Anderson, Richard C., Spiro, Rand J., and Anderson, Mark C.. (1978). “Schemata as Scaffolding for the Representation of Information in Connected Discourse,” American Educational Research Journal 15/3: 433–440.Google Scholar

Anthony, Ted. (2007). Chasing the Rising Sun: The Journey of an American Song. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R. C. and Shiffrin, R. M.. (1968). “Human Memory: A Proposed System and Its Control Processes,” in Spence, K. W. and Spence, J. T. (eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Academic Press: 89–195.Google Scholar

Baddeley, Alan. (2004). Your Memory: A User's Guide. Buffalo, NY: Firefly Books.Google Scholar

Baddeley, Alan D. and Hitch, Graham. (1993). “The Recency Effect: Implicit Learning with Explicit Retrieval?” Memory & Cognition 21/2: 146–155.Google Scholar

Baddeley, Alan D., Thomson, Neil, and Buchanan, Mary. (1975). “Word Length and the Structure of Short-Term Memory,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14/6: 575–589.Google Scholar

Bain, Alexander. (1890). English Composition and Rhetoric. Enlarged edn. London: Longmans, Green, and Company.Google Scholar

Bazerman, Charles. (2003). “Speech Acts, Genres, and Activity Systems: How Texts Organize Activity and People,” in Bazerman, Charles and Prior, Paul (eds.), What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices. New York: Routledge: 309–339.Google Scholar

Berk, Robert N. and Whalen, Elizabeth. (1992). “Impediments to Clarity: An Annotated Glossary of Rhetorical Pratfalls and Pitfalls,” AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology 159/5: 1115–1121.Google Scholar

Bernal, Byron and Ardila, Alfredo. (2009). “The Role of the Arcuate Fasciculus in Conduction Aphasia,” Brain 132/9: 2309–2316.Google Scholar

Billig, Michael. (2008). “The Language of Critical Discourse Analysis: The Case of Nominalization,” Discourse & Society 19/6: 783–800.Google Scholar

Black, John B. and Bower, Gordon H.. (1979). “Episodes as Chunks in Narrative Memory,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornkessel, Ina, Schlesewsky, Matthias, and Friederici, Angela D.. (2002). “Beyond Syntax: Language-related Positivities Reflect the Revision of Hierarchies,” NeuroReport 13/3: 361–364.Google Scholar

Bornkessel, Ina, Zysset, Stefan, Friederici, Angela D., von Cramon, D. Yves, and Schlesewsky, Matthias. (2005). “Who Did What to Whom? The Neural Basis of Argument Hierarchies during Language Comprehension,” Neuroimage 26/1: 221–233.Google Scholar

Bower, Gordon H., Black, John B., and Turner, Terrence J.. (1979). “Scripts in Memory for Text,” Cognitive Psychology 11/2: 177–220.Google Scholar

Britt, M. Anne. (1994). “The Interaction of Referential Ambiguity and Argument Structure in the Parsing of Prepositional Phrases,” Journal of Memory and Language 33/2: 251–283.Google Scholar

Britton, Bruce K. (1994). “Understanding Expository Text: Building Mental Structures to Induce Insights,” in Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press: 641–674.Google Scholar

Britton, James. (1982). “A Reader's Expectations,” in Pradl, Gordon M. (ed.), Prospect and Retrospect: Selected Essays of James Britton. Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook: 130–138.Google Scholar

Brown, Ann L. (1982). “Learning How to Learn from Reading,” in Langer, Judith A. and Smith-Burke, M. Trika (eds.), Reader Meets Author/Bridging the Gap: A Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspective. Newark, DE: International Reading Association: 26–54.Google Scholar

Bruner, Jerome. (1986).Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bryson, Bill. (1990). The Mother Tongue: English and How It Got That Way. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar

Büchel, Christian, Price, Cathy, Frackowiak, R. S., and Friston, Karl. (1998). “Different Activation Patterns in the Visual Cortex of Late and Congenitally Blind Subjects,” Brain 121/3: 409–419.Google Scholar

Carpenter, Ronald H. (1999). Choosing Powerful Words: Eloquence That Works. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Carter, Rita. (1998). Mapping the Mind. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace L. (1974). “Language and Consciousness,” Language 50/1: 111–133.Google Scholar

Chang, Franklin, Dell, Gary S., Bock, Kathryn, and Griffin, Zenzi M.. (2000). “Structural Priming as Implicit Learning: A Comparison of Models of Sentence Production,” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29/2: 217–230.Google Scholar

Cirilo, Randolph K. (1981). “Referential Coherence and Text Structure in Story Comprehension,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20/3: 358–367.Google Scholar

Clanchy, Michael T. (1979). From Memory to Written Record 1066–1307. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. and Sengul, C. J.. (1979). “In Search of Referents for Nouns and Pronouns,” Memory & Cognition 7/1: 35–41.Google Scholar

Clifton, Charles, Frazier, Lyn, and Connine, Cynthia. (1984). “Lexical Expectations in Sentence Comprehension,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23/6: 696–708.Google Scholar

Clifton, Charles, Staub, Adrian, and Rayner, Keith. (2007). “Eye Movements in Reading Words and Sentences,” in van Gompel, Roger P. G. (ed.), Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 341–372.Google Scholar

Cobban, Alan B. (1975). The Medieval Universities: Their Development and Organisation. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Cordes, Jason L. (2002). “When Liability Can Attach for Remaining Passive: Construction of the Term ‘Disposal’ under Cercla: Crofton Ventures Limited Partnership v. G & H Partnership 1,” Missouri Environmental Law & Policy Review 9: 67–154.Google Scholar

Costello, Fintan J. and Keane, Mark T.. (2000). “Efficient Creativity: Constraint-guided Conceptual Combination,” Cognitive Science 24/2: 299–349.Google Scholar

Coulson, Seana, King, Jonathan W., and Kutas, Marta. (1998). “Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations,” Language & Cognitive Processes 13/1: 21–58.Google Scholar

Crowhurst, Marion. (1990). “Reading/Writing Relationships: An Intervention Study,” Canadian Journal of Education 15/2: 155–172.Google Scholar

Crystal, David. (2004). The Stories of English. New York: Overlook Press.Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter W. and Levine, Robert D.. (2001). “Stylistic Inversion in English: A Reconsideration,” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19/2: 283–310.Google Scholar

Cutrell, Edward and Guan, Zhiwei. (2007). “What Are You Looking For?: An Eye-Tracking Study of Information Usage in Web Search,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Digital Machinery (ACM).Google Scholar

Daneman, Meredyth. (1982). “The Measurement of Reading Comprehension: How Not to Trade Construct Validity for Predictive Power,” Intelligence 6/4: 331–345.Google Scholar

Daneman, Meredyth and Carpenter, Patricia A. (1983). “Individual Differences in Integrating Information between and within Sentences,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9/4: 561–584.Google Scholar

Davelaar, Eddy J., Goshen-Gottstein, Yonatan, Ashkenazi, Amir, Haarmann, Henk J., and Usher, Marius. (2005). “The Demise of Short-term Memory Revisited: Empirical and Computational Investigations of Recency Effects,” Psychological Review 112/1: 3–42.Google Scholar

Davis, Kirsten. (2005). “Persuasion through Organization: The Final Installment – Transitions,” Arizona Attorney: 31–33.Google Scholar

Dee-Lucas, Diana, Just, Marcel Adam, Carpenter, Patricia A., and Daneman, Meredyth. (1982). “What Eye Fixations Tell Us about the Time Course of Text Integration,” in Groner, Rudolf and Fraisse, Paul (eds.), Cognition and Eye Movements. Leipzig: North-Holland: 155–168.Google Scholar

Dehaene, Stanislas. (2009). Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

DeKay, Sam H. (2010). “Focus on Business Practices: Designing Email Messages for Corporate Readers: A Case Study of Effective and Ineffective Rhetorical Strategies at a Fortune 100 Company,” Business Communication Quarterly 73/1: 109–119.Google Scholar

Dermer, Marshall L., Lopez, Shannon L., and Messling, Paul A.. (2010). “Fluency Training a Writing Skill: Editing for Concision,” The Psychological Record 59/1: 3–20.Google Scholar

Diederich, Paul, French, John W., and Carlton, Sydell T.. (1961). “Factors in Judgments of Writing Quality,” Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service: ERIC ED 002 172.

Dor, Daniel. (2003). “On Newspaper Headlines as Relevance Optimizers,” Journal of Pragmatics 35/5: 695–721.Google Scholar

Duggan, Geoffrey B. and Payne, Stephen J.. (2011). “Skim Reading by Satisficing: Evidence from Eye Tracking,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Digital Machinery (ACM): 1141–1150.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. (1979). The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. (1983). The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erasmus, Desiderius. (1978). Copia: Foundations of the Abundant Style (De Duplici Copia Verborum ac Rerum Commentarii Duo). Trans. Knott, Betty. In Thompson, Craig R. (ed.), Collected Works of Erasmus. Vol. xxiv. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan. (2014). The Language Myth: Why Language Is Not an Instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fahnestock, Jeanne. (1983). “Semantic and Lexical Coherence,” College Composition and Communication 34/4: 400–416.Google Scholar

Ferreira, Fernanda. (2003). “The Misinterpretation of Noncanonical Sentences,” Cognitive Psychology 47: 164–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ferreira, Fernanda, Bailey, Karl G. D., and Ferraro, Vittoria. (2002). “Good-enough Representations in Language Comprehension,” Current Directions in Psychological Science 11/1: 11–15.Google Scholar

Ferreira, Fernanda, and Clifton, Charles. (1986). “The Independence of Syntactic Processing,” Journal of Memory and Language 25: 348–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferreira, Fernanda and Stacey, Janis. (2000). “The Misinterpretation of Passive Sentences,” unpublished manuscript.

Fischer, Steven Roger. (2005). A History of Reading. Amsterdam: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, Jill and Shanahan, Timothy. (2000). “Reading and Writing Relations and Their Development,” Educational Psychologist 35/1: 39–50.Google Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne. (1990). Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Flesch, Rudolf. (1974). The Art of Readable Writing. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Flesch, Rudolf. (1979). How to Write in Plain English: A Book for Lawyers and Consumers. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Fowler, H. W. (1965). A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fox, Julia R., Park, Byungho, and Lang, Annie. (2007). “When Available Resources Become Negative Resources: The Effects of Cognitive Overload on Memory Sensitivity and Criterion Bias,” Communication Research 34/3: 277–296.Google Scholar

Frase, Lawrence T. (1969). “Paragraph Organization of Written Materials: The Influence of Conceptual Clustering upon the Level and Organization of Recall,” Journal of Educational Psychology 60/5: 394–401.Google Scholar

Frazier, Lyn and Rayner, Keith. (1982). “Making and Correcting Errors during Sentence Comprehension: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous Sentences,” Cognitive Psychology 14/2: 178–210.Google Scholar

Frazier, Lyn, Taft, Lori, Roeper, Tom, Clifton, Charles, and Ehrlich, Kate. (1984). “Parallel Structure: A Source of Facilitation in Sentence Comprehension,” Memory & Cognition 12/5: 421–430.Google Scholar

Garnham, Alan, Oakhill, Jane, and Johnson-Laird, P. N.. (1982). “Referential Continuity and the Coherence of Discourse,” Cognition 11/1: 29–46.Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward. (1998). “Linguistic Complexity: Locality of Syntactic Dependencies,” Cognition 68: 1–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Glanzer, M. (1972). “Storage Mechanisms in Recall,” in Bower, G. H. and Spence, J. T. (eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. New York: Academic Press: 129–193.Google Scholar

Glenberg, Arthur M. and Swanson, Naomi G.. (1986). “A Temporal Distinctiveness Theory of Recency and Modality Effects,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12/1: 3–15.Google Scholar

Gombrich, E. H. (1961). Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. New York: Bollingen Foundation.Google Scholar

Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall, and Levine, William H.. (2002). “Memory-load Interference in Syntactic Processing,” Psychological Science 13/5: 425–430.Google Scholar

Graesser, Arthur C., Millis, Keith K., and Zwaan, Rolf A.. (1997). “Discourse Comprehension,” Annual Review of Psychology 48/1: 163–189.Google Scholar

Graesser, Arthur C., Karnavat, Ashish B., Daniel, Frances K., Cooper, Elisa, Whitten, Shannon N., and Louwerse, Max. (2001). “A Computer Tool to Improve Questionnaire Design,” paper presented at the Funding Opportunity in Survey Research Seminar, June 11, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC.

Graf, Peter, and Schacter, Daniel L.. (1985). “Implicit and Explicit Memory for New Associations in Normal and Amnesic Subjects,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11/3: 501–518.Google Scholar

Greene, Steven B. and McKoon, Gail. (1995). “Telling Something We Can't Know: Experimental Approaches to Verbs Exhibiting Implicit Causality,” Psychological Science 6/5: 262–270.Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. (1975). “Logic and Conversation,” in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press: 41–58.Google Scholar

Gunning, Robert and Kallan, Richard A.. (1994). How to Take the Fog out of Business Writing. Chicago: Dartnell.Google Scholar

Hagoort, Peter, Brown, Colin, and Groothusen, Jolanda. (1993). “The Syntactic Positive Shift (SPS) as an ERP Measure of Syntactic Processing,” Language & Cognitive Processes 8/4: 439–483.Google Scholar

Hakala, Christopher M. and O'Brien, Edward J.. (1995). “Strategies for Resolving Coherence Breaks in Reading,” Discourse Processes 20/2: 167–185.Google Scholar

Handlin, Amy, Mosca, Joseph B., Forgione, Dana A., and Pitta, Dennis. (2003). “DTC Pharmaceutical Advertising: The Debate's not Over,” Journal of Consumer Marketing 20/3: 227–237.Google Scholar

Harwood, Nigel. (2005). “‘Nowhere Has Anyone Attempted … in This Article I Aim to Do Just That’: A Corpus-based Study of Self-Promotional I and We in Academic Writing across Four Disciplines,” Journal of Pragmatics 37/8: 1207–1231.Google Scholar

Heider, Fritz and Simmel, Marianne. (1944). “An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior,” American Journal of Psychology 57/2: 243–259.Google Scholar

Heilman, Kenneth M., Leon, Susan A., and Rosenbek, John C.. (2004). “Affective Aprosodia from a Medial Frontal Stroke,” Brain and language 89/3: 411–416.Google Scholar

Herbert, A. S. (1967). Historical Catalogue of Printed Editions of the English Bible 1525–1961. New York: American Bible Society.Google Scholar

Higgins, Derrick, Burstein, Jill, Marcu, Daniel, and Gentile, Claudia. (2004). “Evaluating Multiple Aspects of Coherence in Student Essays,” paper presented at the Higher Learning/Teaching-NAACL, Boston, MA. Available as of 2014 via download at www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/erater_higgins_dis_coh.pdf.

Horwitz, B., Rumsey, J. M., and Donohue, B. C.. (1998). “Functional Connectivity of the Angular Gyrus in Reading and Dyslexia,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 8939–8944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hyland, Ken. (2004). “Disciplinary Interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 Postgraduate Writing,” Journal of Second Language Writing 13/2: 133–151.Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken and Tse, Polly. (2004). “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal,” Applied Linguistics 25/2: 156–177.Google Scholar

Just, Marcel Adam and Carpenter, Patricia A.. (1980). “A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixations to Comprehension,” Psychological Review 87/4: 329–354.Google Scholar

Just, Marcel Adam, Carpenter, Patricia A., Keller, Timothy A., Eddy, William F., and Thulborn, Keith R.. (1996). “Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension,” Science 274: 114–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kieras, David E. (1978). “Good and Bad Structure in Simple Paragraphs: Effects on Apparent Theme, Reading Time, and Recall,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17/1: 13–28.Google Scholar

King, Jonathan and Just, Marcel Adam. (1991). “Individual Differences in Syntactic Processing: The Role of Working Memory,” Journal of Memory and Language 30/5: 580–602.Google Scholar

Kintsch, Walter. (1988). “The Role of Knowledge in Discourse Comprehension: A Construction-Integration Model,” Psychological Review 95/2: 163–182.Google Scholar

Kintsch, Walter. (2002). “On the Notions of Theme and Topic in Psychological Process Models of Text Comprehension,” Thematics: Interdisciplinary Studies 3: 157–170.Google Scholar

Kintsch, Walter and van Dijk, Teun A.. (1978). “Toward a Model of Text Comprehension and Production,” Psychological Review 85/5: 363–394.Google Scholar

Kintsch, Walter and Vipond, Douglas. (1979). “Reading Comprehension and Readability in Educational Practice and Psychological Theory,” in Nilsson, Lars-Göran (ed.), Perspectives on Memory Research: Essays in Honor of Uppsala University's 500th Anniversary. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 329–365.Google Scholar

Klee, Hilary and Legge, David. (1976). “Estimates of Concreteness and Other Indices for 200 Transitive Verbs,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 2/4: 497–507.Google Scholar

Knoblauch, C. H. and Brannon, Lil. (1984). Rhetorical Traditions and the Teaching of Writing. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar

Landauer, Thomas. (1995). The Trouble with Computers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lebovits, Gerald. (2006). “The Department of Redundancy Department: Concision and Succinctness – Part II,” New York State Bar Association Journal 78/7: 44–54.Google Scholar

Lepore, Jill. (2014). “Away from My Desk,” The New Yorker, May 12: 72–74.Google Scholar

Leslie, Alan and Keeble, Stephanie. (1987). “Do Six-month-old Infants Perceive Causality?” Cognition 25: 265–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lieberman, Philip. (2001). “Human Language and Our Reptilian Brain: The Subcortical Bases of Speech, Syntax, and Thought,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44/1: 32–51.Google Scholar

Limaye, Mohan R. and Cherry, Roger D.. (1987). “Pragmatics, ‘Situated’ Language, and Business Communication,” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 1/1: 68–88.Google Scholar

Locker, Kitty O. (1987). “‘As Per Your Request’: A History of Business Jargon,” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 1/1: 27–47.Google Scholar

Lorch, Robert F. and Lorch, Elizabeth P.. (1985). “Topic Structure Representation and Text Recall,” Journal of Education Psychology 77/2: 137–148.Google Scholar

Luchins, Abraham S. (1958). “Definitiveness of Impression and Primacy–Recency in Communications,” Journal of Social Psychology 48/2: 275–290.Google Scholar

Lupker, Stephen J. (1984). “Semantic Priming without Association: A Second Look,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23/6: 709–733.Google Scholar

Mackay, Wendy E. (2000). “Responding to Cognitive Overload: Co-adaptation between Users and Technology,” Intellectica 30/1: 177–193.Google Scholar

Manguel, Alberto. (1996). A History of Reading. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Mason, Robert A., Just, Marcel Adam, Keller, Timothy A., and Carpenter, Patricia A.. (2003). “Ambiguity in the Brain: What Brain Imaging Reveals About the Processing of Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29/6: 1319–1338.Google Scholar

Masson, Michael E. (1982). “Cognitive Processes in Skimming Stories,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 8/5: 400–417.Google Scholar

Matsuda, Paul Kei and Tardy, Christine M.. (2007). “Voice in Academic Writing: The Rhetorical Construction of Author Identity in Blind Manuscript Review,” English for Specific Purposes 26/2: 235–249.Google Scholar

Mayer, Richard E. (1976). “Integration of Information during Problem Solving due to a Meaningful Context of Learning,” Memory & Cognition 4/5: 603–608.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Philip M., Renner, Adam M., Duncan, Michael G., Duran, Nicholas D., Lightman, Erin J., and McNamara, Danielle S.. (2008). “Identifying Topic Sentencehood,” Behavior Research Methods 40/3: 647–664.Google Scholar

McCrum, Robert, Cran, William, and MacNeil, Robert. (1992). The Story of English. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

McNamara, Danielle S., Crossley, Scott A., and McCarthy, Philip M.. (2010). “Linguistic Features of Writing Quality,” Written Communication 27/1: 57–86.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John. (2001). The Power of Babel: A Natural History of Language. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Michael, Erica B., Keller, Timothy A., Carpenter, Patricia A., and Just, Marcel Adam. (2001). “fMRI Investigation of Sentence Comprehension by Eye and by Ear: Modality Fingerprints on Cognitive Processes,” Human Brain Mapping 13: 239–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Michotte, A. (1963). The Perception of Causality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Miller, George A. (1956). “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information,” Psychological Review 63: 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, James R. and Kintsch, Walter. (1980). “Recall and Readability of Short Prose Passages.” paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Boston, MA. April 7–11: 32pp.

Miyake, Akira, Just, Marcel Adam, and Carpenter, Patricia A.. (1994). “Working Memory Constraints on the Resolution of Lexical Ambiguity: Maintaining Multiple Interpretations in Neutral Contexts,” Journal of Memory and Language 33/2: 175–202.Google Scholar

Moore, Gordon E. (1965). “Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits,” Electronics, April 19: 114–117.Google Scholar

Moreno, Roxana and Mayer, Richard E.. (2000). “A Learner-centered Approach to Multimedia Explanations: Deriving Instructional Design Principles from Cognitive Theory,” Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-enhanced Learning 2/2: 12–20.Google Scholar

Murdock, Bennet B. (1962). “The Serial Position Effect of Free Recall,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 64/5: 482–488.Google Scholar

Murray, John D. and McGlone, Chadd. (1997). “Topic Overviews and Processing of Topic Structure,” Journal of Educational Psychology 89/2: 251–261.Google Scholar

Nell, Victor. (1988). Lost in a Book: The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholas, Serge. (1998). “Perceptual and Conceptual Priming of Individual Words in Coherent Texts,” Memory 6/6: 643–663.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Jakob. (2006). “F-shaped Pattern for Reading Web Content,” Alertbox: Current Issues in Web Usability. Available as of 2014 from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_patternhtml.Nishimura, Hiroshi, Hashikawa, Kazuo, Doi, Katsumi, Iwaki, Takako, Watanabe, Yoshiyuki, Kusuoka, Hideo, Nishimura, Tsunehiko, and Kubo, Takeshi. (1999). “Sign Language ‘Heard’ in the Auditory Cortex,” Nature 397: 116.Google Scholar

Noordman, Leo, Vonk, Wietske, and Kempff, Henk J.. (1992). “Causal Inferences during the Reading of Expository Texts,” Journal of Memory and Language 31/5: 573–590.Google Scholar

Norman, Suzanne, Kemper, Susan, Kynette, Donna, Cheung, Hintat, and Anagnopoulos, Cheryl. (1991). “Syntactic Complexity and Adults’ Running Memory Span,” Journal of Gerontology 46/6: 346–351.Google Scholar

Olson, David R. (1991). “Literacy and Objectivity: The Rise of Modern Science,” in Olson, David R. and Torrance, Nancy (eds.), Literacy and Orality. New York: Cambridge University Press: 149–164.Google Scholar

Olson, David R. and Filby, Nikola. (1972). “On the Comprehension of Active and Passive Sentences,” Cognitive Psychology 3/3: 361–481.Google Scholar

Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New York: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orwell, George. (1986). “Politics and the English Language,” in Abrams, M. H. (ed.), The Norton Anthology of English Literature. London: W. W. Norton: 2260–2270.Google Scholar

Paivio, Allan. (1990). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patel, Aniruddh D. (2010). Music, Language, and the Brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Paulesu, Eraldo, Frith, Christopher D., and Frackowiak, Richard S. J.. (1993). “The Neural Correlates of the Verbal Component of Working Memory,” Nature 362/25: 342–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pedersen, Olaf. (1997). The First Universities: Studium Generale and the Origins of University Education in Europe. Trans. North, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pennebaker, James W. (2011). The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say about Us. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar

Perfetti, Charles A. (1999). “Comprehending Written Language: A Blueprint of the Reader,” in Brown, C. M. and Hagoort, P. (eds.), The Neurocognition of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 167–208.Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. and Branigan, Holly P.. (1998). “The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production,” Journal of Memory and Language 39: 633–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. and Ferreira, Victor S.. (2008). “Structural Priming: A Critical Review,” Psychological Bulletin 134/3: 427–459.Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. and Garrod, Simon. (2013). “Forward Models and Their Implications for Production, Comprehension, and Dialogue,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36/4: 377–392.Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. (1994). The Language Instinct: How the Mind Generates Language. New York: Harper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plato, . (1973). Phaedrus. Trans. Hamilton, Walter. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Pluchino, Stefano, Quattrini, Angelo, Brambilla, Elena, Gritti, Angela, Salani, Giuliana, Dina, Giorgia, Galli, Rossella et al. (2003).“Injection of Adult Neurospheres Induces Recovery in a Chronic Model of Multiple Sclerosis,” Nature 422: 688–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramachandran, V. S. (2011). The Tell-Tale Brain: A Neuroscientist's Quest for What Makes Us Human. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Rayner, Keith, Carlson, Marcia, and Frazier, Lyn. (1983). “The Interaction of Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Processing: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Semantically Biased Sentences,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22/3: 358–374.Google Scholar

Rayner, Keith, Foorman, Barbara R., Perfetti, Charles A., Pesetsky, David, and Seidenberg, Mark S.. (2001). “How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2/2: 31–74.Google ScholarPubMed

Rhodes, Susan. (1997). “The Active and Passive Voice Are Equally Comprehensible in Scientific Writing,” PhD thesis, University of Washington, 1997. Available as of 2014 at https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/9033/9819294.pdf?sequence = 1&isAllowed = y.

Richards, I. A.(1930). Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. London: Kegan Paul Trench Trubner.Google Scholar

Ritchey, Kristin A. (2011). “How Generalization Inferences Are Constructed in Expository Text Comprehension,” Contemporary Educational Psychology 36/4: 280–288.Google Scholar

Rumelhart, David. (1975). “Notes on a Schema for Stories,” in Bobrow, David G. and Collins, Alan (eds.), Representation and Understanding. New York: Academic Press: 211–235.Google Scholar

Salager-Meyer, Françoise. (1994). “Hedges and Textual Communicative Function in Medical English Written Discourse,” English for Specific Purposes 13/2: 149–170.Google Scholar

Samuels, S. Jay and Kamil, Michael L.. (1984). “Models of the Reading Process,” Handbook of Reading Research 1: 185–224.Google Scholar

Schank, Roger C. (1982). Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schank, Roger and Abelson, Robert. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Schnotz, Wolfgang and Kürschner, Christian. (2007). “A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory,” Educational Psychology Review 19: 469–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwinges, Rainer Christoph. (1996). “Student Education, Student Life,” in de Ridder-Symoens, Hilde (ed.), Universities in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 195–243.Google Scholar

Shanahan, Timothy. (1984). “Nature of the Reading–Writing Relation: An Exploratory Multivariate Analysis,” Journal of Educational Psychology 76/3: 466–477.Google Scholar

Shanahan, Timothy. (2006). “Relations among Oral Language, Reading, and Writing Development,” in MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., and Fitzgerald, J. (eds.), Handbook of Writing Research. New York: Guildford Press: 171–186.Google Scholar

Shanahan, Timothy and Lomax, Richard G.. (1986). “An Analysis and Comparison of Theoretical Models of the Reading–Writing Relationship,” Journal of Educational Psychology 78/2: 116–123.Google Scholar

Sloan, Gary. (1988). “Relational Ambiguity between Sentences,” College Composition and Communication 39/2: 154–165.Google Scholar

Smith, Frank. (2012). Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. 6th edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Speedie, Lynn J., Wertman, Eliahu, Ta'ir, Judy, and Heilman, Kenneth M.. (1993). “Disruption of Automatic Speech Following a Right Basal Ganglia Lesion,” Neurology 43/9: 1768–1774.Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre. (1985). “Loose Talk,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86/1: 153–171.Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre. (2002). “Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind‐Reading,” Mind & Language 17/1–2: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre. (2004). “Relevance Theory,” in Horn, Laurence and Ward, Gregory (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell: 607–632.Google Scholar

Spiro, Rand J. (1980). “Prior Knowledge and Story Processing: Integration, Selection, and Variation,” Poetics 9/1: 313–327.Google Scholar

Spyridakis, Jan H. and Fukuoka, Waka. (2002). “The Effect of Inductively versus Deductively Organized Text on American and Japanese Readers,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 45/2: 99–114.Google Scholar

Stallings, Lynne M., MacDonald, Maryellen C., and O'Seaghdha, Padraig. (1998). “Phrasal Ordering Constraints in Sentence Production: Phrase Length and Verb Disposition in Heavy-NP Shift,” Journal of Memory and Language 39: 392–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinman, Lawrence. (2003). “Collateral Damage Repaired,” Nature 422: 671–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stelzner, Hermann G. (1966). “‘War Message,’ December 8, 1941: An Approach to Language,” Communications Monographs 33/4: 419–437.Google Scholar

Temperly, David. (2007). “Minimization of Dependency Length in Written English,” Cognition 105: 300–333.Google Scholar

Thapar, Anjal and Greene, Robert L.. (1993). “Evidence against a Short-term Store Account of Long-Term Recency Effects,” Memory & Cognition 21/3: 329–337.Google Scholar

Therriault, David J. and Raney, Gary E.. (2002). “The Representation and Comprehension of Place-on-the-Page and Text-Sequence Memory,” Scientific Studies of Reading 6/2: 117–134.Google Scholar

Trabasso, Tom and den Broek, Paul van. (1985). “Causal Thinking and the Representation of Narrative Events,” Journal of Memory and Language 24/5: 612–630.Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel. (1973). “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability,” Cognitive Psychology 5: 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van den Broek, Paul, Lorch, Robert F., Linderholm, Tracy, and Gustafson, Mary. (2001). “The Effects of Readers’ Goals on Inference Generation and Memory for Texts,” Memory & Cognition 29/8: 1081–1087.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A. (1988). The News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A. (2008). “Critical Discourse Analysis and Nominalization: Problem or Pseudo-Problem?” Discourse & Society 19/6: 821–828.Google Scholar

Wikborg, Eleanor. (1985). “Unspecified Topic in University Student Essays,” Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 5/4: 359–370.Google Scholar

Williams, Joanna P., Taylor, Maravene B., and Ganger, Sonia. (1981). “Text Variations at the Level of the Individual Sentence and the Comprehension of Simple Expository Paragraphs,” Journal of Educational Psychology 73/6: 851–865.Google Scholar

Williams, Joseph M. (1995). Style: Toward Clarity and Grace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wydick, Richard C. (1998). Plain English for Lawyers. 4th edn. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar

Yore, Larry D. and Shymansky, James A.. (1985). “Reading, Understanding, Remembering and Using Information in Written Science Materials,” in Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. Cincinnati, OH: ERIC: 1–59.Google Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf A. (1994). “Effect of Genre Expectations on Text Comprehension,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20/4: 920–933.Google Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf A. (1996). “Processing Narrative Time Shifts,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22/5: 1196–1207.Google Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf A., Langston, Mark C., and Graesser, Arthur. (1995). “The Construction of Situation Models in Narrative Comprehension: An Event-Indexing Model,” Psychological Science 6: 292–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf A. and Radvansky, Gabriel A.. (1998). “Situation Models in Language Comprehension and Memory,” Psychological Bulletin 123/2: 162–185.Google Scholar