Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:06:52.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2020

Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Rapid Ethnographies
A Practical Guide
 , pp. 151 - 155
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Anker, M, Guidotti, S, Orseszyna, S, Thuroax, M. Rapid evaluation methods (REM) of health service performance: Methodological observations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1993;71(1):15–21.Google Scholar
McNall, M, Foster-Fishman, P. Methods of rapid evaluation, assessment, and appraisal. American Journal of Evaluation 2007;28(2):151–168.Google Scholar
McNall, MA, Welch, VE, Ruh, KL, et al. The use of rapid-feedback evaluation methods to improve the retention rates of an HIV/AIDS healthcare intervention. Evaluation and Program Planning 2004;27:287–294.Google Scholar
Nunns, H. Responding to the demand for quicker evaluation findings. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 2009;34:89–99.Google Scholar
Shrank, W. The center for medicare and medicaid innovation's blueprint for rapid-cycle evaluation of new care and payment models. Health Affairs 2013;32:807–812.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Johnson, GA, Vindrola-Padros, C. Rapid qualitative research methods during complex health emergencies: A systematic review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine 2017;189:63–75.Google Scholar
Johnson, GA, Vindrola-Padros, C. Rapid techniques in qualitative research: A critical review of the literature. Qualitative Health Research 2020, doi: 10.1177/1049732320921835.Google Scholar
Vindrola-Padros, C, Brage, E, Johnson, GA. Rapid, responsive and relevant? A systematic review of rapid evaluations in healthcare. American Journal of Evaluation 2020, doi: 10.1177/1098214019886914.Google Scholar
Vindrola-Padros, C, Vindrola-Padros, B. Quick and dirty? A systematic review of the use of rapid ethnographies in healthcare organisation and delivery. BMJ Quality and Safety 2018;27:321–330.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, S, et al. Community-centered responses to Ebola in urban Liberia: The view from below. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2015;9(4):e0003706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beebe, J. Basic concepts and techniques of rapid appraisal. Human Organization 1995;54(1):42–51.Google Scholar
Beebe, J. Rapid Assessment Process: An Introduction. Oxford: AltaMira Press; 2001.Google Scholar
Beebe, J. Rapid Qualitative Inquiry. Second edn. London: Rowman and Littlefield; 2014.Google Scholar
Beebe, J. Rapid assessment process. In: Kempf-Leonard, K, editor. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. New York: Elsevier; 2005: 285–291.Google Scholar
Brown, D., et al. A participatory action research pilot study of urban health disparities using rapid assessment response and evaluation. American Journal of Public Health 2008;98(1):28–38. THIS IS THE ARTICLE THAT HAS EXAMPLES OF THE RAP SHEETGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R. Participatory rural appraisal: Analysis of experience. World Development 1994a;22(9):1253–1268.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 1994b;22(7):953–969. THIS IS THE ARTICLE THAT LISTS THE 29 METHODS.Google Scholar
Fitch, C, Rhodes, T, Stimson, G. Origins of an epidemic: The methodological and political emergence of rapid assessment. International Journal of Drug Policy 2000;11:63–82.Google Scholar
Harris, K, Jerome, N, Fawcett, S. Rapid assessment procedures: A review and critique. Human Organization 1997;56(3):375–378.Google Scholar
Manderson, L, Aaby, P. Can rapid anthropological procedures be applied to tropical diseases? Health Policy and Planning 1992a;7(1):46–55.Google Scholar
Manderson, L, Aaby, P. An epidemic in the field? Rapid assessment procedures and health research. Social Science & Medicine 1992b;35(7):839–850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMullen, C., et al. Rapid assessment of clinical information systems in the healthcare setting: An efficient method for time-pressed evaluation. Methods of Information in Medicine 2011;50(4):299–307.Google ScholarPubMed
Rifkin, S. Rapid appraisals for health: An overview. Rapid Rural Appraisal Notes 1992;16:7–12.Google Scholar
Scrimshaw, S, Hurtado, E. Anthropological involvement on the Central American diarrheal disease control project. Social Science & Medicine 1988;27(1):97–105.Google Scholar
Trotter, RTII, Needle, RH, Goosby, E, Bates, C, Singer, M. A methodological model for rapid assessment, response, and evaluation: The RARE program in public health. Field Methods 2001:13(2):137–159.Google Scholar
Utarini, A, Winkvist, A, Pelto, G. Appraising studies in health using rapid assessment procedures (RAP): Eleven critical criteria. Human Organization 2001;60(4):390–400.Google Scholar
Bentley, M, Pelto, G, Straus, W, Schumann, D, Adegbola, C, de la Pena, E, et al. Rapid ethnographic assessment: Applications in diarrhea management program. Social Science & Medicine 1988;27(1):107–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz, E, Higginbottom, G. The use of focused ethnography in nursing research. Nurse Researcher 2013;20(4):36–43.Google Scholar
Handwerker, P. Quick Ethnography: A Guide to Rapid Multi-Method Research. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2001.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, H. Focused ethnography. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2005;6(3):1–13.Google Scholar
Pink, S, Morgan, J. Short-term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction 2013;36(3):351–361.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. Transcribing with voice recognition software: A new tool for qualitative researchers. Qualitative Health Research 1998;8(5):718–723.Google Scholar
Burgess-Allen, J, Owen-Smith, V. Using mind mapping techniques for rapid qualitative data analysis in public participation processes. Health Expect 2010;13:406–415.Google Scholar
Gravois, T, Rosenfield, S, Greenberg, B. Establishing reliability for coding implementation concerns of school-based teams from audiotapes. Evaluation Review 1992;16(5):562–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, M, Kendrick, T, Davies, H, Gill, F. Hearing voices: Comparing two methods for analysis of focus group data. Applied Nursing Research 2017;35:90–93.Google Scholar
Halcomb, EJ, Davidson, PM. Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary? Applied Nursing Research 2006;19(1):38–42.Google Scholar
Joe, J, Chaudhuri, S, Le, T, Thompson, H, Demiris, G. The use of think-aloud and instant data analysis in evaluation research: Exemplar and lessons learned. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2015;56:284–291.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. The speed and accuracy of voice recognition software-assisted transcription versus the listen-and-type method: A research note. Qualitative Research 2011;11(1):91–97.Google Scholar
Lopez, KD, Febretti, A, Stifter, J, Johnson, A, Wilkie, DJ, Keenan, G. Toward a more robust and efficient usability testing method of clinical decision support for nurses derived from nursing electronic health record data. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge 2017;28(4):211–218.Google Scholar
Markle, T, West, R, Rich, P. Beyond transcription: Technology, change and refinement of method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2011;12(3):art. 21.Google Scholar
Neal, J, Neal, Z, VanDyke, E, Kornbluh, M. Expediting the analysis of qualitative data in evaluation: A procedure for the rapid identification of themes from audio recordings (RITA). American Journal of Evaluation 2015;36(1):118–132.Google Scholar
Park, J, Zeanah, E. An evaluation of voice recognition software for use in interview-based research: A research note. Qualitative Research 2005;5(2):245–251.Google Scholar
Petro, N. Hate taking notes? Try mind mapping. GP Solo 2010:21–23.Google Scholar
Scott, SD, Sharpe, H, O'Leary, K, Dehaeck, U, Hindmarsh, K, Moore, JG, Osmond, MH. Court reporters: A viable solution for the challenges of focus group data collection? Qualitative Health Research 2009;19(1):140–146.Google Scholar
Tattersall, C, Vernon, S. Mind mapping as a tool in qualitative research. Nursing Times 2007;103(26):32–33.Google Scholar
Taylor, B, Henshall, C, Kenyon, S, Litchfield, I, Greenfield, S. Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open 2018:e019993.Google Scholar
Tessier, S. From field notes to transcripts to tape recordings: Evolution or combination? International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2012;11(4):446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, D. Rapid and rigorous qualitative data analysis: The ‘RADaR’ technique for applied research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2017;16:1–9.Google Scholar
Anker, M, Guidotti, RJ, Orzeszyna, S, Sapirie, S. A, Thuriaux, MC. Rapid evaluation methods (REM) of health services performance: Methodological observations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1993;71(1):15–21.Google Scholar
Aspray, TJ, Nesbit, K, Cassidy, TP, Hawthorne, G. Rapid assessment methods used for health-equity audit: Diabetes mellitus among frail British care-home residents. Public Health 2006;120(11):1042–1051.Google Scholar
Bjornson-Benson, WM, Stibolt, TB, Manske, KA, Zavela, KJ, Youtsey, DJ, Buist, AS. Monitoring recruitment effectiveness and cost in a clinical trial. Controlled Clinical Trials 1993;14(2 Suppl):52S–67S.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, SNM, Moni, D. A situation analysis of the menstrual regulation programme in Bangladesh. Reproductive Health Matters 2004;12(24 Suppl):95–104.Google Scholar
Felisberto, E, Freese, E, Natal, S, Alves, CK de A. [A contribution to institutionalized health evaluation: A proposal for self-evaluation]. Cadernos de saude publica 2008;24(9):2091–2102.Google Scholar
Gale, R, Wu, J, Erhardt, T, Bounthavong, M, Reardon, C, Damschroder, L, Midboe, A. Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration. Implementation Science 2019;14:11.Google Scholar
Glasgow, R. et al. Conducting rapid, relevant research lessons learned from the my own health report project. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2014;47(2):212–219.Google Scholar
Grant, L., et al. Palliative care making a difference in rural Uganda, Kenya and Malawi: Three rapid evaluation field studies. BMC Palliative Care 2011;10:8.Google Scholar
Grasso, P. What makes an evaluation useful? Reflections from experience in large organizations. American Journal of Evaluation 2003;24(4):507–514.Google Scholar
Keith, R. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: A rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implementation Science 2017;12:15.Google Scholar
McNall, M, Welch, V, Ruh, K, Mildner, C, Soto, T. The use of rapid-feedback evaluation methods to improve the retention rates of an HIV/AIDS healthcare intervention. Evaluation and Program Planning 2004;27:287–294.Google Scholar
Munday, D. et al. Rural palliative care in North India: Rapid evaluation of a program using a realist mixed method approach. Indian Journal of Palliative Care 2018;24(1):3–8.Google Scholar
Nunns, H. Responding to the demand for quicker evaluation findings. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 2009;34:89–99.Google Scholar
Riley, W., et al. Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: A call for a rapid learning health research enterprise. Clinical and Translational Science 2013;2:10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandison, P. Desk-based review of real-time evaluation experience. UNICEF 2003.Google Scholar
Schneeweiss, S, Shrank, WH, Ruhl, M, Maclure, M. Decision-making aligned with rapid-cycle evaluation in health care. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2015;31:214–222.Google Scholar
Shrank, W. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation’s blueprint for rapid-cycle evaluation of new care and payment models. Health Affairs 2013;32(4):807–812.Google Scholar
Skillman, M. et al. A framework for rigorous qualitative research as a component of mixed method rapid-cycle evaluation. Qualitative Health Research 2019;29(2):279–289.Google Scholar
Taylor, B, Henshall, C, Kenyon, S, et al. Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open 2018;8:e019993.Google Scholar
Zakocs, R, Hill, JA, Brown, P, Wheaton, J, Freire, KE. The data-to-action framework: A rapid program improvement process. Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education 2015;42(4):471–479.Google Scholar
Tricco, A, et al. A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Medicine 2015;13:224.Google Scholar
Tricco, A, et al. Rapid Reviews to Strengthen Health Policy and Systems: A Practical Guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×