Anderson, Greg W., Guionnet, Alice, and Zeitouni, Ofer. An Introduction to Random Matrices, volume 118 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.Google Scholar

Ané, Cécile, Blachère, Sébastien, Chafaï, Djalil, Fougères, Pierre, Gentil, Ivan, Malrieu, Florent, Roberto, Cyril, and Scheffer, Grégory. Sur les Inégalités de Sobolev Logarithmiques, volume 10 of Panoramas et Synthèses [Panoramas and Syntheses]. Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 2000. With a preface by Dominique Bakry and Michel Ledoux.Google Scholar

Anttila, Milla, Ball, Keith, and Perissinaki, Irini. The central limit problem for convex bodies. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 355(12):4723–4735, 2003.Google Scholar

Artstein-Avidan, Shiri, Giannopoulos, Apostolos, and Milman, Vitali D.. Asymptotic Geometric Analysis. Part I, volume 202 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015.Google Scholar

Aubrun, Guillaume, Szarek, Stanisław, and Werner, Elisabeth. Hastings’s additivity counterexample via Dvoretzky’s theorem. Comm. Math. Phys., 305(1):85–97, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bai, Z. D.. Methodologies in spectral analysis of large-dimensional random matrices, a review. Statist. Sinica, 9(3):611–677, 1999. With comments by G. J. Rodgers and Jack W. Silverstein; and a rejoinder by the author.Google Scholar

Baik, Jinho and Rains, Eric M.. Algebraic aspects of increasing subsequences. Duke Math. J., 109(1):1–65, 2001.Google Scholar

Bakry, D. and Émery, Michel. Diffusions hypercontractives. In Séminaire de probabilités, XIX, 1983/84, volume 1123 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 177– 206. Springer, Berlin, 1985.Google Scholar

Bakry, Dominique, Gentil, Ivan, and Ledoux, Michel. Analysis and Geometry of Markov Diffusion Operators, volume 348 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer, Cham, 2014.Google Scholar

Berg, Christian, Peter, Jens Christensen, Reus, and Ressel, Paul. Harmonic Analysis On Semigroups: Theory of Positive Definite and Related Functions, volume 100 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.Google Scholar

Bhatia, Rajendra. Matrix Analysis, volume 169 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997.Google Scholar

Blower, Gordon. Random Matrices: High Dimensional Phenomena, volume 367 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.Google Scholar

Boucheron, Stéphane, Lugosi, Gábor, and Massart, Pascal. Concentration Inequalities: A Nonasymptotic Theory of Independence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.Google Scholar

Brazitikos, Silouanos, Giannopoulos, Apostolos, Valettas, Petros, and Vritsiou, Beatrice-Helen. Geometry of Isotropic Convex Bodies, volume 196 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2014.Google Scholar

Brehm, Ulrich and Voigt, Jürgen. Asymptotics of cross sections for convex bodies. Beiträge Algebra Geom., 41(2):437–454, 2000.Google Scholar

Bump, Daniel. Lie Groups, volume 225 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, second edition, 2013.Google Scholar

Bump, Daniel, Diaconis, Persi, and Keller, Joseph B.. Unitary correlations and the Fejér kernel. Math. Phys. Anal. Geom., 5(2):101–123, 2002.Google Scholar

Sourav Chatterjee and Elizabeth Meckes. Multivariate normal approximation using exchangeable pairs. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat., 4:257–283, 2008.Google Scholar

Chhaïbi, Réda, Najnudel, Joseph, and Nikeghbali, Ashkan. The circular unitary ensemble and the Riemann zeta function: the microscopic landscape and a new approach to ratios. Invent. Math., 207(1):23–113, 2017.Google Scholar

Collins, Benoît. Moments and cumulants of polynomial random variables on unitary groups, the Itzykson-Zuber integral, and free probability. Int. Math. Res. Not., (17):953–982, 2003.Google Scholar

Collins, Benoît and Śniady, Piotr. Integration with respect to the Haar measure on unitary, orthogonal and symplectic group. Comm. Math. Phys., 264(3):773–795, 2006.Google Scholar

Collins, Benoît and Stolz, Michael. Borel theorems for random matrices from the classical compact symmetric spaces. Ann. Probab., 36(3):876–895, 2008.Google Scholar

Conrey, J. B. and Snaith, N. C.. In support of n-correlation. Comm. Math. Phys., 330(2):639–653, 2014.Google Scholar

Coram, Marc and Diaconis, Persi. New tests of the correspondence between unitary eigenvalues and the zeros of Riemann’s zeta function. J. Phys. A, 36(12):2883–2906, 2003.Google Scholar

Dallaporta, S.. Eigenvalue variance bounds for Wigner and covariance random matrices. Random Matrices Theory Appl., 1(3):1250007, 28, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dallaporta, S.. Eigenvalue variance bounds for covariance matrices. Markov Process. Related Fields, 21(1):145–175, 2015.Google Scholar

D’Aristotile, Anthony, Diaconis, Persi, and Newman, Charles M.. Brownian motion and the classical groups. In Probability, Statistics and their Applications: Papers in Honor of Rabi Bhattacharya, volume 41 of IMS Lecture Notes Monogr. Ser., pages 97–116. Inst. Math. Statist., Beachwood, OH, 2003.Google Scholar

Davidson, Kenneth R. and Szarek, Stanislaw J.. Local operator theory, random matrices and Banach spaces. In Handbook of the Geometry of Banach Spaces, Vol. I, pages 317–366. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2001.Google Scholar

Dawid, A. P.. Some matrix-variate distribution theory: notational considerations and a Bayesian application. Biometrika, 68(1):265–274, 1981.Google Scholar

Dembo, Amir and Zeitouni, Ofer. Large Deviations Techniques and Applications, volume 38 of Applications of Mathematics (New York). Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1998.Google Scholar

Diaconis, Persi. Group Representations in Probability and Statistics, volume 11 of Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes—Monograph Series. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA, 1988.Google Scholar

Diaconis, Persi and Evans, Steven N.. Linear functionals of eigenvalues of random matrices. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 353(7):2615–2633, 2001.Google Scholar

Diaconis, Persi and Forrester, Peter J.. Hurwitz and the origins of random matrix theory in mathematics. Random Matrices Theory Appl., 6(1):1730001, 26, 2017.Google Scholar

Diaconis, Persi and Freedman, David. Asymptotics of graphical projection pursuit. Ann. Statist., 12(3):793–815, 1984.Google Scholar

Diaconis, Persi and Freedman, David. A dozen de Finetti-style results in search of a theory. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist., 23(2, suppl.):397–423, 1987.Google Scholar

Diaconis, Persi and Shahshahani, Mehrdad. On the eigenvalues of random matrices. J. Appl. Probab., 31A:49–62, 1994.Google Scholar

Diaconis, Persi W., Eaton, Morris L., and Lauritzen, Steffen L.. Finite de Finetti theorems in linear models and multivariate analysis. Scand. J. Statist., 19(4):289–315, 1992.Google Scholar

Döbler, Christian and Stolz, Michael. Stein’s method and the multivariate CLT for traces of powers on the classical compact groups. Electron. J. Probab., 16(86): 2375–2405, 2011.Google Scholar

Dudley, Richard M.. Real Analysis and Probability. The Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Mathematics Series. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Pacific Grove, CA, 1989.Google Scholar

Dvoretzky, Aryeh. Some results on convex bodies and Banach spaces. In Proc. Internat. Sympos. Linear Spaces (Jerusalem, 1960), pages 123–160. Jerusalem Academic Press, Jerusalem; Pergamon, Oxford, 1961.Google Scholar

Eaton, Morris L.. Group Invariance Applications in Statistics, volume 1 of NSF-CBMS Regional Conference Series in Probability and Statistics. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA; American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, 1989.Google Scholar

Edelman, Alan and Rao, N. Raj. Random matrix theory. Acta Numer., 14:233–297, 2005.Google Scholar

Fleury, B., Guédon, O., and Paouris, G.. A stability result for mean width of L_p-centroid bodies. Adv. Math., 214(2):865–877, 2007.Google Scholar

Forrester, P. J.. Log-Gases and Random Matrices, volume 34 of London Mathematical Society Monographs Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010.Google Scholar

Frankl, P. and Maehara, H.. The Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma and the sphericity of some graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 44(3):355–362, 1988.Google Scholar

Fulman, Jason. Stein’s method, heat kernel, and traces of powers of elements of compact Lie groups. Electron. J. Probab., 17(66): 16, 2012.Google Scholar

Fulton, William and Harris, Joe. Representation Theory, volume 129 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.Google Scholar

Gordon, Yehoram. Some inequalities for Gaussian processes and applications. Israel J. Math., 50(4):265–289, 1985.Google Scholar

Gromov, M.. Paul lévy isoperimetric inequality. I.H.E.S. preprint, 1980.Google Scholar

Gromov, M. and Milman, V. D.. A topological application of the isoperimetric inequality. Amer. J. Math., 105(4):843–854, 1983.Google Scholar

Hiai, Fumio and Petz, Dénes. A large deviation theorem for the empirical eigenvalue distribution of random unitary matrices. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist., 36(1):71–85, 2000.Google Scholar

Hiai, Fumio and Petz, Dénes. The Semicircle Law, Free Random Variables and Entropy, volume 77 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000.Google Scholar

Horn, Roger A. and Johnson, Charles R.. Topics in Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994. Corrected reprint of the 1991 original.Google Scholar

Horn, Roger A. and Johnson, Charles R.. Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 2013.Google Scholar

Hough, J. Ben, Krishnapur, Manjunath, Peres, Yuval, and Virág, Bálint. Determinantal processes and independence. Probab. Surv., 3:206–229, 2006.Google Scholar

Hughes, C. P., Keating, J. P., and O’Connell, Neil. On the characteristic polynomial of a random unitary matrix. Comm. Math. Phys., 220(2):429–451, 2001.Google Scholar

Hughes, C. P. and Rudnick, Z.. Mock-Gaussian behaviour for linear statistics of classical compact groups. J. Phys. A, 36(12):2919–2932, 2003. Random matrix theory.Google Scholar

Jiang, T. and Ma, Y.. Distances between random orthogonal matrices and independent normals. Preprint, 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05205.Google Scholar

Jiang, Tiefeng. How many entries of a typical orthogonal matrix can be approximated by independent normals? Ann. Probab., 34(4):1497–1529, 2006.Google Scholar

Johansson, Kurt. On random matrices from the compact classical groups. Ann. of Math. (2), 145(3):519–545, 1997.Google Scholar

Johnson, William B. and Lindenstrauss, Joram. Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into a Hilbert space. In Conference in modern analysis and probability (New Haven, Conn., 1982), volume 26 of Contemp. Math., pages 189–206. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1984.Google Scholar

Katz, Nicholas M. and Sarnak, Peter. Random Matrices, Frobenius Eigenvalues, and Monodromy, volume 45 of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999.Google Scholar

Katz, Nicholas M. and Sarnak, Peter. Zeroes of zeta functions and symmetry. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 36(1):1–26, 1999.Google Scholar

Keating, J. P., Mezzadri, F., and Singphu, B.. Rate of convergence of linear functions on the unitary group. J. Phys. A, 44(3):035204, 27, 2011.Google Scholar

Keating, J. P. and Snaith, N. C.. Random matrix theory and ζ(1/2 + it). Comm. Math. Phys., 214(1):57–89, 2000.Google Scholar

King, R. C.. Modification rules and products of irreducible representations of the unitary, orthogonal, and symplectic groups. J. Mathematical Phys., 12:1588–1598, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klartag, B.. A central limit theorem for convex sets. Invent. Math., 168(1):91–131, 2007.Google Scholar

Klartag, B.. Power-law estimates for the central limit theorem for convex sets. J. Funct. Anal., 245(1):284–310, 2007.Google Scholar

Landkof, N. S.. Foundations of Modern Potential Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1972. Translated from the Russian by A. P. Doohovskoy, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 180.Google Scholar

Ledoux, Michel. Concentration of measure and logarithmic Sobolev inequalities. In Séminaire de Probabilités, XXXIII, volume 1709 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 120–216. Springer, Berlin, 1999.Google Scholar

Ledoux, Michel. The Concentration of Measure Phenomenon, volume 89 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001.Google Scholar

Littlewood, Dudley E.. The Theory of Group Characters and Matrix Representations of Groups. Oxford University Press, New York, 1940.Google Scholar

Macchi, Odile. The coincidence approach to stochastic point processes. Advances in Appl. Probability, 7:83–122, 1975.Google Scholar

Meckes, E. and Meckes, M.. Rates of convergence for empirical spectral measures: A soft approach. In Carlen, E., Madiman, M., and Werner, E., editors, Convexity and Concentration, The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, pages 157–181. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2017.Google Scholar

Meckes, Elizabeth. Linear functions on the classical matrix groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 360(10):5355–5366, 2008.Google Scholar

Meckes, Elizabeth. Projections of probability distributions: a measure-theoretic Dvoretzky theorem. In Geometric aspects of functional analysis, volume 2050 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 317–326. Springer, Heidelberg, 2012.Google Scholar

Meckes, Elizabeth S. and Meckes, Mark W.. Concentration and convergence rates for spectral measures of random matrices. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 156(1-2):145–164, 2013.Google Scholar

Meckes, Elizabeth S. and Meckes, Mark W.. Spectral measures of powers of random matrices. Electron. Commun. Probab., 18(78): 13, 2013.Google Scholar

Mehta, Madan Lal. Random Matrices, volume 142 of Pure and Applied Mathematics (Amsterdam). Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, third edition, 2004.Google Scholar

Mezzadri, F. and Snaith, N. C., editors. Recent Perspectives in Random Matrix Theory and Number Theory, volume 322 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.Google Scholar

Mezzadri, Francesco. How to generate random matrices from the classical compact groups. Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 54(5):592–604, 2007.Google Scholar

Milman, V. D.. A new proof of A. Dvoretzky’s theorem on cross-sections of convex bodies. Funkcional. Anal. i Priložen., 5(4):28–37, 1971.Google Scholar

Milman, Vitali D. and Schechtman, Gideon. Asymptotic Theory of Finite-Dimensional Normed Spaces, volume 1200 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986. With an appendix by M. Gromov.Google Scholar

Montgomery, H. L.. The pair correlation of zeros of the zeta function. pages 181– 193, 1973.Google Scholar

Muirhead, Robb J.. Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1982. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics.Google Scholar

Pasquale, Angela. Weyl’s integration formula for U(N). Based on an introductory lecture delivered at the DMV Seminar “The Riemann Zeta Function and Random Matrix Theory,” October, 2000, Oberwolfach, Germany. Available online at http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~rudnick/dmv/Weyl.ps.Google Scholar

Pastur, Leonid and Shcherbina, Mariya. Eigenvalue Distribution of Large Random Matrices, volume 171 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2011.Google Scholar

Rains, E. M.. High powers of random elements of compact Lie groups. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 107(2):219–241, 1997.Google Scholar

Rains, E. M.. Increasing subsequences and the classical groups. Electron. J. Combin., 5:Research Paper 12, 9, 1998.Google Scholar

Rains, Eric M.. Images of eigenvalue distributions under power maps. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 125(4):522–538, 2003.Google Scholar

Ram, Arun. Characters of Brauer’s centralizer algebras. Pacific J. Math., 169(1):173–200, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudnick, Zeév and Sarnak, Peter. Zeros of principal L-functions and random matrix theory. Duke Math. J., 81(2):269–322, 1996.Google Scholar

Schechtman, Gideon. A remark concerning the dependence on ɛ in Dvoretzky’s theorem. In Geometric aspects of functional analysis (1987–88), volume 1376 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 274–277. Springer, Berlin, 1989.Google Scholar

Soshnikov, A.. Determinantal random point fields. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 55(5(335)):107–160, 2000.Google Scholar

Soshnikov, Alexander. The central limit theorem for local linear statistics in classical compact groups and related combinatorial identities. Ann. Probab., 28(3):1353–1370, 2000.Google Scholar

Stein, Charles.. The accuracy of the normal approximation to the distribution of the traces of powers of random orthogonal matrices. Technical Report No. 470, Stanford University Department of Statistics, 1995.Google Scholar

Stewart, Kathryn. Total variation approximation of random orthogonal matrices by gaussian matrices. Journal of Theoretical Probability, to appear. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.06641.Google Scholar

Stolz, Michael. On the Diaconis-Shahshahani method in random matrix theory. J. Algebraic Combin., 22(4):471–491, 2005.Google Scholar

Sudakov, V. N.. Typical distributions of linear functionals in finite-dimensional spaces of high dimension. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 243(6):1402–1405, 1978.Google Scholar

Talagrand, Michel. The Generic Chaining. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005. Upper and lower bounds of stochastic processes.Google Scholar

Vempala, Santosh S.. The Random Projection Method, volume 65 of DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004. With a foreword by Christos H. Papadimitriou.Google Scholar

Villani, Cédric. Optimal Transport: Old and New, volume 338 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009.Google Scholar

Warner, Frank W.. Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups, volume 94 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1983. Corrected reprint of the 1971 edition.Google Scholar

Weissler, Fred B.. Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities and hypercontractive estimates on the circle. J. Funct. Anal., 37(2):218–234, 1980.Google Scholar

Weyl, Hermann. The Classical Groups. Their Invariants and Representations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1939.Google Scholar

Wieand, K.. Eigenvalue distributions of random unitary matrices. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 123(2):202–224, 2002.Google Scholar

Wojtaszczyk, P.. Banach Spaces for Analysts, volume 25 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar