, L. B. (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (6th ed., pp. 221–249). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Alsadoon, R., & Heift, T. (2015). Textual input enhancement for vowel blindness: A study with Arabic ESL learners. Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 57–79.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2015). A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. & O’Grady, W. (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 511–536). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anderman, E., & Wolters, C. (2006). Goals, values, and affect: Influences on student motivation. In Alexander, P. A. & Winne, P. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 369–389). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (2000). Learning and memory: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (2015). Cognitive psychology and its implications (8th ed.). Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (2020). Cognitive psychology and its implications (9th ed.). Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Anderson, N. J. (2009). ACTIVE reading: The research base for a pedagogical approach in the reading classroom. In Han, Z.-H. & Anderson, N. J. (Eds.), Second language reading: Research and instruction (pp. 117–143). University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. J. (2014). Developing engaged second language readers. In Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed., pp. 170–188). Cengage/National Geographic Learning.Google Scholar
Anderson, N. J. (2014–2015). Active skills for reading (3rd ed., 4 Vols.). Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Anderson, N. J. (2015). Academic reading expectations and challenges. In Evans, N. W., Anderson, N. J., & Eggington, W. E. (Eds.), ESL readers and writers in higher education: Understanding challenges, providing support (pp. 95–109). Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P., & Fielding, L. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 285–303.Google Scholar
Andrews, S. (2015). Individual differences among skilled readers: The role of lexical quality. In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 129–148). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, S., & Reynolds, G. (2013). Why is it easier to wreak havoc than unleash havoc. In Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R., & Rouet, J.-R. (Eds.), Reading – From words to multiple texts (pp. 72–91). Routledge.Google Scholar
Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10, Serial No. 238), 1–165.Google Scholar
Araújo, S., Reis, A., Petersson, K. M., & Faísca, L. (2015). Rapid automatized naming and reading performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 868–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardasheva, Y., Wang, Z., Adesope, O. O., & Valentine, J. C. (2017). Exploring effectiveness and moderators of language learning strategy instruction on second language and self-regulated learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 544–582.Google Scholar
Arfé, B., Mason, L., & Fajardo, I. (2018). Simplifying informational text structure for struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 31, 2191–2210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armbruster, B., Anderson, T., & Meyer, J. (1991). Improving content area reading using instructional graphics. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 393–416.Google Scholar
Aro, M. (2017). Learning to read Finnish. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 416–436). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arriaga, R., Fenson, L., Cronan, T., & Pethick, S. (1998). Scores on the MacArthur communication developmental inventory of children from low- and middle-income families. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 209–223.Google Scholar
Arrington, C. N., Kutesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 325–346.Google Scholar
Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2015). Cross-country generalizability of the role of metacognitive knowledge in students’ strategy use and reading competence. Teachers College Record, 117(1), 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J., & Rayner, K. (2006). Literacy development: Insights from research on skilled reading. In Dickerson, D. & Neuman, S. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 52–63). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
August, D. (2006). Demographic overview. In August, D. & Shanahan, T. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners (pp. 43–49). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Aviad-Levitsky, T., Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2019). The new computer adaptive test of size and strength (CATSS): Development and validation. Language Assessment Quarterly, 16(3), 345–368.Google Scholar
Baba, K. (2009). Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 191–208.Google Scholar
Babayiğit, S. (2014). The role of oral language skills in reading and listening comprehension of text: A comparison of monolingual (L1) and bilingual (L2) speakers of English language. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(S1), S22–S47.Google Scholar
Babayiğit, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2011). Modeling the relationships between cognitive-linguistic skills and literacy skills: New insights from a transparent orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2015). Working memory in second language learning. In Wen, Z., Mota, M. B., & McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 17–28). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Baggetta, P., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Conceptualization and operationalization of executive function. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(1), 10–33.Google Scholar
Bailey, M. J., Sun, S., & Timpe, B. (2018). Prep school for poor kids: The long-run impacts of head start on human capital and economic self-sufficiency. Department of Economics, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Baker, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In Block, C. & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 77–95). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Baker, L. (2017). The development of metacognitive knowledge and control of comprehension: Contributors and consequences. In Mokhtari, K. (Ed.), Improving reading comprehension through metacognitive reading strategy instruction (pp. 1–31). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Baker, L., DeWyngaert, L. U., & Zeliger-Kandasamy, A. (2015). Metacognition in comprehension instruction: New directions. In Parris, S. R. & Headley, K. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (3rd ed., pp. 72–87). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Baker, L., Fernandez-Fein, S., Scher, D., & Williams, H. (1998). Home experiences related to the development of word recognition. In Metsala, J. & Ehri, L (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 263–287). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Balota, D., Yap, M., & Cortese, M. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (A travel update). In Traxler, M. & Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 285–375). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2005). The evolution of social cognitive theory. In Smith, K. G. & Hill, M. A. (Eds.), Great minds in management (pp. 9–35). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Banich, M. T., & Compton, R. J. (2018). Cognitive Neuroscience (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bannard, C., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2009, October 19). Modeling children’s early grammatical knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106(41), 17284–17289.Google Scholar
Baron, N. S., Calixte, R. M., & Havewala, M. (2017). The persistence of print among university students: An exploratory study. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 590–604.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. (1992). Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. (2012). The human conceptual system. The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 239–258). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barth, A. E., Barnes, M. A., Francis, D. J., Vaughn, S., & York, M. (2015). Inferential processing among adequate and struggling adolescent comprehenders and relations to reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 587–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barzillai, M., Thomson, J., Schroeder, S., & van den Broek, P. (Eds.). (2018). Learning to read in a digital world. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (2019). Does Head Start work? The debate over the Head Start Impact Study, explained. Brookings Brown Center Chalkboard. www.brookings.edu/blog/brown–center–chalkboard/2019/06/14/does–head–start–work–the–debate–over–the–head–start–impact–study–explained/Google Scholar
Bax, S. (2013). The cognitive processing of candidates during reading tests: Evidence from eye-tracking. Language Testing, 30(4), 441–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. (2006). Improving comprehension with questioning the author. Scholastic.Google Scholar
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G., & Loxterman, J. (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 251–276.Google Scholar
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Worthy, J., Sandora, C., & Kucan, L. (1996). Questioning the author: A year-long implementation to engage students with text. Elementary School Journal, 94, 358–414.Google Scholar
Beck, I. L., & Sandora, C. (2016). Illuminating comprehension and close reading. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 773–785.Google Scholar
Beglar, D., & Hunt, A. (2014). Pleasure reading and reading rate gains. Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(1), 29–48.Google Scholar
Beglar, D., Hunt, A., & Kite, Y. (2012). The effect of pleasure reading on Japanese university EFL learners’ reading rates. Language Learning, 62(3), 665–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beker, K., Jolles, D., Lorch, R. F., Jr., & van den Broek, P. (2016). Learning from texts: Activation of information from previous texts during reading. Reading and Writing, 29, 1161–1178.Google Scholar
Beker, K., Jolles, D., & van den Broek, P. (2017). Meaningful learning from texts: The construction of knowledge representations. In León, J. A. & Escudero, I. (Eds.), Reading comprehension in educational settings (pp. 29–62). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Beker, K., Kim, J., Van Boekel, M., van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2019). Refutation texts enhance spontaneous transfer of knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56(1), 67–78.Google Scholar
Bennett, K., Weigel, D., & Martin, S. (2002). Children’s acquisition of early literacy skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 295–317.Google Scholar
Berent, I. (2013). Reading is recycling–It’s human nature. In Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R., & Rouet, J.-F. (Eds.), Reading – From words to multiple texts (pp. 1–16). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, E. (2010). Understanding advanced second language reading. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 39–56.Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth of phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 141–163.Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., & Richards, T. (2002). Brain literacy for educators and psychologists. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (2011). Relations between executive function and academic achievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative national sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 327–336.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, & cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 240–250.Google Scholar
Bismoko, J., & Nation, I. S. P. (1974). English reading speed and the mother-tongue or national language. RELC Journal, 5(1), 86–89.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A. (2018). Being suspicious of the sense of ease and undeterred by the sense of difficulty. Perspectives on Cognitive Psychology, 13, 146–148.Google Scholar
Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2008). Strategies for reading for information. In Blachowicz, C. & Ogle, D., Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent learners (2nd ed., pp. 91–128). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–73.Google Scholar
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.Google Scholar
Block, C., & Pressley, M. (2002a). Introduction. In Block, C. & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 1–7). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Block, C., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (2002b). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Block, C., & Pressley, M. (2007). Best practices in teaching comprehension. In Gambrell, L. B., Morrow, L. M., & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 220–242). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Boardman, A. G., Boelé, A. L., & Klingner, J. K. (2017). Strategy instruction shifts teacher and student interactions during text-based discussions. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(2), 175–195.Google Scholar
Boers, F. (2020). Factors affecting the learning of multiword items. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 143–157). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bogaerds-Hazenberg, S. T. M., Evers-Vermuel, J., & van den Bergh, H. (2020). A meta-analysis on the effects of text-structure instruction on reading comprehension in the upper elementary grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(3), 435–462.Google Scholar
Boggs, S. (1985). Speaking, relating and learning: A study of Hawaiian children at home and at school. Ablex.Google Scholar
Booth, J. N., Boyle, J. M. E., & Kelly, S. W. (2014). The relationship between inhibition and working memory in predicting children’s reading difficulties. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 84–101.Google Scholar
Bowden, H. W., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2013). Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2492–2511.Google Scholar
Braasch, J. L. G., Goldman, S. R., & Wiley, J. (2013). The influence of text and reader characteristics on learning from refutations in science texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 561–578.Google Scholar
Brantmeier, C., Sullivan, J. H., & Strube, M. (2014). Toward independent L2 readers: Effects of text adjuncts, subject knowledge, L1 reading, and L2 language proficiency. Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(2), 34–53.Google Scholar
Branum-Martin, L., Tao, S., & Garnaat, S. (2015). Bilingual phonological awareness: Reexamining the evidence for relations within and across languages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 111–125.Google Scholar
Branum-Martin, L., Tao, S., Garnaat, S., Bunta, F., & Francis, D. J. (2012). Meta-analysis of bilingual phonological awareness: Language, age, and psycholinguistic grain size. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 932–944.Google Scholar
Brezina, V., & Gablasova, D. (2015). Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the New General Service List. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Z. (1987). Increasing first graders’ reading accuracy and comprehension by accelerating their reading rate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 236–242.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Z. (2001). The determinants of reading fluency: A comparison of dyslexic and average readers. In Wolf, M. (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency and the brain (pp. 245–276). York Press.Google Scholar
Brice, H., Mencl, W. E., Frost, S. J., et al. (2019). Neurobiological signatures of L2 proficiency: Evidence from a bi-directional cross-linguistic study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 7–16.Google Scholar
Brimo, D., Apel, K., & Fountain, T. (2017). Examining the contributions of syntactic awareness and syntactic knowledge to reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (2017a). The evolving architecture of content-based instruction. In Brinton, D. M. & Snow, M. A. (Eds.), The content-based classroom (2nd ed., pp. 2–20). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (Eds.). (2017b). The content-based classroom. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Durik, A. M. (2018). Literacy beyond text comprehension. Routledge.Google Scholar
Britton, B., & Gulgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch’s computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329–345.Google Scholar
Britton, B., Gulgoz, S., & Glynn, S. (1993). Impact of good and poor writing on learners: Research and theory. In Britton, B. et al. (Eds.), Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice (pp. 1–46). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (2017). Comprehensive strategies instruction for learners of English: Where have we been, where are we now, where we might still go. In Israel, S. E. (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 543–567). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 18–37.Google Scholar
Browne, C. (2013a). New general service list. Retrieved on March 21, 2021, from www.newgeneralservicelist.org/nawl–new–academic–word–listGoogle Scholar
Browne, C. (2013b). New academic word list. Retrieved on March 21, 2021, from www.newgeneralservicelist.org/nawl–new–academic–word–listGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M. (2019) How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, 104047.Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016). How many words do we know? Practical estimates of vocabulary size dependent on word definition, the degree of language input and the participant’s age. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1116), 1–12.Google Scholar
Burchinal, M., McCartney, K., Steinberg, L., et al. (2011). Examining the black–white achievement gap among low income children using the NICHD study of child care and youth development. Child Development, 82(5), 1404–1420.Google Scholar
Bus, A., & van IJzendoorn, M. (1988). Mother–child interaction, attachment, and emergent literacy: A cross-sectional study. Child Development, 59, 1262–1272.Google Scholar
Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2018). The role of executive functions in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 801–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cadime, I., Rodriegues, B., Santos, S., et al. (2017). The role of word recognition, oral reading fluency, and listening comprehension in the simple view of reading: A study in an intermediate depth orthography. Reading and Writing, 30, 591–611.Google Scholar
Cain, K., & Barnes, M. A. (2017). Reading comprehension: What develops and when? In Cain, K., Compton, D. L., & Parrila, R. K. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 257–281). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cain, K., Compton, D. L., & Parrila, R. K. (Eds.). (2017). Theories of reading development. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cain, K., & Nash, H. M. (2011). The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 429–441.Google Scholar
Campbell, F., Goldstein, S., Schaefer, E., & Ramey, C. (1991). Parental beliefs and values related to family risk, educational intervention, and child academic competence. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6, 167–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantin, R. H., Gnaedinger, E. K., Gallaway, K. C., Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Hund, A. M. (2016). Executive functioning predicts reading, mathematics, theory of mind during the elementary years. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 146(1), 66–78.Google Scholar
Cao, F. (2018). Brain mechanisms of Chinese word reading. In Pae, H. K. (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences (pp. 137–162). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M. (2017). Learning to read Czech and Slovak. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 371–392). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., & Samara, A. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (1978). The child as word learner. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J., & Miller, G. (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 264–293). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment. Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Goodwin, A. P. (2014). Morphemes matter: How morphological knowledge contributes to reading and writing. In Stone, C. A., Silliman, E. R., Ehren, B. J., & Wallach, G. P. (Eds.), Handbook of language & literacy (2nd ed., pp. 265–282). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., Kelcey, B., Rowan, B., & Phelps, G. (2011). Teachers’ knowledge about early reading: Effects on student gains in reading achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 289–321.Google Scholar
Carrell, P., Pharis, B., & Liberto, J. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 647–678.Google Scholar
Carter, R., Aldridge, S., Page, M., & Parker, S. (2019). The human brain book (3rd ed.). DK Publishing.Google Scholar
Cartmill, E. A., ArmstrongIII, B. F., Gleitman, L. R., Goldin-Meadow, S., Medina, T. N., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013, July 9). Quality of early parent input predicts child vocabulary 3 years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 110(28), 11278–11283.Google Scholar
Cartwright, K. B. (2015). Executive skills and reading comprehension (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, K. B., Lee, S. A., Taboada Barber, A., Dewyngaert, L. U., Lane, A. B., & Singleton, T. (2020). Contributions of executive function and cognitive intrinsic motivation to university students’ reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(3), 345–369.Google Scholar
Carver, R. (1992). Reading rate: Theory, research, and practical implications. Journal of Reading, 36, 84–95.Google Scholar
Carver, R. (1994). Percentage of unknown vocabulary words in text as a function of the relative difficulty of the text: Implications for instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 413–437.Google Scholar
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51.Google Scholar
Catts, H. W. (2018). The simple view of reading: Advancements and false impressions. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 317–323.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M. (2002). Why it makes sense to teach grammar in context and through discourse. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 119–133). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cervetti, G. N. (2020). The nature and development of reading for understanding. In Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., & Berman, A. I. (Eds.), Reaping the rewards of the Reading for Understanding initiative (pp. 41–66). National Academy of Education.Google Scholar
Cervetti, G. N., Wright, T. S., & Hwang, H. (2016). Conceptual coherence, comprehension, and vocabulary acquisition: A knowledge effect? Reading and Writing, 29, 761–779.Google Scholar
Cervetti, G. N. Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., Afflerbach, P., Kendeou, P., Biancarosa, G., Higgs, J., Fitzgerald, M. S., & Berman, A. I. (2020). How the Reading for Understanding initiative’s research complicates the simple view of reading invoked in the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), 161–72.Google Scholar
Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited: The new Dale–Chall readability formula. Brookline Books.Google Scholar
Chang, L.-Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2018). Measurement and implications for reading. In Pae, H. K. (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences (pp. 50–71). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C., Enright, M., & Jamieson, J. (Eds.). (2008). Building a validity argument for the test of English as a foreign language. Routledge.Google Scholar
Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Squeezing through the now–or–never bottleneck: Reconnecting language processing, acquisition, change, and structure. Behavioral and Brain Science, 39, 46–71.Google Scholar
Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Language acquisition as skill learning. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 205–208.Google Scholar
Chen, H.-C., & Graves, M. (1995). Effects of previewing and providing background knowledge on Taiwanese college students’ comprehension of American short stories. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 663–686.Google Scholar
Chen, R.-S., & Vellutino, F. (1997). Prediction of reading ability: A cross-validation study of the simple view of reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 29(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Dronjic, V., & Helms-Park, R. (Eds.). (2016). Reading in a second language: Cognitive and psycholinguistic issues. Routledge.Google Scholar
Chen, X., & Pasquarella, A. (2017). Learning to read Chinese. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 31–56). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, B. Y., & Afflerbach, P. (2017). An evolving perspective on constructively responsive reading comprehension strategies in multilayered digital text environments. In Israel, S. E. (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 109–134). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cho, J.-R., & McBride-Chang, C. (2005). Correlates of Korean Hangul acquisition among kindergarten and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
Chow, B., McBride-Chang, C., & Burgess, S. (2005). Phonological processing skills and early reading abilities in Hong Kong Chinese kindergartners learning to read English as a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 564–571.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Implicit statistical learning: A tale of two literatures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11, 468–481.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., & Arnon, I. (2017). More than words: The role of multiword sequences in language learning and use. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 542–551.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016a). The now–or–never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Science, 39, 1–72.Google Scholar
Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 248–263.Google Scholar
Chung, K. K. H., Lam, C. B., & Leung, C. O. Y. (2020). Contributions of executive functioning to Chinese and English reading comprehension in Chinese adolescent readers with dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 33, 1721–1743.Google Scholar
Chung, S. C., Chen, X., & Geva, E. (2019). Deconstructing and reconstructing cross-language transfer in bilingual reading development: An interactive framework. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 149–161.Google Scholar
Cipielewski, J., & Stanovich, K. (1992). Predicting growth in reading ability from children’s exposure to print. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 74–89.Google Scholar
Cirino, P., Miciak, J., Ahmed, Y., Barnes, M., Taylor, W. P., & Gerst, E. H. (2019). Executive function: Association with multiple reading skills. Reading and Writing, 32, 1819–1846.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (1980). The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading: Or when language competence interferes with reading performance. Modern Language Journal, 64, 203–209.Google Scholar
Clayton, F. J., West, G., Sears, C., Hulme, C., & Lervåg, A. (2020). A longitudinal study of early reading development: Letter–sound knowledge, phoneme awareness and RAN, but not letter–sound integration, predict variations in reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(2), 91–107.Google Scholar
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (2017). Reading and technology: What’s new and what’s old about treading in hyperlinked multimedia environments. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol III, pp. 312–327). Routledge.Google Scholar
Coe, R. (2002). The new rhetoric of genre: Writing political briefs. In Johns, A. (Ed.), Genre in the classroom (pp. 197–207). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 352–392.Google Scholar
Coiro, J. (2015). Purposeful, critical, and flexible: Vital dimensions of online reading and learning. In Spiro, R., DeSchryver, M., Hagerman, M., Morsink, P., & Thompson, P. (Eds.), Reading at a crossroads? Disjunctures and continuities in current conceptions and practices (pp. 53–64). Routledge.Google Scholar
Coiro, J. (2021). Toward a multifaceted heuristic of digital reading to inform assessment, research, practice, and policy. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 9–31.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.Google Scholar
Commeau, L., Cormier, P., Grandmaison, E., & Lacroix, D. (1999). A longitudinal study of phonological processing skills in children learning to read in a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 29–43.Google Scholar
Compton, D. L., Appleton, A. C., Elleman, A. M., & Steacy, L. M. (2014). Have we forsaken reading theory in the name of “quick fix” interventions for children with reading disability? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 55–73.Google Scholar
Connor, U. (2011). Intercultural rhetoric in the writing classroom. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. N. (Eds.). (2009a). Variation in working memory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. N. (2009b). Variation in working memory: An introduction. In Conway, A. et al. (Eds), Variation in working memory (pp. 3–17). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2015). Passive activation and instantiation of inferences during reading. In O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Lorch, R. F., Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 19–41). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (2015). Second language use, theories of working memory and the Vennian mind. In Wen, Z., Mota, M. B., & McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 29–40). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cox, B., Shanahan, T., & Sulzby, E. (1990). Good and poor elementary readers’ use of cohesion in writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 47–65.Google Scholar
Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 687–700.Google Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S., & Dascalu, M. (2019). Moving beyond classical readability formulas: New methods and new models. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(3–4), 541–561.Google Scholar
Crosson, A. C., & Lesaux, N. K. (2013). Does knowledge of connectives play a unique role in the reading comprehension of English learners and English-only students? Journal of Research in Reading, 36(3), 241–260.Google Scholar
Crosson, A. C., McKeown, M. G., & Ward, A. K., Jr. (2019). An innovative approach to assessing depth of knowledge. Language Assessment Quarterly, 18(2), 196–216.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2010). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2019). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation: Results of structural equation modeling. Modern Language Journal, 89, 19–36.Google Scholar
Cumming, A., Lai, C., & Cho, H. (2016). Students’ writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 47–58.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 222–251.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority children. In Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49). National Dissemination and Assessment Center.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E. (2005). Vocabulary growth through independent reading and reading aloud to children. In Hiebert, E. & Kamil, M. (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary (pp. 45–68). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E., Etter, K., Platas, L., Wheeler, S., & Campbell, K. (2015). Professional development in emergent literacy: An examination of teacher study groups. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 31, 62–77.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E., & O’Donnell, C. R. (2012). Reading and vocabulary growth. In Kame’enui, E. J. & Baumann, J. F. (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (2nd ed. pp. 256–279). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E., & O’Donnell, C. R. (2015). Teachers’ knowledge about beginning reading development and instruction. In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 447–462). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22, 8–15.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E., & Zibulsky, J. (2009). Perspectives on teachers’ disciplinary knowledge of reading processes, development, and pedagogy. Reading and Writing, 22, 375–378.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E., Zibulsky, J., & Callahan, M. (2009). Starting small: Building preschool teacher knowledge supports early literacy development. Reading and Writing, 22, 487–510.Google Scholar
Currie, N. F., & Cain, K. (2015). Children’s inference generation: The role of vocabulary knowledge and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 57–75.Google Scholar
Currie, N. K., Francey, G., Davies, R., Gray, S., Bridges, M. S., Restrepo, M. A., Thompson, M. S., Ciraolo, M. F., Hu, J., & Cain, K. (2021). The process and product of coherence monitoring in young readers: Effects of reader and text characteristics. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(2), 141–158.Google Scholar
Cutting, L., & Scarborough, H. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–300.Google Scholar
Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42, 462–473.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2017). Same but different: Content and language integrated learning and content-based instruction. In Brinton, D. M. & Snow, M. A. (Eds.), The content-based classroom (2nd ed., pp. 151–162). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 46, 545–559.Google Scholar
Damico, J. S., & Panos, A. (2016). Reading for reliability: Preservice teachers evaluate web sources about climate change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(3), 275–285.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Merilke, P. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422–433.Google Scholar
DataReportal. (2021). Global digital insights. United States of America. Retrieved on April 4, 2021, from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital–2021–united–states–of–americaGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (n.d.). Corpus of contemporary American English. www.english-corpora.org/cocaGoogle Scholar
Davison, C., & Leung, C. (2009). Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 392–415.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Francis, K., & Tong, X. (2017). The relationship of morphological analysis and morphological decoding to reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Holliman, A. J., Dobson, G. J., & Harrison, E. C. J. (2018). Assessing direct contributions to morphological awareness and prosodic sensitivity to children’s word reading and reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(6), 527–534,Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., & Kieffer, M. J. (2018). Understanding how syntactic awareness contributes to reading comprehension: Evidence from mediation and longitudinal models. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 72–86.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Kieffer, M. J., & Laroche, A. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Evidence from mediation and longitudinal models. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(6), 432–451.Google Scholar
Degand, L., & Sanders, T. (2002). The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing, 15, 739–757.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125–151). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Conclusion: The future of practice. In De Keyser, R. (Ed.), Practice in a second language (pp. 287–304). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 94–112). Routledge.Google Scholar
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis of the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38.Google Scholar
Dexter, D. D., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 34(1), 51–72.Google Scholar
Dick, A. S., Bernal, B., & Trembley, P. (2014). The language connectome: New pathways, new concepts. The Neuroscientist, 20(5), 453–467.Google Scholar
Dickinson, D. K., McCabe, A., & Essex, M. (2006). A window of opportunity we must open to all: The case for preschool with high-quality support for language and literacy. In Dickinson, D. K. & Neuman, S. B. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 11–28). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dickinson, D. K., St. Pierre, R., & Pettengill, J. (2004). High-quality classrooms: A key ingredient to family literacy programs. In Wasik, B. (Ed.), Handbook of family literacy (pp. 137–154). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences in English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2019). The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2020). A dynamic network approach to the study of syntax. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(604853), 1–15.Google Scholar
Dobler, E. (2015). E-textbooks: A personalized learning experience or a digital distraction? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(6), 482–491.Google Scholar
Dobler, E., & Eagleton, M. B. (2015). Reading the web: Strategies for internet inquiry (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dolezal, S., Welsh, L., Pressley, M., & Vincent, M. (2003). How nine third-grade teachers motivate student academic engagement. Elementary School Journal, 103, 239–267.Google Scholar
Domínguez de Ramírez, R., & Shapiro, E. S. (2007). Cross-language relationship between Spanish and English oral reading fluency among Spanish-speaking English language learners in bilingual education classrooms. Psychology in the Schools, 44(8), 795–806.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., Macintyre, P. D., & Henry, A. (Eds.). (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar
Dressler, C., Carlo, M. S., Snow, C. E., August, D., & White, C. E. (2011). Spanish speaking students’ use of cognate knowledge to infer the meaning of English words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(2), 243–255.Google Scholar
Dronjic, V., & Bitan, T. (2016). Reading, brain, and cognition. In Chen, X., Dronjic, V., & Helms-Park, R. (Eds.), Reading in a second language: Cognitive and psycholinguistic issues (pp. 32–69). Routledge.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., White, R. E., Matteuci, A. J., Shearer, A., & Gross, J. J. (2016). A stitch in time: Strategic self-control in high school and college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 329–341.Google Scholar
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), 25–44.Google Scholar
Duke, N. K., & Martin, N. M. (2019). Best practices in informational text comprehension instruction. In Morrow, L. M. & Gambrell, L. B. (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (6th ed., pp. 250–270). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In Farstrup, A. & Samuels, S. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction. (3rd ed., pp. 205–242). International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Durgunoglu, A. Y. (2006). How language characteristics influence Turkish literacy development. In Joshi, R. M. & Aaron, P. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 219–229). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Durgunoglu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 453–465.Google Scholar
Durik, A. M., Vuida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 382–393.Google Scholar
Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader–text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 515–528.Google Scholar
Eason, S. H., Sabatini, J., Goldberg, L., Bruce, K., & Cutting, L. E. (2013). Examining the relationship between word reading efficiency and oral reading rate in predicting comprehension among different types of readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(3), 199–223.Google Scholar
Eccles, J., & Wang, M.-T. (2012). Part I commentary: So what is student engagement? In Reschly, A. L., Christenson, S. L. & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133–145). Springer.Google Scholar
Ecker, U. K. H., Swire, B., & Lewandowsky, S. (2014). Correcting misinformation – A challenge for education and cognitive science. In Rapp, D. N. & Braasch, J. L. G. (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information (pp. 13–37). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. (2014). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. (2015). How children learn to read words. In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 293–310). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, M.-F. (1996). Metacognitive monitoring in the processing of anaphoric devices in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. In Cornoldi, C. & Oakhill, J. (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties (pp. 221–249). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, M.-F., Remond, M., & Tardieu, H. (1999). Processing anaphoric devices in young skilled and less-skilled comprehenders: Differences in metacognitive monitoring. Reading and Writing, 11, 29–63.Google Scholar
Einstein, G., McDaniel, M., Owen, P., & Cote, N. (1990). Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 566–581.Google Scholar
Elgort, I., Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., & Van Asch, E. (2018). Contextual word learning during reading in a second language: An eye-movement study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 341–366.Google Scholar
Elgort, I., Perfetti, C. A., Rickles, B., & Stafura, J. (2015). Contextual learning of L2 word meanings: Second language proficiency modulates behavioral and ERP indicators of learning. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30(5), 506–528.Google Scholar
Elgort, I., & Warren, P. (2014). L2 vocabulary learning from reading: Explicit and tacit lexical knowledge and the role of learner and item variables. Language Learning, 64(2), 365–414.Google Scholar
Elleman, A. M. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less-skilled readers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761–781.Google Scholar
Elleman, A. M., Oslund, E. L., Griffin, N. M., & Myers, K. E. (2019). A review of middle school vocabulary interventions: Five research-based recommendations for practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50, 477–492.Google Scholar
Elley, W. (2000). The potential of book floods for raising literacy levels. International Journal of Education, 46, 233–255.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613–628.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 297–339.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006a). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–24.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006b). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue, competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164–194.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2007). The associative-cognitive CREED. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 77–95). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2015). Implicit AND explicit language learning. In Rebuschat, P. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 3–23). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2017). Cognition, corpora, and computing: Triangulating research in usage-based language learning. Language Learning, 67(S1), 40–65.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2019). Essentials of a theory of language cognition. Modern Language Journal, 103(Supp), 39–60.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics – Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27, 558–589.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Romer, U. (2015). Usage-based language learning. In MacWhinney, B. & O’Grady, W. (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 163–180). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Ogden, D. C. (2017). Thinking about multiword constructions: Usage-based approaches to acquisition and processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 604–620.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2015). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 75–93). Routledge.Google Scholar
Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ender, A. (2016). Implicit and explicit cognitive processes in incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 536–560.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In Mikake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory : Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enright, M., Bridgeman, B., Cline, M., Eignor, D., Lee, Y.-W., & Powers, D. (2002). Evaluating measures of communicative language abilities. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. Salt, Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2018). The differential influence of experience, practice, and deliberate practice on the development of superior individual performance of experts. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. A., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 745–769). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211–245.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Esposito, C. (1999). Learning in urban blight: School climate and its effects on the school performance of urban, minority, low-income children. School Psychology Review, 28, 365–377.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2015). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook (7th ed.). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2020). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook (8th ed.). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Individual differences in sentence processing. In Spivey, M. J., McRae, K., & Joanisse, M. F. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 353–364). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farnia, F., & Geva, E. (2013). Growth and predictors of change in English language learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 389–421.Google Scholar
Feller, A., Grindal, T., Miratrix, L., & Page, L. C. (2016). Compared to what? Variation in the impacts of early childhood education by alternative care type. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 10(3), 1245–1285.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A., & Weisleder, A. (2013). SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science, 16(2), 234–248.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. (2009). Teaching college writing to diverse student populations. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2019). Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction. In Morrow, L. M. & Gambrell, L. B. (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (6th ed., pp. 150–172). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fitton, L., McIlraith, A. L., & Wood, C. L. (2018). Shared book reading interventions with English learners: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(5), 712–751.Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S., Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2017). Research support for content-based instruction In Snow, M. A. & Brinton, D. M. (Eds.), The content-based classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content (2nd ed. pp. 21–35). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, C. (1994). Levels of representation in memory for discourse. In Gernsbacher, M. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 589–607). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Follmer, D. J. (2018). Executive function and reading comprehension: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 42–60.Google Scholar
Foorman, B. R., Koon, S., Petschur, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). Examining general and specific factors in the dimensionality of oral language and reading in 4th–10th grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 884–899.Google Scholar
Foorman, B. R., Petschur, Y., & Herrera, S. (2018). Unique and common effects of decoding and language factors in predicting reading comprehension in grades 1–10. Learning and Individual Differences, 63, 12–23.Google Scholar
Foy, J. G., & Mann, V. A. (2013). Executive function and early reading skills. Reading and Writing, 26, 453–472.Google Scholar
Fraser, C., Massey-Garrison, A., & Geva, E. (2016). Problems with reading. In Chen, X., Dronjic, V., & Helms-Park, R. (Eds.), Reading in a second language: Cognitive and psycholinguistics issues (pp. 236–281). Routledge.Google Scholar
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D. (2016). The neuroanatomical pathway model of language: Syntactic and semantic networks. In Hickok, G. & Small, S. S. (Eds.), Neurobiology of language (349–356). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186–204.Google Scholar
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R., Young, S. E., Rhea, S. A., & Hewitt, J. K. (2016). Stability and change in executive function abilities from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal twin study. Developmental Psychology, 52(2), 326–340.Google Scholar
Frishkoff, G. A., Perfetti, C. A., & Collins-Thompson, K. (2010). Lexical quality in the brain: ERP evidence for robust word learning from context. Developmental Neuropsychology 35(4), 376–403.Google Scholar
Frost, R. (2005). Orthographic systems and skilled word recognition. In Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C. (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 272–295). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1293–1326.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Siegelman, N., Narkiss, A., & Afek, L. (2013). What predicts successful literacy acquisition in a second language. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1243–1252.Google Scholar
Fry, E. B. (1989). Reading formulas: Maligned but valid. Journal of Reading, 32, 292–297.Google Scholar
Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M., & Jenkins, J. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.Google Scholar
Fukkink, R., & De Glopper, K. (1998). Effects of instruction in deriving word meanings from context: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 68, 450–469.Google Scholar
Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132.Google Scholar
Fuligni, A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2004). Early childhood intervention in family literacy programs. In Wasik, B. (Ed.), Handbook of family literacy (pp. 117–136). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Galbraith, D., & Baaijen, V. (2018). The work of writing: Raiding the inarticulate. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 238–257Google Scholar
Ganske, K. (2019). Best practices in vocabulary instruction. In Morrow, L. M. & Gambrell, L. B. (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (6th ed., pp. 199–220). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Garas-York, K., & Almasi, J. F. (2017). Constructing meaning through discussion. In Israel, S. E. (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 500–518). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. (2007). Validating the construct of word in applied corpus-based vocabulary research: A critical survey. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 241–265.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. (2013). Exploring vocabulary: Language in action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2007). Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 339–359.Google Scholar
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). The New Academic Vocabulary List. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305–327.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. (2010). Second language acquisition: A social psychological perspective. In Kaplan, R. B. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 204–216). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gascoine, L., Higgins, S., & Wall, K. (2017). The assessment of metacognition in children aged 4–16 years: A systematic review. Review of Education, 5, 3–57.Google Scholar
Gaskins, I. (2005). Success with struggling readers: The Benchmark School approach. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gaskins, I., & Elliot, T. (1991). Implementing cognitive strategy instruction across the school: The benchmark manual for teachers. Brookline Books.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., Geva, E., Dressler, C., & Kamil, M. (2006). Synthesis: Cross-linguistic relationships. In August, D. & Shanahan, T. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Panel on Language Minority Children and Youth (pp. 153–183). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Georgiou, G. K., & Das, J. P. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of executive function on reading comprehension in young adults. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 243–258.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 25, 265–304.Google Scholar
Geva, E., & Farnia, F. (2012). Developmental changes in the nature of language proficiency and reading fluency paint a more complex view of reading comprehension in ELL and EL1. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1819–1845.Google Scholar
Geva, E., & Genesee, F. (2006). First-language oral proficiency and second language literacy. In August, D. & Shanahan, T. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth (pp. 185–195). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Geva, E., & Wang, M. (2001). The development of basic reading skills in children: A cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 182–204.Google Scholar
Gholamain, M., & Geva, E. (1999). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in English and Persian. Language Learning, 49(2), 183–217.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30, 5–55.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1995). Coherence in text vs. coherence in mind. In Gernsbacher, M. A. & Givón, T. (Eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text (pp. 59–115). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, C. (2013). Unlocking the research on ELs: What we know – and don’t yet know – about effective instruction. American Educator, 32(2), 4–11.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, C. (2020). Reading wars, reading science, and English learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), 131–144.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, C., & Gallimore, R. (1991). Local knowledge, research knowledge, and educational change: A case study of early Spanish reading improvement. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 2–14.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, C., Rueda, R., & August, D. (2006a). Synthesis: Sociocultural contexts and literacy development. In August, D. & Shanahan, T. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second language learning (pp. 249–267). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, C., Rueda, R., & August, D. (2006b). Sociocultural influences on the literacy attainment of language-minority children and youth. In August, D. & Shanahan, T. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second language learning (pp. 269–318). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadows, S., Levine, S. C., Hedges, L. V., Huttenlocher, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Small, S. L. (2014). New evidence about language and cognitive development based on a longitudinal study. American Psychologist, 69(6), 588–599.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C., & Brodowinska, K. (2012). Comprehending and learning from Internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 356–381.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R., & George, M. (2019). What are we reading for? A disciplinary literacy perspective on purpose. In Millis, K., Long, D. L., Magliano, J. P., & Wiemer, K. (Eds.), Deep comprehension (pp. 80–95). Routledge.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R., Golden, R., & van den Broek, P. (2007). Why are computational models of text comprehension useful? In Schmalhofer, F. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain (pp. 27–51). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R., & Rakestraw, J. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing learning from text. In Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285–310). Longman.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R., Snow, C. E., & Vaughn, S. (2016). Common themes in teaching reading for understanding: Lessons from three projects. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 60(3), 255–264.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Hoff, E., Rowe, M. L., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2019). Language matters: Denying the existence of the 30–million–word gap has serious consequences. Child Development, 90(3), 985–992.Google Scholar
Goodrich, J. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2017). Language-independent and language-specific aspects of early literacy: An evaluation of the common underlying proficiency model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 782–793.Google Scholar
Goodwin, A. P., August, D., & Calderon, M. (2015). Reading in multiple orthographies: Differences and similarities in reading in Spanish and English for English learners. Language Learning, 65(3), 596–630.Google Scholar
Goodwin, A. P., Petschur, Y., Carlisle, J. F., & Mitchell, A. M. (2017). Exploring the dimensionality of morphological knowledge for adolescent readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 91–117.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, G., & Taguchi, E. (2008). Repeated reading for developing reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of FL learners in Vietnam. System, 36, 253–278.Google Scholar
Gough, P., Hoover, W., & Peterson, C. (1996). Some observations on the Simple View of Reading. In Cornoldi, C. & Oakhill, J. (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties (pp. 1–13). L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gough, P., & Wren, S. (1999). Constructing meaning: The role of decoding. In Oakhill, J. & Beard, R. (Eds.), Reading development and the teaching of reading (pp. 59–78). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (1997). Discourse analysis and reading instruction. In Miller, T. (Ed.), Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications (pp. 2–15). United States Information Agency.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (2000). Reading research and its implications for reading assessment. In Kunnan, A. (Ed.), Fairness and validation in language assessment (Studies in Language Testing 9, pp. 226–262). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (2002). Narrative and expository macro-genres. In Johns, A. (Ed.) Genre in the classroom (pp. 236–258). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (2003). Using discourse representations for reading development. In Swanson, M. & Hill, K. (Eds.), Proceeding of the 2002 JALT Conference (pp. 9–17). JALT Publications.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (2005). The role of grammar in reading comprehension. In Frodesen, J. & Holton, C. (Eds.), The power of context in language teaching and learning (pp. 268–282). Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Grabe, W., & Jiang, X. (2014). Reading assessment. In Kunnan, A. (Ed.), Companion to language assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 185–201). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Reading to learn: Why and how content-based instructional frameworks facilitate the process. In Koda, K. & Yamashita, J. (Eds.), Reading to learn in a foreign language (pp. 9–29). Routledge.Google Scholar
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2020). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2023). Principles for reading instruction. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of second language teaching and learning. Routledge.Google Scholar
Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2013). Reading and writing together: A critical component of English for academic purposes teaching and learning. TESOL Journal, 4(1), 9–24.Google Scholar
Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2016). Reading–writing relationships in first and second language academic literacy development. Language Teaching, 49(3), 339–355.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., & Britton, B. (1996). Five metaphors for text understanding. In Britton, B. & Graesser, A. (Eds.), Models for understanding text (pp. 341–351). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Li, H., & Feng, S. (2015). Constructing inferences in naturalistic reading contexts. In O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Lorch, R. F., Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 290–320). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Swamer, S., Baggett, W., & Sell, M. (1996). New models for deep comprehension. In Britton, B. & Grasser, A. C. (Eds.), Models for understanding text (pp. 1–32). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2020). The sciences of reading and writing must become more fully integrated. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), 35–44.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Harris, K. H., & Santangelo, T. (2015). Research-based writing practices and the Common Core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Elementary School Journal, 115, 498–522.Google Scholar
Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 710–744. www.researchgate.net/publication/279741659Google Scholar
Graham, S., Kiuhara, S., & Mackay, M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Kiuhara, S., McKeown, D., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Liu, X., Aitken, A., et al. (2018). Effectiveness of literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction: A meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 279–304.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Liu, X., Bartlett, B., et al. (2018). Reading for writing: A meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions on writing. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 243–284.Google Scholar
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing for adolescents in middle and high school. Alliance for Excellent Education. www.carnegie.org/publications/writing–next–effective–strategies–to–improve–writing–ofadolescents–in–middle–and–high–schools/Google Scholar
Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writer? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing, 27, 1703–1743.Google Scholar
Graves, M. F. (2016). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Graves, M. F., August, D., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2013). Teaching vocabulary to English language learners. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Greaney, V. (1980). Factors related to amount and type of leisure time reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 337–357.Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L., & D’Silva, R. A. (2017). Second language literacy: Kindergarten to grade 12. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol III, pp. 273–285). Routledge.Google Scholar
Guo, Y., & Roehrig, A. D. (2011). Roles of general versus second language (L2) knowledge in L2 reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23(1), 42–64.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T. (1988). Locating information in documents: Examination of a cognitive model. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 178–199.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., & Cox, K. (2001). Motivational and cognitive contributions to students’ amounts of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 116–131Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., & Humenick, N. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In McCardle, P. & Chhabra, V. (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329–354). Brookes Publishers.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., & Kirsch, I. (1987). Literacy as multidimensional: Locating information in text and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 220–228.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387–416.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2016). Engagement and motivational processes in reading. In Afflerbach, P. (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading (pp. 41–53). Routledge.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Ho, A. N. (2013). Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 9–26.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A. C., & Klauda, S. L. (2007). Contributions of Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivation in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 237–250.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., & Ozgungor, S. (2002). Instructional contexts for reading engagement. In Block, C. & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 275–288). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., & Taboada-Barber, A. M. (2019). Best practices in motivating students to read. In Morrow, L. M. & Gambrell, L. B. (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (6th ed., pp. 52–72). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N., Perencevich, K., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 232–245.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. (Eds.). (2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction (pp. 55–86). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601–634). Springer Science+Business media.Google Scholar
Guzzetti, B., Snyder, T., Glass, G., & Gamas, W. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis or instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 116–159.Google Scholar
Hacker, D. J. (2014). Failures to detect textual problems during reading. In Rapp, D. N. & Braasch, J. L. G. (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information (pp. 73–92). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hagen, A. M., Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2014). Relationships between spontaneous note-taking, self-reported strategies and comprehension when reading multiple texts in different task conditions. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(S1), S141–S157.Google Scholar
Halle, T., Forry, N. Hair, E., et al. (2009). Disparities in early learning and development: Lessons from the Early Childhood, Longitudinal Study–Birth Cohort (ECLS–B). Child Trends.Google Scholar
Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamada, M., & Koda, K. (2008). Influence of first language orthographic experience on second language decoding and word learning. Language Learning, 58(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
Hamilton, L. G., Hayiou-Thomas, M. E., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2016). The home literacy environment as a predictor of the early literacy development of children at family-risk of dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(5), 401–419.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. (1997). Psychological representation of concepts. In Conway, M. (Ed.), Cognitive models of memory (pp. 81–110). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hanley, J. R. (2005). Learning to read in Chinese. In Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C. (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 316–335). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harm, M., & Seidenberg, M. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662–720.Google Scholar
Harris, J., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2011). Lessons from the crib for the classroom: How children really learn vocabulary. In Neuman, S. B. & Dickinson, D. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 49–65). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Harris, L. N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017). Individual differences in phonological feedback effects: Evidence for the orthographic recoding hypothesis of orthographic learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(1), 31–45.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1999). The social world of children learning to talk. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995/2002). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children (2nd ed.). Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (2003). The early catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by age 3. American Educator, 27(1), 4–9.Google Scholar
Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher 59(7), 636–644.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, B., & Egbert, J. (2019). More than frequency? Exploring predictors of word difficulty for second language learners. Language Learning, 69(4), 839–872.Google Scholar
He, Y., Wang, Q., & Anderson, R. C. (2005). Chinese children’s use of subcharacter information about pronunciation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 572–579.Google Scholar
Head Start. (2005). Head Start impact study: First year findings. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Head Start Program Facts. (2018). https://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/no–search/hs–program–fact–sheet–2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hebbecker, K., Forster, N., & Souvignier, E. (2019). Reciprocal effects between reading achievement and intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(5), 419–436.Google Scholar
Hebert, M., Bohaty, J. J., Nelson, J. R., & Brown, J. (2016). The effect of text structure instruction on expository reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 609–629.Google Scholar
Hebert, M., Bohaty, J. J., Nelson, J. R., & Lambert, M. C. (2018). Identifying and discriminating expository text structures: An experiment with 4th and 5th grade struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 2115–2145.Google Scholar
Hedgcock, J. S., & Ferris, D. R. (2018). Teaching readers of English: Students, texts, and contexts (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Heimlich, J. E., & Pittelman, S. D. (1986). Semantic mapping: Classroom applications. International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Helder, A., Perfetti, C. A., van den Broek, P., Stafura, J. Z., & Calloway, R. C. (2019). ERP indicators of local and global text influences on word-to-text integration. Language, Cognition and Neurosciences, 34(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
Helms-Park, R., Dronjic, V., & Tucker, S.-K. (2016). From proto-writing to multimedia literacy. In Chen, X., Dronjic, V., & Helms-Park, R. (Eds.), Reading in a second language: Cognitive and psycholinguistic issues (pp. 1–31). Routledge.Google Scholar
Herbet, G., Zemmoura, I., & Duffau, H. (2018). Functional anatomy of the inferior longitudinal fasciculus: From historical reports to current hypotheses. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 12(article 77, September 19). www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnana.2018.00077/fullGoogle Scholar
Hessel, A. K., Nation, K., & Murphy, V. A. (2021). Comprehension monitoring during reading: An eye-tracking with children learning English as an additional language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(2), 159–178.Google Scholar
Hiebert, E. H. (Ed.). (2009). Revisiting silent reading. International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Hiebert, E. H., & Daniel, M. (2019). Comprehension and rate during silent reading: Why do some readers do poorly? Reading and Writing, 32, 1795–1818.Google Scholar
Hiebert, E. H., & Reutzel, D. R. (Eds.). (2010). Reading more, reading better. International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Hindman, A. H., Skibbe, L. E., & Foster, T. D. (2014). Exploring the variety of parental talk during shared book reading and its contributions to preschool language and literacy: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study–Birth Cohort. Reading and Writing, 27, 287–313.Google Scholar
Hipfner-Boucher, K., & Chen, X. (2016). Cross-language transfer or metalinguistic and cognitive skills in second language learning. In Chen, X., Dronjic, V., & Helms-Park, R. (Eds.), Reading in a second language: Cognitive and psycholinguistics issues (pp. 99–132). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hipfner-Boucher, K., Lam, K., & Chen, X. (2014). The effects of bilingual education on the English language and literacy outcomes of Chinese-speaking children. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 116–138.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., et al. (2015). The contribution of early communication quality to low-income children’s language success. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1071–1083.Google Scholar
Hirvela, A. R. (2016). Connecting reading & writing in second language writing instruction (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, J., Dimino, J., Kurki, A., Wilkins, C., & Gersten, R. (2010). The impact of collaborative strategic reading on the reading comprehension of grade 5 students in linguistically diverse schools. National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Educational Sciences.Google Scholar
Hjetland, H. N., Brinchmann, E. I., Scherer, R., Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2020). Preschool pathways to reading comprehension: A systemic meta-analytic review. Educational Research Review, 30, 100323.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2003). The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74, 1368–1378.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2006). Environmental supports for language acquisition. In Dickinson, D. & Neuman, S. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy development (Vol. 2, pp, 163–172). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2013). Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: Implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 4–14.Google Scholar
Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., Rumiche, R., Señor, M., & Parra, M. (2012). Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 39, 1–27.Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginzberg, E. (1991). Mother–child conversation in different social classes and communicative settings. Child Development, 62, 782–796.Google Scholar
Hoover, W., & Gough, P. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160.Google Scholar
Horiba, Y. (2000). Reader control in reading: Effects of language competence, text type, and task. Discourse Processes, 29, 223–267.Google Scholar
Horst, M. (2005). Learning L2 vocabulary through extensive reading: A measurement study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 355–382.Google Scholar
Huffman, J. (2014). Reading rate gains during a one-semester extensive reading course. Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(2), 17–33.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129–140.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2015a). Explaining phenomena of first and second language acquisition with the constructs of implicit and explicit learning. In Rebuschat, P. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 25–46). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2015b). Language proficiency and native and non-native speakers. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H., Vasilyeva, M., & Vevea, J., & Hedges, L. V. (2010). Sources of variability in children’s language growth. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 343–365.Google Scholar
Hyerle, D. (1996). Visual tools for constructing knowledge. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2002). Genre, language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 113–135.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Shaw, P. (2016). The Routledge handbook of English for Academic Purposes. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyönä, J. (2015). Are polymorphic words processed differently from other words during reading? In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 114–128). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Israel, S. E. (Ed.). (2017). Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Janzen, J. (2001). Strategic reading on a sustained content theme. In Murphy, J. & Byrd, P. (Eds.), Understanding the courses we teach: Local perspectives on English language teaching (pp. 369–389). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Janzen, J. (2010). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1010–1038.Google Scholar
Jared, D., Cormier, P., Levy, B. A., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2011). Early predictors of biliteracy development in children in French immersion: A 4-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 119–139.Google Scholar
Jeon, E. H. (2011). Contribution of morphological awareness to second-language reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 217–235.Google Scholar
Jeon, E. H. (2012). Oral reading fluency in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(2), 186–208.Google Scholar
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 64(1), 160–212.Google Scholar
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2021). Measuring L2 reading. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, T. (Eds). The Routledge handbook of SLA and language testing (pp. 265–274). Routledge.Google Scholar
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2022). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: An updated meta-analysis of correlation coefficients. In Jeon, E. H. & In’nami, Y. (Eds.), Understanding L2 proficiency: Theoretical and meta-analytic investigation (pp. 29–86). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jiang, X. (2012). Effects of discourse structure graphic organizers on EFL reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(1), 84–105.Google Scholar
Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2007). Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings and issues. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19, 34–55.Google Scholar
Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2009). Building reading abilities with graphic organizers. In Cohen, R. (Ed.), Teaching reading (pp. 25–42). TESOL.Google Scholar
Jiang, X., Sawaki, Y., & Sabatini, J. (2012). Word reading efficiency, text reading fluency, and reading comprehension among Chinese learners of English. Reading Psychology, 33, 323–349.Google Scholar
Joh, J., & Plakans, L. (2017). Working memory in L2 reading comprehension: The influence of prior knowledge. System, 70, 107–120.Google Scholar
Johns, A. (1997). Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johns, A. (2005). English for academic purposes: Issues in undergraduate writing and reading. In Bruthiaux, P., Atkinson, D., Eggington, W. G., Grabe, W., & Ramanathan, V. (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics (pp. 101–116). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Johns, A. (2016). The Common Core in the United States: A major shift in standards and assessments. In Hyland, K. & Shaw, P. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 461–476). Routledge.Google Scholar
Jorm, A., & Share, D. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 103–147.Google Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 137–166.Google Scholar
Kahn-Horwitz, J., Shimron, J., & Sparks, R. (2005). Predicting foreign language achievement in elementary school students. Reading and Writing, 18, 527–558.Google Scholar
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2018). Cognitive load and expertise reversal. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. A., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 793–811). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kame’enui, E. J., & Baumann, J. F. (Eds.). (2012). Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. B. (2005). Contrastive rhetoric. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 375–391). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kavanaugh, L. (2019). Relations between children’s reading motivation, activity and performance at the end of primary school. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(3–4), 562–582.Google Scholar
Ke, S., Miller, R. T., Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2020). Crosslinguistic sharing of morphological awareness in biliteracy development: A systematic review and meta-analysis of correlation coefficients. Language Learning, 71(1), 8–54.Google Scholar
Keck, C. (2014). Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 4–22.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(3), 281–300.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T. (2018). Professional writing expertise. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. A., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 413–430). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendeou, P. (2020). The assessment of reading for understanding. In Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., Cervetti, G. N., & Berman, A. I. (Eds.), Reaping the rewards of the Reading for Understanding initiative (pp. 67–141). National Academy of Education. https://naeducation.org/reaping–the–rewards–of–reading–for–understanding–initiative/Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., & Fulton, S. (2011). What have we been missing: The role of goals in reading comprehension. In McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 375–394). Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., & Christ, T. J. (2016). Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brian Sciences, 3(1), 62–69.Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). The Knowledge Revision Components (KReC) framework: Processes and mechanisms. In Rapp, D. N. & Braasch, J. L. G. (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information (pp. 353–377). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E. J. (2016). Prior knowledge: Acquisition and revision. In Afflerbach, P. (Ed.), Individual differences in reading (pp. 151–163). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., Helder, A., & Karlsson, J. (2014). A cognitive view of reading comprehension: Implications for reading development. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 29(1), 10–16.Google Scholar
Kern, R. (1994). The role of mental translation in L2 reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 441–461.Google Scholar
Kervin, L., Mantei, J., & Leu, D. J. (2018). Repositioning online reading to a central location in the Language Arts. In Lapp, D. & Fisher, D. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English Language Arts (4th ed., pp. 327–358). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kieffer, M. J. (2011). Converging trajectories: Reading growth in language minority learners and their classmates: Kindergarten to grade 8. American Education Research Journal, 48(5), 1187–1225.Google Scholar
Kieffer, M. J. (2012). Before and after third grade: Longitudinal evidence for the shifting role of socioeconomic status in reading growth. Reading and Writing, 25, 1725–1746.Google Scholar
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in the English reading comprehension of native English, Spanish, Filipino, and Vietnamese speakers. Language Learning, 62(4), 1170–1204.Google Scholar
Kieffer, M. J., Petschur, Y., Proctor, C. P., & Silverman, R. D. (2016). Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? Modeling the contributions of language comprehension skills to reading comprehension in the upper elementary grades. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(6), 436–454.Google Scholar
Kieffer, M. J., & Thompson, K. D. (2018). Hidden progress of multilingual students on NAEP. Educational Researcher, 47(6), 391–398.Google Scholar
Kiili, C., Leu, D. J., Utiriainen, J.,et al. (2018). Reading to learn from online information: Modeling the factor structure. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(3), 304–334.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-S. G. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking the simple view of reading using a Direct and Indirect Effect model of Reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 310–333.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-S. G. (2020). Hierarchical and dynamic relations of language and cognitive skills to reading comprehension: Testing the Direct and Indirect Effects model of Reading (DIER). Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 667–684.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-S. G., Petschur, Y., & Schatschneider, C. (2010). Does growth rate in oral reading fluency matter in predicting reading comprehension achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 652–667.Google Scholar
Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas: (Automated readability index, fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. (No. RBR–8–75). Naval Technical Training Command Millington, TN Research Branch.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction–integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A framework for cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (2012). Psychological models of reading comprehension and their implications for assessment. In Sabatini, J. P., Albro, E. R., & O’Reilly, T. (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how to assess reading ability (pp. 21–38). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (2013). What kind of language statistics must be in long-term memory to make language understanding possible? In Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R., & Rouet, J.-F. (Eds.), Reading – From words to multiple texts (pp. 92–100). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Mangalath, P. (2011). The construction of meaning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 346–370.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., Patel, V. L., & Ericsson, K. A. (1999). The role of long-term working memory in text comprehension. Psychologia, 42, 186–198.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394Google Scholar
Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 310–321.Google Scholar
Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2015). Comparing relations of motivation, engagement, and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading and Writing, 28, 239–269.Google Scholar
Klein, P., & Boscolo, P. (2016). Trends in research on writing as a learning activity. Journal of Writing Research, 7(3), 311–350.Google Scholar
Kline, P., & Walters, C. R. (2016). Evaluating public programs with close substitutes: The case of Head Start. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1795–1848.Google Scholar
Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language. Elementary School Journal, 96, 275–293.Google Scholar
Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (2000). The helping behaviors of fifth graders while using collaborative strategic reading during ESL content classes. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 69–98.Google Scholar
Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Arguelles, M., Hughes, M., & Leftwich, S. (2004). Collaborative Strategic Reading: Real-world lessons from classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 291–302.Google Scholar
Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S., & Boardman, A. (2015). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning disabilities (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S., & Boardman, A., & Swanson, E. (2012). Now we get it! Boosting comprehension with Collaborative Strategic Reading. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 99, 3–21.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (1998). The role of phonemic awareness in L2 reading. Second Language Research,14, 194–215.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (2000). Cross-linguistic variations in L2 morphological awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 297–320.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. In Koda, K. (Ed.), Reading and language learning (pp. 1–44). Special issue of Language Learning Supplement, 57.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (2008). Impacts of prior literacy experience on second language learning to read. In Koda, K. & Zehler, A. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages (pp. 68–96). Routledge.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (2016). Development of word recognition in a second language. In Chen, X., Dronjic, V., & Helms-Park, R. (Eds.), Reading in a second language: Cognitive and psycholinguistic issues (pp. 70–98). Routledge.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (2019). Integrated communication skills approach: Reading to learn as a basis for language and content integration. In Koda, K. & Yamashita, J. (Eds.), Reading to learn in a foreign language: An integrated approach to foreign language instruction and assessment (pp. 30–54). Routledge.Google Scholar
Koda, K., & Yamashita, J. (2018). An integrated approach to foreign language instruction and assessment. In Davis, J. M., Norris, J. M., Malone, M. F., McKay, T. H., & Son, Y.-A. (Eds.), Useful assessment and evaluation in language education (pp. 57–73). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Koda, K., & Yamashita, J. (Eds.) (2019). Reading to learn in a foreign language: An integrated approach to foreign language instruction and assessment. Routledge.Google Scholar
Koedinger, K., Corbett, A., & Perfetti, C. A. (2012). The knowledge–learning–instruction framework: Bridging the science–practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 757–798.Google Scholar
Komiyama, R. (2009). CAR: A means for motivating students to read. English Teaching Forum, 47(3), 32–37.Google Scholar
Komiyama, R. (2013). Factors underlying second language reading motivation of adult EAP students. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25(2), 149–169.Google Scholar
Krall, A., Koornneef, A. W., Saab, N., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Processing of expository and narrative texts by low- and high-comprehending children. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 2017–2040.Google Scholar
Kremmel, B., Brunfaut, T., & Alderson, J. C. (2017). Exploring the role of phraseological knowledge in foreign language reading. Applied Linguistics, 38(6), 848–870.Google Scholar
Kremmel, B., & Harding, L. (2020). Towards a comprehensive, empirical model of language assessment literacy across stakeholder groups: Developing a language assessment literacy survey. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(1), 100–120.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & de Groot, A. (1997). Lexical and conceptual memory in the bilingual: Mapping form to meaning in two languages. In de Groot, A. & Kroll, J. (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 169–199). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Ma, F. (2018). The bilingual lexicon. In Fernandez, E. M. & Smith, H. S. (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 294–319). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Tokowicz, N. (2005). Models of bilingual representation and processing. In. Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. (Eds.) Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 531–553). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, M., & Levy, L. (2015). Developing fluent readers: Teaching fluency as a foundational skill. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, M., & Rasinski, T. (2007). Best practices in fluency instruction In Gambrell, L. B., Morrow, L. M., & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (3rd ed., pp. 204–219). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, M., Rasinski, T., & Young, C. (2019). Best practices in fluency instruction. In. Morrow, L. M. & Gambrell, L. B. (Eds.). Best Practices in Literacy Instruction (6th ed. pp. 271–288). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2017). Reconsidering fluency’s role in reading comprehension. In Israel, S. E. (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed. pp. 316–331). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, M., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 232–253.Google Scholar
Kuo, L. J., & Anderson, R. C. (2008). Conceptual and methodological issues in comparing metalinguistic awareness across languages. In Koda, K. & Zehler, A. M. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages (pp. 39–67). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R. (2013). The proactive comprehender: What event-related potentials tell us about the dynamics of reading comprehension. In Miller, B., Cutting, L. E., & McCardle, P. (Eds.), Unraveling reading comprehension: Behavioral, neurobiological, and genetic components (pp. 176–192). Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2010). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the Event-Related Potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. 1967. Narrative analysis. In Helm, J. (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
LaFlair, G. T. (2020). Duolingo English Test: Subscores. Duolingo research report DRR–20–03. https://duolingo-papers.s3.amazonaws.com/reports/subscore-whitepaper.pdfGoogle Scholar
LaFlair, G. T., & Settles, B. (2020). Duolingo English Test: Technical manual. Duolingo. Retrieved May 30, 2021, from https://duolingo–papers.s3.amazonaws.com/other/det–technical–manual–current.pdfGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. K. (1998). Learning and representing verbal meaning: The latent semantic analysis theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 161–164.Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K. (2007, 2011). LSA as a theory of meaning. In Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 3–34). Lawrence Erlbaum (reprinted 2011 by Routledge).Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.Google Scholar
Landerl, K. H. (2017). Learning to read German. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 299–322). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landerl, K. H., Freudenthaler, H., Heene, M., De Jong, P. F., Desrochers, A., Manolitsis, G., Parrila, R., & Georgiou, G. K. (2019). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming as longitudinal predictors of reading in five alphabetic orthographies with varying degrees of consistency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(3), 220–234.Google Scholar
Landi, N. (2013). Learning to read words: Understanding the relationship between reading ability, lexical quality, and reading context. In Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R., & Rouet, J.-F. (Eds.), Reading – From words to multiple texts (pp. 17–33). Routledge.Google Scholar
Landry, S., Smith, K., Swank, P., Assel, M., & Vellet, S. (2001). Does early responsive parenting have a special importance for children’s development or is consistency across early childhood necessary? Developmental Psychology, 37, 387–403.Google Scholar
Language and Reading Research Consortium (LLRC), & Logan, J. (2017). Pressure points in reading comprehension: A quantile multiple regression analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(4), 451–464.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (2000). Task effect on instructed vocabulary learning: The hypothesis of “involvement.” In Selected Papers from the AILA ‘99 Tokyo (pp. 47–62). Waseda University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, V., & Shipley, E. (1996). Parental speech to middle- and working-class children from two racial groups in three settings. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 233–255.Google Scholar
Lazowski, R. A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2016). Motivation interventions in education: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 602–640.Google Scholar
Lems, K. (2006). Reading fluency and comprehension in adult English language learners. In Rasinski, T. V., Blachowicz, C., & Lems, K. (Eds.), Fluency instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 231–252). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lervåg, A., Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2018). Unpacking the developmental relationship between oral language skills and reading comprehension: It’s simple, but complex. Child Development, 89(5), 1821–1838.Google Scholar
Lesaux, N., Koda, K., Siegal, L., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Development of literacy. In August, D. & Shanahan, T. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners (pp. 75–122). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Leseman, P., & De Jong, P. (1998). Home literacy: Opportunity, instruction, cooperation and social-emotional quality predicting early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 294–318.Google Scholar
Leseman, P., & van Tujil, C. (2006). Cultural diversity in early literacy Findings in Dutch studies. In Dickinson, D. & Neuman, S. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 211–228). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37–59.Google Scholar
Leung, C., Davison, C., East, M., et al. (2018). Using assessment to promote learning: Clarifying constructs, theories, and practices. In Davis, J. M., Norris, J. M., Malone, M. F., McKay, T. H., & Son, Y.-A. (Eds.), Useful assessment and evaluation in language education (pp. 75–91). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337.Google Scholar
Levi, T., & Inbar-Lourie, O. (2020). Assessment literacy or language assessment literacy: Learning from the teachers. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(2), 168–182.Google Scholar
Li, P., & Clariana, R. B. (2019). Reading comprehension in L1 and L2: An integrative approach. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 94–105.Google Scholar
Li, Y., & Casanave, C. (2012). Two first year students’ strategies for writing from sources: Patchwriting or plagiarism. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 165–180.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (2019). Perfecting practice. Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 703–712.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., Halter, R., White, J., & Horst, M. (2002). Comprehension-based learning: The limits of ‘do it yourself’. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 427–464.Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 21, 861–883.Google Scholar
Linderholm, T., & van den Broek, P. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 778–784.Google Scholar
Linderholm, T., Kwon, H., & Wang, X. (2011). The effect of reading purpose on advanced readers. In McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 197–222). Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. (2020). Intentional L2 vocabulary learning. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary learning (pp. 240–254). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lin-Siegler, X., Ahn, J. N., Chen, J., Fang, F.-F. A., & Luna-Lucero, M. (2016). Even Einstein struggled: Effects of learning about great scientists’ struggles on high school students’ motivation to learn science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 314–326.Google Scholar
Lin-Siegler, X., Dweck, C. S., & Cohen, G. L. (2016). Introduction: Instructional interventions that motivate classroom learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 295–299.Google Scholar
Logan, G. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13, 123–146.Google Scholar
Logan, G. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376–400.Google Scholar
Long, D., Johns, C., & Morris, P. (2006). Comprehension ability in mature readers. In Traxler, M. & Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 801–833). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R., & Kramsch, C. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lonigan, C. J. (2004). Emergent literacy skills and family literacy. In Wasik, B. (Ed.), Handbook of family literacy (pp. 57–82). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., & Schatschneider, C. (2018). Examining the simple view of reading with elementary school children: Still simple after all these years. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 260–273.Google Scholar
Lopes, J., Spear-Swerling, L., Oliveira, C., Velasquez, M. G., & Zibulsky, J. (2014). Actual disciplinary knowledge, perceived disciplinary knowledge, teaching experience and teachers’ training for reading instruction: A study with primary Portuguese and American teachers. Revista de Psicodidactica, 19, 45–65.Google Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr. (1995). Integration of topic information during reading. In Lorch, R. F., Jr. & O’Brien, E. (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 279–294). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr. (2015). What about expository text? In O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Lorch, R. F., Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 348–361). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr. (2017). What is so difficult about expository text? In León, J. A. & Escudero, I. (Eds.), Reading comprehension in educational settings (pp. 145–167). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Lorch, E. (1995). Effects of organizational signals on text-processing strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 537–544.Google Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Lorch, E. (1996). Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 38–48.Google Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E., & Inman, W. (1993). Effects of signaling topic structure on text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 281–290.Google Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Jr., & van den Broek, P. (1997). Understanding reading comprehension: Current and future contributions of cognitive science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 213–246.Google Scholar
Luo, L., & Kiewra, K. A. (2019). Soaring to successful synthesis writing: An investigation of SOAR strategies for college students writing from multiple sources. Journal of Language Research, 11(1), 299–345.Google Scholar
Lyster, S. A. H., Lervåg, A. O., & Hulme, C. (2016). Preschool morphological training produces long–term improvements in reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 29, 1269–1288.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M., & Seidenberg, M. (2006). Constraint satisfaction accounts of lexical and sentence comprehension. In Traxler, M. & Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 581–611). Academic Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2018). Introduction: Language emergence. In MacWhinney, B. & O’Grady, W. (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 1–31). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & O’Grady, W. (Eds.). (2018). The handbook of language emergence. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Madda, C. L., Griffo, V. B., Pearson, P. D., & Raphael, T. E. (2019). Current issues and best practices in literacy instruction. In. Morrow, L. M. & Gambrell, L. B. (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (6th ed., pp. 27–51). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Malone, J. (2018). Incidental vocabulary learning in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 651–675.Google Scholar
Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Predictors of reading comprehension for struggling readers: The case of Spanish-speaking language minority students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 701–711.Google Scholar
Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2017). Early indicators of later English reading comprehension outcomes among children from Spanish-speaking homes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(5), 428–448.Google Scholar
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Bronnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68.Google Scholar
Manoli, P., Papadopoulu, M., & Metallidou, P. (2016). Investigating the immediate and delayed effects of multiple-reading strategy instruction in primary EFL classrooms. System, 56, 54–65.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science, 11, F9–F16.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., Fernald, A., & Hurtado, N. (2010). How vocabulary size in two languages relates to efficiency in spoken word recognition by young Spanish–English bilinguals. Journal of Child Language, 37(4), 817–840.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1993). Genre and literacy – Modeling contexts in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 141–172.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (2000). Design and practice: Enacting functional linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 116–126.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (2002). Meaning beyond the clause: SFL perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 52–74.Google Scholar
Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 379–413.Google Scholar
Martin, K. I., Lawson, E., Carpenter, K., & Hummer, E. (2020). English word and pseudoword spellings and phonological awareness: Detail comparisons from three L1 writing systems. Frontiers of Psychology, 11, 1309–1328.Google Scholar
Martínez, I., Mateos, M., Martin, E., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2015). Learning history by composing synthesis texts: Effects of an instructional programme on learning, reading and writing processes, and text quality. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 275–302.Google Scholar
Marulis, L. M., & Neuman, S. B. (2010). The effects of vocabulary intervention on young children’s word learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 300–335.Google Scholar
Marzec-Stawiarska, M. (2016). The influence of summary writing on the development of reading skills in a foreign language. System, 59, 90–99.Google Scholar
Mason, R., & Just, M. (2006). Neuroimaging contributions to the understanding of discourse processes. In Traxler, M. & Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 765–799). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D., Prislin, R., McKenzie, T., Rodríguez, J., & Kayzar, B. (2002). Evaluating evaluations: The case of parent involvement programs. Review of Educational Research, 72(4), 549–576.Google Scholar
McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Language learning as language use: A cross-linguistic model of child language development. Psychological Review, 126, 1–51.Google Scholar
McCauley, S. M., Isbilen, E. S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). Chunking ability shapes sentence processing at multiple levels of abstraction. Cognitive Science, 41, 2681–2686.Google Scholar
McClelland, J., Botvinick, M., Noelle, D., et al. (2010). Letting structure emerge: Connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 348–356.Google Scholar
McClelland, J., & Elman, J. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.Google Scholar
McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (2010). Exploring how relevance instructions affect personal reading intentions, reading goals and text processing: A mixed methods study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 229–241.Google Scholar
McCutchen, D. (2013). Teachers in the know: Links between teachers’ phonological knowledge and students’ literacy learning. In Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R., & Rouet, J.-F. (Eds.), Reading – From words to multiple texts (pp. 52–71). Routledge.Google Scholar
McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., et al. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69–86.Google Scholar
McCutchen, D., Green, L. B., Abbott, R. D., & Sanders, E. (2009). Further evidence for teacher knowledge: Supporting struggling readers in grades three through five. Reading and Writing, 22, 401–423.Google Scholar
McDaniel, M., Blischak, D., & Einstein, G. (1995). Understanding the special mnemonic characteristics of fairy tales. In Weaver, C., Mannes, S., & Fletcher, C. (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 157–176). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McDaniel, M., & Einstein, G. (1989). Material appropriate processing: A contextualistic approach to reading and study strategies. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 113–145.Google Scholar
McDaniel, M., Einstein, G., Dunay, P., & Cobb, R. (1986). Encoding difficulty and memory: Toward a unifying theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 645–656.Google Scholar
McDonough, K., Crawford, W. J., & De Vleeschauwer, J. (2014). Summary writing in a Thai EFL context. Journal of Second Language Writing, 24(1), 20–32.Google Scholar
McGeown, S. P., Duncan, L. G., Griffiths, Y. M., & Stothard, S. E. (2015). Exploring the relationship between adolescents’ reading skills, reading motivation, and reading habits. Reading and Writing, 28, 545–569.Google Scholar
McGeown, S. P., Osborne, C., Warhurst, A., Norgate, R., & Duncan, L. G. (2016). Understanding children’s reading activities: Reading motivation, skill and child characteristics as predictors. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(1), 109–125.Google Scholar
McKay, T. H., & Plonsky, L. (2021). Reliability analyses: Estimating error. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and language testing (pp. 468–482). Routledge.Google Scholar
McKenna, M. C., Conradi, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B. G., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a U.S. survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 283–306.Google Scholar
McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 934–956.Google Scholar
McKeown, M. G. (2019). Effective vocabulary instruction fosters knowing words, using words, and understanding how words work. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(4), 466–476.Google Scholar
McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218–253.Google Scholar
McKeown, M. G., Crosson, A. C., Beck, I. L., & Moore, D. W. (2018). Word knowledge and comprehension effects of an academic vocabulary intervention for middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 55, 572–616.Google Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (2015). Cognitive theories in discourse-processing research. In O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Lorch, R. F., Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 42–67). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McLean, S. (2021). The coverage comprehension model, its importance to pedagogy and research, and threats to the validity with which it is operationalized. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33(1), 126–140.Google Scholar
McLean, S., & Roualt, G. (2017). The effectiveness and efficiency of extensive reading at developing reading rates. System, 70(1), 92–106.Google Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2011). Cross-linguistic transfer of oral language, decoding, phonological awareness and reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(1), 114–135.Google Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Lervåg, A. (2014). Reading comprehension and its underlying components in second-language learners: A meta-analysis of studies comparing first- and second-language learners. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 409–433.Google Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S.-A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 322–352.Google Scholar
Metsala, J. L., & David, M. D. (2016). Individual differences in word recognition. In Afflerbach, P. (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading (pp. 93–119). Routledge.Google Scholar
Meuter, R. (2005). Language selection in bilingualism. In Kroll, J. & de Groot, A (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 349–370). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F. (1985). Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems. In Britton, B. & Black, J. (Eds.), Analyzing and understanding expository text (pp. 11–64, 269–304). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F., & Poon, L. W. (2001). Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 127–152.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F., & Wijekumar, K. K. (2017). Intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy: A reading strategy tutor. In Crossley, S. A. & McNamara, D. S. (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 82–103). Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F., Wijekumar, K. K., & Lei, P. (2018). Comparative signaling generated for expository texts by 4th–8th graders: Variations by text structure, strategy instruction, comprehension skill, and signal word. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 1937–1968.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F., Wijekumar, K. K., & Lin, Y.-C. (2011). Individualizing a web-based structure strategy intervention for fifth graders’ comprehension of non-fiction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 140–168.Google Scholar
Millis, K., Long, D. L., Magliano, J. P., & Wiemer, K. (Eds.). (2019). Deep comprehension. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mislevy, R. J., & Sabatini, J. P. (2012). How research on reading and research on assessment are transforming reading assessment (or if they aren’t, how they ought to). In Sabatini, J. P., Albro, E. R. & O’Reilly, T. (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how to assess reading ability (pp. 119–134). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning, 62(1), 302–331.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science 21(1), 8–14.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, A., Pfost, M., & Artelt, C. (2018). Reciprocal relations between intrinsic reading motivation and reading competence: A comparison between native and immigrant students in Germany. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(1), 176–196.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, A., Pfost, M., & Artelt, C. (2019). The relation between intrinsic motivation and reading comprehension: Mediating effects of reading amount and metacognitive knowledge of strategy use. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(6), 445–460.Google Scholar
Mohamed, A. A. (2018). Exposure frequency in L2 reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 269–293.Google Scholar
Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296.Google Scholar
Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G., De Jong, M. T., & Smeets, D. J. H. (2008). Added value of dialog parent–child book readings: A meta-analysis. Early Education and Development, 19, 7–26.Google Scholar
Moore, T., Morton, J., Hall, D., & Wallis, C. (2015). Literacy practices in the professional workplace: Implications for the IELTS reading and writing tests. IELTS Research reports Online Series, 1, 1–46.Google Scholar
Mori, S. (2002). Redefining motivation to read in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14, 91–110.Google Scholar
Morris, R. (2006). Lexical processing and sentence context effects. In Traxler, M. & Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 377–401). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mosenthal, P., & Kirsch, I. (1989–1993). Understanding documents. Journal of Reading, 33–36 (31 issues). (October 1989 to April, 1993.)Google Scholar
Muljani, M., Koda, K., & Moates, D. (1998). The development of L2 word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 99–114.Google Scholar
Munger, K. A., & Murray, M. S. (2014). Text complexity and deliberate practice: Common cores of learning. In Hinchman, K. A. & Sheridan-Thomas, H. K. (Eds.), Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction (pp. 99–119). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, L. A., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 740–764.Google Scholar
Nag, S., Caravolas, M., & Snowling, M. J. (2011). Beyond alphabetic processes: Literacy and its acquisition in the alphasyllabic languages. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 615–622.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E. (2005). Why vocabulary instruction needs to be long-term and comprehensive. In Hiebert, E. H. & Kamil, M. L. (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary (pp. 27–44). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary–comprehension connection. In Wagner, R., Muse, A., & Tannenbaum, K. (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–77). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, C. R. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Carlisle, J. F., & Goodwin, A. P. (2014). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 3–12.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(2), 233–253.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269–284). Longman.Google Scholar
Nakamoto, J., Lindsey, K. A., & Manis, F. R. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English language learners’ word decoding and reading comprehension, Reading and Writing, 20(7), 691–719.Google Scholar
Nakanishi, T. (2015). A meta-analysis of extensive reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 6–37.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2003). L2 vocabulary learning from context: Strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 645–670.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2014). The role and importance of lower-level processes in second language reading. Language Teaching, 47(1), 1–37.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59–82.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2014). How much input do you need to learn the most frequent 9,000 words? Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Waring, R. (2020). Teaching extensive reading in another language. Routledge.Google Scholar
NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress). (2017). NAEP reading report card. www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_2017/nation/gaps?grade=4Google Scholar
NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress). (2020). NAEP 2019 report card: Reading. www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading?grade=4Google Scholar
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2019). Student enrollment in K–12. (59.4 million) https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_csa.aspGoogle Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). K–12 school enrollment data. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/ataglance.aspGoogle Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics, Programs, Digest. (2016). Free lunch data. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_204.10.aspGoogle Scholar
NCTQ (National Council on Teacher Quality). (2006). What education schools aren’t teaching about reading and what elementary teachers aren’t learning. National Council on Teacher Quality.Google Scholar
NGA–CCSSO (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers). (2010). The Common Core Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social sciences, science, and technical subjects. www.corestandards.org/ELA–LiteracyGoogle Scholar
NRP (National Reading Panel). (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (National Institute for Health Pub. No. 00–4769). National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar
Netton, A., Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2011). Predictors of reading literacy for first and second language learners. Reading and Writing, 24, 413–425.Google Scholar
Netton, A., Luyton, H., Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Role of linguistic and sociocultural diversity in reading literacy achievement: A multilevel approach. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(2), 189–208.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, S. R., & Gilmour, A. F. (2020). The ups and downs of reading across content areas: The association between instruction and fluctuations in reading motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 344–363.Google Scholar
Neuman, S. B. (2006). The knowledge gap: Implications for early education. In Dickinson, D. K. & Neuman, S. B. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 29–40). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ng, S., Payne, B. R., Steen, A. A., Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2017). Use of contextual information and prediction by struggling adult readers: Evidence from reading times and event-related potentials. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(5), 359–375.Google Scholar
Nicholson, T., & Tan, A. (1999). Proficient word identification for comprehension. In Thompson, G. B. & Nicholson, T. (Eds.), Learning to read: Beyond phonics and whole language (pp. 150–173). Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
NICHD. (2005). Pathways to reading: The role of oral language in the transition to reading. Developmental Psychology, 41, 428–442.Google Scholar
Niklas, F., & Schneider, W. (2015). With a little help: Improving kindergarten children’s vocabulary by enhancing the home literacy environment. Reading and Writing, 28, 491–508.Google Scholar
Noels, K. (2001). New orientations in language learning motivation: Toward a contextual model of intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientation and motivation. In Dörnyei, Z. & Schmidt, R. (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 43–68). University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Noels, K., Pelletier, L., Clement, R, & Vallerand, R. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50, 57–85.Google Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.Google Scholar
Nouwens, S., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). How storage and executive functions contribute to children’s reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 96–102.Google Scholar
Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2007). Issues of causality in children’s reading comprehension. In McNamara, D. (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 47–71). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121.Google Scholar
Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2017). Children with specific text comprehension problems. In Cain, K., Compton, D. L., & Parrila, R. K. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 359–375). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Oakhill, J. V., & Yuill, N. (1986). Pronoun resolution in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders: Effects of memory load and inferential complexity. Language and Speech, 29, 25–37.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2015). Models of discourse comprehension. In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 217–231). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Lorch, R. F., Jr. (Eds.). (2015). Inferences during reading. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, R. E., Gutierrez, G., Teague, K., Checca, C., Kim, J. S., & Ho, T.-H. (2013). Variation in practice reading aloud: Ten versus twenty minutes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(2), 134–162.Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2011). Students on line: Reading and using digital information. OECD. Retrieved April 4, 2020, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264112995–enGoogle Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2019). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA, 2018). www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa_19963777Google Scholar
Office of Head Start. (2018). Head Start fact sheet. https://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/no–search/hs–program–fact–sheet–2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ogbu, J. (1982). Cultural discontinuities and schooling. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 13, 290–307.Google Scholar
Ogbu, J. (1999). Beyond language: Ebonics, proper English, and identity in a Black-American speech community. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 147–184.Google Scholar
Olson, R. K., Keenan, J. M., Byrne, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2014). Why do children differ in their development of reading and related skills? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 38–54.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T., Sabatini, J. P., & Wang, Z. (2019). Using scenario-based assessments to measure deep learning. In Millis, K., Long, D. L., Magliano, J. P., & Wiemer, K. (Eds.). Deep comprehension (pp. 197–208). Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T., Wang, Z., & Sabatini, J. (2019). How much knowledge is too little? When a lack of knowledge becomes a barrier to comprehension. Psychological Science, 30(9), 1344–1351.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T., Weeks, J., Sabatini, J. P., Halderman, L., & Steinberg, J. (2014). Designing reading comprehension assessments for reading interventions: How a theoretically motivated assessment can serve as an outcome measure. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 403–424.Google Scholar
Oudega, M., & van den Broek, P. (2019). Standards of coherence in reading. In Millis, K., Long, D. L., Magliano, J. P., & Wiemer, K. (Eds.), Deep comprehension (pp. 41–51). Routledge.Google Scholar
Ouellette, G., Martin-Chang, S., & Rossi, M. (2017). Learning from our mistakes: Improvements in spelling lead to gains in reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 350–357.Google Scholar
Ousterhout, L., Kim, A., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). The neurobiology of sentence comprehension. In Spivey, M. J., McRae, K., & Joanisse, M. F. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 365–389). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ozgungor, S., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Interactions among elaborative interrogation, knowledge, and interest in the process of constructing knowledge from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 437–443.Google Scholar
Pace, A., Luo, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2017). Identifying pathways between socioeconomic status and language development. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 285–308.Google Scholar
Pae, H. K. (2018a). The Korean writing system, Hangul, and word processing. In Pae, H. K. (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences (pp. 335–352). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pae, H. K. (Ed.). (2018b). Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pae, H. K., & Lee, Y. W. (2015). The resolution of visual noise in word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(3), 337–358.Google Scholar
Pae, T.-I. (2019). A simultaneous analysis of relations between L1 and L2 skills in reading and writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(1), 109–124.Google Scholar
Paige, D. D., Rasinski, T. V., & Magpuri-Lavell, T. (2012). Is fluent expressive reading important for high school readers? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(1), 67–76.Google Scholar
Paige, D. D., Rasinski, T. V., Magpuri-Lavell, T., & Smith, G. S. (2014). Interpreting the relationships among prosody, automaticity, accuracy, and silent reading comprehension in secondary students. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 123–156.Google Scholar
Palermo, F., Mikulski, A. M., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Marti, C. L., & Stargel, L. E. (2014). English exposure in the home and classroom: Predictions to Spanish-speaking pre-schoolers’ English vocabulary skills. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 1163–1187.Google Scholar
Palincsar, A. S. (2003). Collaborative approaches to comprehension instruction. In Sweet, A. & Snow, C. E. (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 99–114). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.Google Scholar
Palincsar, A. S., Pearson, P. D., Berman, A. I., & Afflerbach, P. (2020). Introduction to the Reading for Understanding initiative. In Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., & Berman, A. I. (Eds.), Reaping the rewards of the Reading for Understanding initiative (pp. 11–40). National Academy of Education. https://naeducation.org/reaping–the–rewards–of–reading–for–understanding–initiative/Google Scholar
Paris, S. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 184–202.Google Scholar
Paris, S. G., Wasik, B., & Turner, J. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In Barr, R., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P., & Pearson, P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 609–640). Longman.Google Scholar
Park, Y., & Warschauer, M. (2016). Reading instruction in a technological age. In Chen, X.., Dronjic, V., & Park-Helms, R. (Eds.), Reading in a second language: Cognitive and psycholinguistics issues (pp. 282–302). Routledge.Google Scholar
Parris, S. R., Gambrell, L. B., & Schleicher, A. (2015). Beyond borders: A global perspective on reading comprehension. In Parris, S. R. & Headley, K. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (3rd ed., pp. 7–28). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Pasquarella, A., Chen, X., Gottardo, A., & Geva, E. (2015). Common and language-specific processes in word reading accuracy and fluency: Comparing cross-language transfer between Spanish–English and Chinese–English bilinguals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 96–110.Google Scholar
Passingham, R. (2016). Cognitive neuroscience: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, P. D., & Cervetti, G. N. (2017). The roots of reading comprehension instruction. In Israel, S. E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 12–58). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In Barr, R., Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., & Pearson, P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 815–860). Longman.Google Scholar
Pearson, P. D., Palinscsar, A. S., Afflerbach, P., et al. (2020). Taking stock of the Reading for Understanding initiative. In Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., & Berman, A. I. (Eds.), Reaping the rewards of the Reading for Understanding initiative (pp. 252–292). National Academy of Education. https://naeducation.org/reaping–the–rewards–of–reading–for–understanding–initiative/Google Scholar
Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., & Berman, A. I. (Eds.). (2020). Reaping the rewards of the Reading for Understanding initiative. National Academy of Education. https://naeducation.org/reaping–the–rewards–of–reading–for–understanding–initiative/Google Scholar
Pecorari, D., & Shaw, P. (2012). Types of student intertextuality and faculty attitudes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 317–345.Google Scholar
Pellicer-Sanchez, A. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 97–130.Google Scholar
Pellicer-Sanchez, A. (2020). Learning single words vs. multiword items. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook on vocabulary learning (pp. 158–173). Routledge.Google Scholar
Peng, P., Barnes, M., Wang, C., et al. (2018). A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 48–76.Google Scholar
Peregoy, S. F., & Boyle, O. F. (2016). Reading, writing, and learning in ESL: A resource book for K–12 teachers (7th ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representational problem in reading acquisition. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C., & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849–894). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint for the reader. In Brown, C. & Hagoort, P. (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 167–208). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (2017). Lexical quality revisited. In Segers, E. & van den Broek, P. (Eds.), Developmental perspectives in written language and literacy (pp. 51–67). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Bolger, D. (2004). The brain might read that way. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 293–304.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Britt, M. (1995). Where do propositions come from? In Weaver, C., III, Mannes, S., & Fletcher, C. (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 11–34). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Cao, F., & Booth, J. (2013). Specialization and universals in the development of reading skill: How Chinese research informs a universal science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 5–21.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Dunlap, S. (2008). Learning to read: General principles and writing system variations. In Koda, K. & Zehler, A. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages (pp. 13–38). Routledge.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Harris, L. (2017). Learning to read English. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 347–370). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In Gorfien, D. (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 67–86). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In Snowling, M. & Hulme, C. (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 227–247). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Marron, M., & Foltz, P. (1996). Sources of comprehension failure: Theoretical perspectives and case studies. In Cornoldi, C. & Oakhill, J. (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties (pp. 137–165). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J. Z., (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J. Z. (2015). Comprehending implicit meanings in text without making inferences. In Cook, A. E. & O’Brien, E. J. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 1–18). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Stafura, J. Z., & Adlof, S. M. (2013). Reading comprehension and reading comprehension problems. In Miller, B., Cutting, L. E., & McCardle, P. (Eds.), Unraveling reading comprehension (pp. 22–42). Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Van Dyke, J., & Hart, L. (2001). The psycholinguistics of basic literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 127–149.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Epilogue: Universals and particulars in learning to read across seventeen orthogreaphies. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 455–466). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peter, M. S., Durrant, S., Jessop, A., Bidgood, A., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F. (2019). Does speed of processing or vocabulary size predict later language growth of toddlers? Cognitive Psychology, 115, 101238.Google Scholar
Peters, E. (2020). Factors affecting the learning of single-word items. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 125–242). Routledge.Google Scholar
Petschur, Y. (2010). A meta-analysis of the relationship between student attitudes towards reading and achievement in reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(4), 335–355.Google Scholar
Petschur, Y., Al Otaiba, S., Wanzek, J., Rivas, B., & Jones, F. (2017). The relation between global and specific mindset with reading outcomes for elementary school students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(5), 376–391.Google Scholar
Petschur, Y., Caball, S. Q., Catts, H. W., Compton, D. L., Foorman, B. R., Hart, S. A., Lonigan, C. J., Phillips, B. M., Schatschneider, C., Steacy, L. M., Terry, N. P., Wagner, R. K. (2020). How the science of reading informs 21st-Century education. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), 267–282.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2018). Seventeen percent of teens can’t finish homework because of digital divide. www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/10/26/nearly-one-in-five-teens-cant-always-finish-their-homework-because-of-the-digital-divide/Google Scholar
Phillips, B., & Lonigan, C. (2005). Social correlates of emergent literacy. In Snowling, M. A. & Hulme, C. (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 173–187). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pickering, M., & Traxler, M. (2000). Parsing and incremental understanding during reading. In Crocker, M., Pickering, M., & Clifton, C. (Eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing (pp. 238–258). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pigada, M., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Piper, K. (2019, January 8). Study: Head Start improves kids’ lives. But we’re still just finding out how. www.vox.com/future–perfect/2019/1/8/18166068/study–head–start–child–poverty/Google Scholar
Plakans, L. (2009). The role of reading strategies in integrated L2 writing tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 252–266.Google Scholar
Plakans, L. (2010). Independent vs. integrated writing tasks: A comparison of task representation. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 185–194.Google Scholar
Plakans, L., Laio, J.-T., & Wang, F. (2018). Integrated assessment research: Writing–into–reading. Language Teaching, 51(3), 430–434.Google Scholar
Plaut, D. (2005). Connectionist approaches to reading. In Snowling, M. & Hulme, C. (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 24–38). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.Google Scholar
Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471–491.Google Scholar
Pollatsek, A., & Treiman, R. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of reading. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poulson, M., & Gravgaard, A. K. D. (2016). Who did what to whom? The relationship between syntactic aspects of sentence comprehension and text comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(4), 325–338.Google Scholar
Powell, D., Stainthorp, R., & Stuart, M. (2014). Deficits in orthographic processing in children poor at Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) tasks. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(3), 192–207.Google Scholar
Pressley, M. (2002a). Comprehension strategy instruction: A turn–of–the–century status report. In Block, C. & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 11–27). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Pressley, M. (2002b). Metacognition and self-regulated instruction. In Farstrup, A. & Samuels, S. J. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 291–309). International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Pressley, M., Dolezal, S., Raphael, L., Mohan, L., Roehrig, A., & Bogner, K. (2003). Motivating primary-grade students. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Pressley, M., & Fingeret, L. (2007). What we have learned since the National Reading Panel. In Pressley, M., Billman, A., Perry, K., Reffit, K., & Reynolds, J. (Eds.), Shaping literacy achievement (pp. 216–245). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Pressley, M., Gaskins, I., Solic, K., & Collins, S. (2006). A portrait of Benchmark School: How a school produces high achievement in students who previously failed. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 282–306.Google Scholar
Pressley, M., & Harris, S. (2006). Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In Alexander, P. A. & Winne, P. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 265–286). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pressley, M., Johnson, C., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J., & Kurita, J. (1989). Strategies that improve memory and comprehension of what is read. Elementary School Journal, 90, 3–32.Google Scholar
Pressley, M., & Woloshyn, V. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance. Brookline Books.Google Scholar
Pretorius, E. (2005). English as a second language learner differences in anaphoric resolution: Reading to learn in the academic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 521–539.Google Scholar
Proctor, C. P., August, D., Carlo, M. S., & Snow, C. (2006). The intriguing role of Spanish language vocabulary knowledge in predicting English reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 159–169.Google Scholar
Proctor, C. P., Silverman, R. D., Harring, J. R., & Montecillo, C. (2012). The role of vocabulary depth in predicting reading comprehension among English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual children in elementary school. Reading and Writing, 25, 1635–1664.Google Scholar
Pugh, K. R., Frost, S. J., Landi, N., Preston, J. L., Mencl, W. E., & Rueckl, J. G. (2013). Neuroimaging studies of reading disabilities. In Miller, B., Cutting, L. E., & McCardle, P. (Eds.), Unraveling reading comprehension: Behavioral, neurobiological, and genetic components (pp. 164–175). Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Puglisi, M. L., Hulme, C., Hamilton, L. G., & Snowling, M. J. (2017). The home literacy environment is a correlate, but perhaps not a cause, of variations in children’s language and literacy development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(6), 498–514.Google Scholar
Pulido, D., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2008). The virtuous circle: Modeling individual differences in L2 reading and vocabulary development. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 164–190.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., & Fadiga, L., (2016). Brain language mechanisms built on action and perception. In Hickok, G. & Small, S. S. (Eds.), Neurobiology of language (311–338). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Puma, M., Bell, S. H., Cook, R., Heid, C., & Shapiro, G. (2010). Head Start impact study. Final Report. Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.Google Scholar
Purpura, J. E. (2016). Second and foreign language assessment. Modern Language Journal, 100(S), 190–208.Google Scholar
Pyle, N., Vasquez, A., Lignugaris-Kraft, B., et al. (2017). Effects of expository text structure interventions on comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(4), 469–501.Google Scholar
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–536.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. M., & Wagner, R. K. (2018). Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to study developmental change in relations between language and literacy. Child Development, 89(6), 1956–1969.Google Scholar
RAND Reading Study Group, & Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Rapp, D., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 289–312.Google Scholar
Rasinski, T. V. (2010). The fluent reader: Oral and silent reading strategies for building fluency, word recognition and comprehension (2nd ed.). Scholastic.Google Scholar
Rasinski, T. V., Blachowicz, C., & Lems, K. (Eds.). (2012). Fluency instruction: Research-based best practices (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rasinski, T. V., Chang, S.-C., Edmondson, E., et al. (2017). Reading fluency and college readiness. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 60(4), 453–460.Google Scholar
Rasinski, T. V., & Cheesman Smith, M. (2018). The megabook of fluency: Strategies and texts to engage all readers. Scholastic.Google Scholar
Rasinski, T. V., & Padak, N. (Eds.). (2013). From fluency to comprehension: Powerful instruction through authentic reading. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rasinski, T. V., Reutzel, D. R., Chard, D., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2011). Reading fluency. In Kamil, M. L., Pearson, P. D., Moje, E. B., & Afflerbach, P. P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 286–319). Routledge.Google Scholar
Rasinski, T. V., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 350–361.Google Scholar
Raudszus, H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2018). Lexical quality and executive control predict children’s first and second language reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 31, 405–424.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Abbott, M. J., & Plummer, P. (2016). Individual differences in perceptual processing and eye movement in reading. In Afflerbach, P. (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading (pp. 348–363). Routledge.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Juhasz, B., & Pollatsek, A. (2005). Eye movements during reading. In Snowling, M. A. & Hulme, C. (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 79–97). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Reading Research Study Group (RRSG), & Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward and R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Reed, D., Petschur, Y., & Foorman, B. (2016). The contribution of vocabulary knowledge and spelling to the reading comprehension of adolescents who are and who are not English language learners. Reading and Writing, 29, 633–657.Google Scholar
Retelsdorf, J., Koller, O., & Moller, J. (2011). On the effects of motivation on reading performance growth in secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 550–559.Google Scholar
Reutzel, D. R., Jones, C. D., & Newman, T. H. (2010). Scaffolded silent reading: Improving the conditions of silent reading practice in classrooms. In Hiebert, E. F. & Reutzel, D. R. (Eds.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 129–150). International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Reutzel, D. R., Spichtig, A. N., & Petschur, Y. (2012). Exploring the value added of a guided, silent reading intervention: Effects on struggling third-grade readers’ achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 105, 404–415.Google Scholar
Révész, A., & Brunfaut, T. (2021). Validating assessment for research purposes. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and language testing (pp. 21–32). Routledge.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A., & Gill, S. (1994). The role of parental perspectives in the school adjustment of inner-city Black children. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 23, 671–694.Google Scholar
Reynolds, G. A., & Perin, D. (2009). A comparison of text structure and self-regulated writing strategies for composing from sources by middle school students. Reading Psychology, 30, 265–300.Google Scholar
Ricciuti, A., St. Pierre, R., Lee, W., Parsad, A., & Rimdzius, T. (2004). Third National Even Start evaluation: Follow-up findings from the experimental design study. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.Google Scholar
Rindermann, H., & Baumeister, A. E. E. (2015). Parents’ SES vs. parental educational behavior and children’s development: A reanalysis of the Hart and Risley study. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 133–138.Google Scholar
Robb, T. (2015). Quizzes – A sin against the sixth commandment? In defense of MReader. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 146–151.Google Scholar
Robb, T., & Kano, M. (2013). Effective extensive reading outside the classroom: A large-scale experiment. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25(2), 234–247.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C., van den Boer, M., Jiménez, J. E., & de Jong, P. F. (2015). Developmental changes in the relations between RAN, phonological awareness, and reading in Spanish children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 273–288.Google Scholar
Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 573–605.Google Scholar
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.Google Scholar
Rossi, M., Martin-Chang, S., & Ouellette, G. (2019). Exploring the space between good and poor spelling: Orthographic quality and reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(2), 192–201.Google Scholar
Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (2014). Multimedia learning from multiple documents. In Mayer, R. E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 813–841). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(5), 1762–1774.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009, February 13). Differences in early gesture explain SES disparities in child vocabulary size at school entry. Science, 323, 951–953.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L., Raudenbuch, S. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). The pace of vocabulary growth helps predict later vocabulary skill. Child Development, 83(2), 508–525.Google Scholar
Rueckl, J. G., Paz-Alonzo, P. M., Molfese, P. J., et al. (2015). Universal brain signature of proficient reading: Evidence from four contrasting languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 112(50), 15510–15515.Google Scholar
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.Google Scholar
Sabatini, J. P., & O’Reilly, T. (2013). Rationale for a new generation of reading comprehension assessments. In Miller, B., Cutting, L. E., & McCardle, P. (Eds.), Unraveling reading comprehension (pp. 100–111). Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Sabatini, J. P., Sawaki, Y., Shore, J. R., & Scarborough, H. S. (2010). Relationships among reading skills of adults with low literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(2), 122–138.Google Scholar
Salmerón, L., Strømsø, H., Kammerer, Y., Stadler, M., & van den Broek, P. (2019). Comprehension process in digital reading. In Barzillai, M., Thompson, J., Schroeder, S., & van den Broek, P. (Eds.), Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 91–120). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Samuels, S. J. (2007). The DIBELS test: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by fluency? Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 563–566.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Cases, R., & García-Albea, J. (2005). The representation of cognate and noncognate words in bilingual memory. In Kroll, J. & DeGroot, A. (Eds.)Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 226–250). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Savage, A. (2017). Big ideas. Reader’s Choice. Variety Pack (Intermediate). Waysgoose Press.Google Scholar
Schaffner, E., Phillipp, M., & Schiefele, U. (2016). Reciprocal effects between intrinsic reading motivation and reading competence? A cross-lagged panel model for academic track and non-academic track students. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(1), 19–36.Google Scholar
Schaffner, E., Schiefele, U., & Ulferts, H. (2013). Reading amount as a mediator of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 369–385.Google Scholar
Schiefele, U., & Löweke, S. (2017). The nature, development, and effects of elementary students’ reading motivation profiles. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(4), 405–421.Google Scholar
Schiefele, U., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Factorial and construct validity of a new instrument for the assessment of reading motivation. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2), 221–237.Google Scholar
Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427–463.Google Scholar
Schiefele, U., Stutz, F., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Longitudinal relations between reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 49–58.Google Scholar
Schmalhofer, F., & Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Neural and behavioral indicators of integration processes across sentence boundaries. In Schmalhofer, F. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain (pp. 161–188). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47(4), 484–503.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching (2nd ed.) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scholes, L. (2019). Differences in attitudes towards reading and other school-related activities among boys and girls. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(3–4), 485–503.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H., & Bursuck, W. D. (2016). Self-efficacy, agency, and volition: Student beliefs and reading motivation. In Afflerbach, P. (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading (pp. 54–66). Routledge.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and the ends. In Alexander, P. A. & Winne, P. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 349–367). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Benjamin, R. G. (2017). Lexical prosody as an aspect of oral reading fluency. Reading and Writing, 30, 143–162.Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Knapp, N. F. (2016). The psychology of reading: Theory and applications. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Kuhn, M. (2016). Reading fluency. In Afflerbach, P. (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading (pp. 107–119). Routledge.Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Ruston, H. (2008). Becoming a fluent reader: From theory to practice. In Kuhn, M. & Schwanenflugel, P. (Eds.), Fluency in the classroom (pp. 1–16). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M., & Baladzhaeva, L. (2016). The social context of second language literacy and biliteracy. In Chen, X., Dronjic, V., & Park-Helms, R. (Eds.), Reading in a second language: Cognitive and psycholinguistic issues (pp. 195–235). Routledge.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In Kroll, J. & de Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 371–388). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. (2012). Computational models of reading. In Spivey, M. J., McRae, K., & Joanisse, M. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 186–203). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M., & MacDonald, M. C. (2018). The impact of language experience on language and reading: A statistical learning approach. Topics in Language Disorders, 38(1), 66–83.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., Borkenhagen, M. C., & Kearns, D. M. (2020). Lost in translation? Challenges in connecting reading science and educational practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), 119–130.Google Scholar
Sénéchal, M. (2015). Young children’s home literacy experiences. In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 326–343). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 445–460.Google Scholar
Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2014). Continuity and change in the home literacy environment as predictors of growth in vocabulary and reading. Child Development, 85(4), 1552–1568.Google Scholar
Sénéchal, M., Ouellette, G., & Rodney, D. (2006). The misunderstood giant: On the predictive role of early vocabulary to future reading. In Dickinson, D. & Neuman, S. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy development (Vol. 2, pp. 173–182). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sénéchal, M., & Young, L. (2008). The effect of family literacy interventions on children’s acquisition of reading from kindergarten to Grade 3: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 78, 880–907.Google Scholar
Serpell, R., Sonnenschein, S., Baker, L., & Ganapathy, H. (2002). Intimate culture of families in the early socialization of literacy. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 391–405.Google Scholar
Settles, B., LaFlair, G. T., & Hagiwara, M. (2020). Machine learning-driven language assessment. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8, 247–263.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. (2006). Theoretical framework for beginning reading in different orthographies. In Joshi, R. M. & Aaron, P. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 441–462). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shahar-Yames, D., & Share, D. (2008). Spelling as a self-teaching mechanism in orthographic learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(1), 22–39.Google Scholar
Shahaeian, A., Wang, C., Tucker-Drob, E., Geiger, V., Bus, A. G., & Harrison, L. J. (2018). Early shared reading, socioeconomic status, and children’s cognitive and school competence: Six years of longitudinal evidence. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(6), 485–502.Google Scholar
Shanahan, C. (2014). Reading and writing across multiple texts. In Hinchman, K. A. & Sheridan-Thomas, K. A. (Eds.), Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction (2nd ed., pp. 169–188). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2012). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393–429.Google Scholar
Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing fluency in the context of effective literacy instruction. In Rasinski, T. V., Blachowicz, C., & Lems, K. (Eds.), Fluency instruction: Research-based best practices. (pp. 21–38). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Shanahan, T. (2016). Relationships between reading and writing development. In MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 194–207). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Shanahan, T. (2019). Reading–writing connections. In Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A., & Hebert, M. (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (3rd ed., pp. 309–332). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Shanahan, T. (2020). What constitutes a science of reading instruction? Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), 235–247.Google Scholar
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 40–59.Google Scholar
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18.Google Scholar
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2014). Teaching history and literacy. In Hinchman, K. A. & Sheridan-Thomas, K. A. (Eds.), Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction (2nd ed., pp. 232–248). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, D. (1995). The psychology of associative learning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, D. (1997). Representation of categories and concepts in memory. In Conway, M. (Ed.), Cognitive models of memory (pp. 111–146). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267–298.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocenticities of current reading research and practice: The perils of over-reliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–616.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2017). Learning to read Hebrew. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 155–180). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shi, L. (2006). Cultural backgrounds and textual appropriations. Language Awareness, 15, 264–282.Google Scholar
Shi, L. (2012). Rewriting and paraphrasing source texts in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 134–148.Google Scholar
Shin, J. (2020). The interplay between working memory and topic familiarity in L2 reading comprehension. PhD Dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
Shin, J., Dronjic, V., & Park, B. (2019). The interplay between working memory and background knowledge in L2 reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 53(2), 320–347.Google Scholar
Shiotsu, T. (2010). Components of L2 reading (Studies in Language Testing 32). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shotter, E. R., & Rayner, K. (2015). The work of the eyes during reading. In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 44–59). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siegelman, N., & Frost, R. (2015). Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 105–120.Google Scholar
Silverman, R. D., Proctor, C. P., Harring, R. J., Hartranft, A. M., Doyle, B., & Zelinke, S. B. (2015). Language skills and reading comprehension in English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual children in grades 2–5. Reading and Writing, 28, 1381–1405.Google Scholar
Silverman, R. D., Speece, D. L., Harring, J. R., & Ritchey, K. D. (2013). Fluency has a role to play in the simple view of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(2), 108–133.Google Scholar
Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017a). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041.Google Scholar
Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017b). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172.Google Scholar
Singer, M., & Leon, J. (2007). Psychological studies of higher language processes: Behavioral and empirical approaches. In Schmalhofer, F. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain (pp. 9–23). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Singer Trakhman, L. M., Alexander, P. A., & Silverman, A. B. (2018). Profiling reading in print and digital mediums. Learning and Instruction, 57, 5–17Google Scholar
Sirin, S. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.Google Scholar
Siu, C. T.-S., & Ho, C. S.-H. (2015). Cross-language transfer of syntactic skills and reading comprehension among young Cantonese–English bilingual students. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(3), 313–336.Google Scholar
Smith, G. S., & Paige, D. D. (2019). A study of reliability across multiple raters when using NAEP and MDFS rubrics to measure oral reading fluency. Reading Psychology, 40, 34–69.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., Griffin, P., & Burns, S. (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading. Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., Porche, M., & Tabors, P., & Harris, S. (2007). Is literacy enough? Pathways to academic success for adolescents. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., & Sweet, A. (2003). Reading for comprehension. In Sweet, A. & Snow, C. E. (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 1–11). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Snow, M. A., & Brinton, D. M. (Eds.). (2017). The content-based classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Spada, N. (2011). Beyond form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44, 225–236.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., & Murdoch, A. (2014). Early reading success and its relationship to reading achievement and reading volume: Replication of ‘10 years later’. Reading and Writing, 27, 189–211.Google Scholar
Spencer, M., Quinn, J. M., & Wagner, R. K. (2017). Vocabulary, morphology, and reading comprehension. In Cain, K., Compton, D. l., & Parrila, R. K. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 239–256). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Spivey, N. N. (1997). The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stafura, J. Z., & Perfetti, C. A. (2014). Word–to–text integration: Message level and lexical level influences in ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 64, 41–53.Google Scholar
Stafura, J. Z., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017). Integrating word processing with text comprehension: Theoretical frameworks and empirical examples. In Cain, K., Compton, D. L., & Parrila, R. K. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 9–31). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stahl, S. A., & Heubach, K. (2005). Fluency-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 25–60.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 211–229.Google Scholar
Staub, A. (2015). Reading sentences: Syntactic parsing and asemantic interpretation. In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 202–216). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steacy, L. M., Elleman, A. M., & Compton, D. L. (2017). Opening the “black box” of learning to read: Inductive learning mechanisms supporting word acquisition development with a focus on children who struggle to read. In Cain, K., Compton, D., & Parrila, R. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 99–121). John Benjamin.Google Scholar
Steinhauer, K. (2014). Event-related potentials (ERPs) in second language research: A brief introduction to the technique, a selected review, and an invitation to reconsider critical period in L2. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 393–417.Google Scholar
Stigler, J. W., & Miller, K. F. (2018). Expertise and expert performance in teaching. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 430–452). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stipek, D., Feiler, R., Daniels, D., & Milburn, S. (1995). Effects of different instructional approaches on young children’s achievement and motivation. Child Development, 66, 209–223.Google Scholar
Stipek, D., & Valentino, R. A. (2015). Early childhood memory and attention as predictors of academic growth trajectories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 771–788.Google Scholar
Stoffelsma, L., Spooren, W., Mwinlaaru, I. N., & Antwi, V. (2020). The morphology-vocabulary-reading mechanism and its effect on students’ academic achievement in an English L2 context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 47, 100887.Google Scholar
Stoller, F. L. (2006). Establishing a theoretical foundation for project-based learning in second and foreign language contexts. In Beckett, G. H. & Miller, P. C. (Eds.), Project-based second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future (pp. 19–40). Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Stoller, F. L., Anderson, N. J., Grabe, W., & Komiyama, R. (2013). Instructional enhancements to improve students’ reading abilities. English Teaching Forum, 51(1), 2–11, 33.Google Scholar
Stoller, F. L., & Grabe, W. (2017). Building coherence into the content-based curriculum: Six Ts revisited. In Snow, M. A. & Brinton, D. M. (Eds.), The content-based classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content (2nd ed., pp. 53–66). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Stoller, F. L., Grabe, W., & Kashmar-Wolf, E. (2018). Digital reading in EFL reading to learn contexts. Language Education in Asia (LEiA), 9, 1–14.Google Scholar
Stoller, F. L., & Myers, C. C. (2020). Project-based learning: A five-stage framework to guide language teachers. In Gras-Velázquez, A. (Ed.), Project-based learning in second language acquisition: Building communities of practice in higher education (pp. 25–47). Routledge.Google Scholar
Stoller, F. L., & Nguyen, T. H. L. (2020). Reading habits of Vietnamese university English majors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 48, 100906.Google Scholar
Stutz, F., Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2016). Relations among reading motivation, reading amount, and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 101–113.Google Scholar
Stutz, F., Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2017). Measurement invariance and validity of a brief questionnaire on reading motivation in elementary students. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(4), 439–461.Google Scholar
Suggate, S., Schaughency, F., McAnally, H., & Reese, E. (2018). From infancy to adolescence: The longitudinal links between vocabulary, early literacy skills, oral narrative, and reading comprehension. Cognitive Development, 47, 82–95.Google Scholar
Suk, N. (2017). The effects of extensive reading on reading comprehension, reading rate, and vocabulary acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 73–89.Google Scholar
Suk, N. (2018). L2 Students’ perceptions of MReader for extensive reading. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 21(4), 163–180.Google Scholar
Suk, N. (2021). Developing a sensitive but generalizable measurement of vocabulary gains from self-selected extensive reading. System, 101, 102614 (online version).Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67(4), 747–790.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Nakata, T., & DeKeyser, R. (2019). The desirable difficulty framework as a theoretical foundation for optimizing and researching second language practice. Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 713–720.Google Scholar
Swanson, H. L., Orosco, M. J., Lussier, C. M., Gerber, M. M., & Guzman-Orth, D. A. (2011). The influence of working memory and phonological processing on English language learner children’s bilingual reading and language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 838–856.Google Scholar
Taguchi, E., & Gorsuch, G. (2002). Transfer effect of repeated EFL reading on reading new passages: A preliminary investigation. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 43–65.Google Scholar
Taguchi, E., & Gorsuch, G. (2012). Fluency instruction in reading in a second or foreign language. In Rasinski, T., Blachowicz, C., & Lems, K. (Eds.), Fluency instruction: Research-based best practices (2nd. ed., 255–277). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Taguchi, E., Gorsuch, G., Lems, K., & Rosszell, R. (2016). Scaffolding in L2 reading: How repetition and an auditory model help readers. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(1), 101–117.Google Scholar
Taguchi, E., Gorsuch, G., Takayasu-Maass, M., & Snipp, K. (2012). Assisted repeated reading with an advanced-level Japanese EFL reader: A longitudinal diary study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(1), 33–55.Google Scholar
Takase, A. (2007). Japanese high school students’ motivation for extensive L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19, 1–18.Google Scholar
Taki, S. (2016). Metacognitive online reading strategy use: Readers’ perceptions in L1 and L2. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(4), 409–427.Google Scholar
Talwar, A., Tighe, E. L., & Greenberg, D. (2018). Augmenting the simple view of reading for struggling adult readers: A unique role for background knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(5), 351–366.Google Scholar
Taylor, A., Stevens, J., & Asher, J. W. (2006). The effects of explicit reading strategy training on L2 reading comprehension. In Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 213–244). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Theakston, A. L., Ibbotson, P., Freudenthal, D., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Productivity of noun slots in verb frames. Cognitive Science, 39, 1369–1395.Google Scholar
Theakston, A. L., & Lieven, E. (2017). Multiunit sequences in first language acquisition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 588–603.Google Scholar
Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2014). A dominance analysis approach to determining predictor importance in third, seventh, and tenth grade reading comprehension skills. Reading and Writing, 27, 101–127.Google Scholar
Trabasso, T., & Bouchard, E. (2002). Teaching readers how to comprehend texts strategically. In Block, C. & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 176–200). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Hulslander, J., Olson, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., Byrne, B., & Kessler, B. (2019). The unique role of early spelling in the prediction of later literacy performance. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(5), 437–444.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2022). Statistical learning in word reading and spelling across languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(2), 139–149.Google Scholar
Turner, C. E., & Purpura, J. E. (2016). Learning-oriented assessment in second and foreign language classrooms. In Tsagari, D. & Banerjee, J. (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment (pp. 255–273). DeGruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Uccelli, P., Demir-Lira, O. E., Rowe, M. L., Levine, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2019). Children’s early decontextualized talk predicts academic language proficiency in mid-adolescence. Child Development, 90(5), 1650–1663.Google Scholar
Uccelli, P., Galloway, E. P., Barr, C. D., Meneses, A., & Dobbs, C. L. (2015). Beyond vocabulary: Exploring cross-disciplinary academic proficiency and its association with reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(3), 337–356.Google Scholar
Uchihara, T., Webb, S., & Yanagisawa, A. (2019). The effects of repetition on incidental vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. Language Learning, 69(3), 559–599.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. (2015). The declarative/procedural model. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 135–158). Routledge.Google Scholar
UNICEF. (2020). Two–thirds of the world’s children have no internet at home. www.unicefusa.org/stories/two–thirds–worlds–school–age–children–have–no–internet–home/37934Google Scholar
Unrau, N. J., Rueda, R., Son, E., Polanin, J. R., Lundeen, R. J., & Muraszewski, A. K. (2018). Can reading self-efficiency be modified? A meta-analysis of the impact of interventions on reading self-efficiency. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 167–204.Google Scholar
Urquhart, S., & Weir, C. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. Longman.Google Scholar
US News and World Report. (2015). Most US students come from low income families. www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data–mine/2015/01/16/most–us–students–come–from–low–income–familiesGoogle Scholar
van Bergen, E., Vasalampi, K., & Torppa, M. (2020). How are practice and performance related? Development of reading from age 5 to 15. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(3), 415–434.Google Scholar
Vande Kopple, W. (1986). Given and new information and some aspects of the structures, semantics, and pragmatics of written texts. In Cooper, C. & Greenbaum, S. (Eds.), Studying writing: Linguistic approaches (pp. 72–111). Sage.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P. (2012). Individual and developmental differences in reading comprehension: Assessing cognitive processes and outcomes. In Sabatini, J. P., Albro, E. R., & O’Reilly, T. (Eds.), Measuring up (pp. 39–58). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Beker, K., & Oudega, M. (2015). Inference generation in text comprehension: Automatic and strategic processes in the construction of a mental representation. In Cook, A. E. & O’Brien, E. J. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 94–121). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & While, M. J. (2011). When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 123–139). Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., & Helder, A. (2017). Cognitive processes in discourse comprehension: Passive processes, reader-initiated processes, and evolving mental representations. Discourse Processes, 54(5–6), 360–372.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Helder, A., & Van Leijenhorst, L. (2013). Sensitivity to structural centrality. In Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R., & Rouet, J.-F. (Eds.), Reading – From words to multiple texts (pp. 132–146). Routledge.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2017). Development of reading comprehension: Change and continuity in the ability to construct coherent representations. In Cain, K., Compton, D. L., & Parrila, R. K. (Eds.). Theories of reading development (pp. 283–305). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In Taylor, B., Graves, M., & van den Broek, P. (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 1–31). Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Mouw, J. M., & Kraal, A. (2016). Individual differences in reading comprehension. In Afflerbach, P. (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading (pp. 138–150). Routledge.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C., & Thurlow, R. (1996). A “Landscape” view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. In Britton, B. & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 165–187). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and on-line construction of a memory representation. In van Oostendorp, H. & Goldman, S. (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A., & Shankweiler, D. P. (2013). From verbal efficiency theory to lexical quality: The role of memory processes in reading comprehension. In Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R., & Rouet, J.-F. (Eds.), Reading – From words to multiple texts (pp. 115–131). Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., de Glopper, K., et al. (2003). Roles of linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and processing speed in L3, L2, and L1 reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
Van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., de Glopper, K., et al. (2004). Linguistic knowledge, processing speed, and metacognitive knowledge in first- and second-language reading comprehension: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 19–30.Google Scholar
van Ockenburg, L., van Weijen, D., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2019). Learning to write synthesis texts: A review of intervention studies. Journal of Writing Research, 19(3),402–428.Google Scholar
van Steensel, R., Oostdam, R., van Gelderen, A. (2019). Affirming and undermining motivations for reading and associations with reading comprehension, age and gender. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(3–4), 504–522.Google Scholar
van Steensel, R., Oostdam, R., van Gelderen, A., van Schooten, E. (2016). The role of word decoding, vocabulary knowledge and meta-cognitive knowledge in monolingual and bilingual low-achieving adolescents’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(3), 312–329.Google Scholar
van Steensel, R., McElvany, N., Kurvers, J., & Herppich, S. (2011). How effective are family literacy programs? Results of a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 69–96.Google Scholar
Vaughn, S., & Hall, C. (2017). Theoretically guided interventions for adolescents who are poor readers. In Cain, K., Compton, D. L., & Parrila, R. K. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 489–506). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., Swanson, E. A., et al. (2011). Efficacy of Collaborative Strategic Reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 938–954.Google Scholar
Vaughn, S., Martinez, L. R., Wanzek, J., Roberts, G., Swanson, E., & Fall, A. M. (2017). Improving content knowledge and comprehension for English language learners: Findings from a randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology,109(1), 22–34.Google Scholar
Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Swanson, E. A., Wanzek, J., Fall, A. M., & Stillman-Spisak, S. J. (2015). Improving middle-school students’ knowledge and comprehension in social studies: A replication. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 31–50.Google Scholar
Vaughn, S., Swanson, E. A., Roberts, G., et al. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 77–93.Google Scholar
Veenman, M. V. J. (2016). Metacognition. In Afflerbach, P. (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading (pp. 26–40). Routledge.Google Scholar
Veenman, M. V. J. (2017). Assessing metacognition in reading processes. In Mokhtari, K. (Ed.), Improving reading comprehension through metacognitive reading strategy instruction (pp. 51–68). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (2011). Second language reading acquisition. In Kamil, M. L., Pearson, P. D., Moje, E. B., & Afflerbach, P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 661–683). Routledge.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (2013). Reading acquisition in a transparent orthography: The case of Dutch. In Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R., & Rouet, J.-F. (Eds.), Reading—From words to multiple texts (pp. 34–51). Routledge.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (2017). Learning to read in a second language. In Cain, K., Compton, D., & Parrila, R. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 215–234). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017a). Introduction: Operating principles in learning to read. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.) Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 1–29). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.). (2017b). Learning to read across languages and writing systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2022). Universals in learning to read across languages and writing. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(2), 150–164.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., Perfetti, C. A., & Pugh, K. (2019). Cross-linguistic perspectives on second language reading. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 1–6.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2012). The simple view of second language reading throughout the primary grades. Reading and Writing, 25, 1805–1818.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J., & Vermeer, A (2011). Vocabulary growth and reading development across elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 8–25.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., Voeten, M., & Vermeer, A. (2019). Beyond the simple view of early first and second language reading: The impact of lexical quality. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 28–36.Google Scholar
Vogels, E. A. (2021). Digital divide persists even as low-income Americans make gains in tech adoption. Pew Research Center. www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/06/22/digital-divide-persists-even-as-americans-with-lower-incomes-make-gains-in-tech-adoption/Google Scholar
Voss, J., & Silfes, L. (1996). Learning from history text: The interaction of knowledge and comprehension skill with text structure. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 45–68.Google Scholar
Wang, J., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186.Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2020a). Incidental vocabulary learning. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 225–239). Routledge.Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Chang, A. C.-S. (2015). How does prior word knowledge affect vocabulary learning progress in an extensive reading program? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 651–675.Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weigle, S. C., & Parker, K. (2012). Source text borrowing in an integrated reading/writing assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 118–133.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (2010).The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation. Educational Psychologist, 45, 28–36.Google Scholar
Weir, C. J., & Chan, S. (2019). Research and practice in assessing academic reading: The case of IELTS. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weir, C. J., & Milanovich, M., (Eds.). (2003). Continuity and innovation: Revising the Cambridge Proficiency in English examination 1913–2002. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weir, C. J., Vidaković, I., & Galaczi, E. D. (2013). Measured constructs: A history of Cambridge English Language Examinations 1913–2012. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weizman, Z., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical input as related to children’s vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology, 37, 265–279.Google Scholar
Welie, C., Schoonen, R., Kuiken, F., & van den Bergh, H. (2017). Expository text comprehension in secondary school: For which readers does knowledge of connectives contribute the most? Journal of Research in Reading, 40(S1), S42–S65.Google Scholar
Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology 58, 250–271.Google Scholar
Westby, C. E. (2014). A language perspective on executive functioning, metacognition, and self-regulation in reading. In Stone, C. A., Silliman, E. R., Ehren, B. J., & Wallach, G. P. (Eds.), Handbook of language & literacy development and disorders (pp. 339–358). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wharton-McDonald, R., & Erickson, J. (2017). Reading comprehension in the middle grades. In Israel, S. E. (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 353–376). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
White, K. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481.Google Scholar
White, K., Taylor, M., & Moss, V. (1992). Does research support claims about the benefits of involving parents in early intervention programs? Review of Educational Research, 62, 91–125.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. (1984). Grammar, and nonsense, and language. In Widdowson, H. (Ed.), Aspects of language teaching (pp. 79–98). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32, 59–68.Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In Lamb, M. E. & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes (pp. 657–700). John Wiley.Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420–432.Google Scholar
Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J. F., & Lei, P. (2017). Web-based text structure strategy instruction improves seventh graders’ content area reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 741–760.Google Scholar
Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J. F., Lei, P., Hernandez, A. C., & August, D. L. (2018). Improving content area reading comprehension of Spanish speaking English learners in grades 4 and 5 using web-based text structure instruction. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 1969–1996.Google Scholar
Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3–14.Google Scholar
Wiliam, D. (2016). The secret of effective feedback. Educational Leadership, 73(7), 10–15.Google Scholar
Wiliam, D. (2018a). Creating the schools our children need: Why what we are doing now won’t help much (and what we can do instead). Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2015). Embedding formative assessment: Practical techniques for K–12 classrooms. Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Son, H. S. (2011). A dialogic turn in research on learning and teaching to comprehend. In Kamil, M. L., Pearson, P. D., Moje, E. B., & Afflerbach, P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 359–387). Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, J. P. (2002). Reading comprehension strategies and teacher preparation. In Farstrup, A. & Samuels, S. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction. (3rd ed., pp. 243–260). International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Williams, J. P. (2007). Literacy in the curriculum: Integrating text structure and content area instruction. In McNamara, D. S. (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies (pp. 199–219). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Williams, J. P. (2018). Text structure instruction: The research in moving forward. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 1923–1939.Google Scholar
Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., Lauer, K. D., Stafford, K. B., DeSisto, L. A., & deCani, J. S. (2005). Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 538–550Google Scholar
Williams, J. P., Kao, J. C., Pao, L. S., et al. (2016). Close analysis of texts with structure (CATS): An intervention to teach reading comprehension to at-risk second graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1061–1077.Google Scholar
Williams, J. P., Pollini, S., Nubla-Kung, A. M., et al. (2014). An intervention to improve comprehension of cause/effect through expository text structure instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Williams, J. P., Stafford, K. B., Lauer, K. D., Hall, K. M., & Pollini, S. (2009). Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Willingham, D. T. (2017). The reading mind: A cognitive approach to understanding how the mind reads. Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. K., & Stoller, F. L. (2018). Addressing EAP students’ reading skill needs through textbook supplementation. In Wong, L. T. & Wong, W. I. (Eds.), Teaching and learning English for academic purposes: Current research and practices (pp. 179–197). Nova Science.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. (2018). Reader, come home: The reading brain in a digital world. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Wolff, U. (2015). RAN as a predictor of reading skills, and vice versa: Results from a randomized reading intervention. Annals of Dyslexia, 64(2), 151–165.Google Scholar
Wolters, A. P., Kim, Y.-S. G., & Szura, J. W. (2022). Is reading prosody related to reading comprehension? A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2016). Data for world population ages 15–64 at 4.9 billion. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.1564.TO?view=chartGoogle Scholar
Wylie, J., Thompson, J., Leppänen, P. H. T., Ackerman, R., Kanniainen, L., & Prieler, T. (2019). Cognitive processes and digital reading. In Barzillai, M., Thompson, J., Schroeder, S., & van den Broek, P. (Eds.), Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 57–89). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J. (2013). Effects of extensive reading on reading attitudes in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25(2), 248–263.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J. (2019). Integrating content as a way of promoting students’ involvement and ownership in skill-focused instruction. In Koda, K. & Yamashita, J. (Eds.), Reading to learn in a foreign language (pp. 57–83). Routledge.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J. (2022). L2 reading comprehension: Theory and research. In Jeon, E. H. & In’nami, Y. (Eds.), Understanding L2 proficiency: Theoretical and meta-analytic investigation (pp. 5–28). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J., & Koda, K. (2019). Benefits and challenges of theory-guided approaches to FL instruction. In Koda, K. & Yamashita, J. (Eds.), Reading to learn in a foreign language. (pp. 211–219). Routledge.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J., & Shiotsu, T. (2017). Comprehension and knowledge components that predict L2 reading: A latent-trait approach. Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 43–67.Google Scholar
Yang, M., Cooc, N., & Sheng, L. (2017). An investigation of cross-linguistic transfer between Chinese and English: A meta-analysis. Asia–Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(1), 2–15.Google Scholar
Yang, C. L., Perfetti, C. A., Tan, L.-H., & Jiang, Y. (2018). ERP indicators of L2 proficiency in word–to–text integration processes. Neuropsychologia, 117, 287–301.Google Scholar
Yang, Y.-F. (2006). Reading strategies or comprehension monitoring strategies? Reading Psychology, 27(4), 313–343.Google Scholar
Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2015). Visual word recognition. In Pollatsek, A. & Treiman, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 26–43). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., et al. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 329–339.Google Scholar
Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., et al. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(September), 364–380.Google Scholar
Yeari, M., van den Broek, P., & Oudega, M. (2015). Processing and memory of central versus peripheral information as a function of reading goals: Evidence from eye-movements. Reading and Writing, 28, 1071–1097.Google Scholar
Yoshizawa, K., Takase, A., & Otsuki, K. (2018). How does extensive reading help Japanese EFL learners develop grammatical knowledge and reading fluency. Extensive Reading World Congress Proceedings, 4, 1–11.Google Scholar
Young, C. J., & Rasinski, T. (2018). Readers theater: Effects on word recognition automaticity and reading prosody. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(3), 475–485.Google Scholar
Yurovsky, D., Fricker, D. C., Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2014). The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1–22.Google Scholar
Zawilinski, L., Forzani, E., Timbrell, N., & Leu, D. J. (2019). Best practices in teaching the new literacies of online research and comprehension. In Morrow, L. M. & Gambrell, L. B. (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (6th ed., pp. 337–358). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, C. (2013). Effects of instruction on ESL students’ synthesis writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 51–67.Google Scholar
Zhang, S., & Zhang, X. (2020). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, (online preprint 4-26-21).Google Scholar
Zheng, Y., & De Jong, J. H. A. L. (2011). Research note: Establishing construct and concurrent validity of Pearson Test of English Academic. Pearson. https://pearsonpte.com/wpcontent/uploads/2014/07/RN_EstablishingConstructAndConcurrentValidityOfPTEAcademic_2011.pdfGoogle Scholar
Zill, N., & Resnick, G. (2006). Emergent literacy of low-income children in Head Start: Relationships with child and family characteristics, program factors, and classroom quality. In Dickinson, D. K. & Neuman, S. B. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy development (Vol. 2, pp. 347–371). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R., & Radvansky, G. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185Google Scholar
Zwann, R., & Rapp, D. (2006). Discourse comprehension. In Traxler, M. & Gernsbacher, M. A. (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 725–764). Academic Press.Google Scholar